INTENSITY²

Arena for the Competitive => Main Event Callouts => Topic started by: 'andersom' on February 26, 2016, 04:39:39 AM

Title: Al, Zegh and Kittenburger, I'm challenging the three of you.
Post by: 'andersom' on February 26, 2016, 04:39:39 AM
Al, Zegh and Kittenburger, I'm challenging the three of you.

I'm challenging the three of you to take a break and stop baiting and chasing each-other in this "intense" way.

It is bloody annoying. And it has been going on for long enough to take a break. The call-out between Al and Zegh started 8 months ago. And now it is all over the board, because it never stopped.

All three of you have the power to change the posting pattern you have made together. So I'm challenging all three of you.

And if the three of you think this is still too much fun to stop it, please confine yourself to a few threads then, and stay away from one another in other threads, while still posting fun or interesting things in those threads where you leave each other be.
Title: Re: Al, Zegh and Kittenburger, I'm challenging the three of you.
Post by: Al Swearegen on February 26, 2016, 06:03:53 AM
Al, Zegh and Kittenburger, I'm challenging the three of you.

I'm challenging the three of you to take a break and stop baiting and chasing each-other in this "intense" way.

It is bloody annoying. And it has been going on for long enough to take a break. The call-out between Al and Zegh started 8 months ago. And now it is all over the board, because it never stopped.

All three of you have the power to change the posting pattern you have made together. So I'm challenging all three of you.

And if the three of you think this is still too much fun to stop it, please confine yourself to a few threads then, and stay away from one another in other threads, while still posting fun or interesting things in those threads where you leave each other be.

I am very drubnk. That said I a m always happy to have a callout.
This requerst looks more like a suggestion than a callout. I probably am not picking up on the nuance. Not to worry.
You said our feud has never stopped. Correct. I am in agreement so far.
Alkl three of us have the power to change the way we post. Correct. Either individually or collectively we can change our posting patterns or styles or.....I dunno....anything else. Still agree with you.
You challenge me? Okay?
You are requesting we change how we post. That is not a challenge that is asking or requersting us collectively to do something, yes? I am kind of lost.
Title: Re: Al, Zegh and Kittenburger, I'm challenging the three of you.
Post by: 'andersom' on February 26, 2016, 06:20:00 AM
I am very drubnk. That said I a m always happy to have a callout.
This requerst looks more like a suggestion than a callout. I probably am not picking up on the nuance. Not to worry.
You said our feud has never stopped. Correct. I am in agreement so far.
Alkl three of us have the power to change the way we post. Correct. Either individually or collectively we can change our posting patterns or styles or.....I dunno....anything else. Still agree with you.
You challenge me? Okay?
You are requesting we change how we post. That is not a challenge that is asking or requersting us collectively to do something, yes? I am kind of lost.

Cheers! Have a great Friday night.

Will come back to this later. Not asking anything collective.

Now am going to dye some hair. Will be back.



Edit,

I messed up the quotes. Hope I fixed it now.
Title: Re: Al, Zegh and Kittenburger, I'm challenging the three of you.
Post by: Al Swearegen on February 26, 2016, 06:29:02 AM
I am very drubnk. That said I a m always happy to have a callout.
This requerst looks more like a suggestion than a callout. I probably am not picking up on the nuance. Not to worry.
You said our feud has never stopped. Correct. I am in agreement so far.
Alkl three of us have the power to change the way we post. Correct. Either individually or collectively we can change our posting patterns or styles or.....I dunno....anything else. Still agree with you.
You challenge me? Okay?
You are requesting we change how we post. That is not a challenge that is asking or requersting us collectively to do something, yes? I am kind of lost.

Cheers! Have a great Friday night.

Will come back to this later. Not asking anything collective.

Now am going to dye some hair. Will be back.

Really confused with what is going on. I do not even pretend I know how yo attempt thsi callout
Title: Re: Al, Zegh and Kittenburger, I'm challenging the three of you.
Post by: Bastet on February 26, 2016, 06:51:17 AM
I challenge Zegh to stop being s liar and a hypocrite my two pet peeves
Title: Re: Al, Zegh and Kittenburger, I'm challenging the three of you.
Post by: Al Swearegen on February 26, 2016, 07:42:53 AM
Actually this is cool. I am now going back through all my posts for the last 8 or so months to have a look at this. I had not given myuch thought on it but its probably good to stir it all up again.

I think THIS is about where everything started
The Ginseng Forum / Re: The confusion of neo-conservativism, feminism, islam and anti-islam.
« on: June 25, 2015, 03:13:08 AM »

Of course that was the pre-cursor to a callout

Main Event Callouts / Re: Why Zegh is dishonest and intellectually bankrupt & needs to stick to Stoner Jokes
« on: June 29, 2015, 05:06:36 AM »

The thread that happened to hit on a lot of the same ideological positrions as the Islam thread and probably the crux of the deterioration of things was

What's your crime? Basic Discussion / Re: Confederate Flag appreciation thread.
« on: July 06, 2015, 02:31:17 AM »

Around the 10 July 2015 was when the threads were basically were basically over is where i will tally from (and remainder posts that occur in these threee threads I will not include and they will be of no consequence as there may be one or two posts but that is it).

His replies got boring to read by

Anti Philosophy / Re: I don't know if anyone has though of this, but here it is.
« on: November 22, 2015, 07:28:19 PM »

I started limiting the amount I actually read off his dribble.

"What? I just saw that I started something? 
I read bits and snippets. It makes his posts more interesting.  I have no idea what I started. It may have had something to do with me posting hurtful pictures of clowns. Edward from Twilight or the Flintstones.  Hurtful I tell you."


On  « on: December 07, 2015, 02:30:25 AM » for some reason ther was a huge resurgence on the Confederation thread? (Dunno what about?)

Up to Re: Al, Zegh and Kittenburger, I'm challenging the three of you.
« on: Today at 06:03:53 AM »

So....8 months niggled Zegh in a total of ............14 threads in 8 months! Approximately  one thread every 17 days he gets niggled in.

But how many thread in total have I contributed in that I have NOT niggled in, in that time?

109.

I know you thinjk there is a problem that needs addressing and given the figures I would like to know what it is?

Are you saying one thread every 17 days is too much fopr IntensitySquared? Or perhaps too much for Zegh?

Are you saying that you want MORE niggling over fewer threads in 8 months than 17? If so how many threads in the nexxt 8 months and by what measure do we calculate this? Or is it a percentage? 14/109 = 12.8%. Dio you want it below thios percentage? If so, How much below? What is the metric and how to calculate this?

PLease let me know what you are asking.

At tyhe moment I simply have no idea. None really. This is all kind oif unexpected and I do not know what to make of it

I know this is notr aimed at me and perhaps the other two you are calling iout will do a lot better than I. But then again Zegh has made it very clear he doesn't "do" callouts. So unless he is a liar, I suspect he will not answer. That leaves Kittenburger. I can't answer for her but I would postulate (and admit I may be wrong) that she will needle only when he says dumb crap. He does that a lot. The IntensitySquared that I joined in 2009 was very much geared around calling out people for dumb shit....but then I am not going to preach to the converted because YOU are on I2 and YOU are calling US out. I know that you embrace the calling out of dumb crap.

Title: Re: Al, Zegh and Kittenburger, I'm challenging the three of you.
Post by: 'andersom' on February 26, 2016, 08:45:32 AM
Is it a proper call-out? I don't know.

But I got a pm telling me I was too fond of Zegh, if I read it correctly. I answered that I was not going to discuss members behind the scenes, AFF has taught me that. Said I was willing to take it in the open. Nothing happened. And I am miffed by the continued feud, fed by the three of you. So, I made this challenge.

And yes, Al, you do post in other threads too, and I respond to them. But threads by Zegh seem to derail into the same theme everytime. And it is the three of you keeping that pattern in tact.

Zegh keeps reacting like "see you are following me around like I predicted" and then suggesting he is sad his threads get derailed, but he wanted it himself, so that makes no sense. Al follows Zegh like Zegh wants him to do, because Al knows he is getting on Zegh's nerves. And Kittenburger follows suit, because she has beef with Zegh. And it never stops, it keeps going on in circles. It's the same banter and the same words with minor changes for over 8 months. And I get annoyed.

Yes, Al likes to troll, and he is pretty good at it. Zegh likes to troll too, he's a bit more lazy and lax in trolling than Al, but he likes it, and now and then has surprising tactics. So far, so good. I don't mind.

But nothing new happens, bar from Al posting cat pictures. And for something without anything new or interesting happening for me as a beholder, I find 17 threads pretty much.

So, I'll change the challenge. (Taking my women's prerogative :P, Nah, just me understanding more what I am bored by. ). Either stop it, or make it fun to watch. 
Title: Re: Al, Zegh and Kittenburger, I'm challenging the three of you.
Post by: ZEGH8578 on February 26, 2016, 08:54:44 AM
Hyke, none of this is "proper"

It's a "mind game", and none of it will be played "honestly", so - once again, I see no point in adhering to a call-out.

I mean, what _exactly_ am I supposed to say to "liar and hypocrite"? "No"? "No, u!"?

And "bar for Al posting cat pictures", try to find anywhere where I have followed either Al or burger around, and tried to provoke a reaction out of them, at the cost of other people's threads?
Fine one single instance.

So! The suggestion then becomes: Al and burger, stop trolling. Zegh, stop being stalked! Stop that now!
I would if I could!

As for ignoring them? Tried, doesn't work. Why does it not work? Because:
1. They are not children, and "ignore them" only works with children.
2. They can read this. They can see you when you say "just ignore them", so they think "Ha! As if that's gonna work!" and up their involvement.
3. Why should I ignore then, why can't they try to ignore me? :V

SO

I'm not going to ignore, because it has no effect
I'm not going to play ball, because there is no real merit to it, it will only become a rethorical piss-test, who can say shit like "project" or "hypocrite" the most.

I am going to do the following:
I am going to make new threads, and reply IN threads. Whenever Al posts a goatsex pic or whatever, I will or will not respond, it's going to depend on my mood. I might make my response humorous, or I might not. It will also depend on my mood.
Al can do whatever he wants, but JUST to poke him: I challenge him to keep this up forever and also up his intensity so that it becomes impossible for anyone else to post here. For example, if I casually reply in a thread, I challenge Al to wreck 5 threads as a direct result.
Are you up for the challenge Al? Mindgame - GO!
Title: Re: Al, Zegh and Kittenburger, I'm challenging the three of you.
Post by: Bastet on February 26, 2016, 08:56:55 AM
Look who's lying again. You started taunting al you made sanctimonious remarks to me.
Title: Re: Al, Zegh and Kittenburger, I'm challenging the three of you.
Post by: ZEGH8578 on February 26, 2016, 09:04:02 AM
Look who's lying again. You started taunting al you made sanctimonious remarks to me.

I didn't say anything about who started it, you little retard.
1. I started it with Al, I told him to not be such a hopeless autist. Ever since: WAAH WAAH WAAH
2. I called you an idiot. WAAH WAAH WAAH

That's it. Yes. I started it. Boo fuckin hoo, seriously, go fuck yourself. There, I started it again. Christ, what a pair of fucking crybabies. Idiot.
Title: Re: Al, Zegh and Kittenburger, I'm challenging the three of you.
Post by: ZEGH8578 on February 26, 2016, 09:05:22 AM
I'm beginning to suspect this can be solved too damn easily, so, here goes

Kittenburger, I'm sorry for calling you an idiot. You aren't an idiot!
Al, I'm sorry I told you to control your autism. You need to do no such thing!


Re-sized, so that it cannot be missed.
Title: Re: Al, Zegh and Kittenburger, I'm challenging the three of you.
Post by: Bastet on February 26, 2016, 09:06:32 AM
Look who's lying again. You started taunting al you made sanctimonious remarks to me.

I didn't say anything about who started it, you little retard.
1. I started it with Al, I told him to not be such a hopeless autist. Ever since: WAAH WAAH WAAH
2. I called you an idiot. WAAH WAAH WAAH

That's it. Yes. I started it. Boo fuckin hoo, seriously, go fuck yourself. There, I started it again. Christ, what a pair of fucking crybabies. Idiot.


There he goes again. Not at all hypocritical.    :clap:
Title: Re: Al, Zegh and Kittenburger, I'm challenging the three of you.
Post by: Al Swearegen on February 26, 2016, 09:07:37 AM
Is it a proper call-out? I don't know.

But I got a pm telling me I was too fond of Zegh, if I read it correctly. I answered that I was not going to discuss members behind the scenes, AFF has taught me that. Said I was willing to take it in the open. Nothing happened. And I am miffed by the continued feud, fed by the three of you. So, I made this challenge.

And yes, Al, you do post in other threads too, and I respond to them. But threads by Zegh seem to derail into the same theme everytime. And it is the three of you keeping that pattern in tact.

Zegh keeps reacting like "see you are following me around like I predicted" and then suggesting he is sad his threads get derailed, but he wanted it himself, so that makes no sense. Al follows Zegh like Zegh wants him to do, because Al knows he is getting on Zegh's nerves. And Kittenburger follows suit, because she has beef with Zegh. And it never stops, it keeps going on in circles. It's the same banter and the same words with minor changes for over 8 months. And I get annoyed.

Yes, Al likes to troll, and he is pretty good at it. Zegh likes to troll too, he's a bit more lazy and lax in trolling than Al, but he likes it, and now and then has surprising tactics. So far, so good. I don't mind.

But nothing new happens, bar from Al posting cat pictures. And for something without anything new or interesting happening for me as a beholder, I find 17 threads pretty much.

So, I'll change the challenge. (Taking my women's prerogative :P, Nah, just me understanding more what I am bored by. ). Either stop it, or make it fun to watch.

Sorry Hyke, I can nopt "make" it fun to watch. I am not responsible for anyone's interpretations or enjoynment of anything. I never havebeen and I never will take up such a responsibility .....EVER.

So right off the block THAT is not going to happen.

So I understabnd from what you said that 14 threads in 8 months (No it was not more than this - some of these 14 threads conttained one or two posts but most were containing multiple posts), was too much. 12.8% of my posts in the last 8 months focussing on Zegh was too much for you to bear. OKay. I am a bit dunk and at LEAST I understand THIS point.

It is something solid I can address 14 threads that I teased Zegh in 8 months out of myu 109 threads that I posted in (12.87%) is no good. Whether I agree or not is neither here nor there. At least we have a starting point.

If we accept that I am not in the least bit responsible for what you may or may not find enjopyable on I2 (and visa versa - and indeed this applies to EVERYONE on I2) then we have at least found that teasing anopther member in 14 threads over 109 thread (yes i manually couynted them for accuracy) is too much.

I ask simplt what is the standard if 14 threads is too myuch in 8 months? 10? 5? 2? 1? If we are down to negotiation, then I am okay with this. What is being requested or what measuring or what indicator.

I know you are NOT trying to police I2 Hyke and I know you are just throwing this around. happy to look at what is bweing asked. Happy to consider any proposal.
Title: Re: Al, Zegh and Kittenburger, I'm challenging the three of you.
Post by: ZEGH8578 on February 26, 2016, 09:09:27 AM
Hehehe, are someone trying to police your I2 Al? WAAAH WAAAH WAAAH, you could be the siren!

Oh shit, I started it again!
Better apologize!

I'm sorry Al, you aren't a siren!

(also, those are some impressive writing skills Al!)
Title: Re: Al, Zegh and Kittenburger, I'm challenging the three of you.
Post by: Al Swearegen on February 26, 2016, 09:12:02 AM
Hehehe, are someone trying to police your I2 Al? WAAAH WAAAH WAAAH, you could be the siren!

Oh shit, I started it again!
Better apologize!

I'm sorry Al, you aren't a siren!

(http://www.craveonline.com/images/stories/2011/comedy/stance-ninja-cat.jpg)

I dunno what you said. You are priobably 100% right. Maybe? But here, have a Ninja Cat
Title: Re: Al, Zegh and Kittenburger, I'm challenging the three of you.
Post by: Bastet on February 26, 2016, 09:19:37 AM
Quick apologise for being born!
Title: Re: Al, Zegh and Kittenburger, I'm challenging the three of you.
Post by: Bastet on February 26, 2016, 09:24:39 AM
I'm beginning to suspect this can be solved too damn easily, so, here goes

Kittenburger, I'm sorry for calling you an idiot. You aren't an idiot!
Al, I'm sorry I told you to control your autism. You need to do no such thing!


Re-sized, so that it cannot be missed.

You can apologize for being a liar and a hypocrite then stop doing it.
Title: Re: Al, Zegh and Kittenburger, I'm challenging the three of you.
Post by: Al Swearegen on February 26, 2016, 09:29:50 AM
Is it a proper call-out? I don't know.

But I got a pm telling me I was too fond of Zegh, if I read it correctly. I answered that I was not going to discuss members behind the scenes, AFF has taught me that. Said I was willing to take it in the open.....

I missed this bit completely. ( I weonder how?)

Anyhoo. I remember AFF and the incident you reference. I can only presume you are taslking to me as the only one of the three involved in that particular incident. (possibly a good juncture to stop Zegh's salivary glands going overbopard by letting him know I was on the side of angels in this). Woman from Mars vs Logical conclusion and Lucy. Who got evidence of LC's doxing? Me, right?

Personallty? I take it as read that KB hates Zegh and everyone else likes him. That is my my assumption. I do not care if this is right or wriong. Why would his popularity figure into my assessemnt or treatment of him?
 
I do not really care who sends PM's about who over what. Most of what I get in PM is exchanging of pleasantries and I like that.

Title: Re: Al, Zegh and Kittenburger, I'm challenging the three of you.
Post by: Bastet on February 26, 2016, 09:49:17 AM
Is it a proper call-out? I don't know.

But I got a pm telling me I was too fond of Zegh, if I read it correctly. I answered that I was not going to discuss members behind the scenes, AFF has taught me that. Said I was willing to take it in the open.....

I missed this bit completely. ( I weonder how?)

Anyhoo. I remember AFF and the incident you reference. I can only presume you are taslking to me as the only one of the three involved in that particular incident. (possibly a good juncture to stop Zegh's salivary glands going overbopard by letting him know I was on the side of angels in this). Woman from Mars vs Logical conclusion and Lucy. Who got evidence of LC's doxing? Me, right?

Personallty? I take it as read that KB hates Zegh and everyone else likes him. That is my my assumption. I do not care if this is right or wriong. Why would his popularity figure into my assessemnt or treatment of him?
 
I do not really care who sends PM's about who over what. Most of what I get in PM is exchanging of pleasantries and I like that.

i said he's a liar and a hypocrite which I've said over and over out here but she sees something else she's too autistic.
Title: Re: Al, Zegh and Kittenburger, I'm challenging the three of you.
Post by: Al Swearegen on February 26, 2016, 10:01:39 AM
Is it a proper call-out? I don't know.

But I got a pm telling me I was too fond of Zegh, if I read it correctly. I answered that I was not going to discuss members behind the scenes, AFF has taught me that. Said I was willing to take it in the open.....

I missed this bit completely. ( I weonder how?)

Anyhoo. I remember AFF and the incident you reference. I can only presume you are taslking to me as the only one of the three involved in that particular incident. (possibly a good juncture to stop Zegh's salivary glands going overbopard by letting him know I was on the side of angels in this). Woman from Mars vs Logical conclusion and Lucy. Who got evidence of LC's doxing? Me, right?

Personallty? I take it as read that KB hates Zegh and everyone else likes him. That is my my assumption. I do not care if this is right or wriong. Why would his popularity figure into my assessemnt or treatment of him?
 
I do not really care who sends PM's about who over what. Most of what I get in PM is exchanging of pleasantries and I like that.

i said he's a liar and a hypocrite which I've said over and over out here but she sees something else she's too autistic.

In AFF the culture was not as it was here. You were thre and so I am not going to preach to the converted. There was a usel;ess piece of crap called Lucy. She actually came here, calling herself "Bob' and hioping it would save her.
Essentially she had followed Woman friom Mars over from another forum. once there she started attacking WFM. She quickly found that not only was this not allowed on AFF but a small band of us were blocking her . Hyke was one of those people and so was I.
So she worke out that going to PM's was the best option. She harassed shit out of WFM by PM BUt she tried targeting people she thought she could sway to her opinion. She finally had some success with some Amerivcan Idiot. I THINK his nam,e was Logical Conclusion but this was a million years ago. By PM they both arranged that HE was to call her to see whether WFM was ACTUALLY a woman and SHE would supply the deatils.
It shook HELL out of WFM (who at the time was a very sick lady) and it was all kept secret. We suspected we knew who was behind it and so forth. Lucy kepyt her innocence up. I then got the nail in the coffin for Lucy and LC. I went after them both. He was banned and she followed soon after. She later followed me here and I pwned shiit out of her.
Hyke has EVERY reason to hate PM's. This was no fairytale or excuse. This is history.
Title: Re: Al, Zegh and Kittenburger, I'm challenging the three of you.
Post by: Bastet on February 26, 2016, 10:07:19 AM
Is it a proper call-out? I don't know.

But I got a pm telling me I was too fond of Zegh, if I read it correctly. I answered that I was not going to discuss members behind the scenes, AFF has taught me that. Said I was willing to take it in the open.....

I missed this bit completely. ( I weonder how?)

Anyhoo. I remember AFF and the incident you reference. I can only presume you are taslking to me as the only one of the three involved in that particular incident. (possibly a good juncture to stop Zegh's salivary glands going overbopard by letting him know I was on the side of angels in this). Woman from Mars vs Logical conclusion and Lucy. Who got evidence of LC's doxing? Me, right?

Personallty? I take it as read that KB hates Zegh and everyone else likes him. That is my my assumption. I do not care if this is right or wriong. Why would his popularity figure into my assessemnt or treatment of him?
 
I do not really care who sends PM's about who over what. Most of what I get in PM is exchanging of pleasantries and I like that.

i said he's a liar and a hypocrite which I've said over and over out here but she sees something else she's too autistic.

In AFF the culture was not as it was here. You were thre and so I am not going to preach to the converted. There was a usel;ess piece of crap called Lucy. She actually came here, calling herself "Bob' and hioping it would save her.
Essentially she had followed Woman friom Mars over from another forum. once there she started attacking WFM. She quickly found that not only was this not allowed on AFF but a small band of us were blocking her . Hyke was one of those people and so was I.
So she worke out that going to PM's was the best option. She harassed shit out of WFM by PM BUt she tried targeting people she thought she could sway to her opinion. She finally had some success with some Amerivcan Idiot. I THINK his nam,e was Logical Conclusion but this was a million years ago. By PM they both arranged that HE was to call her to see whether WFM was ACTUALLY a woman and SHE would supply the deatils.
It shook HELL out of WFM (who at the time was a very sick lady) and it was all kept secret. We suspected we knew who was behind it and so forth. Lucy kepyt her innocence up. I then got the nail in the coffin for Lucy and LC. I went after them both. He was banned and she followed soon after. She later followed me here and I pwned shiit out of her.
Hyke has EVERY reason to hate PM's. This was no fairytale or excuse. This is history.


Was this before I was a member because I don't remember those people.
Title: Re: Al, Zegh and Kittenburger, I'm challenging the three of you.
Post by: Al Swearegen on February 26, 2016, 10:10:02 AM
Is it a proper call-out? I don't know.

But I got a pm telling me I was too fond of Zegh, if I read it correctly. I answered that I was not going to discuss members behind the scenes, AFF has taught me that. Said I was willing to take it in the open.....

I missed this bit completely. ( I weonder how?)

Anyhoo. I remember AFF and the incident you reference. I can only presume you are taslking to me as the only one of the three involved in that particular incident. (possibly a good juncture to stop Zegh's salivary glands going overbopard by letting him know I was on the side of angels in this). Woman from Mars vs Logical conclusion and Lucy. Who got evidence of LC's doxing? Me, right?

Personallty? I take it as read that KB hates Zegh and everyone else likes him. That is my my assumption. I do not care if this is right or wriong. Why would his popularity figure into my assessemnt or treatment of him?
 
I do not really care who sends PM's about who over what. Most of what I get in PM is exchanging of pleasantries and I like that.

i said he's a liar and a hypocrite which I've said over and over out here but she sees something else she's too autistic.

In AFF the culture was not as it was here. You were thre and so I am not going to preach to the converted. There was a usel;ess piece of crap called Lucy. She actually came here, calling herself "Bob' and hioping it would save her.
Essentially she had followed Woman friom Mars over from another forum. once there she started attacking WFM. She quickly found that not only was this not allowed on AFF but a small band of us were blocking her . Hyke was one of those people and so was I.
So she worke out that going to PM's was the best option. She harassed shit out of WFM by PM BUt she tried targeting people she thought she could sway to her opinion. She finally had some success with some Amerivcan Idiot. I THINK his nam,e was Logical Conclusion but this was a million years ago. By PM they both arranged that HE was to call her to see whether WFM was ACTUALLY a woman and SHE would supply the deatils.
It shook HELL out of WFM (who at the time was a very sick lady) and it was all kept secret. We suspected we knew who was behind it and so forth. Lucy kepyt her innocence up. I then got the nail in the coffin for Lucy and LC. I went after them both. He was banned and she followed soon after. She later followed me here and I pwned shiit out of her.
Hyke has EVERY reason to hate PM's. This was no fairytale or excuse. This is history.


Was this before I was a member because I don't remember those people.

I'd say before.

It would not change her ditrust of PM's though. It is not her trying to strike out at you . WFM wasreally sick (dying) an dLucy./Bob was a psycho
Title: Re: Al, Zegh and Kittenburger, I'm challenging the three of you.
Post by: Bastet on February 26, 2016, 02:10:35 PM
https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=T0xoKiH8JJM
Title: Re: Al, Zegh and Kittenburger, I'm challenging the three of you.
Post by: lutra on February 26, 2016, 04:17:31 PM
Pathetic shite all three produce versus the other, imo.. Uhm, like I do most of the time also.. (other perception/in a different light)

*farts up two m³*
Title: Re: Al, Zegh and Kittenburger, I'm challenging the three of you.
Post by: 'andersom' on February 26, 2016, 05:14:13 PM
Wasn't the WFM thing Al, I was away from AFF for half a year when that happened. Did not recognise the site back when I returned. Distrust everywhere. And when the site then fell to pieces with Amy melting down there first were rescue attempts behind the scenes via PM. Noble and such. Then came the distrust, who was good, who was evil, who was to be thrown out of the circle of confidants. People got completely paranoid about their online safety. About their IP addresses and such, things got more and more secluded. This went on in a different way on Spectrumites. I got warned to stay clear of you, because you apparently are a really horrible man, and I would regret it to my dying day if I stayed in contact with you. (Still not regretting it) There were attempts to get people banned, or keep them banned forever preemptively behind the scenes. There was all kinds of shit going on and I got sick of it. I got a slap on the wrist as an admin, when I told a very much "loved" member to stop his shit. I left there because of the culture behind the scenes.

Don't get me wrong, I like PMs, but they are personal messages to me. It may be related to the site, but the moment I get warnings a person cannot be trusted or things like that I get really triggered.

To me this PM was the trigger on top of being incredibly bored by the "feud".
Title: Re: Al, Zegh and Kittenburger, I'm challenging the three of you.
Post by: 'andersom' on February 26, 2016, 05:37:58 PM
My internet connection is horrible, my access to I2 even worse. Between this post and the one I made before I have logged in three times. Have cleaned and cleared cache and cookies, have rebooted. So, about to call it a night.

Title: Re: Al, Zegh and Kittenburger, I'm challenging the three of you.
Post by: Al Swearegen on February 26, 2016, 07:31:42 PM
Pathetic shite all three produce versus the other, imo.. Uhm, like I do most of the time also.. (other perception/in a different light)

*farts up two m³*

Lutra wrong thread. Peanut gallery is where you need to be.
Title: Re: Al, Zegh and Kittenburger, I'm challenging the three of you.
Post by: Al Swearegen on February 26, 2016, 08:38:00 PM
Holy crap! I feel terrible. That said, I have been  looking over what I wrote. Terrible spelling aside, I think it is reasonably coherent and cogent.

I think as I pointed out last night 12.8% of thread I posted in have at least one niggle at Zegh. I am perfectly fine with that. Hyke is not. So far there is no real contention. Hyke challenges me to accept responsibility for her happiness in what I post from here in. I refuse that challenge in the most absolute terms. No one ought to be made responsible for someone else's happiness. So THAT is off the table unless either Zegh or Kittenburger wish to accept it.

So where are we? What is the point of the callout? Or was that it? If there is anything else with this callout that is more than the preceding paragraph, I am all for it. Otherwise I am happy to see what Kittenburger says. (I have long stopped reading Zegh. It does mean I can not predict what he says. "I didn't do anything. Its those other two. They have poor social skills. They are so Autistic. I am not the problem. Tell them to stop. Al I dare you to do X. See everyone, he is doing X now. See how bad he is. I am a victim and you must not see me as part of the problem. I draw shit out of dinosaurs".)


Title: Re: Al, Zegh and Kittenburger, I'm challenging the three of you.
Post by: 'andersom' on February 27, 2016, 12:49:42 AM

i said he's a liar and a hypocrite which I've said over and over out here but she sees something else she's too autistic.

Bit more than that. You pm-ed me, because I had supported Zegh in the call-out 8 months ago. So apparently this is really serious business right now. Because what I said 8 months ago mattered enough to PM me the other day. PEANUT GALLERY stuff that important?

And, you backed your allegations up with information on IP locations of one of the community sockpuppet's incarnations.

WTF? What do I need to know about IP locations of members? Staff can check that for trolls, banned people and sockpuppets, and that's the only use they should have, unless crimes are happening. And even then, it's not that hard to trick IP numbers.

I'm here on a forum, it's not so serious that there needs to be tracking of the real life location of members.
Title: Re: Al, Zegh and Kittenburger, I'm challenging the three of you.
Post by: 'andersom' on February 27, 2016, 12:54:43 AM
but JUST to poke him: I challenge him to keep this up forever and also up his intensity so that it becomes impossible for anyone else to post here. For example, if I casually reply in a thread, I challenge Al to wreck 5 threads as a direct result.
Are you up for the challenge Al? Mindgame - GO!

Thanks for posting this. I could not really be arsed to look through more than eight months of posts. And I am not someone making and keeping copies of shoutbox entries.

This is what I mean. You poke Al. So you will get a response.
Title: Re: Al, Zegh and Kittenburger, I'm challenging the three of you.
Post by: 'andersom' on February 27, 2016, 01:00:43 AM
So, I guess the challenge is over here.

Thanks for answering to all three of you.

My conclusion now is that Al and Zegh are not going to accept my challenge because they like it. OK. I can live with that.
And I fear Kittenburger takes it too serious.

If I'm wrong, I'll read that later. 
Title: Re: Al, Zegh and Kittenburger, I'm challenging the three of you.
Post by: Al Swearegen on February 27, 2016, 01:11:35 AM
So, I guess the challenge is over here.

Thanks for answering to all three of you.

My conclusion now is that Al and Zegh are not going to accept my challenge because they like it. OK. I can live with that.
And I fear Kittenburger takes it too serious.

If I'm wrong, I'll read that later.

I can't answer for the others but have never denied that it amuses me. It is a quirk. Sorry I was so mindlessly drunk through most of it :P
Title: Re: Al, Zegh and Kittenburger, I'm challenging the three of you.
Post by: 'andersom' on February 27, 2016, 01:22:06 AM
So, I guess the challenge is over here.

Thanks for answering to all three of you.

My conclusion now is that Al and Zegh are not going to accept my challenge because they like it. OK. I can live with that.
And I fear Kittenburger takes it too serious.

If I'm wrong, I'll read that later.

I can't answer for the others but have never denied that it amuses me. It is a quirk. Sorry I was so mindlessly drunk through most of it :P

There's something about you drinking and being in call-outs. I sense a pattern.   
:smarty:

Title: Re: Al, Zegh and Kittenburger, I'm challenging the three of you.
Post by: Al Swearegen on February 27, 2016, 01:30:28 AM
I think people pick on me when I am drunk and defenceless.  ;)
Title: Re: Al, Zegh and Kittenburger, I'm challenging the three of you.
Post by: 'andersom' on February 27, 2016, 01:38:54 AM
I think people pick on me when I am drunk and defenceless.  ;)

Awwwwwwwww.

Title: Re: Al, Zegh and Kittenburger, I'm challenging the three of you.
Post by: ZEGH8578 on February 27, 2016, 12:04:15 PM
And lol @ being the subject of PMs. I definitely am flattered.

And to be absolutely clear - kittenburger knows nothing about me. I guess she is free to speculate, and ponder things out, sure, be the whole arm-chair-psychologist thing, I like to do that myself. My point is, if she claims to know any deep dark secret or whatever, just know that she does not know anything more than you do. If you wanna know more about me, Google me.

Just the fact that burger went to the lengths of actually instigating through PM says a lot about how far she is willing to go, just to "be right".
So, again, I am supposed to... what... ignore her PM-ing someone in private, to stir shit up?
How exactly do I ignore that, if I don't even know it's happening?

That's a question directed at you, Hyke. If "silent treatment" is the way to make this calm down, how do I practically employ this method, if it has absolutely no discernible effect? If nothing stops burger from just PMing you?

Oh, and kittenburger, here's tip #43 for you: I don't PM people about you, you know why? Cus I talk about you while you're here, so you can hear what I say. Also, because I look like less of a sneak shit weasel, by not sneaking around, like a little hobby manipulator. Amateur.
Title: Re: Al, Zegh and Kittenburger, I'm challenging the three of you.
Post by: Bastet on February 27, 2016, 12:46:07 PM
And lol @ being the subject of PMs. I definitely am flattered.

And to be absolutely clear - kittenburger knows nothing about me. I guess she is free to speculate, and ponder things out, sure, be the whole arm-chair-psychologist thing, I like to do that myself. My point is, if she claims to know any deep dark secret or whatever, just know that she does not know anything more than you do. If you wanna know more about me, Google me.

Just the fact that burger went to the lengths of actually instigating through PM says a lot about how far she is willing to go, just to "be right".
So, again, I am supposed to... what... ignore her PM-ing someone in private, to stir shit up?
How exactly do I ignore that, if I don't even know it's happening?

That's a question directed at you, Hyke. If "silent treatment" is the way to make this calm down, how do I practically employ this method, if it has absolutely no discernible effect? If nothing stops burger from just PMing you?

Oh, and kittenburger, here's tip #43 for you: I don't PM people about you, you know why? Cus I talk about you while you're here, so you can hear what I say. Also, because I look like less of a sneak shit weasel, by not sneaking around, like a little hobby manipulator. Amateur.


I've even openly stated when I've pmed al what I've said out here. Too lazy to find it and post it here in callout. It's no secret. I didn't start pming until I saw the bullshit with you and butterflies and she posted the teletubby on gopher Gary because she's too much of a coward to post it as herself.   


With hykes she didn't read what I said at all or missed it so I said it again in pm.
Title: Re: Al, Zegh and Kittenburger, I'm challenging the three of you.
Post by: Al Swearegen on February 27, 2016, 03:45:56 PM
And lol @ being the subject of PMs. I definitely am flattered.

And to be absolutely clear - kittenburger knows nothing about me. I guess she is free to speculate, and ponder things out, sure, be the whole arm-chair-psychologist thing, I like to do that myself. My point is, if she claims to know any deep dark secret or whatever, just know that she does not know anything more than you do. If you wanna know more about me, Google me.

Just the fact that burger went to the lengths of actually instigating through PM says a lot about how far she is willing to go, just to "be right".
So, again, I am supposed to... what... ignore her PM-ing someone in private, to stir shit up?
How exactly do I ignore that, if I don't even know it's happening?

That's a question directed at you, Hyke. If "silent treatment" is the way to make this calm down, how do I practically employ this method, if it has absolutely no discernible effect? If nothing stops burger from just PMing you?

Oh, and kittenburger, here's tip #43 for you: I don't PM people about you, you know why? Cus I talk about you while you're here, so you can hear what I say. Also, because I look like less of a sneak shit weasel, by not sneaking around, like a little hobby manipulator. Amateur.

This still going?
Lots of words there Zegh. Write as much as you like, you will not be able to re-write people's perceptions.
You like to come across as the victim in all this. Subject to forces he has no control in and nor complicit in anything.
But you know what you look like? You look like a holier than thou, smarmy, up himself, entitled douchebags, with no self control and no sense of responsibility.
Probably exactly the type of person that sits at home all day on welfare smoking dope, drawing dinosaurs and yet somehow having the unmitigated audacity to imagine himself superior to and to talk down to people who are productive - working to support themselves, raising families, caring for loved ones, studying to better themselves and struggling to get by.
But that is not all you look like. You also look like that schoolgirl bully that starts shit and needles for reaction and when he gets that reaction acts incredulous and victimised.

"I did not do anything and see what they did. I am always perfectly behaved and so much better than they are yet they attack me so cruelly, whatever can I do. Please take my side in this"

It's weak, disingenuous and pathetic.  It's also not fooling anyone. Not now.

What about me? What about me? I'm an Arsehole. I do not have the same pretensions.  Everyone here knows that I am an Arsehole. I always have been. But they know I am honest, transparent and consistent.  Everything I do I own. I am more than willing to defend myself and my actions at length and in more words than most care to read.

You like to imagine you are better? No you are rolling in the muck with me, you just like to pretend you don't enjoy it.

Moral of the story here Zegh, every action and behaviour has a reaction. You do not control that reaction. The reaction you get doesn't have to be measured, or reasonable or adhere to any boundary or you imagine it should have. If all you did was poke a bear with a stick and he mauls you to death, YOU ought not have poked him with a stick. The moment before he gets into the mauling, and let's off a roar. You do not get to say "Okay bear, that's quite enough. By my accounting I poked you and you roared and frightened me  so we are by any reasonable measure even"

Take responsibility and recognise that you own your reactions however much you may dislike the form, degree or over what time they come.

Zegh you are my new special interest. Enjoy.
Title: Re: Al, Zegh and Kittenburger, I'm challenging the three of you.
Post by: ZEGH8578 on February 27, 2016, 06:48:35 PM
that was
1. kinda creepy, and
2. very telling, of what you think of yourself.

"moral of the story"? You sound like a movie bad guy, and the only people in real life who talk like that, are crazy-people. Nobody goes around teaching people "morals of stories", listen to yourself, you think you are a bear!?
You actually think BEARS go around posting cat-pictures on an autism-forum? You are NOT a bear, Al. You are not "Al" from that TV-series, you're not even that actor! That actor, who is a sing-and-dance guy, like most actors, and not an actual cowboy

You exempt yourself from all responsability by saying "I'm an arsehole, everybody knows that."

What comes out from this is that YOU are a man who still does not know how to take responsability, without always pointing to "yuk yuk that's just who I am!", and secondly - you take pride in this, like a teen boy who still never quite stopped rebelling against his parents.

I don't have to adhere to you, I've said it a thousand times, and YOU - now this is where you should pay attention - YOU don't HAVE to OBEY ME, if you don't want to.
However, IF you want to, then GO AHEAD - keep obsessing, all you want. You are an adult, aren't you? You do what you want, right? Who's stopping you? Idiot.
Title: Re: Al, Zegh and Kittenburger, I'm challenging the three of you.
Post by: Al Swearegen on February 27, 2016, 08:08:55 PM
that was
1. kinda creepy, and
2. very telling, of what you think of yourself.

"moral of the story"? You sound like a movie bad guy, and the only people in real life who talk like that, are crazy-people. Nobody goes around teaching people "morals of stories", listen to yourself, you think you are a bear!?
You actually think BEARS go around posting cat-pictures on an autism-forum? You are NOT a bear, Al. You are not "Al" from that TV-series, you're not even that actor! That actor, who is a sing-and-dance guy, like most actors, and not an actual cowboy

You exempt yourself from all responsability by saying "I'm an arsehole, everybody knows that."

What comes out from this is that YOU are a man who still does not know how to take responsability, without always pointing to "yuk yuk that's just who I am!", and secondly - you take pride in this, like a teen boy who still never quite stopped rebelling against his parents.

I don't have to adhere to you, I've said it a thousand times, and YOU - now this is where you should pay attention - YOU don't HAVE to OBEY ME, if you don't want to.
However, IF you want to, then GO AHEAD - keep obsessing, all you want. You are an adult, aren't you? You do what you want, right? Who's stopping you? Idiot.

Is it worth reading, Zegh?
I have a fair idea it will be something along the lines of

"Haha fuck you, you loser. You are such a loser I can't even...lol.
I so control your every thought and action.
Blah, blah, blah.
I am so much more than what you painted me as and you are so much worse.
Fuck you Al"

Okay look likes there ought to have been a lot more "blah". What I can also say without a sliver of doubt is that at no point did you accept any part you play in the things you do. Nor would you have understood my analogy. At no point you would show an appreciation for cause and effect. There may have been some measure of hypocrisy, projection and maybe a few barbs at Kittenburger. Maybe you even bring up the fact that I am no longer married as a barb. But you would not bust out of that shell of entitlement to be accountable.

You know I am tempted to look read it if only to see if you were ridiculous enough to say "Bears? There are no bears on I2!" I will spare myself the cringe of reading what you wrote. It won't stop others and I am sure if I am THAT far off the track, it will come up in conversation at some point. I can "bear" being wrong.
Title: Re: Al, Zegh and Kittenburger, I'm challenging the three of you.
Post by: Bastet on February 27, 2016, 08:22:12 PM
(http://i1376.photobucket.com/albums/ah5/Poogodandprinceofdarkness/Mobile%20Uploads/image_zps3vnopuw2.jpeg)
Title: Re: Al, Zegh and Kittenburger, I'm challenging the three of you.
Post by: RageBeoulve on February 27, 2016, 09:03:50 PM
https://youtu.be/Sagg08DrO5U
Title: Re: Al, Zegh and Kittenburger, I'm challenging the three of you.
Post by: Al Swearegen on February 27, 2016, 09:24:38 PM
https://youtu.be/Sagg08DrO5U

http://www.intensitysquared.com/index.php/topic,23531.0.html

Fuck's sake
Title: Re: Al, Zegh and Kittenburger, I'm challenging the three of you.
Post by: RageBeoulve on February 27, 2016, 10:06:00 PM
HAHAHA  :viking:
Title: Re: Al, Zegh and Kittenburger, I'm challenging the three of you.
Post by: Bastet on February 27, 2016, 10:33:15 PM
Zegh likes to attack others to puff himself up. He's a hypocrite. He needs to hold himself to the same standard he holds others to.
Title: Re: Al, Zegh and Kittenburger, I'm challenging the three of you.
Post by: Al Swearegen on February 28, 2016, 01:02:10 AM
Zegh likes to attack others to puff himself up. He's a hypocrite. He needs to hold himself to the same standard he holds others to.

Agreed. It is entitlement. As adults we take on and demonstrate the responsibilities we learn as children
 If you look at the adults on this board you see that they do this and are trying actively to shape their lives. Studying, working, caring for loved ones, raising families, etc.
Zegh? Collects a welfare cheque, smokes dope, draws dinosaurs......AND admonishes other adults on here for being immature or irresponsible or less than he.
You see the disconnect and hypocrisy. He is made to laugh at.
Title: Re: Al, Zegh and Kittenburger, I'm challenging the three of you.
Post by: Bastet on February 28, 2016, 01:04:24 AM
Zegh likes to attack others to puff himself up. He's a hypocrite. He needs to hold himself to the same standard he holds others to.

Agreed. It is entitlement. As adults we take on and demonstrate the responsibilities we learn as children
 If you look at the adults on this board you see that they do this and are trying actively to shape their lives. Studying, working, caring for loved ones, raising families, etc.
Zegh? Collects a welfare cheque, smokes dope, draws dinosaurs......AND admonishes other adults on here for being immature or irresponsible or less than he.
You see the disconnect and hypocrisy. He is made to laugh at.

He acts like a social justice warrior Millenial moron
Title: Re: Al, Zegh and Kittenburger, I'm challenging the three of you.
Post by: Al Swearegen on February 28, 2016, 01:27:36 AM
Zegh likes to attack others to puff himself up. He's a hypocrite. He needs to hold himself to the same standard he holds others to.

Agreed. It is entitlement. As adults we take on and demonstrate the responsibilities we learn as children
 If you look at the adults on this board you see that they do this and are trying actively to shape their lives. Studying, working, caring for loved ones, raising families, etc.
Zegh? Collects a welfare cheque, smokes dope, draws dinosaurs......AND admonishes other adults on here for being immature or irresponsible or less than he.
You see the disconnect and hypocrisy. He is made to laugh at.

He acts like a social justice warrior Millenial moron

Not a stretch at all.
"Progressive" values, "Me" Generation backed with an entitled mentality, and an overly inflated ego at odds with his actual worth. 
Does draw good dinosaurs though. Lots of practice in the downtimes when he wasn't being productive.
Title: Re: Al, Zegh and Kittenburger, I'm challenging the three of you.
Post by: Al Swearegen on February 28, 2016, 01:40:18 AM
I got warned to stay clear of you, because you apparently are a really horrible man, and I would regret it to my dying day if I stayed in contact with you.

I did not see this on Friday night. I laughed. I AM a horrible man.  >:D

No wonder I was not privvy to these things.

I was a disposable guard dog to many on AFF but not everyone.
Title: Re: Al, Zegh and Kittenburger, I'm challenging the three of you.
Post by: ZEGH8578 on February 28, 2016, 12:29:02 PM
You two should keep flirting, mr and mrs butthurt.
More fuel for the fire:
Burger, you are still an idiot. Do you walk slowly?

Al, I don't even know where to begin with you, anymore. You have been dealing with self-delusion so long, you no longer know how to tell reality and fiction apart. You actually think of yourself as a bear. Have you ever tried comparing?
1. You often talk about yourself, "I always [bla bla]" <---insecurity, you need to emphasize who you are, because you just being yourself won't do. I don.t.
2. You quickly grasp for allies, "Yes! Zegh is indeed annoying!" <---insecurity, you are desperate for allies to aid you, and incapable of fending for yourself. I don't
3. You constantly angrandize yourself, "I'm a sleeping bear!" "I'm like that dude in the tv show - yes, the hardest, toughest one of them all!" "University of writing!" "Million dollar project!" <---this is serious crazy-man territory. If I cared about you at all, I'd tell you to cool it, because the insanity shows with statements like that, but I don't care, so, go ahead - make more insane little utterings, they can be entertaining whenever they're not mildly creepy!
4. Your conviction comes from emotional pressure, not legitimate interest. You therefore adhere to teams, one opposing another. You've never had a good understanding of the process behind knowledge, or the language used in science, so you just resort to - not even politician style rethorics, but teen-troll style rethorics.
Title: Re: Al, Zegh and Kittenburger, I'm challenging the three of you.
Post by: Al Swearegen on February 28, 2016, 03:15:00 PM
You two should keep flirting, mr and mrs butthurt.
More fuel for the fire:
Burger, you are still an idiot. Do you walk slowly?

Al, I don't even know where to begin with you, anymore. You have been dealing with self-delusion so long, you no longer know how to tell reality and fiction apart. You actually think of yourself as a bear. Have you ever tried comparing?
1. You often talk about yourself, "I always [bla bla]" <---insecurity, you need to emphasize who you are, because you just being yourself won't do. I don.t.
2. You quickly grasp for allies, "Yes! Zegh is indeed annoying!" <---insecurity, you are desperate for allies to aid you, and incapable of fending for yourself. I don't
3. You constantly angrandize yourself, "I'm a sleeping bear!" "I'm like that dude in the tv show - yes, the hardest, toughest one of them all!" "University of writing!" "Million dollar project!" <---this is serious crazy-man territory. If I cared about you at all, I'd tell you to cool it, because the insanity shows with statements like that, but I don't care, so, go ahead - make more insane little utterings, they can be entertaining whenever they're not mildly creepy!
4. Your conviction comes from emotional pressure, not legitimate interest. You therefore adhere to teams, one opposing another. You've never had a good understanding of the process behind knowledge, or the language used in science, so you just resort to - not even politician style rethorics, but teen-troll style rethorics.

It's funny, there was a time you used to make fun of the length of my replies. I am going to presume what you write, at this point is meaningless twaddle.

Where are you actually gonna go?
Are you going to :c
Call me old?
Say I'm pathetic?
Immature?
Say I can't argue?
Make fun of me being a divorcee?
Perhaps you will go lower and attack my relationship with my children?
Perhaps you will pretend me and Kittenburger are an item?
Perhaps you will say I'm stupid or mentally ill or "so Autistic"
Perhaps you will say my photos are ugly?
Perhaps you will say I am not my avatar or not a Pussycat of the aspie Elite?
Perhaps you are down to wilfully taking things out of context to try to make a point or perhaps you simply make shit up to strawman me?

Have fun with that. I can spare myself the labour.

Your credibility has been torpedoed.  You are rolling in the muck with me. Not point pretending that you are not just as dirty. Own your own actions. Be responsible.  Be a man.

I owe you a Ninja cat picture
Title: Re: Al, Zegh and Kittenburger, I'm challenging the three of you.
Post by: 'andersom' on February 28, 2016, 03:19:06 PM
That's a question directed at you, Hyke. If "silent treatment" is the way to make this calm down, how do I practically employ this method, if it has absolutely no discernible effect? If nothing stops burger from just PMing you?

There is not a clear answer Zegh.

I only know that if no one changes habits, nothing will change in a "stable" setting. Seems like you and Al and Kittenburger have found a "stable" setting. And since neither you, Al or Kittenburger will change things, nothing will change for a long time.

So be it it's up to the three of you. Both you and Al said earlier in this thread you were not going to change habits.

So, what more do I have to say to you about this? Nothing as far as I get it. 
Title: Re: Al, Zegh and Kittenburger, I'm challenging the three of you.
Post by: 'andersom' on February 28, 2016, 03:25:18 PM
I've even openly stated when I've pmed al what I've said out here. Too lazy to find it and post it here in callout. It's no secret. I didn't start pming until I saw the bullshit with you and butterflies and she posted the teletubby on gopher Gary because she's too much of a coward to post it as herself.   


With hykes she didn't read what I said at all or missed it so I said it again in pm.

I've never seen the fricking Teletubby. I'm not always online. And there are whole chunks in threads I skip, because they seem to be boring.

And I still don't get why you think it is important to PM me about it. Let alone PM me that the IP of one of the community sockpuppet incarnations was located in Hungary.
Why do you need to follow an IP on this site? And why should I or anyone outside staff know about the location of an IP?
Title: Re: Al, Zegh and Kittenburger, I'm challenging the three of you.
Post by: lutra on February 28, 2016, 03:39:53 PM
Why the fuck give DFG/KittenBurger any attention, I'm wondering. Screwed up and quite sad she is, not?

She pm-ed me a couple of times too. She's pathetic.
Title: Re: Al, Zegh and Kittenburger, I'm challenging the three of you.
Post by: Bastet on February 28, 2016, 05:19:05 PM
Why the fuck give DFG/KittenBurger any attention, I'm wondering. Screwed up and quite sad she is, not?

She pm-ed me a couple of times too. She's pathetic.

Say the tard who snipes ppl on shout box. Don't you have women to stalk? How many years ago did I pm you lutrash? 2013 Amirite?


GTFO callout


Look who wants attention for himself, hypocrite.

     
Title: Re: Al, Zegh and Kittenburger, I'm challenging the three of you.
Post by: Bastet on February 28, 2016, 05:41:42 PM
I've even openly stated when I've pmed al what I've said out here. Too lazy to find it and post it here in callout. It's no secret. I didn't start pming until I saw the bullshit with you and butterflies and she posted the teletubby on gopher Gary because she's too much of a coward to post it as herself.   


With hykes she didn't read what I said at all or missed it so I said it again in pm.

I've never seen the fricking Teletubby. I'm not always online. And there are whole chunks in threads I skip, because they seem to be boring.

And I still don't get why you think it is important to PM me about it. Let alone PM me that the IP of one of the community sockpuppet incarnations was located in Hungary.
Why do you need to follow an IP on this site? And why should I or anyone outside staff know about the location of an IP?
Intuition told me it was Butterflies that posted it. Out of curiosity I checked the ip and I was right. She lives in Hungary. I told you directly via pm because it was clear you didn't see what was going on. It's all been out there in plain sight.
Title: Re: Al, Zegh and Kittenburger, I'm challenging the three of you.
Post by: 'andersom' on February 28, 2016, 05:50:21 PM
I've even openly stated when I've pmed al what I've said out here. Too lazy to find it and post it here in callout. It's no secret. I didn't start pming until I saw the bullshit with you and butterflies and she posted the teletubby on gopher Gary because she's too much of a coward to post it as herself.   


With hykes she didn't read what I said at all or missed it so I said it again in pm.

I've never seen the fricking Teletubby. I'm not always online. And there are whole chunks in threads I skip, because they seem to be boring.

And I still don't get why you think it is important to PM me about it. Let alone PM me that the IP of one of the community sockpuppet incarnations was located in Hungary.
Why do you need to follow an IP on this site? And why should I or anyone outside staff know about the location of an IP?
Intuition told me it was Butterflies that posted it. Out of curiosity I checked the ip and I was right. She lives in Hungary. I told you directly via pm because it was clear you didn't see what was going on. It's all been out there in plain sight.

I have no idea what to answer to this.

So, I guess the call-out/challenge is over now.

Zegh and AL made their points clear, and I have no idea how to answer you.






If it is up to me, this thing is over.
Title: Re: Al, Zegh and Kittenburger, I'm challenging the three of you.
Post by: Bastet on February 28, 2016, 05:50:59 PM
You two should keep flirting, mr and mrs butthurt.
More fuel for the fire:
Burger, you are still an idiot. Do you walk slowly?

Al, I don't even know where to begin with you, anymore. You have been dealing with self-delusion so long, you no longer know how to tell reality and fiction apart. You actually think of yourself as a bear. Have you ever tried comparing?
1. You often talk about yourself, "I always [bla bla]" <---insecurity, you need to emphasize who you are, because you just being yourself won't do. I don.t.
2. You quickly grasp for allies, "Yes! Zegh is indeed annoying!" <---insecurity, you are desperate for allies to aid you, and incapable of fending for yourself. I don't
3. You constantly angrandize yourself, "I'm a sleeping bear!" "I'm like that dude in the tv show - yes, the hardest, toughest one of them all!" "University of writing!" "Million dollar project!" <---this is serious crazy-man territory. If I cared about you at all, I'd tell you to cool it, because the insanity shows with statements like that, but I don't care, so, go ahead - make more insane little utterings, they can be entertaining whenever they're not mildly creepy!
4. Your conviction comes from emotional pressure, not legitimate interest. You therefore adhere to teams, one opposing another. You've never had a good understanding of the process behind knowledge, or the language used in science, so you just resort to - not even politician style rethorics, but teen-troll style rethorics.


You're like a piñata.
Title: Re: Al, Zegh and Kittenburger, I'm challenging the three of you.
Post by: Bastet on February 28, 2016, 05:55:14 PM
I've even openly stated when I've pmed al what I've said out here. Too lazy to find it and post it here in callout. It's no secret. I didn't start pming until I saw the bullshit with you and butterflies and she posted the teletubby on gopher Gary because she's too much of a coward to post it as herself.   


With hykes she didn't read what I said at all or missed it so I said it again in pm.

I've never seen the fricking Teletubby. I'm not always online. And there are whole chunks in threads I skip, because they seem to be boring.

And I still don't get why you think it is important to PM me about it. Let alone PM me that the IP of one of the community sockpuppet incarnations was located in Hungary.
Why do you need to follow an IP on this site? And why should I or anyone outside staff know about the location of an IP?
Intuition told me it was Butterflies that posted it. Out of curiosity I checked the ip and I was right. She lives in Hungary. I told you directly via pm because it was clear you didn't see what was going on. It's all been out there in plain sight.

I have no idea what to answer to this.

So, I guess the call-out/challenge is over now.

Zegh and AL made their points clear, and I have no idea how to answer you.






If it is up to me, this thing is over.


I can't go on my laptop until I can install a proper firewall. I hate posting on my phone. The thing is I have much more to say. But really I want a larger screen and Microsoft word to help with the editing.
Title: Re: Al, Zegh and Kittenburger, I'm challenging the three of you.
Post by: ZEGH8578 on February 28, 2016, 06:55:42 PM
wth :D
Title: Re: Al, Zegh and Kittenburger, I'm challenging the three of you.
Post by: Bastet on February 28, 2016, 07:02:34 PM
wth :D

Good boy
Title: Re: Al, Zegh and Kittenburger, I'm challenging the three of you.
Post by: 'andersom' on February 29, 2016, 03:00:06 AM

I can't go on my laptop until I can install a proper firewall. I hate posting on my phone. The thing is I have much more to say. But really I want a larger screen and Microsoft word to help with the editing.

Will it explain why stuff is such SERIOUS BUSINESS that you have to even track IPs?

Will see.
Title: Re: Al, Zegh and Kittenburger, I'm challenging the three of you.
Post by: Al Swearegen on February 29, 2016, 03:57:37 AM
wth :D

(https://s-media-cache-ak0.pinimg.com/236x/0e/10/1c/0e101cd329543844351bbfce4c78ddc1.jpg)

Camouflage and Concealment are essential for Ninja Cat, but not easily learned
Title: Re: Al, Zegh and Kittenburger, I'm challenging the three of you.
Post by: "couldbecousin" on February 29, 2016, 06:24:11 AM
wth :D

(https://s-media-cache-ak0.pinimg.com/236x/0e/10/1c/0e101cd329543844351bbfce4c78ddc1.jpg)

Camouflage and Concealment are essential for Ninja Cat, but not easily learned

     Fixed your link.  :ninja:
Title: Re: Al, Zegh and Kittenburger, I'm challenging the three of you.
Post by: Al Swearegen on February 29, 2016, 06:31:16 AM
wth :D

(https://s-media-cache-ak0.pinimg.com/236x/0e/10/1c/0e101cd329543844351bbfce4c78ddc1.jpg)

Camouflage and Concealment are essential for Ninja Cat, but not easily learned

     Fixed your link.  :ninja:

Thank you....and in doing so, unlocked the secret of the ninja cat trainee.




Hang on.......you're in the callout!
Title: Re: Al, Zegh and Kittenburger, I'm challenging the three of you.
Post by: "couldbecousin" on February 29, 2016, 06:32:49 AM
  *wobbles out of the callout*


:cbc:
Title: Re: Al, Zegh and Kittenburger, I'm challenging the three of you.
Post by: Al Swearegen on February 29, 2016, 08:15:50 AM
I'm bored by it too, but I allready tried the "ignore it, maybe it'll stop" approach for a whole, maybe two weeks.
That was slightly more boring, cus I couldn't even have some fun retorting. I so love resorting to ad hominems, whenever I can. They are getting a lot of bad rep lately.

I got this from the Peanut Gallery. Whatever you are up to, it won't work you know.
* If you are are trying to garner sympathy, that will not work.
* If you are trying to divorce yourself from being a party to these proceedings and this situation, that won't work.
* If you are trying to laugh about it, neither will that go down well.

They see you as no better than me and visa versa. To them we are equally as responsible for this....and they are right.

(https://cdn-webimages.wimages.net/0510bf30b661bd6101730751c4b2899bcd9642-wm.jpg)

So out of curiosity, how do you imagine YOU will finish this? You started things and so what was the big plan? Are you moaning about in the Peanut Gallery?

"I am not part of this and I don't want to be. I just want to start shit and have others end it at a time and place convenient to me, and when I have had enough....and be seen as reasonable."
Something like that? Its pretty weak if that is the case. Pretty infantile.

Why not own your behaviour? You started shit and now it is up to you to finish it. Eight months now. You are at LEAST half the problem and have at least half the responsibility.

I am having a decent enough time. I don't mind stirring you up. I didn't start shit but I don't care that I am involved. I fully admit and accept every crap thing I say and will own it. I defend any misunderstanding and admit any shitty behaviour. But then when have I complained? If people dislike that, I am okay with that. I own the outcomes of my behaviour.

What about you? You simply whine and play victim. Because you do this, nothing changes. I am okay with that, but I suspect you aren't. So what are you gonna do about it? Don't know? Hilarious.
Title: Re: Al, Zegh and Kittenburger, I'm challenging the three of you.
Post by: Bastet on February 29, 2016, 09:26:23 AM

I can't go on my laptop until I can install a proper firewall. I hate posting on my phone. The thing is I have much more to say. But really I want a larger screen and Microsoft word to help with the editing.

Will it explain why stuff is such SERIOUS BUSINESS that you have to even track IPs?

Will see.


I was curious to see if I was right. I was. I'm psychic I wanted to see how spot on my intuition was. Just like my intuition with Zegh. I see through his bullshit. He's lying.
Title: Re: Al, Zegh and Kittenburger, I'm challenging the three of you.
Post by: ZEGH8578 on February 29, 2016, 10:38:21 AM
I'm psychic

The plot thickens
Title: Re: Al, Zegh and Kittenburger, I'm challenging the three of you.
Post by: 'andersom' on February 29, 2016, 12:12:38 PM

I can't go on my laptop until I can install a proper firewall. I hate posting on my phone. The thing is I have much more to say. But really I want a larger screen and Microsoft word to help with the editing.

Will it explain why stuff is such SERIOUS BUSINESS that you have to even track IPs?

Will see.


I was curious to see if I was right. I was. I'm psychic I wanted to see how spot on my intuition was. Just like my intuition with Zegh. I see through his bullshit. He's lying.

Why the need to share the location of the IP with me.

I find it weird and a bit worrying that you have the need to check an IP. But that after that you have to share it too makes it really awkward.

Style and content often tell enough about who is who. Sometimes it takes a while, Hubert was a master in going unnoticed for most members for a long long time. But most of the times it is visible very quickly.
Title: Re: Al, Zegh and Kittenburger, I'm challenging the three of you.
Post by: Bastet on February 29, 2016, 12:56:06 PM

I can't go on my laptop until I can install a proper firewall. I hate posting on my phone. The thing is I have much more to say. But really I want a larger screen and Microsoft word to help with the editing.

Will it explain why stuff is such SERIOUS BUSINESS that you have to even track IPs?

Will see.


I was curious to see if I was right. I was. I'm psychic I wanted to see how spot on my intuition was. Just like my intuition with Zegh. I see through his bullshit. He's lying.

Why the need to share the location of the IP with me.

I find it weird and a bit worrying that you have the need to check an IP. But that after that you have to share it too makes it really awkward.

Style and content often tell enough about who is who. Sometimes it takes a while, Hubert was a master in going unnoticed for most members for a long long time. But most of the times it is visible very quickly.

I already told you why. Do I need to repost that again for you?

I was pointing out the bullshit going on but obviously you don't care. Why even start this callout if you don't care? I'm going to keep having fun with Zegh and he'll keep responding because he's too cocky too ignore me.
Title: Re: Al, Zegh and Kittenburger, I'm challenging the three of you.
Post by: ZEGH8578 on February 29, 2016, 01:04:28 PM
And because you are psychic
Title: Re: Al, Zegh and Kittenburger, I'm challenging the three of you.
Post by: 'andersom' on February 29, 2016, 01:56:04 PM

I can't go on my laptop until I can install a proper firewall. I hate posting on my phone. The thing is I have much more to say. But really I want a larger screen and Microsoft word to help with the editing.

Will it explain why stuff is such SERIOUS BUSINESS that you have to even track IPs?

Will see.


I was curious to see if I was right. I was. I'm psychic I wanted to see how spot on my intuition was. Just like my intuition with Zegh. I see through his bullshit. He's lying.

Why the need to share the location of the IP with me.

I find it weird and a bit worrying that you have the need to check an IP. But that after that you have to share it too makes it really awkward.

Style and content often tell enough about who is who. Sometimes it takes a while, Hubert was a master in going unnoticed for most members for a long long time. But most of the times it is visible very quickly.

I already told you why. Do I need to repost that again for you?

I was pointing out the bullshit going on but obviously you don't care. Why even start this callout if you don't care? I'm going to keep having fun with Zegh and he'll keep responding because he's too cocky too ignore me.

I did not make this challenge to find out who is a liar or saint. I am just bored with this shit going on for so long and so extended. Everywhere on the board. (Yes, Al, I know it is only a small percentage, but it is like boils, even if they cover only a percent of your body, you can think they are a bloody nuisance) I am bored with it. So I challenged the three of you.

That's what my challenge is about. And that is what will not change apparently. Well so be it. I2 survived things like this before, but that was when the board was way more active and there were plenty of threads where tedious never ending stale drama was not around.

The problems the three of you have are things the three of you should sort out. Not my business.  I was not aiming for the ultimate truth or something like that.

If crimes have been committed, or if you think your privacy has been tampered with, you can report posts. Staff can deal with that.
Title: Re: Al, Zegh and Kittenburger, I'm challenging the three of you.
Post by: Bastet on February 29, 2016, 02:08:00 PM
And because you are psychic

 :eyelash:
Title: Re: Al, Zegh and Kittenburger, I'm challenging the three of you.
Post by: Al Swearegen on February 29, 2016, 03:35:09 PM

I can't go on my laptop until I can install a proper firewall. I hate posting on my phone. The thing is I have much more to say. But really I want a larger screen and Microsoft word to help with the editing.

Will it explain why stuff is such SERIOUS BUSINESS that you have to even track IPs?

Will see.


I was curious to see if I was right. I was. I'm psychic I wanted to see how spot on my intuition was. Just like my intuition with Zegh. I see through his bullshit. He's lying.

Why the need to share the location of the IP with me.

I find it weird and a bit worrying that you have the need to check an IP. But that after that you have to share it too makes it really awkward.

Style and content often tell enough about who is who. Sometimes it takes a while, Hubert was a master in going unnoticed for most members for a long long time. But most of the times it is visible very quickly.

I already told you why. Do I need to repost that again for you?

I was pointing out the bullshit going on but obviously you don't care. Why even start this callout if you don't care? I'm going to keep having fun with Zegh and he'll keep responding because he's too cocky too ignore me.

I did not make this challenge to find out who is a liar or saint. I am just bored with this shit going on for so long and so extended. Everywhere on the board. (Yes, Al, I know it is only a small percentage, but it is like boils, even if they cover only a percent of your body, you can think they are a bloody nuisance) I am bored with it. So I challenged the three of you.

That's what my challenge is about. And that is what will not change apparently. Well so be it. I2 survived things like this before, but that was when the board was way more active and there were plenty of threads where tedious never ending stale drama was not around.

The problems the three of you have are things the three of you should sort out. Not my business.  I was not aiming for the ultimate truth or something like that.

If crimes have been committed, or if you think your privacy has been tampered with, you can report posts. Staff can deal with that.

Fair point.

I don't think it was a particularly good idea, when Zegh started his crap those many months ago. Nor to escalate. Had anyone have asked, I'd have said it was a bad idea and the wrong way to go about things.

But that is okay he chose and he is an adult. He got my attention and my interest. He then found he could not put the Genie back in the bottle (Zegh no doubt will misread this and think I am referring to myself in this analogy as a Genie....because he is a dumb motherfucker).

Finding it goes on a bit longer than he thought and no longer fun, he tries to:
Shame
Attack
Make assorted dares.

Unsurprisingly none of this works. He ignores it for a short time. That doesn't work. Now he is crying in the Peanut Gallery and trying to minimise his part in things.

None of these methods of dealing with things under most circumstances would be considered good ways to go about things. In fact it is bad method on bad method and a total obliviousness as to how he got here or the role he had in things.

Me? I don't care so much. I find it incredulous for any man to start shit and then cry when the retaliation was not in the form, severity or duration as you would have liked. It does remind me somewhat of TCO'S inability to finish shit he started.

I am along for the ride. Zegh is 10 months in and no end in sight. You think he has it in him to be a man and take responsibility and finish and resolve what he started? I don't. 10 months later he is whining. This is what happens to people who have it too easy. Highly vaulted senses of superiority, entitlement and expectation that others will fix their issues.

He has not a clue what to do. It's embarrassing.

Title: Re: Al, Zegh and Kittenburger, I'm challenging the three of you.
Post by: Bastet on February 29, 2016, 03:53:42 PM

I can't go on my laptop until I can install a proper firewall. I hate posting on my phone. The thing is I have much more to say. But really I want a larger screen and Microsoft word to help with the editing.

Will it explain why stuff is such SERIOUS BUSINESS that you have to even track IPs?

Will see.


I was curious to see if I was right. I was. I'm psychic I wanted to see how spot on my intuition was. Just like my intuition with Zegh. I see through his bullshit. He's lying.

Why the need to share the location of the IP with me.

I find it weird and a bit worrying that you have the need to check an IP. But that after that you have to share it too makes it really awkward.

Style and content often tell enough about who is who. Sometimes it takes a while, Hubert was a master in going unnoticed for most members for a long long time. But most of the times it is visible very quickly.

I already told you why. Do I need to repost that again for you?

I was pointing out the bullshit going on but obviously you don't care. Why even start this callout if you don't care? I'm going to keep having fun with Zegh and he'll keep responding because he's too cocky too ignore me.

I did not make this challenge to find out who is a liar or saint. I am just bored with this shit going on for so long and so extended. Everywhere on the board. (Yes, Al, I know it is only a small percentage, but it is like boils, even if they cover only a percent of your body, you can think they are a bloody nuisance) I am bored with it. So I challenged the three of you.

That's what my challenge is about. And that is what will not change apparently. Well so be it. I2 survived things like this before, but that was when the board was way more active and there were plenty of threads where tedious never ending stale drama was not around.

The problems the three of you have are things the three of you should sort out. Not my business.  I was not aiming for the ultimate truth or something like that.

If crimes have been committed, or if you think your privacy has been tampered with, you can report posts. Staff can deal with that.

It won't ever be sorted out. Zegh is Zegh. He starts shit then lies about the circumstances. I'm content to pester him endlessly and he can't resist striking back. He'll never be a real man and own up to his own flaws. I'm no saint. I admit I'm childish and lazy and make little effort in how I post and will probably wont change that here, since I see no real point. I'm very OCD when it comes to lies and hypocrisy though. I've said that quite a few times here. He shouldn't start shit if he can't finish it, IMO.


Also he shouldn't throw bricks in glass houses in regards to attacking my appearance. Sounding like a middle school little girl. Sad.
Title: Re: Al, Zegh and Kittenburger, I'm challenging the three of you.
Post by: 'andersom' on March 01, 2016, 01:24:19 AM
So, all three of you are dedicated to go on.
I have failed in challenging you effectively.
The peanut gallery may hand out the winners cake to the three of you.


Title: Re: Al, Zegh and Kittenburger, I'm challenging the three of you.
Post by: Al Swearegen on March 01, 2016, 05:31:54 AM
So, all three of you are dedicated to go on.
I have failed in challenging you effectively.
The peanut gallery may hand out the winners cake to the three of you.

Not so sure you are right about that.
Zegh is giving mixed messages. THAT much I have gleaned from what you and others have said (but I don't care to read him myself). On one hand he does not want to be associated with the feuding. He certainly does not want to be seen as in any way responsible for it and especially after 10 months.
But on the other hand, as much as he dislikes it, he reacts on it again and again. He doesn't want it and wants it to end and yet his efforts to resolve it are far from good as I pointed out. 

He has not a clue what to do. It's embarrassing.
Not really sure what he should do either. He seemed to take responsibility for starting it on the first page of the callout, though haven't gotten the impression anyone involved is interested in an end. Not sure what would make it end.

Well Jack, would you ever imagine yourself in this position? Having thrown bad tactic after worse over 10 months and finding yourself stuck in a crappy situation you could not get out of? What might you do in that case? Try shaming the person? Insulting them? Cry at other members in the from? Dare them to do things to prove...whatever?

You know as well as I that none of these things is likely to resolve anything. Ignoring it? Better....if it goes away.

Now, IF these tactics do not work, is it a good idea to rinse and repeat again and again and expect a better result?

My questions are rhetorical because I know that you wouldn't. You are not a moronic stoner. In fact we had a run in (not one of my better moments) some years ago and we sorted things. In fact many of us have and sorted things. Hell, Bint and I sorted things out, and she accused me of incestuous pedophilia.

If people REALLY want to sort things they will manage.

Now as for me? I don't care. Honestly. I get a bit of a laugh stirring up Zegh. It makes me smile. If he finished what he started and conducted himself like a man, not a smarmy, obnoxious man-child, he may be worth reading and may be worth a modicum of respect. I may even go along with him. I don't mind either way. But I do not think the reactions of others on here will sway me one way or another.

This is of course a great opportunity to see if Zegh is full of bullshit when he has been moaning about wanting it to end and not having any ability to stop it. Or whether he will put on his big boy pants and get on with it.

I am not going to hold his hand with this. I would much prefer seeing him prove he was never about fixing things and squander the last of his trust and credibility and failing that I would love the opportunity to see him flail around in the dark trying to resolve things.


One last thing, I think Kittenburger you misread Hyke. You care too much too, if she likes Zegh. Most here do. He is my humble opinion a waste of oxygen but not everyone will share my wholesome opinion of him. Hyke is not picking sides on this one and she doesn't need to. She thinks we are all equally being dickheads and I am 90% sure that opinion is shared by 90% of the people on the forum. I do like Hyke.

I also think You, misrepresents Kittenburger's intentions Hyke. Kittenburger hold grudges and holds them deep enough to grow roots. She hates Zegh. She loathes him and the shit things he has said about her and still says. Kittenburger is obsessive and is sensitive. I say these things not as a good or a bad thing. It is just her. She would be the first to tell you that though. I reject that she is following me around. She certainly DOES agree with many of my contentions about Zegh and visa versa. These will be reflected in 1/7 threads I post in and likely to be over many posts in those threads. I like her. She is good value.

So unless anyone comments on or contends any of this, this will be my final bit on this thread.

Oh Zegh

(https://s-media-cache-ak0.pinimg.com/736x/5e/5c/04/5e5c040294d4a87dfa8a09c593d90c9e.jpg)
Title: Re: Al, Zegh and Kittenburger, I'm challenging the three of you.
Post by: ZEGH8578 on March 01, 2016, 07:51:02 AM
Stop being a child Al, and take some responsability.

Is this a "reaction"?

If so, does that compell you to keep going, indefinitely? Then you are a child.
All you do is revert to this "I'm just a troublemaker, I can't help it!"-crap. You can help it. We all can help how we behave. And you're not a "troublemaker" or a "badass" or a "bear" or a damn "genie" (stup using these angrandizing analogies. And see? You read my messages, all of them, which... I knew...  ::) )

I'm going to go a little further, and give Hyke 1 of my months to try "silent treatment" again. I will respond to normal communication, but not to "cat memes" or any other "provocative" bullshit.
One month, starting now.
Title: Re: Al, Zegh and Kittenburger, I'm challenging the three of you.
Post by: Bastet on March 01, 2016, 09:51:23 AM
Stop being a child Al, and take some responsability.

Is this a "reaction"?

If so, does that compell you to keep going, indefinitely? Then you are a child.
All you do is revert to this "I'm just a troublemaker, I can't help it!"-crap. You can help it. We all can help how we behave. And you're not a "troublemaker" or a "badass" or a "bear" or a damn "genie" (stup using these angrandizing analogies. And see? You read my messages, all of them, which... I knew...  ::) )

I'm going to go a little further, and givne Hyke 1 of my months to try "silent treatment" again. I will respond to normal communication, but not to "cat memes" or any other "provocative" bullshit.
One month, starting now.

[zeghing intensifies]

I don't recall you taking responsibility for your own childish behaviors. Yet you talk to others like your an adult and they're a child. You are delusional. Must be the weed giving you unwarranted self importance.
Title: Re: Al, Zegh and Kittenburger, I'm challenging the three of you.
Post by: Al Swearegen on March 01, 2016, 02:23:13 PM
Stop being a child Al, and take some responsability.

Is this a "reaction"?

If so, does that compell you to keep going, indefinitely? Then you are a child.
All you do is revert to this "I'm just a troublemaker, I can't help it!"-crap. You can help it. We all can help how we behave. And you're not a "troublemaker" or a "badass" or a "bear" or a damn "genie" (stup using these angrandizing analogies. And see? You read my messages, all of them, which... I knew...  ::) )

I'm going to go a little further, and givne Hyke 1 of my months to try "silent treatment" again. I will respond to normal communication, but not to "cat memes" or any other "provocative" bullshit.
One month, starting now.

[zeghing intensifies]

I don't recall you taking responsibility for your own childish behaviors. Yet you talk to others like your an adult and they're a child. You are delusional. Must be the weed giving you unwarranted self importance.

I decided to give him the benefit of the doubt. Given every opportunity to see what he did wrong and what had not worked, I may as well read his reply.

Bloody Hell.

Did I not tell him that the tactics he had used were bad tactics? Did I not make that abundantly clear? Did I not say that ignoring was only sighting better than the shaming, daring and insulting tactics and doesn't resolve anything but rather would only work if others move on? Didn't I say that doing rinse repeat of the same tactics he had used (ignoring was a previous tactics) will not work?

So what does he do?  :hahaha:

But that was not all. Was else did the smug condescending man-child say? Yup, I need to take responsibility. Well clearly I have the whole way through.  I have no issue with this. I happily own everything I said and my place in it.

Kittenburger,  you noticed (and I am sure anyone else reading did too) He did not take any responsibility. None. Effectively he says:

"I didn't do anything. I was not involved. I have no responsibility or accountability for my actions. But to" prove" my commitment to stopping it, I will try to use a tactic I previously used that was just denounced by one of the people I am feuding with. It did not work last time and I have been told explicitly that it won't this time, but I will use it again....and with righteous indignance and in a month' s time I will say "See!!" like a school child and you will all see how committed I was and how bad the others were"

This is virtue signalling. He is doing two things giving the pretence of wanting resolution by do something that appears that he is doing something constructive. But it has a nastier element to it which everyone should see. A petulant element.  Earlier Hyke suggested maybe ignoring Kittenburger and I. She set no timestamp for this ignoring tactic. So he will come in, ignore all other advice, set a timestamp, trial ignoring for a month and then when it doesn't work,  will petulant say "See, Hyke! You were wrong. I knew better. That tactic was your tactic and it doesn't work because nothing works and it's not my fault"

He is a man-child. It's not about fixing things. He is shifting blame. Hyke's fault because she gave bad advice, Al's responsibility because he will not finish what I started and allow me to not be accountable for my actions. It's Kittenburger's fault because she won't stop pointing out my shitty behaviours. The only person who isn't at fault is Zegh.

Oh he mentioned the Bear and the Genie, and his pea brain thought that in either of those analogies I was contextualising myself as the bear or the Genie.

The Genie for instance is the things carelessly said or doing, that causes havoc and becomes a bigger and bigger issue if uncontrolled. Therefore too difficult to control or contain back in the confines of the bottle. In this situation it makes the Genie, everything unconstructive thing you've said and your shit attitude about things to this point....not me.

As for the bear? You are an idiot. No worth explaining, you are still likely at the Genie example, trying to find a way that I was trying to make a point to me about me whilst speaking to you..  Because you are a dumb bastard.

So no surprises. I didn't expect much, so I wasn't disappointed. I won't hold the door open for you again, nor read the crap you say

Title: Re: Al, Zegh and Kittenburger, I'm challenging the three of you.
Post by: Bastet on March 01, 2016, 02:46:19 PM
Interesting how Hyke fails to see through it. Maybe she's just settling for anything even insincerity from a baby.
Title: Re: Al, Zegh and Kittenburger, I'm challenging the three of you.
Post by: Al Swearegen on March 01, 2016, 03:23:25 PM
Interesting how Hyke fails to see through it. Maybe she's just settling for anything even insincerity from a baby.

Well. In my humble opinion, he will do what I said. So I think IF he is looking to offload any responsibility AND IF he is looking to virtue signal and garner support from others (at the expense of trying to make Hyke look stupid and/or ignorant -and I won't pretend that doesn't piss me off) THEN  Hyke and everyone else he is trying to virtue signal has three choices:

A) ignore him and his petulance
B)  give him the pats and ruffles on the head that he will be after and say (verbatim)  "There, there Zegh. You were right, cleverer and more morally superior than those other too. I think you are prettier too. Don't worry about those others"
C) When he responds with his "See. I told you so!",  come straight back at him and say "Zegh. Hyke merely made a suggestion and now you are throwing this well-meaningness in her face. This is not her problem to solve, it's yours. You started it,  so don't even worry about Hyke, what are YOU suggesting to fix YOUR problem?"

Obviously B) is the worst and should look the worst.

I find it very interesting he stated the ignoring was for a month. Who do you imagine he is letting know and why? He is letting me and Kittenburger know. Take this to whatever conclusion you like but it is NOT about resolution
Title: Re: Al, Zegh and Kittenburger, I'm challenging the three of you.
Post by: Bastet on March 01, 2016, 03:27:29 PM
Interesting how Hyke fails to see through it. Maybe she's just settling for anything even insincerity from a baby.

Well. In my humble opinion, he will do what I said. So I think IF he is looking to offload any responsibility AND IF he is looking to virtue signal and garner support from others (at the expense of trying to make Hyke look stupid and/or ignorant -and I won't pretend that doesn't piss me off) THEN  Hyke and everyone else he is trying to virtue signal has three choices:

A) ignore him and his petulance
B)  give him the pats and ruffles on the head that he will be after and say (verbatim)  "There, there Zegh. You were right, cleverer and more morally superior than those other too. I think you are prettier too. Don't worry about those others"
C) When he responds with his "See. I told you so!",  come straight back at him and say "Zegh. Hyke merely made a suggestion and now you are throwing this well-meaningness in her face. This is not her problem to solve, it's yours. You started it,  so don't even worry about Hyke, what are YOU suggesting to fix YOUR problem?"

Obviously B) is the worst and should look the worst.

I find it very interesting he stated the ignoring was for a month. Who do you imagine he is letting know and why? He is letting me and Kittenburger know. Take this to whatever conclusion you like but it is NOT about resolution

It's about control.
Title: Re: Al, Zegh and Kittenburger, I'm challenging the three of you.
Post by: 'andersom' on March 01, 2016, 03:41:19 PM
OK, not a calling me back in unison, but I thought I did need to react on this.

Interesting how Hyke fails to see through it. Maybe she's just settling for anything even insincerity from a baby.

What did I not see in my challenge?

I hold all three of you equally responsible. No favours based on personal preference or politics or posts or what ever.

Zegh now is putting himself on a month of restraint. His responsibility to do that. His responsibility to decide what to do after that month too. My challenge, his responsibility.



The issues you and Zegh have are between the two of you.


I also think You, misrepresents Kittenburger's intentions Hyke. Kittenburger hold grudges and holds them deep enough to grow roots. She hates Zegh. She loathes him and the shit things he has said about her and still says. Kittenburger is obsessive and is sensitive.

You are right in that I do not get Kittenburger's intentions. I don't have the talent nor the energy to hold grudges and to hate with a passion. I do not have the drive that some people can get out of those grudges and that hate either.
It's something I look at in wonder. It would wear me out completely, yet Kittenburger seems to thrive at it.

And the whole thing about who I like, or who I like best, it simply is not part of why I made this challenge.

Just like I think it is not important at all to like people on I2. If I only wanted people around who I really like and agree with, I should be somewhere else than on I2.
Funny thing is, because of that, there are only very few people on I2 that I dislike. And they are hardly ever around. (Think Zyjaret and such)


BTW, babies are never insincere.  ;)
Title: Re: Al, Zegh and Kittenburger, I'm challenging the three of you.
Post by: Al Swearegen on March 01, 2016, 03:44:17 PM
Interesting how Hyke fails to see through it. Maybe she's just settling for anything even insincerity from a baby.

Well. In my humble opinion, he will do what I said. So I think IF he is looking to offload any responsibility AND IF he is looking to virtue signal and garner support from others (at the expense of trying to make Hyke look stupid and/or ignorant -and I won't pretend that doesn't piss me off) THEN  Hyke and everyone else he is trying to virtue signal has three choices:

A) ignore him and his petulance
B)  give him the pats and ruffles on the head that he will be after and say (verbatim)  "There, there Zegh. You were right, cleverer and more morally superior than those other too. I think you are prettier too. Don't worry about those others"
C) When he responds with his "See. I told you so!",  come straight back at him and say "Zegh. Hyke merely made a suggestion and now you are throwing this well-meaningness in her face. This is not her problem to solve, it's yours. You started it,  so don't even worry about Hyke, what are YOU suggesting to fix YOUR problem?"

Obviously B) is the worst and should look the worst.

I find it very interesting he stated the ignoring was for a month. Who do you imagine he is letting know and why? He is letting me and Kittenburger know. Take this to whatever conclusion you like but it is NOT about resolution

It's about control.

Absolutely.  Huge part of it.

If you look at how he has gone about things and what he has done wrong you will see everything he fucked up with, and will continue to will, centre around things like control, ego, entitlement,  immaturity, inability to be responsible, ego. a heightened sense of moral and intellectual superiority, and so on. It's a bad combination. It actually gave me pause to think whilst typing this to think with I was being unfair (I mean you could call me pedantic, arrogant. Opinionated and so on) but I think he IS all these things AND it inhibits him from acting like an adult.

Title: Re: Al, Zegh and Kittenburger, I'm challenging the three of you.
Post by: Bastet on March 01, 2016, 03:48:41 PM
OK, not a calling me back in unison, but I thought I did need to react on this.

Interesting how Hyke fails to see through it. Maybe she's just settling for anything even insincerity from a baby.

What did I not see in my challenge?

I hold all three of you equally responsible. No favours based on personal preference or politics or posts or what ever.

Zegh now is putting himself on a month of restraint. His responsibility to do that. His responsibility to decide what to do after that month too. My challenge, his responsibility.



The issues you and Zegh have are between the two of you.


I also think You, misrepresents Kittenburger's intentions Hyke. Kittenburger hold grudges and holds them deep enough to grow roots. She hates Zegh. She loathes him and the shit things he has said about her and still says. Kittenburger is obsessive and is sensitive.

You are right in that I do not get Kittenburger's intentions. I don't have the talent nor the energy to hold grudges and to hate with a passion. I do not have the drive that some people can get out of those grudges and that hate either.
It's something I look at in wonder. It would wear me out completely, yet Kittenburger seems to thrive at it.

And the whole thing about who I like, or who I like best, it simply is not part of why I made this challenge.

Just like I think it is not important at all to like people on I2. If I only wanted people around who I really like and agree with, I should be somewhere else than on I2.
Funny thing is, because of that, there are only very few people on I2 that I dislike. And they are hardly ever around. (Think Zyjaret and such)


BTW, babies are never insincere.  ;)

I may be a pig , but I am sincere. < that was on a birthday card I gave my dad when I was 8.
Title: Re: Al, Zegh and Kittenburger, I'm challenging the three of you.
Post by: 'andersom' on March 01, 2016, 04:00:56 PM
I may be a pig , but I am sincere. < that was on a birthday card I gave my dad when I was 8.
:rofl:
Title: Re: Al, Zegh and Kittenburger, I'm challenging the three of you.
Post by: Al Swearegen on March 01, 2016, 07:02:46 PM
OK, not a calling me back in unison, but I thought I did need to react on this.

Interesting how Hyke fails to see through it. Maybe she's just settling for anything even insincerity from a baby.

What did I not see in my challenge?

I hold all three of you equally responsible. No favours based on personal preference or politics or posts or what ever.

Zegh now is putting himself on a month of restraint. His responsibility to do that. His responsibility to decide what to do after that month too. My challenge, his responsibility.



The issues you and Zegh have are between the two of you.


I also think You, misrepresents Kittenburger's intentions Hyke. Kittenburger hold grudges and holds them deep enough to grow roots. She hates Zegh. She loathes him and the shit things he has said about her and still says. Kittenburger is obsessive and is sensitive.

You are right in that I do not get Kittenburger's intentions. I don't have the talent nor the energy to hold grudges and to hate with a passion. I do not have the drive that some people can get out of those grudges and that hate either.
It's something I look at in wonder. It would wear me out completely, yet Kittenburger seems to thrive at it.

And the whole thing about who I like, or who I like best, it simply is not part of why I made this challenge.

Just like I think it is not important at all to like people on I2. If I only wanted people around who I really like and agree with, I should be somewhere else than on I2.
Funny thing is, because of that, there are only very few people on I2 that I dislike. And they are hardly ever around. (Think Zyjaret and such)


BTW, babies are never insincere.  ;)

I may be a pig , but I am sincere. < that was on a birthday card I gave my dad when I was 8.

That's hilarious!
Title: Re: Al, Zegh and Kittenburger, I'm challenging the three of you.
Post by: 'Butterflies' on March 08, 2016, 04:09:51 PM
And lol @ being the subject of PMs. I definitely am flattered.

And to be absolutely clear - kittenburger knows nothing about me. I guess she is free to speculate, and ponder things out, sure, be the whole arm-chair-psychologist thing, I like to do that myself. My point is, if she claims to know any deep dark secret or whatever, just know that she does not know anything more than you do. If you wanna know more about me, Google me.

Just the fact that burger went to the lengths of actually instigating through PM says a lot about how far she is willing to go, just to "be right".
So, again, I am supposed to... what... ignore her PM-ing someone in private, to stir shit up?
How exactly do I ignore that, if I don't even know it's happening?

That's a question directed at you, Hyke. If "silent treatment" is the way to make this calm down, how do I practically employ this method, if it has absolutely no discernible effect? If nothing stops burger from just PMing you?

Oh, and kittenburger, here's tip #43 for you: I don't PM people about you, you know why? Cus I talk about you while you're here, so you can hear what I say. Also, because I look like less of a sneak shit weasel, by not sneaking around, like a little hobby manipulator. Amateur.


I've even openly stated when I've pmed al what I've said out here. Too lazy to find it and post it here in callout. It's no secret. I didn't start pming until I saw the bullshit with you and butterflies and she posted the teletubby on gopher Gary because she's too much of a coward to post it as herself.   


With hykes she didn't read what I said at all or missed it so I said it again in pm.

 :tinfoil: :tinfoil: :tinfoil: :tinfoil: :tinfoil:

Just seen this. Words fail me. Just :tard: :tard: :tard:
Title: Re: Al, Zegh and Kittenburger, I'm challenging the three of you.
Post by: 'Butterflies' on March 08, 2016, 05:07:24 PM

i said he's a liar and a hypocrite which I've said over and over out here but she sees something else she's too autistic.

Bit more than that. You pm-ed me, because I had supported Zegh in the call-out 8 months ago. So apparently this is really serious business right now. Because what I said 8 months ago mattered enough to PM me the other day. PEANUT GALLERY stuff that important?

And, you backed your allegations up with information on IP locations of one of the community sockpuppet's incarnations.

WTF? What do I need to know about IP locations of members? Staff can check that for trolls, banned people and sockpuppets, and that's the only use they should have, unless crimes are happening. And even then, it's not that hard to trick IP numbers.

I'm here on a forum, it's not so serious that there needs to be tracking of the real life location of members.

I'm guessing that would be my IP location?

Does somebody really give that psychofreak access to our IP addresses? That's actually really kinda disturbing :zombiefuck:
Title: Re: Al, Zegh and Kittenburger, I'm challenging the three of you.
Post by: Bastet on March 08, 2016, 05:09:59 PM

i said he's a liar and a hypocrite which I've said over and over out here but she sees something else she's too autistic.

Bit more than that. You pm-ed me, because I had supported Zegh in the call-out 8 months ago. So apparently this is really serious business right now. Because what I said 8 months ago mattered enough to PM me the other day. PEANUT GALLERY stuff that important?

And, you backed your allegations up with information on IP locations of one of the community sockpuppet's incarnations.

WTF? What do I need to know about IP locations of members? Staff can check that for trolls, banned people and sockpuppets, and that's the only use they should have, unless crimes are happening. And even then, it's not that hard to trick IP numbers.

I'm here on a forum, it's not so serious that there needs to be tracking of the real life location of members.

I'm guessing that would be my IP location?

Does somebody really give that psychofreak access to our IP addresses? That's actually really kinda disturbing :zombiefuck:

Hey idiot everyone can login that sock and see it. :D

(http://i1376.photobucket.com/albums/ah5/Poogodandprinceofdarkness/image_zpslsmmxpgu.jpeg) (http://s1376.photobucket.com/user/Poogodandprinceofdarkness/media/image_zpslsmmxpgu.jpeg.html)
Title: Re: Al, Zegh and Kittenburger, I'm challenging the three of you.
Post by: Bastet on March 08, 2016, 05:12:54 PM
I already took screencaps. :o
Title: Re: Al, Zegh and Kittenburger, I'm challenging the three of you.
Post by: Bastet on March 08, 2016, 05:14:19 PM
https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=QYHxGBH6o4M
Title: Re: Al, Zegh and Kittenburger, I'm challenging the three of you.
Post by: 'Butterflies' on March 08, 2016, 05:15:20 PM

i said he's a liar and a hypocrite which I've said over and over out here but she sees something else she's too autistic.

Bit more than that. You pm-ed me, because I had supported Zegh in the call-out 8 months ago. So apparently this is really serious business right now. Because what I said 8 months ago mattered enough to PM me the other day. PEANUT GALLERY stuff that important?

And, you backed your allegations up with information on IP locations of one of the community sockpuppet's incarnations.

WTF? What do I need to know about IP locations of members? Staff can check that for trolls, banned people and sockpuppets, and that's the only use they should have, unless crimes are happening. And even then, it's not that hard to trick IP numbers.

I'm here on a forum, it's not so serious that there needs to be tracking of the real life location of members.

I'm guessing that would be my IP location?

Does somebody really give that psychofreak access to our IP addresses? That's actually really kinda disturbing :zombiefuck:

Hey idiot everyone can login that sock and see it. :D

(http://i1376.photobucket.com/albums/ah5/Poogodandprinceofdarkness/image_zpslsmmxpgu.jpeg) (http://s1376.photobucket.com/user/Poogodandprinceofdarkness/media/image_zpslsmmxpgu.jpeg.html)

  :lol1: :lol1: :lol1:

Oh, you're right  :hahaha:  :facepalm2:

Still, very fucked up that you went to the bother of PMing Hyke about it :tinfoil:
Title: Re: Al, Zegh and Kittenburger, I'm challenging the three of you.
Post by: Bastet on March 09, 2016, 06:57:30 AM
I was too lazy to find and nest posts  all over I2 as a response. I think it's fucked up you hid behind Gary instead of posting as yourself.
Title: Re: Al, Zegh and Kittenburger, I'm challenging the three of you.
Post by: 'Butterflies' on March 09, 2016, 07:14:01 AM
I was too lazy to find and nest posts  all over I2 as a response. I think it's fucked up you hid behind Gary instead of posting as yourself.

I'm actually kind of sorry it caused you so much offence. At the time, I thought it was obvious that it was me who posted the picture. I had just returned to the site for the first time in ages, and I wanted a chance to play with the community sock puppet. I didn't think it was any big deal, and I certainly didn't think you'd still be going about it almost a year later.
Title: Re: Al, Zegh and Kittenburger, I'm challenging the three of you.
Post by: ZEGH8578 on March 09, 2016, 08:48:37 AM
I was too lazy to find and nest posts  all over I2 as a response. I think it's fucked up you hid behind Gary instead of posting as yourself.

I'm actually kind of sorry it caused you so much offence. At the time, I thought it was obvious that it was me who posted the picture. I had just returned to the site for the first time in ages, and I wanted a chance to play with the community sock puppet. I didn't think it was any big deal, and I certainly didn't think you'd still be going about it almost a year later.

it is the biggest deal ever, don't you know?
She will be going about it for years and PM people to warn them about your hypocrisy

(this does not count as me breaching my silent treatment by the way:
1. I'm replying to Butterflies
2. I'm responding to an actual argument, not just cat-picture "provocations")
Title: Re: Al, Zegh and Kittenburger, I'm challenging the three of you.
Post by: odeon on March 09, 2016, 02:18:26 PM
It's stormy in that glass of water. :zoinks:
Title: Re: Al, Zegh and Kittenburger, I'm challenging the three of you.
Post by: 'Butterflies' on March 09, 2016, 02:21:02 PM
It's stormy in that glass of water. :zoinks:

It's awful. Just awful :angrydance: :angrydance: :angrydance:
Title: Re: Al, Zegh and Kittenburger, I'm challenging the three of you.
Post by: Al Swearegen on March 09, 2016, 03:43:24 PM
I was too lazy to find and nest posts  all over I2 as a response. I think it's fucked up you hid behind Gary instead of posting as yourself.

I'm actually kind of sorry it caused you so much offence. At the time, I thought it was obvious that it was me who posted the picture. I had just returned to the site for the first time in ages, and I wanted a chance to play with the community sock puppet. I didn't think it was any big deal, and I certainly didn't think you'd still be going about it almost a year later.

Well you guys would not just take my side without question. I even felt obliged to promise 30 days grace from my obnoxious bullshit. I felt really bad about that.
Thankfully Butterflies is shitting up the forum and I'm gonna help her.
When I promised I had my fingers crossed.  Suckers!!!

Title: Re: Al, Zegh and Kittenburger, I'm challenging the three of you.
Post by: Al Swearegen on March 09, 2016, 03:55:21 PM
I was too lazy to find and nest posts  all over I2 as a response. I think it's fucked up you hid behind Gary instead of posting as yourself.

I'm actually kind of sorry it caused you so much offence. At the time, I thought it was obvious that it was me who posted the picture. I had just returned to the site for the first time in ages, and I wanted a chance to play with the community sock puppet. I didn't think it was any big deal, and I certainly didn't think you'd still be going about it almost a year later.

Not seeing the offence you s pool eak. Not seeing why we would have gaughed that a change in posting style from Gary  would somehow be obviously you who by your own admission hadn't pool opted for ages..

Again, you seem to require anyone reading your bullshit, to take a Hell of a lot on blind faith.. I do not accept the things you wish me to take as evident without good reason. I see no reason why anyone else should.
Title: Re: Al, Zegh and Kittenburger, I'm challenging the three of you.
Post by: Bastet on March 09, 2016, 04:00:05 PM
I feel sorry for butthurtflies
Title: Re: Al, Zegh and Kittenburger, I'm challenging the three of you.
Post by: 'Butterflies' on March 09, 2016, 04:22:16 PM
I feel sorry for butthurtflies

Indeed. And I truly envy you :thumbup:
Title: Re: Al, Zegh and Kittenburger, I'm challenging the three of you.
Post by: 'Butterflies' on March 09, 2016, 05:24:23 PM
I was too lazy to find and nest posts  all over I2 as a response. I think it's fucked up you hid behind Gary instead of posting as yourself.

I'm actually kind of sorry it caused you so much offence. At the time, I thought it was obvious that it was me who posted the picture. I had just returned to the site for the first time in ages, and I wanted a chance to play with the community sock puppet. I didn't think it was any big deal, and I certainly didn't think you'd still be going about it almost a year later.

Not seeing the offence you s pool eak. Not seeing why we would have gaughed that a change in posting style from Gary  would somehow be obviously you who by your own admission hadn't pool opted for ages..

Again, you seem to require anyone reading your bullshit, to take a Hell of a lot on blind faith.. I do not accept the things you wish me to take as evident without good reason. I see no reason why anyone else should.

I'm sorry. That is a bit hard to read, but I'll try to answer.


Quote
Not seeing the offence you s pool eak.

PsychoFreak PMd Hyke almost a year after I posted the picture, after tracking the IP number. She claims to Hyke that she "was pointing out the bullshit going on but obviously you (Hyke) don't care." I think we'll have to agree to disagree on this one, because from my point of view, that suggests clear offence has been taken.



Quote
I do not accept the things you wish me to take as evident without good reason.

I don't particularly want you to take anything as evident. I wasn't speaking to you. My comment was directed clearly to PsychoFreak. In fact, I really can't see what any of this has to do with you  :laugh:




Quote
Not seeing why we would have gaughed that a change in posting style from Gary  would somehow be obviously you who by your own admission hadn't pool opted for ages..

I had made several posts by that time. I thought it would have been obvious to most people that it was me. Clearly it wasn't obvious to you and PsychoFreak.





Title: Re: Al, Zegh and Kittenburger, I'm challenging the three of you.
Post by: Bastet on March 09, 2016, 06:31:13 PM
I was too lazy to find and nest posts  all over I2 as a response. I think it's fucked up you hid behind Gary instead of posting as yourself.

I'm actually kind of sorry it caused you so much offence. At the time, I thought it was obvious that it was me who posted the picture. I had just returned to the site for the first time in ages, and I wanted a chance to play with the community sock puppet. I didn't think it was any big deal, and I certainly didn't think you'd still be going about it almost a year later.

Not seeing the offence you s pool eak. Not seeing why we would have gaughed that a change in posting style from Gary  would somehow be obviously you who by your own admission hadn't pool opted for ages..

Again, you seem to require anyone reading your bullshit, to take a Hell of a lot on blind faith.. I do not accept the things you wish me to take as evident without good reason. I see no reason why anyone else should.

I'm sorry. That is a bit hard to read, but I'll try to answer.


Quote
Not seeing the offence you s pool eak.

PsychoFreak PMd Hyke almost a year after I posted the picture, after tracking the IP number. She claims to Hyke that she "was pointing out the bullshit going on but obviously you (Hyke) don't care." I think we'll have to agree to disagree on this one, because from my point of view, that suggests clear offence has been taken.



Quote
I do not accept the things you wish me to take as evident without good reason.

I don't particularly want you to take anything as evident. I wasn't speaking to you. My comment was directed clearly to PsychoFreak. In fact, I really can't see what any of this has to do with you  :laugh:




Quote
Not seeing why we would have gaughed that a change in posting style from Gary  would somehow be obviously you who by your own admission hadn't pool opted for ages..

I had made several posts by that time. I thought it would have been obvious to most people that it was me. Clearly it wasn't obvious to you and PsychoFreak.


It was only made obvious when Gary spazzed at you. You intended to go unnoticed.

Title: Re: Al, Zegh and Kittenburger, I'm challenging the three of you.
Post by: 'Butterflies' on March 09, 2016, 06:58:28 PM
I was too lazy to find and nest posts  all over I2 as a response. I think it's fucked up you hid behind Gary instead of posting as yourself.

I'm actually kind of sorry it caused you so much offence. At the time, I thought it was obvious that it was me who posted the picture. I had just returned to the site for the first time in ages, and I wanted a chance to play with the community sock puppet. I didn't think it was any big deal, and I certainly didn't think you'd still be going about it almost a year later.

Not seeing the offence you s pool eak. Not seeing why we would have gaughed that a change in posting style from Gary  would somehow be obviously you who by your own admission hadn't pool opted for ages..

Again, you seem to require anyone reading your bullshit, to take a Hell of a lot on blind faith.. I do not accept the things you wish me to take as evident without good reason. I see no reason why anyone else should.

I'm sorry. That is a bit hard to read, but I'll try to answer.


Quote
Not seeing the offence you s pool eak.

PsychoFreak PMd Hyke almost a year after I posted the picture, after tracking the IP number. She claims to Hyke that she "was pointing out the bullshit going on but obviously you (Hyke) don't care." I think we'll have to agree to disagree on this one, because from my point of view, that suggests clear offence has been taken.



Quote
I do not accept the things you wish me to take as evident without good reason.

I don't particularly want you to take anything as evident. I wasn't speaking to you. My comment was directed clearly to PsychoFreak. In fact, I really can't see what any of this has to do with you  :laugh:




Quote
Not seeing why we would have gaughed that a change in posting style from Gary  would somehow be obviously you who by your own admission hadn't pool opted for ages..

I had made several posts by that time. I thought it would have been obvious to most people that it was me. Clearly it wasn't obvious to you and PsychoFreak.


It was only made obvious when Gary spazzed at you. You intended to go unnoticed.

So, I intended to go unnoticed by posting a silly picture (exactly the type of thing I have a habit of doing,) within days of returning to the site, with the picture (jokingly) referring to you as a nazi (it's no secret that I have liberal views.)

If that was an attempt to go unnoticed, then it would have been an utterly tragic attempt. I have no problem believing that you and Les genuinely didn't know it was me without you tracking the IP number :laugh: but I'm pretty certain that most of the people on the site who knew me, and noticed I was back, would have known straight away who posted the picture.
Title: Re: Al, Zegh and Kittenburger, I'm challenging the three of you.
Post by: Al Swearegen on March 09, 2016, 07:16:15 PM
I was too lazy to find and nest posts  all over I2 as a response. I think it's fucked up you hid behind Gary instead of posting as yourself.

I'm actually kind of sorry it caused you so much offence. At the time, I thought it was obvious that it was me who posted the picture. I had just returned to the site for the first time in ages, and I wanted a chance to play with the community sock puppet. I didn't think it was any big deal, and I certainly didn't think you'd still be going about it almost a year later.

Not seeing the offence you s pool eak. Not seeing why we would have gaughed that a change in posting style from Gary  would somehow be obviously you who by your own admission hadn't pool opted for ages..

Again, you seem to require anyone reading your bullshit, to take a Hell of a lot on blind faith.. I do not accept the things you wish me to take as evident without good reason. I see no reason why anyone else should.

I'm sorry. That is a bit hard to read, but I'll try to answer.


Quote
Not seeing the offence you s pool eak.

PsychoFreak PMd Hyke almost a year after I posted the picture, after tracking the IP number. She claims to Hyke that she "was pointing out the bullshit going on but obviously you (Hyke) don't care." I think we'll have to agree to disagree on this one, because from my point of view, that suggests clear offence has been taken.



Quote
I do not accept the things you wish me to take as evident without good reason.

I don't particularly want you to take anything as evident. I wasn't speaking to you. My comment was directed clearly to PsychoFreak. In fact, I really can't see what any of this has to do with you  :laugh:




Quote
Not seeing why we would have gaughed that a change in posting style from Gary  would somehow be obviously you who by your own admission hadn't pool opted for ages..

I had made several posts by that time. I thought it would have been obvious to most people that it was me. Clearly it wasn't obvious to you and PsychoFreak.


It was only made obvious when Gary spazzed at you. You intended to go unnoticed.

So, I intended to go unnoticed by posting a silly picture (exactly the type of thing I have a habit of doing,) within days of returning to the site, with the picture (jokingly) referring to you as a nazi (it's no secret that I have liberal views.)

If that was an attempt to go unnoticed, then it would have been an utterly tragic attempt. I have no problem believing that you and Les genuinely didn't know it was me without you tracking the IP number :laugh: but I'm pretty certain that most of the people on the site who knew me, and noticed I was back, would have known straight away who posted the picture.

Seems to me you are making large assumptions.

I have no idea the picture but remember Gary being upset.

For your premise to sound reasonable it is needing to assume many things as reasonable. I do not see the things in the same light and for all your talk of what other people would have thought, felt or understood, I see nothing to evidence that. I did see two other people's reactions - Gary's and Psychofreak's
Neither suggested the same understanding or appreciation as what you claim to most people thought or felt.
Title: Re: Al, Zegh and Kittenburger, I'm challenging the three of you.
Post by: 'Butterflies' on March 09, 2016, 07:22:23 PM
I was too lazy to find and nest posts  all over I2 as a response. I think it's fucked up you hid behind Gary instead of posting as yourself.

I'm actually kind of sorry it caused you so much offence. At the time, I thought it was obvious that it was me who posted the picture. I had just returned to the site for the first time in ages, and I wanted a chance to play with the community sock puppet. I didn't think it was any big deal, and I certainly didn't think you'd still be going about it almost a year later.

Not seeing the offence you s pool eak. Not seeing why we would have gaughed that a change in posting style from Gary  would somehow be obviously you who by your own admission hadn't pool opted for ages..

Again, you seem to require anyone reading your bullshit, to take a Hell of a lot on blind faith.. I do not accept the things you wish me to take as evident without good reason. I see no reason why anyone else should.

I'm sorry. That is a bit hard to read, but I'll try to answer.


Quote
Not seeing the offence you s pool eak.

PsychoFreak PMd Hyke almost a year after I posted the picture, after tracking the IP number. She claims to Hyke that she "was pointing out the bullshit going on but obviously you (Hyke) don't care." I think we'll have to agree to disagree on this one, because from my point of view, that suggests clear offence has been taken.



Quote
I do not accept the things you wish me to take as evident without good reason.

I don't particularly want you to take anything as evident. I wasn't speaking to you. My comment was directed clearly to PsychoFreak. In fact, I really can't see what any of this has to do with you  :laugh:




Quote
Not seeing why we would have gaughed that a change in posting style from Gary  would somehow be obviously you who by your own admission hadn't pool opted for ages..

I had made several posts by that time. I thought it would have been obvious to most people that it was me. Clearly it wasn't obvious to you and PsychoFreak.


It was only made obvious when Gary spazzed at you. You intended to go unnoticed.

So, I intended to go unnoticed by posting a silly picture (exactly the type of thing I have a habit of doing,) within days of returning to the site, with the picture (jokingly) referring to you as a nazi (it's no secret that I have liberal views.)

If that was an attempt to go unnoticed, then it would have been an utterly tragic attempt. I have no problem believing that you and Les genuinely didn't know it was me without you tracking the IP number :laugh: but I'm pretty certain that most of the people on the site who knew me, and noticed I was back, would have known straight away who posted the picture.

Seems to me you are making large assumptions.

I have no idea the picture but remember Gary being upset.

For your premise to sound reasonable it is needing to assume many things as reasonable. I do not see the things in the same light and for all your talk of what other people would have thought, felt or understood, I see nothing to evidence that. I did see two other people's reactions - Gary's and Psychofreak's
Neither suggested the same understanding or appreciation as what you claim to most people thought or felt.

It really doesn't matter what you think. None of this involves you at all. You're just a guy who wasn't involved, desperately trying to get himself involved in a tiny irrelevant drama, which in no way involved you :laugh:
Title: Re: Al, Zegh and Kittenburger, I'm challenging the three of you.
Post by: Bastet on March 09, 2016, 08:45:43 PM

i said he's a liar and a hypocrite which I've said over and over out here but she sees something else she's too autistic.

Bit more than that. You pm-ed me, because I had supported Zegh in the call-out 8 months ago. So apparently this is really serious business right now. Because what I said 8 months ago mattered enough to PM me the other day. PEANUT GALLERY stuff that important?

And, you backed your allegations up with information on IP locations of one of the community sockpuppet's incarnations.

WTF? What do I need to know about IP locations of members? Staff can check that for trolls, banned people and sockpuppets, and that's the only use they should have, unless crimes are happening. And even then, it's not that hard to trick IP numbers.

I'm here on a forum, it's not so serious that there needs to be tracking of the real life location of members.

I'm guessing that would be my IP location?

Does somebody really give that psychofreak access to our IP addresses? That's actually really kinda disturbing :zombiefuck:


This post proves you are lying and a moron. Nice try. No one believes you you "just started" trash talking myself and al. So the bullshit show is pointless. It's obvious you are both liars. Both have been caught in lies.
Title: Re: Al, Zegh and Kittenburger, I'm challenging the three of you.
Post by: ZEGH8578 on March 09, 2016, 08:49:18 PM



This post proves you are lying and a moron. Nice try. No one believes you you "just started" trash talking myself and al. So the bullshit show is pointless. It's obvious you are both liars. Both have been caught in lies.

Who are you talking to?
Title: Re: Al, Zegh and Kittenburger, I'm challenging the three of you.
Post by: Bastet on March 09, 2016, 08:51:23 PM
I was too lazy to find and nest posts  all over I2 as a response. I think it's fucked up you hid behind Gary instead of posting as yourself.

I'm actually kind of sorry it caused you so much offence. At the time, I thought it was obvious that it was me who posted the picture. I had just returned to the site for the first time in ages, and I wanted a chance to play with the community sock puppet. I didn't think it was any big deal, and I certainly didn't think you'd still be going about it almost a year later.

Not seeing the offence you s pool eak. Not seeing why we would have gaughed that a change in posting style from Gary  would somehow be obviously you who by your own admission hadn't pool opted for ages..

Again, you seem to require anyone reading your bullshit, to take a Hell of a lot on blind faith.. I do not accept the things you wish me to take as evident without good reason. I see no reason why anyone else should.

I'm sorry. That is a bit hard to read, but I'll try to answer.


Quote
Not seeing the offence you s pool eak.

PsychoFreak PMd Hyke almost a year after I posted the picture, after tracking the IP number. She claims to Hyke that she "was pointing out the bullshit going on but obviously you (Hyke) don't care." I think we'll have to agree to disagree on this one, because from my point of view, that suggests clear offence has been taken.



Quote
I do not accept the things you wish me to take as evident without good reason.

I don't particularly want you to take anything as evident. I wasn't speaking to you. My comment was directed clearly to PsychoFreak. In fact, I really can't see what any of this has to do with you  :laugh:




Quote
Not seeing why we would have gaughed that a change in posting style from Gary  would somehow be obviously you who by your own admission hadn't pool opted for ages..

I had made several posts by that time. I thought it would have been obvious to most people that it was me. Clearly it wasn't obvious to you and PsychoFreak.


It was only made obvious when Gary spazzed at you. You intended to go unnoticed.

So, I intended to go unnoticed by posting a silly picture (exactly the type of thing I have a habit of doing,) within days of returning to the site, with the picture (jokingly) referring to you as a nazi (it's no secret that I have liberal views.)

If that was an attempt to go unnoticed, then it would have been an utterly tragic attempt. I have no problem believing that you and Les genuinely didn't know it was me without you tracking the IP number :laugh: but I'm pretty certain that most of the people on the site who knew me, and noticed I was back, would have known straight away who posted the picture.
Title: Re: Al, Zegh and Kittenburger, I'm challenging the three of you.
Post by: Bastet on March 09, 2016, 08:54:59 PM



This post proves you are lying and a moron. Nice try. No one believes you you "just started" trash talking myself and al. So the bullshit show is pointless. It's obvious you are both liars. Both have been caught in lies.

Who are you talking to?

The post is unedited. You fail. :D
Title: Re: Al, Zegh and Kittenburger, I'm challenging the three of you.
Post by: Bastet on March 09, 2016, 11:17:23 PM
I was too lazy to find and nest posts  all over I2 as a response. I think it's fucked up you hid behind Gary instead of posting as yourself.

I'm actually kind of sorry it caused you so much offence. At the time, I thought it was obvious that it was me who posted the picture. I had just returned to the site for the first time in ages, and I wanted a chance to play with the community sock puppet. I didn't think it was any big deal, and I certainly didn't think you'd still be going about it almost a year later.

Well you guys would not just take my side without question. I even felt obliged to promise 30 days grace from my obnoxious bullshit. I felt really bad about that.
Thankfully Butterflies is shitting up the forum and I'm gonna help her.
When I promised I had my fingers crossed.  Suckers!!!


Busted!!!!! Quoted before he could edit it and lie his way out of it good job Al I hate to say I told you so to odeon but I told you so.
Title: Re: Al, Zegh and Kittenburger, I'm challenging the three of you.
Post by: Al Swearegen on March 10, 2016, 05:44:24 AM
(http://www.mememaker.net/static/images/memes/4451351.jpg)
Title: Re: Al, Zegh and Kittenburger, I'm challenging the three of you.
Post by: ZEGH8578 on March 10, 2016, 08:21:51 AM
I was too lazy to find and nest posts  all over I2 as a response. I think it's fucked up you hid behind Gary instead of posting as yourself.

I'm actually kind of sorry it caused you so much offence. At the time, I thought it was obvious that it was me who posted the picture. I had just returned to the site for the first time in ages, and I wanted a chance to play with the community sock puppet. I didn't think it was any big deal, and I certainly didn't think you'd still be going about it almost a year later.

Well you guys would not just take my side without question. I even felt obliged to promise 30 days grace from my obnoxious bullshit. I felt really bad about that.
Thankfully Butterflies is shitting up the forum and I'm gonna help her.
When I promised I had my fingers crossed.  Suckers!!!


Busted!!!!! Quoted before he could edit it and lie his way out of it good job Al I hate to say I told you so to odeon but I told you so.

Oh, so you're talking to odeon this whole time?
What, you're the forum police now?

Do you have power of arrest? Or is it all just flabby, jiggly blubber?
By the way, DO calm your freakin nerves enough to deliver an intact quote pyramid.

Wait, wait, you think that quote is actually me?
You ACTUALLY think - with your obese little brain - that when I am snarky - I will use snark AGAINST MYSELF???

YES! I AM THAT STUPID!
Title: Re: Al, Zegh and Kittenburger, I'm challenging the three of you.
Post by: ZEGH8578 on March 10, 2016, 08:29:38 AM
Just to be perfectly clear, for you goddamn, illiteral retards one more time:

I DID NOT PROMISE TO NOT POST FOR 30 DAYS
I DID NOT PROMISE TO NOT REPLY FOR 30 DAYS
I DID NOT PROMISE TO IGNORE AL OR FATTIE FOR 30 DAYS

I PROMISED NOT TO REPLY TO CLEARLY POINTLESS CAT PICS AND OTHER MEMES MEANT ONLY TO DISRUPT THE FORUM. I WILL REPLY TO POSTS


If any of you two morons still have problems understanding this, feel free to ask, I will explain EVEN FURTHER

Exact quote:
Quote
I'm going to go a little further, and give Hyke 1 of my months to try "silent treatment" again. I will respond to normal communication, but not to "cat memes" or any other "provocative" bullshit.
One month, starting now.

Exact quote, points bolded.
Quote
I'm going to go a little further, and give Hyke 1 of my months to try "silent treatment" again. I will respond to normal communication, but not to "cat memes" or any other "provocative" bullshit.
One month, starting now.

Link: http://www.intensitysquared.com/index.php/topic,23530.msg1105673.html#msg1105673
(the post has never been edited)
Title: Re: Al, Zegh and Kittenburger, I'm challenging the three of you.
Post by: 'Butterflies' on March 10, 2016, 08:46:39 AM

i said he's a liar and a hypocrite which I've said over and over out here but she sees something else she's too autistic.

Bit more than that. You pm-ed me, because I had supported Zegh in the call-out 8 months ago. So apparently this is really serious business right now. Because what I said 8 months ago mattered enough to PM me the other day. PEANUT GALLERY stuff that important?

And, you backed your allegations up with information on IP locations of one of the community sockpuppet's incarnations.

WTF? What do I need to know about IP locations of members? Staff can check that for trolls, banned people and sockpuppets, and that's the only use they should have, unless crimes are happening. And even then, it's not that hard to trick IP numbers.

I'm here on a forum, it's not so serious that there needs to be tracking of the real life location of members.

I'm guessing that would be my IP location?

Does somebody really give that psychofreak access to our IP addresses? That's actually really kinda disturbing :zombiefuck:


This post proves you are lying and a moron. Nice try. No one believes you you "just started" trash talking myself and al. So the bullshit show is pointless. It's obvious you are both liars. Both have been caught in lies.

I have absolutely no idea what you're talking about. It doesn't make sense :LOL: :LOL:

Firstly, I made a point of notstarting trash talking Les. Responding to him, perhaps, but certainly not instigating anything with him. He isn't involved in this. I've been mocking you, with good justification.

Secondly, saying as this was clearly such a big deal to you, I stupidly took pity on you and tried to explain what happened. However, in the interests of continued LOLs, it's clearly better to let you continue to believe in some grand conspiracy between myself and Zegh :laugh:

Thirdly, I think you might be suffering from Paranoid Personality Disorder.
http://www.mentalhealth.com/home/dx/paranoidpersonality.html

Fourthly, did I mention that you're a paranoid freak?
Title: Re: Al, Zegh and Kittenburger, I'm challenging the three of you.
Post by: ZEGH8578 on March 10, 2016, 08:49:29 AM
Whenever you insult fattiefreak, you're "a hypocrite" or "a liar" or whatever.

Also, who gives a shit about liars, what is this, kindergarden?
Title: Re: Al, Zegh and Kittenburger, I'm challenging the three of you.
Post by: 'Butterflies' on March 10, 2016, 09:04:39 AM
I was too lazy to find and nest posts  all over I2 as a response. I think it's fucked up you hid behind Gary instead of posting as yourself.

I'm actually kind of sorry it caused you so much offence. At the time, I thought it was obvious that it was me who posted the picture. I had just returned to the site for the first time in ages, and I wanted a chance to play with the community sock puppet. I didn't think it was any big deal, and I certainly didn't think you'd still be going about it almost a year later.

Well you guys would not just take my side without question. I even felt obliged to promise 30 days grace from my obnoxious bullshit. I felt really bad about that.
Thankfully Butterflies is shitting up the forum and I'm gonna help her.
When I promised I had my fingers crossed.  Suckers!!!


Busted!!!!! Quoted before he could edit it and lie his way out of it good job Al I hate to say I told you so to odeon but I told you so.

Oh My Fucking God.

I just noticed this.

Am I reading this right?

 :hahaha: :hahaha: :hahaha: :hahaha: :hahaha:



PschoFreak. You do understand that Zegh didn't write what Les quoted? You do realize that Les edited Zeghs quote?

Quote
Busted!!!!! Quoted before he could edit it and lie his way out of it good job Al I hate to say I told you so to odeon but I told you so.

HAHAHA, you're even trying to grass him up to Odeon :hahaha:

LOL is such a cliche. I mean, we write LOL, but how often are we literally "Laughing Out Loud" about something someone says on the internet. Well, for almost the first time ever, I am genuinely Laughing Out Loud.

Utter fuckwittery of the highest order PschoFreak :hahaha:

What a thick ignorant pile of redneck blubber you really are.



OMFG. Classic. Pure classic :headbang2:

Thanks PsychoFreak. I knew this episode might be amusing, but your utter stupidity has elevated it into the stratosphere.

 :tard: :tard: :tard:
Title: Re: Al, Zegh and Kittenburger, I'm challenging the three of you.
Post by: "couldbecousin" on March 10, 2016, 09:11:03 AM
It's stormy in that glass of water. :zoinks:

  Is that the Swedish/Finnish/Moomin version of  "tempest in a teapot" ?  :orly:
Title: Re: Al, Zegh and Kittenburger, I'm challenging the three of you.
Post by: Bastet on March 10, 2016, 10:22:29 AM
more gaslighting oh my

The time on his edit is 2 minutes later than Al's quote.

What more has this man child edited out?
Title: Re: Al, Zegh and Kittenburger, I'm challenging the three of you.
Post by: ZEGH8578 on March 10, 2016, 10:35:51 AM
more gaslighting oh my

The time on his edit is 2 minutes later than Al's quote.

What more has this man child edited out?

Probably a whole bunch of self-antagonizing, Ross-agreeing stuff, written in Ross' incoherent style, I suppose.
Your pride in your own ignorance really fits your obesity, you know.
For example, butter, it contains saturated fat. What is saturated fat? :]

Also, I hope you realize, when you are this relatively young, and this fat, there is only one possible way for you. Well, discounting gastric bypass, but that's probably not an option for you (economy)

All you're in for, is the existence of a lumbering land whale. Post a pic when your double chin begins posing as a 3rd boob, I bet it'll be really sexay. *lumber, lumber, lumber* *richter-scale*

^See, this is my style. Not "I'm so obnoxious, hey everyone, Al was right all along"
Title: Re: Al, Zegh and Kittenburger, I'm challenging the three of you.
Post by: 'Butterflies' on March 10, 2016, 11:10:07 AM
more gaslighting oh my

The time on his edit is 2 minutes later than Al's quote.


No. Look again, you thick fat ignorant redneck :hahaha:

Zegh made his original post at « Reply #97 on: Yesterday at 15:48:37 »

Zegh edited his post less than 2 minutes later at « Last Edit: Yesterday at 15:50:18 by ZEGH8578 »

Les made his post with the edited quote almost 7 hour later, at « Reply #100 on: Yesterday at 22:43:24 »


It's obvious that you're thick as hell, but you appear to be seriously suffering the symptoms of paranoia. Get help :tard:
Title: Re: Al, Zegh and Kittenburger, I'm challenging the three of you.
Post by: MLA on March 10, 2016, 11:26:51 AM
I'm just posting here to get added to the insult stream for no reason  :autism:
Title: Re: Al, Zegh and Kittenburger, I'm challenging the three of you.
Post by: 'Butterflies' on March 10, 2016, 11:36:25 AM
I'm just posting here to get added to the insult stream for no reason  :autism:

Insults are awesome.

Insulting thick paranoid rednecks is the awesomest :headbang2: :headbang2: :headbang2:
Title: Re: Al, Zegh and Kittenburger, I'm challenging the three of you.
Post by: ZEGH8578 on March 10, 2016, 11:42:16 AM
I'm just posting here to get added to the insult stream for no reason  :autism:

For no reason? I think you'll be fine. Fattie and Al are specifically targeting me, and anyone who sides with me. I am only responding to their shit, so...

Side with me, or stalk me around, and you'll be insulted plenty :]
Title: Re: Al, Zegh and Kittenburger, I'm challenging the three of you.
Post by: MLA on March 10, 2016, 01:16:27 PM
I'm just posting here to get added to the insult stream for no reason  :autism:

For no reason? I think you'll be fine. Fattie and Al are specifically targeting me, and anyone who sides with me. I am only responding to their shit, so...

Side with me, or stalk me around, and you'll be insulted plenty :]

I'm here.  You'll see.  I don't have to say anything.   :zoinks:
Title: Re: Al, Zegh and Kittenburger, I'm challenging the three of you.
Post by: Bastet on March 10, 2016, 02:36:24 PM
I'm just posting here to get added to the insult stream for no reason  :autism:

Insults are awesome.

Insulting thick paranoid rednecks is the awesomest :headbang2: :headbang2: :headbang2:

I'm not a redneck. I'm a liberal. But you're so simpleminded you can't see past your own ideologue. The fact that I look conservative to you, makes you an extremist. You think conservative= bad liberal = good yea I though like that when I was younger too. Typical millennial ignorance.



https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=t2mU6USTBRE


Title: Re: Al, Zegh and Kittenburger, I'm challenging the three of you.
Post by: 'Butterflies' on March 10, 2016, 02:41:52 PM
I'm just posting here to get added to the insult stream for no reason  :autism:

Insults are awesome.

Insulting thick paranoid rednecks is the awesomest :headbang2: :headbang2: :headbang2:

The fact that I look conservative to you, makes you an extremist.


https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=t2mU6USTBRE

Or you an American :laugh:
Title: Re: Al, Zegh and Kittenburger, I'm challenging the three of you.
Post by: Bastet on March 10, 2016, 02:46:43 PM
(http://bottomfacedotcom.files.wordpress.com/2013/08/retard-autistic.jpg)
Title: Re: Al, Zegh and Kittenburger, I'm challenging the three of you.
Post by: ZEGH8578 on March 10, 2016, 02:47:18 PM
is fattieburger pretending to be old and wise again?
Title: Re: Al, Zegh and Kittenburger, I'm challenging the three of you.
Post by: Bastet on March 10, 2016, 02:49:45 PM
 :LOL:


Is basement boy pretending to be witty? Poor basement boy. Needs more weed. That should help solve all his problems.

Title: Re: Al, Zegh and Kittenburger, I'm challenging the three of you.
Post by: 'Butterflies' on March 10, 2016, 02:50:54 PM
is fattieburger pretending to be old and wise again?

Today she's trying to pretend to a non reactionary and a liberal :laugh: and not a redneck :laugh: :laugh:


Title: Re: Al, Zegh and Kittenburger, I'm challenging the three of you.
Post by: ZEGH8578 on March 10, 2016, 02:57:09 PM
is fattieburger pretending to be old and wise again?

Today she's trying to pretend to a non reactionary and a liberal :laugh: and not a redneck :laugh: :laugh:

And especially not fat.
OH and smert. You know how I know she's smert? She told me other people told her! SO THERE!
Title: Re: Al, Zegh and Kittenburger, I'm challenging the three of you.
Post by: 'Butterflies' on March 10, 2016, 03:03:35 PM
is fattieburger pretending to be old and wise again?

Today she's trying to pretend to a non reactionary and a liberal :laugh: and not a redneck :laugh: :laugh:

And especially not fat.
OH and smert. You know how I know she's smert? She told me other people told her! SO THERE!

Yes. She often tells people she's smart :laugh:

I wonder if she understands that Les edited your post yet :laugh:

Title: Re: Al, Zegh and Kittenburger, I'm challenging the three of you.
Post by: ZEGH8578 on March 10, 2016, 03:14:43 PM
She doesn't, the whole concept baffles her, and she is very, very proud of that.

As the Spanish falangist Jose Millan Astray put it "Death to intelligence! Long live death!"
Title: Re: Al, Zegh and Kittenburger, I'm challenging the three of you.
Post by: odeon on March 10, 2016, 03:23:31 PM
It's stormy in that glass of water. :zoinks:

  Is that the Swedish/Finnish/Moomin version of  "tempest in a teapot" ?  :orly:

It's a variation of it and it got the message across. Pretty much the only message in this thread.
Title: Re: Al, Zegh and Kittenburger, I'm challenging the three of you.
Post by: Bastet on March 10, 2016, 05:04:58 PM
So many presumptions. This is quite interesting.
Title: Re: Al, Zegh and Kittenburger, I'm challenging the three of you.
Post by: 'Butterflies' on March 10, 2016, 05:07:20 PM
So many presumptions. This is quite interesting.

Uh...... OK :thumbup:

But, do you understand that Les edited Zeghs post yet?
Title: Re: Al, Zegh and Kittenburger, I'm challenging the three of you.
Post by: Bastet on March 10, 2016, 05:11:57 PM
You underestimate me.

 :kapkao:

Title: Re: Al, Zegh and Kittenburger, I'm challenging the three of you.
Post by: 'Butterflies' on March 10, 2016, 05:21:17 PM
You underestimate me.

 :kapkao:

Cool :headbang2:

But, have you wrapped your head around the fact that Les edited Zeghs post yet?

Busted!!!!! Quoted before he could edit it and lie his way out of it good job Al I hate to say I told you so to odeon but I told you so.

 :tard: :hahaha:  :tard: :hahaha: :tard: :hahaha: :tard:
Title: Re: Al, Zegh and Kittenburger, I'm challenging the three of you.
Post by: Bastet on March 10, 2016, 05:22:16 PM
Lol nvm forget I said anything lololololololol
Title: Re: Al, Zegh and Kittenburger, I'm challenging the three of you.
Post by: Al Swearegen on March 11, 2016, 01:55:48 AM
Just to be perfectly clear, for you goddamn, illiteral retards one more time:

I DID NOT PROMISE TO NOT POST FOR 30 DAYS
I DID NOT PROMISE TO NOT REPLY FOR 30 DAYS
I DID NOT PROMISE TO IGNORE AL OR FATTIE FOR 30 DAYS

I PROMISED NOT TO REPLY TO CLEARLY POINTLESS CAT PICS AND OTHER MEMES MEANT ONLY TO DISRUPT THE FORUM. I WILL REPLY TO POSTS


If any of you two morons still have problems understanding this, feel free to ask, I will explain EVEN FURTHER

Exact quote:
Quote
I'm going to go a little further, and give Hyke 1 of my months to try "silent treatment" again. I will respond to normal communication, but not to "cat memes" or any other "provocative" bullshit.
One month, starting now.

Exact quote, points bolded.
Quote
I'm going to go a little further, and give Hyke 1 of my months to try "silent treatment" again. I will respond to normal communication, but not to "cat memes" or any other "provocative" bullshit.
One month, starting now.

Link: http://www.intensitysquared.com/index.php/topic,23530.msg1105673.html#msg1105673
(the post has never been edited)

(http://www.mememaker.net/static/images/memes/4452706.jpg)
Title: Re: Al, Zegh and Kittenburger, I'm challenging the three of you.
Post by: Al Swearegen on March 11, 2016, 02:04:41 AM
is fattieburger pretending to be old and wise again?

(http://www.mememaker.net/static/images/memes/4452765.jpg)
Title: Re: Al, Zegh and Kittenburger, I'm challenging the three of you.
Post by: 'andersom' on March 11, 2016, 03:12:29 AM
It's stormy in that glass of water. :zoinks:

  Is that the Swedish/Finnish/Moomin version of  "tempest in a teapot" ?  :orly:

It's a variation of it and it got the message across. Pretty much the only message in this thread.

Tempest in a teapot sounds interesting. Storm in a glass of water is way less exiting. This is not a tempest in a teapot.
Title: Re: Al, Zegh and Kittenburger, I'm challenging the three of you.
Post by: Bastet on March 11, 2016, 07:39:11 AM
They don't get it they never will. Their arrogance is their biggest flaw. Easy to exploit.
Title: Re: Al, Zegh and Kittenburger, I'm challenging the three of you.
Post by: 'Butterflies' on March 11, 2016, 08:12:00 AM
Their arrogance is their biggest flaw. Easy to exploit.

Title: Re: Al, Zegh and Kittenburger, I'm challenging the three of you.
Post by: Bastet on March 11, 2016, 09:32:16 AM
The best part is Zegh thinks he can "teach" anyone anything. Pmsl
Title: Re: Al, Zegh and Kittenburger, I'm challenging the three of you.
Post by: 'Butterflies' on March 11, 2016, 09:41:51 AM
The best part is Zegh thinks he can "teach" anyone anything. Pmsl

Each to their own :dunno:

For me, the best part was definitely watching you fail to understand that Les had edited Zeghs post, trying to grass Zegh up to Odeon, and then being too embarrassed to admit you were wrong  :tard: :hahaha:
Title: Re: Al, Zegh and Kittenburger, I'm challenging the three of you.
Post by: Bastet on March 11, 2016, 09:53:53 AM
The best part is Zegh thinks he can "teach" anyone anything. Pmsl

Each to their own :dunno:

For me, the best part was definitely watching you fail to understand that Les had edited Zeghs post, trying to grass Zegh up to Odeon, and then being too embarrassed to admit you were wrong  :tard: :hahaha:


Zegh should apologize to both hykes and odeon.
Title: Re: Al, Zegh and Kittenburger, I'm challenging the three of you.
Post by: 'Butterflies' on March 11, 2016, 09:56:17 AM
The best part is Zegh thinks he can "teach" anyone anything. Pmsl

Each to their own :dunno:

For me, the best part was definitely watching you fail to understand that Les had edited Zeghs post, trying to grass Zegh up to Odeon, and then being too embarrassed to admit you were wrong  :tard: :hahaha:


Zegh should apologize to both hykes and odeon.

 :tinfoil: :tinfoil:
Title: Re: Al, Zegh and Kittenburger, I'm challenging the three of you.
Post by: Al Swearegen on March 11, 2016, 10:14:39 AM
The best part is Zegh thinks he can "teach" anyone anything. Pmsl

(http://cdn.meme.am/instances/250x250/66730455.jpg)
Title: Re: Al, Zegh and Kittenburger, I'm challenging the three of you.
Post by: Bastet on March 11, 2016, 10:38:55 AM
The best part is Zegh thinks he can "teach" anyone anything. Pmsl

Each to their own :dunno:

For me, the best part was definitely watching you fail to understand that Les had edited Zeghs post, trying to grass Zegh up to Odeon, and then being too embarrassed to admit you were wrong  :tard: :hahaha:


Zegh should apologize to both hykes and odeon.

 :tinfoil: :tinfoil:


Hey butterflies  I was giving you a hard time I didn't see the day, didn't look. I'll mention how Zegh never owned up to Al's twilight reference and still won't but I saw it. :hahaha:

Hey, check out Sumerian god-kings. There's another example of time in religion. These kings not only lived very long - according to their scriptures - but kept rule for years and years - and centuries - and millennia

Dumuzid, "The shepherd" ruled for over 30 000 years
Good health!

I've tried to find out how this even works out, like, how did they figure it?
These are human years, they realize this, so they confirm that "yes, Dumuzid ruled for a thousand lifetimes"

It is also interesting that these super-long rulers seem to have (if ever) existed around 3000-2900 BC, within a century

With the lack of loud suggestions, I've imagined that it could be as simple as political gimmick of the days. Maybe nobody really believed that ol Dumuzid had kept the throne for 36 000 years, but that it was a time "granted" to him, like a title or something

This super-long rule tradition gradually cools off, that is also interesting, so there's a mechanic there that we're missing. Rulers go from 10 000 years, to 1000, to 100 (which is still long time to keep rule), to much more likely durations of a few years at the time, some as few as just one.

So it is really a choice between whether the Sumerian COULD  extend their life 30 000 years....or if they can't.

If you say they could, I think I would like some compelling evidence.

Or they couldn't,  in which case it was likely "slight"exaggeration, mistranslation, father inheriting name and title after dead and repeating cycle over many lifetimes,  abstract meaning lost context, or some flat out lie or propaganda.

Let's go with the least likely option.

Yeah, for sure. Those Sumerians lived 30 000 years. They sparkled in sunlight.

Title: Re: Al, Zegh and Kittenburger, I'm challenging the three of you.
Post by: ZEGH8578 on March 11, 2016, 10:47:25 AM
Fattieburger is like a little Duracell bunny autistic obsession
Title: Re: Al, Zegh and Kittenburger, I'm challenging the three of you.
Post by: ZEGH8578 on March 11, 2016, 10:52:47 AM
Also, how do I "own up to" someone ELSES statement?

This is how profoundly retarded you are. Now, please, be a grown-up and own up to MY statement, moron.
Title: Re: Al, Zegh and Kittenburger, I'm challenging the three of you.
Post by: 'Butterflies' on March 11, 2016, 11:29:41 AM
The best part is Zegh thinks he can "teach" anyone anything. Pmsl

Each to their own :dunno:

For me, the best part was definitely watching you fail to understand that Les had edited Zeghs post, trying to grass Zegh up to Odeon, and then being too embarrassed to admit you were wrong  :tard: :hahaha:


Zegh should apologize to both hykes and odeon.

 :tinfoil: :tinfoil:


Hey butterflies  I was giving you a hard time I didn't see the day, didn't look. I'll mention how Zegh never owned up to Al's twilight reference and still won't but I saw it. :hahaha:

Hey, check out Sumerian god-kings. There's another example of time in religion. These kings not only lived very long - according to their scriptures - but kept rule for years and years - and centuries - and millennia

Dumuzid, "The shepherd" ruled for over 30 000 years
Good health!

I've tried to find out how this even works out, like, how did they figure it?
These are human years, they realize this, so they confirm that "yes, Dumuzid ruled for a thousand lifetimes"

It is also interesting that these super-long rulers seem to have (if ever) existed around 3000-2900 BC, within a century

With the lack of loud suggestions, I've imagined that it could be as simple as political gimmick of the days. Maybe nobody really believed that ol Dumuzid had kept the throne for 36 000 years, but that it was a time "granted" to him, like a title or something

This super-long rule tradition gradually cools off, that is also interesting, so there's a mechanic there that we're missing. Rulers go from 10 000 years, to 1000, to 100 (which is still long time to keep rule), to much more likely durations of a few years at the time, some as few as just one.

So it is really a choice between whether the Sumerian COULD  extend their life 30 000 years....or if they can't.

If you say they could, I think I would like some compelling evidence.

Or they couldn't,  in which case it was likely "slight"exaggeration, mistranslation, father inheriting name and title after dead and repeating cycle over many lifetimes,  abstract meaning lost context, or some flat out lie or propaganda.

Let's go with the least likely option.

Yeah, for sure. Those Sumerians lived 30 000 years. They sparkled in sunlight.

OK. You're finally beginning to accept that you fucked up in the most embarrassing of fashions with Zeghs post. That is progress of sorts  :congrats:



I have no idea how Zegh is supposed to own up to Les' Twighlight reference from November last year though. I'm somewhat skeptical as to whether you've fully thought this through :dunno:
Title: Re: Al, Zegh and Kittenburger, I'm challenging the three of you.
Post by: ZEGH8578 on March 11, 2016, 11:51:51 AM
Everything is about "owning up"

For example, yesterday I ate salmon. You, Butterflies, now have to own up to that.
Title: Re: Al, Zegh and Kittenburger, I'm challenging the three of you.
Post by: 'Butterflies' on March 11, 2016, 12:08:12 PM
Everything is about "owning up"

For example, yesterday I ate salmon. You, Butterflies, now have to own up to that.

Only if you own up to the fact that I ate too many habaneros, and spent the last week battling constipation :zombiefuck:

Title: Re: Al, Zegh and Kittenburger, I'm challenging the three of you.
Post by: ZEGH8578 on March 11, 2016, 12:18:24 PM
I do! I own up to it!
I apologize for your constipation :'/
Title: Re: Al, Zegh and Kittenburger, I'm challenging the three of you.
Post by: rock hound on March 11, 2016, 05:03:52 PM
Now we have really descended into the  :poo: :fos: :birdpoop:  I2!   Have fun, children!    :santa:
Title: Re: Al, Zegh and Kittenburger, I'm challenging the three of you.
Post by: 'andersom' on March 11, 2016, 06:44:10 PM
Now we have really descended into the  :poo: :fos: :birdpoop:  I2!   Have fun, children!    :santa:

I would indeed not advise anyone to drink from this windy glass of water.
Title: Re: Al, Zegh and Kittenburger, I'm challenging the three of you.
Post by: Gopher Gary on March 11, 2016, 06:56:29 PM
Now we have really descended into the  :poo: :fos: :birdpoop:  I2!   Have fun, children!    :santa:

All the mature people aren't reacting to it.  :zoinks:
Title: Re: Al, Zegh and Kittenburger, I'm challenging the three of you.
Post by: rock hound on March 11, 2016, 08:11:45 PM
Now we have really descended into the  :poo: :fos: :birdpoop:  I2!   Have fun, children!    :santa:

I would indeed not advise anyone to drink from this windy glass of water.

Nor would I!   
Title: Re: Al, Zegh and Kittenburger, I'm challenging the three of you.
Post by: Al Swearegen on March 12, 2016, 01:19:58 AM
I do! I own up to it!
I apologize for your constipation :'/

(http://www.mememaker.net/static/images/memes/4454007.jpg)
Title: Re: Al, Zegh and Kittenburger, I'm challenging the three of you.
Post by: Al Swearegen on March 12, 2016, 01:20:56 AM
Fattieburger is like a little Duracell bunny autistic obsession

(http://www.mememaker.net/static/images/memes/4454017.jpg)
Title: Re: Al, Zegh and Kittenburger, I'm challenging the three of you.
Post by: odeon on March 12, 2016, 02:49:54 AM
It's stormy in that glass of water. :zoinks:

  Is that the Swedish/Finnish/Moomin version of  "tempest in a teapot" ?  :orly:

It's a variation of it and it got the message across. Pretty much the only message in this thread.

Tempest in a teapot sounds interesting. Storm in a glass of water is way less exiting. This is not a tempest in a teapot.

This is like watching paint dry. White paint.
Title: Re: Al, Zegh and Kittenburger, I'm challenging the three of you.
Post by: Al Swearegen on March 12, 2016, 04:45:45 AM
It's stormy in that glass of water. :zoinks:

  Is that the Swedish/Finnish/Moomin version of  "tempest in a teapot" ?  :orly:

It's a variation of it and it got the message across. Pretty much the only message in this thread.

Tempest in a teapot sounds interesting. Storm in a glass of water is way less exiting. This is not a tempest in a teapot.

This is like watching paint dry. White paint.

Oh I don't know?

(http://suptg.thisisnotatrueending.com/archive/18320539/images/1331712760937.jpg)
Title: Re: Al, Zegh and Kittenburger, I'm challenging the three of you.
Post by: Al Swearegen on March 12, 2016, 07:47:01 AM
This thread is a strange one but I like how it has evolved. Of course it is a trainwreck but I find that interesting unto itself.

The callout? Still a little confused about what was going on there, but I know I was one of the parties under the spotlight so I muddled through confused. It gave me a bit of an opportunity to sledge and mock, Zegh...so what the Hell?

It was pretty obvious that each of us was as good or as bad as each other in the feuding. I said something to this effect around post #75.

Of course around here He makes it "clear" he is going on a month of "silent treatment" and will not respond to any "provocative bullshit".

It is a great line of bullshit isn't it? Who bought it? Hyke did I think

Zegh now is putting himself on a month of restraint. His responsibility to do that. His responsibility to decide what to do after that month too. My challenge, his responsibility.

and Odeon too...

Zegh and Hyke won, Zegh by deciding to accept the challenge for a month and Hyke for issuing the challenge to begin with.

You know who did not for one moment see any truth to Zegh's proclamations? Me!

I will tell you why? I identified a number of things he did to "sort things out" the so-called "silent treatment" was one, and it did not work. Not then and wouldn't now (in the same way going on holidays does not sort out troubles at home). Yet he chose to go on a period of silence and then he gave me and Psychofreak heads up on how long it would be. That was generous don't you think?
(Imagine a general sending a message to the opposing general that he was sending 300 troops to the north of the city he was at on midnight of the next night....and dear God, "No, Zegh, neither of us are in any way shape or form, generals).

So why did he say this? Virtue signalling. "I am really so much better than these two trolls. I am worthy and have substance. I am a victim in this and will prove it by one month of silence. Then if it does not work I will point it out and say "See!"" and thereby allowing him to maintain credibility as the "better man" who is a victim of circumstance, in the long-running feud.

The problem is that he is only virtue signalling and is not ACTUALLY wanting to take responsibility nor resolve things and he certainly does not want to forgo a chance at an insult. So he bitches to Butterflies, she comes in and stirs the pot again, and he starts throwing out insults from behind Butterflies. How he justifies this I don't know, it would likely be that he either:
a) Crossed his fingers when he promised
b) says he "just could not bear to hold his tongue because Butterflies (whatever bullshit)...."
c) felt like he had to defend his honour?
d) considered this "normal conversation" and not "provocative bullshit"
But its a lie and always was.

The thread had died and Butterflies decided to wade in and reanimate it. I am not that invested in the thread. Happy to keep throwing memes at it until it dies. It served its purpose of showing Zegh to be the liar and hypocrite he has been accused of by Psychofreak (I may have said something to that effect myself too). In breaking his promise (which you will not neither myself nor Psychofreak made, nor are bound by) he proves his dishonesty.

I think that is terrific.

And Zegh, if you are reading, cross "getting reinforcements" off your list of ways to "resolve" things and avoid responsibility or accountability. It did not and will not work. Neither did or will the "silent treatment". You did start things and you ought to actually resolve them, because this is making you look really bad, and pissing off the forum, the longer this feuding goes on.

EDIT: I am not saying I am better than he for stirring shit out of him with memes and what not. No we are both rolling in the muck together but I will not pretend I am doing otherwise...that is the difference.
Title: Re: Al, Zegh and Kittenburger, I'm challenging the three of you.
Post by: ZEGH8578 on March 12, 2016, 09:08:21 AM
d) considered this "normal conversation" and not "provocative bullshit"
But its a lie and always was.

You decide?
You decide a lot, don't you.

Wait, am I allowed to reply to this, or is this entire post of yours just more provocative bullshit?
Because if it is, if you're just babbling emptily, pretending to talk to Odeon, while only trying to get me to react, then I will redact this reply :]

Does "resolve the problem" mean "agree with you"?
Because that is how small children do things.
I DO NOT AGREE WITH YOU, when it comes to Feminism.
Deal with it. Like an adult. Challenge.

Also, your method is bordering pure bullying:
1. I am "pissing off the forum" MERELY by EXISTING here, because EVERY post I make ANYWHERE causes you to sabotage that thread.
2. Your method is: IF YOU POST, I RUIN EVERYONE ELSES DAY.
3. You are holding the forum hostage untill I agree with your views on Feminism basically. Go fuck yourself.
Title: Re: Al, Zegh and Kittenburger, I'm challenging the three of you.
Post by: ZEGH8578 on March 12, 2016, 09:13:38 AM
Al, if YOU post - I kill a puppy.

Does that make YOU or ME responsible for the death of the puppy?

In your mind, you would be responsible.
In reality, I would be mentally ill, to make such a proposition. I would not recognize this though, cus I would be mentally ill.
Title: Re: Al, Zegh and Kittenburger, I'm challenging the three of you.
Post by: Al Swearegen on March 12, 2016, 09:16:44 AM
d) considered this "normal conversation" and not "provocative bullshit"
But its a lie and always was.

You decide?
You decide a lot, don't you.

Wait, am I allowed to reply to this, or is this entire post of yours just more provocative bullshit?
Because if it is, if you're just babbling emptily, pretending to talk to Odeon, while only trying to get me to react, then I will redact this reply :]

(http://www.mememaker.net/static/images/memes/4454242.jpg)

You going to resolve things, yet? No? No, you like this and want it to keep going.
Title: Re: Al, Zegh and Kittenburger, I'm challenging the three of you.
Post by: ZEGH8578 on March 12, 2016, 09:17:41 AM
No, Al. I am not going to fucking agree with you - for you to stop throwing a tantrum...

Christ...  ::)

IN MY OPINION, FEMINISM IS STILL RELEVANT.
There, keep crying fag.
Title: Re: Al, Zegh and Kittenburger, I'm challenging the three of you.
Post by: Al Swearegen on March 12, 2016, 09:22:21 AM
No, Al. I am not going to fucking agree with you - for you to stop throwing a tantrum...

Christ...  ::)

IN MY OPINION, FEMINISM IS STILL RELEVANT.
There, keep crying fag.

(http://www.mememaker.net/static/images/memes/4454251.jpg)
Title: Re: Al, Zegh and Kittenburger, I'm challenging the three of you.
Post by: ZEGH8578 on March 12, 2016, 09:26:22 AM
Just so that this is entirely clarified:

Al is THIS obsessed, and dedicated to stalking me around the forum - dedicated to destroying OTHER people's threads (blaming me)
because
I DO NOT AGREE with his POLITICAL VIEWS.

1. He previously thought I did
2. The fact that I didn't makes him react even more.

TO BE CLEAR
I DO NOT RESPOND TO HARASSMENT, I AM NOT GOING TO CHANGE MY POLITICAL VIEWS BECAUSE OF A LOSER THROWING A TANTRUM, HOLDING A FORUM HOSTAGE.

What if this was turned around? What if I went sabotaging every thread on the forum, because HE does not agree with MY political views?

Addition: I admit that I did NOT WANT to DEBATE that particular political issue with him. This offended him, and he opened the Call-Out, to discuss politics with me there, because he thought I would feel obliged to respond. I did not feel obliged.
This is the "responsability" he is refering to.

Addition 2: THIS post is the first time I lower myself to HIS level, and talk about HIM as if he was not here, like HE has done with ME in OVER 20 posts. I usually address him directly.
Title: Re: Al, Zegh and Kittenburger, I'm challenging the three of you.
Post by: Al Swearegen on March 12, 2016, 09:35:55 AM
Just so that this is entirely clarified:

Al is THIS obsessed, and dedicated to stalking me around the forum - dedicated to destroying OTHER people's threads (blaming me)
because
I DO NOT AGREE with his POLITICAL VIEWS.

1. He previously thought I did
2. The fact that I didn't makes him react even more.

TO BE CLEAR
I DO NOT RESPOND TO HARASSMENT, I AM NOT GOING TO CHANGE MY POLITICAL VIEWS BECAUSE OF A LOSER THROWING A TANTRUM, HOLDING A FORUM HOSTAGE.

What if this was turned around? What if I went sabotaging every thread on the forum, because HE does not agree with MY political views?

Addition: I admit that I did NOT WANT to DEBATE that particular political issue with him. This offended him, and he opened the Call-Out, to discuss politics with me there, because he thought I would feel obliged to respond. I did not feel obliged.
This is the "responsability" he is refering to.

Addition 2: THIS post is the first time I lower myself to HIS level, and talk about HIM as if he was not here, like HE has done with ME in OVER 20 posts. I usually address him directly.

(http://www.mememaker.net/static/images/memes/4454264.jpg)
Title: Re: Al, Zegh and Kittenburger, I'm challenging the three of you.
Post by: Bastet on March 12, 2016, 09:52:39 AM
Stop being so fucking aspie, and learn to read between the lines you've had 60 years to learn it.

I was asking what would compell the sumerians to truly believe their rulers had existed for 30 000 years - or if they pretended to believe.
Mid-ways I even spell it out for you but you didn't read the whole thing, DIDYA
(It is where I add that it's probably a political gimmick (as opposed to something they truly believe) and that all these rulers are squashed within a century of REAL time, meaning there's no way any of them lived longer than 100 years each. READ, you ignoramus, READ)

Holy shit, you are retarded sometimes, man. Like, really truly dumb.


:LMAO:

And what's the inconcistency there?
He needs to learn to properly read, wether it is between the lines, especially when obvious - or read entire messages, so not to miss important contexts.

And the end, why did you bold that? He is retarded and truly dumb. Are you trying to show some kind of irony, like, it's me who is dumb, then why do I call him dumb, or something?
Are you just now learning about irony?


Why help you when I can just watch this unfold instead?  :mischief:

Rofl?

Stop being so fucking aspie, and learn to read between the lines you've had 60 years to learn it.

I was asking what would compell the sumerians to truly believe their rulers had existed for 30 000 years - or if they pretended to believe.
Mid-ways I even spell it out for you but you didn't read the whole thing, DIDYA
(It is where I add that it's probably a political gimmick (as opposed to something they truly believe) and that all these rulers are squashed within a century of REAL time, meaning there's no way any of them lived longer than 100 years each. READ, you ignoramus, READ)

Holy shit, you are retarded sometimes, man. Like, really truly dumb.


:LMAO:

And what's the inconcistency there?
He needs to learn to properly read, wether it is between the lines, especially when obvious - or read entire messages, so not to miss important contexts.

And the end, why did you bold that? He is retarded and truly dumb. Are you trying to show some kind of irony, like, it's me who is dumb, then why do I call him dumb, or something?
Are you just now learning about irony?

But Zegh...

Tell us how you really feel.

Then tell me about 30 000 year old Vampire God-men of Sumeria. Its really interesting. Especially how you tell it. You have a knack.
Title: Re: Al, Zegh and Kittenburger, I'm challenging the three of you.
Post by: Bastet on March 12, 2016, 09:54:14 AM
I especially love how Zegh minimizes this incident lolololololololol he went completely silent when he was made a fool by al.
Title: Re: Al, Zegh and Kittenburger, I'm challenging the three of you.
Post by: Bastet on March 12, 2016, 09:55:59 AM
Stop being so fucking aspie, and learn to read between the lines, you've had 60 years to learn it.

I was asking what would compell the sumerians to truly believe their rulers had existed for 30 000 years - or if they pretended to believe.
Mid-ways I even spell it out for you but you didn't read the whole thing, DIDYA
(It is where I add that it's probably a political gimmick (as opposed to something they truly believe) and that all these rulers are squashed within a century of REAL time, meaning there's no way any of them lived longer than 100 years each. READ, you ignoramus, READ)

Holy shit, you are retarded sometimes, man. Like, really truly dumb.

This is Dumuzid

(http://www.mycitybynight.co.za/wp-content/uploads/2011/08/edward-sparkles.jpg)

He has been around a while. Lock up your teenage daughters.
Title: Re: Al, Zegh and Kittenburger, I'm challenging the three of you.
Post by: ZEGH8578 on March 12, 2016, 10:09:16 AM
Just so that this is entirely clarified:

Al is THIS obsessed, and dedicated to stalking me around the forum - dedicated to destroying OTHER people's threads (blaming me)
because
I DO NOT AGREE with his POLITICAL VIEWS.

1. He previously thought I did
2. The fact that I didn't makes him react even more.

TO BE CLEAR
I DO NOT RESPOND TO HARASSMENT, I AM NOT GOING TO CHANGE MY POLITICAL VIEWS BECAUSE OF A LOSER THROWING A TANTRUM, HOLDING A FORUM HOSTAGE.

What if this was turned around? What if I went sabotaging every thread on the forum, because HE does not agree with MY political views?

Addition: I admit that I did NOT WANT to DEBATE that particular political issue with him. This offended him, and he opened the Call-Out, to discuss politics with me there, because he thought I would feel obliged to respond. I did not feel obliged.
This is the "responsability" he is refering to.

Addition 2: THIS post is the first time I lower myself to HIS level, and talk about HIM as if he was not here, like HE has done with ME in OVER 20 posts. I usually address him directly.

Addition 3: Fattieburger's involvement is a tad bit more complex. She has OCD, and couldn't stop if she wanted to. She has even PM-ed people to "warn" them about my "danger" :D With her it basically begun with me stating that she is an idiot, bluntly, and without explanation. I have since explained it several times, but you know, OCD, what can you do.
Title: Re: Al, Zegh and Kittenburger, I'm challenging the three of you.
Post by: Bastet on March 12, 2016, 10:14:42 AM
Lol @ your interpretation
Title: Re: Al, Zegh and Kittenburger, I'm challenging the three of you.
Post by: Al Swearegen on March 12, 2016, 10:30:17 AM
Just so that this is entirely clarified:

Al is THIS obsessed, and dedicated to stalking me around the forum - dedicated to destroying OTHER people's threads (blaming me)
because
I DO NOT AGREE with his POLITICAL VIEWS.

1. He previously thought I did
2. The fact that I didn't makes him react even more.

TO BE CLEAR
I DO NOT RESPOND TO HARASSMENT, I AM NOT GOING TO CHANGE MY POLITICAL VIEWS BECAUSE OF A LOSER THROWING A TANTRUM, HOLDING A FORUM HOSTAGE.

What if this was turned around? What if I went sabotaging every thread on the forum, because HE does not agree with MY political views?

Addition: I admit that I did NOT WANT to DEBATE that particular political issue with him. This offended him, and he opened the Call-Out, to discuss politics with me there, because he thought I would feel obliged to respond. I did not feel obliged.
This is the "responsability" he is refering to.

Addition 2: THIS post is the first time I lower myself to HIS level, and talk about HIM as if he was not here, like HE has done with ME in OVER 20 posts. I usually address him directly.

Addition 3: Fattieburger's involvement is a tad bit more complex. She has OCD, and couldn't stop if she wanted to. She has even PM-ed people to "warn" them about my "danger" :D With her it basically begun with me stating that she is an idiot, bluntly, and without explanation. I have since explained it several times, but you know, OCD, what can you do.

(http://www.mememaker.net/static/images/memes/4454303.jpg)
Title: Re: Al, Zegh and Kittenburger, I'm challenging the three of you.
Post by: Bastet on March 12, 2016, 10:32:27 AM
 Zegh made attacks on my appearance before I did his and it was because I said he was jealous. Zegh didn't like I was "sucking al's cock" because he wants his butt kissed.
Title: Re: Al, Zegh and Kittenburger, I'm challenging the three of you.
Post by: ZEGH8578 on March 12, 2016, 10:34:15 AM
Just so that this is entirely clarified:

Al is THIS obsessed, and dedicated to stalking me around the forum - dedicated to destroying OTHER people's threads (blaming me)
because
I DO NOT AGREE with his POLITICAL VIEWS.

1. He previously thought I did
2. The fact that I didn't makes him react even more.

TO BE CLEAR
I DO NOT RESPOND TO HARASSMENT, I AM NOT GOING TO CHANGE MY POLITICAL VIEWS BECAUSE OF A LOSER THROWING A TANTRUM, HOLDING A FORUM HOSTAGE.

What if this was turned around? What if I went sabotaging every thread on the forum, because HE does not agree with MY political views?

Addition: I admit that I did NOT WANT to DEBATE that particular political issue with him. This offended him, and he opened the Call-Out, to discuss politics with me there, because he thought I would feel obliged to respond. I did not feel obliged.
This is the "responsability" he is refering to.

Addition 2: THIS post is the first time I lower myself to HIS level, and talk about HIM as if he was not here, like HE has done with ME in OVER 20 posts. I usually address him directly.

Addition 3: Fattieburger's involvement is a tad bit more complex. She has OCD, and couldn't stop if she wanted to. She has even PM-ed people to "warn" them about my "danger" :D With her it basically begun with me stating that she is an idiot, bluntly, and without explanation. I have since explained it several times, but you know, OCD, what can you do.
Title: Re: Al, Zegh and Kittenburger, I'm challenging the three of you.
Post by: Al Swearegen on March 12, 2016, 10:42:43 AM
Just so that this is entirely clarified:

Al is THIS obsessed, and dedicated to stalking me around the forum - dedicated to destroying OTHER people's threads (blaming me)
because
I DO NOT AGREE with his POLITICAL VIEWS.

1. He previously thought I did
2. The fact that I didn't makes him react even more.

TO BE CLEAR
I DO NOT RESPOND TO HARASSMENT, I AM NOT GOING TO CHANGE MY POLITICAL VIEWS BECAUSE OF A LOSER THROWING A TANTRUM, HOLDING A FORUM HOSTAGE.

What if this was turned around? What if I went sabotaging every thread on the forum, because HE does not agree with MY political views?

Addition: I admit that I did NOT WANT to DEBATE that particular political issue with him. This offended him, and he opened the Call-Out, to discuss politics with me there, because he thought I would feel obliged to respond. I did not feel obliged.
This is the "responsability" he is refering to.

Addition 2: THIS post is the first time I lower myself to HIS level, and talk about HIM as if he was not here, like HE has done with ME in OVER 20 posts. I usually address him directly.

Addition 3: Fattieburger's involvement is a tad bit more complex. She has OCD, and couldn't stop if she wanted to. She has even PM-ed people to "warn" them about my "danger" :D With her it basically begun with me stating that she is an idiot, bluntly, and without explanation. I have since explained it several times, but you know, OCD, what can you do.

(http://www.mememaker.net/static/images/memes/4454310.jpg)
Title: Re: Al, Zegh and Kittenburger, I'm challenging the three of you.
Post by: 'Butterflies' on March 12, 2016, 10:55:29 AM
I especially love how Zegh minimizes this incident lolololololololol he went completely silent when he was made a fool by al.

Ok, you want someone to reply to this, you thick redneck.

Here is Zeghs post:

Hey, check out Sumerian god-kings. There's another example of time in religion. These kings not only lived very long - according to their scriptures - but kept rule for years and years - and centuries - and millennia

Dumuzid, "The shepherd" ruled for over 30 000 years
Good health!

I've tried to find out how this even works out, like, how did they figure it?
These are human years, they realize this, so they confirm that "yes, Dumuzid ruled for a thousand lifetimes"

It is also interesting that these super-long rulers seem to have (if ever) existed around 3000-2900 BC, within a century

With the lack of loud suggestions, I've imagined that it could be as simple as political gimmick of the days. Maybe nobody really believed that ol Dumuzid had kept the throne for 36 000 years, but that it was a time "granted" to him, like a title or something

This super-long rule tradition gradually cools off, that is also interesting, so there's a mechanic there that we're missing. Rulers go from 10 000 years, to 1000, to 100 (which is still long time to keep rule), to much more likely durations of a few years at the time, some as few as just one.

Now, the most cursory of reads, simply looking at the tone of Zeghs post, strongly hints that Zegh is not in any way suggesting that Dumuzid actually lived for 36000 years.

However, if you're unable to deduce Zeghs opinion from the tone of his post, then these two sentences spell out Zeghs opinion in black and white:

Quote
I've imagined that it could be as simple as political gimmick of the days. Maybe nobody really believed that ol Dumuzid had kept the throne for 36 000 years, but that it was a time "granted" to him, like a title or something

There is clearly some utter stupidity going on here, but it's certainly not coming from Zegh. At first glance, it appears to be coming from Les, but I'm prepared to give him the benefit of the doubt, and assume that he's deliberately misrepresenting Zeghs comments.

If Les is aware that he's misrepresenting Zeghs post, then that leaves you as the sole source of this epic triumph of ignorance :tard: :hahaha:
Title: Re: Al, Zegh and Kittenburger, I'm challenging the three of you.
Post by: Bastet on March 12, 2016, 11:00:37 AM
I especially love how Zegh minimizes this incident lolololololololol he went completely silent when he was made a fool by al.

Ok, you want someone to reply to this, you thick redneck.

Here is Zeghs post:

Hey, check out Sumerian god-kings. There's another example of time in religion. These kings not only lived very long - according to their scriptures - but kept rule for years and years - and centuries - and millennia

Dumuzid, "The shepherd" ruled for over 30 000 years
Good health!

I've tried to find out how this even works out, like, how did they figure it?
These are human years, they realize this, so they confirm that "yes, Dumuzid ruled for a thousand lifetimes"

It is also interesting that these super-long rulers seem to have (if ever) existed around 3000-2900 BC, within a century

With the lack of loud suggestions, I've imagined that it could be as simple as political gimmick of the days. Maybe nobody really believed that ol Dumuzid had kept the throne for 36 000 years, but that it was a time "granted" to him, like a title or something

This super-long rule tradition gradually cools off, that is also interesting, so there's a mechanic there that we're missing. Rulers go from 10 000 years, to 1000, to 100 (which is still long time to keep rule), to much more likely durations of a few years at the time, some as few as just one.

Now, the most cursory of reads, simply looking at the tone of Zeghs post, strongly hints that Zegh is not in any way suggesting that Dumuzid actually lived for 36000 years.

However, if you're unable to deduce Zeghs opinion from the tone of his post, then these two sentences spell out Zeghs opinion in black and white:

Quote
I've imagined that it could be as simple as political gimmick of the days. Maybe nobody really believed that ol Dumuzid had kept the throne for 36 000 years, but that it was a time "granted" to him, like a title or something

There is clearly some utter stupidity going on here, but it's certainly not coming from Zegh. At first glance, it appears to be coming from Les, but I'm prepared to give him the benefit of the doubt, and assume that he's deliberately misrepresenting Zeghs comments.

If Les is aware that he's misrepresenting Zeghs post, then that leaves you as the sole source of this epic triumph of ignorance :tard: :hahaha:


Zegh got trolled you idiot. Look who's not admitting it. Liar liar.
Title: Re: Al, Zegh and Kittenburger, I'm challenging the three of you.
Post by: ZEGH8578 on March 12, 2016, 11:01:39 AM
Wait, we've been unaware of this, this entire time?

AL IS TROLLING?

OH MY GOD, THIS CHANGES EVERYTHING :O
Title: Re: Al, Zegh and Kittenburger, I'm challenging the three of you.
Post by: Bastet on March 12, 2016, 11:04:23 AM
 :congrats:


On being an idiot. You blatantly missed the twilight reference when laughed at you still didn't get it like the idiot that you are. Now you are trying to gloss over it.
Title: Re: Al, Zegh and Kittenburger, I'm challenging the three of you.
Post by: ZEGH8578 on March 12, 2016, 11:06:31 AM
:congrats:


On being an idiot. You blatantly missed the twilight reference when laughed at you still didn't get it like the idiot that you are. Now you are trying to gloss over it.

You sure are obsessed with that twilight reference.
(I didn't watch twilight...  ::))

Also, you can't "blatantly miss" something. Blatant means to do something without shame, do something openly and deliberately. To miss something is to be unaware of something.
I can't be unaware of something deliberately.

Learn English.
Title: Re: Al, Zegh and Kittenburger, I'm challenging the three of you.
Post by: Bastet on March 12, 2016, 11:36:09 AM
:congrats:


On being an idiot. You blatantly missed the twilight reference when laughed at you still didn't get it like the idiot that you are. Now you are trying to gloss over it.

You sure are obsessed with that twilight reference.
(I didn't watch twilight...  ::))

Also, you can't "blatantly miss" something. Blatant means to do something without shame, do something openly and deliberately. To miss something is to be unaware of something.
I can't be unaware of something deliberately.

Learn English.


I didn't watch twilight either, never read the books. It is common knowledge that it is about sparkly vampires. There are countless Internet memes and parodies. People complaining about Stephenie Meyers lack of writing skills.


You nitpicking about a single word is childish, and so very you. My medications have messed with my memory, so I forgot much of what I've learned. I'm sure you'll make fun of that, too.


(http://assets.diylol.com/hfs/696/eea/444/resized/hipster-grammar-nazi-meme-generator-1-13721f.jpg)

Title: Re: Al, Zegh and Kittenburger, I'm challenging the three of you.
Post by: ZEGH8578 on March 12, 2016, 11:40:20 AM
Wait, wait, wait...

You've medicated your memory away? WHAT DOES THAT REMIND ME OF? HMMM...
Oh, the word "projection" :O

Another thing comes to mind too, OH, yes, it's boo-fuckin-hoo :o
Title: Re: Al, Zegh and Kittenburger, I'm challenging the three of you.
Post by: Bastet on March 12, 2016, 11:56:48 AM
Not self medicated. I've been prescribed meds by doctors you dingbat.
Title: Re: Al, Zegh and Kittenburger, I'm challenging the three of you.
Post by: ZEGH8578 on March 12, 2016, 12:00:59 PM
No need to get defensive :o
Oh, wait, who am I talking to

GET DEFENSIVE!
Why are you getting meds prescribed by The Doctor? :o
Title: Re: Al, Zegh and Kittenburger, I'm challenging the three of you.
Post by: Bastet on March 12, 2016, 12:04:30 PM
 :cbc:

You are grasping at straws again.

More circle jerking to be expected.
Title: Re: Al, Zegh and Kittenburger, I'm challenging the three of you.
Post by: ZEGH8578 on March 12, 2016, 12:05:51 PM
Betweeb you and Al, you mean? Probably. It's been going on for half a year, and over tens of threads.
Good call, there, burger, I'll give you that!

*THUMP THUMP THUMP*
*expressionless glance*

:D
Title: Re: Al, Zegh and Kittenburger, I'm challenging the three of you.
Post by: ZEGH8578 on March 12, 2016, 12:30:15 PM
Just so that this is entirely clarified:

Al is THIS obsessed, and dedicated to stalking me around the forum - dedicated to destroying OTHER people's threads (blaming me)
because
I DO NOT AGREE with his POLITICAL VIEWS.

1. He previously thought I did
2. The fact that I didn't makes him react even more.

TO BE CLEAR
I DO NOT RESPOND TO HARASSMENT, I AM NOT GOING TO CHANGE MY POLITICAL VIEWS BECAUSE OF A LOSER THROWING A TANTRUM, HOLDING A FORUM HOSTAGE.

What if this was turned around? What if I went sabotaging every thread on the forum, because HE does not agree with MY political views?

Addition: I admit that I did NOT WANT to DEBATE that particular political issue with him. This offended him, and he opened the Call-Out, to discuss politics with me there, because he thought I would feel obliged to respond. I did not feel obliged.
This is the "responsability" he is refering to.

Addition 2: THIS post is the first time I lower myself to HIS level, and talk about HIM as if he was not here, like HE has done with ME in OVER 20 posts. I usually address him directly.

Addition 3: Fattieburger's involvement is a tad bit more complex. She has OCD, and couldn't stop if she wanted to. She has even PM-ed people to "warn" them about my "danger" :D With her it basically begun with me stating that she is an idiot, bluntly, and without explanation. I have since explained it several times, but you know, OCD, what can you do.
Title: Re: Al, Zegh and Kittenburger, I'm challenging the three of you.
Post by: 'Butterflies' on March 12, 2016, 12:59:36 PM
My medications have messed with my memory, so I forgot much of what I've learned. I'm sure you'll make fun of that, too.


A known side effect of Xenical is producing loose oily turds. I've never heard of it messing with memory though :dunno:

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Orlistat
Title: Re: Al, Zegh and Kittenburger, I'm challenging the three of you.
Post by: ZEGH8578 on March 12, 2016, 01:04:00 PM
 :rofl:

Either way, we probably should cut her some slack. You know, be nice and not hurt her feelings. You know, not be :viking:
Title: Re: Al, Zegh and Kittenburger, I'm challenging the three of you.
Post by: Al Swearegen on March 12, 2016, 03:23:00 PM
Hey guys, you guys been at it all this time? Sorry,  I had to go to sleep.  So have we come to the bit where Zegh acknowledges that he has some responsibility for the position he has in this long running feud or is he trying to blame everyone and everything other than himself? Still lying and being hypocritical and perhaps examining and spinning the minor details of long dead arguments? Trying to be condescending and play at having more moral or intellectual recourse in your premises than PsychoFreak?

Oh continue by all means. I would not stop you squandering your little credibility. 

Bit of a hint, this is not resolving things and is not divesting you of responsibility for your part in things.
Title: Re: Al, Zegh and Kittenburger, I'm challenging the three of you.
Post by: ZEGH8578 on March 12, 2016, 03:34:11 PM
Hey Al!
Go fuck your mother
in the mouth
 :zoinks:
Title: Re: Al, Zegh and Kittenburger, I'm challenging the three of you.
Post by: Al Swearegen on March 12, 2016, 03:44:03 PM
Hey Al!
Go fuck your mother
in the mouth
 :zoinks:

This post was far less wordy. Running out of steam?
Title: Re: Al, Zegh and Kittenburger, I'm challenging the three of you.
Post by: ZEGH8578 on March 12, 2016, 03:45:44 PM
Hey Al!
Go fuck your mother
in the mouth
 :zoinks:

This post was far less wordy. Running out of steam?

Eh, "yes"  ::)

What exactly do you think the answer would be to that retarded question, you fucking moron?
Do you EVER say ANYTHING that contains ACTUAL substance, or is it ALL rethorical tactical manipulative trickery?

Do you know the difference, by now?
Title: Re: Al, Zegh and Kittenburger, I'm challenging the three of you.
Post by: Al Swearegen on March 12, 2016, 03:49:15 PM
Hey Al!
Go fuck your mother
in the mouth
 :zoinks:

This post was far less wordy. Running out of steam?

Eh, "yes"  ::)

What exactly do you think the answer would be to that retarded question, you fucking moron?
Do you EVER say ANYTHING that contains ACTUAL substance, or is it ALL rethorical tactical manipulative trickery?

Do you know the difference, by now?

Longer, but I was to see posts as long as that one you kept repeating. The one with scream capitalised words.. Why?
Because long rants from me is business as normal, but with you it looks unhinged. You posting like you are unhinged, makes me smile.
Title: Re: Al, Zegh and Kittenburger, I'm challenging the three of you.
Post by: ZEGH8578 on March 12, 2016, 03:54:15 PM
You know, repeatedly telling others how you function is a sign of insecurity. You are actually repeatedly trying to confirm to yourself how you function.
All the "I'm a mighty sleeping bear!" in the world will not make you ANY kind of bear like. Maybe wombat.

Also, check my post history, you illiterate idiot. I have over a hundred very long posts. In one thread, I type out the whole Yugoslav war. Why did you not know this? Are you too aspiely distracted to be able to connect usernames and post-content?

OH, is that why you thought, this whole time, I was a "fellow" anti-feminist? :D
Title: Re: Al, Zegh and Kittenburger, I'm challenging the three of you.
Post by: Al Swearegen on March 12, 2016, 04:06:02 PM
You know, repeatedly telling others how you function is a sign of insecurity. You are actually repeatedly trying to confirm to yourself how you function.
All the "I'm a mighty sleeping bear!" in the world will not make you ANY kind of bear like. Maybe wombat.

Also, check my post history, you illiterate idiot. I have over a hundred very long posts. In one thread, I type out the whole Yugoslav war. Why did you not know this? Are you too aspiely distracted to be able to connect usernames and post-content?

OH, is that why you thought, this whole time, I was a "fellow" anti-feminist? :D

Longer and more caps locks. If I don't read it, at least give the impression of seething impotent Rage spilling over
Title: Re: Al, Zegh and Kittenburger, I'm challenging the three of you.
Post by: ZEGH8578 on March 12, 2016, 04:07:02 PM
You shouldn't call Rage impotent, he has always been cool to you
Title: Re: Al, Zegh and Kittenburger, I'm challenging the three of you.
Post by: Al Swearegen on March 12, 2016, 06:37:13 PM
Zegh has been playing you all for suckers as he tried doing with the 1 month silent treatment. This pretense of him wanting to sort things out (that he made in the Peanut Gallery) is a con. I hate the dishonesty of it. He actually wants this and all but requested it by any reading.

Do not take my word. Read what he said. My response and his.

Pm’s titled I am not a woman
Or a girl.

So, try to "hound" me off the site. Try. Try harder. Try all you can muster. Let me watch you try :]

Why would I care to hound you off the site and why would you being a woman ir not have to do with anything?

Why are you making no sense again?

Why do you think I may be motivated to "obey" you?
Really Al? Still with the rethorical questions?

If I am here, and I understand words, why do you still keep doing the rethorics?

Woman - because you are afraid of women, you are hostile towards them, and you find it easyer to impose on them.

Hound me off the site, because that is what you're trying to do. "What, meee? That makes no sense!" fuck off, come on, be an adult, at least try, or is that too much of a challenge for you?
"You think I was wanting YOU to read it. Think about it a little, Zegh. It will come to you."

Are you going to be a huge rethorical riddle regarding this too? "Hmmm, what, meee?"

Nope. I am not hostile to women. I am hostile to people sometimes though, if they are idiots. Sometimes they are men and sometimes they are women. Gender is neither here nor there. You can be honest or not. I don't much care.

I am neither scared nor dislike women. Nor idea what you are on about. Probably some ultra-edgy troll. You are boring me.

"Hounding you off the site"? That is a bit much. I have been in three or four threads arguing with you. Let's not make it bigger than it is.

As for the riddle...actually it isn't THAT hard.
Yes you are, you can camoflage it as "absolute equality" all you like, but it's not fooling anybody. Well, maybe it fools young people, but you aren't young. You know what you are doing.

And of course you are trying to hound me off the site, you pretty much admitted it in your "riddle" in Sg1008's thread, which - by the way - you decided to sabotage only hours after he created it, just to get back at me.

Hounding someone off the site isn't as big a deal as you make it sound. I bet you have done it before, with little weaklings that made you feel powerful. With chicks. That is why you are resorting to the tactic so readily, and i have no trouble believing that you have half a genuine hope that you'll manage to bully me out of here, given that you have started to reply to me outside of your "call out". And don't play stupid about it, a consequence of playing stupid - is appearing stupid. Do you want to appear stupid?

I will start in no particular order and go forth.

Firstly it is an strange narrative. But here is the thing. I hope you can appreciate what I am saying here and understand.
Asserting that I do or think something is fine, but I do not think I need to be convinced. Either you are right or you are wrong. If you are right, then I would know it to be right and so you would simply be telling me what I know. If you are wrong then telling me that what you believe to be fact is fact and my refusal to embrace this fact makes it untrue, is not only false, disingenuous, but also very weird.

You get this right? "You think what I think you think and if you don't think what I think you think then you must or else you are lying"

Okay, do I want to appear stupid? Do I care if I look stupid in front of you? Not at all. Do I care if YOU think I am stupid? No.
Do I care if others think I am stupid? I am sure many already do.

Hounding you off he site? Nope. Are you compelled to go? I don't think so. Do I want you to go? Not particularly, don't care either way to be honest. I think you are being an asshat. Much like Richard used to be. He came good though. You aren't exactly new and I don't think you are fragile nor easily rattled and I think you can handle a bit of jostling. You decided to get a bit personal, I did not cry. Why are you making a big deal when I get a few jabs in?

Have I hounded people off the board before? Would not imagine so. If you imagine differently, imagine what you would need to say or do, as a single member, to "hound me off". If I choose to log on to I2, it is with the disclaimer that anyone may come out and have a go at me, and I will need to defend. I will not run away and retreat.

Back to the attacking women. Okay stack up all the women I have attacked and all the men and let's see numbers and reasons. I do not give a damn what someone's gender is. Why does it matter so much to YOU. It doesn't to me but it REALLY does to you.

As for attacking you in a thread. I look ed at the unread posts and the top two were the Confederate Flag. I read it complete and put in my two cents. I saw you had responded last to one about misunderstanding. I was genuinely interested. You had lied quite extensively in previous posts and I thought maybe you were going to say that you were misunderstanding some things and not outright lying or something. Instead I saw you talk calling someone Pub and wondering about if a person was called Pub and how good a name that was. It was priceless, because I imagined you contemplating absolute nonsense this whilst stoned out of your mind (Like Lewis Carroll whacked out of his head on laudanum when he contemplated a white rabbit with a watch) . Hence my comment
Yes you are, you can camoflage it as "absolute equality" all you like, but it's not fooling anybody. Well, maybe it fools young people, but you aren't young. You know what you are doing.

And of course you are trying to hound me off the site, you pretty much admitted it in your "riddle" in Sg1008's thread, which - by the way - you decided to sabotage only hours after he created it, just to get back at me.

Hounding someone off the site isn't as big a deal as you make it sound. I bet you have done it before, with little weaklings that made you feel powerful. With chicks. That is why you are resorting to the tactic so readily, and i have no trouble believing that you have half a genuine hope that you'll manage to bully me out of here, given that you have started to reply to me outside of your "call out". And don't play stupid about it, a consequence of playing stupid - is appearing stupid. Do you want to appear stupid?

Just out of curiosity. Who are the "weaklings" and chicks that you think are weak here?
Should they be in a protected class?
I am happy to put t up in a thread. We work out who fits the bill, we ask if the rest of the forum minds them in a protected class for the weaklings
If this is your position on it, I see no point in re-hashing this any further.

Since neither of us will agree, I'm inclined to let Hyke "win", in her discrete bid for calm.

It is my position on it. If you know me at all, you know that I am arrogant enough not to rely on telling sneaky lies to get my way. I will tell it straight up. It doesn't make me the nicest person here, and I accept that, but I am not dishonest.

I do not much care if there is peace or not. If I object to a position I will contest it. If someone gets personal or nasty, I don't get offended but I don't bother reigning myself in, I will be a little more mean-spirited than absolutely necessary.

I don't imagine anyone here is either immune from censor nor unable to handle it when they get it. I can't imagine anyone here would be able to hound me off the site. I don't believe that of others.

That is the sociopathy I'm refering to.

You have a problem with me, not CBC. These people are even sticking up for you, and still, you include them in your "subtle" attacks against me.

Do you realize this, at all, when you do it?

For example, if CBC were to post a topic about "A", and I am to reply in that topic - you will gladly ruin HER thread, in order to get to ME.

No, no, keep it up, buddy, show everyone how you do things. If not only because you know everyone, by now, everyone wants you to give it a fucking rest - and that is why you can't give it a rest.

So, have fun with this; I - Zegh - Am ordering you to obey the following: Stop harassing CBC and Hykeaswell. (now see if you can obey me)

I am sure it was an interesting read

Here is a picture of a cat and a watermelon

(http://trstn.com/wp-content/uploads/2009/06/the_cat_is_pushing_a_watermelon_out_of_a_lake-300x291.jpg)


Do not be fooled by his moral virtue signalling. He is simply trying to offer a pretense of being above it all and a victim of poor circumstance that he is trying to make the best of. But pretense is pretense.

He has no wish to contribute to this resolving. He would certrainly like it to disappear because he is seemingly incapable of sorting out his own shit. What responsibilities does he have in life? How old is he? He doesn't want to be responsible for resolving messes of his own making. Better pretending to be a victim and blame others.
Title: Re: Al, Zegh and Kittenburger, I'm challenging the three of you.
Post by: ZEGH8578 on March 12, 2016, 06:46:00 PM
:D
I knew you read what I wrote. Every word :]

And, you know, I am willing to let this thing die, but that does not equal bending over for you. You seem to have confused the two.

That is why I said:
Ah well. What's done is done then.

(Seriously though, I am still open to suggestions, but they have to be sensible.)

I am NOT going to agree with you. But if you're begging for a formal apology or something, then fine. Just tell me what I need to apologize for - and be reasonable.

(you posted this «02:37:13»
My edit happened at 01:50:30, just in case you wanna get sneaky again)

And I don't see why you're surprised that I'm having fun with your inability to control yourself  ::)
Title: Re: Al, Zegh and Kittenburger, I'm challenging the three of you.
Post by: Al Swearegen on March 12, 2016, 07:53:27 PM
:D
I knew you read what I wrote. Every word :]

And, you know, I am willing to let this thing die, but that does not equal bending over for you. You seem to have confused the two.

That is why I said:
Ah well. What's done is done then.

(Seriously though, I am still open to suggestions, but they have to be sensible.)

I am NOT going to agree with you. But if you're begging for a formal apology or something, then fine. Just tell me what I need to apologize for - and be reasonable.

(you posted this «02:37:13»
My edit happened at 01:50:30, just in case you wanna get sneaky again)

And I don't see why you're surprised that I'm having fun with your inability to control yourself  ::)

(http://www.mememaker.net/static/images/memes/4454643.jpg)