INTENSITY²

Politics, Mature and taboo => Political Pundits => Topic started by: Tom/Mutate on August 14, 2007, 01:28:46 AM

Title: CALLED DAWKIN'S BLUFF!
Post by: Tom/Mutate on August 14, 2007, 01:28:46 AM
I went to a seminar last night where Dawkins was reading from his book.   All the way through, Christians were tearing ofF their crosses and beads and throwing them away while Dawkins cheered then for seeing reason.  However, I jUSt sat through it with a smug smile on my face, waiting to drop my bomb that would defeat him utterley for the last time.

Al the end of the talk I stood up and said, " so basically you deny God from lack of evidence."  he said "yes".

I said "I have no evidence of your thoughts, do I?  So how do I know you have a brain???"

He just stood there, quivering.  Then he fell to his knees and started crying, "God forgive me, what have I done, I have sinned, what have I done".
Then he crawled away on his hands and knees dripping tears on the stage,  while everyone applauded me.  Then I led them to the nearest church.
Title: Re: CALLED DAWKIN'S BLUFF!
Post by: Kosmonaut on August 14, 2007, 02:37:01 AM
that's marvelous news.
im going to have some cornflakes in a minute.
Title: Re: CALLED DAWKIN'S BLUFF!
Post by: Lucifer on August 14, 2007, 02:38:22 AM
:laugh:

dawkins thinks he's god anyway.  ::)  he's become a little too fervent, if not frothing at the brain, for my liking, in recent years. 

a bit of a fundamentalist, you might say.  :laugh:
Title: Re: CALLED DAWKIN'S BLUFF!
Post by: The_P on August 14, 2007, 02:41:56 AM
Are we talking about that Oxford professor, who hosted a documentary on C4 last night, where society continues to cling on to superstition rather than scientific fact?

(http://users.ox.ac.uk/~dawkins/richard.jpg)

Title: Re: CALLED DAWKIN'S BLUFF!
Post by: Lucifer on August 14, 2007, 03:28:53 AM
yep.  that's him.
Title: Re: CALLED DAWKIN'S BLUFF!
Post by: The_P on August 14, 2007, 03:32:59 AM
yep.  that's him.

I wouldn't be surprised that you had the pleasure of meeting him in person.

Can't say I entirely dislike the guy, seeing as science hasn't been taken seriously in schools for 25 years or something.
Title: Re: CALLED DAWKIN'S BLUFF!
Post by: Kosmonaut on August 14, 2007, 03:51:42 AM
I missed it, i may have watched it if i had known it was on.
I find his books seriously boring though.
Title: Re: CALLED DAWKIN'S BLUFF!
Post by: Lucifer on August 14, 2007, 03:53:04 AM
yep.  i lost the will to live about halfway through "the selfish gene" about a million years ago (or whenever it was published).  ::)

he just smacks a bit too much of the crusader, for my tastes.
Title: Re: CALLED DAWKIN'S BLUFF!
Post by: The_P on August 14, 2007, 04:36:24 AM
I missed it, i may have watched it if i had known it was on.
I find his books seriously boring though.

It will be on next week, I think. He's presenting a series.

Anyway, must dash to Whitchurch today. Toodles.
Title: Re: CALLED DAWKIN'S BLUFF!
Post by: Kosmonaut on August 14, 2007, 04:50:33 AM
Enjoy
Title: Re: CALLED DAWKIN'S BLUFF!
Post by: Kosmonaut on August 14, 2007, 04:54:08 AM
yep.  i lost the will to live about halfway through "the selfish gene" about a million years ago (or whenever it was published).  ::)

he just smacks a bit too much of the crusader, for my tastes.

I gave up on that, and i gave up on the god delusion.
First book of his i read was 'climbing mount improbable' ( or something like that), i managed to finish it with some skimming.
I just don't like his style, drones on and on and on...
Title: Re: CALLED DAWKIN'S BLUFF!
Post by: Christopher McCandless on August 14, 2007, 10:37:35 AM
yep.  that's him.

I wouldn't be surprised that you had the pleasure of meeting him in person.

Can't say I entirely dislike the guy, seeing as science hasn't been taken seriously in schools for 25 years or something.
His problem is he acts as if atheism is a religion. His website reminds me of the scientolgy one, except L Ron Hubbard is replaced with dear Dawkins himself: http://richarddawkins.net/
Title: Re: CALLED DAWKIN'S BLUFF!
Post by: Kosmonaut on August 14, 2007, 10:45:10 AM
yep.  that's him.

I wouldn't be surprised that you had the pleasure of meeting him in person.

Can't say I entirely dislike the guy, seeing as science hasn't been taken seriously in schools for 25 years or something.
His problem is he acts as if atheism is a religion
He's not an actor.
Title: Re: CALLED DAWKIN'S BLUFF!
Post by: Christopher McCandless on August 14, 2007, 10:49:30 AM
yep.  that's him.

I wouldn't be surprised that you had the pleasure of meeting him in person.

Can't say I entirely dislike the guy, seeing as science hasn't been taken seriously in schools for 25 years or something.
His problem is he acts as if atheism is a religion
He's not an actor.
He wants to be. He certianly has the inflated ego.
Title: Re: CALLED DAWKIN'S BLUFF!
Post by: Soph on August 14, 2007, 11:16:46 AM
He certianly has the inflated ego.
So do you.
Title: Re: CALLED DAWKIN'S BLUFF!
Post by: Christopher McCandless on August 14, 2007, 11:18:22 AM
He certianly has the inflated ego.
So do you.
Not on his level, but yes I do have it.  Anyway, i would mind some parts of being an actor, it would be a good way of escapism.
Title: Re: CALLED DAWKIN'S BLUFF!
Post by: Kosmonaut on August 14, 2007, 11:29:10 AM
yep.  that's him.

I wouldn't be surprised that you had the pleasure of meeting him in person.

Can't say I entirely dislike the guy, seeing as science hasn't been taken seriously in schools for 25 years or something.
His problem is he acts as if atheism is a religion
He's not an actor.
He wants to be. He certianly has the inflated ego.
I assume you have never met Mr Dawkins, have read none of his books, attended none of his lectures, and know nothing about actors.
please continue with the lesson...
 ::)
Title: Re: CALLED DAWKIN'S BLUFF!
Post by: Christopher McCandless on August 14, 2007, 11:33:55 AM
yep.  that's him.

I wouldn't be surprised that you had the pleasure of meeting him in person.

Can't say I entirely dislike the guy, seeing as science hasn't been taken seriously in schools for 25 years or something.
His problem is he acts as if atheism is a religion
He's not an actor.
He wants to be. He certianly has the inflated ego.
I assume you have never met Mr Dawkins, have read none of his books, attended none of his lectures, and know nothing about actors.
please continue with the lesson...
 ::)

I have done some reading up on articles by people who have read his books, and skimmed a few of his myself. His website really says all though, it so reminded me of scientology. As for his ego, having quotes of yourself in the style of a religious leader says it all really. As for the acting one, I have met people in it properly (I went to the BBC, but that is another story), albeit about 7 years ago. Stop defending the guy because he is at Oxford, I disliked him long before that.
Title: Re: CALLED DAWKIN'S BLUFF!
Post by: Tom/Mutate on August 14, 2007, 11:35:46 AM
Ironically, I have not really met "Dork"ins, but I have met uber-creationist Ken Ham.
Title: Re: CALLED DAWKIN'S BLUFF!
Post by: Kosmonaut on August 14, 2007, 11:43:39 AM
yep.  that's him.

I wouldn't be surprised that you had the pleasure of meeting him in person.

Can't say I entirely dislike the guy, seeing as science hasn't been taken seriously in schools for 25 years or something.
His problem is he acts as if atheism is a religion
He's not an actor.
He wants to be. He certianly has the inflated ego.
I assume you have never met Mr Dawkins, have read none of his books, attended none of his lectures, and know nothing about actors.
please continue with the lesson...
 ::)

Stop defending the guy because he is at Oxford, I disliked him long before that.
Thanks for the clarification regarding my assumptions.
Your assumptions are incorrect and illogical, don't drag me into your cry-baby i-falied-to-get-in-oxford-because-my-daddy-is-not-rich routine.
( BTW your parents have more money than mine did when i passed the entrance exam. So  :STFU: )
Title: Re: CALLED DAWKIN'S BLUFF!
Post by: Christopher McCandless on August 14, 2007, 11:45:25 AM
yep.  that's him.

I wouldn't be surprised that you had the pleasure of meeting him in person.

Can't say I entirely dislike the guy, seeing as science hasn't been taken seriously in schools for 25 years or something.
His problem is he acts as if atheism is a religion
He's not an actor.
He wants to be. He certianly has the inflated ego.
I assume you have never met Mr Dawkins, have read none of his books, attended none of his lectures, and know nothing about actors.
please continue with the lesson...
 ::)

Stop defending the guy because he is at Oxford, I disliked him long before that.
Thanks for the clarification regarding my assumptions.
Your assumptions are incorrect and illogical, don't drag me into your cry-baby i-falied-to-get-in-oxford-because-my-daddy-is-not-rich routine.
( BTW your parents have more money than mine did when i passed the entrance exam. So  :STFU: )

You seem to pop up and defend anything that seems to come from Oxford. As for how much money my parents have, you are making assumptions too.
Title: Re: CALLED DAWKIN'S BLUFF!
Post by: Kosmonaut on August 14, 2007, 12:07:48 PM
yep.  that's him.

I wouldn't be surprised that you had the pleasure of meeting him in person.

Can't say I entirely dislike the guy, seeing as science hasn't been taken seriously in schools for 25 years or something.
His problem is he acts as if atheism is a religion
He's not an actor.
He wants to be. He certianly has the inflated ego.
I assume you have never met Mr Dawkins, have read none of his books, attended none of his lectures, and know nothing about actors.
please continue with the lesson...
 ::)

Stop defending the guy because he is at Oxford, I disliked him long before that.
Thanks for the clarification regarding my assumptions.
Your assumptions are incorrect and illogical, don't drag me into your cry-baby i-falied-to-get-in-oxford-because-my-daddy-is-not-rich routine.
( BTW your parents have more money than mine did when i passed the entrance exam. So  :STFU: )

You seem to pop up and defend anything that seems to come from Oxford. As for how much money my parents have, you are making assumptions too.
You think i even knew where Mr Dawkins resides.
You're a fucking idiot son. And your mummy and daddy pays for your broadband. There's my assumptions.
Title: Re: CALLED DAWKIN'S BLUFF!
Post by: The_P on August 14, 2007, 12:11:27 PM
"Peaguy" synonymous with "eeediot", now? Bah, at least I can spell, unlike a certain little hard-on larking about around here. :p
Title: Re: CALLED DAWKIN'S BLUFF!
Post by: Christopher McCandless on August 14, 2007, 12:15:24 PM
yep.  that's him.

I wouldn't be surprised that you had the pleasure of meeting him in person.

Can't say I entirely dislike the guy, seeing as science hasn't been taken seriously in schools for 25 years or something.
His problem is he acts as if atheism is a religion
He's not an actor.
He wants to be. He certianly has the inflated ego.
I assume you have never met Mr Dawkins, have read none of his books, attended none of his lectures, and know nothing about actors.
please continue with the lesson...
 ::)

Stop defending the guy because he is at Oxford, I disliked him long before that.
Thanks for the clarification regarding my assumptions.
Your assumptions are incorrect and illogical, don't drag me into your cry-baby i-falied-to-get-in-oxford-because-my-daddy-is-not-rich routine.
( BTW your parents have more money than mine did when i passed the entrance exam. So  :STFU: )

You seem to pop up and defend anything that seems to come from Oxford. As for how much money my parents have, you are making assumptions too.
You think i even knew where Mr Dawkins resides.
You're a fucking peaguy son. And your mummy and daddy pays for your broadband. There's my assumptions.
I made the tincy assumption that you had read Peeguy's post earlier on in the thread yes. Surely you are not going to say that it is an unreasonable one. As for the ones on me, put it like this, I am getting some grant money for university. I see no need to go into anymore detail with you.
Title: Re: CALLED DAWKIN'S BLUFF!
Post by: Kosmonaut on August 14, 2007, 12:16:20 PM
yep.  that's him.

I wouldn't be surprised that you had the pleasure of meeting him in person.

Can't say I entirely dislike the guy, seeing as science hasn't been taken seriously in schools for 25 years or something.
His problem is he acts as if atheism is a religion
He's not an actor.
He wants to be. He certianly has the inflated ego.
I assume you have never met Mr Dawkins, have read none of his books, attended none of his lectures, and know nothing about actors.
please continue with the lesson...
 ::)

Stop defending the guy because he is at Oxford, I disliked him long before that.
Thanks for the clarification regarding my assumptions.
Your assumptions are incorrect and illogical, don't drag me into your cry-baby i-falied-to-get-in-oxford-because-my-daddy-is-not-rich routine.
( BTW your parents have more money than mine did when i passed the entrance exam. So  :STFU: )

You seem to pop up and defend anything that seems to come from Oxford. As for how much money my parents have, you are making assumptions too.
You think i even knew where Mr Dawkins resides.
You're a fucking peaguy son. And your mummy and daddy pays for your broadband. There's my assumptions.
I made the tincy assumption that you had read Peeguy's post earlier on in the thread yes. Surely you are not going to say that it is an unreasonable one. As for the ones on me, put it like this, I am getting some grant money for university. I see no need to go into anymore detail with you.
:pwned:
Title: Re: CALLED DAWKIN'S BLUFF!
Post by: The_P on August 14, 2007, 12:28:26 PM
I really don't understand all this uni bollocks, but it's fucking funny when Hardon's getting his piss ripped out of him by various members. ;D
Title: Re: CALLED DAWKIN'S BLUFF!
Post by: Christopher McCandless on August 14, 2007, 12:31:54 PM
I really don't understand all this uni bollocks, but it's fucking funny when Hardon's getting his piss ripped of him by various members. ;D
Its an ego contest between institutions really, its about who is academically the best. Most of it is superficial and meaningless, and about league tables (oxford gets an inflated score by having a massive asset base in its libraries, even if much of that is the buildings and first editions of books that are not really used by anyone, otherwise cambridge would beat it).
Title: Re: CALLED DAWKIN'S BLUFF!
Post by: The_P on August 14, 2007, 12:33:44 PM
I'm more interested in the pursuit of knowledge than to play an ego contest with some other associates from a university.

Hypothesis.
Title: Re: CALLED DAWKIN'S BLUFF!
Post by: Christopher McCandless on August 14, 2007, 12:35:59 PM
I'm more interested in the pursuit of knowledge than to play an ego contest with some other associates from a university.

Hypothesis.
So am I. But people have their egos unfortuantly, and I am as guilty (if not more so) as those academics.
Title: Re: CALLED DAWKIN'S BLUFF!
Post by: Kosmonaut on August 14, 2007, 12:43:26 PM
I'm more interested in the pursuit of knowledge than to play an ego contest with some other associates from a university.

Hypothesis.
So am I. But people have their egos unfortuantly, and I am as guilty (if not more so) as those academics.
It's all in your head son.
Title: Re: CALLED DAWKIN'S BLUFF!
Post by: The_P on August 14, 2007, 12:45:57 PM
I'm more interested in the pursuit of knowledge than to play an ego contest with some other associates from a university.

Hypothesis.
So am I. But people have their egos unfortuantly, and I am as guilty (if not more so) as those academics.
It's all in your head son.

On me 'ead, son. On me 'ead.
Title: Re: CALLED DAWKIN'S BLUFF!
Post by: Christopher McCandless on August 14, 2007, 01:32:51 PM
I'm more interested in the pursuit of knowledge than to play an ego contest with some other associates from a university.

Hypothesis.
So am I. But people have their egos unfortuantly, and I am as guilty (if not more so) as those academics.
It's all in your head son.
Which bit, acadmemics having egos or myself having one?
Title: Re: CALLED DAWKIN'S BLUFF!
Post by: Kosmonaut on August 14, 2007, 01:40:15 PM
you probably wont find this relevant, but anyway...


[attachment deleted by admin]
Title: Re: CALLED DAWKIN'S BLUFF!
Post by: Christopher McCandless on August 14, 2007, 01:44:23 PM
you probably wont find this relevant, but anyway...

:LMAO:
Now I would like an animated one of them...  :P
Title: Re: CALLED DAWKIN'S BLUFF!
Post by: Lucifer on August 14, 2007, 02:21:09 PM
your "grant" money (and there's actually no such thing anymore, btw) is SDA (Student Disability Allowance) though, isn't it?  that's not means tested.
Title: Re: CALLED DAWKIN'S BLUFF!
Post by: Christopher McCandless on August 14, 2007, 02:27:27 PM
your "grant" money (and there's actually no such thing anymore, btw) is SDA (Student Disability Allowance) though, isn't it?  that's not means tested.
The DSA I havent even applied for. The grant money I am talking about is the Durham Grant, and the one the government provides (if your household income is below a certain threshold, the government pays you). Plus I get DLA as well still. It adds up to a more than comfortable amount to live off, the only thing I have to do is take out a loan for the tuition fees, the rest will go into a bank and get me a decent amount of intrest for the 3-4 years.
Title: Re: CALLED DAWKIN'S BLUFF!
Post by: Lucifer on August 14, 2007, 02:29:18 PM
well, undoubtedly, cos you won't be spending it on books, as you have wiki, or socialising.
Title: Re: CALLED DAWKIN'S BLUFF!
Post by: Christopher McCandless on August 14, 2007, 02:32:55 PM
well, undoubtedly, cos you won't be spending it on books, as you have wiki, or socialising.
DSA will cover some of my books I believe (among other things), when I get around to applying. Given that everything is subsided, 6-7k is more than enough to live off very comfortably. Anyway the uni library will have plenty of reading material. I am intending to have a damn good social life as well, despite being an aspie.
Title: Re: CALLED DAWKIN'S BLUFF!
Post by: Lucifer on August 14, 2007, 02:34:31 PM
don't bank on it.  you have to have people who want your company for socialising.
Title: Re: CALLED DAWKIN'S BLUFF!
Post by: DirtDawg on August 14, 2007, 02:49:01 PM
don't bank on it.  you have to have people who want your company for socialising.

That has always held me up a bit.
I'm kind of useful as a result of some of my talents, but once things are accomplished ... --- ...
Title: Re: CALLED DAWKIN'S BLUFF!
Post by: Christopher McCandless on August 14, 2007, 02:52:03 PM
don't bank on it.  you have to have people who want your company for socialising.
Sorted that out partially already. If I get into Durham I will hopefully have people there that would do so already (dependant on if they hit their grades too). I am sure I will find plenty of people.
Title: Re: CALLED DAWKIN'S BLUFF!
Post by: Lucifer on August 14, 2007, 02:53:52 PM
i'm sure you will, too.  and then lose them again, as they leg it like bastards from your overwheening arrogance.

don't say i didn't warn you.
Title: Re: CALLED DAWKIN'S BLUFF!
Post by: Christopher McCandless on August 14, 2007, 02:56:07 PM
i'm sure you will, too.  and then lose them again, as they leg it like bastards from your overwheening arrogance.

don't say i didn't warn you.
Your making an assumption I act the same on an internet forum as real life. Far from it. There might be the occasional git that causes me problems socially, but i normally deal with them fast.
Title: Re: CALLED DAWKIN'S BLUFF!
Post by: Kosmonaut on August 14, 2007, 02:57:43 PM
I was a very social person at university; it seems like a different life.
Maybe it's because i had better drugs than most students.  ???
Title: Re: CALLED DAWKIN'S BLUFF!
Post by: Lucifer on August 14, 2007, 02:58:29 PM
i'm sure you will, too.  and then lose them again, as they leg it like bastards from your overwheening arrogance.

don't say i didn't warn you.
Your making an assumption I act the same on an internet forum as real life. Far from it. There might be the occasional git that causes me problems socially, but i normally deal with them fast.

"you're".

obviously i have to bow to your superior knowledge about making assumptions.  after all, you are a past master at same.
Title: Re: CALLED DAWKIN'S BLUFF!
Post by: Christopher McCandless on August 14, 2007, 03:00:32 PM
I was a very social person at university; it seems like a different life.
Maybe it's because i had better drugs than most students.  ???
Lol, i think i might stick with the alcohol. It should do my fine if I dont overdo it. I could ask flo for some herbology advice before I go though.  :P
Title: Re: CALLED DAWKIN'S BLUFF!
Post by: Christopher McCandless on August 14, 2007, 03:02:15 PM
i'm sure you will, too.  and then lose them again, as they leg it like bastards from your overwheening arrogance.

don't say i didn't warn you.
Your making an assumption I act the same on an internet forum as real life. Far from it. There might be the occasional git that causes me problems socially, but i normally deal with them fast.

"you're".

obviously i have to bow to your superior knowledge about making assumptions.  after all, you are a past master at same.
Lucifer I can type a grammatically correct post, it just takes twice as long while i go back and sort all the errors. Therefore I choose not to.
As for the assumptions, thank you for acknowledging my superiority.  :P
Title: Re: CALLED DAWKIN'S BLUFF!
Post by: Lucifer on August 14, 2007, 03:08:27 PM
best learn not to make the errors in the first place, then.  besides, i seem to recall you asked me to correct your posts.  do make up your mind.  after all i was doing you a favour, you ungrateful wretch.
Title: Re: CALLED DAWKIN'S BLUFF!
Post by: Christopher McCandless on August 14, 2007, 03:13:50 PM
best learn not to make the errors in the first place, then.  besides, i seem to recall you asked me to correct your posts.  do make up your mind.  after all i was doing you a favour, you ungrateful wretch.
No i said if you wanted to do them you could, I know its a habit of yours. But true I sort of asked you do it. And sometimes there are errors I miss, I blame my lousy english teacher...
Title: Re: CALLED DAWKIN'S BLUFF!
Post by: Lucifer on August 14, 2007, 03:15:39 PM
naturally,  it couldn't possibly be your responsibility, could it?  ::)

[/sarcasm]
Title: Re: CALLED DAWKIN'S BLUFF!
Post by: Thagomizer on August 16, 2007, 08:59:36 PM
I intensely dislike Richard Dawkins. I must have a certain animus for any scientist who thinks I'm an idiot for believing in God even if I happen to be fully behind his science. His anti-religion crusade is actually furthering the misconception that so many Americans seem to suffer from: that evolutionary biology is inimicable to monotheism. Considering that the appallingly high percentage of creationists in America has remained unchanged for more than 50 years, people like him are not helping to create a scientifically literate America.

He has, however, shown us how to write a best seller. Simply copy and paste the most childish rant from any atheism forum and repeat it for about 400 pages, and fans of Sam Harris and will hail it as "brilliant". 
Title: Re: CALLED DAWKIN'S BLUFF!
Post by: Tesla on August 23, 2007, 08:09:58 AM
I downloaded The God Delusion and am listening to it at work...  man what a pompous asshole.
Title: Re: CALLED DAWKIN'S BLUFF!
Post by: Walkie on August 23, 2007, 08:54:41 AM
I downloaded The God Delusion and am listening to it at work...  man what a pompous asshole.

  :clap: Agreed.

I was trying to think of an intelligent comment to add to this thread, but what the heck. Nobody else bothered, so why should I?
Anyway, your observation above, seems to sum it up, in a nutshell ;D

Title: Re: CALLED DAWKIN'S BLUFF!
Post by: Christopher McCandless on August 23, 2007, 09:42:23 AM
I downloaded The God Delusion and am listening to it at work...  man what a pompous asshole.
He is a proffessor at Awksfawd. Many of them are like that.
Title: Re: CALLED DAWKIN'S BLUFF!
Post by: Walkie on August 23, 2007, 09:50:13 AM
I downloaded The God Delusion and am listening to it at work...  man what a pompous asshole.
He is a proffessor at Awksfawd. Many of them are like that.
Oh, for crying out loud, Hadron. If that's your opinion of Oxford why the heck did you put it down as your first chioce?
Title: Re: CALLED DAWKIN'S BLUFF!
Post by: Kosmonaut on August 23, 2007, 09:53:39 AM
I downloaded The God Delusion and am listening to it at work...  man what a pompous asshole.
He is a proffessor at Awksfawd. Many of them are like that.
Well, at least it is a subject you may know something about.
Obviously, i mean being a pompous asshole, not about proffessors (sic).
Title: Re: CALLED DAWKIN'S BLUFF!
Post by: Christopher McCandless on August 23, 2007, 09:57:53 AM
I downloaded The God Delusion and am listening to it at work...  man what a pompous asshole.
He is a proffessor at Awksfawd. Many of them are like that.
Well, at least it is a subject you may know something about.
Obviously, i mean being a pompous asshole, not about proffessors (sic).
I think I would know about the latter, given I have spent 5 days at the place. Obviously there are the odd proffesors there that are nice, but some are just total wankers. Dawkins in particular.
Title: Re: CALLED DAWKIN'S BLUFF!
Post by: Christopher McCandless on August 23, 2007, 09:58:54 AM
I downloaded The God Delusion and am listening to it at work...  man what a pompous asshole.
He is a proffessor at Awksfawd. Many of them are like that.
Oh, for crying out loud, Hadron. If that's your opinion of Oxford why the heck did you put it down as your first chioce?
I wanted the doors opening that come with going to the place. And the ego boost.
Title: Re: CALLED DAWKIN'S BLUFF!
Post by: Kosmonaut on August 23, 2007, 09:59:00 AM
I downloaded The God Delusion and am listening to it at work...  man what a pompous asshole.
He is a proffessor at Awksfawd. Many of them are like that.
Well, at least it is a subject you may know something about.
Obviously, i mean being a pompous asshole, not about proffessors (sic).
I think I would know about the latter, given I have spent 5 days at the place. Obviously there are the odd proffesors there that are nice, but some are just total wankers. Dawkins in particular.
You spent a whole 5 days there, aren't you the lucky one !
Title: Re: CALLED DAWKIN'S BLUFF!
Post by: Tesla on August 23, 2007, 10:06:41 AM
I downloaded The God Delusion and am listening to it at work...  man what a pompous asshole.
He is a proffessor at Awksfawd. Many of them are like that.
Well, at least it is a subject you may know something about.
Obviously, i mean being a pompous asshole, not about proffessors (sic).
I think I would know about the latter, given I have spent 5 days at the place. Obviously there are the odd proffesors there that are nice, but some are just total wankers. Dawkins in particular.
You spent a whole 5 days there, aren't you the lucky one !

That's 0.076% of his life... surely that is long enough for him to come to a decisive conclusion about the place, and all the people in it.
Title: Re: CALLED DAWKIN'S BLUFF!
Post by: Christopher McCandless on August 23, 2007, 10:08:14 AM
I downloaded The God Delusion and am listening to it at work...  man what a pompous asshole.
He is a proffessor at Awksfawd. Many of them are like that.
Well, at least it is a subject you may know something about.
Obviously, i mean being a pompous asshole, not about proffessors (sic).
I think I would know about the latter, given I have spent 5 days at the place. Obviously there are the odd proffesors there that are nice, but some are just total wankers. Dawkins in particular.
You spent a whole 5 days there, aren't you the lucky one !

That's 0.076% of his life... surely that is long enough for him to come to a decisive conclusion about the place, and all the people in it.
Easily when the conclusion stares you in the face so much.
Title: Re: CALLED DAWKIN'S BLUFF!
Post by: Kosmonaut on August 23, 2007, 10:09:59 AM
I downloaded The God Delusion and am listening to it at work...  man what a pompous asshole.
He is a proffessor at Awksfawd. Many of them are like that.
Well, at least it is a subject you may know something about.
Obviously, i mean being a pompous asshole, not about proffessors (sic).
I think I would know about the latter, given I have spent 5 days at the place. Obviously there are the odd proffesors there that are nice, but some are just total wankers. Dawkins in particular.
You spent a whole 5 days there, aren't you the lucky one !

That's 0.076% of his life... surely that is long enough for him to come to a decisive conclusion about the place, and all the people in it.
Easily when the conclusion stares you in the face so much.
.. and tells you that you are a failure  :bigcry:
poor hardon
Title: Re: CALLED DAWKIN'S BLUFF!
Post by: Christopher McCandless on August 23, 2007, 10:10:45 AM
I downloaded The God Delusion and am listening to it at work...  man what a pompous asshole.
He is a proffessor at Awksfawd. Many of them are like that.
Well, at least it is a subject you may know something about.
Obviously, i mean being a pompous asshole, not about proffessors (sic).
I think I would know about the latter, given I have spent 5 days at the place. Obviously there are the odd proffesors there that are nice, but some are just total wankers. Dawkins in particular.
You spent a whole 5 days there, aren't you the lucky one !

That's 0.076% of his life... surely that is long enough for him to come to a decisive conclusion about the place, and all the people in it.
Easily when the conclusion stares you in the face so much.
.. and tells you that you are a failure  :bigcry:
poor hardon
I wouldnt see it that way. I think I got off rather lightly, given how much I would have hated the place if I had went for 3 years.
Title: Re: CALLED DAWKIN'S BLUFF!
Post by: Kosmonaut on August 23, 2007, 10:13:03 AM
I downloaded The God Delusion and am listening to it at work...  man what a pompous asshole.
He is a proffessor at Awksfawd. Many of them are like that.
Well, at least it is a subject you may know something about.
Obviously, i mean being a pompous asshole, not about proffessors (sic).
I think I would know about the latter, given I have spent 5 days at the place. Obviously there are the odd proffesors there that are nice, but some are just total wankers. Dawkins in particular.
You spent a whole 5 days there, aren't you the lucky one !

That's 0.076% of his life... surely that is long enough for him to come to a decisive conclusion about the place, and all the people in it.
Easily when the conclusion stares you in the face so much.
.. and tells you that you are a failure  :bigcry:
poor hardon
I wouldnt see it that way. I think I got off rather lightly, given how much I would have hated the place if I had went for 3 years.
yes keep saying that and eventually you may believe it.
Title: Re: CALLED DAWKIN'S BLUFF!
Post by: Christopher McCandless on August 23, 2007, 10:17:01 AM
I downloaded The God Delusion and am listening to it at work...  man what a pompous asshole.
He is a proffessor at Awksfawd. Many of them are like that.
Well, at least it is a subject you may know something about.
Obviously, i mean being a pompous asshole, not about proffessors (sic).
I think I would know about the latter, given I have spent 5 days at the place. Obviously there are the odd proffesors there that are nice, but some are just total wankers. Dawkins in particular.
You spent a whole 5 days there, aren't you the lucky one !

That's 0.076% of his life... surely that is long enough for him to come to a decisive conclusion about the place, and all the people in it.
Easily when the conclusion stares you in the face so much.
.. and tells you that you are a failure  :bigcry:
poor hardon
I wouldnt see it that way. I think I got off rather lightly, given how much I would have hated the place if I had went for 3 years.
yes keep saying that and eventually you may believe it.
Its not a matter of belief, its a matter of fact. Oxford values hard work over intelligence, where as I tend to be the other way around.
Title: Re: CALLED DAWKIN'S BLUFF!
Post by: Alex179 on August 23, 2007, 10:19:40 AM
So you just want to get by on your intelligence and not be challenged by hard work?
Title: Re: CALLED DAWKIN'S BLUFF!
Post by: Kosmonaut on August 23, 2007, 10:24:32 AM
Oxford values hard work over intelligence
:lol: Whatever gave you that idea ?
Title: Re: CALLED DAWKIN'S BLUFF!
Post by: Christopher McCandless on August 23, 2007, 12:18:32 PM
Oxford values hard work over intelligence
:lol: Whatever gave you that idea ?

The people who get in, and the idiots who were current students there when I went. They had no spark or anything.
Title: Re: CALLED DAWKIN'S BLUFF!
Post by: Christopher McCandless on August 23, 2007, 12:19:43 PM
So you just want to get by on your intelligence and not be challenged by hard work?
Intelligence should count for more. Oxford is full of the dim and highly educated that have peaked before they get there.
Title: Re: CALLED DAWKIN'S BLUFF!
Post by: The_P on August 23, 2007, 12:21:14 PM
Oxford values hard work over intelligence
:lol: Whatever gave you that idea ?

The people who get in, and the idiots who were current students there when I went. They had no spark or anything.

Thus sayeth the lord of the nerds.
Title: Re: CALLED DAWKIN'S BLUFF!
Post by: Christopher McCandless on August 23, 2007, 12:22:32 PM
Oxford values hard work over intelligence
:lol: Whatever gave you that idea ?

The people who get in, and the idiots who were current students there when I went. They had no spark or anything.

Thus sayeth the lord of the nerds.
I know the people who applied, and out of those who got in from my school, I would say one out of the four deserved to. The other 3 were dim but hard working snobs.
Title: Re: CALLED DAWKIN'S BLUFF!
Post by: Kosmonaut on August 23, 2007, 12:30:28 PM
There was a lot of other lazy bastards there when i went.
Title: Re: CALLED DAWKIN'S BLUFF!
Post by: Christopher McCandless on August 23, 2007, 12:33:19 PM
There was a lot of other lazy bastards there when i went.
All the people showing us around had a book stuffed up their nose, and were whining about how much work they had to do. Poor NT's and their lack of an eidetic memory...
Title: Re: CALLED DAWKIN'S BLUFF!
Post by: The_P on August 23, 2007, 12:34:31 PM
There was a lot of other lazy bastards there when i went.
All the people showing us around had a book stuffed up their nose, and were whining about how much work they had to do. Poor NT's and their lack of an eidetic memory...

And thus sayeth the lord... of sweet fuck-all.
Title: Re: CALLED DAWKIN'S BLUFF!
Post by: Christopher McCandless on August 23, 2007, 12:36:56 PM
There was a lot of other lazy bastards there when i went.
All the people showing us around had a book stuffed up their nose, and were whining about how much work they had to do. Poor NT's and their lack of an eidetic memory...

And thus sayeth the lord... of sweet fuck-all.
You dont think I might know my stuff just a little on this one.
Title: Re: CALLED DAWKIN'S BLUFF!
Post by: Kosmonaut on August 23, 2007, 12:40:40 PM
 :lol:
I would be whining too if i had to show a group of students around.
I was introduced to such a group once, it was a surprise attack. I was asked what i thought about the place, i said - don't come here it's shit.
Title: Re: CALLED DAWKIN'S BLUFF!
Post by: morthaur on August 23, 2007, 03:54:32 PM
I went to a seminar last night where Dawkins was reading from his book.   All the way through, Christians were tearing ofF their crosses and beads and throwing them away while Dawkins cheered then for seeing reason.  However, I jUSt sat through it with a smug smile on my face, waiting to drop my bomb that would defeat him utterley for the last time. .....
This is kind of puerile.  It is entirely obvious from the way 'The G-d Delusion' is written that it is not addressed to sincere believers.  He does seem to hope that they will read it and wake up to the real world, but he has almost no grasp of the religious mentality and consequently fails in every way to address their questions and concerns.

In my opinion, anyone sick enough to need a sense of certainty about the universe and their place in it is better off with a religion.  I only wish they would update their myths to take better accounting of the world as we now know it, which is infinitely more grand, mysterious, and beautiful than that attributed to the Hebrew G-d.  It seems to me entirely possible to view the world with a sense of religious reverence and wonder, and even a touch of the truly spiritual, without needing to keep oneself in an arrested state of mediaeval idiocy.

...he just smacks a bit too much of the crusader, for my tastes.
I am a bit torn on this point.  I entirely agree that he can seem far too forceful in his argumentation, but I suppose he feels it is necessary to counterbalance the all-too-familiar crusading from the religious camp.  And it is not as though any of the positions which he champions are controversial: biological evolution has been proven and demonstrable fact for half a century, and continuing to deny it is nothing short of moronic.  If we, as a society, are supposed to allow for a crusader mentality to be appropriated by those who wish to put out their own eyes and live in a fantasy world, I can't see that we can sustain any real objection to Dawkin's particularly bombastic rhetoric and oversimplification.
Title: Re: CALLED DAWKIN'S BLUFF!
Post by: Christopher McCandless on August 23, 2007, 04:33:03 PM
:lol:
I would be whining too if i had to show a group of students around.
I was introduced to such a group once, it was a surprise attack. I was asked what i thought about the place, i said - don't come here it's shit.
Lol, when i went to Bristol they were all trying to bum me. Oxford on the other hand, they seemed really miserable.
Title: Re: CALLED DAWKIN'S BLUFF!
Post by: Callaway on August 23, 2007, 09:32:51 PM
I downloaded The God Delusion and am listening to it at work...  man what a pompous asshole.
He is a proffessor at Awksfawd. Many of them are like that.
Oh, for crying out loud, Hadron. If that's your opinion of Oxford why the heck did you put it down as your first chioce?

*cough* sour grapes *cough*

 :green:
Title: Re: CALLED DAWKIN'S BLUFF!
Post by: Walkie on August 24, 2007, 05:47:05 AM
I downloaded The God Delusion and am listening to it at work...  man what a pompous asshole.
He is a proffessor at Awksfawd. Many of them are like that.
Oh, for crying out loud, Hadron. If that's your opinion of Oxford why the heck did you put it down as your first chioce?

*cough* sour grapes *cough*

 :green:

Funny you should think that, Callaway That's just what I was thinking. ;)

Heck, Hadron, you'll be turning into Aspieknee at this rate. *wince*. Seriously.
Title: Re: CALLED DAWKIN'S BLUFF!
Post by: The_P on August 24, 2007, 12:50:21 PM
:lol:
I would be whining too if i had to show a group of students around.
I was introduced to such a group once, it was a surprise attack. I was asked what i thought about the place, i said - don't come here it's shit.
Lol, when i went to Bristol they were all trying to bum me. Oxford on the other hand, they seemed really miserable.

Oh gee, Hardon must be hawt stuff.
Title: Re: CALLED DAWKIN'S BLUFF!
Post by: duncvis on August 24, 2007, 04:45:12 PM
I downloaded The God Delusion and am listening to it at work...  man what a pompous asshole.
He is a proffessor at Awksfawd. Many of them are like that.
Oh, for crying out loud, Hadron. If that's your opinion of Oxford why the heck did you put it down as your first chioce?

*cough* sour grapes *cough*

 :green:

Funny you should think that, Callaway That's just what I was thinking. ;)

Heck, Hadron, you'll be turning into Aspieknee at this rate. *wince*. Seriously.

Please nobody tell Aspieknee about this site.  :hide:
Title: Re: CALLED DAWKIN'S BLUFF!
Post by: Christopher McCandless on August 24, 2007, 04:46:50 PM
I downloaded The God Delusion and am listening to it at work...  man what a pompous asshole.
He is a proffessor at Awksfawd. Many of them are like that.
Oh, for crying out loud, Hadron. If that's your opinion of Oxford why the heck did you put it down as your first chioce?

*cough* sour grapes *cough*

 :green:

Funny you should think that, Callaway That's just what I was thinking. ;)

Heck, Hadron, you'll be turning into Aspieknee at this rate. *wince*. Seriously.

Please nobody tell Aspieknee about this site.  :hide:
Who is Aspieknee?
Title: Re: CALLED DAWKIN'S BLUFF!
Post by: Dexter Morgan on August 24, 2007, 07:00:05 PM
All religions are not bad, just the ones based in antiquated principles.
Title: Re: CALLED DAWKIN'S BLUFF!
Post by: Pyraxis on August 24, 2007, 07:01:36 PM
It seems to me entirely possible to view the world with a sense of religious reverence and wonder, and even a touch of the truly spiritual, without needing to keep oneself in an arrested state of mediaeval idiocy.

 :laugh: Nicely put.
Title: Re: CALLED DAWKIN'S BLUFF!
Post by: Callaway on August 24, 2007, 09:34:12 PM
I downloaded The God Delusion and am listening to it at work...  man what a pompous asshole.
He is a proffessor at Awksfawd. Many of them are like that.
Oh, for crying out loud, Hadron. If that's your opinion of Oxford why the heck did you put it down as your first chioce?

*cough* sour grapes *cough*

 :green:

Funny you should think that, Callaway That's just what I was thinking. ;)

Heck, Hadron, you'll be turning into Aspieknee at this rate. *wince*. Seriously.

Please nobody tell Aspieknee about this site.  :hide:
Who is Aspieknee?

I'm not telling you. :razz:

*Thinks of puppy dog eyes*

OK, he's someone who always has to have the last word, no matter what, and he posts in red.  Most annoying.

Title: Re: CALLED DAWKIN'S BLUFF!
Post by: renaeden on August 24, 2007, 11:12:27 PM
There was a lot of other lazy bastards there when i went.
All the people showing us around had a book stuffed up their nose, and were whining about how much work they had to do. Poor NT's and their lack of an eidetic memory...
And thus sayeth the lord... of sweet fuck-all.
You dont think I might know my stuff just a little on this one.
Not if you are saying all autistics have eidetic memory. Because they don't.

You put NTs down and you try to act like one at the same time. That is not logical.
Title: Re: CALLED DAWKIN'S BLUFF!
Post by: Walkie on August 25, 2007, 04:56:20 AM
I downloaded The God Delusion and am listening to it at work...  man what a pompous asshole.
He is a proffessor at Awksfawd. Many of them are like that.
Oh, for crying out loud, Hadron. If that's your opinion of Oxford why the heck did you put it down as your first chioce?

*cough* sour grapes *cough*

 :green:

Funny you should think that, Callaway That's just what I was thinking. ;)

Heck, Hadron, you'll be turning into Aspieknee at this rate. *wince*. Seriously.

Please nobody tell Aspieknee about this site.  :hide:
Who is Aspieknee?

I'm not telling you. :razz:

*Thinks of puppy dog eyes*

OK, he's someone who always has to have the last word, no matter what, and he posts in red.  Most annoying.

More pertinently, he's somebody who carries an immense chip on his shoulder, because (way back in the eighties) he failed to achieve the kind of recognition that  Luke Jackson has, as a child author. He therefore attemts to discredit Luke Jackson at every opportunity, all in the name of his campaign on behalf of child authors   ??? The sour grapes are painfully obvious

Quote from: Aspieknee
http://www.indymedia.org.uk/en/regions/liverpool/2003/12/282669.html?c=on

My greatest cause of pain in AS publicity concerns its use of child
>authors, that's Kenneth Hall and Luke Jackson. The wild adulation
>they are getting, is all written as if they had succeeded wholly on
>merit and as if any child with the same abilities could have the
>same success, implying no one else has the abilities. this is doing
>a poisonous mass injustice to both aspies and non-aspies, because it
>shows no awareness that most children who want to be authors are
>being denied the chance, by the volume and abusively tight
>enforcement of school homework that has existed for the past
>generation. I challenge you to look at the record and see that since
>Lindsay Brown in 1978 no child author has emerged to success,
>without having some special factor in their life outside school to
>protect them from homework ruining it. Kenneth Hall is home
>educated, and Luke Jackson, with his horrible personality cult
>labels of unique and amazing, simply had the adults interested in
>his dietary problem, to protect his chance to succeed. So they are
>creations of circumstantial luck most people don't have, and until
>them no non-famous children at all had succeeded as authors since
>1978: a sinister lost generation, that I belong to. Can any aspie
>suffer a more wounding pain of oppression from the present AS image
>machine, than this? - to read the words "It is not often that a 14
>year old boy gets a book published", after I never asked to be a 14
>year old boy with too much homework to get a book published?
>
>There are other reasons, captivity of mind, international law on
>slavery, the abusivensss of mad expectations, children who have
>committed suicide, for holding as I do that homework is a crime
>against humanity. but to every destroyed child author, aspie or not,
>who is upset by Luke, I have an offer. I'm a child author whose
>completion of a sci-fi novel was prevented by criminally idiotic
>life ruining homework in this way, but before it was, I was lucky
>enough to get child author publicity in Welsh newspapers, South
>Wales Echo 20 August 1980 and Western Mail 19 January 1982. The
>point of boasting of this is that it vindicates the genuineness of
>destroyed child authors' experience and shows from historical record
>that we exist. So all destroyed child authors without any historical
>record of their own, you can refer to this in order to have the
>confidence to speak out. Don't live in fear that no one will believe
>you were a child author.
Title: Re: CALLED DAWKIN'S BLUFF!
Post by: Christopher McCandless on August 25, 2007, 07:30:34 AM
There was a lot of other lazy bastards there when i went.
All the people showing us around had a book stuffed up their nose, and were whining about how much work they had to do. Poor NT's and their lack of an eidetic memory...
And thus sayeth the lord... of sweet fuck-all.
You dont think I might know my stuff just a little on this one.
Not if you are saying all autistics have eidetic memory. Because they don't.

You put NTs down and you try to act like one at the same time. That is not logical.
Autistic people on average have a lot better memory that NT's I believe.

I may act like an NT out of neccesity, rather than wanting to.
Title: Re: CALLED DAWKIN'S BLUFF!
Post by: renaeden on August 25, 2007, 08:42:01 AM
There was a lot of other lazy bastards there when i went.
All the people showing us around had a book stuffed up their nose, and were whining about how much work they had to do. Poor NT's and their lack of an eidetic memory...
And thus sayeth the lord... of sweet fuck-all.
You dont think I might know my stuff just a little on this one.
Not if you are saying all autistics have eidetic memory. Because they don't.You put NTs down and you try to act like one at the same time. That is not logical.
Autistic people on average have a lot better memory that NT's I believe.
I may act like an NT out of neccesity, rather than wanting to.
GA has a good memory, maybe even photographic. I wish that I did, even before ECT it was terrible.

Hopefully in the future you don't have to act NT. Less stress to be the natural you.
Title: Re: CALLED DAWKIN'S BLUFF!
Post by: Christopher McCandless on August 25, 2007, 10:10:32 AM
I downloaded The God Delusion and am listening to it at work...  man what a pompous asshole.
He is a proffessor at Awksfawd. Many of them are like that.
Oh, for crying out loud, Hadron. If that's your opinion of Oxford why the heck did you put it down as your first chioce?

*cough* sour grapes *cough*

 :green:

Funny you should think that, Callaway That's just what I was thinking. ;)

Heck, Hadron, you'll be turning into Aspieknee at this rate. *wince*. Seriously.

Please nobody tell Aspieknee about this site.  :hide:
Who is Aspieknee?

I'm not telling you. :razz:

*Thinks of puppy dog eyes*

OK, he's someone who always has to have the last word, no matter what, and he posts in red.  Most annoying.

More pertinently, he's somebody who carries an immense chip on his shoulder, because (way back in the eighties) he failed to achieve the kind of recognition that  Luke Jackson has, as a child author. He therefore attemts to discredit Luke Jackson at every opportunity, all in the name of his campaign on behalf of child authors   ??? The sour grapes are painfully obvious

Quote from: Aspieknee
http://www.indymedia.org.uk/en/regions/liverpool/2003/12/282669.html?c=on

My greatest cause of pain in AS publicity concerns its use of child
>authors, that's Kenneth Hall and Luke Jackson. The wild adulation
>they are getting, is all written as if they had succeeded wholly on
>merit and as if any child with the same abilities could have the
>same success, implying no one else has the abilities. this is doing
>a poisonous mass injustice to both aspies and non-aspies, because it
>shows no awareness that most children who want to be authors are
>being denied the chance, by the volume and abusively tight
>enforcement of school homework that has existed for the past
>generation. I challenge you to look at the record and see that since
>Lindsay Brown in 1978 no child author has emerged to success,
>without having some special factor in their life outside school to
>protect them from homework ruining it. Kenneth Hall is home
>educated, and Luke Jackson, with his horrible personality cult
>labels of unique and amazing, simply had the adults interested in
>his dietary problem, to protect his chance to succeed. So they are
>creations of circumstantial luck most people don't have, and until
>them no non-famous children at all had succeeded as authors since
>1978: a sinister lost generation, that I belong to. Can any aspie
>suffer a more wounding pain of oppression from the present AS image
>machine, than this? - to read the words "It is not often that a 14
>year old boy gets a book published", after I never asked to be a 14
>year old boy with too much homework to get a book published?
>
>There are other reasons, captivity of mind, international law on
>slavery, the abusivensss of mad expectations, children who have
>committed suicide, for holding as I do that homework is a crime
>against humanity. but to every destroyed child author, aspie or not,
>who is upset by Luke, I have an offer. I'm a child author whose
>completion of a sci-fi novel was prevented by criminally idiotic
>life ruining homework in this way, but before it was, I was lucky
>enough to get child author publicity in Welsh newspapers, South
>Wales Echo 20 August 1980 and Western Mail 19 January 1982. The
>point of boasting of this is that it vindicates the genuineness of
>destroyed child authors' experience and shows from historical record
>that we exist. So all destroyed child authors without any historical
>record of their own, you can refer to this in order to have the
>confidence to speak out. Don't live in fear that no one will believe
>you were a child author.

I dont like Luke Jacksons books entirely, but there are some things about him I respect. I cant believe this guy is complaining so loudly about him, why doesnt he go and do something constructive as opposed to whining. Asides, I have had my big hit of publicity some time ago, not sure I need to repeat that experience...
Title: Re: CALLED DAWKIN'S BLUFF!
Post by: Christopher McCandless on August 25, 2007, 10:13:22 AM
There was a lot of other lazy bastards there when i went.
All the people showing us around had a book stuffed up their nose, and were whining about how much work they had to do. Poor NT's and their lack of an eidetic memory...
And thus sayeth the lord... of sweet fuck-all.
You dont think I might know my stuff just a little on this one.
Not if you are saying all autistics have eidetic memory. Because they don't.You put NTs down and you try to act like one at the same time. That is not logical.
Autistic people on average have a lot better memory that NT's I believe.
I may act like an NT out of neccesity, rather than wanting to.
GA has a good memory, maybe even photographic. I wish that I did, even before ECT it was terrible.

Hopefully in the future you don't have to act NT. Less stress to be the natural you.
I thought ECT was illegal, how come they gave you that?  :o Having an amazing memory has its disadvantages, I assure you. There is plenty I would like to forget.

In the future being NT will hopefully actually be being an aspie. That would be fun. All we aspies now need to do is breed  :evillaugh:
Title: Re: CALLED DAWKIN'S BLUFF!
Post by: Callaway on August 25, 2007, 10:36:17 AM
Quote from: aspieknee
holding as I do that homework is a crime against humanity

:LMAO:

Believe me, Aspieknee completely refuses to write the book now, Hadron.  He has more excuses than you can imagine.

He's too busy whining that his life was totally ruined because he couldn't write it when he was a child because he had too much homework.
Title: Re: CALLED DAWKIN'S BLUFF!
Post by: Christopher McCandless on August 25, 2007, 10:38:48 AM
Quote from: aspieknee
holding as I do that homework is a crime against humanity

:LMAO:

Believe me, Aspieknee completely refuses to write the book now, Hadron.  He has more excuses than you can imagine.

He's too busy whining that his life was totally ruined because he couldn't write it when he was a child because he had too much homework.
He was an idiot if he did his homework, I used have brilliant ways of getting out of it.  Whereabouts does Aspieknee post, anyhows?

Title: Re: CALLED DAWKIN'S BLUFF!
Post by: Callaway on August 25, 2007, 10:40:35 AM
Quote from: aspieknee
holding as I do that homework is a crime against humanity

:LMAO:

Believe me, Aspieknee completely refuses to write the book now, Hadron.  He has more excuses than you can imagine.

He's too busy whining that his life was totally ruined because he couldn't write it when he was a child because he had too much homework.
He was an idiot if he did his homework, I used have brilliant ways of getting out of it.  Whereabouts does Aspieknee post, anyhows?



He has his own website because he gets kicked off everywhere else.
Title: Re: CALLED DAWKIN'S BLUFF!
Post by: Christopher McCandless on August 25, 2007, 10:42:01 AM
Quote from: aspieknee
holding as I do that homework is a crime against humanity

:LMAO:

Believe me, Aspieknee completely refuses to write the book now, Hadron.  He has more excuses than you can imagine.

He's too busy whining that his life was totally ruined because he couldn't write it when he was a child because he had too much homework.
He was an idiot if he did his homework, I used have brilliant ways of getting out of it.  Whereabouts does Aspieknee post, anyhows?



He has his own website because he gets kicked off everywhere else.
Can you link me to it please?  Has even wrong plant kicked him off then?
Title: Re: CALLED DAWKIN'S BLUFF!
Post by: Callaway on August 25, 2007, 10:46:35 AM
Quote from: aspieknee
holding as I do that homework is a crime against humanity

:LMAO:

Believe me, Aspieknee completely refuses to write the book now, Hadron.  He has more excuses than you can imagine.

He's too busy whining that his life was totally ruined because he couldn't write it when he was a child because he had too much homework.
He was an idiot if he did his homework, I used have brilliant ways of getting out of it.  Whereabouts does Aspieknee post, anyhows?



He has his own website because he gets kicked off everywhere else.
Can you link me to it please?  Has even wrong plant kicked him off then?

Sorry, I have not been there in over a year, so I don't remember where it is and I don't know if it still exists.

I don't know if he has ever been on WP.
Title: Re: CALLED DAWKIN'S BLUFF!
Post by: Christopher McCandless on August 25, 2007, 02:12:29 PM
Quote from: aspieknee
holding as I do that homework is a crime against humanity

:LMAO:

Believe me, Aspieknee completely refuses to write the book now, Hadron.  He has more excuses than you can imagine.

He's too busy whining that his life was totally ruined because he couldn't write it when he was a child because he had too much homework.
He was an idiot if he did his homework, I used have brilliant ways of getting out of it.  Whereabouts does Aspieknee post, anyhows?



He has his own website because he gets kicked off everywhere else.
Can you link me to it please?  Has even wrong plant kicked him off then?

Sorry, I have not been there in over a year, so I don't remember where it is and I don't know if it still exists.

I don't know if he has ever been on WP.
Oh well if I come across him, i might give him a good leg in the knee...  :P
Title: Re: CALLED DAWKIN'S BLUFF!
Post by: Rabbit From Hell on August 25, 2007, 02:22:11 PM
I went to a seminar last night where Dawkins was reading from his book.   All the way through, Christians were tearing ofF their crosses and beads and throwing them away while Dawkins cheered then for seeing reason.  However, I jUSt sat through it with a smug smile on my face, waiting to drop my bomb that would defeat him utterley for the last time.

Al the end of the talk I stood up and said, " so basically you deny God from lack of evidence."  he said "yes".

I said "I have no evidence of your thoughts, do I?  So how do I know you have a brain???"

He just stood there, quivering.  Then he fell to his knees and started crying, "God forgive me, what have I done, I have sinned, what have I done".
Then he crawled away on his hands and knees dripping tears on the stage,  while everyone applauded me.  Then I led them to the nearest church.

That's pretty funny... I like that.  I'm not necessarily a christian, I do find it funny when pompous asses like that are shot down.
Title: Re: CALLED DAWKIN'S BLUFF!
Post by: Calandale on August 25, 2007, 08:54:53 PM

Autistic people on average have a lot better memory that NT's I believe.

Depends on for what.
I can't remember the
little important things which
get one through the day, but
if it might be close to an area
of interest, mine's damned good.
Title: Re: CALLED DAWKIN'S BLUFF!
Post by: morthaur on August 25, 2007, 11:00:00 PM
He has his own website because he gets kicked off everywhere else.
Can you link me to it please?  Has even wrong plant kicked him off then?
http://spectrum-fairness.blog.co.uk/ (http://spectrum-fairness.blog.co.uk/)
Title: Re: CALLED DAWKIN'S BLUFF!
Post by: Callaway on August 25, 2007, 11:33:41 PM
Thanks, Morthaur.

I see he is still going strong.

 :laugh:
Title: Re: CALLED DAWKIN'S BLUFF!
Post by: renaeden on August 27, 2007, 05:58:08 AM
Thanks, Morthaur.
I see he is still going strong.
 :laugh:
I saw this on there:
Quote
Think power of being admin is a bit much for some people hmmm. They get to lock posts whenever they feel like it and to boot off anyone they don't like.
  :laugh:
Title: Re: CALLED DAWKIN'S BLUFF!
Post by: Christopher McCandless on August 27, 2007, 06:37:14 AM
He has his own website because he gets kicked off everywhere else.
Can you link me to it please?  Has even wrong plant kicked him off then?
http://spectrum-fairness.blog.co.uk/ (http://spectrum-fairness.blog.co.uk/)
Thanks for getting me the link.  :) Now we are going to get another thread about SF...
Title: Re: CALLED DAWKIN'S BLUFF!
Post by: Yuri Bezmenov on October 14, 2014, 09:35:16 AM
I went to a seminar last night where Dawkins was reading from his book.   All the way through, Christians were tearing ofF their crosses and beads and throwing them away while Dawkins cheered then for seeing reason.  However, I jUSt sat through it with a smug smile on my face, waiting to drop my bomb that would defeat him utterley for the last time.

Al the end of the talk I stood up and said, " so basically you deny God from lack of evidence."  he said "yes".

I said "I have no evidence of your thoughts, do I?  So how do I know you have a brain???"

He just stood there, quivering.  Then he fell to his knees and started crying, "God forgive me, what have I done, I have sinned, what have I done".
Then he crawled away on his hands and knees dripping tears on the stage,  while everyone applauded me.  Then I led them to the nearest church.

::)           ::)           ::)           ::)           ::)
::)           ::)           ::)           ::)           ::)
Title: Re: CALLED DAWKIN'S BLUFF!
Post by: Yuri Bezmenov on July 28, 2018, 07:19:20 PM
What the hell is this crap??
Title: Re: CALLED DAWKIN'S BLUFF!
Post by: Minister Of Silly Walks on July 28, 2018, 08:00:06 PM
I find it difficult to take anyone seriously who is primarily famous for not believing in god.

That makes about as much sense as being famous for not believing in the tooth fairy.
Title: Re: CALLED DAWKIN'S BLUFF!
Post by: Yuri Bezmenov on July 28, 2018, 08:20:24 PM
I find it difficult to take anyone seriously who is primarily famous for not believing in god.

That makes about as much sense as being famous for not believing in the tooth fairy.

 ::)      ::)      ::)      ::)      ::)

Dawkins is primarily famous for being an evolutionary biologist from Oxford you fucking reetard!!   :hahaha:
Title: Re: CALLED DAWKIN'S BLUFF!
Post by: Minister Of Silly Walks on July 28, 2018, 08:40:53 PM
I find it difficult to take anyone seriously who is primarily famous for not believing in god.

That makes about as much sense as being famous for not believing in the tooth fairy.

 ::)      ::)      ::)      ::)      ::)

Dawkins is primarily famous for being an evolutionary biologist from Oxford you fucking reetard!!   :hahaha:

Bollocks. He would be just one of thousands of academics that most people have never heard of if it weren't for the amount of mental bandwidth he puts into not believing in a sky fairy.

You think he's a real smart intellectual because he adds some academic sheen to some of your own prejudices. I'm gonna miss McDangly making you his bitch.
Title: Re: CALLED DAWKIN'S BLUFF!
Post by: Al Swearegen on July 29, 2018, 02:21:25 AM
I find it difficult to take anyone seriously who is primarily famous for not believing in god.

That makes about as much sense as being famous for not believing in the tooth fairy.

 ::)      ::)      ::)      ::)      ::)

Dawkins is primarily famous for being an evolutionary biologist from Oxford you fucking reetard!!   :hahaha:

Bollocks. He would be just one of thousands of academics that most people have never heard of if it weren't for the amount of mental bandwidth he puts into not believing in a sky fairy.

You think he's a real smart intellectual because he adds some academic sheen to some of your own prejudices. I'm gonna miss McDangly making you his bitch.

MDagli1 made no one his bitch. He was a barely comprehensible troll.
Title: Re: CALLED DAWKIN'S BLUFF!
Post by: Minister Of Silly Walks on July 29, 2018, 02:31:02 AM
Watching McDangly and Pappy and Al battle it out for intellectual honours was like watching 3 bald men fighting over a comb.
Title: Re: CALLED DAWKIN'S BLUFF!
Post by: Tom/Mutate on July 29, 2018, 03:50:22 AM
I find it difficult to take anyone seriously who is primarily famous for not believing in god.

That makes about as much sense as being famous for not believing in the tooth fairy.

that is a ridiculously unfair, uninformed and reductive comment. He's also famous for being mean to Muslims on twitter.
Title: Re: CALLED DAWKIN'S BLUFF!
Post by: Al Swearegen on July 29, 2018, 02:41:42 PM
Watching McDangly and Pappy and Al battle it out for intellectual honours was like watching 3 bald men fighting over a comb.

None of us are battling fpr intellectual honours, you Goofy Mother Fucker. So that being the case, why would,you say something both untrue and stupid?
Title: Re: CALLED DAWKIN'S BLUFF!
Post by: Tom/Mutate on July 29, 2018, 03:58:53 PM
that's a funny conversation about Aspie knee on this thread. I still have him on facebook believe it or not. I think he mellowed out a bit.
Title: Re: CALLED DAWKIN'S BLUFF!
Post by: Gopher Gary on July 29, 2018, 04:12:49 PM
 :zoinks:

(https://i.kym-cdn.com/photos/images/original/000/566/054/bcd.jpg)
Title: Re: CALLED DAWKIN'S BLUFF!
Post by: Calandale on July 29, 2018, 09:09:20 PM
Watching McDangly and Pappy and Al battle it out for intellectual honours was like watching 3 bald men fighting over a comb.

None of us are battling fpr intellectual honours, you Goofy Mother Fucker. So that being the case, why would,you say something both untrue and stupid?

And here it seemed you were each straining your intellects to the max.
Title: Re: CALLED DAWKIN'S BLUFF!
Post by: odeon on July 29, 2018, 09:23:27 PM
Watching McDangly and Pappy and Al battle it out for intellectual honours was like watching 3 bald men fighting over a comb.

None of us are battling fpr intellectual honours, you Goofy Mother Fucker. So that being the case, why would,you say something both untrue and stupid?

I think the comb is yours.
Title: Re: CALLED DAWKIN'S BLUFF!
Post by: Al Swearegen on July 30, 2018, 02:45:06 AM
Watching McDangly and Pappy and Al battle it out for intellectual honours was like watching 3 bald men fighting over a comb.

None of us are battling fpr intellectual honours, you Goofy Mother Fucker. So that being the case, why would,you say something both untrue and stupid?

And here it seemed you were each straining your intellects to the max.

Not at all.
Title: Re: CALLED DAWKIN'S BLUFF!
Post by: Minister Of Silly Walks on July 30, 2018, 02:57:40 AM
(https://t4.ftcdn.net/jpg/00/61/09/03/240_F_61090318_QAWNcQOephM1hvMDvIunE1acLKeGGPYX.jpg)
Title: Re: CALLED DAWKIN'S BLUFF!
Post by: Al Swearegen on July 30, 2018, 03:08:32 AM
Watching McDangly and Pappy and Al battle it out for intellectual honours was like watching 3 bald men fighting over a comb.

None of us are battling fpr intellectual honours, you Goofy Mother Fucker. So that being the case, why would,you say something both untrue and stupid?

I think the comb is yours.

Yes, "the comb". The non-existent comb, belonging to the 3 bald men who are fighting for it, right? Yes, it was an analogy that was made about a non-existent battle for intellectual honours. So the weak analogy based on a non-existent race.

It was fucking stupid and ridiculous from the outset but you are supporting your boyfriend as always and normally I would find that cute and endearing. However, in this instance, because it is you, I would probably suggest you try to stop flirting and metaphorically holding Minister of Silly Walk's hand. I do not think such a forum member relationship with you, will come to good ends.
Title: Re: CALLED DAWKIN'S BLUFF!
Post by: odeon on July 31, 2018, 09:19:58 PM
I'm sure you thought that was witty, but we all know you were McDangly's bitch.
Title: Re: CALLED DAWKIN'S BLUFF!
Post by: Al Swearegen on August 01, 2018, 03:06:55 AM
I'm sure you thought that was witty, but we all know you were McDangly's bitch.

We all know you are Scrap's Bitch
Title: Re: CALLED DAWKIN'S BLUFF!
Post by: odeon on August 01, 2018, 10:08:05 PM
Do you miss your master?
Title: Re: CALLED DAWKIN'S BLUFF!
Post by: Al Swearegen on August 05, 2018, 05:23:19 AM
Do you miss your master?

I do not have a master and so it would be pretty stupid to miss what I don't and have never had. To imply this would make you a moron.
On an unrelated note do you ever get uncomfortable doing this textual mutual masturbation with Minister of Silly Walks. I would be fucking embarrassed by you seem pretty keen on it. As I said, I think you stop this behaviour. I think members ought to be free from such flirtatious behaviour. We have seen bad consequences from this. I think Minister of Silly Walks should be spared this predatory behaviour.   
Title: Re: CALLED DAWKIN'S BLUFF!
Post by: odeon on August 05, 2018, 08:04:59 AM
I didn't bother reading. Sorry.
Title: Re: CALLED DAWKIN'S BLUFF!
Post by: Al Swearegen on August 05, 2018, 08:16:08 AM
I didn't bother reading. Sorry.

Good choice. One of the few you have made in recent times
Title: Re: CALLED DAWKIN'S BLUFF!
Post by: odeon on August 05, 2018, 08:17:19 AM
Don't be sad.
Title: Re: CALLED DAWKIN'S BLUFF!
Post by: Al Swearegen on August 05, 2018, 08:23:29 AM
Don't be sad.

I am not in the least bit sad. In fact, I think you made a good choice.
Title: Re: CALLED DAWKIN'S BLUFF!
Post by: Lestat on August 05, 2018, 01:28:48 PM
I'd LOVE to watch Typh rip both your damn faces off. Oh my, that'd be fucking funny as shit. You know it, Al, you carry on with this crap and she's eat your soul, skinned and screaming.
Title: Re: CALLED DAWKIN'S BLUFF!
Post by: Al Swearegen on August 10, 2018, 08:16:38 PM
I'd LOVE to watch Typh rip both your damn faces off. Oh my, that'd be fucking funny as shit. You know it, Al, you carry on with this crap and she's eat your soul, skinned and screaming.

I know her and I know you talk her up but no she would not. She never particularly bothered me.