Mass shootings can't happen in Germany because of gun control.

[Yuri Bezmenov]

On a much happier note. Whilst the Swedes seem to have it figured that gun control is responsible for the latest shooting in Germany, the Swedes have worked out why they have been "the rape capital of the world"
http://www.expressen.se/kvallsposten/forklaringen-till-vagen-av-valdtakter-i-sommar/

I just heard there was another terrorist attack in Germany, this time 12 people. Wasn't a gun this time. It was a bomb. I think we can cite furniture as behind this attack.

Is there an English translation of this somewhere??

[odeon]

On a much happier note. Whilst the Swedes seem to have it figured that gun control is responsible for the latest shooting in Germany, the Swedes have worked out why they have been "the rape capital of the world"
http://www.expressen.se/kvallsposten/forklaringen-till-vagen-av-valdtakter-i-sommar/

I just heard there was another terrorist attack in Germany, this time 12 people. Wasn't a gun this time. It was a bomb. I think we can cite furniture as behind this attack.

You're such a sad case, Al. Your butthurt knows no limits.

['andersom']

A loner, a quiet teen, a kid with psychological problems, a teen obsessed with mass shootings, especially the one done by Breivik.

It's only waiting for the verdict that he was autistic. The other kind of dangerous people.

A Muslim man screaming "Allahu akbar" before killing innocents and the German media being unable to imply a radical Muslim extremist narrative, instead chose to infer a relationship with Breivik, the far right wing terrorist. I can understand why the Liberal Media in the Liberal Germany would do that. Doesn't mean I will not see that there was possibly a little bit of both.

What I read in Dutch and German news is that this shooting was not IS related. "Amokläufer".

If I were IS, I'd claim anything I could get away with. Anything to spread the fear. That's what they want, and they are pretty good at it, so far.

That there are IS related attacks is beyond doubt. That that needs attention too. That there are other shootings and attacks is also clear. Blaming all on IS would make the world delightfully clear, with good and bad, god and devil. The world is not that clear. The lone shooters/car drivers/ etc will be part of our world and will go undetected till they do their deeds.

(With the car I am not referring to the truck in Nice, but to Apeldoorn, 2009)

[Al Swearegen]

A loner, a quiet teen, a kid with psychological problems, a teen obsessed with mass shootings, especially the one done by Breivik.

It's only waiting for the verdict that he was autistic. The other kind of dangerous people.

A Muslim man screaming "Allahu akbar" before killing innocents and the German media being unable to imply a radical Muslim extremist narrative, instead chose to infer a relationship with Breivik, the far right wing terrorist. I can understand why the Liberal Media in the Liberal Germany would do that. Doesn't mean I will not see that there was possibly a little bit of both.

What I read in Dutch and German news is that this shooting was not IS related. "Amokläufer".

If I were IS, I'd claim anything I could get away with. Anything to spread the fear. That's what they want, and they are pretty good at it, so far.

That there are IS related attacks is beyond doubt. That that needs attention too. That there are other shootings and attacks is also clear. Blaming all on IS would make the world delightfully clear, with good and bad, god and devil. The world is not that clear. The lone shooters/car drivers/ etc will be part of our world and will go undetected till they do their deeds.

(With the car I am not referring to the truck in Nice, but to Apeldoorn, 2009)

I do not think people ARE blaming ALL on IS. So not sure how this holds water with what you are saying?

['andersom']

A loner, a quiet teen, a kid with psychological problems, a teen obsessed with mass shootings, especially the one done by Breivik.

It's only waiting for the verdict that he was autistic. The other kind of dangerous people.

A Muslim man screaming "Allahu akbar" before killing innocents and the German media being unable to imply a radical Muslim extremist narrative, instead chose to infer a relationship with Breivik, the far right wing terrorist. I can understand why the Liberal Media in the Liberal Germany would do that. Doesn't mean I will not see that there was possibly a little bit of both.

What I read in Dutch and German news is that this shooting was not IS related. "Amokläufer".

If I were IS, I'd claim anything I could get away with. Anything to spread the fear. That's what they want, and they are pretty good at it, so far.

That there are IS related attacks is beyond doubt. That that needs attention too. That there are other shootings and attacks is also clear. Blaming all on IS would make the world delightfully clear, with good and bad, god and devil. The world is not that clear. The lone shooters/car drivers/ etc will be part of our world and will go undetected till they do their deeds.

(With the car I am not referring to the truck in Nice, but to Apeldoorn, 2009)

I do not think people ARE blaming ALL on IS. So not sure how this holds water with what you are saying?

Germany first thought this was a terrorist attack, then they concluded it was not. Yet you say it probably is, but that Liberal Media does not want to have it so. That is what I reacted on. Germany has a history with terrorism. Germans are not fainthearted when it comes to naming something by the name it deserves. The RAF knew how to kill. They were part of the news a lot, when I was a youngster.

Further, if I were part of IS, I would make sure lots of nasty incidents were claimed by IS. Anything to spread the fear. If I were a member of IS, I would be delighted that people thought this loner was a soldier for the bloody cause.

[FourAceDeal]

... ooh wait, oops.


http://www.msn.com/en-us/news/world/multiple-deaths-at-shooting-rampage-in-german-shopping-mall/ar-BBuFw6E?li=BBmkt5R&ocid=spartandhp

Jesus Christ.  See the Japan thread for comment.  I seriously can't work out if you are joking or you really are like this.

[Al Swearegen]

A loner, a quiet teen, a kid with psychological problems, a teen obsessed with mass shootings, especially the one done by Breivik.

It's only waiting for the verdict that he was autistic. The other kind of dangerous people.

A Muslim man screaming "Allahu akbar" before killing innocents and the German media being unable to imply a radical Muslim extremist narrative, instead chose to infer a relationship with Breivik, the far right wing terrorist. I can understand why the Liberal Media in the Liberal Germany would do that. Doesn't mean I will not see that there was possibly a little bit of both.

What I read in Dutch and German news is that this shooting was not IS related. "Amokläufer".

If I were IS, I'd claim anything I could get away with. Anything to spread the fear. That's what they want, and they are pretty good at it, so far.

That there are IS related attacks is beyond doubt. That that needs attention too. That there are other shootings and attacks is also clear. Blaming all on IS would make the world delightfully clear, with good and bad, god and devil. The world is not that clear. The lone shooters/car drivers/ etc will be part of our world and will go undetected till they do their deeds.

(With the car I am not referring to the truck in Nice, but to Apeldoorn, 2009)

I do not think people ARE blaming ALL on IS. So not sure how this holds water with what you are saying?

Germany first thought this was a terrorist attack, then they concluded it was not. Yet you say it probably is, but that Liberal Media does not want to have it so. That is what I reacted on. Germany has a history with terrorism. Germans are not fainthearted when it comes to naming something by the name it deserves. The RAF knew how to kill. They were part of the news a lot, when I was a youngster.

Further, if I were part of IS, I would make sure lots of nasty incidents were claimed by IS. Anything to spread the fear. If I were a member of IS, I would be delighted that people thought this loner was a soldier for the bloody cause.

You can't be "reacting" on my comment because I have never said ALL terror attacks are. So it would make no sense at all to even infer it.

[Al Swearegen]

On a much happier note. Whilst the Swedes seem to have it figured that gun control is responsible for the latest shooting in Germany, the Swedes have worked out why they have been "the rape capital of the world"
http://www.expressen.se/kvallsposten/forklaringen-till-vagen-av-valdtakter-i-sommar/

I just heard there was another terrorist attack in Germany, this time 12 people. Wasn't a gun this time. It was a bomb. I think we can cite furniture as behind this attack.

You're such a sad case, Al. Your butthurt knows no limits.

Butthutt? By what do you imagine o am butthurt?

I understand some furniture decapitated a French Priest today. I think we can all safely rule out any suggestion of radical Muslim extremism.

[benjimanbreeg]

What media outlet are 'liberal'? 

[Jack]

What media outlet are 'liberal'?

The vast majority are here.

[odeon]

On a much happier note. Whilst the Swedes seem to have it figured that gun control is responsible for the latest shooting in Germany, the Swedes have worked out why they have been "the rape capital of the world"
http://www.expressen.se/kvallsposten/forklaringen-till-vagen-av-valdtakter-i-sommar/

I just heard there was another terrorist attack in Germany, this time 12 people. Wasn't a gun this time. It was a bomb. I think we can cite furniture as behind this attack.

You're such a sad case, Al. Your butthurt knows no limits.

Butthutt? By what do you imagine o am butthurt?

I understand some furniture decapitated a French Priest today. I think we can all safely rule out any suggestion of radical Muslim extremism.

It's either serious butthurt or you seriously like me and this is your version of pulling my hair.

Or you could simply be an idiot and think your words have merit.

[benjimanbreeg]

What media outlet are 'liberal'?

The vast majority are here.

In what way?

['andersom']

A loner, a quiet teen, a kid with psychological problems, a teen obsessed with mass shootings, especially the one done by Breivik.

It's only waiting for the verdict that he was autistic. The other kind of dangerous people.

A Muslim man screaming "Allahu akbar" before killing innocents and the German media being unable to imply a radical Muslim extremist narrative, instead chose to infer a relationship with Breivik, the far right wing terrorist. I can understand why the Liberal Media in the Liberal Germany would do that. Doesn't mean I will not see that there was possibly a little bit of both.

What I read in Dutch and German news is that this shooting was not IS related. "Amokläufer".

If I were IS, I'd claim anything I could get away with. Anything to spread the fear. That's what they want, and they are pretty good at it, so far.

That there are IS related attacks is beyond doubt. That that needs attention too. That there are other shootings and attacks is also clear. Blaming all on IS would make the world delightfully clear, with good and bad, god and devil. The world is not that clear. The lone shooters/car drivers/ etc will be part of our world and will go undetected till they do their deeds.

(With the car I am not referring to the truck in Nice, but to Apeldoorn, 2009)

I do not think people ARE blaming ALL on IS. So not sure how this holds water with what you are saying?

Germany first thought this was a terrorist attack, then they concluded it was not. Yet you say it probably is, but that Liberal Media does not want to have it so. That is what I reacted on. Germany has a history with terrorism. Germans are not fainthearted when it comes to naming something by the name it deserves. The RAF knew how to kill. They were part of the news a lot, when I was a youngster.

Further, if I were part of IS, I would make sure lots of nasty incidents were claimed by IS. Anything to spread the fear. If I were a member of IS, I would be delighted that people thought this loner was a soldier for the bloody cause.

You can't be "reacting" on my comment because I have never said ALL terror attacks are. So it would make no sense at all to even infer it.

You did not say all. Correct.

You do imply that the Germans, especially the media, may be deliberately missing out on terrorist motivation of the shooter in München. I do not get why the Germans would do that. I see not a single reason why they do.

This happened to be a shooter like they've had before, a kid running amok. Not that different from the plane that crashed a while ago. A man going down with a plane full of people, for no other reason than his own bizarre psyche.


I cannot understand why media would benefit from taking a terrorist reason away from it, if it was there. There is no logical reason to do so.

[benjimanbreeg]

Because of their cheerleading to pour millions of Arab and African Muslims into Europe? 

[benjimanbreeg]

Still, this will probably be another lowlife druggie/drunkard with serious mental issues.  Like in France today.  And one of the killers today I heard tried to get into Syria to fight for ISIS, but he was caught and taken back to France and then released    If he'd actually made it to Syria he would have probably been blown up, possibly by a French soldier