INTENSITY²

Start here => Free For ALL => Topic started by: Scrapheap on April 18, 2007, 12:22:32 AM

Title: UFC 70 in Manchester
Post by: Scrapheap on April 18, 2007, 12:22:32 AM
  Well did any of you Brittons get tickets to see it or did you all go emo or something ??  :P

One of your own countrymen, Michael Bisping (http://www.ufc.com/index.cfm?fa=fighter.detail&pid=445), will be fighting there.

Anyways, it looks like one hell of a fight card.

http://www.ufc.com/index.cfm?fa=EventDetail.FightCard&eid=472 (http://www.ufc.com/index.cfm?fa=EventDetail.FightCard&eid=472)
Title: Re: UFC 70 in Manchester
Post by: duncvis on April 18, 2007, 04:00:33 AM
Nah... the cheapest tickets are £25 (at which vantage point from the back of the top tier it kind of defeats the point of going I guess) - I can watch brawls for free driving through town on a weekend at pub chucking out time without driving thirty miles and getting charged a fiver by scallies in yellow jackets to park half a mile away... :P
Title: Re: UFC 70 in Manchester
Post by: Scrapheap on April 18, 2007, 01:21:52 PM
Nah... the cheapest tickets are £25 (at which vantage point from the back of the top tier it kind of defeats the point of going I guess) - I can watch brawls for free driving through town on a weekend at pub chucking out time without driving thirty miles and getting charged a fiver by scallies in yellow jackets to park half a mile away... :P

Yeah, I get your point. I was thinking about going to UFC 71 at the MGM Grand in Vegas, but tickets are $500.  :o
Title: Re: UFC 70 in Manchester
Post by: The_P on April 18, 2007, 01:22:48 PM
Digital tv much?
Title: Re: UFC 70 in Manchester
Post by: McGiver on April 18, 2007, 01:43:16 PM
The Rock could kisk any of their arses.
Title: Re: UFC 70 in Manchester
Post by: The_P on April 18, 2007, 01:44:40 PM
The Rock could kisk any of their arses.

Can you smeeeelllll what the Fagg had for lunch?
Title: Re: UFC 70 in Manchester
Post by: McGiver on April 18, 2007, 01:46:26 PM
tuna.

or was that yo momma?
Title: Re: UFC 70 in Manchester
Post by: Scrapheap on April 22, 2007, 07:53:34 AM
OK, I wathed the fight last night.... They kept giving the fighters weight in pounds AND STONE.

WTF is Stone ?? Any why do you Brits use such an antiquated system ??
Title: Re: UFC 70 in Manchester
Post by: duncvis on April 22, 2007, 07:56:40 AM
OK, I wathed the fight last night.... They kept giving the fighters weight in pounds AND STONE.

WTF is Stone ?? Any why do you Brits use such an antiquated system ??

A stone is 14 pounds. Its a hangover from imperial weights and measures - we're mostly metric, but stones, pounds and ounces is still better understood than kilograms, and feet and inches better understood than (centi)metres, particularly for the older generations.
Title: Re: UFC 70 in Manchester
Post by: McGiver on April 22, 2007, 07:58:21 AM
i like how the metric system works in tens.  much simpler, IMHO.
Title: Re: UFC 70 in Manchester
Post by: duncvis on April 22, 2007, 08:00:08 AM
Do you know your weight in kilos McJ?


Title: Re: UFC 70 in Manchester
Post by: McGiver on April 22, 2007, 08:03:10 AM
Do you know your weight in kilos McJ?



fuck no.


but if i had learned through your system, i am sure it would have been much easier.

16 oz for a pound
12 inches for a foot

wtf.  in tens is much simpler.
Title: Re: UFC 70 in Manchester
Post by: Calandale on April 22, 2007, 08:06:27 AM
Not if you're Sumerian.
Title: Re: UFC 70 in Manchester
Post by: McGiver on April 22, 2007, 08:08:59 AM
Not if you're Sumerian.
i don't understand how clark kent is at all relevent to this topic.
Title: Re: UFC 70 in Manchester
Post by: Calandale on April 22, 2007, 08:10:46 AM
6 fingers is dominant.
Title: Re: UFC 70 in Manchester
Post by: duncvis on April 22, 2007, 08:45:21 AM
Do you know your weight in kilos McJ?



fuck no.


but if i had learned through your system, i am sure it would have been much easier.

16 oz for a pound
12 inches for a foot

wtf.  in tens is much simpler.

As a kid in the eighties, we learned both, but imperial stuck better since everyone used it. later we had to have goods etc sold in metric, and its more accepted now.
Title: Re: UFC 70 in Manchester
Post by: ASpHole on April 22, 2007, 09:07:03 AM
OK, I wathed the fight last night.... They kept giving the fighters weight in pounds AND STONE.

WTF is Stone ?? Any why do you Brits use such an antiquated system ??

A stone is 14 pounds. Its a hangover from imperial weights and measures - we're mostly metric, but stones, pounds and ounces is still better understood than kilograms, and feet and inches better understood than (centi)metres, particularly for the older generations.

So..... how far is it from where you live to Mancs......measured in Rods?  >:D

OTOH, I know the Canadians, (Or at least the ones in Quebec, at any rate) still have issues with the Metric system. The French speaking people adopted the system quite readily, the English speaking people OTOH were holding out. In English speaking areas, people use Standard weight equivalents. --You go into a store and get 454 grams of hamburger.
Title: Re: UFC 70 in Manchester
Post by: duncvis on April 22, 2007, 09:29:14 AM
Rods? Not a fucking clue. :P About thirty miles. Leeds is about twenty.

A lot of stuff is still packaged here in imperial equivalents, like 454g and 568ml, and sold loose by the pound. They just have to display weight/price per metric unit as well.
Title: Re: UFC 70 in Manchester
Post by: McGiver on April 22, 2007, 01:48:00 PM
Rods? Not a fucking clue. :P About thirty miles. Leeds is about twenty.

A lot of stuff is still packaged here in imperial equivalents, like 454g and 568ml, and sold loose by the pound. They just have to display weight/price per metric unit as well.

it's funny at the docks when we get bulk cargo that is listed in kilosgrams.
all the machines have maximum weight capacities.
we always just scratch out head.  and we find out which machine can handle the weight by trying.

our machines are listed in pounds.
Title: Re: UFC 70 in Manchester
Post by: Scrapheap on April 22, 2007, 02:52:12 PM
Rods? Not a fucking clue. :P About thirty miles. Leeds is about twenty.

A lot of stuff is still packaged here in imperial equivalents, like 454g and 568ml, and sold loose by the pound. They just have to display weight/price per metric unit as well.

it's funny at the docks when we get bulk cargo that is listed in kilosgrams.
all the machines have maximum weight capacities.
we always just scratch out head.  and we find out which machine can handle the weight by trying.

our machines are listed in pounds.

Have you ever broke something that way ??
Title: Re: UFC 70 in Manchester
Post by: McGiver on April 22, 2007, 03:20:25 PM
Rods? Not a fucking clue. :P About thirty miles. Leeds is about twenty.

A lot of stuff is still packaged here in imperial equivalents, like 454g and 568ml, and sold loose by the pound. They just have to display weight/price per metric unit as well.

it's funny at the docks when we get bulk cargo that is listed in kilosgrams.
all the machines have maximum weight capacities.
we always just scratch out head.  and we find out which machine can handle the weight by trying.

our machines are listed in pounds.

Have you ever broke something that way ??
broke a blade on a heavy lift.
Title: Re: UFC 70 in Manchester
Post by: Callaway on April 22, 2007, 05:16:25 PM
One kilogram is approximately 2.20 pounds, so if you know something has 1000 kilograms of mass, to estimate how much it weighs in pounds, you can double it and then add ten percent of the doubled number, which is not that difficult to do, so 1000 + 1000 = 2000 then add 10% of 2000 or 200 so you get 2200 pounds.  If you wanted a rougher estimate, you could just double the mass in kilograms to get a rough estimate in pounds.