Neither is brave. Or Aryan. >:(
Sanskrit is brave. :zoinks:
Neither is brave. Or Aryan. >:(
iranians are aryan. oh, and as you're into etymology, the word "aryan" comes from sanskrit.
and the use of "either" when talking about three options is incorrect.
Sanskrit is brave. :zoinks:
not it's not: it's BRAVE!
:laugh:
Sanskrit is brave. :zoinks:
not it's not: it's BRAVE!
:laugh:
Don't you mean BRAVE? :laugh:
Neither is brave. Or Aryan. >:(What's your view on Aryan Jews. I met a couple the other night...
Jews are brave.
Braver than you, though it doesn't take much for that.
They defended themselves in Warsaw 1943, though it was hopeless from the beginning. You'd have said to the SS: "All you need is love".
livestock in Lit's village are brave.
Braver than you, though it doesn't take much for that.
They defended themselves in Warsaw 1943, though it was hopeless from the beginning. You'd have said to the SS: "All you need is love".
The appropriate Lennon song to sing would surely be, "Instant Karma."
:hahaha:
livestock in Lit's village are brave.
No, just abused. :LMAO:
livestock in Lit's village are brave.
livestock in Lit's village are brave.
No, just abused. :LMAO:
poor slaughter sheeps.
Wales is BRAVE! Too brave to belong to self-hating England. 8)
You're not brave enough. 8)
For killing towelheads or vote for the BNP, for example. 8)
For killing towelheads or vote for the BNP, for example. 8)
nah - i'd rather shag sheep. they look quite fetching in jackboots, too.
For killing towelheads or vote for the BNP, for example. 8)
nah - i'd rather shag sheep. they look quite fetching in jackboots, too.
Don't you already? 8)
Not even slaughter sheeps? "Liberals"? 8)
Do you mean liberal or "liberal"?
read it before. it doesn't get any less hilarious on the second read. :laugh:
Do you mean liberal or "liberal"?
define both.
Do you mean liberal or "liberal"?
define both.
"Liberal"=semi-communist claiming to be liberals, but only liberal when it comes to free immigration.
Liberal=libertarian or right wing anarchist.
Ha - possibly correct. They call themselves conservatives in my university. I have the distinction of being one of the few genuine socialists in my university.read it before. it doesn't get any less hilarious on the second read. :laugh:
Yes? Tell me, honestly: what's wrong with his analysis? Aren't most of the "leftists" whining, passive-aggressive quasi-intellectuals from the middle and upper class? I know foregneirs getting less upset when I say something racist right to their faces than these jerks you find at all universities nowadays.
For killing towelheads or vote for the BNP, for example. 8)
nah - i'd rather shag sheep. they look quite fetching in jackboots, too.
For killing towelheads or vote for the BNP, for example. 8)
nah - i'd rather shag sheep. they look quite fetching in jackboots, too.
Meh.
I prefer them in hawt silk with braids and bows.
The two are not necessarily mutually excluding.
The Swedish word would be "exkluderande" and the German "exkludierend", so it's merely your language that turns out to be illogical once again.
The Swedish word would be "exkluderande" and the German "exkludierend", so it's merely your language that turns out to be illogical once again.
The Swedish word would be "exkluderande" and the German "exkludierend", so it's merely your language that turns out to be illogical once again.
But if you wanted to preserve our fine language, you'd use "uteslutande" instead.
The Swedish word would be "exkluderande" and the German "exkludierend", so it's merely your language that turns out to be illogical once again.
why? it's partly a romance language, so why should it follow germanic language rules at all times?
anyway, i wasn't writing swedish or german, dur, and neither were you.
:hahaha:
The Swedish word would be "exkluderande" and the German "exkludierend", so it's merely your language that turns out to be illogical once again.
But if you wanted to preserve our fine language, you'd use "uteslutande" instead.
I do normally, and the Germans usually don't use "exkludierend" either, but I presented a point.
The Swedish word would be "exkluderande" and the German "exkludierend", so it's merely your language that turns out to be illogical once again.
why? it's partly a romance language, so why should it follow germanic language rules at all times?
anyway, i wasn't writing swedish or german, dur, and neither were you.
:hahaha:
The bulk of English is Germanic, even if you have polluted it with French, Spanish and other shit. Even your prepositions are used in a weird way.
The Swedish word would be "exkluderande" and the German "exkludierend", so it's merely your language that turns out to be illogical once again.
why? it's partly a romance language, so why should it follow germanic language rules at all times?
anyway, i wasn't writing swedish or german, dur, and neither were you.
:hahaha:
The bulk of English is Germanic, even if you have polluted it with French, Spanish and other shit. Even your prepositions are used in a weird way.
you keep saying "you" and "your" - aren't you rather making assumptions that i'm english?
He was wrong in his usage of exclusive, big deal. You know what he meant. Nitpicking when someone isn't even typing in their first language is kind of lame.
He was wrong in his usage of exclusive, big deal. You know what he meant. Nitpicking when someone isn't even typing in their first language is kind of lame.
I usually do. Shima is an American with college education. She claimed that my English was better than the English of about 90% of the Americans she knew.
When did she claim that?
How is she doing, anyway?
I usually do. Shima is an American with college education. She claimed that my English was better than the English of about 90% of the Americans she knew.
americans speak american, not english.
I usually do. Shima is an American with college education. She claimed that my English was better than the English of about 90% of the Americans she knew.
americans speak american, not english.
Oh, and Finns speak Finnish, not Swedish, even the Swedish-speaking Finns. ::)
Take away that hypocritical "free speech" lie from the board, then. You blabberized Cal and reported Illusions to his ISP and you ridicule/d Scrapheap and me for telling uncomfortable truths that didn't fit into your "liberal" view on things.
Take away that hypocritical "free speech" lie from the board, then. You blabberized Cal and reported Illusions to his ISP and you ridicule/d Scrapheap and me for telling uncomfortable truths that didn't fit into your "liberal" view on things.
Take away that hypocritical "free speech" lie from the board, then. You blabberized Cal and reported Illusions to his ISP and you ridicule/d Scrapheap and me for telling uncomfortable truths that didn't fit into your "liberal" view on things.
Poor you. Do you need a manly hug?
no-one's stopped you spouting your wibblings, lit. and i hope no-one will - you're far too entertaining.
:tinfoil:
We stand for freedom of expression, combative debate, and the generation of ideas. There are no boundaries here over what may be said, save for one rule - be prepared to back up your words. Or face the wrath of the community.
Oh, so Illusions faced the wrath of I2 when you reported him to his ISP?
Oh, so Illusions faced the wrath of I2 when you reported him to his ISP?
No. Why?
Oh, so Illusions faced the wrath of I2 when you reported him to his ISP?
Oh, so Illusions faced the wrath of I2 when you reported him to his ISP?
No. Why?
Why do you say that I'm easy to ridicule? You behave like a twat reporting a man to his ISP for posting things on a site you claim to be a free speech site.
Oh, so Illusions faced the wrath of I2 when you reported him to his ISP?
I don't think the community paid him much mind, to be honest. He was so obviously ignorant that his little posts called for no responding upheaval of concern.
The hosting service would have become concerned, in due time, had it not been for the pro-activity by our lowly, little respected and subservient webmaster/meister.
Get your tail wiggling ducks in a row, before you waddle forth with this kind of weak shit.
Oh, so Illusions faced the wrath of I2 when you reported him to his ISP?
No. Why?
Why do you say that I'm easy to ridicule? You behave like a twat reporting a man to his ISP for posting things on a site you claim to be a free speech site.
Because you are easy. With every new post you provide me with more ammunition. Believe me, I'm holding back.
Oh, so Illusions faced the wrath of I2 when you reported him to his ISP?
I don't think the community paid him much mind, to be honest. He was so obviously ignorant that his little posts called for no responding upheaval of concern.
The hosting service would have become concerned, in due time, had it not been for the pro-activity by our lowly, little respected and subservient webmaster/meister.
Get your tail wiggling ducks in a row, before you waddle forth with this kind of weak shit.
I have been an admin on a Swedish board, which is down now, and we would never have reported anyone to their ISP. Odeon just used it as an excuse for getting rid of Illusions.
Oh, so Illusions faced the wrath of I2 when you reported him to his ISP?
I don't think the community paid him much mind, to be honest. He was so obviously ignorant that his little posts called for no responding upheaval of concern.
The hosting service would have become concerned, in due time, had it not been for the pro-activity by our lowly, little respected and subservient webmaster/meister.
Get your tail wiggling ducks in a row, before you waddle forth with this kind of weak shit.
I have been an admin on a Swedish board, which is down now, and we would never have reported anyone to their ISP. Odeon just used it as an excuse for getting rid of Illusions.
OK, I'm not sure how you think that doing what-ever-the-fuck-you-want and bringing down a message board is helpful to your argument, but I'll keep listening.
If you think that those who are opposed to people like Illusionist are happy to see them go, you are wrong. It always increases the gravity of intellectual points to have them opposed by ignorant fools who show their true colors upon inspection. It is also an entertainment source, until they cross the lines of definable ethics and involve "us" in the areas of legal culpability.
Do some work. Understand this. Maybe the next board you are working will not be shut down as quickly.
Oh, so Illusions faced the wrath of I2 when you reported him to his ISP?
No. Why?
Why do you say that I'm easy to ridicule? You behave like a twat reporting a man to his ISP for posting things on a site you claim to be a free speech site.
Because you are easy. With every new post you provide me with more ammunition. Believe me, I'm holding back.
You're dishonest. You don't even admit that you reported Illusions because you hated his opinions.
Still no valid arguments.
The world of today is actually very similar to that of "1984" except that capitalism and not socialism is the New World Order ideology, at least the name of it is "capitalism". Most people in the West don't feel bad physically but psychically. The powerful states/superstate unions don't fight each other but fight by proxy, on a 3rd part's ground. The enemy is not Goldstein but Osama. Etc.
The world of today is actually very similar to that of "1984" except that capitalism and not socialism is the New World Order ideology, at least the name of it is "capitalism". Most people in the West don't feel bad physically but psychically. The powerful states/superstate unions don't fight each other but fight by proxy, on a 3rd part's ground. The enemy is not Goldstein but Osama. Etc.
Wait, you said before that the name of the enemy is Obama.
The world of today is actually very similar to that of "1984" except that capitalism and not socialism is the New World Order ideology, at least the name of it is "capitalism". Most people in the West don't feel bad physically but psychically. The powerful states/superstate unions don't fight each other but fight by proxy, on a 3rd part's ground. The enemy is not Goldstein but Osama. Etc.
Wait, you said before that the name of the enemy is Obama.
Yes, but Obama is the US Big Brother. Osama (or Usama) is Goldstein. You must read "1984" to get the point.
A man who was a professor in mathematics and one of the 10-12 best in the entire United States already at age 25 wrote a 55 page manifesto, where he declared what's wrong with modern society and why it must be destroyed.
No "arguments" against him, except that he used violence to get attention, which is no argument, because it doesn't make his statements false.
It doesn't make his statements true, either. Surely an intelligent man would have something else going for him than just violence?
But, let's face it: he wasn't very good at blowing people up, either. That airplane bomb failed, miserably.
What a fucking loser.
The hosting service would have become concerned, in due time, had it not been for the pro-activity by our lowly, little respected and subservient webmaster/meister.
I thought better of you, Callaway. Shame on you.
Laws suppressing free speech shall always be broken.
And I repeat: WE ALLOWED QUESTIONING THE HOLOCAU$T ON A BOARD WITH A SWEDISH HOST!
What happened to that board, Litigious?
Does it still exist?
I think that it makes sense to do what is necessary to satisfy the TOS of our host (which are very lenient compared to the TOS of most other hosts) so Intensity continues to exist for everyone else (including you) rather than have our host shut us down because of the illegal activity of one person. I don't think that it would be possible to find a host that allows people to conduct illegal activity while using their services. I believe Peaguy searched for a host with very liberal TOS, but even his host's TOS prohibit hate speech and illegal activity.
"Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the Government for a redress of grievances."
First Amendment of the Constitution of the United States of America
There are certain well-defined and narrowly limited classes of speech, the prevention and punishment of which have never been thought to raise any constitutional problem. These include the lewd and obscene, the profane, the libelous, and the insulting or "fighting words" those which by their very utterance inflict injury or tend to incite an immediate breach of the peace. It has been well observed that such utterances are no essential part of any exposition of ideas, and are of such slight social value as a step to truth that any benefit that may be derived from them is clearly outweighed by the social interest in order and morality.
It's rainy and I've got a headache. Nevertheless, what I post is the truth.
It doesn't make his statements true, either. Surely an intelligent man would have something else going for him than just violence?
For example?
QuoteBut, let's face it: he wasn't very good at blowing people up, either. That airplane bomb failed, miserably.
What a fucking loser.
He made several bombs, and that airplane bomb was probably not meant to kill people, since he didn't want to kill people randomly but merely people who worked for the system. It probably was meant as a smoke bomb, just to frighten people.
That was a cue for you. IMO, he didn't. He was and is just another loser.
The authorities thought otherwise.
He's where he belongs now, and if there is any justice left, he will rot there. After a few refreshing incidents in the shower first, hopefully.
That was a cue for you. IMO, he didn't. He was and is just another loser.
Unllike a winner like you who can blabberize and report people to their ISP and indirectly vote for the FRA law.
Quote
The authorities thought otherwise.
How surprising.
QuoteHe's where he belongs now, and if there is any justice left, he will rot there. After a few refreshing incidents in the shower first, hopefully.
You're a draft dodger that never fired a gun or even made a firecracker in your whole life, never risked anything and never believed in anything really original. You shouldn't have the right to air your opinion on a man like him at all.
Last pic: Swedish whore culturally enriched by four lovely Somalis, whom the Swedish people shall be thankful to feed and nourish.
Good that she didn't have a gun. She might have hurt some of the enrichers.
I have never abused anyone's rights.
I have never raped. I have never abused anyone's rights.
I repeat: I have never abused anyone's rights.
Not a human right - which I assume Lit meant. Asides, I really don't subscribe to this rights culture - some of these rights ultimately fuck with people, a good example is freedom of choice with schooling.I have never abused anyone's rights.
you're abusing my right not to be bored to death.
"Political Pundits
...or philosophy or religion. We lean toward tearing down the social structure and rebuilding it anew, this time where people get a fair shake."
No, you don't, so why is that statement there?
Not a human right - which I assume Lit meant. Asides, I really don't subscribe to this rights culture - some of these rights ultimately fuck with people, a good example is freedom of choice with schooling.I have never abused anyone's rights.
you're abusing my right not to be bored to death.
I am a rationalist if anything - pure to the sole aims of government which imo should be to keep the people safe and happy. As long as they do a good job then I am happy to be almost devoid of liberty.Not a human right - which I assume Lit meant. Asides, I really don't subscribe to this rights culture - some of these rights ultimately fuck with people, a good example is freedom of choice with schooling.I have never abused anyone's rights.
you're abusing my right not to be bored to death.
You're at least honest. I always had more respect for sincere socialists than for "liberals". :)
Not a human right - which I assume Lit meant. Asides, I really don't subscribe to this rights culture - some of these rights ultimately fuck with people, a good example is freedom of choice with schooling.I have never abused anyone's rights.
you're abusing my right not to be bored to death.
... Asides, I really don't subscribe to this rights culture - some of these rights ultimately fuck with people ...
My rights as an American citizen do not fuck with anyone. You might try again to fuck with my rights, though, like your ancestors tried, but you will fail again and again.
Newsflash:
There are several of us who are willing to stand up against you.
But do you know who to use them against?
You won't escape the terror of "society" by mocking anyone on this board.
You do care.
The fact that you bother to answer proves you wrong. 8)
If you want to destroy the current system and people won't listen to you, you have to use violence.
What's wrong with being a racist? 8)
:agreed: Somalis aren't human beings. :grrr:
The biggest lie you live with in a life of racism is to think that it does you no harm. The racist is equally harmed by his racism.
Why do they go someplace cold I don't get it. I showed the ice outside for the first time on a pond. Why don't they opt for warmer areas?
The biggest lie you live with in a life of racism is to think that it does you no harm. The racist is equally harmed by his racism.
QFT.
:plus:
Why do they go someplace cold I don't get it. I showed the ice outside for the first time on a pond. Why don't they opt for warmer areas?
Because they get no welfare in countries warm like their own. Even the pretty meager welfare system of the US is a paradise for them compared with where they came from.
:agreed: Somalis aren't human beings. :grrr:
The biggest lie you live with in a life of racism is to think that it does you no harm. The racist is equally harmed by his racism.
QFT.
:plus:
The biggest lie you live with in a life of racism is to think that it does you no harm. The racist is equally harmed by his racism.
QFT.
:plus:
How is the racist equally harmed compared to the people they're prejudiced against?
Christian rubbish. I hate it. I only hate Islam more.
The biggest lie you live with in a life of racism is to think that it does you no harm. The racist is equally harmed by his racism.
How is the racist equally harmed compared to the people they're prejudiced against?
:violin:
Racism is weak, misanthropy is far better. Equal dislike of all! :zoinks:
Racism is weak, misanthropy is far better. Equal dislike of all! :zoinks:
The biggest lie you live with in a life of racism is to think that it does you no harm. The racist is equally harmed by his racism.How is the racist equally harmed compared to the people they're prejudiced against?
How is the racist equally harmed by his racism?
(Am I freer of straw men with that one?)