Author Topic: Sept 11 - 10 years on. An interesting question....  (Read 1376 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

The_Chosen_One

  • Guest
Sept 11 - 10 years on. An interesting question....
« on: August 23, 2011, 03:12:11 AM »
Here's something I was thinking about as Sept 11 approaches - why wasn't something done to ground those aircraft before they got to their targets?

We know that thousands of lives were lost when the 4 planes crashed (the 2 into the towers, the one into the Pentagon and the one near near Pittsburgh, and we know that the terrorist organization claimed the terrorists had flight training, but surely it would have been simpler for the pilots to say 'fuck you, the plane is on autopilot. If you want the fucking thing, kill me. But then you'll have to fly the motherfucker yourselves. And for starters, this is a 767, not a fucking Cessna or Fokker-fucking-Friendship.'

And surely ATC could have jammed the transponder and the radar to make it impossible for the planes to get where the terrorists wanted them to be taken.

Also, the amount of lives that would have been lost had the planes been ditched (which could have been an option) would have been a fraction of those that did die when the planes eventually crashed.

Maybe I'm trying to over-simplify things, but I'm just wondering if anyone else had thought of this scenario before.

Makes you ponder.

Offline Calavera

  • The Intellectually Deficient of the Aspie Elite
  • Elder
  • Dedicated Postwhore
  • *****
  • Posts: 3735
  • Karma: 358
  • Gender: Male
Re: Sept 11 - 10 years on. An interesting question....
« Reply #1 on: August 23, 2011, 05:29:46 AM »
It only tells me that the USA isn't as secure of a country as people make it out to be. It may be the most powerful nation in the world, but it is still full of stupid and fucked up leaders.

There were security experts who, beforehand, were warning about the Twin Towers not being secure enough to withhold plane clashes. Nobody paid attention until after it was too late.

Offline Parts

  • The Mad
  • Caretaker Admin
  • Almighty Postwhore
  • *****
  • Posts: 37381
  • Karma: 3053
  • Gender: Female
  • Who are you?
Re: Sept 11 - 10 years on. An interesting question....
« Reply #2 on: August 23, 2011, 06:56:46 AM »
No one did anything because in general nobody had a clue as to what was going on.  Also I don't believe anything like jamming the radar or transponder existed outside military control.  Sure things could have been done and people warned of these types of attacks in some circles but they seemed somewhat  remote in the possibility of them occurring at least that was the general train of thought.  So responses where not in place for such attacks as yet and confusion ensued.

As for the towers how many building are built to withstand that now let along in the early 1970s as for retrofitting them it would have taken years if it could have even been done effectively.  I am not sure how long ago they first started worrying about this but I am sure it wasn't time enough to fix them.

The USA a secure nation?  Maybe from attacks from other governments but not from people living here.  The only way for a government to be secure from it's own citizens and residents is a police state.

All that said I am so fucking sick of 911 you people don't even know how it it living in the New York metro area. You think you hear about it a lot?  Here it's in the news everyday in some way shape or form.
"Eat it up.  Wear it out.  Make it do or do without." 

'People who say it cannot be done should not interrupt those who are doing it.'
George Bernard Shaw

midlifeaspie

  • Guest
Re: Sept 11 - 10 years on. An interesting question....
« Reply #3 on: August 23, 2011, 08:21:35 AM »
Here's something I was thinking about as Sept 11 approaches - why wasn't something done to ground those aircraft before they got to their targets?

Such as?  A plane went out of radio contact for 3 hours last year when the pilots either fell asleep, got into an argument about their schedules or got busy looking at "something" on their laptops.  The plan had over 200 passengers on board.  Should the US government have shot it down?

Quote
We know that thousands of lives were lost when the 4 planes crashed (the 2 into the towers, the one into the Pentagon and the one near near Pittsburgh, and we know that the terrorist organization claimed the terrorists had flight training, but surely it would have been simpler for the pilots to say 'fuck you, the plane is on autopilot. If you want the fucking thing, kill me. But then you'll have to fly the motherfucker yourselves. And for starters, this is a 767, not a fucking Cessna or Fokker-fucking-Friendship.'

The pilots were dead.  Had their throats cut with box cutters.  This is why the restrictions are so tight and the flight deck door is reinforced and locked during all flights.  Also, the flight training they took wasn't on a Cessna, but was on the model of plane that was hijacked.

Quote
And surely ATC could have jammed the transponder and the radar to make it impossible for the planes to get where the terrorists wanted them to be taken.

I don't think that technology exists.  They were flying using landmarks, not radar. 

Quote
Also, the amount of lives that would have been lost had the planes been ditched (which could have been an option) would have been a fraction of those that did die when the planes eventually crashed.

As happened in PA.  Again, the pilots were dead so who was going to ditch the planes?  If a plane is hijacked and the hijackers say to stay seated or you will die (and there are dead bodies lying around to show they mean it) how many people are going to get up and fight to commit suicide by grounding the plane?  Only on the plane that went down in PA did the passengers know what was really going on after reading about it on their cellphones.  And when they learned that they were going to die anyway they sacrificed their lives for those on the ground.  The other planes probably didn't know the full extent of what was going on.

Quote
Maybe I'm trying to over-simplify things, but I'm just wondering if anyone else had thought of this scenario before.

Makes you ponder.

Pondering is good :)

midlifeaspie

  • Guest
Re: Sept 11 - 10 years on. An interesting question....
« Reply #4 on: August 23, 2011, 08:25:06 AM »
It only tells me that the USA isn't as secure of a country as people make it out to be. It may be the most powerful nation in the world, but it is still full of stupid and fucked up leaders.

There were security experts who, beforehand, were warning about the Twin Towers not being secure enough to withhold plane clashes. Nobody paid attention until after it was too late.

I don't think it is even possible to build a building that can withstand a crash from a jumbo jet.  Have you seen this behemoth?


The_Chosen_One

  • Guest
Re: Sept 11 - 10 years on. An interesting question....
« Reply #5 on: August 23, 2011, 08:42:02 AM »
MLA: points taken.

Don't the cockpit doors on those things open from the inside? I mean, how would the hijackers have entered the cockpit if the door was locked from the pilots' side?

Imagine, the hijacker shooting the lock to enter, the pilot(s) you would think could have been alerted by the noise, and set the ALS to ditch the flights.

Just hypothesizing. Maybe there was nothing that could be done. I'd like to think there could have been.

midlifeaspie

  • Guest
Re: Sept 11 - 10 years on. An interesting question....
« Reply #6 on: August 23, 2011, 08:45:19 AM »
MLA: points taken.

Don't the cockpit doors on those things open from the inside? I mean, how would the hijackers have entered the cockpit if the door was locked from the pilots' side?

Imagine, the hijacker shooting the lock to enter, the pilot(s) you would think could have been alerted by the noise, and set the ALS to ditch the flights.

Just hypothesizing. Maybe there was nothing that could be done. I'd like to think there could have been.

Before 9/11 they didn't even lock the doors.  My understanding is also that they were pretty flimsy and could be kicked open.  When strapped into a chair facing forward it is probably hard to defend yourself from someone coming in to cut your throat from behind :(

P7PSP

  • Guest
Re: Sept 11 - 10 years on. An interesting question....
« Reply #7 on: August 23, 2011, 09:14:05 AM »
The pattern of American Airlines Flight 11 was pretty consistent with all of them .
Departed Logan @ 7:59 am.
Hijack begins @ 8:14 am.
Transponder stopped transmitting @ 8:21 am.
8:23 am Atta inadvertently sends message to Boston Air Traffic Controllers when he thinks he is only talking to p[assengers.
8:37 am Boston ARTCC directly contacts NORAD who in turn contact Otis AFB.
8:46 am Flight 11 crashes into North Tower WTC
8:53 am F15s take off from Otis AFB.
There was no lead time.

The_Chosen_One

  • Guest
Re: Sept 11 - 10 years on. An interesting question....
« Reply #8 on: August 23, 2011, 04:41:57 PM »
Fair enough. So regardless of what information NORAD had gotten, it was practically too late from even take off.

Fucking scary.

midlifeaspie

  • Guest
Re: Sept 11 - 10 years on. An interesting question....
« Reply #9 on: August 23, 2011, 04:51:32 PM »
Fair enough. So regardless of what information NORAD had gotten, it was practically too late from even take off.

Fucking scary.

The world is not as safe as the purveyors of material possessions would have you think.

The_Chosen_One

  • Guest
Re: Sept 11 - 10 years on. An interesting question....
« Reply #10 on: August 23, 2011, 04:53:44 PM »
Fair enough. So regardless of what information NORAD had gotten, it was practically too late from even take off.

Fucking scary.

The world is not as safe as the purveyors of material possessions would have you think.

As well as those who believe that the earth is only 6000 yo.

midlifeaspie

  • Guest
Re: Sept 11 - 10 years on. An interesting question....
« Reply #11 on: August 23, 2011, 04:55:19 PM »
Fair enough. So regardless of what information NORAD had gotten, it was practically too late from even take off.

Fucking scary.

The world is not as safe as the purveyors of material possessions would have you think.

As well as those who believe that the earth is only 6000 yo.

Well, they don't even want the world to be safe.  They want everyone to die in fire and agony so they can go hang out in a boring white world with no sin and no fun for all eternity.  Makes a lot of sense, doesn't it?

P7PSP

  • Guest
Re: Sept 11 - 10 years on. An interesting question....
« Reply #12 on: August 23, 2011, 05:18:12 PM »
I have often been puzzled about the Christians who love their god but look at the earth as sin infested crap. I have asked a couple of them why they don't off themselves to be with their god and out of this alleged cesspool. Of course there is always some rationale for god to want them to stay here and vex others. I look at seals :seal: and trees and think of how much I like certain places.

Offline Calavera

  • The Intellectually Deficient of the Aspie Elite
  • Elder
  • Dedicated Postwhore
  • *****
  • Posts: 3735
  • Karma: 358
  • Gender: Male
Re: Sept 11 - 10 years on. An interesting question....
« Reply #13 on: August 23, 2011, 05:33:00 PM »
I have often been puzzled about the Christians who love their god but look at the earth as sin infested crap. I have asked a couple of them why they don't off themselves to be with their god and out of this alleged cesspool. Of course there is always some rationale for god to want them to stay here and vex others. I look at seals :seal: and trees and think of how much I like certain places.

God keeps them alive so that you may still have a chance at being saved. No kidding.

P7PSP

  • Guest
Re: Sept 11 - 10 years on. An interesting question....
« Reply #14 on: August 23, 2011, 05:36:22 PM »
And then there are the ones that consider suicide to be an automatic ticket to hell. That is not what Jesus called the only unforgivable sin.