INTENSITY²

Politics, Mature and taboo => Political Pundits => Topic started by: Teejay on April 09, 2007, 07:34:51 AM

Title: Whiter Islam?
Post by: Teejay on April 09, 2007, 07:34:51 AM
I get a feeling from various observations, Islam is a very weak religion and it will crumble in the long run. Christianity is much more adaptable with it's tradition of criticism and interpretation. Plus it is more appealing with the story of the life, death and resurrection of Jesus.

Right now Christianity is winning new converts everyday, (for example Korea has become 1/2 Christian in just a few generations, China's Christian community is rapidly growing), Islam's numbers are growing generally via population growth in existing Muslim communities.

I read something like 6 million Muslims convert to Christianity every year, they keep it secret to avoid reprisals from people they know and the authorities.

In the long run Christianity in some form will become the predominant religion of planet earth, Islam will decline and be restricted groups like the Sufi's. Buddhism, Hinduism, Confucianism will be just marginal religions compared to Christianity and any new age religions which come into the fore.
Title: Re: Whiter Islam?
Post by: odeon on April 09, 2007, 08:20:56 AM
Wikipedia disagrees, somewhat (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Religion#Trends_in_adherence):

Quote
Within the world's four largest religions Christianity currently has the greatest growth by numbers and Islam has the fastest growth by percentage.[24] Christianity is spreading rapidly in northern Africa and the Far East, in particular China and South Korea. Hinduism is undergoing a revival, and many temples are being built, both in India and in other countries. Analyzing percentage growth is a difficult matter - see this article for a discussion. However, the World Christian Encyclopedia and World Christian Trends reported these numbers from growth from 1990-2000[24][25]:

    1990-2000

        * 2.65% - Zoroastrianism
        * 2.28% - Bahá'í Faith
        * 2.13% - Islam
        * 1.87% - Sikhism
        * 1.69% - Hinduism
        * 1.36% - Christianity
        * 1.09% - Buddhism

(the annual growth in the world population over the same period is 1.41%)

However, a quick search on the 'net tells me that yes, some quote up to six million Muslim converts every year. But if you look at an average Christian, in the Western world, quite often that Christian is one only by name. Many are born into the religion but never go to church. Take me as an example; I'm probably a Christian in the statistics since I haven't bothered to leave the church--I was one by default.
Title: Re: Whiter Islam?
Post by: Tom/Mutate on April 09, 2007, 08:32:44 AM
I live in a Christian family, and I've always wondered the discrepancy between what I hear in their news and media compared to the secular - ie thousands of people converting in these countries and thus life becoming better as they follow christianity and rely on help from western christians who apparantly do so much good there.  And these martyrs (ie- missionaries and their families who get killed overbroad) who never get mentioned in regular news.  Mind you, the christian news of these never seems to have any solid dates, places, times etc -seems more apocaphal.
Title: Re: Whiter Islam?
Post by: odeon on April 09, 2007, 10:37:47 AM
It's interesting to note that the numbers quoted by Wikipedia are from Christian sources.
Title: Re: Whiter Islam?
Post by: McGiver on April 09, 2007, 02:10:49 PM
i wonder what the percentage of peoples religious choices are because of forced religion growing up.

how many people actually adopt a different religion than their parents?
Title: Re: Whiter Islam?
Post by: odeon on April 09, 2007, 02:48:49 PM
i wonder what the percentage of peoples religious choices are because of forced religion growing up.

how many people actually adopt a different religion than their parents?

I suspect most people adopt the religion of their parents. As for how much of it is forced, well, that depends on their culture. Islam, catholicism, and a few others are the kind of religions that require more, right from the start.
Title: Re: Whiter Islam?
Post by: Teejay on April 09, 2007, 08:27:20 PM
Wikipedia disagrees, somewhat (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Religion#Trends_in_adherence):

Quote
Within the world's four largest religions Christianity currently has the greatest growth by numbers and Islam has the fastest growth by percentage.[24] Christianity is spreading rapidly in northern Africa and the Far East, in particular China and South Korea. Hinduism is undergoing a revival, and many temples are being built, both in India and in other countries. Analyzing percentage growth is a difficult matter - see this article for a discussion. However, the World Christian Encyclopedia and World Christian Trends reported these numbers from growth from 1990-2000[24][25]:

    1990-2000

        * 2.65% - Zoroastrianism
        * 2.28% - Bahá'í Faith
        * 2.13% - Islam
        * 1.87% - Sikhism
        * 1.69% - Hinduism
        * 1.36% - Christianity
        * 1.09% - Buddhism

(the annual growth in the world population over the same period is 1.41%)

However, a quick search on the 'net tells me that yes, some quote up to six million Muslim converts every year. But if you look at an average Christian, in the Western world, quite often that Christian is one only by name. Many are born into the religion but never go to church. Take me as an example; I'm probably a Christian in the statistics since I haven't bothered to leave the church--I was one by default.

Well Muslims do have a higher birthrate than Christians, although birthrates in the Muslim world is declining. As I said earlier Christianity in places like Africa and Asia are winning over much more new converts from other religions than Islam is.

In the sharia penalty for Muslims converting to another religion is death, which explains why many Muslim converts to Christianity keep quiet.
Title: Re: Whiter Islam?
Post by: McGiver on April 09, 2007, 09:19:33 PM
Quote
In the sharia penalty for Muslims converting to another religion is death, which explains why many Muslim converts to Christianity keep quiet.
certainly this is a misinterpretation.

surely they mean a spiritual death, rather than being physically put to death.
Title: Re: Whiter Islam?
Post by: Scrapheap on April 09, 2007, 09:24:52 PM
You're all dead to me.  :P :P :P :P :P
Title: Re: Whiter Islam?
Post by: Peter on April 09, 2007, 10:44:40 PM
Quote
In the sharia penalty for Muslims converting to another religion is death, which explains why many Muslim converts to Christianity keep quiet.
certainly this is a misinterpretation.

surely they mean a spiritual death, rather than being physically put to death.

No, they definitely mean that apostates should be physically put to death.

Quote from: http://answering-islam.org/Hahn/Mawdudi/index.htm#I
A. The Proof from the Qur'an for the Commandment to Execute the Apostate

Here I wish briefly to offer proof that will quiet the doubt in the hearts of those who, for lack of sources of information, may think that perhaps the punishment of death did not exist in Islam but was added at a later time by the "mawlawis" (religious leaders) on their own.

God Most High declares in the Qur'an:

But if they repent and establish worship and pay the poor-due, then are they your brethren in religion. We detail our revelations for a people who have knowledge. And if they break their pledges after their treaty (hath been made with you) and assail your religion, then fight the heads of disbelief -- Lo! they have no binding oaths in order that they may desist. (9:11,12)[1]

The following is the occasion for the revelation of this verse: During the pilgrimage (hajj) in A.H. 9 God Most High ordered a proclamation of an immunity. By virtue of this proclamation all those who, up to that time, were fighting against God and His Apostle and were attempting to obstruct the way of God's religion through all kinds of excesses and false covenants, were granted from that time a maximum respite of four months. During this period they were to ponder their own situation. If they wanted to accept Islam, they could accept it and they would be forgiven. If they wanted to leave the country, they could leave. Within this fixed period nothing would hinder them from leaving. Thereafter those remaining, who would neither accept Islam nor leave the country, would be dealt with by the sword. In this connection it was said: "If they repent and uphold the practice of prayer and almsgiving, then they are your brothers in religion. If after this, however, they break their covenant, then war should be waged against the leaders of kufr (infidelity). Here "covenant breaking" in no way can be construed to mean "breaking of political covenants". Rather, the context clearly determines its meaning to be "confessing Islam and then renouncing it". Thereafter the meaning of "fight the heads of disbelief" (9:11,12) can only mean that war should be waged against the leaders instigating apostasy.[2]

B. Proof from the Hadith (Canonical Tradition) for the Commandment to Execute the Apostate

After the Qur'an we turn to the Hadith. This is the command of the Prophet:

1. Any person (i.e., Muslim) who has changed his religion, kill him.[3]


This tradition has been narrated by Abu Bakr, Uthman, Ali, Muadh ibn Jabal, Abu Musa Ashari, Abdullah ibn Abbas, Khalid ibn Walid and a number of other Companions, and is found in all the authentic Hadith collections.
Title: Re: Whiter Islam?
Post by: Litigious on April 10, 2007, 06:23:42 AM
Quote
In the sharia penalty for Muslims converting to another religion is death, which explains why many Muslim converts to Christianity keep quiet.
certainly this is a misinterpretation.

surely they mean a spiritual death, rather than being physically put to death.

No. They mean it literally. "'Honour' killing" (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Honor_killing) is literally meant as well, alas.
Title: Re: Whiter Islam?
Post by: McGiver on April 10, 2007, 06:33:18 AM
does the koran say anything about their god being the judger of man?
Title: Re: Whiter Islam?
Post by: Litigious on April 10, 2007, 06:40:40 AM
I haven't read it that much, but I think it does. Though I'm not sure.
Title: Re: Whiter Islam?
Post by: odeon on April 10, 2007, 01:57:49 PM
Peter, Lit,

Ahmad Sa`d (http://discover.islamonline.net/servlet/Satellite?cid=1123996220130&pagename=IslamOnline-English-AAbout_Islam%2FAAboutIslamCounselorE%2FAAboutIslamCounselorE), an Islamic scholar, thinks
otherwise (http://discover.islamonline.net/servlet/Satellite?cid=1164545965182&pagename=IslamOnline-English-AAbout_Islam%2FAskAboutIslamE%2FAskAboutIslamE). Others share similar views (http://www.islamonline.net/servlet/Satellite?pagename=IslamOnline-English-Ask_Scholar/FatwaE/FatwaE&cid=1141277529583), such as Sheikh Ahmad Kutty (http://www.islamonline.net/servlet/Satellite?cid=1119503615013&pagename=IslamOnline-English-Ask_Scholar%2FFatwaCounselorE%2FFatwaCounselorE), another scholar specializing in Shari'ah Thought.

Here's a quote from the latter (but do read his entire comment):

Quote
Freedom of conscience is one of the fundamental rights of humans enshrined in the Qur'an; it is therefore, absurd for anyone to suggest that Islam allows putting people to death just because they convert to another religion.

Even a casual reader of the Qur'an will not fail to be impressed by its emphasis on the freedom of conscience as a cornerstone of its moral structure. To cite a few verses as follows:

[There shall be no compulsion in religion. Distinct has now become the right way from [the wayof] error: hence, he who rejects the powers of evil and believes in God has indeed taken hold of a support most unfailing, which shall never give way: for God is all-hearing, all-knowing] ( Al-Baqarah 2:256)

Your guys are more dramatic than mine, I'd say. They are Christians (http://answering-islam.org/about.html), however, not Muslims, and it seems that  they are modern missionaries to boot. They like the drama (http://answering-islam.org/anonymous.html), it seems. Hmm... I wonder, who should I trust?
Title: Re: Whiter Islam?
Post by: McGiver on April 10, 2007, 02:03:47 PM
trust your family.
no-one else.
Title: Re: Whiter Islam?
Post by: Calandale on April 10, 2007, 02:06:16 PM
Fuck your family. They're out to get you.
Title: Re: Whiter Islam?
Post by: Peter on April 10, 2007, 02:07:36 PM
Peter, Lit,

Ahmad Sa`d (http://discover.islamonline.net/servlet/Satellite?cid=1123996220130&pagename=IslamOnline-English-AAbout_Islam%2FAAboutIslamCounselorE%2FAAboutIslamCounselorE), an Islamic scholar, thinks
otherwise (http://discover.islamonline.net/servlet/Satellite?cid=1164545965182&pagename=IslamOnline-English-AAbout_Islam%2FAskAboutIslamE%2FAskAboutIslamE). Others share similar views (http://www.islamonline.net/servlet/Satellite?pagename=IslamOnline-English-Ask_Scholar/FatwaE/FatwaE&cid=1141277529583), such as Sheikh Ahmad Kutty (http://www.islamonline.net/servlet/Satellite?cid=1119503615013&pagename=IslamOnline-English-Ask_Scholar%2FFatwaCounselorE%2FFatwaCounselorE), another scholar specializing in Shari'ah Thought.

Here's a quote from the latter (but do read his entire comment):

Quote
Freedom of conscience is one of the fundamental rights of humans enshrined in the Qur'an; it is therefore, absurd for anyone to suggest that Islam allows putting people to death just because they convert to another religion.

Even a casual reader of the Qur'an will not fail to be impressed by its emphasis on the freedom of conscience as a cornerstone of its moral structure. To cite a few verses as follows:

[There shall be no compulsion in religion. Distinct has now become the right way from [the wayof] error: hence, he who rejects the powers of evil and believes in God has indeed taken hold of a support most unfailing, which shall never give way: for God is all-hearing, all-knowing] ( Al-Baqarah 2:256)

Your guys are more dramatic than mine, I'd say. They are Christians (http://answering-islam.org/about.html), however, not Muslims, and it seems that  they are modern missionaries to boot. They like the drama (http://answering-islam.org/anonymous.html), it seems. Hmm... I wonder, who should I trust?

How about wikipedia?

Quote from: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Apostasy_in_Islam
All five major schools of Islamic jurisprudence agree that a sane male apostate must be executed. A female apostate may be put to death, according to some schools, or imprisoned, according to others.

Quote
Some contemporary Shi'a jurists, scholars, writers and Islamic sects have argued or issued fatwas that either the changing of religion is not punishable or is only punishable under restricted circumstances, but these minority opinions have not found broad acceptance among Islamic scholars.[3][4][5][6][7]

While your guy may very well have a lot of merit in his argument, it remains that Muslim apostates must fear for their lives, since the majority Islamic view is that they must be killed.  Your guy is in the minority, and not representative of the situation as it stands.
Title: Re: Whiter Islam?
Post by: Peter on April 10, 2007, 02:11:10 PM
Quote from: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sharia#Muslim_apostates
In most interpretations of Sharia, conversion by Muslims to other religions, is strictly forbidden and is termed apostasy. Muslim theology equates apostasy to treason, and in most interpretations of sharia, the penalty for apostasy is death.

In many Muslim countries, the accusation of apostasy is even used against non-conventional interpretations of the Quran. The severe persecution of the famous expert in Arabic literature, Prof. Nasr Hamid Abu Zayd, is an example of this. In some countries, Sunni and Shia Muslims often accuse each other of apostasy. The current civil strife in Iraq is explained by many in terms of the extremely harsh religious opposition between Sunnis and Shias in Iraq.
Title: Re: Whiter Islam?
Post by: Peter on April 10, 2007, 02:21:47 PM
Quote from: http://www.religioustolerance.org/isl_apos.htm
"Whoever changes his religion shall be killed", Abu Dawud.

"Kill those who believe in many gods" Sura al-Tawba 9:5

"If a Muslim is found guilty of the crime of apostasy, either through words or through actions, he will be asked to repent during a three day period. If he has not repented within this time limit, he will be sentenced to death as an apostate and his property will be seized by the Revenue office. Every Muslim who refuses to pray will be asked to comply with the obligation to pray within the prescribed time limit. If he persists in his refusal, he will be punished by death." Article 306 of the Mauritanian Constitution

Quote
Islam teaches that a newborn has an innate ability to know and believe in his creator, and to understand good and evil. Muhammad (pbuh) stated: "Every child is born with the believing nature...it is his parents who make him into a Jew or a Christian." There is to be no force used to convert a non-believer to Islam. The Qur'ãn, quoted above, prohibits the use of compulsion to force a person or a society to accept Islam.

However, once a person freely "enters into the fold of Islam, the rules change." 4 The word "Islam" means "submission to the will of God." The Qur'ãn says that: "No believing man and no believing woman has a choice in their own affairs when Allãh and His Messenger have decided on an issue." (33:36) On the issue of apostasy, "Islam clearly says: No! You cannot become an apostate." 4 Apostasy is viewed as a form of treason.

In many predominately Muslim countries, the punishment for apostasy is death.

Assuming that the individual:
bullet   Was a Muslim
bullet   Openly rejects Islam,
bullet   Has made this decision freely and without coercion,
bullet   Is aware of the nature of his/her statements, and
bullet   Is an adult. then the penalty prescribed by Shari'a (Islamic) law is execution for men and life imprisonment for women. Drunkards and mentally ill persons are excluded from this punishment because they are considered to be not responsible for their statements.

A person born of a Muslim parent who later rejects Islam is called a "Murtad Fitri" (Apostate - natural). This is viewed a treason against God. They are given a second chance. If they repent of their decision, they will be released. A person who converted to Islam and later rejected the religion is a "Murtad Milli" (apostate - from the community.) This is viewed as treason against the community. Male apostates are executed even if they repent. Female apostates are released from imprisonment if they repent.

Additional factors:
bullet   If either spouse apostatize from Islam, a divorce is automatic.
bullet   If both apostatize they are generally allowed to stay married.
bullet   An under-aged male is imprisoned, and only executed if he remains an apostate when he becomes of age.
bullet   The will of a male apostate is not valid.
bullet   A female apostate's will remains valid.
bullet   In the rare instances when an apostate is executed, it is traditionally done by severing his neck with a sword.
bullet   Among Malikites, Shafi'ites, and Hanbalites, adult women receive the same penalty as men: execution.
bullet   The Shi'ite schools of law allow for Islamic law towards apostates to be applied in non-Muslim countries. The majority "Sunnites do not believe in extraterritorial jurisdiction." 4

Justification for the death penalty is mainly based on two Hadith texts:
bullet   "Whoever changes his religion shall be killed." (Abu Dawud)
bullet   "It is not lawful to kill a man who is a Muslim except for one of the three reasons: Kufr (disbelief) after accepting Islam....." (Abu Dawud).
Title: Re: Whiter Islam?
Post by: Peter on April 10, 2007, 02:27:00 PM
And a case study:

Quote from: http://www.timesonline.co.uk/tol/news/uk/article510589.ece
...
Yasmin, who was raised in the North of England, has been forced out of her town once, and is now trying to resist being chased out again. Brought up in a Muslim family, she converted after having a vision of Jesus when she gave birth to her youngest son, and was baptised in her thirties.. “My family completely disowned me. They thought I had committed the biggest sin — I was born a Muslim, and so I must die a Muslim. When my husband found out, he totally disowned my sons. One friend tried to strangle me when I told him I was converting,” she said.

“We had bricks though our windows, I was spat at in the street because they thought I was dishonouring Islam. We had to call the police so many times. I had to go to court to get an injunction against my husband because he was inciting others to attack me.”

She fled to another part of Britain, but the attacks soon started again as locals found out about her. “I wasn’t going to leave again,” she said, adding that it was the double standards of her attackers that made her most angry. “They are such hypocrites — they want us to be tolerant of everything they want, but they are intolerant of everything about us.”
...

Seems that whatever ideas of tolerance are being batted around in the universities, the status quo on the street is still that apostates are harassed and endangered, even in the UK.
Title: Re: Whiter Islam?
Post by: Peter on April 10, 2007, 02:31:59 PM
More from that article:

Quote
Although some are beaten “black and blue” for their faith, others suffer even more. The family of an 18-year-old girl whomYasmin was helping found that she had been hiding a Bible in her room, and visiting church secretly. “I tried to do as much as possible to help her, but they took her to Pakistan ‘on holiday’. Three weeks later, she was drowned — they said that she went out in the middle of the night and slipped in the river, but she just wouldn ’t have done that,” said Yasmin.

Ruth, also of Pakistani origin, found out recently that she had only just escaped being murdered. When she told her family that she had converted, they kept her locked inside the family home all summer.

“They were afraid I would meet some Christians. My brother was aggressive, and even hit me — I later found out he wanted me dead,” she said. A family friend had suggested taking her to Pakistan to kill her, and her brother put the idea to her mother, who ruled against it. “You are very isolated and very alone. But now, my brother is thinking about changing and a cousin has made a commitment to Christianity.”

Noor, from the Midlands, was brought up a Muslim but converted to Christianity at 21. “Telling my father was the most difficult thing I have ever done. I thought he would kill me on the spot, but he just went into a state of shock,” she said. He ended up almost kidnapping her.

“He took drastic actions — he took the family to Pakistan, to a secluded village with no roads to it. He kept us there for many years, putting pressure on me to leave my Christian faith. I endured mental and emotional suffering that most humans never reach,” she said. Eventually, her father realised that he could not shake her faith, and released her with strict conditions. “In desperation, my father threatened to take my life. If someone converts, it is a must for family honour to bring them back to Islam, if not, to kill them.”

Imams in Britain sometimes call on the apostates to be killed if they criticise their former religion. Anwar Sheikh, a former mosque teacher from Pakistan, became an atheist after coming to Britain, and now lives with a special alarm in his house in Cardiff after criticising Islam in a series of hardline books.

“I’ve had 18 fatwas against me. They telephone me — they aren’t foolhardy enough to put it in writing. I had a call a couple of weeks ago. They mean repent or be hanged,” he said. “What I have written, I believe and I will not take it back. I will suffer the consequences. If that is the price, I will pay it.”

The most high-profile British apostate is Ibn Warraq, a Pakistani-born intellectual and former teacher from London, who lost his faith after the Salman Rushdie affair and set out his reasons in the book Why I am not a Muslim.

He recently edited the book Leaving Islam, but finds it hard to explain the hostility. “It’s very strange. Even the most liberal Muslim can become incredibly fierce if you criticise Islam, or, horror of horrors, leave it.”

He himself has taken the precaution of using only a pseudonym, and lives incognito in mainland Europe. He thinks that Islamic apostasy is common. “In Western societies, it is probably 10-15 per cent. It’s very difficult to tell, because people don’t admit it.”

These are Muslims in the UK too; not in some Saudi shithole.
Title: Re: Whiter Islam?
Post by: McGiver on April 10, 2007, 02:39:59 PM
i wonder how this would play out in the US, where we have a clear seperation of church and state.

can a religious organization be charged with murder?
Title: Re: Whiter Islam?
Post by: odeon on April 10, 2007, 03:25:47 PM
It seems that you're a faster typist than I am, Peter... :P

First of all, my guyS. Plural form. I quoted two scholars.

It seems that the references aren't as conclusive as the Wikipedia article would have it. Your guy Heffening of Encyclopaedia of Islam, for example (the guy is, or at least was, a Western scholar), seems to hold the opinion that the punishment is in the afterlife only (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Abrahamic_religion#Proselytism):

Quote
W. Heffening states that in Qur'an "the apostate is threatened with punishment in the next world only" however "in traditions, there is little echo of these punishments in the next world ... and instead, we have in many traditions a new element, the death penalty."

Not as conclusive as the article but I'd agree that there is doubt, and yes, several Islamic nations ("Saudi Arabia, Yemen, Iran, Sudan, Afghanistan, Mauritania, the Comoros and, most likely, Iraq", according to Wikipedia (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Apostasy#Islam)) do have death penalty for apostasy. OTOH, Egypt, to pick but one other Muslim nation (about 90% Muslims, ca 70 million people, that is, about ), claim to have freedom of religion but seem to make it tough for minority religions other than Islam, Christianity and--yes--Judaism. They do not have death penalty for apostasy, though.

Here's another Wikipedia quote (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Criticism_of_Islam#Contemporary_treatment_of_accused_apostates) :

Quote
Today, out of 57 mostly Islamic countries in OIC, five make apostasy from Islam a crime punishable by death, including Afghanistan, Saudi Arabia, Iran, Sudan, and Yemen. However, according the US State Department, there have been no reports of such executions by the government of Saudi Arabia for several years.[53] On the other hand, in Pakistan, vigilante attacks against alleged apostates are common.[54]

To me, five out of 57, while worrying and just as wrong as any threat against freedom of speech, religion or any other (in my view) inalienable human right, doesn't present a convincing case. Indeed most Wikipedia articles and the articles referenced, specifically point out that the Qu'ran does not impose the death penalty for apostasy.

I'm well aware of the persecution of some converts--these cases tend to be highly publicized throughout the Western world even though, shocking as they may be, they are few in number when compared to, for example, plain old domestic violence. The headlines for the latter, unfortunately, are utterly boring because there's no clear-cut bad guy, no-one to blame right away.

My first reaction, however, was against Omega Male's statement, "In the sharia penalty for Muslims converting to another religion is death, which explains why many Muslim converts to Christianity keep quiet", and the truth just isn't that simple.