And here Les, just to refresh your memory is how you reacted to someone bringing your attention to the fact that you might want to think about a members situation before going on a tirade;
Picking on a pregnant woman? A new low even for your Les.
http://www.intensitysquared.com/index.php/topic,9579.495.html
Get up to speed Phlexor.
Explain "even for you" and then explain "picking on".
As for her pregnancy. I chose not her pregnancy nor her words. Nor did I choose her to use them here.
So have a read. Have a think and try again mate. I am sure you have good cause to say what you did and I would like to hear it.
You at this point can't even get the gist of a simple few sentences from Phlexor alerting you to picking on Kit without;
Explain "even for you" and then explain "picking on".
You were hell bent on a rant. Why should he have to explain SIMPLE ENGLISH?
It's no wonder he tried shock tactics about your failed marriage to snap you out of cuntsville....but no....you were too addicted to the debate and dehumanising things.
I was just trying to bring to Les's attention that he may not want to look like a doucebag. I guess I was wrong. Also, I guess we all found out that Les is the sensitive type.
Oh and apparently I think certain classes of members need protecting and that I want the almost non-existent rules of Intensity to be changed to reflect this. I'm glad people told me this and I wasn't even aware of how I felt.
Not at all. Had you wished to do this you would have bought your reasoning for thinking this to my attention via Pm or on forum without trying for a personal attack. You didn't even when asked to.
You chose this approach and you are reaping the benefits of doing so.
It just doesn't suit your argument, does it. If that were the case, where was my PM from you telling me that you thought it was poor form for me to address it public rather than private?
You do realise that this makes you a hypocrite, either it's okay or not. Falling back on "he started it" as a defence for doing the same as me really isn't good enough.
Not at all. You can say what ever you like. You can say I am wrong. Call me a cunt do whatever. At no point do I consider this anything but heated banter. Attack me personally and I will come straight back at you. You should know this and ought not be surprised when I do.
If before you decided to get personal, and it was your decision to do so, you wanted to suggest your rational for wanting to "protect Kit from a callout" over reasons do do with why she ought not be "subjected to this" that had more to do generally with her being pregnant or being a woman or being Kit, then you should have explained it like I asked or PM'ed me.
You did not. You were wanting to make a statement, or pull me into line, or be a cunt or whatever. You chose instead to throw caution to the wind and make a personal attack and at that point I felt justified to give you whatever I was wanting to. At this point (and only at this point) it really did not matter what you said.
You could have done differently and you chose not to so all good I will attack you personally as you have chose to react on me and I have no issue with that.
Doesn't at all make me a hypocrite. I asked you to explain yourself you chose not to. There are choices here and you chose your actions.
