INTENSITY²
Politics, Mature and taboo => Political Pundits => Topic started by: Yuri Bezmenov on July 10, 2016, 10:35:56 PM
-
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=kQv_6GXVbDw
-
Gary for President!
-
Gary would be an awesome president.
-
The Federal Election Commission has over 3,775 presidential candidates registered for the election. Can't we find some else besides these two?
-
I was trying to remember where I heard the name Bill Weld. Wasn't he suspected of being Chelsea Clinton's Biological Father?
-
The Federal Election Commission has over 3,775 presidential candidates registered for the election. Can't we find some else besides these two?
Sad, isn't it?
I'd nominate Morgan Freeman over these two yo-yo's...he'd probably win too.
-
Not a fan.
http://thelibertarianrepublic.com/johnson-doubles-down-wont-attack-hillary/
He should rail against both of them and drop TPP whilst he is at it
-
He's still better than either of those two.
But I agree, he should dump the TPP.
-
He's still better than either of those two.
But I agree, he should dump the TPP.
I will be honest with you. If he dropped the TPP and did not give implicit support of Hillary and explicit hate to Trump I would possibly warm to him a bit more. It has to be a shit position, to know you have not a hope in HELL even getting 15% of the vote. The Libertarian Parties policies are not terrible. They are just so small.
I think if you could have a bowlful of the Libertarian Party and a couple of healthy dollops of Republican policies and a couple of tablespoons of Green Party Progressivism and mix it up, you'd get a pretty good policies.
-
http://www.redstate.com/brandon_morse/2016/08/26/hilarious-accurate-ad-gary-johnson-vote-best-political-ad-ever/
-
http://www.redstate.com/brandon_morse/2016/08/26/hilarious-accurate-ad-gary-johnson-vote-best-political-ad-ever/
:lol1: :thumbup:
-
Gary Johnson is s nutjob. His party is even worse. No thanks,
-
Gary Johnson is s nutjob. His party is even worse. No thanks,
Nigga please!! The Johnson is one of the only sensible candidates running this season.
The Libertarians are socially tolerant and fiscally responsible, where the majority of the country is philosophically.
The majority of active duty military personnel support Johnson because of his non-interventionist policies.
-
The Federal dental appointment Commission has over 3,775 presidential candidates registered for the dental appointment. Can't we find some else besides these two?
WTF did I type dental appointment?
-
The Federal dental appointment Commission has over 3,775 presidential candidates registered for the dental appointment. Can't we find some else besides these two?
WTF did I type dental appointment?
I may have accidentally added something into the word filter. :P
-
The Federal dental appointment Commission has over 3,775 presidential candidates registered for the dental appointment. Can't we find some else besides these two?
WTF did I type dental appointment?
I may have accidentally added something into the word filter. :P
Interfering with Royal messages is treason. Off to the Tower with you.
-
The Federal dental appointment Commission has over 3,775 presidential candidates registered for the dental appointment. Can't we find some else besides these two?
WTF did I type dental appointment?
I may have accidentally added something into the word filter. :P
Tune in next week to censorship gone wrong, where Odeon says "Hey guys, you know what would be really cool? How about ANY time I dislike something you write I censor you?"
-
Bad dog.
-
Bad dog.
(http://www.informationliberation.com/files/dont_rape_plz_wristband.jpg)
-
(http://vignette2.wikia.nocookie.net/uncyclopedia/images/0/08/Peeing_dog.jpg/revision/latest?cb=20080501173152)
-
(http://vignette2.wikia.nocookie.net/uncyclopedia/images/0/08/Peeing_dog.jpg/revision/latest?cb=20080501173152)
(http://www.informationliberation.com/files/dont_rape_plz_wristband.jpg)
[/quote]
Why can't Swedish men protect their wives, daughters and sisters from the rape epidemic in their country? Don't you Swedish men care?
http://www.independent.co.uk/news/world/europe/sweden-and-denmark-have-highest-number-of-sexual-assaults-in-europe-a6800901.html
Do you care to dismiss this too? Rape apologia? I would rather be associated with a urinating dog than that.
-
The Federal dental appointment Commission has over 3,775 presidential candidates registered for the dental appointment. Can't we find some else besides these two?
WTF did I type dental appointment?
What did you mean to write??
-
https://youtu.be/Z0GFRcFm-aY
-
https://youtu.be/kUEk4MMSMzE
-
Why can't Swedish men protect their wives, daughters and sisters from the rape epidemic in their country? Don't you Swedish men care?
http://www.independent.co.uk/news/world/europe/sweden-and-denmark-have-highest-number-of-sexual-assaults-in-europe-a6800901.html
Do you care to dismiss this too? Rape apologia? I would rather be associated with a urinating dog than that.
You *are* associated with one. Idiot.
-
Why can't Swedish men protect their wives, daughters and sisters from the rape epidemic in their country? Don't you Swedish men care?
http://www.independent.co.uk/news/world/europe/sweden-and-denmark-have-highest-number-of-sexual-assaults-in-europe-a6800901.html
Do you care to dismiss this too? Rape apologia? I would rather be associated with a urinating dog than that.
You *are* associated with one. Idiot.
An association like that from a hypocrite, liar and rape apologist. Can't tell you how that wounds me
-
Why can't Swedish men protect their wives, daughters and sisters from the rape epidemic in their country? Don't you Swedish men care?
http://www.independent.co.uk/news/world/europe/sweden-and-denmark-have-highest-number-of-sexual-assaults-in-europe-a6800901.html
Do you care to dismiss this too? Rape apologia? I would rather be associated with a urinating dog than that.
You *are* associated with one. Idiot.
An association like that from a hypocrite, liar and rape apologist. Can't tell you how that wounds me
I don't actually care if it does or not. You remain an intellectually dishonest bigot and a liar regardless. :hahaha:
-
I was trying to remember where I heard the name Bill Weld. Wasn't he suspected of being Chelsea Clinton's Biological Father?
Bill Weld is a past governor of Massachusetts.
The man I've heard suggested as Chelsea's speculative father is Webb Hubbell.
-
Why can't Swedish men protect their wives, daughters and sisters from the rape epidemic in their country? Don't you Swedish men care?
http://www.independent.co.uk/news/world/europe/sweden-and-denmark-have-highest-number-of-sexual-assaults-in-europe-a6800901.html
Do you care to dismiss this too? Rape apologia? I would rather be associated with a urinating dog than that.
You *are* associated with one. Idiot.
An association like that from a hypocrite, liar and rape apologist. Can't tell you how that wounds me
I don't actually care if it does or not. You remain an intellectually dishonest bigot and a liar regardless. :hahaha:
I remain so because you proclaim me as such? I would have been shocked 6 months ago. Now I am happy for you to think whatever
-
Do you think Johnson has a shot at New Mexico?
-
Possibly, especially if he makes the debates.
-
Why can't Swedish men protect their wives, daughters and sisters from the rape epidemic in their country? Don't you Swedish men care?
http://www.independent.co.uk/news/world/europe/sweden-and-denmark-have-highest-number-of-sexual-assaults-in-europe-a6800901.html
Do you care to dismiss this too? Rape apologia? I would rather be associated with a urinating dog than that.
You *are* associated with one. Idiot.
An association like that from a hypocrite, liar and rape apologist. Can't tell you how that wounds me
I don't actually care if it does or not. You remain an intellectually dishonest bigot and a liar regardless. :hahaha:
I remain so because you proclaim me as such? I would have been shocked 6 months ago. Now I am happy for you to think whatever
Pot, kettle, etc.
-
This thread is about Gary Johnson, stay on topic DAMNIT!!! :MLA:
-
Who is Gary Johnson? :zoinks:
-
Someone you feel. :eyebrows:
(https://pics.onsizzle.com/youve-felt-the-bern-now-its-time-to-feel-the-2788769.png)
-
So if you vote for him,, he will repay you? :eyebrows:
-
(https://pics.onsizzle.com/feel-the-johnson-let-him-blow-a-load-of-liberty-2802439.png)
-
Found him! :zoinks:
http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/world-us-canada-37312015
-
Found him! :zoinks:
http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/world-us-canada-37312015
Obviously, he can't see Aleppo from the top of Mt. Everest. :M
-
Found him! :zoinks:
http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/world-us-canada-37312015
Obviously, he can't see Aleppo from the top of Mt. Everest. :M
He should probably stay there. :zoinks:
-
You're just jealous that he's more well traveled than you. :hahaha:
-
What's the point if he doesn't know basic geography? :hahaha:
-
Who the hell WANTS to go to Aleppo?? :dunno:
-
Who the hell WANTS to go to Aleppo?? :dunno:
It will not be a place worth travelling to for a very long time, thanks Hillary the Warhawk
-
Not her fault.
-
Not her fault.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/American-led_intervention_in_Syria
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hillary_Clinton
When was she in charge of foreign relations?
How did she do with foreign relations in Syria?
What about Libya?
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Fgcd1ghag5Y
The woman is evil.
-
I'm not sure how you think those Wikipedia links prove it's her fault, so let's throw in a couple more:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Battle_of_Aleppo_(2012%E2%80%93present)
http://edition.cnn.com/2016/06/22/politics/donald-trump-hillary-clinton-speech-fact-check/
Enjoy.
-
I'm not sure how you think those Wikipedia links prove it's her fault, so let's throw in a couple more:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Battle_of_Aleppo_(2012%E2%80%93present)
http://edition.cnn.com/2016/06/22/politics/donald-trump-hillary-clinton-speech-fact-check/
Enjoy.
This is what I got from the first link
Battle of Aleppo (2012–present
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Dialog-information on.svg Did you mean: Battle of Aleppo (2012–present)?
Look for Battle of Aleppo (2012–present on one of Wikipedia's sister projects:
Wiktionary-logo-v2.svg Wiktionary (free dictionary)
Wikibooks-logo.svg Wikibooks (free textbooks)
Wikiquote-logo.svg Wikiquote (quotations)
Wikisource-logo.svg Wikisource (free library)
Wikiversity-logo.svg Wikiversity (free learning resources)
Commons-logo.svg Commons (images and media)
Wikivoyage-Logo-v3-icon.svg Wikivoyage (free travel guide)
Wikinews-logo.svg Wikinews (free news source)
Wikidata-logo.svg Wikidata (free linked database)
Wikipedia does not have an article with this exact name. Please search for Battle of Aleppo (2012–present in Wikipedia to check for alternative titles or spellings.
Log in or create an account to start the Battle of Aleppo (2012–present article, alternatively use the Article Wizard, or add a request for it.
Search for "Battle of Aleppo (2012–present" in existing articles.
Look for pages within Wikipedia that link to this title.
Other reasons this message may be displayed:
If a page was recently created here, it may not be visible yet because of a delay in updating the database; wait a few minutes or try the purge function.
Titles on Wikipedia are case sensitive except for the first character; please check alternative capitalizations and consider adding a redirect here to the correct title.
If the page has been deleted, check the deletion log, and see Why was the page I created deleted?.
Not horribly informative.
What did I get from CNN....I admit I do not read from that site any more not after this admission that they were completely partisan in their reporting
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Nc5p5mD08D4
But thanks any way. Did not , not enjoy. Indifference really.
-
About as informative as your "argument", then.
-
About as informative as your "argument", then.
I do not think there is much to argue. Hillary was in charge of foreign policy before US invaded Syria and Libya and we have seen what this has done to the displacement of people in Europe since 2011.
Hillary is to foreign policy what diarrhea is to a romantic date. Hillary is evil.
-
The US invaded Syria?
I refer you again to http://edition.cnn.com/2016/06/22/politics/donald-trump-hillary-clinton-speech-fact-check/, specifically the section "Reality Check: Trump claims Clinton support for 'regime change' caused Syrian bloodshed".
Your arguments do not hold water. The phrasing is dramatic but the content nonexistent.
-
The US invaded Syria?
Do air strikes count as invasions?
-
The US invaded Syria?
Do air strikes count as invasions?
Yes, in my book.
-
The US invaded Syria?
Do air strikes count as invasions?
They count as attacks. An invasion is about invading with armed forces.
-
The US invaded Syria?
Do air strikes count as invasions?
They count as attacks. An invasion is about invading with armed forces.
In my book if you are invading their airspace and dropping a shit ton of exploding bombs that is an invasion. Not an invasion of infantry sure but an invasion none the less.
-
The air strikes against ISIS? As far as I know, those began in 2014. The US did provide aid to the Syrian rebels in the Syrian civil war but there were no air strikes. Hillary Clinton was in favour of them but Obama chose not to.
So I'm curious. What is the invasion you are talking about, and why do you blame Hillary for it when she was voted down?
-
The US invaded Syria?
Do air strikes count as invasions?
They count as attacks. An invasion is about invading with armed forces.
Pretty sure US armed forces fired some of those missiles.
-
The US invaded Syria?
Do air strikes count as invasions?
They count as attacks. An invasion is about invading with armed forces.
Pretty sure US armed forces fired some of those missiles.
And I'm basically talking about an invasion with ground troops, not missiles against ISIS.
-
The US invaded Syria?
Do air strikes count as invasions?
They count as attacks. An invasion is about invading with armed forces.
Pretty sure US armed forces fired some of those missiles.
And I'm basically talking about an invasion with ground troops, not missiles against ISIS.
Then we are talking at cross-purposes
-
You are mostly talking out of your arse, actually.
-
You are mostly talking out of your arse, actually.
You are projecting, "throwing your fart" so to speak.
-
You are mostly talking out of your arse, actually.
You are projecting, "throwing your fart" so to speak.
And you are avoiding the subject.
-
You are mostly talking out of your arse, actually.
You are projecting, "throwing your fart" so to speak.
And you are avoiding the subject.
Not at all. I consider dropping bombs on a country, an invasion.
-
We'll have to differ on this one, then.
-
We'll have to differ on this one, then.
No biggie
-
Air strikes without the permission of the UN Security Council, without consent of the targeted country's government, and without even notifying the attacked country's government of the intended locations of strike, is not only an invasion but also a violation of international law. Of course the US aren't the only ones, but calling it attacking ISIS doesn't negate the reality of Syria.
-
Air strikes without the permission of the UN Security Council, without consent of the targeted country's government, and without even notifying the attacked country's government of the intended locations of strike, is not only an invasion but also a violation of international law. Of course the US aren't the only ones, but calling it attacking ISIS doesn't negate the reality of Syria.
My thoughts too.
-
Air strikes without the permission of the UN Security Council, without consent of the targeted country's government, and without even notifying the attacked country's government of the intended locations of strike, is not only an invasion but also a violation of international law. Of course the US aren't the only ones, but calling it attacking ISIS doesn't negate the reality of Syria.
The air strikes *are* attacking ISIS, the intention being to "degrade and ultimately destroy" them. Whatever you want to call them, they aren't the cause of the misery in Syria.
-
they aren't the cause of the misery in Syria.
Not sure what that's supposed to mean.
-
they aren't the cause of the misery in Syria.
Not sure what that's supposed to mean.
I don't know either but it seems like it maybe that Syrians appreciate US doing air strikes on them but ISIS is giving them misery whilst not doing air strikes on them.
Some may think that line of thought is rational and even reasonable. I think it is fucking insane, personally.
-
Just thought I was talking about something else. :laugh:
-
Just thought I was talking about something else. :laugh:
People are quite okay to think whatever they think and sometimes the best place to keep such thoughts are locked away in the deepest confines of their minds
-
they aren't the cause of the misery in Syria.
Not sure what that's supposed to mean.
I don't know either but it seems like it maybe that Syrians appreciate US doing air strikes on them but ISIS is giving them misery whilst not doing air strikes on them.
Some may think that line of thought is rational and even reasonable. I think it is fucking insane, personally.
Er, no, I wasn't saying that at all.
-
they aren't the cause of the misery in Syria.
Not sure what that's supposed to mean.
I don't know either but it seems like it maybe that Syrians appreciate US doing air strikes on them but ISIS is giving them misery whilst not doing air strikes on them.
Some may think that line of thought is rational and even reasonable. I think it is fucking insane, personally.
Er, no, I wasn't saying that at all.
Quite honestly, who the Hell really knows what you are saying. You present one way the do something in contradiction. You switch and bait, misrepresent and lie, so who really knows?
Sorry, it's not going to happen. I'm perfectly happy to ignore him from now on, though.
Look at the time stamps.
-
Al, I was referring to the callout-related stuff re ignoring you, but you're right. I will now completely ignore you.
-
Al, I was referring to the callout-related stuff re ignoring you, but you're right. I will now completely ignore you.
Who knows?
-
Air strikes without the permission of the UN Security Council, without consent of the targeted country's government, and without even notifying the attacked country's government of the intended locations of strike, is not only an invasion but also a violation of international law. Of course the US aren't the only ones, but calling it attacking ISIS doesn't negate the reality of Syria.
The air strikes *are* attacking ISIS, the intention being to "degrade and ultimately destroy" them. Whatever you want to call them, they aren't the cause of the misery in Syria.
Air strike is not the cause of misery in Syria? Well Odeon is either lying or telling the truth. One or the other.
https://www.rt.com/news/359686-un-security-urgent-meeting/
Are the Syrians happy or unhappy?
-
I can't vote no good choices
Sent from my A462C using Tapatalk
-
My post-election predictions.
:meditate:
Trump will loose.
At least 3 allegations of sexual abuse including the one involving a 13-14 yr old minor will stick.
The IRS will audit him and he'll owe a couple of million in back taxes.
Melania is going to fly the coup after the election is over...and he will pay dearly to keep her quiet.
I think it will be an interesting train ride.
:popcorn:
What a fucked up election, I should have ran...I might have had a chance. ;)
-
My post-election predictions.
:meditate:
Trump will loose.
At least 3 allegations of sexual abuse including the one involving a 13-14 yr old minor will stick.
The IRS will audit him and he'll owe a couple of million in back taxes.
Melania is going to fly the coup after the election is over...and he will pay dearly to keep her quiet.
I think it will be an interesting train ride.
:popcorn:
What a fucked up election, I should have ran...I might have had a chance. ;)
No the 13-14 year old alleged rape will not stick. It's already been disproved and discredited. Google Norm Lubow, Trump, the Guardian.
Most of the other claims have been shown to be fabricated and the ones not proven to be will suffer from association.
It also doesn't help that the groping Donald narrative is proven to be manufactured since as least May by the democrat party, via leaked emails from John Podesta's computer via Wikileaks.
I thing this debate may give impetus to whomever wins
I think the damage being done by Project Veritas and Wikileaks will help. It certainly reversed a losing situation in Utah
Trump should be using his surrogates for selective speaking engagements, I think that he suffers only having he and Mike Pence holding rallies. Hillary does and she gets celebrities on board with helping her too.
I think depending on the way the debate goes will determine who sets the tone and gets momentum for the last leg of the campaign.
Hillary is shut scared what more damage Wikileaks can do and actually got the Ecuadorian embassy in London to cut Assange's internet access. It won't stop Wikileaks though and he was not the only one with the information. Big bombs are coming. But how much exposure will that get if the press is on Hillary's side?
Also I am interested what else Hillary has apart from false sexual assault claims? It could be very interesting and unlike Trump any new damning report will get seen everywhere
-
Hopefully, Trump will lose. Considering his less than adequate performance in debates, it should be a given, but surprisingly many people still believe some of his crap.
The average Trump supporter seems to be more gullible than most.
-
Hopefully, Trump will lose. Considering his less than adequate performance in debates, it should be a given, but surprisingly many people still believe some of his crap.
The average Trump supporter seems to be more gullible than most.
Hillary SHOULD be completely rolling him.
These fabricated scandals of Hillary's are well done from a technical standpoint. He cannot disprove them and they will stick to him. He will need to address them enough between now and the election and every mention will conversely remind people. Damned if he does and damned if he doesn't. If you think about it, it is perfect revenge too.
Hillary is playing to be silent on anything coming out. Their campaign bus pumping human waste on the side of the road for example, hardly a blip on the radar despite it leaching into many bodies of water in Georgia. Media will protect her.
If she HAS to acknowledge anything, she will deflect and lie. Why not? Two or three weeks, if she can bat it away until after then, it does not matter what they throw at her. Once she is secured as President Obama could pardon her and we are off to the races.
Trump HAS to sell his positions more. People know them but they need reminding and put that front in their mind past the allegation associations. He needs to publicly shoot a couple of them down rather than wave them off. He needs to also really send out his surrogates to selected areas. Have the Latinos for Trump and AJ Delgado talk to the Mexican contingent in New Mexico and Arizona about what has come out in the Wikileaks about the Hillary's campaign in respect to Catholics and to Mexicans being condescendingly referred to as needy. An easier task would be Mike Pence going to the small North Eastern states to discuss the proposed efforts against the church to the states there where approx 50% are Catholic.
I reckon Gays for Trump and Twinks for Trump could do the Orlando area and Mike Flynn should do Florida.
I reckon he has to do more than be stoic.
Hillary is getting celebrities to do her rallies. GREAT idea! Smart.
-
Not sure Trump knows what his positions are. The man is a disaster.
-
Not sure Trump knows what his positions are. The man is a disaster.
They both are. Hillary is gearing up for a war with Russia
-
Hillary's not a disaster. You just don't like her. Trump is, though. He is an imbecile and a disgrace to his country, a bigot without any redeeming qualities I can think of.
-
I do not like her AND she is a disaster. Difference.
-
(http://i.imgur.com/OGKuHeE.jpg)
I don't know where Allepo is.
I can't name a single head of state.
I'm probably high right now.
Why didn't this work??! >:(
-
This is like Malcolm Turnbull and Tony Abbott all over again.
Wait, no it's not. Nobody has even heard of those guys. Elections are only important if they are in America.
I always knew this, I just enjoy foreigners agreeing with me on it :)
-
This is like Malcolm Turnbull and Tony Abbott all over again.
Wait, no it's not. Nobody has even heard of those guys. Elections are only important if they are in America.
I always knew this, I just enjoy foreigners agreeing with me on it :)
Australian politics is boring. Generally speaking we elect a new one each term and have no investment in the process other than to punish the previous government by voting them out.
-
This is like Malcolm Turnbull and Tony Abbott all over again.
Wait, no it's not. Nobody has even heard of those guys. Elections are only important if they are in America.
I always knew this, I just enjoy foreigners agreeing with me on it :)
Australian politics is boring. Generally speaking we elect a new one each term and have no investment in the process other than to punish the previous government by voting them out.
All politics are boring unless they are RED WHITE and BLUE, in which case everyone from every country can't stop talking about it for months at a time.
AMERICUH, FUCK YEAH! Everyone else knows their gawdamm place.
-
:laugh:
-
It would be very weird indeed if the world came to a standstill whenever we voted for a government. Although I have to admit, even our current PM, who is an imbecile, appears to be amazingly competent when compared to this Johnson guy.
-
Now he's running to be a Senator.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=g6HX1-Qizmw
-
Australian politics is boring. Generally speaking we elect a new one each term and have no investment in the process other than to punish the previous government by voting them out.
Generally we elect a new one each term. Then it's a bit like Survivor, if the Prime Minister is too popular (with the voters) then his or her own party vote them off the island. If the new Prime Minister is too unpopular then his or her own party vote them off the island. It is extremely rare for a Prime Minister to be not-too-popular and not-too-unpopular enough to survive a full term. We have had 6 Prime Ministers since 2007 and not one of them has served a full term.
-
Now he's running to be a Senator.
With the current state of what we have allowed to happen in this country, a Two Party system, I do not believe that a Libertarian or an Independent has a snowball's chance of ever getting elected to any substantial office.
I do not need to see any of your whataboutisms, but you know I am right. I will admit to a few having passed through Congress, but they are hamstrung from the outset.
President Trump may be as close to firing a Romulan Disruptor at the ingrained system as we may ever be.
-
Now he's running to be a Senator.
With the current state of what we have allowed to happen in this country, a Two Party system, I do not believe that a Libertarian or an Independent has a snowball's chance of ever getting elected to any substantial office.
I do not need to see any of your whataboutisms, but you know I am right. I will admit to a few having passed through Congress, but they are hamstrung from the outset.
President Trump may be as close to firing a Romulan Disruptor at the ingrained system as we may ever be.
As it stands, Gary has about 22% of a 3 way vote. To put it in football parlance, he's 14 points down with 3:00 left in the game. Not impossible but not easy.
-
Now he's running to be a Senator.
With the current state of what we have allowed to happen in this country, a Two Party system, I do not believe that a Libertarian or an Independent has a snowball's chance of ever getting elected to any substantial office.
I do not need to see any of your whataboutisms, but you know I am right. I will admit to a few having passed through Congress, but they are hamstrung from the outset.
President Trump may be as close to firing a Romulan Disruptor at the ingrained system as we may ever be.
Providing counter-examples is NOT "what-aboutism". It is clear evidence that there are exceptions.
"What-aboutism" is an attempt to deflect an argument, by showing a case where it didn't apply in
the exact same manner, even thought there are differences in circumstances.
-
Vote for the other Gary for congress. :zoinks:
Go For Gary 2018