Pavlov. The name rings a bell.
0 Members and 3 Guests are viewing this topic.
Quote from: odeon on September 08, 2016, 03:02:50 PMHe contacted me and said as much. Let bygones be bygones or something to that effect. We had a friendly exchange of messages over some time. At the time he also said that he had no interest in returning to I2.Now, obviously you will again interpret it in your own way, without any facts whatsoever, but quite some time after the last exchange, he posted those three videos on Youtube.Let this rest now.I know that regardless of what he said, he chose to post an angry video with someone else in the video calling you a paedo. Now it does not need spindoctoring to know IF he was posting angry videos at you THEN he is not resolved as you took him to be. I do not much care how he communicated his resolution, the fact he posted the video was proof that things were not now OK with him. You were resolved and he was not. It is fallout from your actions. A knock on effect. Bad outcomes. Both of you were in the wrong. Bad deeds from the both of you leading to bad ends. Neither of you were innocent victims in this.
He contacted me and said as much. Let bygones be bygones or something to that effect. We had a friendly exchange of messages over some time. At the time he also said that he had no interest in returning to I2.Now, obviously you will again interpret it in your own way, without any facts whatsoever, but quite some time after the last exchange, he posted those three videos on Youtube.Let this rest now.
Sidenote on the Peaguy thing: IIRC, he had this thing about making offensive rants against members of I2, then posting the video on YouTube. He did one about me, once. He seemed to think we should all post offensive videos back to prove we're not a bunch of wussess.Now , you can choose between a whole range of more-or-less equally valid opinions about that behaviour. My opinion is around the "not surprised he got banned" mark, but analysing what members did or didn't do to provoke Peaguy? meh.
Quote from: DrunkardsWalk on September 11, 2016, 10:21:10 AMSidenote on the Peaguy thing: IIRC, he had this thing about making offensive rants against members of I2, then posting the video on YouTube. He did one about me, once. He seemed to think we should all post offensive videos back to prove we're not a bunch of wussess.Now , you can choose between a whole range of more-or-less equally valid opinions about that behaviour. My opinion is around the "not surprised he got banned" mark, but analysing what members did or didn't do to provoke Peaguy? meh.Don't let the current drama be a put-off.
Quote from: Butterflies on June 26, 2016, 01:17:20 PMQuote from: rock hound on June 26, 2016, 12:47:52 PMI was asked by Pea to post this: The views are not mine, however, this is in the interest of free speech. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=h2SifV5fSng&feature=youtu.beThis video seems to be all about me He's even calling me by my real name on a Youtube video It's sweet that he's "not criticized me for being lesbian," and "not really criticized me for being Scottish" Is he mentally ill?Is it possible that Pea is FourAceDeal? Sorry to FAD if that''s not the case.That is your insult default isn't it. No judging, but it is isn't it?If you disagree with a position or don't like the person, you call them mentally ill or crazy or the like.I suggest that it usually is more likely that people have different thoughts and perspectives than you and that neither make you right nor more sane for having different thoughts.By all means though, keep throwing that out there.
Quote from: rock hound on June 26, 2016, 12:47:52 PMI was asked by Pea to post this: The views are not mine, however, this is in the interest of free speech. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=h2SifV5fSng&feature=youtu.beThis video seems to be all about me He's even calling me by my real name on a Youtube video It's sweet that he's "not criticized me for being lesbian," and "not really criticized me for being Scottish" Is he mentally ill?Is it possible that Pea is FourAceDeal? Sorry to FAD if that''s not the case.
I was asked by Pea to post this: The views are not mine, however, this is in the interest of free speech. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=h2SifV5fSng&feature=youtu.be
I can do upside down chocolate moo things!
Why you keep bumping crap about people who aren't even here?
How the crap should I know?
Found out I had not looked at this thread for six month.
As for who the victim in this is, there is a rather large elephant in the room if we are to talk about victims. Two of them intimately involved with you. Neither are you.
Quote from: 'andersom' on January 22, 2017, 05:07:16 AMFound out I had not looked at this thread for six month. Quote from: Al Swearengen on September 06, 2016, 06:21:17 PMAs for who the victim in this is, there is a rather large elephant in the room if we are to talk about victims. Two of them intimately involved with you. Neither are you.I keep thinking about rather large elephants, since I read this thread. Can't keep my stupid head from wondering if the elephants in case would mind being referred to as "rather large". So, not commenting on the content at all. Just got that rather large elephant in my head. Getting elephants as a present more than once from one of my kids doesn't help. Life is getting packed with elephants.
