Don't worry, I'm simply being honest about how I view revisionist history regarding the Holocaust.
You try to be honest while refraining from insults and I can only respect that.
I'm a traditionalist at present time because I see no reason not to be. If the Holocaust happened, which I certainly believe it did, then it is rather revolting to try and say it didn't happen. I am open to examine some of the evidence though when I have the time... and it may lead me into further exploration, but that is my position at present. 
Is it also revolting to question whether the US had prior knowledge of Pearl Harbor? Is it also revolting to question whether the CIA and/or Mossad were involved in the attacks of 9/11? Is it also revolting to question whether or not the Lusitania contained explosives? Is it also revolting you question whether Lee Harvey Oswald, Sirhan Sirhan, Mark David Chapman, James Earl Ray, Talmadge Hayer and John Patler were all lone gunmen?
Why is it that fairly few people tend to get emotional when someone questions the status quo on the topics mentioned above, whereas they get angry or disgusted when someone questions the status quo with regards to the fate of the Jews during WW2? Why does this particular part of our history get so much attention, including the erection of dozens of monuments all over the Western world and special censorship laws in various countries? Why have faculties been dedicated to just this particular topic?
Some argue that (under the assumption that the Holocaust myth is entirely factual) it is the worst crime in the history of man. I wonder what measures of comparison are used, though. US and English bombers killed tends of thousands (if not hundreds of thousands) of people in a single day and under the most horrible circumstances in cities like Hiroshima, Nagasaki or Dresden. During the latest years of WW2 and in its aftermath, millions of innocent Germans were forced out of their homes, tortured, raped or killed by the allies. Others found their deaths in one of the Russian or American camps. Communist leaders like Trotsky, Stalin, Pol Pot and Mao are responsible for the death of many many millions under the most horrible circumstances. Hutus and Tutsis have been killing one another for years in Rwanda. During the Boer Wars, the British sent women and children to concentration camps with little food and medicine (on purpose !) to discourage the Boer fighters at the front as their family was dying in those camps. etc. etc. The Holocaust myth is hardly the only reference to man's inhumanity to man and even if the myth was entirely true, one should wonder what makes it stand out among the many crimes against humanity commited during the last 150 years alone.
Some argue that denying that 6 million Jews died as a consequence of genocide is similar to a call for genocide. This is a completely illogical statement, however, that holds no ground. Even if it were true that all Holocaust Revisionists were national-socialist apologists or antisemites (which is far from the truth), then this is by no means an indication that Holocaust Revisionism is remotely linked to a call for genocide. Such a link is an obvious attempt to silence debate by stirring emotions.
Yet, even those arguments shouldn't be a reason to stop or discourage objective research into the events that took place between 1933 and 1945 with regards to the Jews in German controlled territories. If there is even the slightest reason to doubt the status quo, then one should be able to examen the evidence and find out whether or not another conclusion might fit the evidence better. Currently, this has been made impossible by especially ancient aliens (who use the Holocaust myth for both political and monetary gain).
I suggest you watch at least one of the videos in the first post of this thread and post a review of it in this thread after you finished watching. It would give you some insight into the arguments used by Holocaust revisionists, it would liven up the debate and would only take a small amount of time
