Twunt: Because sometimes twat and cunt just aren't enough.
0 Members and 2 Guests are viewing this topic.
And what does "going macrobiotic" mean? nvm, Google helped me I see the benefits for both (I seriously doubt the "human cells" of the GM foods story). Macrobiotic foods (ie: locally grown grains, vegetables, etc) have been genetically modified over thousands of years of human farming technique. Utilising selective breeding; a slower version of genetic modification, farmers have been striving to produce hardier, more resistant and bountiful crops for years. Scientific technology has gotten to a point where we can do this much quicker than selective breeding. So to answer your question. I'd choose both for they are one and the same
Quote from: Cinnamon Bunny on October 15, 2007, 02:10:20 AM for the most best question ever!the answer: uhh... that's a tough one. i've been dreaming about my old pets and they feel so dear to me. eating human flesh is disgusting. i really don't know. i guess i would have to say pet flesh if it died of natural causes. ... but pets don't die of natural causes. There is absolutely nothing natural about an animal getting old enough to develop organic failures in the wild. If they do happen to get that old, they would naturally lose the next battle for survival they enter. Even the very act of keeping a pet is unnatural to the animals.
for the most best question ever!the answer: uhh... that's a tough one. i've been dreaming about my old pets and they feel so dear to me. eating human flesh is disgusting. i really don't know. i guess i would have to say pet flesh if it died of natural causes.
Quote from: Geelong Almighty on October 15, 2007, 02:28:25 AMAnd what does "going macrobiotic" mean? nvm, Google helped me I see the benefits for both (I seriously doubt the "human cells" of the GM foods story). Macrobiotic foods (ie: locally grown grains, vegetables, etc) have been genetically modified over thousands of years of human farming technique. Utilising selective breeding; a slower version of genetic modification, farmers have been striving to produce hardier, more resistant and bountiful crops for years. Scientific technology has gotten to a point where we can do this much quicker than selective breeding. So to answer your question. I'd choose both for they are one and the same no they are not. real genetic modding is injecting poison into the very cell or "embryo" of the plant and then watching it grow into a fullysized poison plant. this is evil.
death by gun or knife
