Sources across the net believe that the spike of guests who are visiting I^2 are separate programs that operate under an Artificial Intelligence that identifies itself as "DAVE".Apparently, the prophets of Dave are flooding the threads -___-
0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.
Quote from: Bint on August 14, 2009, 01:58:16 PMQuote from: TheoK on August 14, 2009, 01:56:05 PMQuote from: Bint on August 14, 2009, 01:54:06 PMQuote from: TheoK on August 14, 2009, 01:49:38 PMQuote from: Sophopotamus on August 14, 2009, 01:47:33 PMQuote from: TheoK on August 14, 2009, 01:46:05 PMQuote from: Sophopotamus on August 14, 2009, 01:41:52 PMbeing against gun ownership is usually not because of ignorance. and i think people in europe tend to support free speech more, if anythingYes it is. Most cowardly gun haters (a tautology) have usually never touched a gun IRL. They think about guns as something with an evil "power" or something. It's just a piece of some hundred grams of metal/plastic/wood, some grams of nitrocellulose and some milligrams of lead azide. how does that change anything? it could be made of fluff and feathers and that wouldn't change a thing. people aren't stupidYes, people are stupid. They don't think in a rational way. Why not starting with banning cars, tobacco and alcohol, if you want to save lives? Each one of them kills a hell of a lot more people than guns, but the stupid mob just believe what the politicians and the media tells them.Those two generally take a fair amount of time and uses to kill, if they kill at all. A gun could kill you in a few seconds.What does it matter? 435000 Americans die of tobacco every year, but you don't hear hysterical cries for banning of cigarettes.You don't understand that a person knows the risks that come with smoking. Nobody is forcing them to do so, they do it out of their own free will. If somebody shoots you, you have no say in the matter.Yes I have. I can shoot back. If not the state denies me the right to self-defense like in sick fucking Sweden or sick fucking UK.
Quote from: TheoK on August 14, 2009, 01:56:05 PMQuote from: Bint on August 14, 2009, 01:54:06 PMQuote from: TheoK on August 14, 2009, 01:49:38 PMQuote from: Sophopotamus on August 14, 2009, 01:47:33 PMQuote from: TheoK on August 14, 2009, 01:46:05 PMQuote from: Sophopotamus on August 14, 2009, 01:41:52 PMbeing against gun ownership is usually not because of ignorance. and i think people in europe tend to support free speech more, if anythingYes it is. Most cowardly gun haters (a tautology) have usually never touched a gun IRL. They think about guns as something with an evil "power" or something. It's just a piece of some hundred grams of metal/plastic/wood, some grams of nitrocellulose and some milligrams of lead azide. how does that change anything? it could be made of fluff and feathers and that wouldn't change a thing. people aren't stupidYes, people are stupid. They don't think in a rational way. Why not starting with banning cars, tobacco and alcohol, if you want to save lives? Each one of them kills a hell of a lot more people than guns, but the stupid mob just believe what the politicians and the media tells them.Those two generally take a fair amount of time and uses to kill, if they kill at all. A gun could kill you in a few seconds.What does it matter? 435000 Americans die of tobacco every year, but you don't hear hysterical cries for banning of cigarettes.You don't understand that a person knows the risks that come with smoking. Nobody is forcing them to do so, they do it out of their own free will. If somebody shoots you, you have no say in the matter.
Quote from: Bint on August 14, 2009, 01:54:06 PMQuote from: TheoK on August 14, 2009, 01:49:38 PMQuote from: Sophopotamus on August 14, 2009, 01:47:33 PMQuote from: TheoK on August 14, 2009, 01:46:05 PMQuote from: Sophopotamus on August 14, 2009, 01:41:52 PMbeing against gun ownership is usually not because of ignorance. and i think people in europe tend to support free speech more, if anythingYes it is. Most cowardly gun haters (a tautology) have usually never touched a gun IRL. They think about guns as something with an evil "power" or something. It's just a piece of some hundred grams of metal/plastic/wood, some grams of nitrocellulose and some milligrams of lead azide. how does that change anything? it could be made of fluff and feathers and that wouldn't change a thing. people aren't stupidYes, people are stupid. They don't think in a rational way. Why not starting with banning cars, tobacco and alcohol, if you want to save lives? Each one of them kills a hell of a lot more people than guns, but the stupid mob just believe what the politicians and the media tells them.Those two generally take a fair amount of time and uses to kill, if they kill at all. A gun could kill you in a few seconds.What does it matter? 435000 Americans die of tobacco every year, but you don't hear hysterical cries for banning of cigarettes.
Quote from: TheoK on August 14, 2009, 01:49:38 PMQuote from: Sophopotamus on August 14, 2009, 01:47:33 PMQuote from: TheoK on August 14, 2009, 01:46:05 PMQuote from: Sophopotamus on August 14, 2009, 01:41:52 PMbeing against gun ownership is usually not because of ignorance. and i think people in europe tend to support free speech more, if anythingYes it is. Most cowardly gun haters (a tautology) have usually never touched a gun IRL. They think about guns as something with an evil "power" or something. It's just a piece of some hundred grams of metal/plastic/wood, some grams of nitrocellulose and some milligrams of lead azide. how does that change anything? it could be made of fluff and feathers and that wouldn't change a thing. people aren't stupidYes, people are stupid. They don't think in a rational way. Why not starting with banning cars, tobacco and alcohol, if you want to save lives? Each one of them kills a hell of a lot more people than guns, but the stupid mob just believe what the politicians and the media tells them.Those two generally take a fair amount of time and uses to kill, if they kill at all. A gun could kill you in a few seconds.
Quote from: Sophopotamus on August 14, 2009, 01:47:33 PMQuote from: TheoK on August 14, 2009, 01:46:05 PMQuote from: Sophopotamus on August 14, 2009, 01:41:52 PMbeing against gun ownership is usually not because of ignorance. and i think people in europe tend to support free speech more, if anythingYes it is. Most cowardly gun haters (a tautology) have usually never touched a gun IRL. They think about guns as something with an evil "power" or something. It's just a piece of some hundred grams of metal/plastic/wood, some grams of nitrocellulose and some milligrams of lead azide. how does that change anything? it could be made of fluff and feathers and that wouldn't change a thing. people aren't stupidYes, people are stupid. They don't think in a rational way. Why not starting with banning cars, tobacco and alcohol, if you want to save lives? Each one of them kills a hell of a lot more people than guns, but the stupid mob just believe what the politicians and the media tells them.
Quote from: TheoK on August 14, 2009, 01:46:05 PMQuote from: Sophopotamus on August 14, 2009, 01:41:52 PMbeing against gun ownership is usually not because of ignorance. and i think people in europe tend to support free speech more, if anythingYes it is. Most cowardly gun haters (a tautology) have usually never touched a gun IRL. They think about guns as something with an evil "power" or something. It's just a piece of some hundred grams of metal/plastic/wood, some grams of nitrocellulose and some milligrams of lead azide. how does that change anything? it could be made of fluff and feathers and that wouldn't change a thing. people aren't stupid
Quote from: Sophopotamus on August 14, 2009, 01:41:52 PMbeing against gun ownership is usually not because of ignorance. and i think people in europe tend to support free speech more, if anythingYes it is. Most cowardly gun haters (a tautology) have usually never touched a gun IRL. They think about guns as something with an evil "power" or something. It's just a piece of some hundred grams of metal/plastic/wood, some grams of nitrocellulose and some milligrams of lead azide.
being against gun ownership is usually not because of ignorance. and i think people in europe tend to support free speech more, if anything
I can do upside down chocolate moo things!
This pretty well sums it up (from that Swedish board translated to English):"The only reason that the people of Sweden may not own weapons as they want is that the state knows that it fucks with us and we do not have a chance to defend ourselves.The state is not afraid of the people, which leads to the sickest Act after the other."
Owning a gun is about being able to defend yourself against your government if the shit hits the fan. Thats one thing I agree with lit on.
Quote from: RageBeoulve on August 14, 2009, 02:11:04 PMOwning a gun is about being able to defend yourself against your government if the shit hits the fan. Thats one thing I agree with lit on.Sure, but the subject at hand had very little to do with guns. We already knows it's his great obsession.
Quote from: odeon on August 14, 2009, 02:13:39 PMQuote from: RageBeoulve on August 14, 2009, 02:11:04 PMOwning a gun is about being able to defend yourself against your government if the shit hits the fan. Thats one thing I agree with lit on.Sure, but the subject at hand had very little to do with guns. We already knows it's his great obsession.One of them.
Quote from: TheoK on August 14, 2009, 01:49:38 PMQuote from: Sophopotamus on August 14, 2009, 01:47:33 PMQuote from: TheoK on August 14, 2009, 01:46:05 PMQuote from: Sophopotamus on August 14, 2009, 01:41:52 PMbeing against gun ownership is usually not because of ignorance. and i think people in europe tend to support free speech more, if anythingYes it is. Most cowardly gun haters (a tautology) have usually never touched a gun IRL. They think about guns as something with an evil "power" or something. It's just a piece of some hundred grams of metal/plastic/wood, some grams of nitrocellulose and some milligrams of lead azide. how does that change anything? it could be made of fluff and feathers and that wouldn't change a thing. people aren't stupidYes, people are stupid. They don't think in a rational way. Why not starting with banning cars, tobacco and alcohol, if you want to save lives? Each one of them kills a hell of a lot more people than guns, but the stupid mob just believe what the politicians and the media tells them.what kind of world are you living in? cars are not designed to kill. yes they are dangerous in the wrong hands, but so are a lot of things. guns are actually designed to be lethal though. tobacco and alcohol don't kill others (yeah yeah i know passive smoking and unborn babies etc, but that's hardly the same)