Im not going to provide screenies of our conversations because they happened through PMs and I respect the private part of that word too much to do this.
That's bullshit because the conversation happened between two people, and I am giving you permission. You aren't violating my privacy.
If someone has been acting in a way that breaks the rules/refuses to address the issue when a mod comfronts him about it/says that he doesnt mind being banned to another member this member has been given a fair chance of a hearing and has refused to speak, there are several ways of working around this one and someone else(dont have ban tools yet) thought that banning you was acceptable.
And yet you spout about that you like second chances, etc. I was banned after calling one member one name and refusing to apologize. That name btw was "paranoid". You banned an ex-mod because he called someone paranoid and didn't kowtow when confronted about it. Does this sound like a healthy environment to you? Or is it more possible that, as I suggested before, this person whose name you won't use (but we all know that Moog is the only one left active with the ban tool and he admitted that he tried again and again to ban me and it wouldn't take) is trying to consolidate his little fiefdom by eliminating all dissenting voices from former members with inside information about how the place used to be run?
Going to sleep now, hope that you can find another interesting member you can question.
So now you know how this place works and you have learned why weak people don't last here. This is advanced internet over here bucko. Don't show back up until you can run with the big dogs. Sleep tight
