INTENSITY²

Arena for the Competitive => Main Event Callouts => Topic started by: Squidusa on May 07, 2011, 06:55:44 PM

Title: Lutra , please explain yourself.
Post by: Squidusa on May 07, 2011, 06:55:44 PM
[Sat 17:09] <Sexy Cthulhu> Lutra if you're trying to argue with Schleed , or w.e make a callout.
[Sat 16:55] <lutra> Schleed, wanking, 4 inches stiffy....
[Sat 16:45] <lutra> Schleed, dude....   (I'm going to fuck you up)

I suggested you do that as you obviously have a problem with Schleed and this is the place to do it , you then responded with:

[Sat 18:40] <lutra>   You, squiddy fag and schleed.. are alike, we think..

This strikes me as a pretty low blow on my sexuality , I'm not too bothered by what is your problem with me?

You then said:

[Sat 18:48] <lutra> You're both are first class cowards.. and we accept..

Apart from the fact not only is this a hilarious statement from someone who hides in the shoutbox all the time , but I have absolutely no idea how you think I am a coward?
(I'll leave Schleed to say what he wants on this, he can comment here too if he feels it appropriate)

So again Lutra , what is your problem with me? , I'll try and listen and not roll my eyes at you , honest.  :LOL:
Title: Re: Lutra , please explain yourself.
Post by: lutra on May 07, 2011, 07:00:51 PM
 :lutra:

(a good night's sleep first for me.. you and schleed should get some too, I think)
Title: Re: Lutra , please explain yourself.
Post by: Squidusa on May 07, 2011, 07:03:25 PM
:lutra:

(a good night's sleep first for me.. you and schleed should get some too, I think)

Don't dodge the question , answer me.

You make a statement on here be prepared to be called out on it , and then back it up.

I ask again , what is your problem with me?
Title: Re: Lutra , please explain yourself.
Post by: DukeNukem on May 07, 2011, 07:05:42 PM
:lutra:

(a good night's sleep first for me.. you and schleed should get some too, I think)

Don't dodge the question , answer me.

You make a statement on here be prepared to be called out on it , and then back it up.

I ask again , what is your problem with me?

I don't think lutra wants to answer you because you dodge women. :zoinks:
Title: Re: Lutra , please explain yourself.
Post by: Squidusa on May 07, 2011, 07:10:35 PM
:lutra:

(a good night's sleep first for me.. you and schleed should get some too, I think)

Don't dodge the question , answer me.

You make a statement on here be prepared to be called out on it , and then back it up.

I ask again , what is your problem with me?

I don't think lutra wants to answer you because you dodge women. :zoinks:

Aren't you meant to be leaving?  :lol:
Title: Re: Lutra , please explain yourself.
Post by: midlifeaspie on May 07, 2011, 09:25:13 PM
:lutra:

(a good night's sleep first for me.. you and schleed should get some too, I think)

Don't dodge the question , answer me.

You make a statement on here be prepared to be called out on it , and then back it up.

I ask again , what is your problem with me?

I don't think lutra wants to answer you because you dodge women. :zoinks:

I thought you left
Title: Re: Lutra , please explain yourself.
Post by: DukeNukem on May 07, 2011, 09:28:18 PM
I'll leave... when I get damn well ready, skippy-eats-a-dicks. :wanker:
Title: Re: Lutra , please explain yourself.
Post by: Squidusa on May 07, 2011, 09:32:17 PM
I'll leave... when I get damn well ready, skippy-eats-a-dicks. :wanker:

What the fuck was that?
Thats a crap insult even by your standards.
Title: Re: Lutra , please explain yourself.
Post by: Semicolon on May 07, 2011, 09:33:54 PM
I'll leave... when I get damn well ready, skippy-eats-a-dicks. :wanker:

What the fuck was that?
Thats a crap insult even by your standards.

Indeed. Pentagram's the one who looks like a one-man rainbow party. :hahaha:
Title: Re: Lutra , please explain yourself.
Post by: ProfessorFarnsworth on May 07, 2011, 09:35:06 PM
I'll leave... when I get damn well ready, skippy-eats-a-dicks. :wanker:

What the fuck was that?
Thats a crap insult even by your standards.

What standards?
Title: Re: Lutra , please explain yourself.
Post by: DukeNukem on May 07, 2011, 09:35:19 PM
Skippy is your nickname, Squid. You hop on one leg and get your ass penetrated.
Title: Re: Lutra , please explain yourself.
Post by: Squidusa on May 07, 2011, 09:39:43 PM
Skippy is your nickname, Squid. You hop on one leg and get your ass penetrated.

Do you ever fail to look the pathetic waste of space you are?

I mean really , how much more idiotic can you get?
Just do yourself a favour and get run over again.  :zoinks:

I'll leave... when I get damn well ready, skippy-eats-a-dicks. :wanker:

What the fuck was that?
Thats a crap insult even by your standards.

What standards?

Good point.  :laugh:
Title: Re: Lutra , please explain yourself.
Post by: Al Swearegen on May 07, 2011, 09:50:01 PM
Skippy is your nickname, Squid. You hop on one leg and get your ass penetrated.

I don't remember that episode.

(http://glengarrypedia.wikispaces.com/file/view/Skippy-dvd.jpg/30229547/Skippy-dvd.jpg)

I think you are making up stories duke. Besides aren't you leaving or getting committed or something? If you are after a qualified opinion as to your mental sate you won't be able to get it from us. I will let you know that I think you are batshit crazy...if it helps.
Title: Re: Lutra , please explain yourself.
Post by: midlifeaspie on May 07, 2011, 09:51:50 PM
I'll leave... when I get damn well ready, skippy-eats-a-dicks. :wanker:

I don't want to clutter up this thread with this back and forth.  I'll make another.
Title: Re: Lutra , please explain yourself.
Post by: Squidusa on May 08, 2011, 05:56:17 AM
:chicken: :sexymush: :zzz: :yawn:
Title: Re: Lutra , please explain yourself.
Post by: lutra on May 08, 2011, 06:18:52 AM
I just think it's really low to go for a vulnerable person, seek for his weak spots, poke him there and then when the dude's 'down' keep on kicking him.

Well. I'm in no way defending what Penty did but what schleed did by posting that stupid photo on other fora is truly low.

Schleed is just a cowardly midget, IMO.
Title: Re: Lutra , please explain yourself.
Post by: Squidusa on May 08, 2011, 06:30:22 AM
I just think it's really low to go for a vulnerable person, seek for his weak spots, poke him there and then when the dude's 'down' keep on kicking him.

Well. I'm in no way defending what Penty did but what schleed did by posting that stupid photo on other fora is truly low.

Schleed is just a cowardly midget, IMO.

Right you think it's low to go after someone who said this?

Getting kind of difficult to hold your boy down while raping him in the ass, eh Sir Les? :orly:

You know fuck all about the situation Lutra , stop trying to preach about something you know nothing about.
Thanks.  :hahaha:
Title: Re: Lutra , please explain yourself.
Post by: Squidusa on May 08, 2011, 06:39:08 AM
Straight after posting this , you went offline , takes one to know one I guess?

Considering how you labeled everyone who goes into the chatroom a "coward" , I'm starting to think Schleed was right about you.
You DO have your head rammed up your arse.

Pathetic.  :thumbdn:
Title: Re: Lutra , please explain yourself.
Post by: lutra on May 08, 2011, 06:50:37 AM
That's you assuming there. I just woke up, opened I², read stuff, posted something and went for some food..

Know not all about what went on earlier, no.. should I?

Schleed has no idea who often double standard he goes. You're saying that posting penty's pic on other fora is cool/okay? Well, I think it's really low and
deliberately knifing someone in the back.
Title: Re: Lutra , please explain yourself.
Post by: Squidusa on May 08, 2011, 06:58:00 AM
That's you assuming there. I just woke up, opened I², read stuff, posted something and went for some food..

Know not all about what went on earlier, no.. should I?

Schleed has no idea who often double standard he goes. You're saying that posting penty's pic on other fora is cool/okay? Well, I think it's really low and
deliberately knifing someone in the back.

And making comments like that about peoples kids is Ok?

Yes you should know about stuff like that , especially how you branded myself and Schleed a coward without fully understanding the situation.
and ok fair enough you went off to get some food, I take that back.

Exactly , what gives you the right to tell us we are wrong in our handling of Pentagram btw?
Go read his former posts , maybe then you'll understand , it just seems like you want an excuse to sneer at people right now.
Title: Re: Lutra , please explain yourself.
Post by: lutra on May 08, 2011, 07:17:27 AM
I seek no excuse to sneer at people. Look at most of my posts here.. I carry no knife and hardly ever poke a stick at folks.

Well, I know penty posted bizarre stuff before and he's not the sharpest knife in, let's say, the drawer but to me the lowness yesterday was purely kicking
someone when he's already on the floor.

You copying his photo here I have little trouble with but schleed went a step further and made it almost impossible for penty to go to those fora again. A direct aim for the heart.

I don't know why penty did such a stupid thing with the photo but again I think schleed proved what a vicious fuck he really is.
Title: Re: Lutra , please explain yourself.
Post by: Squidusa on May 08, 2011, 07:32:30 AM
I seek no excuse to sneer at people. Look at most of my posts here.. I carry no knife and hardly ever poke a stick at folks.

I beg to differ ,  you have used the "cowarly" rhetoric before , I'm not entirely convinced you don't think you are better than everyone else here.

Well, I know penty posted bizarre stuff before and he's not the sharpest knife in, let's say, the drawer but to me the lowness yesterday was purely kicking
someone when he's already on the floor.

Penty's situation isn't as bad as he makes it out , he constantly whines , blames his bad behaviour on his poor upbringing.
I know for a fact several members here were abused as kids FAR worse than Penty , yet they have remained decent people , Penty has no excuse sorry but no.

He throws himself onto the floor , and kicks and screams like a child , every kick that is aimed at him , is well desered after the shit he's posted.

You copying his photo here I have little trouble with but schleed went a step further and made it almost impossible for penty to go to those fora again. A direct aim for the heart.

[Sat 18:48] <lutra> You're both are first class cowards.. and we accept..
[Sat 18:40] <lutra>   You, squiddy fag and schleed.. are alike, we think..

If thats the case , why did you say that then? , I'm not particularly bothered by what you said , I am however puzzeled as to why you said it.
Besides , thats the internet , if you post n00dz , expect bad stuff to happen , it may not be right but , penty would do this with someone elses nudes , infact he did that with (what he thought was) Butterflies nudes
And she is one of the few members who is nice to him on this site , do you still think he doesn't deserve it?

I don't know why penty did such a stupid thing with the photo but again I think schleed proved what a vicious fuck he really is.

Schleed is Schleed , he will do and say what he thinks , and if you don't like it he won't particularly care.
Schleed is vicious to those who deserve it I think, I've never seen him act without a reason to.

But think what you will , it strikes me that you and him have some long standing vendetta.
Title: Re: Lutra , please explain yourself.
Post by: Frolic_Fun on May 08, 2011, 07:37:34 AM
I think Lutra is projecting when it comes to this cowardly shite. Especially when dodging questions.

He has a problem with me because I trolled him and Dino on ZOMG for being stuck up cunts. I like annoying the fucker because I personally find him dull and poking at him is the only time he's interesting.

As for pentagram, he deserved it for all the shit he did on here. I expect people to do the same if I posted my nudes here. Explain on how this is cowardly or "back stabbing", since pentagram knew right well that I'd do something. Sadly it isn't enough to drive him out of i2, since the cunt is like some dried up spunk stain that can't be washed off easily.

PS. Be lucky I don't know any of your relatives email addresses, I would've sent the nudes to them aswell.
Title: Re: Lutra , please explain yourself.
Post by: lutra on May 08, 2011, 08:02:59 AM
When I came here I was pretty open-minded about you schleed. I know we clashed a bit on Zomg but you brought that old shite up again as soon as I shouted something here.

And I'm not at all like dino of course.

I don't care what you think of me. A stuck up cunt? Cowardly? Just think you act all tough and post a lot of hateful stuff. Yeah, this is the internetz but..
wonder why you have that need? You seem to really enjoy it too.

Well, not to start repeating myself here. Just don't like it when a couple of folks go after some one that vulnerable. How cool is that?

Maybe dodging something again.. say what questions then?

(oh, edit, for I cowardly going away now.. have stuff to do.. be back later though.. )
Title: Re: Lutra , please explain yourself.
Post by: Frolic_Fun on May 08, 2011, 08:10:37 AM
I don't care what you think of me. A stuck up cunt? Cowardly? Just think you act all tough and post a lot of hateful stuff. Yeah, this is the internetz but..
wonder why you have that need? You seem to really enjoy it too.

I'm actually more tame since the past year. I haven't even bothered you much apart from a few snarky comments, but you come in with guns blazing and accusing people of cowardice and back stabbing. That gets my attention.

Quote
Well, not to start repeating myself here. Just don't like it when a couple of folks go after some one that vulnerable. How cool is that?

I suggest you read more before you draw such conclusions. Pentagram is an attention whore, not a vulnerable person.

Quote
(maybe dodging something again.. say what questions then?)

Yes you're still dodging. Read the thread for the questions.
Title: Re: Lutra , please explain yourself.
Post by: Squidusa on May 08, 2011, 08:19:24 AM
Quote
Well, not to start repeating myself here. Just don't like it when a couple of folks go after some one that vulnerable. How cool is that?

I suggest you read more before you draw such conclusions. Pentagram is an attention whore, not a vulnerable person.

 :agreed:
Title: Re: Lutra , please explain yourself.
Post by: Adam on May 08, 2011, 08:31:14 AM
I'm not being funny but pentagram MUST have known what the consequences of posting that pic would be

Anyone who's been on the internet for five minutes (well on forums etc) should know that something like that will happen

Now someone like pentagram DEFINITELY should know. He posted it looking for attention, he's getting attention
Title: Re: Lutra , please explain yourself.
Post by: lutra on May 08, 2011, 02:07:20 PM
I understand he's an attention seeker.. but in a way we all are to some extent.. posting on a forum. Okay, he thinks he's funny posting
some really stupid shite here and yeah, I think he's really vulnerable not realizing what his actions may effect.

Dodging questions? Central question here is me calling you cowards, I think.. um, why I did so? Well, think I answered it a couple of times already.

Well, Penty is, in my view, quite a vulnerable kiddo. Too stupid mostly to see what's coming after insulting people (a bit like me here maybe even).
A couple of folks got gradually more and more offended and addressed that towards him. Which is fine of course.. but it became 'lots' against one and..
not cool, in my perception. Think he gradually lost it and sank deeper due to this.

The cowardice mentioned was when I thought it became unfair and some brought some heavy armoury to the scene. Several folks tried to hunt him
down and posting the picture on some other sites he posts is, IMO, a cowardy act.

Bet, harming him quite substantially.

High horse and all but I remain seeing it as a lousy and low act.

~

Quote
squiddy: I ask again, what is your problem with me?

Thought you were quite funny at first and still I have no huge problem with you mostly but you went vicious on the boy, like schleed did too and it felt..
unjust or something.

~

Stuck up/snobbish? (like schleed likes to call me/it) Well, maybe.. but don't see how this differs that much from you.. you do the same thing man.
In fact, thinking about it, I think 'do this' a great deal more than I do. (look at your thread about your opinions about several nations and its inhabitants..
that's stuck up cunty²)

~

Quote
squiddy: I'm not entirely convinced you don't think you are better than everyone else here.
Well, honestly I don't feel that way.
Must see this in a action/reaction kinda way. I gave my reaction. 

~

Quote
schleed: You come in with guns blazing and accusing people of cowardice and back stabbing.
Think you went gun blazing and back stabbing with penty, schleed. In yeah, a cowardly manner.. posting penty's stupid pic on other fora.
Think you felt really cool and funny doing that.

Well, blahiah, meh..
Title: Re: Lutra , please explain yourself.
Post by: Frolic_Fun on May 08, 2011, 02:12:32 PM
I understand he's an attention seeker.. but in a way we all are to some extent.. posting on a forum. Okay, he thinks he's funny posting
some really stupid shite here and yeah, I think he's really vulnerable not realizing what his actions may effect.

Dodging questions? Central question here is me calling you cowards, I think.. um, why I did so? Well, think I answered it a couple of times already.

Well, Penty is, in my view, quite a vulnerable kiddo. Too stupid mostly to see what's coming after insulting people (a bit like me here maybe even).
A couple of folks got gradually more and more offended and addressed that towards him. Which is fine of course.. but it became 'lots' against one and..
not cool, in my perception. Think he gradually lost it and sank deeper due to this.

The cowardice mentioned was when I thought it became unfair and some brought some heavy armoury to the scene. Several folks tried to hunt him
down and posting the picture on some other sites he posts is, IMO, a cowardy act.

Bet, harming him quite substantially.

High horse and all but I remain seeing it as a lousy and low act.

Okay, you're backpedaling a bit I see.

Quote
Think you went gun blazing and back stabbing with penty, schleed. In yeah, a cowardly manner.. posting penty's stupid pic on other fora.
Think you felt really cool and funny doing that.

Well, blahiah, meh..

He posted it here, so he got what was expected. I still don't think it's cowardly to exercise the consequences of posting nudes on the internet.
Title: Re: Lutra , please explain yourself.
Post by: Squidusa on May 08, 2011, 02:22:53 PM
I understand he's an attention seeker.. but in a way we all are to some extent.. posting on a forum. Okay, he thinks he's funny posting
some really stupid shite here and yeah, I think he's really vulnerable not realizing what his actions may effect.

If thats the case , why has he admitted to attention whoring on several occasions?
I'm sure I can dig up some quotes if needs be.

Dodging questions? Central question here is me calling you cowards, I think.. um, why I did so? Well, think I answered it a couple of times already.

You're making the assumption we all planned to gang up on him though.
look through posting history you will see that we have all called him out on his behaviour before.

Well, Penty is, in my view, quite a vulnerable kiddo. Too stupid mostly to see what's coming after insulting people (a bit like me here maybe even).
A couple of folks got gradually more and more offended and addressed that towards him. Which is fine of course.. but it became 'lots' against one and..
not cool, in my perception. Think he gradually lost it and sank deeper due to this.  

So would you prefer we all stayed quiet and let him get on with his shit?

The cowardice mentioned was when I thought it became unfair and some brought some heavy armoury to the scene. Several folks tried to hunt him
down and posting the picture on some other sites he posts is, IMO, a cowardy act.

Wrong , Cowardice would be keeping quiet to keep the peace , the "heavy armoury" was what he posted , if he's going to try an attention whore with things like that , someone is going to use it.

Bet, harming him quite substantially

High horse and all but I remain seeing it as a lousy and low act.

Not really , he can't go to a few forums now and 4Chan , it's not like it's on his CV.




Thought you were quite funny at first and still I have no huge problem with you mostly but you went vicious on the boy, like schleed did too and it felt..
unjust or something.

Call me unjust all you like , I don't particularly care , I am vicious to those who I feel deserve it.
When you make comments like the comments he made about Sir Les's son I will be unpleaseant.

Not only because it is not right to bring children in , but I have "met" Sir Les's son before and the fact that poor boy was used by Pentagram as ammunition , enfuriates me.

~
Stuck up/snobbish? (like schleed likes to call me/it) Well, maybe.. but don't see how this differs that much from you.. you do the same thing man.
In fact, thinking about it, I think 'do this' a great deal more than I do. (look at your thread about your opinions about several nations and its inhabitants..
that's stuck up cunty²)

Not sure who you're addressing here , but I don't see how I've made comments about several nations and inhabitants.


Thank you for asnwering Lutra.
Title: Re: Lutra , please explain yourself.
Post by: lutra on May 08, 2011, 02:41:34 PM
^
Last there was meant towards schleed. He started such thread.. just mentioned it as an example..

And no schleed. You asked for a reply. No backpedaling here, just explaining.

Think I've pretty much said what I had to but maybe reply a bit more later on but.. yeah, later on.

(See? He chickens out.. No man, there's just other stuff than this thread)
Title: Re: Lutra , please explain yourself.
Post by: Squidusa on May 08, 2011, 02:48:05 PM
^
Last there was meant towards schleed. He started such thread.. just mentioned it as an example..

Ok then.
Title: Re: Lutra , please explain yourself.
Post by: Frolic_Fun on May 08, 2011, 03:15:19 PM
I have no idea what you're talking about when it comes to me "starting threads". ??? And also you softened your stance in the last post that I quoted, hence the backpedaling.

Quote
(See? He chickens out.. No man, there's just other stuff than this thread)

 ???

Explain yourself.
Title: Re: Lutra , please explain yourself.
Post by: midlifeaspie on May 08, 2011, 07:44:42 PM
I know this is bad form, but this callout already has 4 participants so I will go ahead and add a 5th.

What did Squiddy do that got him labeled a "coward" that went beyond what I did, and earned no such label in the process?
Title: Re: Lutra , please explain yourself.
Post by: Osensitive1 on May 08, 2011, 07:51:03 PM
Understood that to be about re-posting the picture, though also seemed to be retracted.
Title: Re: Lutra , please explain yourself.
Post by: Squidusa on May 08, 2011, 07:59:04 PM
Understood that to be about re-posting the picture, though also seemed to be retracted.

I didn't even re-post it though thats the stupid part.

Pentagram posted a link in the "Bitchtits" thread , I clicked it , nearly threw up , saved the pic , showed it on the thread and deleted it again.

Schleed's posted it several times but I fail to see how it's "cowardly"
Title: Re: Lutra , please explain yourself.
Post by: Osensitive1 on May 08, 2011, 08:08:28 PM
I didn't even re-post it though thats the stupid part.
Have only noticed it reposted here once, and you're right; it wasn't you. Then yes, good question, Hubert.
Title: Re: Lutra , please explain yourself.
Post by: Squidusa on May 08, 2011, 08:10:17 PM
I didn't even re-post it though thats the stupid part.
Have only noticed it reposted here once, and you're right; it wasn't you. Then yes, good question, Hubert.

It does seem that Lutra is tying me to the same brush as Schleed (or however the expression goes)
Title: Re: Lutra , please explain yourself.
Post by: midlifeaspie on May 08, 2011, 08:12:36 PM
I didn't even re-post it though thats the stupid part.
Have only noticed it reposted here once, and you're right; it wasn't you. Then yes, good question, Hubert.

It does seem that Lutra is tying me to the same brush as Schleed (or however the expression goes)

It seems personal, that is why I asked.  While you made fun of him, I went for his jugular.
Title: Re: Lutra , please explain yourself.
Post by: Squidusa on May 08, 2011, 08:13:17 PM
I didn't even re-post it though thats the stupid part.
Have only noticed it reposted here once, and you're right; it wasn't you. Then yes, good question, Hubert.

It does seem that Lutra is tying me to the same brush as Schleed (or however the expression goes)

It seems personal, that is why I asked.  While you made fun of him, I went for his jugular.

True.  :laugh:
Title: Re: Lutra , please explain yourself.
Post by: 'Butterflies' on May 08, 2011, 08:27:54 PM
I didn't even re-post it though thats the stupid part.
Have only noticed it reposted here once, and you're right; it wasn't you. Then yes, good question, Hubert.

It does seem that Lutra is tying me to the same brush as Schleed (or however the expression goes)

 :lol:

It's tarring you with the same brush :P
Title: Re: Lutra , please explain yourself.
Post by: Celticgoddess on May 08, 2011, 08:30:55 PM

I didn't even re-post it though thats the stupid part.
Have only noticed it reposted here once, and you're right; it wasn't you. Then yes, good question, Hubert.

It does seem that Lutra is tying me to the same brush as Schleed (or however the expression goes)

 :lol:

It's tarring you with the same brush :P
In Canada it's painting you with the same brush :laugh:
Title: Re: Lutra , please explain yourself.
Post by: Squidusa on May 08, 2011, 08:35:48 PM
I didn't even re-post it though thats the stupid part.
Have only noticed it reposted here once, and you're right; it wasn't you. Then yes, good question, Hubert.

It does seem that Lutra is tying me to the same brush as Schleed (or however the expression goes)

 :lol:

It's tarring you with the same brush :P

Oh.  :-[

Well you know what I mean  :laugh:
Title: Re: Lutra , please explain yourself.
Post by: Queen Victoria on May 08, 2011, 09:41:14 PM
I didn't even re-post it though thats the stupid part.
Have only noticed it reposted here once, and you're right; it wasn't you. Then yes, good question, Hubert.

It does seem that Lutra is tying me to the same brush as Schleed (or however the expression goes)

 :lol:

It's tarring you with the same brush :P

Oh.  :-[

Well you know what I mean  :laugh:

Lose the brushes, let's wallpaper Lutra.  (It's a joke Lutra on painting a wall vs wallpapering and a saracastic solution to whether it's tarring or painting.  No offense to you.)
Title: Re: Lutra , please explain yourself.
Post by: Semicolon on May 08, 2011, 10:38:47 PM
I didn't even re-post it though thats the stupid part.
Have only noticed it reposted here once, and you're right; it wasn't you. Then yes, good question, Hubert.

It does seem that Lutra is tying me to the same brush as Schleed (or however the expression goes)

 :lol:

It's tarring you with the same brush :P

Oh.  :-[

Well you know what I mean  :laugh:

Lose the brushes, let's wallpaper Lutra.  (It's a joke Lutra on painting a wall vs wallpapering and a saracastic solution to whether it's tarring or painting.  No offense to you.)

We should tar and feather the British with the same brush! :soapbox:
Title: Re: Lutra , please explain yourself.
Post by: Squidusa on May 09, 2011, 03:50:57 AM
I didn't even re-post it though thats the stupid part.
Have only noticed it reposted here once, and you're right; it wasn't you. Then yes, good question, Hubert.

It does seem that Lutra is tying me to the same brush as Schleed (or however the expression goes)

 :lol:

It's tarring you with the same brush :P

Oh.  :-[

Well you know what I mean  :laugh:

Lose the brushes, let's wallpaper Lutra.  (It's a joke Lutra on painting a wall vs wallpapering and a saracastic solution to whether it's tarring or painting.  No offense to you.)

We should tar and feather the British with the same brush! :soapbox:

Using a european for of punishment?

I thought americans were supposed to be original?  :zoinks: :zoinks: :zoinks:
Title: Re: Lutra , please explain yourself.
Post by: Al Swearegen on May 09, 2011, 06:12:04 AM
OK things are a little unbalanced in this callout so let me lead in on Lutra's side a bit.

Let's be a bit introspective here. Are we "cliquey"?
Do we target people that we don't like collectively or do we all target them individually out of loathing "together" and at the same time?
Do we dislike the same people or do foster a need to dislike the same people and reciprocate?
Do we not fight between ourselves because we have a pact not to do so or because we genuinely agree with each other?

I honestly thing that these questions are coming to the fore in both this thread and in other threads.

Penty, Richard, General Razorbeard, Sol and a plethora of other casualties throughout I2 history, were they targeted systematically and driven out by a cliquey bullying mob?

I will answer for me and this is all I can answer for. A lot of the people that I like are liked by a lot of the people I like and they like me. They same applies in reverse. A lot of the values I hold dear and opinions I hold true are similarly (it seems) held by the people I like here (to degrees).

I rally against opinions I don't like and behaviours I don't like. I am reactive and it is my nature.

To get an idea of how "I" feel a look at the callout with Odeon and my defence of Penty's actions and railing against Richard's is an example.
Paraphrased, I say to Odeon that were Part's to post an avatar of a giant arsehole or Callaway was to post an avatar of a giant vagina, you can bet I would be just as pissed off and expressive about it. The fact that it was Richard doing this was not so much the reason for targeting this or many of his actions or behaviours. But the actions and behaviours themselves.

I don't rail against people who don't provide reason for me to rail against them. Part's and Callaway would not likely be the type of people to post such things. Nor would they be the type of people to suggest pedophilic relationships with my and my kids. Were they to, they would earn my disgust and my ire.

I can't answer for others but taking this into account, this is how I see things. Similar people with similar intelligence and maturity and values getting similarly offended or disapproving of similar shit and reacting in ways that make it known what they think and not in a way that is cliquey or a united from but many one on ones and agreeing where someone makes what they concede is a good point. That in my book is not cliquey or mobbish.

I am personally not afraid to let anyone know how I feel about anything and many karma points have been thrown both Richards and Penty's way for things I agreed with. I think in the entire time I have been here I have distributed 4 gheys (average of 1/year). I sure as hell don't have a problem praising for what I consider praiseworthy with someone I don't like or in turn finding a point of contention with someone I like.

That is just me answering for me and I don't know how other's feel.

Am I right in saying that just maybe what Lutra sees or feels is not a bad interpretation regardless of whether he is right or wrong in this.
Title: Re: Lutra , please explain yourself.
Post by: Squidusa on May 09, 2011, 06:17:37 AM
Oh god another essay.  :lol:

I get what you mean , I'm personally not rallying against penty (me and soph did team up to spam his threads and psycho ghey him , yes but not to push him to annoy him)
I'm just stating my views , I still don't get how Lutra views me as "cowardly" , I'm not too bothered if he wants to have that opinion so be it.  :dunno:

I don't think it's a bad interpretation Lutra has but it's certainly mis-directed.
Title: Re: Lutra , please explain yourself.
Post by: RageBeoulve on May 09, 2011, 06:25:14 AM
Looks to me like lutra just got drunk and talked a little shit. I do it all the time guys. Whats the beef?
Title: Re: Lutra , please explain yourself.
Post by: Squidusa on May 09, 2011, 06:27:47 AM
Looks to me like lutra just got drunk and talked a little shit. I do it all the time guys. Whats the beef?


He said something mean :bigcry:

 :P

But seriously , I asked him to clarify what he meant , he didn't so I called him out.
Title: Re: Lutra , please explain yourself.
Post by: Al Swearegen on May 09, 2011, 06:27:57 AM
Yeah remember what I was saying about difference of opinion and variety. Maybe he has the wrong end of the stick and maybe not. Like Rissy I give him  :thumbup: for making a claim and backing himself.

The other thing Squiddy is I have known you from 14 years old I don't for a moment think you to be a cliquey, cowardly bully. Lutra hasn't had the pleasure.
Title: Re: Lutra , please explain yourself.
Post by: Al Swearegen on May 09, 2011, 06:56:58 AM
Saw this posted elsewhere

It is amusing how everyone decides to hate someone at the same time on here.
Has it even occurred to you that it is possible for people to arrive at the same conclusion, in this case that FA is a douche, without consulting each other?

Its easy to gang up in a pack.  I'm sure some people do it on here, cause they didn't have the balls to stick up to bullies in their life at some point, so its their way of retribution  :orly:
That may be correct, but it did not answer my question to you. Has it even occurred to you that it is possible for people to arrive at the same conclusion, in this case that FA is a douche, without consulting each other? Now to get back to what you said about people ganging up in a pack. 

Do you believe that if a person acts like such a complete fucktard that they alienate most, if not all, other members here that the result of that person being despised across the board should be that no one dares to call them a fucktard for behaving as a fucktard?

This supports what I was saying a couple of essays posts back
Title: Re: Lutra , please explain yourself.
Post by: eris on May 09, 2011, 07:07:40 AM
well, truth is I do think we are a bit cliquey, all of us a bit

but we let others in it seems, and accept people into this clique

I dont see it is bullying, and just certain people agreeing with each other

we are the aspie elite, right ?
Title: Re: Lutra , please explain yourself.
Post by: TheoK on May 09, 2011, 07:08:29 AM
 :agreed: :viking:
Title: Re: Lutra , please explain yourself.
Post by: Al Swearegen on May 09, 2011, 09:36:36 AM
well, truth is I do think we are a bit cliquey, all of us a bit

but we let others in it seems, and accept people into this clique

I dont see it is bullying, and just certain people agreeing with each other

we are the aspie elite, right ?

I am Uber-spazz hear me roar!
Title: Re: Lutra , please explain yourself.
Post by: RageBeoulve on May 09, 2011, 09:39:11 AM
I think forming cliques is a healthy behavior.
Title: Re: Lutra , please explain yourself.
Post by: Frolic_Fun on May 09, 2011, 09:56:32 AM
It's part of out social nature to form cliques. People like to think that they can form opinions and such without the influence of others, but we sadly do all the time, even when we don't realise it.

However, there is a difference between being part of a clique and ganging up on someone without question of why the person is hated. We have a very clear reason to dislike Pentagram, there is no "oh I must hate him because everyone else does". It would be like that if he did nothing wrong, but sadly he came here and acted like some pathetic manchild.
Title: Re: Lutra , please explain yourself.
Post by: Al Swearegen on May 09, 2011, 09:59:11 AM
It's part of out social nature to form cliques. People like to think that they can form opinions and such without the influence of others, but we sadly do all the time, even when we don't realise it.

However, there is a difference between being part of a clique and ganging up on someone without question of why the person is hated. We have a very clear reason to dislike Pentagram, there is no "oh I must hate him because everyone else does". It would be like that if he did nothing wrong, but sadly he came here and acted like some pathetic manchild.

I think he is hated individually and attacked individually (even if it is by many people who dislike him). That is my reading.
Title: Re: Lutra , please explain yourself.
Post by: RageBeoulve on May 09, 2011, 10:13:14 AM
It's part of out social nature to form cliques. People like to think that they can form opinions and such without the influence of others, but we sadly do all the time, even when we don't realise it.

However, there is a difference between being part of a clique and ganging up on someone without question of why the person is hated. We have a very clear reason to dislike Pentagram, there is no "oh I must hate him because everyone else does". It would be like that if he did nothing wrong, but sadly he came here and acted like some pathetic manchild.

Its normal to rebuff someone when they repeatedly annoy you, in other words?
Title: Re: Lutra , please explain yourself.
Post by: Callaway on May 09, 2011, 12:21:28 PM
It's part of out social nature to form cliques. People like to think that they can form opinions and such without the influence of others, but we sadly do all the time, even when we don't realise it.

However, there is a difference between being part of a clique and ganging up on someone without question of why the person is hated. We have a very clear reason to dislike Pentagram, there is no "oh I must hate him because everyone else does". It would be like that if he did nothing wrong, but sadly he came here and acted like some pathetic manchild.

I think that he has done a lot of dumb stuff for negative attention and posting that horrible picture of himself was a very dumb thing for him to do, as was his pedophilic comment about Sir Les and his son.  I think that posting about jacking off to a picture of an actress in red lipstick who was underage when that picture was taken was another mistake, but I don't think that he actually knew she was underage when he jacked off to her picture.  I can certainly see how many different people could individually have various grievances about him, but I still think that reposting his horrible picture on other sites he visits was a low blow.
Title: Re: Lutra , please explain yourself.
Post by: eris on May 09, 2011, 12:33:41 PM
One thing I like about this website is how willing you all are to accept new people. I mean, not LAME new people, but you all give people a chance and actually talk to noobs

you are were so nice to ME when I joined, and I was a total wackjob

most forums would just ignore new ppl

, and anywhere else would react to pentys meltdowns in a similar way I think, just with less " give a shit" about it.
Title: Re: Lutra , please explain yourself.
Post by: Squidusa on May 09, 2011, 01:32:22 PM
One thing I like about this website is how willing you all are to accept new people. I mean, not LAME new people, but you all give people a chance and actually talk to noobs

you are were so nice to ME when I joined, and I was a total wackjob

most forums would just ignore new ppl

, and anywhere else would react to pentys meltdowns in a similar way I think, just with less " give a shit" about it.

To be fair you were one of the more interesting noobs  :laugh:
Not many people mention fucking dead people in their introduction.  :lol:

But yeah . everyone is more honest here generally.
Title: Re: Lutra , please explain yourself.
Post by: Semicolon on May 09, 2011, 01:33:53 PM
One thing I like about this website is how willing you all are to accept new people. I mean, not LAME new people, but you all give people a chance and actually talk to noobs

you are were so nice to ME when I joined, and I was a total wackjob

most forums would just ignore new ppl

, and anywhere else would react to pentys meltdowns in a similar way I think, just with less " give a shit" about it.

Was? ???
Title: Re: Lutra , please explain yourself.
Post by: Al Swearegen on May 10, 2011, 03:49:44 AM
It's part of out social nature to form cliques. People like to think that they can form opinions and such without the influence of others, but we sadly do all the time, even when we don't realise it.

However, there is a difference between being part of a clique and ganging up on someone without question of why the person is hated. We have a very clear reason to dislike Pentagram, there is no "oh I must hate him because everyone else does". It would be like that if he did nothing wrong, but sadly he came here and acted like some pathetic manchild.

I think that he has done a lot of dumb stuff for negative attention and posting that horrible picture of himself was a very dumb thing for him to do, as was his pedophilic comment about Sir Les and his son.  I think that posting about jacking off to a picture of an actress in red lipstick who was underage when that picture was taken was another mistake, but I don't think that he actually knew she was underage when he jacked off to her picture.  I can certainly see how many different people could individually have various grievances about him, but I still think that reposting his horrible picture on other sites he visits was a low blow.

I say live by the sword and die by the sword.
Title: Re: Lutra , please explain yourself.
Post by: Squidusa on May 10, 2011, 04:57:14 AM
It's part of out social nature to form cliques. People like to think that they can form opinions and such without the influence of others, but we sadly do all the time, even when we don't realise it.

However, there is a difference between being part of a clique and ganging up on someone without question of why the person is hated. We have a very clear reason to dislike Pentagram, there is no "oh I must hate him because everyone else does". It would be like that if he did nothing wrong, but sadly he came here and acted like some pathetic manchild.

I think that he has done a lot of dumb stuff for negative attention and posting that horrible picture of himself was a very dumb thing for him to do, as was his pedophilic comment about Sir Les and his son.  I think that posting about jacking off to a picture of an actress in red lipstick who was underage when that picture was taken was another mistake, but I don't think that he actually knew she was underage when he jacked off to her picture.  I can certainly see how many different people could individually have various grievances about him, but I still think that reposting his horrible picture on other sites he visits was a low blow.

I say live by the sword and die by the sword.

 :agreed:

Lets be honest here , Schleed has had many oppurtunities to spread Dook's photo of him flashing his manboobs around, which I don't think he did outside of this site.
Dook did not learn from last time and posted that picture for attention , everyonoe knows what Schleed is like (not a criticism despite how it sounded  :P) , Pentagram especially, he took the risk it's fair game I guess.  :dunno:

^ and before I get called out on how I behaved with Eclair , considering the circumstances with Eclair I think there is a massive difference IMO.