INTENSITY²

Arena for the Competitive => Main Event Callouts => Topic started by: Walkie on August 02, 2007, 11:19:17 AM

Title: Walkie calls out McFuck’s Paranoia Yeah!
Post by: Walkie on August 02, 2007, 11:19:17 AM
Quote
But, treating the denizens of Intensity like lab rats is worse in what way than treating each other  like punchbags? (undoubtedly , the most popular local sport) 

I think you're very out of touch about what Intensity is like now if that's what you think.

You could well be right about that. But, on the other hand, I still find I have to wade through page upon page  of puerile mudslinging in my efforts to follow some purportedly serious discussion. If some kind of radical change has occurred  around here, can you blame  for failing to detect it? (I’m on dial-up, for  Pete’s ’s sake. And I’ve actually read a great deal more than my post count suggests. ‘cause I’ve got this stupid fetish for reading the whole of the thread before I post, if it’s a half-way serious issue. And most of ‘em defeat me. Guess why.)


Don’t get me wrong. I once  pushed for an unmoderated sub forum on Aspergian Island , in spite of the obvious drawbacks (and we wound up with something that called itself an “unmoderated forum” but wasn’t really. Ho hum.)., so I ‘m surely  not about to say: “Ban the puerile mudslinging”. I might even join in, now and then. I just wish I could filter it out, sometimes. (Hmm. I should think that’s technically feasible, but then some poor sod would have to devote their whole life to indexing the stuff)

Anyway, the only change that’s leapt out at me is McJ’s new username. Gotta say it really suits him. He didn’t need the “Mc” part, IMO, he was instantly recognisable, just  from a glance at his avatar. Plus ca change, as they say.

Btw, on the "lab rat" issue, i think I ought to add that I see no reason to to suppose that's what Pyraxis is doing right now

what do you have against me?



I’m temped to repond with: Nothing at all, not even in my dreams. Dunno about yours. But heck, I think you were actually serious (wouldn’t be the first time)

So you’re taking my observation that your username suits you as some kind of insult, hmm?
Maybe you should change your username, if you’re so ill at at ease with whatever-you-think-it –implies . Sheesh. I surely would. 

I suppose you  want to know what I think it’s supposed to  imply? OK, here goes. I have several alternatives in mind:
A) McFuck is obsessed with sex
B) McFuck is a dickhead (if that’s saying something different)
C) McFuck is well-intentioned prat who couldn’t McFuck a fly, except by accident
D) McFuck is stupendously accident prone Flies beware!
E) All of the other above, though not necessarily with any conscious intention on McFuck’s part.

I think A is surely indisputable, but overall  I favour E

I might add that your current avatar comes unnervingly close to paedophilia for my tastes.  But maybe it’s my own sick imagination makes that girl look roundabout 10 years old

 What was on my mind when I posted? Nothing much, except that the world’s leading exponent of mindless mud slinging could surely cope with a little bit of friendly  ribbing. Oh! And I was a little bit friustrated at the way you (and others)  interpose these mud slinging matches between  me and the end of a possibly interesting thread, But, if you read my post carefully (I mean, if you read the bits that don’t actually mention you by name) you’ll see that I made no secret of that.

End of. I could come up with some serious gripes , if pressed, I suppose. But there’s nothing I’m itching to raise; nothing that really seems remotely relevant right now.  If your Paranoia has a different idea, I’m curious to hear what it is. I know we’ve (privately) disagreed on some issues, in the past; but in the end, I thought you concluded, as I did, that there’s no real point in continuing those discussions. ‘cause neither of us was ever likely to budge.. That still how I feel, and I’ll be breathing a great big weary sigh if it turns out that you really feel a burning need to resurrect some past disputes.

Yeah. Hmm. I really do believe that you’re well-intentioned (unlike certain others whom I’ve publically clashed with on other fora), but I find you one heckova a frustrating person to talk to, that’s a fact.

Hmm. So this isn’t much of a call-out really, is it? Not unless your Paranoia demands more satisfaction than I’ve given it here. It might just turn out to be another damp squib, where everyone goes “Huh? What’s the issue here?” including the protagonists (um, that means  you and me, in Plain Simple English). But at least it’s out of the Peanut Gallery.
Title: Re: Walkie calls out McFuck’s Paranoia Yeah!
Post by: McGiver on August 02, 2007, 11:28:55 AM
sorry.  i thought we got along.

perhaps my non interest in doiung more than the minimum requirement to help neuroman is where your problem lies..

seriously, i just don't know why you singled me out in that thread.  i hadn't even responded to any of your site wide accusations.  even though i thought they may have been shortsided and unfounded.
Title: Re: Walkie calls out McFuck’s Paranoia Yeah!
Post by: McGiver on August 02, 2007, 11:30:45 AM
i also forgot to mention that i couldn't be arsed reading all that....i skimmed.  but still, my mind was elsewhere.  i was thinking the entire time, "i wonder if she'd give me a lapdance."  :laugh:
Title: Re: Walkie calls out McFuck’s Paranoia Yeah!
Post by: Walkie on August 02, 2007, 12:31:12 PM
sorry.  i thought we got along.

me too. Chill out, huh?

Quote
perhaps my non interest in doiung more than the minimum requirement to help neuroman is where your problem lies..
hold on...
the above tirade was my long-wibnded way of saying that i don't actually have a ptroblem with you.  But maybe you couldn't be arsed to read it. Or it's too subtle. Or summat. My only half-way problem is that you keep on thinking that i have a problem.

Srtiill , I'm glad you mentioned neuronman. 'cause the neuroman debate was exactly what i had in mind when i said i thought that we'd agreed to disagree. I don't actually thnk that you should or could have done more to "help". I think you tried too hard, in a sense, and just leaving it alone was the best policy. I was frustrated becuse we had such different ideas about what the basic problem was, and neither could talk the other round, that's all.  But i don't want to go through all that again, especially not in public. But i noticed your speculatuion that the Vivi/Pyraxis call-out had something to do with neuroman, so. naturally  I wondered if he's playing on your mind, still.

Maybe you feel gulty, or anxious, or something. . If you do, and if you want to offload, i'm willing to make myself available. But let me say plainly: I don't bear any grudgeson that account ; and if anybody else bears a grudge, they haven't mentioned it to me. Has that gone in?

Quote
seriously, i just don't know why you singled me out in that thread.  i hadn't even responded to any of your site wide accusations.  even though i thought they may have been shortsided and unfounded.

I think "accusations" is rather too strong a word. Honestly, I singled you out 'cause you have a lot of presence on this board, quite enough to be dubbed the chief "mud slinger" I thought you'd probably take it as compliment.  *Sigh* wrong again, huh? I'm not taking exception to people fooling around.  I just get a bit pissed, sometimes,  when the interesting stuff gets buried.  "shortsighted" is right though, cause  far too often, I can't see past the latest smart-arse slanging match. even though i might spend a whole hour  optimistically loading page after page, thinking it might revert to the original topic any time now. That's why i got bored with Intensirty, before and probably will do again.I really like the idea of Intensity. I'm sure it can be and is much more than just a pllayground, but it's such hard work uncovering the evidence.

Title: Re: Walkie calls out McFuck’s Paranoia Yeah!
Post by: McGiver on August 02, 2007, 12:35:11 PM
dammit.  another essay.
and right before i have to go back to work.


i promise that i will read everything later.
Title: Re: Walkie calls out McFuck’s Paranoia Yeah!
Post by: Walkie on August 02, 2007, 12:37:30 PM
i also forgot to mention that i couldn't be arsed reading all that....i skimmed.  but still, my mind was elsewhere.  i was thinking the entire time, "i wonder if she'd give me a lapdance."  :laugh:
:clap: Ahh. That's more like the McFuck we all know and....erm...
The short answer is No, but if that means we're still on friendly terms, then ummm, thanks

(Heck did i just thank McFuck for one of his insanely sexist propositions ? Holy shit. Get me outta here))
Title: Re: Walkie calls out McFuck’s Paranoia Yeah!
Post by: McGiver on August 02, 2007, 06:05:44 PM
Quote
Maybe you feel gulty, or anxious, or something. . If you do, and if you want to offload, i'm willing to make myself available. But let me say plainly: I don't bear any grudgeson that account ; and if anybody else bears a grudge, they haven't mentioned it to me. Has that gone in?

nope.  no guilt.
Title: Re: Walkie calls out McFuck’s Paranoia Yeah!
Post by: McGiver on August 02, 2007, 06:07:31 PM
Quote
the above tirade was my long-wibnded way of saying that i don't actually have a ptroblem with you.  But maybe you couldn't be arsed to read it. Or it's too subtle. Or summat. My only half-way problem is that you keep on thinking that i have a problem.
actually i am flattered each time my name is tossed around out of the blue.  gives me a heightened sense of importance.   even bad publicity is good publicity and all that.
Title: Re: Walkie calls out McFuck’s Paranoia Yeah!
Post by: McGiver on August 02, 2007, 06:09:16 PM
Quote
Srtiill , I'm glad you mentioned neuronman. 'cause the neuroman debate was exactly what i had in mind when i said i thought that we'd agreed to disagree. I don't actually thnk that you should or could have done more to "help". I think you tried too hard, in a sense, and just leaving it alone was the best policy. I was frustrated becuse we had such different ideas about what the basic problem was, and neither could talk the other round, that's all.  But i don't want to go through all that again, especially not in public. But i noticed your speculatuion that the Vivi/Pyraxis call-out had something to do with neuroman, so. naturally  I wondered if he's playing on your mind, still.
not really playing on my mind.  i'd say, "no."
i was just curious as to why he finally added a link to intensity on the neurolands.  and the write up makes it seem like it was his idea....i know we came from the neurolands, and the neurolands came from me.
Title: Re: Walkie calls out McFuck’s Paranoia Yeah!
Post by: McGiver on August 02, 2007, 06:09:59 PM
i am glad to hear that we remain on friendly terms.

why won't you give me that lapdance?
Title: Re: Walkie calls out McFuck’s Paranoia Yeah!
Post by: Walkie on August 02, 2007, 06:34:51 PM
i am glad to hear that we remain on friendly terms.

why won't you give me that lapdance?

'Cause I want to be faithful to my own sweet ego , of course   :angel:
(besides, the silly bitch would get jealous  ::))

We can shake hands, though, provided you wash 'em first  :green:
Title: Re: Walkie calls out McFuck’s Paranoia Yeah!
Post by: McGiver on August 02, 2007, 06:51:57 PM
i am glad to hear that we remain on friendly terms.

why won't you give me that lapdance?

'Cause I want to be faithful to my own sweet ego , of course   :angel:
(besides, the silly bitch would get jealous  ::))

We can shake hands, though, provided you wash 'em first  :green:
i just took a shower.  how about a hug?
Title: Re: Walkie calls out McFuck’s Paranoia Yeah!
Post by: Walkie on August 02, 2007, 08:00:03 PM

Umm…hang on McJ. I gotta hug Callaway first (she just sent me my secret decoder ring AND gave me a shiny new custom title)

Aww, nah, that’s mean isn’t it? (where the heck did  that mental picture of puppy-dog eyes suddenly spring from?)  C’mon, then

:hug:

(Hmm now, do I have to take a shower,  before I hug Callaway?)
 
Title: Re: Walkie calls out McFuck’s Paranoia Yeah!
Post by: McGiver on August 02, 2007, 08:03:54 PM
no.  i just took a shower.

:grabs DW butt and squeezes: 8)
Title: Re: Walkie calls out McFuck’s Paranoia Yeah!
Post by: maldoror on August 02, 2007, 10:46:18 PM
I might add that your current avatar comes unnervingly close to paedophilia for my tastes.  But maybe it’s my own sick imagination makes that girl look roundabout 10 years old


That avatar is fucking hypotizing me.
Title: Re: Walkie calls out McFuck’s Paranoia Yeah!
Post by: McGiver on August 03, 2007, 06:24:00 AM

I might add that your current avatar comes unnervingly close to paedophilia for my tastes.  But maybe it’s my own sick imagination makes that girl look roundabout 10 years old

sayd the former president of the gary glitter fanclub.
Title: Re: Walkie calls out McFuck’s Paranoia Yeah!
Post by: SovaNu on August 17, 2007, 09:42:26 PM
i like the word hypotizing.
Title: Re: Walkie calls out McFuck’s Paranoia Yeah!
Post by: McGiver on August 17, 2007, 09:43:52 PM
hypothocizing?


nevermind, that is another word i butchered by sounding it out in my head.
Title: Re: Walkie calls out McFuck’s Paranoia Yeah!
Post by: SovaNu on August 17, 2007, 09:47:29 PM
hypothesis.
Title: Re: Walkie calls out McFuck’s Paranoia Yeah!
Post by: McGiver on August 17, 2007, 09:49:58 PM
hypothesis.
thanks mommy.
Title: Re: Walkie calls out McFuck’s Paranoia Yeah!
Post by: SovaNu on August 17, 2007, 09:56:09 PM
no prob sonnyboy.
Title: Re: Walkie calls out McFuck’s Paranoia Yeah!
Post by: Yuri Bezmenov on July 02, 2017, 06:43:49 PM
I had no idea that Walkie had been around this long.
Title: Re: Walkie calls out McFuck’s Paranoia Yeah!
Post by: Walkie on July 02, 2017, 07:36:45 PM
Scap,   I can't believe that you had to go and bloody well necro this particular thread, right now,

You know Pyraxis has just informed mcJ of Wolfie's death? You know McJ abnnd wolfie were close?  Co-admins of the the opriginal Intensity? (before I2)

Would it be possible for some Admin to push this one back down the list? If Mc j comes online to read the tributes erc. , i don't want it to look like I'm picking fights with him , all of a sudden, not under present circumstances.

Might be slightly amusinf, some other time
Title: Re: Walkie calls out McFuck’s Paranoia Yeah!
Post by: Pyraxis on July 02, 2017, 07:38:58 PM
I don't think he's coming online. He has his hands full with some IRL stuff. (Which I didn't have a chance to ask if it was okay to share here.)
Title: Re: Walkie calls out McFuck’s Paranoia Yeah!
Post by: Walkie on July 02, 2017, 08:11:20 PM
oh, ok :)
Title: Re: Walkie calls out McFuck’s Paranoia Yeah!
Post by: Yuri Bezmenov on July 09, 2017, 09:50:55 PM
Scap,   I can't believe that you had to go and bloody well necro this particular thread, right now,

You know Pyraxis has just informed mcJ of Wolfie's death? You know McJ abnnd wolfie were close?  Co-admins of the the opriginal Intensity? (before I2)

Would it be possible for some Admin to push this one back down the list? If Mc j comes online to read the tributes erc. , i don't want it to look like I'm picking fights with him , all of a sudden, not under present circumstances.

Might be slightly amusinf, some other time

What the hell are you going on about?

No one in their right mind would think what you're accusing me of.

And the fact that you would ask an admin to moderate this site to suit your feefees is just...   disturbing.
Title: Re: Walkie calls out McFuck’s Paranoia Yeah!
Post by: Walkie on July 11, 2017, 05:13:45 PM
Scrap, I was accusing you of necroing a thread  at a really inopportune moment , that's all.  No harm done, as it happens.

But heck, this was the very next thing I saw, right  after reading that Pyraxis had just informed Mc J of Wolfie's passing.  He and Wolfie were really close, at one time,  so, I thought it more than likeLy that McJ would come here  to pay his respects. That didn't happen, but that's what I was thinking

So when I saw this thread  pop up, the uppermost thought in my mind was "WTF will McJ make of Walkie calling him out at this moment in time"? When old threads pop up like that, people assume they'ee current , don't they? Even I thought it was current for a minute, though I couldn't think  who the heck would make it, or why

I don't know what a feefee is, but if you mean I asked them to moderate this thread to suit mny friends, well Mc J isn't even a friend of mine; I haven't talked with him in years and years, but I wouldn't want to kick anybody when they're down, especially not at a time llike that. it would be totally disrespectful, to saythe least, like taking pot-shots at a funeral cortege.

So maybe you did a dumb thing,necrroing that thread,  or maybe I was dumb to worry about it. Whatever.  I don't really care any more.

In any case, it wasn't even about you, really. It was about me not wanting to slap McJ in the face.
Title: Re: Walkie calls out McFuck’s Paranoia Yeah!
Post by: Gopher Gary on July 11, 2017, 08:00:08 PM
I think fee fees is supposed to be feelings.  :orly: Although Urban Dictionary says a fee fee is a male masturbatory device made with a towel and rubber glove, and used by prisoners.  :lol1:
Title: Re: Walkie calls out McFuck’s Paranoia Yeah!
Post by: Yuri Bezmenov on July 12, 2017, 01:12:36 PM
Scrap, I was accusing you of necroing a thread  at a really inopportune moment , that's all.

Ok, this is where you start to go wrong. There was nothing inopportune about when I bumped this. I saw it under "who's online now" as being viewed by a guest (google bot). I clicked on it and was surprised by the date. I had forgotten how long you had been a member here.

Quote
So when I saw this thread  pop up, the uppermost thought in my mind was "WTF will McJ make of Walkie calling him out at this moment in time"? When old threads pop up like that, people assume they'ee current , don't they?

No they don't. If McJagger saw this, all that he'd think is a piece of history that is water WAY under the bridge. Old threads get bumped here because current activity is dying down.

Quote
Even I thought it was current for a minute, though I couldn't think  who the heck would make it, or why

Lay off the crack pipe perhaps?? 

Quote
I don't know what a feefee is

Derogatory term for feelings.

Quote
So maybe you did a dumb thing,necrroing that thread,  or maybe I was dumb to worry about it. Whatever.  I don't really care any more.

You were dumb to worry about it.

Quote
In any case, it wasn't even about you, really. It was about me not wanting to slap McJ in the face.

You weren't, I wasn't. I was merely noting how old this incident was.
Title: Re: Walkie calls out McFuck’s Paranoia Yeah!
Post by: Arya Quinn on July 21, 2017, 08:51:07 PM
You weren't, I wasn't. I was merely noting how old this incident was.

Still a pretty shitty time to be doing so.
Title: Re: Walkie calls out McFuck’s Paranoia Yeah!
Post by: Yuri Bezmenov on July 27, 2017, 01:46:42 PM
You weren't, I wasn't. I was merely noting how old this incident was.

Still a pretty shitty time to be doing so.

I'm sure you have a fainting couch in your mothers basement.
Title: Re: Walkie calls out McFuck’s Paranoia Yeah!
Post by: Arya Quinn on July 28, 2017, 08:20:28 AM
You weren't, I wasn't. I was merely noting how old this incident was.

Still a pretty shitty time to be doing so.

I'm sure you have a fainting couch in your mothers basement.

I'm sure you have a dildo in the shape of an airplane.
Title: Re: Walkie calls out McFuck’s Paranoia Yeah!
Post by: 'andersom' on July 28, 2017, 10:25:47 AM
  :rofl:
Title: Re: Walkie calls out McFuck’s Paranoia Yeah!
Post by: odeon on July 28, 2017, 12:32:33 PM
With sharp wings. :P
Title: Re: Walkie calls out McFuck’s Paranoia Yeah!
Post by: Arya Quinn on July 28, 2017, 06:12:43 PM
With sharp wings. :P

Sharp enough so that it turns him on but not sharp enough to cause internal bleeding in his butt.   :eyelash:
Title: Re: Walkie calls out McFuck’s Paranoia Yeah!
Post by: Yuri Bezmenov on July 28, 2017, 06:19:42 PM
You weren't, I wasn't. I was merely noting how old this incident was.

Still a pretty shitty time to be doing so.

I'm sure you have a fainting couch in your mothers basement.

I'm sure you have a dildo in the shape of an airplane.

 :facepalm2:

An airplane isn't exactly phallus shaped, there shit-for-brains.

I noticed you didn't deny my accusations...

Now you're just engaging in gay fantasies, not that there's anything wrong with that.  :rofl:
Title: Re: Walkie calls out McFuck’s Paranoia Yeah!
Post by: Arya Quinn on July 28, 2017, 06:29:07 PM
You weren't, I wasn't. I was merely noting how old this incident was.

Still a pretty shitty time to be doing so.

I'm sure you have a fainting couch in your mothers basement.

I'm sure you have a dildo in the shape of an airplane.

 :facepalm2:

An airplane isn't exactly phallus shaped, there shit-for-brains.

I noticed you didn't deny my accusations...

Now you're just engaging in gay fantasies, not that there's anything wrong with that.  :rofl:

(http://img.youtube.com/vi/pZCVG7zUaRA/0.jpg)
 
I would post pics of other airplane-themed dildos but I don't think it's allowed in this section of the site.

I noticed you didn't deny my accusations :eyelash:

But in response to yours...I wouldn't have the room for a fainting couch in my room. And as it's Northern Ireland hardly any houses have actual basements.
Title: Re: Walkie calls out McFuck’s Paranoia Yeah!
Post by: Jack on July 28, 2017, 06:56:41 PM
I would post pics of other airplane-themed dildos but I don't think it's allowed in this section of the site.

Dildos are acceptable content in any area of the site.
Title: Re: Walkie calls out McFuck’s Paranoia Yeah!
Post by: Yuri Bezmenov on July 31, 2017, 08:39:40 AM
I noticed you didn't deny my accusations :eyelash:

But in response to yours...I wouldn't have the room for a fainting couch in my room. And as it's Northern Ireland hardly any houses have actual basements.

:fp:

You really are just as dumb as TA, you just cover it up with snark.
Title: Re: Walkie calls out McFuck’s Paranoia Yeah!
Post by: Arya Quinn on July 31, 2017, 09:17:34 PM
I noticed you didn't deny my accusations :eyelash:

But in response to yours...I wouldn't have the room for a fainting couch in my room. And as it's Northern Ireland hardly any houses have actual basements.

:fp:

You really are just as dumb as TA, you just cover it up with snark.

And you're just a sad, miserable old man with nothing better to do than to necrobump a call-out thread right after the death of someone on this site when someone in the call-out was a good friend of the recently deceased. You're pathetic.

And if I'm calling someone pathetic, they must be really goddamn pathetic.
Title: Re: Walkie calls out McFuck’s Paranoia Yeah!
Post by: Yuri Bezmenov on July 31, 2017, 09:36:35 PM
And you're just a sad, miserable old man with nothing better to do

You're projecting again.

Quote
than to necrobump a call-out thread right after the death of someone on this site when someone in the call-out was a good friend of the recently deceased. You're pathetic.

So fucking what? How is that even relevant? Neuroman was friends with lots of people here. Do you have a list of people who I am and am not allowed to necrobump? Who gets to determine this??

Quote
And if I'm calling someone pathetic, they must be really goddamn pathetic.

:LMAO: 

Yeah, because you're the sole arbiter of truth on teh intewebz.
Title: Re: Walkie calls out McFuck’s Paranoia Yeah!
Post by: Arya Quinn on July 31, 2017, 09:47:28 PM
And you're just a sad, miserable old man with nothing better to do

You're projecting again.

Yeah, because I'm old as shit and don't have an active life with actual friends...Oh wait.  :zombiefuck:

Quote
So fucking what? How is that even relevant? Neuroman was friends with lots of people here. Do you have a list of people who I am and am not allowed to necrobump? Who gets to determine this??

The timing was pretty fucking poor, but then again you don't seem to give a shit. In fact, you really don't give a shit about anyone but yourself. The necrobumping for the lolz is much more important to you.

Quote
:LMAO: 
Yeah, because you're the sole arbiter of truth on teh intewebz.

Because I know a pathetic piece of shit when I see one.
Title: Re: Walkie calls out McFuck’s Paranoia Yeah!
Post by: Yuri Bezmenov on July 31, 2017, 09:51:35 PM
You didn't actually answer my question but then again I wasn't expecting anything.   ::)
Title: Re: Walkie calls out McFuck’s Paranoia Yeah!
Post by: Arya Quinn on July 31, 2017, 10:04:58 PM
You didn't actually answer my question but then again I wasn't expecting anything.   ::)

I did answer you question, Pappy. I said that the timing was poor.
So the answer to your questions of do I have a list or who you can't necrobump (ect) the answer is show a little consideration. Jesus, it's not difficult to act like a decent human being. Even if it's every once in a while.

Not that you'll listen to a word I have to say anyway, you'll just reply with the same crap you always do.
Title: Re: Walkie calls out McFuck’s Paranoia Yeah!
Post by: Yuri Bezmenov on August 01, 2017, 09:48:32 AM
You didn't actually answer my question but then again I wasn't expecting anything.   ::)

I did answer you question, Pappy. I said that the timing was poor.

That is an arbitrary value judgement with no factual basis for it whatsoever.


Quote
So the answer to your questions of do I have a list or who you can't necrobump (ect) the answer is show a little consideration. Jesus, it's not difficult to act like a decent human being. Even if it's every once in a while.

This is dodging the question again, all you do is try to sling mud at me. What is the standard by which I'm allowed (in your opinion) to necrobump and by what timeframe?  You can't begin to answer those questions and you fucking know it.

Quote
Not that you'll listen to a word I have to say anyway, you'll just reply with the same crap you always do.

... and yet you're responding, with fail, as you always do.
Title: Re: Walkie calls out McFuck’s Paranoia Yeah!
Post by: Arya Quinn on August 02, 2017, 01:02:58 PM
You didn't actually answer my question but then again I wasn't expecting anything.   ::)

I did answer you question, Pappy. I said that the timing was poor.

That is an arbitrary value judgement with no factual basis for it whatsoever.

If you can't get it through your thick skull, then here it is: The timing of the necrobump was poor considering the recent death. Bringing up old drama when one of the said people involved in said drama was buddies with said deceased.

Get it now?

Quote
Quote
So the answer to your questions of do I have a list or who you can't necrobump (ect) the answer is show a little consideration. Jesus, it's not difficult to act like a decent human being. Even if it's every once in a while.

This is dodging the question again, all you do is try to sling mud at me. What is the standard by which I'm allowed (in your opinion) to necrobump and by what timeframe?

Okay, don't bring up old drama when people involved in said drama have just had a personal loss. If you're looking for a timeframe, I dunno maybe wait a couple of days? Weeks?
 
Quote
Quote
Not that you'll listen to a word I have to say anyway, you'll just reply with the same crap you always do.

... and yet you're responding, with fail, as you always do.

Well to be honest I am kinda stumped on that one. Aside from trying to get through to you so you'll act with a decent amount of consideration for others I honestly haven' a fucking clue as to why I'm replying to these posts.