What have you done today?

[Persona]

Bought a load of books on Amazon.

[Lucifer]

I voted no to that last one. You should stay in bed.

brilliant!  and completely unexpected. 

 

[odeon]

Oh, stop that clique-ish behaviour!

[Lucifer]

Oh, stop that clique-ish behaviour!

Yes.  O.  Meister.  I.  Hear.  And.  Obey.

[odeon]

Oh, stop that clique-ish behaviour!

Yes.  O.  Meister.  I.  Hear.  And.  Obey.

Yeah, following The Axis of Evil instead is *so* much better.

[Lucifer]

Oh, stop that clique-ish behaviour!

Yes.  O.  Meister.  I.  Hear.  And.  Obey.

Yeah, following The Axis of Evil instead is *so* much better.

Yes.  O.  Meister.  I.  Hear.  And.  Obey.

[odeon]

Oh, stop that clique-ish behaviour!

Yes.  O.  Meister.  I.  Hear.  And.  Obey.

Yeah, following The Axis of Evil instead is *so* much better.

Yes.  O.  Meister.  I.  Hear.  And.  Obey.

[Callaway]

[ozymandias]

Went out to a chinese restaurant for lunch with Amber.  It's a Sunday thing, today it's Father-daughter time, next Sunday it's mother-daughter time.

[ozymandias]

lost the will to live, after trying to trawl through reams and reams of same old, same old posts, in an attempt to get to ones by people who have something new to say. 

Maybe we should reopen the poll about the ignore button and debate it some more?

I think that Richard definitely had a point.

I probably would never use an ignore button even if we had one, but there may be people who would really like to ignore hundreds of posts that essentially say the same thing over and over and over again.

i'm not sure i agree with an ignore button on principle, but it's sooooooo tempting...

 

There was an ignore button on Fractalus and I used it on Ozymandias for a few minutes just to see how it worked.

You could see that he posted something, but his post was replaced with "Ozymandias is on your ignore list" and if you wanted to, you could click the button to unignore him just as easily as you could click the one to ignore him, since the button was on every post.

I did it to mishmish for awhile, when she was in peak filibustering/shit stirring mode.  Her posts were giving me the worst case of MEGO I had ever had.  Morthaur suggested that I make that public knowledge.  Which I did, announcing who and why I was ignoring her.  He feels, as do I, that ignoring somebody should be made public.  I unignored her after she stopped her constant complaints of disatisfaction with how things were being set up and constantly implying that everybody who disagreed with her was dishonest.   

[Sophgay]

played in the garden with my brothers

[Pyraxis]

I did it to mishmish for awhile, when she was in peak filibustering/shit stirring mode.  Her posts were giving me the worst case of MEGO I had ever had.  Morthaur suggested that I make that public knowledge.  Which I did, announcing who and why I was ignoring her.  He feels, as do I, that ignoring somebody should be made public.  I unignored her after she stopped her constant complaints of disatisfaction with how things were being set up and constantly implying that everybody who disagreed with her was dishonest.   

That's a cool idea. Is there some way to have an ignore button feature list in the profiles who's being ignored, or something similar?

[DirtDawg]

i can see why people would be against it, and it could make things very confusing at times, but then i also see it as being up to those who choose to ignore or not to ignore, whether they have that option or not. if someone wants to use it, i think they should be able to, although i wouldn't myself and would hope it wouldn't be used TOO much. i don't see it as censorship or anything, because it's down to each individual person, whether or not they want to use it. if anything, it's giving people more freedom IMO, which is what people seem to want. there are plenty of people already "ignoring" certain peoples posts, from what i've read. all this would do is make it more convenient for them

How could it be more confusing than hundreds of posts to sift through looking for one nugget.

[DirtDawg]

I did it to mishmish for awhile, when she was in peak filibustering/shit stirring mode.  Her posts were giving me the worst case of MEGO I had ever had.  Morthaur suggested that I make that public knowledge.  Which I did, announcing who and why I was ignoring her.  He feels, as do I, that ignoring somebody should be made public.  I unignored her after she stopped her constant complaints of disatisfaction with how things were being set up and constantly implying that everybody who disagreed with her was dishonest.   

That's a cool idea. Is there some way to have an ignore button feature list in the profiles who's being ignored, or something similar?

Do you mean you could open someone's profile and see a listing of all those who THEY have chosen to ignore?

That might be fun, but it would be better to have the notification in every single post of a person being ignored to remind them who all is ignoring them as they post.



I would consider that a useful purpose for the ignore button.

[Sophgay]

i can see why people would be against it, and it could make things very confusing at times, but then i also see it as being up to those who choose to ignore or not to ignore, whether they have that option or not. if someone wants to use it, i think they should be able to, although i wouldn't myself and would hope it wouldn't be used TOO much. i don't see it as censorship or anything, because it's down to each individual person, whether or not they want to use it. if anything, it's giving people more freedom IMO, which is what people seem to want. there are plenty of people already "ignoring" certain peoples posts, from what i've read. all this would do is make it more convenient for them

How could it be more confusing than hundreds of posts to sift through looking for one nugget.

not confusing for the person doing the ignoring
confusing for other people, if there's a discussion going on and certain people aren't seeing half of it etc