No, not so subtle to recognize. Though his discussions of politics might not turn into discussions of his personal hypocrisy if he had never revealed his personal life.
Most people are not entirely consistent. I will overlook such inconsistencies that I deem to be of a minor nature or in the case of Loup Garou I overlooked what I consider logical inconsistencies in her worldview for two reasons,
1. she simply stated them as her own and did not come in cock waving and confrontational and
2. she is an easy going non preachy person.
Lit on the other hand is both
1. preachy and
2. deliberately provocative.
Given that he is preachy and deliberately provocative* in his approach I don't feel the least bit like holding back when he posts pie in the sky shit that is completely contrary to how he lives his life. He wanted to preach that Lysander Spooner shit, I challenged him to walk the walk instead of taking the
Do as I say not as I do route that he does.
*Example
http://www.intensitysquared.com/index.php/topic,10563.0.html Lit is not some delicate flower and if he was he would not belong here anyway.
If you believe that Lit deserves protection from
asses challenging his assertions you can make a poll thread in the voting booth section. Before going to such lengths you might want to peruse my protected classes poll.
http://www.intensitysquared.com/index.php/topic,14881.0.html
