INTENSITY²

Arena for the Competitive => Main Event Callouts => Topic started by: odeon on November 02, 2009, 03:56:41 PM

Title: Bint! WTF Were You Thinking?
Post by: odeon on November 02, 2009, 03:56:41 PM
WTF were you thinking? A PM to any one of us in the staff would have been enough: guys, please, I don't want to be a newsbox slave anymore, take the stars away from me, I don't want to do it. Or just post it without talking about the pretty colours of your stars, just fucking say so, anything that isn't construed to be ambivalent, and you are not a newsbox slave any more.

But no, you had to post porn visible to anyone, you had to expose the whole site and make us a target to anyone and to our host in particular, because the only reason we can post anything beyond what WP is pouring out is because we have an adults only policy that we enforce as rigidly as we can.

That is thrown out of the fucking window as soon as someone posts porn or ANYTHING requiring that 18-yo limit visible to a non-member. Can't you see that? Can't you see that even when the stuff we post is formally legal, the only reason we can do it without causing too much fuss is that we fly under the fucking radar?

WTF were you thinking?
Title: Re: Bint! WTF Were You Thinking?
Post by: Blasted on November 02, 2009, 03:59:12 PM
Bint apologies.

Although part two of the protest would have been spectacular :(
Title: Re: Bint! WTF Were You Thinking?
Post by: odeon on November 02, 2009, 04:01:30 PM
Apology accepted.

Would you have brought us down completely with part two? :-\
Title: Re: Bint! WTF Were You Thinking?
Post by: Blasted on November 02, 2009, 04:04:46 PM
Depends how you see "bringing down"  :laugh:  I had a whole range of annoying, epilepsy-inducing gifs up my sleeve  8)
 
Title: Re: Bint! WTF Were You Thinking?
Post by: odeon on November 02, 2009, 04:07:46 PM
:-\

That's one thing, but stuffed arses is not something we can have visible to the outside world.
Title: Re: Bint! WTF Were You Thinking?
Post by: earthboundmisfit on November 02, 2009, 04:08:28 PM


Like this one?


I am disrespectful to dirt!

(http://i6.photobucket.com/albums/y246/hafftrak/MrSparkle.gif)

Can you see that I am serious?
Title: Re: Bint! WTF Were You Thinking?
Post by: Blasted on November 02, 2009, 04:08:45 PM
Although I don't see why you're so angry, we post porn in threads visible to everyone all the time.  It's not like the nasty stuff is solely contained in the hidden forums.
Title: Re: Bint! WTF Were You Thinking?
Post by: earthboundmisfit on November 02, 2009, 04:14:02 PM


http://seizuresalad.ytmnd.com/
Title: Re: Bint! WTF Were You Thinking?
Post by: Blasted on November 02, 2009, 04:14:16 PM


Like this one?


I am disrespectful to dirt!

(http://i6.photobucket.com/albums/y246/hafftrak/MrSparkle.gif)

Can you see that I am serious?

More like these  :zoinks: :

(http://i38.tinypic.com/2wp0x3m.gif)

(http://i35.tinypic.com/fbc4me.gif)

Although this one was just cute:

(http://i33.tinypic.com/24q8v48.gif)

Title: Re: Bint! WTF Were You Thinking?
Post by: odeon on November 02, 2009, 04:16:56 PM
Although I don't see why you're so angry, we post porn in threads visible to everyone all the time.  It's not like the nasty stuff is solely contained in the hidden forums.

We do? I don't think so but I could have missed some of it cos I don't think about it all the time. Fuck, I don't WANT to think about such things all the time. To be perfectly honest, I'm fucking sick and tired of trying to make sure that we dodge that kind of thing. I'm sick and tried of trying to herd adults so they can behave like ten-year-olds.

If you post porn in a thread in, say, Free for All, and it's ten pages back, it's a lot less likely to be discovered than an arse with a bottle sticking out of it right up there in the newsbox. How difficult is that to understand?
Title: Re: Bint! WTF Were You Thinking?
Post by: earthboundmisfit on November 02, 2009, 04:18:05 PM


(http://www.pianomahnn.com/images/seizure2.gif)
Title: Re: Bint! WTF Were You Thinking?
Post by: earthboundmisfit on November 02, 2009, 04:18:30 PM


(http://www.caffein8ed.com/fazed_stuff/ani_orbital-artifact_sm.gif)
Title: Re: Bint! WTF Were You Thinking?
Post by: earthboundmisfit on November 02, 2009, 04:18:55 PM


(http://pics.ohlawd.net/img/seizure.gif)
Title: Re: Bint! WTF Were You Thinking?
Post by: Christopher McCandless on November 02, 2009, 04:19:03 PM
Odeon - calm down. I wouldn't like to think about what would happen if I reacted to disobediance in such a fashion.
Title: Re: Bint! WTF Were You Thinking?
Post by: Celticgoddess on November 02, 2009, 04:23:04 PM
You guys are going to give odeon another migraine and then he's so going to kick ur collective asses. Preferrably not with a bottle shoved up where the sun don't shine. :P
Title: Re: Bint! WTF Were You Thinking?
Post by: Blasted on November 02, 2009, 04:24:43 PM
Although I don't see why you're so angry, we post porn in threads visible to everyone all the time.  It's not like the nasty stuff is solely contained in the hidden forums.

We do? I don't think so but I could have missed some of it cos I don't think about it all the time. Fuck, I don't WANT to think about such things all the time. To be perfectly honest, I'm fucking sick and tired of trying to make sure that we dodge that kind of thing. I'm sick and tried of trying to herd adults so they can behave like ten-year-olds.

If you post porn in a thread in, say, Free for All, and it's ten pages back, it's a lot less likely to be discovered than an arse with a bottle sticking out of it right up there in the newsbox. How difficult is that to understand?

But the newsbox can be hidden along with the user info.  The top bar doesn't have to be visible to anyone who doesn't want to see the newsbox.

I think you're over-reacting and are starting to be a bit paranoid about being "discovered".  We know you finance this forum and have a reason to worry about such things but this forum is 18+, the porn I had up there was mild stuff and done in good humour.  It's not like I had babies being fucked by donkeys  ::)
Title: Re: Bint! WTF Were You Thinking?
Post by: odeon on November 02, 2009, 04:25:30 PM
Odeon - calm down. I wouldn't like to think about what would happen if I reacted to disobediance in such a fashion.

Then again, you don't have to think about any of these things, you can simply go on posting anything you like. It's the nature of this board and any board like it. You think it's all a given but it's not. It's a pipe dream but the illusion is a really nice one.
Title: Re: Bint! WTF Were You Thinking?
Post by: Blasted on November 02, 2009, 04:25:51 PM
EBM you rule  :green:
Title: Re: Bint! WTF Were You Thinking?
Post by: earthboundmisfit on November 02, 2009, 04:30:51 PM


i gave myself a migraine.   :(   stupid crt monitor.


i need to go lay down for a while.
Title: Re: Bint! WTF Were You Thinking?
Post by: Christopher McCandless on November 02, 2009, 04:34:53 PM
Odeon - calm down. I wouldn't like to think about what would happen if I reacted to disobediance in such a fashion.

Then again, you don't have to think about any of these things, you can simply go on posting anything you like. It's the nature of this board and any board like it. You think it's all a given but it's not. It's a pipe dream but the illusion is a really nice one.
Odeon, I have responsibilities irl you know, and if I dealt with them the way you just reacted, I think I would be in a pretty big mess. A cool style is always more effective, trust me it too me a long time to learn it, but it was worth it.

Plus, I could get into a wee bit of trouble if this site went down for those reasons too - for one I am accessing this site over my universities connection.
Title: Re: Bint! WTF Were You Thinking?
Post by: Celticgoddess on November 02, 2009, 04:38:43 PM


i gave myself a migraine.   :(   stupid crt monitor.

I've been looking for hot pics of Tera Patrick and now I've got a raging hard on


i need to go lay down for a while and have a personal moment....or three

Fixed. :green:
Title: Re: Bint! WTF Were You Thinking?
Post by: Scrapheap on November 02, 2009, 04:39:47 PM
FFS there's much more important things to talk about! I just posted a porno poll you all need to vote in. :razz:  :laugh:
Title: Re: Bint! WTF Were You Thinking?
Post by: odeon on November 02, 2009, 04:43:06 PM
Although I don't see why you're so angry, we post porn in threads visible to everyone all the time.  It's not like the nasty stuff is solely contained in the hidden forums.

We do? I don't think so but I could have missed some of it cos I don't think about it all the time. Fuck, I don't WANT to think about such things all the time. To be perfectly honest, I'm fucking sick and tired of trying to make sure that we dodge that kind of thing. I'm sick and tried of trying to herd adults so they can behave like ten-year-olds.

If you post porn in a thread in, say, Free for All, and it's ten pages back, it's a lot less likely to be discovered than an arse with a bottle sticking out of it right up there in the newsbox. How difficult is that to understand?

But the newsbox can be hidden along with the user info.  The top bar doesn't have to be visible to anyone who doesn't want to see the newsbox.

I think you're over-reacting and are starting to be a bit paranoid about being "discovered".  We know you finance this forum and have a reason to worry about such things but this forum is 18+, the porn I had up there was mild stuff and done in good humour.  It's not like I had babies being fucked by donkeys  ::)

But the newsbox is NOT hidden, it's in plain view. It can be hidden, yes, but it is not hidden now. That's the whole bloody point.

Personally, I think the stuff you had up there was indeed mild. It was done in good humour, yes, and I understand why you did it. Problem is, what I think won't count if our host has a look and decides it's easier to shut us down (because they can do that, it's right there in the TOS) than try to settle things with someone who is pissed off and pays fifty times the amount I pay each month. I don't mind the money, Bint, I never did, but I do want to keep us online. To do that, I follow a few very simple rules, one of which is that I make sure we keep a low profile to the outside world, simply because that way we don't ever have to be scrutinised.

Rules are always easier if you don't make a lot of exceptions because once you start doing that, it becomes harder to enforce anything without someone screaming how UNFAIR it all is and how what we denied now was allowed last month, and what a despot I am, and all that shit and drama some people are so fond of.

See, the rules are only designed to do one thing, one thing only, and that is to ensure that this place stays online.

Don't like it? Tough. It's not your choice.
Title: Re: Bint! WTF Were You Thinking?
Post by: odeon on November 02, 2009, 04:46:33 PM
Odeon - calm down. I wouldn't like to think about what would happen if I reacted to disobediance in such a fashion.

Then again, you don't have to think about any of these things, you can simply go on posting anything you like. It's the nature of this board and any board like it. You think it's all a given but it's not. It's a pipe dream but the illusion is a really nice one.
Odeon, I have responsibilities irl you know, and if I dealt with them the way you just reacted, I think I would be in a pretty big mess. A cool style is always more effective, trust me it too me a long time to learn it, but it was worth it.

No, i don't know you have any responsibilities, hadron. Here you NEVER indicate that you have any, or that you're capable of handling them. Sorry, but that's the way you come off. Now, you may think that you come off as some kind of cool and mysterious future aspie leader, but that's just not the case. You're just another spazz, like the rest of us. In time you'll get some experience but right now your lack of it is showing.


Quote
Plus, I could get into a wee bit of trouble if this site went down for those reasons too - for one I am accessing this site over my universities connection.

Then WTF are you arguing about?
Title: Re: Bint! WTF Were You Thinking?
Post by: Blasted on November 02, 2009, 04:59:22 PM
Although I don't see why you're so angry, we post porn in threads visible to everyone all the time.  It's not like the nasty stuff is solely contained in the hidden forums.

We do? I don't think so but I could have missed some of it cos I don't think about it all the time. Fuck, I don't WANT to think about such things all the time. To be perfectly honest, I'm fucking sick and tired of trying to make sure that we dodge that kind of thing. I'm sick and tried of trying to herd adults so they can behave like ten-year-olds.

If you post porn in a thread in, say, Free for All, and it's ten pages back, it's a lot less likely to be discovered than an arse with a bottle sticking out of it right up there in the newsbox. How difficult is that to understand?

But the newsbox can be hidden along with the user info.  The top bar doesn't have to be visible to anyone who doesn't want to see the newsbox.

I think you're over-reacting and are starting to be a bit paranoid about being "discovered".  We know you finance this forum and have a reason to worry about such things but this forum is 18+, the porn I had up there was mild stuff and done in good humour.  It's not like I had babies being fucked by donkeys  ::)

But the newsbox is NOT hidden, it's in plain view. It can be hidden, yes, but it is not hidden now. That's the whole bloody point.

Personally, I think the stuff you had up there was indeed mild. It was done in good humour, yes, and I understand why you did it. Problem is, what I think won't count if our host has a look and decides it's easier to shut us down (because they can do that, it's right there in the TOS) than try to settle things with someone who is pissed off and pays fifty times the amount I pay each month. I don't mind the money, Bint, I never did, but I do want to keep us online. To do that, I follow a few very simple rules, one of which is that I make sure we keep a low profile to the outside world, simply because that way we don't ever have to be scrutinised.

Rules are always easier if you don't make a lot of exceptions because once you start doing that, it becomes harder to enforce anything without someone screaming how UNFAIR it all is and how what we denied now was allowed last month, and what a despot I am, and all that shit and drama some people are so fond of.

See, the rules are only designed to do one thing, one thing only, and that is to ensure that this place stays online.

Don't like it? Tough. It's not your choice.

What I still don't understand is why do you think a bit of porn would get us shut down?  Surely the agreement you have with our host states that we can have porn.  Also I think we'd all benefit if you would post the TOS for us all to see again.

I would understand all the secrecy and worry if we had a paedophilic forum or one which worshipped Hitler and had us making plans for another mass extermination BUT all we have is a forum for autistic people that sometimes write about controversial things and post the odd porn film or pic.

Sometimes you really should loosen up a bit you know.  I'm not saying what I did was right but it didn't deserve such a huge reaction from you.
Title: Re: Bint! WTF Were You Thinking?
Post by: Christopher McCandless on November 02, 2009, 05:08:51 PM
Odeon - calm down. I wouldn't like to think about what would happen if I reacted to disobediance in such a fashion.

Then again, you don't have to think about any of these things, you can simply go on posting anything you like. It's the nature of this board and any board like it. You think it's all a given but it's not. It's a pipe dream but the illusion is a really nice one.
Odeon, I have responsibilities irl you know, and if I dealt with them the way you just reacted, I think I would be in a pretty big mess. A cool style is always more effective, trust me it too me a long time to learn it, but it was worth it.

No, i don't know you have any responsibilities, hadron. Here you NEVER indicate that you have any, or that you're capable of handling them. Sorry, but that's the way you come off. Now, you may think that you come off as some kind of cool and mysterious future aspie leader, but that's just not the case. You're just another spazz, like the rest of us. In time you'll get some experience but right now your lack of it is showing.
:laugh:

Just shows what you know then really. Given some of the stuff I am busy arranging disabled rights wise in my uni, just as a vaguely trivial example, I am further up the ladder in that respect. Mind, I don't fancy being an aspie leader - would rather delegate that problem to someone else.

But no leader can survive without keeping his cool - one lesson you seem intent on not learning.
Quote
Plus, I could get into a wee bit of trouble if this site went down for those reasons too - for one I am accessing this site over my universities connection.

Then WTF are you arguing about?
[/quote]
Because I have some confidence in my abilities to deal with shit if it happens. We live in a world with some risk, live with it.
Title: Re: Bint! WTF Were You Thinking?
Post by: Celticgoddess on November 02, 2009, 05:14:38 PM
What I don't think people realize is that it takes nearly nothing to have the site shut down. It's shut down first, ask questions later, if they even bother to really ask or care. The ex has his own computer company so this is what we do day to day and I can back Odeon up on what he's saying. I know he doesn't need me too, but being in this business for 10+ years I know what he's getting at.

Carry on.
Title: Re: Bint! WTF Were You Thinking?
Post by: Blasted on November 02, 2009, 05:18:12 PM
I did say to you all that having me as a newsbox bitch was a bad idea  :(
Title: Re: Bint! WTF Were You Thinking?
Post by: Christopher McCandless on November 02, 2009, 05:19:25 PM
What I don't think people realize is that it takes nearly nothing to have the site shut down. It's shut down first, ask questions later, if they even bother to really ask or care. The ex has his own computer company so this is what we do day to day and I can back Odeon up on what he's saying. I know he doesn't need me too, but being in this business for 10+ years I know what he's getting at.

Carry on.
It doesn't take too much to restore the site from a backup, elsewhere either. Antagonising the membership with this callout does nothing to protect this site. If Odeon dealt with this in a more adult fashion (anyone thought of PM's - asides Camilla did hint rather strongly she did not want to be doing the newsbox etc...), the risk to the site would be greatly reduced.
Title: Re: Bint! WTF Were You Thinking?
Post by: Celticgoddess on November 02, 2009, 05:35:05 PM
I did say to you all that having me as a newsbox bitch was a bad idea  :(

No, you were an awesome newsbox bitch which is what we've been telling you since you started. but this isn't just about the newsbox bitch stuff. You have a hard time truly believing people when they compliment you. You see it as pressure to live up to something and your lack of self confidence kicks you in the ass every time. It's too bad that you can't see yourself in the light that others do. There are things that you are genuinely good at and a little more belief in self would take you far. :hug:
Title: Re: Bint! WTF Were You Thinking?
Post by: Celticgoddess on November 02, 2009, 05:39:49 PM
What I don't think people realize is that it takes nearly nothing to have the site shut down. It's shut down first, ask questions later, if they even bother to really ask or care. The ex has his own computer company so this is what we do day to day and I can back Odeon up on what he's saying. I know he doesn't need me too, but being in this business for 10+ years I know what he's getting at.

Carry on.
It doesn't take too much to restore the site from a backup, elsewhere either. Antagonising the membership with this callout does nothing to protect this site. If Odeon dealt with this in a more adult fashion (anyone thought of PM's - asides Camilla did hint rather strongly she did not want to be doing the newsbox etc...), the risk to the site would be greatly reduced.

Then what is the callout board for? It's for this purpose. Odeon had an issue, he called Bints out on it, she had a chance to respond. It doesn't put the site at risk. If anything, it probably helped the situation because if someone watching the server it's stored on flagged the site, they would see that the issue was dealt with.

of course you can restore from backups but why put us in that position to begin with? (not directing this specifically to Bints, I mean in general). What we have here works. There are few rules that are being asked of us. I don't see what the huge deal is to follow those rules.
Title: Re: Bint! WTF Were You Thinking?
Post by: Christopher McCandless on November 02, 2009, 05:41:47 PM
What I don't think people realize is that it takes nearly nothing to have the site shut down. It's shut down first, ask questions later, if they even bother to really ask or care. The ex has his own computer company so this is what we do day to day and I can back Odeon up on what he's saying. I know he doesn't need me too, but being in this business for 10+ years I know what he's getting at.

Carry on.
It doesn't take too much to restore the site from a backup, elsewhere either. Antagonising the membership with this callout does nothing to protect this site. If Odeon dealt with this in a more adult fashion (anyone thought of PM's - asides Camilla did hint rather strongly she did not want to be doing the newsbox etc...), the risk to the site would be greatly reduced.

Then what is the callout board for? It's for this purpose. Odeon had an issue, he called Bints out on it, she had a chance to respond. It doesn't put the site at risk. If anything, it probably helped the situation because if someone watching the server it's stored on flagged the site, they would see that the issue was dealt with.

of course you can restore from backups but why put us in that position to begin with? (not directing this specifically to Bints, I mean in general). What we have here works. There are few rules that are being asked of us. I don't see what the huge deal is to follow those rules.
Sometimes having the show costs more than dealing with things quitely. All Odeon's approach does is encourage more people to behave in a similar fashion - that is where the problem lies. Having a clear and quickly enforced TOS is more than enough to ensure the sites survivability. Hosts normally give a warning before taking action.
Title: Re: Bint! WTF Were You Thinking?
Post by: ProfessorFarnsworth on November 02, 2009, 06:20:05 PM
Sometimes having the show costs more than dealing with things quitely. All Odeon's approach does is encourage more people to behave in a similar fashion - that is where the problem lies. Having a clear and quickly enforced TOS is more than enough to ensure the sites survivability. Hosts normally give a warning before taking action.

True. But I suppose the danger lies mostly with the fact, that a disgruntled user could exploit the TOS violation to retaliate against this site.
Title: Re: Bint! WTF Were You Thinking?
Post by: Scrapheap on November 02, 2009, 06:52:28 PM
POOPIE FACE!! POOPIE FACE!! BINTY IS A POOPIE FACE!!
Title: Re: Bint! WTF Were You Thinking?
Post by: earthboundmisfit on November 02, 2009, 06:54:50 PM


neener neener!    :razz:
Title: Re: Bint! WTF Were You Thinking?
Post by: Christopher McCandless on November 02, 2009, 06:56:38 PM
Sometimes having the show costs more than dealing with things quitely. All Odeon's approach does is encourage more people to behave in a similar fashion - that is where the problem lies. Having a clear and quickly enforced TOS is more than enough to ensure the sites survivability. Hosts normally give a warning before taking action.

True. But I suppose the danger lies mostly with the fact, that a disgruntled user could exploit the TOS violation to retaliate against this site.
In which case, Odeon is only encouraging them to do so.
Title: Re: Bint! WTF Were You Thinking?
Post by: Scrapheap on November 02, 2009, 07:00:59 PM


neener neener!    :razz:

EBM likes boogers!!  :happydance:
Title: Re: Bint! WTF Were You Thinking?
Post by: earthboundmisfit on November 02, 2009, 07:04:13 PM


how did you know?  no uh!
Title: Re: Bint! WTF Were You Thinking?
Post by: Celticgoddess on November 02, 2009, 07:04:47 PM
*wonders why she told someone today that she likes going to her forums because it's the only adult conversation she has all day*

:lol:
Title: Re: Bint! WTF Were You Thinking?
Post by: Celticgoddess on November 02, 2009, 07:05:45 PM


how did you know?  no uh!

I am so not horny right now :P

:laugh:
Title: Re: Bint! WTF Were You Thinking?
Post by: earthboundmisfit on November 02, 2009, 07:08:17 PM


g


how did you know?  no uh!

I am so not horny right now :P

:laugh:


ewwww girl cooties!
Title: Re: Bint! WTF Were You Thinking?
Post by: P7PSP on November 02, 2009, 07:13:56 PM


how did you know?  no uh!

I am so not horny right now :P

:laugh:
He'll brush his teeth before kissing you. I mean I've heard he does that.  :-[
Title: Re: Bint! WTF Were You Thinking?
Post by: Al Swearegen on November 02, 2009, 07:39:17 PM
It doesn't really strike me as unreasonable that Odeon is pissed off.

I have seen it happen on other forums and it is a pain in the arse for the forum owner to then make a case to a forum host to allow him to keep his site and no-one but him will be allowed to be a part in the process. The will scrutinise the sites entirety and judge it one way or another and he would have to really go through a lot of unnecessary sycophantic begging and scraping - IF he can be bothered and IF they do end up NOT deciding it is not too much bother to keep the site.

Call him overly cautious or butthurt or whatever but what he is saying is dead to right.

He pays for the site and he will personally cop it if crap goes down. Us? Will will be inconvenienced if the site goes down and we then blame who?
I suspect we would all be blaming....Odeon for not getting the site back up.

Hadron carping on about all manner of weird shit is expected and I suspect would have had equal backing if Pyraxis was here because they like to take a contrary point of view.

It is pretty easy though and we enjoy this site and want it to enjoy and if that means posting the occasion porn where only trusted members can see it and otherwise leaving the rest of the board free only to non-porn it doesn't seem unreasonable.

If Odeon did not have these restrictions forced on his site because of the TOS he probably would not have said anything. I don't think he is prudish (or has ever struck me as so).

I think this site is unmoderated and free enough and have only been on a couple of sites with looser moderation and believe me they have a lot harder time in keeping their sites up. One of them is after a hell of a lot of investigation on their third host in 12 months for precisely this kind of thing and even AFF was bought down by Timelord after he merely insinuated irrelevant crap.

Don't understand the resistance here to appreciate this.
Title: Re: Bint! WTF Were You Thinking?
Post by: Blasted on November 02, 2009, 07:40:28 PM
Why must you always write such chunks of texts?

I'mnot arsed to argue about this all now.
Title: Re: Bint! WTF Were You Thinking?
Post by: Al Swearegen on November 02, 2009, 07:50:14 PM
Why must you always write such chunks of texts?

I'mnot arsed to argue about this all now.

That is the way I write. Part of my charm.  :zoinks:

For what it is worth. I am not saying you are a bad person. Nor am I saying you are stupid for what you did. I think in this instance you were ignorant of the TOS and did something for laughs or whatever and did not think to consider maybe it may impact on TOS.

I am sure Odeon knows the TOS inside out and most of us don't. You may not have understood the implications and others may not. Having said this. If he does know them well and we don't then arguing with him about them seems as rational as arguing in other field or discipline of knowledge where you are short of facts and up against someone who knows them inside out. Just seems to set up a a big FAIL.

I kinda think Odeon did the board a favour in point it out. I think most of us want the site running.
Title: Re: Bint! WTF Were You Thinking?
Post by: Blasted on November 02, 2009, 08:02:45 PM
The TOS this the TOS that - SHOW IT TO ME THE FUCKING TOS.  I will scrutinize it and see if I'm in the wrong or you are just a twatty , paranoid buntch.

I'm starting to get sick of this place quitle frankly.  Have been for a whilem but the few people on here whom I like a lot keep me from doing a Lit.  Not to mention I need the human interaction from time to time especially with lack o decent people around me in this stupid city
Title: Re: Bint! WTF Were You Thinking?
Post by: Al Swearegen on November 02, 2009, 08:11:35 PM
The TOS this the TOS that - SHOW IT TO ME THE FUCKING TOS.  I will scrutinize it and see if I'm in the wrong or you are just a twatty , paranoid buntch.

I'm starting to get sick of this place quitle frankly.  Have been for a whilem but the few people on here whom I like a lot keep me from doing a Lit.  Not to mention I need the human interaction from time to time especially with lack o decent people around me in this stupid city


You seem to be a little cranky there over something Bint.
You want to look at the terms and conditions? That is OK. You can find them.
You are unhappy with this place, that is unfortunate.
You want to "do a Lit". We can't stop you.
You are in a stupid city? Me too. Sometimes we are tied to a location by things we can't distance ourselves from.

Or have I completely misread how you wanted the above to come across to us?
Title: Re: Bint! WTF Were You Thinking?
Post by: Blasted on November 02, 2009, 08:19:47 PM
Sorry  Itook to many of m sleepy meds so I havig i hadr to wrie anything legilgfble.  And I feel al swoed down; So sorry :( Its awesome though, jus  floating a bout with finers ressing te iright thngs sometimes.  I love life right niw, and the schwoooose!

Sorry off off top.  U guys figure all ths out whether binty has een a naught naghty one while I go pee.  I just hoe I wnt fall down the stars :( Am a bit uneve n on my feet :P
Title: Re: Bint! WTF Were You Thinking?
Post by: Adam on November 02, 2009, 08:23:06 PM
wow what are you all moaning about fucking hell

i haven't been to the toilet in over 30 hours

THIRTY HOURS!!!

how is that even possible?
Title: Re: Bint! WTF Were You Thinking?
Post by: earthboundmisfit on November 02, 2009, 08:23:37 PM


I don't think that is normal
Title: Re: Bint! WTF Were You Thinking?
Post by: Alex179 on November 02, 2009, 08:23:55 PM
wow what are you all moaning about fucking hell

i haven't been to the toilet in over 30 hours

THIRTY HOURS!!!

how is that even possible?
You might want to see a doctor about that.
Title: Re: Bint! WTF Were You Thinking?
Post by: Al Swearegen on November 02, 2009, 08:28:08 PM
Moaning? I saw discussion? Potatoes/Potartoes.

Good luck with that stairs thing Bint.

Good luck with the crapping thing Soph. (Eat something greasy washed down with prune juice. Then see a doctor)
Title: Re: Bint! WTF Were You Thinking?
Post by: Adam on November 02, 2009, 08:29:57 PM
the crapping thing? i meant peeing  :P

i dont see what the big deal is really

and she did say she didnt wanna be the newsbox thing anymore to be fair
Title: Re: Bint! WTF Were You Thinking?
Post by: Blasted on November 02, 2009, 08:34:11 PM
I posed dirty awful porn y pics in the newnox thread  :grrr:

Odeo had a fit.  Binty sad.

Haha one was of a whoman shoving a Lucosade bootle up her twat  :green:
Title: Re: Bint! WTF Were You Thinking?
Post by: Al Swearegen on November 02, 2009, 08:35:42 PM
the crapping thing? i meant peeing  :P

i dont see what the big deal is really

and she did say she didnt wanna be the newsbox thing anymore to be fair

Oh OK. My bad. May be dehydrated. Drink more water.
Title: Re: Bint! WTF Were You Thinking?
Post by: earthboundmisfit on November 02, 2009, 08:36:50 PM


That may have a lot to do with being itchy, your body is dehydrated.
Title: Re: Bint! WTF Were You Thinking?
Post by: Al Swearegen on November 02, 2009, 09:19:54 PM
I posed dirty awful porn y pics in the newnox thread  :grrr:

Odeo had a fit.  Binty sad.

Haha one was of a whoman shoving a Lucosade bootle up her twat  :green:

Did Odeon have a fit or was he pissed of that the site could be bought down by posting porn in places that non-members could see it? That was my reading of what he was saying. Is that NOT how you read it? Did he have any point or was he just having a fit for the fun of it? (Not really like Odeon to just have "fits" is it? ;) )
Title: Re: Bint! WTF Were You Thinking?
Post by: Adam on November 02, 2009, 09:25:04 PM
1. i didnt know we werent allowed to post porn where non members could see it

2. its not like theres someone from hostgator lurking on this site 24/7, what are the chances it wou.d have done anything?

3. she did say she didnt wanna be noozbox bitch anymore
Title: Re: Bint! WTF Were You Thinking?
Post by: Al Swearegen on November 02, 2009, 09:38:36 PM
1. i didnt know we werent allowed to post porn where non members could see it

2. its not like theres someone from hostgator lurking on this site 24/7, what are the chances it wou.d have done anything?

3. she did say she didnt wanna be noozbox bitch anymore

Most of us don't know the boundaries of what we are and are not allowed. Odeon does and pointed it out in this thread. I commented this exact thing earlier.

Yes we doesn't know when hostgator might lurk do we. We don't know what action they would take or when. If they did take action, what would Bint, you or I do (or be able to do) about it? It would be far more than lolz or an "Oooopppsss" moment and certainly much more for Odeon.

Yes she did and she unknowingly potentially threatened the site in her protest. I am not sure what any of these statements have to do with Odeon responding to Bint the way he has?
Title: Re: Bint! WTF Were You Thinking?
Post by: Blasted on November 02, 2009, 10:14:08 PM
Oh fuuck you all up the arse with a big fat cruxific  :thumbup:

Title: Re: Bint! WTF Were You Thinking?
Post by: Scrapheap on November 02, 2009, 10:34:23 PM
Oh fuuck you all up the arse with a big fat cruxific  :thumbup:



Only if you dip it in honey an cinnamon first.  :eyelash:
Title: Re: Bint! WTF Were You Thinking?
Post by: Scrapheap on November 03, 2009, 02:13:11 AM
Why must you always write such chunks of texts?

I'mnot arsed to argue about this all now.

Well then, answer MY charges. You're a poopie face!! :razz:
Title: Re: Bint! WTF Were You Thinking?
Post by: odeon on November 03, 2009, 02:38:23 AM
I did say to you all that having me as a newsbox bitch was a bad idea  :(

No, you did an excellent job.
Title: Re: Bint! WTF Were You Thinking?
Post by: odeon on November 03, 2009, 02:43:16 AM
What I don't think people realize is that it takes nearly nothing to have the site shut down. It's shut down first, ask questions later, if they even bother to really ask or care. The ex has his own computer company so this is what we do day to day and I can back Odeon up on what he's saying. I know he doesn't need me too, but being in this business for 10+ years I know what he's getting at.

Carry on.
It doesn't take too much to restore the site from a backup, elsewhere either. Antagonising the membership with this callout does nothing to protect this site. If Odeon dealt with this in a more adult fashion (anyone thought of PM's - asides Camilla did hint rather strongly she did not want to be doing the newsbox etc...), the risk to the site would be greatly reduced.

:finger:

The point it, I don't want to be forced to restore the site elsewhere. I don't want to have to find another host. It's my fucking server space and I pay for it.

Tell you what: you start your own board and run it the way you see fit.

And what's this shit about "antagonising the membership with a callout"? I'm not allowed to call people out because I own the fucking site?
Title: Re: Bint! WTF Were You Thinking?
Post by: odeon on November 03, 2009, 02:45:55 AM
What I don't think people realize is that it takes nearly nothing to have the site shut down. It's shut down first, ask questions later, if they even bother to really ask or care. The ex has his own computer company so this is what we do day to day and I can back Odeon up on what he's saying. I know he doesn't need me too, but being in this business for 10+ years I know what he's getting at.

Carry on.
It doesn't take too much to restore the site from a backup, elsewhere either. Antagonising the membership with this callout does nothing to protect this site. If Odeon dealt with this in a more adult fashion (anyone thought of PM's - asides Camilla did hint rather strongly she did not want to be doing the newsbox etc...), the risk to the site would be greatly reduced.

Then what is the callout board for? It's for this purpose. Odeon had an issue, he called Bints out on it, she had a chance to respond. It doesn't put the site at risk. If anything, it probably helped the situation because if someone watching the server it's stored on flagged the site, they would see that the issue was dealt with.

of course you can restore from backups but why put us in that position to begin with? (not directing this specifically to Bints, I mean in general). What we have here works. There are few rules that are being asked of us. I don't see what the huge deal is to follow those rules.
Sometimes having the show costs more than dealing with things quitely. All Odeon's approach does is encourage more people to behave in a similar fashion - that is where the problem lies. Having a clear and quickly enforced TOS is more than enough to ensure the sites survivability. Hosts normally give a warning before taking action.

Google is your friend.
Title: Re: Bint! WTF Were You Thinking?
Post by: odeon on November 03, 2009, 02:48:32 AM
Sometimes having the show costs more than dealing with things quitely. All Odeon's approach does is encourage more people to behave in a similar fashion - that is where the problem lies. Having a clear and quickly enforced TOS is more than enough to ensure the sites survivability. Hosts normally give a warning before taking action.

True. But I suppose the danger lies mostly with the fact, that a disgruntled user could exploit the TOS violation to retaliate against this site.
In which case, Odeon is only encouraging them to do so.

It's always a risk, Hadron. If you'd had any experience with this sort of thing you'd know that.

And again: Why should I be the only one here who is not allowed to call someone out when I'm pissed off?
Title: Re: Bint! WTF Were You Thinking?
Post by: odeon on November 03, 2009, 03:00:46 AM
The TOS this the TOS that - SHOW IT TO ME THE FUCKING TOS.  I will scrutinize it and see if I'm in the wrong or you are just a twatty , paranoid buntch.

I'm starting to get sick of this place quitle frankly.  Have been for a whilem but the few people on here whom I like a lot keep me from doing a Lit.  Not to mention I need the human interaction from time to time especially with lack o decent people around me in this stupid city


The TOS is readily available at Hostgator's webpage and I've linked to it often enough, I feel. Google is your friend.

But this is not about the TOS, specifically, it's about staying below the radar because we don't want our host to scrutinise the whole site. There's enough shit in here to cause us problems, in spite of it all being perfectly within the TOS. Hosts have been known to shut down inconvenient sites BEFORE ever contacting the owner and Hostgator is not an exception in that respect. The reason I've elected to stay with them is that they are relatively liberal, their servers tend to stay online and be relatively fast, and they are not too expensive. Also, they do tolerate a lot of stuff others won't.

I2 started elsewhere, you know, but was forced to move because the original host didn't allow porn.

I don't want you to leave, Bint. I like reading your stuff and I2 wouldn't be the same without you. But ultimately it's your decision and if you want to leave because of all this, then so be it.
Title: Re: Bint! WTF Were You Thinking?
Post by: odeon on November 03, 2009, 03:04:04 AM
1. i didnt know we werent allowed to post porn where non members could see it

Sorry if that's not been explicit enough. Why do you think there is an 18-yo limit?

Quote
2. its not like theres someone from hostgator lurking on this site 24/7, what are the chances it wou.d have done anything?

Hard to say but it's been known to happen. Also, it only takes one pissed-off former member. It happened with I2's original host, afaik.

Quote
3. she did say she didnt wanna be noozbox bitch anymore

Fair enough, but I think the staff interpreted it as we could talk her into it again. She did a great job, you know.
Title: Re: Bint! WTF Were You Thinking?
Post by: Adam on November 03, 2009, 04:11:34 AM
i understand the 18yr old limit

but there are plenty of sites out there where porn is visible without logging in

if porn should only be in the members only sections, then why arent 17 yr olds allowed to post in Free for All etc?
Title: Re: Bint! WTF Were You Thinking?
Post by: Christopher McCandless on November 03, 2009, 07:27:13 AM
Sometimes having the show costs more than dealing with things quitely. All Odeon's approach does is encourage more people to behave in a similar fashion - that is where the problem lies. Having a clear and quickly enforced TOS is more than enough to ensure the sites survivability. Hosts normally give a warning before taking action.

True. But I suppose the danger lies mostly with the fact, that a disgruntled user could exploit the TOS violation to retaliate against this site.
In which case, Odeon is only encouraging them to do so.

It's always a risk, Hadron. If you'd had any experience with this sort of thing you'd know that.

And again: Why should I be the only one here who is not allowed to call someone out when I'm pissed off?

You can call them out - just that it would do the site a lot of good if you were diplomatic about these kind of things. Now the next person to get disenfranchised with this place knows exactly what to do...
Title: Re: Bint! WTF Were You Thinking?
Post by: Scrapheap on November 03, 2009, 10:41:42 AM
i understand the 18yr old limit

but there are plenty of sites out there where porn is visible without logging in

if porn should only be in the members only sections, then why arent 17 yr olds allowed to post in Free for All etc?

You have a good point here.
Title: Re: Bint! WTF Were You Thinking?
Post by: odeon on November 03, 2009, 01:25:15 PM
i understand the 18yr old limit

but there are plenty of sites out there where porn is visible without logging in

if porn should only be in the members only sections, then why arent 17 yr olds allowed to post in Free for All etc?

Good point. The answer is that Free for All was free for everyone, including non-members, before we were repeatedly attacked and we had to limit the availability of that forum to members. We've never considered opening up any part of the board for minors, however, so allowing them to register is out of the question.
Title: Re: Bint! WTF Were You Thinking?
Post by: odeon on November 03, 2009, 01:27:31 PM
Sometimes having the show costs more than dealing with things quitely. All Odeon's approach does is encourage more people to behave in a similar fashion - that is where the problem lies. Having a clear and quickly enforced TOS is more than enough to ensure the sites survivability. Hosts normally give a warning before taking action.

True. But I suppose the danger lies mostly with the fact, that a disgruntled user could exploit the TOS violation to retaliate against this site.
In which case, Odeon is only encouraging them to do so.

It's always a risk, Hadron. If you'd had any experience with this sort of thing you'd know that.

And again: Why should I be the only one here who is not allowed to call someone out when I'm pissed off?

You can call them out - just that it would do the site a lot of good if you were diplomatic about these kind of things. Now the next person to get disenfranchised with this place knows exactly what to do...

Post nudes in the newsbox?

Hadron, it would do this site a lot of good if you'd kindly shut the fuck up when your only input seems to be to disagree with me, no matter what.
Title: Re: Bint! WTF Were You Thinking?
Post by: Christopher McCandless on November 03, 2009, 08:30:07 PM
Sometimes having the show costs more than dealing with things quitely. All Odeon's approach does is encourage more people to behave in a similar fashion - that is where the problem lies. Having a clear and quickly enforced TOS is more than enough to ensure the sites survivability. Hosts normally give a warning before taking action.

True. But I suppose the danger lies mostly with the fact, that a disgruntled user could exploit the TOS violation to retaliate against this site.
In which case, Odeon is only encouraging them to do so.

It's always a risk, Hadron. If you'd had any experience with this sort of thing you'd know that.

And again: Why should I be the only one here who is not allowed to call someone out when I'm pissed off?

You can call them out - just that it would do the site a lot of good if you were diplomatic about these kind of things. Now the next person to get disenfranchised with this place knows exactly what to do...

Post nudes in the newsbox?

Hadron, it would do this site a lot of good if you'd kindly shut the fuck up when your only input seems to be to disagree with me, no matter what.
Something on those lines, yes. But you really do show yourself up as easy to antagonise.
Title: Re: Bint! WTF Were You Thinking?
Post by: 'andersom' on November 04, 2009, 04:25:18 AM
Sometimes having the show costs more than dealing with things quitely. All Odeon's approach does is encourage more people to behave in a similar fashion - that is where the problem lies. Having a clear and quickly enforced TOS is more than enough to ensure the sites survivability. Hosts normally give a warning before taking action.

True. But I suppose the danger lies mostly with the fact, that a disgruntled user could exploit the TOS violation to retaliate against this site.
In which case, Odeon is only encouraging them to do so.

It's always a risk, Hadron. If you'd had any experience with this sort of thing you'd know that.

And again: Why should I be the only one here who is not allowed to call someone out when I'm pissed off?

You can call them out - just that it would do the site a lot of good if you were diplomatic about these kind of things. Now the next person to get disenfranchised with this place knows exactly what to do...

Post nudes in the newsbox?

Hadron, it would do this site a lot of good if you'd kindly shut the fuck up when your only input seems to be to disagree with me, no matter what.
Something on those lines, yes. But you really do show yourself up as easy to antagonise.

LOL Hadron, Some self-reflective moments would not hurt you.

Title: Re: Bint! WTF Were You Thinking?
Post by: odeon on November 04, 2009, 08:39:32 AM
Sometimes having the show costs more than dealing with things quitely. All Odeon's approach does is encourage more people to behave in a similar fashion - that is where the problem lies. Having a clear and quickly enforced TOS is more than enough to ensure the sites survivability. Hosts normally give a warning before taking action.

True. But I suppose the danger lies mostly with the fact, that a disgruntled user could exploit the TOS violation to retaliate against this site.
In which case, Odeon is only encouraging them to do so.

It's always a risk, Hadron. If you'd had any experience with this sort of thing you'd know that.

And again: Why should I be the only one here who is not allowed to call someone out when I'm pissed off?

You can call them out - just that it would do the site a lot of good if you were diplomatic about these kind of things. Now the next person to get disenfranchised with this place knows exactly what to do...

Post nudes in the newsbox?

Hadron, it would do this site a lot of good if you'd kindly shut the fuck up when your only input seems to be to disagree with me, no matter what.
Something on those lines, yes. But you really do show yourself up as easy to antagonise.

::)

You really are ignorant, aren't you?
Title: Re: Bint! WTF Were You Thinking?
Post by: Christopher McCandless on November 04, 2009, 08:43:04 AM
Sometimes having the show costs more than dealing with things quitely. All Odeon's approach does is encourage more people to behave in a similar fashion - that is where the problem lies. Having a clear and quickly enforced TOS is more than enough to ensure the sites survivability. Hosts normally give a warning before taking action.

True. But I suppose the danger lies mostly with the fact, that a disgruntled user could exploit the TOS violation to retaliate against this site.
In which case, Odeon is only encouraging them to do so.

It's always a risk, Hadron. If you'd had any experience with this sort of thing you'd know that.

And again: Why should I be the only one here who is not allowed to call someone out when I'm pissed off?

You can call them out - just that it would do the site a lot of good if you were diplomatic about these kind of things. Now the next person to get disenfranchised with this place knows exactly what to do...

Post nudes in the newsbox?

Hadron, it would do this site a lot of good if you'd kindly shut the fuck up when your only input seems to be to disagree with me, no matter what.
Something on those lines, yes. But you really do show yourself up as easy to antagonise.

::)

You really are ignorant, aren't you?
It is true - face it. You need to learn to keep your cool rather than exploding over small pranks. This site has had far worse in the past. Lighten up.
Title: Re: Bint! WTF Were You Thinking?
Post by: odeon on November 04, 2009, 09:01:28 AM
While you obviously have the right to your opinion--even the more moronic ones--you'll simply have to live with the fact that this site is not run according to your ideas. Not now, not ever.
Title: Re: Bint! WTF Were You Thinking?
Post by: Scrapheap on November 04, 2009, 12:49:09 PM
Sometimes having the show costs more than dealing with things quitely. All Odeon's approach does is encourage more people to behave in a similar fashion - that is where the problem lies. Having a clear and quickly enforced TOS is more than enough to ensure the sites survivability. Hosts normally give a warning before taking action.

True. But I suppose the danger lies mostly with the fact, that a disgruntled user could exploit the TOS violation to retaliate against this site.
In which case, Odeon is only encouraging them to do so.

It's always a risk, Hadron. If you'd had any experience with this sort of thing you'd know that.

And again: Why should I be the only one here who is not allowed to call someone out when I'm pissed off?

You can call them out - just that it would do the site a lot of good if you were diplomatic about these kind of things. Now the next person to get disenfranchised with this place knows exactly what to do...

Post nudes in the newsbox?

Hadron, it would do this site a lot of good if you'd kindly shut the fuck up when your only input seems to be to disagree with me, no matter what.

I like turtles!!  :green:
Title: Re: Bint! WTF Were You Thinking?
Post by: Christopher McCandless on November 04, 2009, 12:56:52 PM
While you obviously have the right to your opinion--even the more moronic ones--you'll simply have to live with the fact that this site is not run according to your ideas. Not now, not ever.

Some people have left because of your ideas - bear that in mind.
Title: Re: Bint! WTF Were You Thinking?
Post by: odeon on November 04, 2009, 01:07:06 PM
While you obviously have the right to your opinion--even the more moronic ones--you'll simply have to live with the fact that this site is not run according to your ideas. Not now, not ever.

Some people have left because of your ideas - bear that in mind.

I guess they just weren't intense enough. :zoinks:
Title: Re: Bint! WTF Were You Thinking?
Post by: punkdrew on November 05, 2009, 04:53:18 AM
Sometimes having the show costs more than dealing with things quitely. All Odeon's approach does is encourage more people to behave in a similar fashion - that is where the problem lies. Having a clear and quickly enforced TOS is more than enough to ensure the sites survivability. Hosts normally give a warning before taking action.

True. But I suppose the danger lies mostly with the fact, that a disgruntled user could exploit the TOS violation to retaliate against this site.
In which case, Odeon is only encouraging them to do so.

It's always a risk, Hadron. If you'd had any experience with this sort of thing you'd know that.

And again: Why should I be the only one here who is not allowed to call someone out when I'm pissed off?

You can call them out - just that it would do the site a lot of good if you were diplomatic about these kind of things. Now the next person to get disenfranchised with this place knows exactly what to do...

Post nudes in the newsbox?

Hadron, it would do this site a lot of good if you'd kindly shut the fuck up when your only input seems to be to disagree with me, no matter what.
Something on those lines, yes. But you really do show yourself up as easy to antagonise.

::)

You really are ignorant, aren't you?
It is true - face it. You need to learn to keep your cool rather than exploding over small pranks. This site has had far worse in the past. Lighten up.

A prank that could get I2 kicked off Hostgator is not small. You need to check your facts, Hadron.
Title: Re: Bint! WTF Were You Thinking?
Post by: punkdrew on November 05, 2009, 04:54:27 AM
While you obviously have the right to your opinion--even the more moronic ones--you'll simply have to live with the fact that this site is not run according to your ideas. Not now, not ever.

Some people have left because of your ideas - bear that in mind.

Oh--you mean those wankers who got their panties in a twist because they couldn't do whatever they wanted to on someone else's dime? Baw.
Title: Re: Bint! WTF Were You Thinking?
Post by: punkdrew on November 05, 2009, 04:56:20 AM
While you obviously have the right to your opinion--even the more moronic ones--you'll simply have to live with the fact that this site is not run according to your ideas. Not now, not ever.

Some people have left because of your ideas - bear that in mind.

No one's stopping you from starting your own board. Good luck finding a site that will allow people to post pics of anal fisting and bestiality.
Title: Re: Bint! WTF Were You Thinking?
Post by: Al Swearegen on November 05, 2009, 05:12:06 AM
Sometimes having the show costs more than dealing with things quitely. All Odeon's approach does is encourage more people to behave in a similar fashion - that is where the problem lies. Having a clear and quickly enforced TOS is more than enough to ensure the sites survivability. Hosts normally give a warning before taking action.

True. But I suppose the danger lies mostly with the fact, that a disgruntled user could exploit the TOS violation to retaliate against this site.
In which case, Odeon is only encouraging them to do so.

It's always a risk, Hadron. If you'd had any experience with this sort of thing you'd know that.

And again: Why should I be the only one here who is not allowed to call someone out when I'm pissed off?

You can call them out - just that it would do the site a lot of good if you were diplomatic about these kind of things. Now the next person to get disenfranchised with this place knows exactly what to do...

Post nudes in the newsbox?

Hadron, it would do this site a lot of good if you'd kindly shut the fuck up when your only input seems to be to disagree with me, no matter what.
Something on those lines, yes. But you really do show yourself up as easy to antagonise.

::)

You really are ignorant, aren't you?
It is true - face it. You need to learn to keep your cool rather than exploding over small pranks. This site has had far worse in the past. Lighten up.

I am just wondering abstractly, if this site WAS closed down because Odeon did not react and "kept his cool", who would you be having this conversation with and/or what would you be doing by way of congratulating Odeon for not being so "petty".
Title: Re: Bint! WTF Were You Thinking?
Post by: odeon on November 05, 2009, 06:04:09 AM
Sometimes having the show costs more than dealing with things quitely. All Odeon's approach does is encourage more people to behave in a similar fashion - that is where the problem lies. Having a clear and quickly enforced TOS is more than enough to ensure the sites survivability. Hosts normally give a warning before taking action.

True. But I suppose the danger lies mostly with the fact, that a disgruntled user could exploit the TOS violation to retaliate against this site.
In which case, Odeon is only encouraging them to do so.

It's always a risk, Hadron. If you'd had any experience with this sort of thing you'd know that.

And again: Why should I be the only one here who is not allowed to call someone out when I'm pissed off?

You can call them out - just that it would do the site a lot of good if you were diplomatic about these kind of things. Now the next person to get disenfranchised with this place knows exactly what to do...

Post nudes in the newsbox?

Hadron, it would do this site a lot of good if you'd kindly shut the fuck up when your only input seems to be to disagree with me, no matter what.
Something on those lines, yes. But you really do show yourself up as easy to antagonise.

::)

You really are ignorant, aren't you?
It is true - face it. You need to learn to keep your cool rather than exploding over small pranks. This site has had far worse in the past. Lighten up.

I am just wondering abstractly, if this site WAS closed down because Odeon did not react and "kept his cool", who would you be having this conversation with and/or what would you be doing by way of congratulating Odeon for not being so "petty".

He'd put in a good word for me elsewhere. :zoinks:
Title: Re: Bint! WTF Were You Thinking?
Post by: Al Swearegen on November 05, 2009, 06:41:25 AM
Sometimes having the show costs more than dealing with things quitely. All Odeon's approach does is encourage more people to behave in a similar fashion - that is where the problem lies. Having a clear and quickly enforced TOS is more than enough to ensure the sites survivability. Hosts normally give a warning before taking action.

True. But I suppose the danger lies mostly with the fact, that a disgruntled user could exploit the TOS violation to retaliate against this site.
In which case, Odeon is only encouraging them to do so.

It's always a risk, Hadron. If you'd had any experience with this sort of thing you'd know that.

And again: Why should I be the only one here who is not allowed to call someone out when I'm pissed off?

You can call them out - just that it would do the site a lot of good if you were diplomatic about these kind of things. Now the next person to get disenfranchised with this place knows exactly what to do...

Post nudes in the newsbox?

Hadron, it would do this site a lot of good if you'd kindly shut the fuck up when your only input seems to be to disagree with me, no matter what.
Something on those lines, yes. But you really do show yourself up as easy to antagonise.

::)

You really are ignorant, aren't you?
It is true - face it. You need to learn to keep your cool rather than exploding over small pranks. This site has had far worse in the past. Lighten up.

I am just wondering abstractly, if this site WAS closed down because Odeon did not react and "kept his cool", who would you be having this conversation with and/or what would you be doing by way of congratulating Odeon for not being so "petty".

He'd put in a good word for me elsewhere. :zoinks:

That sounds both fair and comforting. What a top bloke.  :zoinks:
Title: Re: Bint! WTF Were You Thinking?
Post by: El on November 05, 2009, 08:35:43 AM
I like turtles!!  :green:
Me too, but strictly platonically.
Title: Re: Bint! WTF Were You Thinking?
Post by: Adam on November 05, 2009, 10:41:55 AM
i have a tortoise and we've never had sex
Title: Re: Bint! WTF Were You Thinking?
Post by: odeon on November 05, 2009, 11:23:09 AM
Good thing, that. They drop their looks so quickly afterwards. :P
Title: Re: Bint! WTF Were You Thinking?
Post by: Celticgoddess on November 05, 2009, 11:26:01 AM
:lol:
Title: Re: Bint! WTF Were You Thinking?
Post by: earthboundmisfit on November 05, 2009, 08:49:44 PM


I miss Binty.   :(
Title: Re: Bint! WTF Were You Thinking?
Post by: El on November 05, 2009, 09:39:09 PM
Good thing, that. They drop their looks so quickly afterwards. :P
I thought they did that slowly, just like they do everything else.
Title: Re: Bint! WTF Were You Thinking?
Post by: Scrapheap on November 05, 2009, 11:16:58 PM
I like turtles!!  :green:
Me too, but strictly platonically.

Had a bad relationship??
Title: Re: Bint! WTF Were You Thinking?
Post by: Blasted on November 06, 2009, 08:28:46 AM
Wtf, i never had pics of anal fisting or bestiality in there, just 2 anorexics fucking, a lucozade bottle up a twat and a lemon in the arse :zoinks: one more i think but ive forgotten. I dont think this place is 'intense' tbh, it might have been in past
Title: Re: Bint! WTF Were You Thinking?
Post by: punkdrew on November 06, 2009, 11:46:10 AM
Wtf, i never had pics of anal fisting or bestiality in there, just 2 anorexics fucking, a lucozade bottle up a twat and a lemon in the arse :zoinks: one more i think but ive forgotten. I dont think this place is 'intense' tbh, it might have been in past

I was just speaking in generalities, love.
What do you find lacking in intensity here?
Title: Re: Bint! WTF Were You Thinking?
Post by: Lemon Aguilera on November 06, 2009, 11:53:45 AM
the fact ya can't post porn.
Title: Re: Bint! WTF Were You Thinking?
Post by: Lemon Aguilera on November 06, 2009, 12:04:48 PM
I posed dirty awful porn y pics in the newnox thread  :grrr:

Odeo had a fit.  Binty sad.

Haha one was of a whoman shoving a Lucosade bootle up her twat  :green:

what drugs are you taking?
Title: Re: Bint! WTF Were You Thinking?
Post by: Adam on November 06, 2009, 04:18:44 PM
she was drugged up on sleeping pills iirc
Title: Re: Bint! WTF Were You Thinking?
Post by: Blasted on November 07, 2009, 02:19:43 PM
^Yeah.  Jeez, I did write a load of shit
Title: Re: Bint! WTF Were You Thinking?
Post by: Yuri Bezmenov on October 04, 2017, 08:54:04 PM
she was drugged up on sleeping pills iirc

Typical of a BPD.   :M