INTENSITY²

Politics, Mature and taboo => Political Pundits => Topic started by: Adam on January 15, 2011, 08:17:15 PM

Title: What's worse -
Post by: Adam on January 15, 2011, 08:17:15 PM
?
Title: Re: What's worse -
Post by: Scrapheap on January 15, 2011, 08:18:34 PM
I say that burning transgendered people should be made legal.  :zoinks:
Title: Re: What's worse -
Post by: Adam on January 15, 2011, 08:20:13 PM
 :lol:
Title: Re: What's worse -
Post by: Queen Victoria on January 15, 2011, 08:23:25 PM
As long as we don't burn my bras it's okay.
Title: Re: What's worse -
Post by: Osensitive1 on January 15, 2011, 08:26:53 PM
Both seem wasteful, hazardous and unnecessary.
Title: Re: What's worse -
Post by: "couldbecousin" on January 15, 2011, 09:28:17 PM
Both seem wasteful, hazardous and unnecessary.

Unless you're really cold!    :snowing:
Title: Re: What's worse -
Post by: Al Swearegen on January 15, 2011, 09:31:52 PM
Well I would shake my head at book burning because it is pointless.
I would hurt someone showing the disrespect to burn our flag.
On reflection I think Flag is worse.
Title: Re: What's worse -
Post by: Adam on January 15, 2011, 09:35:27 PM
What if the flag was a swastica ? :P

I think book burning is worse as flags are simply symbols. Books are books. A book is of more value than a flag I think
Title: Re: What's worse -
Post by: Semicolon on January 15, 2011, 09:51:57 PM
I am an American, and I believe in the fundamental ideals that led to the formation of this country. Because of this, I believe that flag burning, as political speech, is not only appropriate but should be legally protected. The one issue I have with this is that burning a flag has the potential to start fires or injure people.

As for the burning of books, it would depend on whether the books were being burned to make a political statement, or as censorship. I don't believe in censorship (and I don't believe that anyone who is a member here believes that censorship is, in general, a good thing). However, book burning to make a political statement should be allowed, so long as the information found in the books is replicated elsewhere and is available to interested parties. Otherwise, the book burning would be de facto censorship. Of course, precautions should be taken so as to prevent the injury of others or loss of property.

I did not consider apolitical motives for book/flag burning; my opinion on these motives would depend on the circumstances of the burning.