2

Author Topic: Wikileaks  (Read 267 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline ZEGH8578

  • Idealist Nihilist Socialist Primitivist Anarchist
  • Elder
  • Obsessive Postwhore
  • *****
  • Posts: 7548
  • Karma: 492
  • Gender: Male
  • NTWADUMELA
Wikileaks
« on: November 29, 2010, 03:12:44 PM »
dangerous my ass

notice how only western powers insist these leaks are dangerous, why, you may even go blind reading them!
shittier nations seem more excited to see what these leaks contain  ::)

the ones i read so far are mostly childish immature banter about what political leader washes the least, masturbates the most, what country to trick into attacking another country, shit like that.

this isnt dangerous
its EMBARASSING

and the "SECRET" labels on the documents are there because of the sheer unprofessionalism they present.
i wonder what charges theyll pin on wikileak founder next, now that "rape" looks too fucking pathetic. more rape? yes! mass rape! yes during satanic mass!

richard

  • Guest
Re: Wikileaks
« Reply #1 on: November 29, 2010, 04:53:19 PM »
this isnt dangerous
its EMBARASSING
Well said. Image is everything

Offline 'Butterflies'

  • Mastermind of the Aspie Elite
  • Elder
  • Obsessive Postwhore
  • *****
  • Posts: 7500
  • Karma: 625
  • Gender: Female
Re: Wikileaks
« Reply #2 on: November 29, 2010, 04:57:42 PM »
dangerous my ass

notice how only western powers insist these leaks are dangerous, why, you may even go blind reading them!
shittier nations seem more excited to see what these leaks contain  ::)

the ones i read so far are mostly childish immature banter about what political leader washes the least, masturbates the most, what country to trick into attacking another country, shit like that.

this isnt dangerous
its EMBARASSING

and the "SECRET" labels on the documents are there because of the sheer unprofessionalism they present.
i wonder what charges theyll pin on wikileak founder next, now that "rape" looks too fucking pathetic. more rape? yes! mass rape! yes during satanic mass!

Saudi Arabia might be a bit concerned about alegations that they secretly wanted America to bomb Iran.

Personally I'm happy to see it all come out.

Offline ZEGH8578

  • Idealist Nihilist Socialist Primitivist Anarchist
  • Elder
  • Obsessive Postwhore
  • *****
  • Posts: 7548
  • Karma: 492
  • Gender: Male
  • NTWADUMELA
Re: Wikileaks
« Reply #3 on: November 29, 2010, 05:10:12 PM »
dangerous my ass

notice how only western powers insist these leaks are dangerous, why, you may even go blind reading them!
shittier nations seem more excited to see what these leaks contain  ::)

the ones i read so far are mostly childish immature banter about what political leader washes the least, masturbates the most, what country to trick into attacking another country, shit like that.

this isnt dangerous
its EMBARASSING

and the "SECRET" labels on the documents are there because of the sheer unprofessionalism they present.
i wonder what charges theyll pin on wikileak founder next, now that "rape" looks too fucking pathetic. more rape? yes! mass rape! yes during satanic mass!

Saudi Arabia might be a bit concerned about alegations that they secretly wanted America to bomb Iran.

Personally I'm happy to see it all come out.

exactly
they get all their auntie-gossip exposed for everyone to see

Offline Parts

  • The Mad
  • Caretaker Admin
  • Almighty Postwhore
  • *****
  • Posts: 37404
  • Karma: 3057
  • Gender: Female
  • Who are you?
Re: Wikileaks
« Reply #4 on: November 29, 2010, 06:34:13 PM »
Embarrassing is what it is it would be nice to have some other country show how poorly it keeps its secret document secret instead of it always being the US
"Eat it up.  Wear it out.  Make it do or do without." 

'People who say it cannot be done should not interrupt those who are doing it.'
George Bernard Shaw

Offline ZEGH8578

  • Idealist Nihilist Socialist Primitivist Anarchist
  • Elder
  • Obsessive Postwhore
  • *****
  • Posts: 7548
  • Karma: 492
  • Gender: Male
  • NTWADUMELA
Re: Wikileaks
« Reply #5 on: November 30, 2010, 07:35:24 AM »
leakage favorite surprise:

China does not support North Korea enough to bother to stand up for them if shit should go down.
They have determined that they have the capacity to take in about half a million refugees, should shit go down, and:
they will allow South Korea to take control of the whole peninsula if that should be the final outcome.

NOW WE KNOW, i think thats awesome. see? china aint so bad :)

GalileoAce

  • Guest
Re: Wikileaks
« Reply #6 on: November 30, 2010, 09:25:39 AM »
WikiLeaks have made news interesting again.

Offline 'Butterflies'

  • Mastermind of the Aspie Elite
  • Elder
  • Obsessive Postwhore
  • *****
  • Posts: 7500
  • Karma: 625
  • Gender: Female
Re: Wikileaks
« Reply #7 on: November 30, 2010, 10:32:44 AM »
leakage favorite surprise:

China does not support North Korea enough to bother to stand up for them if shit should go down.
They have determined that they have the capacity to take in about half a million refugees, should shit go down, and:
they will allow South Korea to take control of the whole peninsula if that should be the final outcome.

NOW WE KNOW, i think thats awesome. see? china aint so bad :)

TBH I never thought China would go to war with America over North Korea. It was clearly bluster from China. Nobody in their right mind would go to war to preserve N.Korea

Offline ZEGH8578

  • Idealist Nihilist Socialist Primitivist Anarchist
  • Elder
  • Obsessive Postwhore
  • *****
  • Posts: 7548
  • Karma: 492
  • Gender: Male
  • NTWADUMELA
Re: Wikileaks
« Reply #8 on: November 30, 2010, 12:41:31 PM »
leakage favorite surprise:

China does not support North Korea enough to bother to stand up for them if shit should go down.
They have determined that they have the capacity to take in about half a million refugees, should shit go down, and:
they will allow South Korea to take control of the whole peninsula if that should be the final outcome.

NOW WE KNOW, i think thats awesome. see? china aint so bad :)

TBH I never thought China would go to war with America over North Korea. It was clearly bluster from China. Nobody in their right mind would go to war to preserve N.Korea

of course, its obvious, but not official.
it makes me so happy to see the obviousness - in writing :D