Educational
« previous next »
Pages: 1 [2] 3   Go Down

Author Topic: ...so are we officially 'at war'?  (Read 1789 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline bodie

  • Reflective Katoptronaphiliac of the Aspie Elite
  • News Box Slave
  • Maniacal Postwhore
  • *****
  • Posts: 14394
  • Karma: 2113
  • Gender: Female
  • busy re arranging deck chairs on board the Titanic
Re: ...so are we officially 'at war'?
« Reply #15 on: March 19, 2011, 06:58:07 PM »
ge Daffyduck has declared war on us now anyway

he also said the rebels he been firing on are Al Quida trying to take over???
 :screwy:
Logged
blah blah blah

Offline ZEGH8578

  • Idealist Nihilist Socialist Primitivist Anarchist
  • Elder
  • Obsessive Postwhore
  • *****
  • Posts: 7548
  • Karma: 492
  • Gender: Male
  • NTWADUMELA
Re: ...so are we officially 'at war'?
« Reply #16 on: March 19, 2011, 06:59:51 PM »
ahah NOW i get the "duck" joke :D:D

Quote from: bodaccea on March 19, 2011, 06:58:07 PM
ge Daffyduck has declared war on us now anyway

he also said the rebels he been firing on are Al Quida trying to take over???
 :screwy:


i think hes spoiled on power and control. kinda like when spoiled idiots tell you some absolutely ridiculous lie, expecting you to believe it, cus they dont know any better :D
(like one guy, on my other regular forum, threatening a friend of mine there to destroy his computer with a "flash animation virus" :D:D:D:D)
« Last Edit: March 19, 2011, 07:01:27 PM by ZEGH8578 »
Logged

Offline bodie

  • Reflective Katoptronaphiliac of the Aspie Elite
  • News Box Slave
  • Maniacal Postwhore
  • *****
  • Posts: 14394
  • Karma: 2113
  • Gender: Female
  • busy re arranging deck chairs on board the Titanic
Re: ...so are we officially 'at war'?
« Reply #17 on: March 19, 2011, 07:04:35 PM »
 :zoinks: :zoinks:a flash animation virus

oooh scary
Logged
blah blah blah

Offline ZEGH8578

  • Idealist Nihilist Socialist Primitivist Anarchist
  • Elder
  • Obsessive Postwhore
  • *****
  • Posts: 7548
  • Karma: 492
  • Gender: Male
  • NTWADUMELA
Re: ...so are we officially 'at war'?
« Reply #18 on: March 19, 2011, 07:07:03 PM »
Quote from: bodaccea on March 19, 2011, 07:04:35 PM
:zoinks: :zoinks:a flash animation virus

oooh scary

the same guy tried to make me leave the forum by assuring me he knew "MS13", and then pm'ed me pics of himself posing w a gun, or a toy gun, _either way_
yes, that type :D
as if hes gonna text "MS13" "hey this guy on the internet wont stop dissing me :("
and grown man at that...

a had a similar friend once, its just incredible what kind of ridiculous bullshit they come up with - and they do not _understand_ that nobody takes them seriously :D
Logged

Scrapheap

  • Guest
Re: ...so are we officially 'at war'?
« Reply #19 on: March 20, 2011, 10:27:43 AM »
Quote from: bodaccea on March 19, 2011, 06:54:53 PM
Quote from: ZEGH8578 on March 19, 2011, 06:48:50 PM
Quote from: TheoK on March 19, 2011, 03:17:25 PM
He had too many chances already. I remember when the US bombed Libya already in 1986, after Libyan agents blew up a disco in Berlin killing lots of civilan Germans and some American soldiers. Too bad they missed him then.

wasnt libya/qadaffi also behind that bombed airplane over scotland was it?

Lockerbie -  yeah it was.  also, the man convicted of this was freed by a scottish court a while back on humanitarian grounds he was dying of cancer with only weeks to live - but AFAIK he still alive!

Yeah, he's alive and well. The whole think was just a political kickback of some kind.  >:(

I hope Quadaffi Duck dies a slow, gruesome, painful death.  :evillaugh:
Logged

TheoK

  • Guest
Re: ...so are we officially 'at war'?
« Reply #20 on: March 20, 2011, 10:39:47 AM »
If the people of Libya get their hands on him, they will give him some nice punishment like being fried alive over open fire or cut in tiny pieces.  :zoinks:
Logged

Offline odeon

  • Witchlet of the Aspie Elite
  • Webmaster
  • Postwhore Beyond Repair
  • *****
  • Posts: 108802
  • Karma: 4477
  • Gender: Male
  • Replacement Despot
Re: ...so are we officially 'at war'?
« Reply #21 on: March 20, 2011, 12:33:47 PM »
It's obvious that he won't stop unless stopped, so yes, I agree that there should be a stray missile with his name on.
Logged
"Only two things are infinite, the universe and human stupidity, and I'm not sure about the former."

- Albert Einstein

Offline skyblue1

  • Overlooked of the Aspie Elite
  • Elder
  • Obsessive Postwhore
  • *****
  • Posts: 8945
  • Karma: 737
  • Gender: Male
Re: ...so are we officially 'at war'?
« Reply #22 on: March 21, 2011, 05:06:06 PM »
horrible situation that will evolve into tribal warfare with or without qadaffi
Logged

P7PSP

  • Guest
Re: ...so are we officially 'at war'?
« Reply #23 on: March 21, 2011, 05:08:21 PM »
Quote from: skyblue1 on March 21, 2011, 05:06:06 PM
horrible situation that will evolve into tribal warfare with or without qadaffi
Maybe, but his death is long overdue.
Logged

Offline ZEGH8578

  • Idealist Nihilist Socialist Primitivist Anarchist
  • Elder
  • Obsessive Postwhore
  • *****
  • Posts: 7548
  • Karma: 492
  • Gender: Male
  • NTWADUMELA
Re: ...so are we officially 'at war'?
« Reply #24 on: March 21, 2011, 05:10:43 PM »
Quote from: skyblue1 on March 21, 2011, 05:06:06 PM
horrible situation that will evolve into tribal warfare with or without qadaffi

truth.
which is why im not gonna monkey-rally around this one, even if i initially support the idea of no-fly zone, and teaming up w the rebels.

people get very idealistic about it "FINALLY! FREEDOM FOR THE LIBYANS *TEAR*"
its gonna get complicated, as always. allready has even, w the arab league turning against the involvement
Logged

midlifeaspie

  • Guest
Re: ...so are we officially 'at war'?
« Reply #25 on: March 21, 2011, 07:54:05 PM »
Congress hasn't declared anything so technically at this point the answer is no.  Not that it makes a lick of difference.  Who aren't we at war with?

Drugs
Cancer
Poverty
Terrorism
Illiteracy
Obesity

We really only declare "wars" when we can't possibly win.  When we can it's a "police action" or a "peacekeeping mission".
Logged

Offline bodie

  • Reflective Katoptronaphiliac of the Aspie Elite
  • News Box Slave
  • Maniacal Postwhore
  • *****
  • Posts: 14394
  • Karma: 2113
  • Gender: Female
  • busy re arranging deck chairs on board the Titanic
Re: ...so are we officially 'at war'?
« Reply #26 on: March 21, 2011, 08:15:07 PM »
The more i look at the situation i am starting to think  'back off eng-er-land'  like the septic's have.  They keep saying ge Daffyduck is not a target...well if that's the case it looks more and more like another Iraq.   Saddam was left in charge first time and he went on killing his people for another ten years.  What is the point doing all this if you are gonna leave him 'in charge' again?? 

Then, you have to look at the rebels,  what are they going to do?  are they all united? do they want democracy...are we going to take out 'the nutter'  only to replace with a gang of 'rebel' nutters :-\

maybe should get the fuck outta dodge!
Logged
blah blah blah

Osensitive1

  • Guest
Re: ...so are we officially 'at war'?
« Reply #27 on: March 21, 2011, 08:31:37 PM »
Yes, have the same view. Can't fix their problems. It's all about oil anyway, not the people.
Logged

Offline Adam

  • Elder
  • Almighty Postwhore
  • *****
  • Posts: 24530
  • Karma: 1260
  • Gender: Male
Re: ...so are we officially 'at war'?
« Reply #28 on: March 21, 2011, 08:40:45 PM »
Quote from: bodaccea on March 21, 2011, 08:15:07 PM
The more i look at the situation i am starting to think  'back off eng-er-land'  like the septic's have.  They keep saying ge Daffyduck is not a target...well if that's the case it looks more and more like another Iraq.   Saddam was left in charge first time and he went on killing his people for another ten years.  What is the point doing all this if you are gonna leave him 'in charge' again?? 

Then, you have to look at the rebels,  what are they going to do?  are they all united? do they want democracy...are we going to take out 'the nutter'  only to replace with a gang of 'rebel' nutters :-\

maybe should get the fuck outta dodge!

Yer - nigh - TED!!!!! 
Logged

Offline odeon

  • Witchlet of the Aspie Elite
  • Webmaster
  • Postwhore Beyond Repair
  • *****
  • Posts: 108802
  • Karma: 4477
  • Gender: Male
  • Replacement Despot
Re: ...so are we officially 'at war'?
« Reply #29 on: March 22, 2011, 02:00:32 AM »
Quote from: bodaccea on March 21, 2011, 08:15:07 PM
The more i look at the situation i am starting to think  'back off eng-er-land'  like the septic's have.  They keep saying ge Daffyduck is not a target...well if that's the case it looks more and more like another Iraq.   Saddam was left in charge first time and he went on killing his people for another ten years.  What is the point doing all this if you are gonna leave him 'in charge' again?? 

Then, you have to look at the rebels,  what are they going to do?  are they all united? do they want democracy...are we going to take out 'the nutter'  only to replace with a gang of 'rebel' nutters :-\

maybe should get the fuck outta dodge!

I think the point of the whole exercise is to stop daffy from murdering civilians. I do agree that it is rather pointless to leave him there if seeking a long-term solution, but for now, that part is not being addressed.
Logged
"Only two things are infinite, the universe and human stupidity, and I'm not sure about the former."

- Albert Einstein
Pages: 1 [2] 3   Go Up
« previous next »