INTENSITY²

Start here => Free For ALL => Topic started by: Sock Puppet Assassin on February 06, 2007, 09:47:40 AM

Title: This has to be.............
Post by: Sock Puppet Assassin on February 06, 2007, 09:47:40 AM
Would someone mind fessing up to the ownership of the sock puppet "Parrottesgirl"

I know it's not officially one because the person used a different computer, but the IP address has to be coming from the same area as a regular member. :police:
Title: Re: This has to be.............
Post by: McGiver on February 06, 2007, 09:50:19 AM
who wants a cracker?
Title: Re: This has to be.............
Post by: SovaNu on February 06, 2007, 10:24:35 AM
polly. :P
Title: Re: This has to be.............
Post by: Callaway on February 06, 2007, 10:43:02 AM
Would someone mind fessing up to the ownership of the sock puppet "Parrottesgirl"

I know it's not officially one because the person used a different computer, but the IP address has to be coming from the same area as a regular member. :police:

You want the kid gloves off, "Sock Puppet Assassin"?  This is the stupidest post that I have seen yet on Intensity.  Just because you don't like someone's views, you accuse them of being somebody's sock puppet?  How would you know whether or not the IP address matches or the person is using a different computer?

To the best of my knowledge, Parrottesgirl is not a sockpuppet.

 :grrr:
Title: Re: This has to be.............
Post by: McGiver on February 06, 2007, 11:01:48 AM
i was wondering the same thing.
Title: Re: This has to be.............
Post by: SovaNu on February 06, 2007, 11:04:35 AM
i was wondering since when did we get a sockpuppet sockpuppetassassin. also if someone posts from the same general area as another, they could be two different people living, dingdingding, in the same area!
Title: Re: This has to be.............
Post by: DirtDawg on February 06, 2007, 01:33:17 PM
Would someone mind fessing up to the ownership of the sock puppet "Parrottesgirl"

I know it's not officially one because the person used a different computer, but the IP address has to be coming from the same area as a regular member. :police:

You want the kid gloves off, "Sock Puppet Assassin"?  This is the stupidest post that I have seen yet on Intensity.  Just because you don't like someone's views, you accuse them of being somebody's sock puppet?  How would you know whether or not the IP address matches or the person is using a different computer?

To the best of my knowledge, Parrottesgirl is not a sockpuppet.

 :grrr:


(See, now I'm wondering if "Sock Puppet Assassin" is one of Callaway's sockpuppets and she is just bored.)


:laugh:
Title: Re: This has to be.............
Post by: Litigious on February 06, 2007, 01:35:24 PM
It's a sockpuppet but it's not Callaway's sockpuppet.
Title: Re: This has to be.............
Post by: SovaNu on February 06, 2007, 01:36:19 PM
it's Litigious' sock puppet then!
Title: Re: This has to be.............
Post by: The_P on February 06, 2007, 01:37:16 PM
Would someone mind fessing up to the ownership of the sock puppet "Parrottesgirl"

I know it's not officially one because the person used a different computer, but the IP address has to be coming from the same area as a regular member. :police:

This author is lame.
Title: Re: This has to be.............
Post by: Litigious on February 06, 2007, 01:37:57 PM
it's Litigious' sock puppet then!

No, but of course I know whos sockpuppet it is.
Title: Re: This has to be.............
Post by: SovaNu on February 06, 2007, 01:39:30 PM
puppeteers always claim to know the puppeteer who they claim is not them.
Title: Re: This has to be.............
Post by: Litigious on February 06, 2007, 01:41:39 PM
Since I can see IP adresses and this person doesn't use a proxy server, it's really no problem at all to see who it is.
Title: Re: This has to be.............
Post by: DirtDawg on February 06, 2007, 01:42:34 PM
it's Litigious' sock puppet then!

No, but of course I know whos sockpuppet it is.

... and their secret is safe with you, right?  :laugh:

No on else could possibly know or figure it out on their own, right?  ::)
Title: Re: This has to be.............
Post by: SovaNu on February 06, 2007, 01:43:56 PM
what the first letter in their name?
Title: Re: This has to be.............
Post by: Litigious on February 06, 2007, 01:45:51 PM
what the first letter in their name?

Sorry, I've promised not to reveal it.  8)
Title: Re: This has to be.............
Post by: SovaNu on February 06, 2007, 01:50:25 PM
of course, mr kent. ::) you are such a loyal friend. ::) you would never reveal your "friend's" identity. :P
Title: Re: This has to be.............
Post by: Litigious on February 06, 2007, 01:53:27 PM
Why should it be my sockpuppet? I've never had any sockpuppets on Intensity. Ask some of the other admins; they can tell you that it isn't my sockpuppet.
Title: Re: This has to be.............
Post by: SovaNu on February 06, 2007, 01:58:43 PM
we believe you, Clarke. say, isn't it strange i don't recall you and your friend ever being in the same room together at the same time... ::) wonder why that is. :P
Title: Re: This has to be.............
Post by: Callaway on February 06, 2007, 01:59:55 PM
Would someone mind fessing up to the ownership of the sock puppet "Parrottesgirl"

I know it's not officially one because the person used a different computer, but the IP address has to be coming from the same area as a regular member. :police:

You want the kid gloves off, "Sock Puppet Assassin"?  This is the stupidest post that I have seen yet on Intensity.  Just because you don't like someone's views, you accuse them of being somebody's sock puppet?  How would you know whether or not the IP address matches or the person is using a different computer?

To the best of my knowledge, Parrottesgirl is not a sockpuppet.

 :grrr:


(See, now I'm wondering if "Sock Puppet Assassin" is one of Callaway's sockpuppets and she is just bored.)


:laugh:

That would have been really funny, but no, I'm not "Sock Puppet Assassin".  

I was just ticked off because a sockpuppet of a member who has more sockpuppets than anyone else here (unless Alex is around) was calling someone else a sockpuppet for disagreeing with the member's views, which is especially ironic when the alleged sockpuppet is a newbie and not a sockpuppet at all.  

It is definitely not Litigious, either.  We aren't supposed to reveal the identity of sockpuppets who post here, because we can see IP addresses.
Title: Re: This has to be.............
Post by: SovaNu on February 06, 2007, 02:01:04 PM
if you say so, Lois Lane. :P
Title: Re: This has to be.............
Post by: Litigious on February 06, 2007, 02:04:02 PM
if you say so, Lois Lane. :P

You're pwned, Milla Banana Split.  8)
Title: Re: This has to be.............
Post by: Callaway on February 06, 2007, 02:09:18 PM
if you say so, Lois Lane. :P

 :green:

If I had not just plussed everyone in this thread except for the sockpuppet, I would have plussed you for this.

Seriously, it is not Litigious or me. 

I'll bet you have already figured out who the sockpuppet really is.  I think DirtDawg has too.
Title: Re: This has to be.............
Post by: SovaNu on February 06, 2007, 02:11:39 PM
i know it's not him, i was teasing. :green:

i have one idea who it could be, no clue if i'm right unfortunately.
Title: Re: This has to be.............
Post by: purposefulinsanity on February 06, 2007, 03:19:37 PM
The question is whether a guest poster is a really considered a sock puppet or not.
Title: Re: This has to be.............
Post by: McGiver on February 06, 2007, 04:02:00 PM
ok.

there is no discussion about this in the admin forum, so i can venture a guess.

is it me?



and no PI, i believe that a member posting as a guest is not a sock puppet.
Title: Re: This has to be.............
Post by: QuirkyCarla on February 06, 2007, 04:17:25 PM
Parottes girl is not a sock puppet, moron.

Would someone mind fessing up to the ownership of the sock puppet "Parrottesgirl"

I know it's not officially one because the person used a different computer, but the IP address has to be coming from the same area as a regular member. :police:

This author is lame.

Agreed. +
Title: Re: This has to be.............
Post by: QuirkyCarla on February 06, 2007, 04:18:16 PM
what the first letter in their name?

s
Title: Re: This has to be.............
Post by: SovaNu on February 06, 2007, 04:19:20 PM
thanks Carla :P +

or wait, you don't mean the name sock puppet assassin do you? :P
Title: Re: This has to be.............
Post by: McGiver on February 06, 2007, 04:23:15 PM
this just in:

it wasn't me afterall.
Title: Re: This has to be.............
Post by: QuirkyCarla on February 06, 2007, 04:24:39 PM
no, i didn't mean the name sock puppet assassin  :laugh:

the person isn't a sock puppet though so you won't be able to figure it out by the first letter of their name...
Title: Re: This has to be.............
Post by: SovaNu on February 06, 2007, 04:25:18 PM
hmph :P
Title: Re: This has to be.............
Post by: SovaNu on February 06, 2007, 04:26:17 PM
it's Scrap! :P
Title: Re: This has to be.............
Post by: QuirkyCarla on February 06, 2007, 04:49:18 PM
 :laugh:

no, but sock puppet assassin probably is...sounds like his moronic dribble  ;D
Title: Re: This has to be.............
Post by: El on February 06, 2007, 04:52:09 PM
S for Serissa.  It's me.   :green:
Title: Re: This has to be.............
Post by: McGiver on February 06, 2007, 05:08:42 PM
S for Serissa.  It's me.   :green:

is it really?

because when i said that it was me, i found out later that i was wrong....
Title: Re: This has to be.............
Post by: odeon on February 06, 2007, 05:38:42 PM
S for Serissa.  It's me.   :green:

It's you? :o
Title: Re: This has to be.............
Post by: purposefulinsanity on February 06, 2007, 06:04:39 PM
I'm pretty sure it was me sleep-posting again.
Title: Re: This has to be.............
Post by: McGiver on February 06, 2007, 06:09:33 PM
we may never know!
Title: Re: This has to be.............
Post by: QuirkyCarla on February 06, 2007, 06:14:30 PM
I know.  >:D
Title: Re: This has to be.............
Post by: McGiver on February 06, 2007, 06:18:16 PM
I know.  >:D
is it you?
Title: Re: This has to be.............
Post by: odeon on February 06, 2007, 06:19:20 PM
Who cares who it is? I don't.
Title: Re: This has to be.............
Post by: McGiver on February 06, 2007, 06:25:06 PM
Who cares who it is? I don't.
:upyours:

easy for you to say. :bssign:

since you know who it is :STFU:
Title: Re: This has to be.............
Post by: QuirkyCarla on February 06, 2007, 07:08:58 PM
I know.  >:D
is it you?

Nope. If it was me it would be a sock puppet, wouldn't it? As I said, it's not a sock puppet.
Title: Re: This has to be.............
Post by: Sock Puppet Assassin on February 06, 2007, 08:47:14 PM

You want the kid gloves off, "Sock Puppet Assassin"?  This is the stupidest post that I have seen yet on Intensity.  Just because you don't like someone's views, you accuse them of being somebody's sock puppet?  How would you know whether or not the IP address matches or the person is using a different computer?

To the best of my knowledge, Parrottesgirl is not a sockpuppet.

 :grrr:




Quote
I was just ticked off because a sockpuppet of a member who has more sockpuppets than anyone else here (unless Alex is around) was calling someone else a sockpuppet for disagreeing with the member's views, which is especially ironic when the alleged sockpuppet is a newbie and not a sockpuppet at all.  



2 things.

1) Postining anonymously on this board doesn't constitute having a sock pupet. Making multiple accounts is. (Q comes to mind, "Q" IS a sock pupet or test account as Admin likes to call it)

2) I believe parrottesgirl to be a sock pupet based on the fact that "she" jumped in the middle of a debate between established members and never posted again. There's also other oddities that I've noticed about that account. So............................................................doe somebody want to come clean or play sharades??
Title: Re: This has to be.............
Post by: Callaway on February 06, 2007, 08:59:29 PM
1)  I think one member posting anonymously on this board under many different user names is the same thing as having sockpuppets, but I can see why you would disagree, since you are the one who keeps doing it.

2)  I will say again that as far as I know, Parrottesgirl is not a sockpuppet and I am in a better position to know whether or not she is than you are.  I will not divulge private information about a member.  Who knows why she did not post again?  Maybe she was interested in only one debate?  Maybe the response she got in that debate scared her away?  That does not make her a sockpuppet.
Title: Re: This has to be.............
Post by: McGiver on February 06, 2007, 09:15:37 PM
so who is this one:
pyraxis?
Title: Re: This has to be.............
Post by: odeon on February 07, 2007, 01:51:04 AM
As Callaway said, the information about that member is private. As I would say, that's for me to know and you to find out. :P

2) I believe parrottesgirl to be a sock pupet based on the fact that "she" jumped in the middle of a debate between established members and never posted again. There's also other oddities that I've noticed about that account. So............................................................doe somebody want to come clean or play sharades??

It took you some time to react. Why?

And what are the other "oddities"?
Title: Re: This has to be.............
Post by: SovaNu on February 07, 2007, 02:27:28 AM
maybe he had to go change his clothes in a phone booth. :P
Title: Re: This has to be.............
Post by: Mr Smith on February 07, 2007, 03:42:25 AM
Tell us who the goddamn sock puppet is, we didn't come to a board owned by it's members to be treated as inferiors while the "admins" withhold the information.

Also the its sock puppet's own fault if they get humiliated, it was their stupid idea to make it in the first place.
Title: Re: This has to be.............
Post by: DirtDawg on February 07, 2007, 04:03:09 AM
Tell us who the goddamn sock puppet is, we didn't come to a board owned by it's members to be treated as inferiors while the "admins" withhold the information.

Also the its sock puppet's own fault if they get humiliated, it was their stupid idea to make it in the first place.
Do you really not know, or are you just making a point?

Either way, maybe we could continue in the spirit of the thread and have all sockpuppets "fess up", right here, right now.

 :venere:

 :shitfan:

Title: Re: This has to be.............
Post by: purposefulinsanity on February 07, 2007, 04:04:19 AM
The issue is that when the Free for all forum was set up it was done so to allow people to make suggestions about site improvement without fear of getting shit for it (although I personally believe it is rarely used in that way).   When it was set up it was made clear that posters in here could not be outed by the the admins.

I personally think that if people have something to say they should have the balls to say it with their real account, I find hiding behind a guest poster ID anti-Intensity, but if even I could see IP addresses I wouldn't out them because it was agreed that staff wouldn't do that.

If you dislike guests being allowed to post start a vote to see what other people's feelings are on this.
Title: Re: This has to be.............
Post by: odeon on February 07, 2007, 04:12:22 AM
Parrottesgirl is not a sock puppet, to the best of my knowledge. End of story. I'd not have revealed her identity if she'd been one, though, since it's a policy decided by the members.

As for revealing the identities of guests posting in the Free for All forum, sorry, can't help you there. This, again, is a member-decided policy, if I'm not mistaken. It's allowed to post anonymously in that forum.

So in neither case am I--or any other admin--treating you as inferiors. I am merely following the rules. If you want to change how we handle sock puppets, set up a discussion thread and a vote.

EDIT: PI posted her comment right before mine, but I decided to post mine anyway since we say the same thing, essentially, which is a Good Thing.
Title: Re: This has to be.............
Post by: purposefulinsanity on February 07, 2007, 04:18:41 AM
I don't think the policy on outing guest posters was member decided, as far as I can remember it was decided upon by the admin staff at the time.

http://www.intensitysquared.com/index.php?topic=525.0 (http://www.intensitysquared.com/index.php?topic=525.0)

I think there's some confusion going on here (or is it just me that's confused? lol) as to whether we're talking about sock puppets or guest posters. Are we talking about outing the 'alleged' sock puppet this thread was started about or are we talking about outing the person who started the thread?

Sock puppets- current members who set up a different account usually to shit stir.
Guest posters- usually current members who post under an alias without logging in.
Title: Re: This has to be.............
Post by: Litigious on February 07, 2007, 04:27:19 AM
Too bad, blobby. You'll have to find out on your own.  8)
Title: Re: This has to be.............
Post by: Callaway on February 07, 2007, 09:21:07 AM
Tell us who the goddamn sock puppet is, we didn't come to a board owned by it's members to be treated as inferiors while the "admins" withhold the information.

Also the its sock puppet's own fault if they get humiliated, it was their stupid idea to make it in the first place.

Parrottesgirl is not a sockpuppet to the best of my knowledge, Fatty McBlob.  The OP is mistaken about that.  If she were a sockpuppet, she would be marked as one.  Whether she was a sockpuppet or not, her private account information would be private, unless she decided to make it public.  It would be wrong of me to reveal her IP address or email address or other private information that makes me believe that she is not a sockpuppet, just like it would be wrong for me to reveal yours.

In my opinion, the OP should grow a pair and post under his actual member name instead of hiding behind all these "secret identities", but, as Purposeful Insanity points out, under the current rules, he is free to post here anonymously under multiple names and the people who can see his IP address are not supposed to out him. 

You have a very good point about Intensity being run by its members, however.  If you think this rule is wrong, you could start a poll.
Title: Re: This has to be.............
Post by: Leto729 on February 07, 2007, 10:48:25 AM
Its Me, Its Me, Its Me.....Aaaaaaarrrrrggg...........
Title: Re: This has to be.............
Post by: SovaNu on February 07, 2007, 11:25:26 AM
sure it is. ::)
Title: Re: This has to be.............
Post by: McGiver on February 07, 2007, 11:43:37 AM
no i am more confusicalled than ever
Title: Re: This has to be.............
Post by: Leto729 on February 07, 2007, 12:19:49 PM
no i am more confusicalled than ever
Aren't You always. :laugh:

Also My 6566th post >:D
Title: Re: This has to be.............
Post by: QuirkyCarla on February 07, 2007, 03:39:05 PM
It's obvious the OP is Scrapheap.
Title: Re: This has to be.............
Post by: McGiver on February 07, 2007, 04:10:53 PM
wait.

kevv said that it was him....
Title: Re: This has to be.............
Post by: purposefulinsanity on February 07, 2007, 04:36:38 PM
I found out it was actually my left nipple- it decided to do some postwhoring whilst I was watching tv.
Title: Re: This has to be.............
Post by: McGiver on February 07, 2007, 09:00:53 PM
time to tie with anipple clamp.

bad nippe, bad!
Title: Re: This has to be.............
Post by: duncvis on February 07, 2007, 09:03:18 PM
You can't blame the nip, it was bored. I just gave it some attention, so it should behave on the board for a while. Or will it? :boobs: :eyebrows:
Title: Re: This has to be.............
Post by: McGiver on February 07, 2007, 09:08:49 PM
You can't blame the nip, it was bored. I just gave it some attention, so it should behave on the board for a while. Or will it? :boobs: :eyebrows:

erect, would you say they are:

a.
      |__|


b.
    |     |
    |___|



c. 
     |         |
     |_____|
Title: Re: This has to be.............
Post by: duncvis on February 07, 2007, 09:13:50 PM
I'd breast keep that information close to my chest. :eyebrows:
Title: Re: This has to be.............
Post by: McGiver on February 07, 2007, 09:21:41 PM
emo fucking hippie!
Title: Re: This has to be.............
Post by: DirtDawg on February 07, 2007, 09:22:57 PM
You can't blame the nip, it was bored. I just gave it some attention, so it should behave on the board for a while. Or will it? :boobs: :eyebrows:

erect, would you say they are:

a.
      |__|


b.
    |     |
    |___|



c. 
     |         |
     |_____|

Interesting thing about it, is that it may have been a lefty, but it types better than you.
Title: Re: This has to be.............
Post by: ozymandias on February 07, 2007, 09:24:26 PM
Dammit, I'm having all these quips running thru my mind, but, they won't hold still long enough for me to catch and post them. >:(