INTENSITY²
Politics, Mature and taboo => Political Pundits => Topic started by: Yuri Bezmenov on June 29, 2018, 06:43:53 PM
-
Can you believe this stupid, entitled, feckless cunt??
She calls for Trump administration officials and their families to be harassed, intimidated and bullied in public.
Now she has to cancel events because she's receiving threats of harassment if she goes out in public.
This is the shit that you do when you think that your genitals and skin color protect you from your own stupidity.
https://www.washingtonpost.com/politics/rep-maxine-waters-cancels-events-due-to-very-serious-death-threat/2018/06/28/b5aca1c0-7b1c-11e8-80be-6d32e182a3bc_story.html?noredirect=on&utm_term=.2ae7409873b2
(http://az616578.vo.msecnd.net/files/2016/05/20/635993689613695234798865864_26-backward%20gun.jpg)
-
Can you believe this stupid, entitled, feckless cunt??
She calls for Trump administration officials and their families to be harassed, intimidated and bullied in public.
Now she has to cancel events because she's receiving threats of harassment if she goes out in public.
This is the shit that you do when you think that your genitals and skin color protect you from your own stupidity.
https://www.washingtonpost.com/politics/rep-maxine-waters-cancels-events-due-to-very-serious-death-threat/2018/06/28/b5aca1c0-7b1c-11e8-80be-6d32e182a3bc_story.html?noredirect=on&utm_term=.2ae7409873b2
(http://az616578.vo.msecnd.net/files/2016/05/20/635993689613695234798865864_26-backward%20gun.jpg)
Mad Maxine deserves all she gets and more
-
US Representative Maxine Waters (D-CA) fearlessly warned would-be assassins on Saturday that if they intend to target her, they 'better shoot straight.'
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=iK40YWrVqxY
-
US Representative Maxine Waters (D-CA) fearlessly warned would-be assassins on Saturday that if they intend to target her, they 'better shoot straight.'
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=iK40YWrVqxY
Pretending she is at risk of being assassinated
-
https://edition.cnn.com/2018/06/28/politics/maxine-waters-threatened/index.html
-
^^^ This is what passes for journalistic research and evidence these days.
"A black woman said it therefore it must be true". ::)
-
^^^ This is what passes for journalistic research and evidence these days.
"A black woman said it therefore it must be true". ::)
I'm sorry, did you prove that it was false somewhere? I must have missed it.
-
https://edition.cnn.com/2018/06/28/politics/maxine-waters-threatened/index.html
She just got a lot of blowback and angry people giving her shit. She just wants to paint herself as a victim. It is crybullying
-
https://edition.cnn.com/2018/06/28/politics/maxine-waters-threatened/index.html
She just got a lot of blowback and angry people giving her shit. She just wants to paint herself as a victim. It is crybullying
Didn't Scrap just imply that the article was false? You two are just so confusing.
-
https://edition.cnn.com/2018/06/28/politics/maxine-waters-threatened/index.html
She just got a lot of blowback and angry people giving her shit. She just wants to paint herself as a victim. It is crybullying
Didn't Scrap just imply that the article was false? You two are just so confusing.
I said she just got a lot of blowback and Scrap said the article selling the narrative that she is a victim of threats to her life.
You are confused between you believe those two positions are both murually exclusive and.confusing?
-
https://edition.cnn.com/2018/06/28/politics/maxine-waters-threatened/index.html
She just got a lot of blowback and angry people giving her shit. She just wants to paint herself as a victim. It is crybullying
Didn't Scrap just imply that the article was false? You two are just so confusing.
I said she just got a lot of blowback and Scrap said the article selling the narrative that she is a victim of threats to her life.
You are confused between you believe those two positions are both murually exclusive and.confusing?
I'm so sorry. You two just seem like twins.
But do carry on. You are both hugely entertaining.
-
https://edition.cnn.com/2018/06/28/politics/maxine-waters-threatened/index.html
She just got a lot of blowback and angry people giving her shit. She just wants to paint herself as a victim. It is crybullying
Didn't Scrap just imply that the article was false? You two are just so confusing.
I said she just got a lot of blowback and Scrap said the article selling the narrative that she is a victim of threats to her life.
You are confused between you believe those two positions are both murually exclusive and.confusing?
I'm so sorry. You two just seem like twins.
But do carry on. You are both hugely entertaining.
I will ask again. "I said she just got a lot of blowback and Scrap said the article selling the narrative that she is a victim of threats to her life is false". How are these confusing positions and better yet how are they wrong? How does Scrap's position invalidate mine?
-
Have a think and get back to me. No hurry.
-
Have a think and get back to me. No hurry.
No. There is no disparity and you just do not have the cognitive skills you believe you have, to think it through.
-
Don't worry Odeon, I don't have the cognitive skills to understand Al's posts either. :P
-
That's because you need only half a brain. lol...
-
I blame my half a brain on misbegotten youth. :zoinks:
-
She was wrong to call for harassment of opposition. Our country is based upon finding a way to disagree among each other and still keep the freedoms of all involved.
I can also say that any of those liberal types who have already given up on trying to work things out can just ... I do not know ... You tell me. You are the ones who have gone nuts.
If one does not like what is going on in Washington, DC then hit the polls during the next election cycle. This is how it works and it has worked fairly well for a couple of centuries, and then some.
On this day of our declaration, I am very proud of my country. Do not even try to fuck with me over past failures to live up to what we declared ... we are trying to get it right! We will get it right!!
Here it is:
IN CONGRESS, JULY 4, 1776
The unanimous Declaration of the thirteen united States of America
When in the Course of human events it becomes necessary for one people to dissolve the political bands which have connected them with another and to assume among the powers of the earth, the separate and equal station to which the Laws of Nature and of Nature's God entitle them, a decent respect to the opinions of mankind requires that they should declare the causes which impel them to the separation.
We hold these truths to be self-evident, that all men are created equal, that they are endowed by their Creator with certain unalienable Rights, that among these are Life, Liberty and the pursuit of Happiness. — That to secure these rights, Governments are instituted among Men, deriving their just powers from the consent of the governed, — That whenever any Form of Government becomes destructive of these ends, it is the Right of the People to alter or to abolish it, and to institute new Government, laying its foundation on such principles and organizing its powers in such form, as to them shall seem most likely to effect their Safety and Happiness. Prudence, indeed, will dictate that Governments long established should not be changed for light and transient causes; and accordingly all experience hath shewn that mankind are more disposed to suffer, while evils are sufferable than to right themselves by abolishing the forms to which they are accustomed. But when a long train of abuses and usurpations, pursuing invariably the same Object evinces a design to reduce them under absolute Despotism, it is their right, it is their duty, to throw off such Government, and to provide new Guards for their future security. — Such has been the patient sufferance of these Colonies; and such is now the necessity which constrains them to alter their former Systems of Government. The history of the present King of Great Britain is a history of repeated injuries and usurpations, all having in direct object the establishment of an absolute Tyranny over these States. To prove this, let Facts be submitted to a candid world.
He has refused his Assent to Laws, the most wholesome and necessary for the public good.
He has forbidden his Governors to pass Laws of immediate and pressing importance, unless suspended in their operation till his Assent should be obtained; and when so suspended, he has utterly neglected to attend to them.
He has refused to pass other Laws for the accommodation of large districts of people, unless those people would relinquish the right of Representation in the Legislature, a right inestimable to them and formidable to tyrants only.
He has called together legislative bodies at places unusual, uncomfortable, and distant from the depository of their Public Records, for the sole purpose of fatiguing them into compliance with his measures.
He has dissolved Representative Houses repeatedly, for opposing with manly firmness his invasions on the rights of the people.
He has refused for a long time, after such dissolutions, to cause others to be elected, whereby the Legislative Powers, incapable of Annihilation, have returned to the People at large for their exercise; the State remaining in the mean time exposed to all the dangers of invasion from without, and convulsions within.
He has endeavoured to prevent the population of these States; for that purpose obstructing the Laws for Naturalization of Foreigners; refusing to pass others to encourage their migrations hither, and raising the conditions of new Appropriations of Lands.
He has obstructed the Administration of Justice by refusing his Assent to Laws for establishing Judiciary Powers.
He has made Judges dependent on his Will alone for the tenure of their offices, and the amount and payment of their salaries.
He has erected a multitude of New Offices, and sent hither swarms of Officers to harass our people and eat out their substance.
He has kept among us, in times of peace, Standing Armies without the Consent of our legislatures.
He has affected to render the Military independent of and superior to the Civil Power.
He has combined with others to subject us to a jurisdiction foreign to our constitution, and unacknowledged by our laws; giving his Assent to their Acts of pretended Legislation:
For quartering large bodies of armed troops among us:
For protecting them, by a mock Trial from punishment for any Murders which they should commit on the Inhabitants of these States:
For cutting off our Trade with all parts of the world:
For imposing Taxes on us without our Consent:
For depriving us in many cases, of the benefit of Trial by Jury:
For transporting us beyond Seas to be tried for pretended offences:
For abolishing the free System of English Laws in a neighbouring Province, establishing therein an Arbitrary government, and enlarging its Boundaries so as to render it at once an example and fit instrument for introducing the same absolute rule into these Colonies
For taking away our Charters, abolishing our most valuable Laws and altering fundamentally the Forms of our Governments:
For suspending our own Legislatures, and declaring themselves invested with power to legislate for us in all cases whatsoever.
He has abdicated Government here, by declaring us out of his Protection and waging War against us.
He has plundered our seas, ravaged our coasts, burnt our towns, and destroyed the lives of our people.
He is at this time transporting large Armies of foreign Mercenaries to compleat the works of death, desolation, and tyranny, already begun with circumstances of Cruelty & Perfidy scarcely paralleled in the most barbarous ages, and totally unworthy the Head of a civilized nation.
He has constrained our fellow Citizens taken Captive on the high Seas to bear Arms against their Country, to become the executioners of their friends and Brethren, or to fall themselves by their Hands.
He has excited domestic insurrections amongst us, and has endeavoured to bring on the inhabitants of our frontiers, the merciless Indian Savages whose known rule of warfare, is an undistinguished destruction of all ages, sexes and conditions.
In every stage of these Oppressions We have Petitioned for Redress in the most humble terms: Our repeated Petitions have been answered only by repeated injury. A Prince, whose character is thus marked by every act which may define a Tyrant, is unfit to be the ruler of a free people.
Nor have We been wanting in attentions to our British brethren. We have warned them from time to time of attempts by their legislature to extend an unwarrantable jurisdiction over us. We have reminded them of the circumstances of our emigration and settlement here. We have appealed to their native justice and magnanimity, and we have conjured them by the ties of our common kindred to disavow these usurpations, which would inevitably interrupt our connections and correspondence. They too have been deaf to the voice of justice and of consanguinity. We must, therefore, acquiesce in the necessity, which denounces our Separation, and hold them, as we hold the rest of mankind, Enemies in War, in Peace Friends.
We, therefore, the Representatives of the united States of America, in General Congress, Assembled, appealing to the Supreme Judge of the world for the rectitude of our intentions, do, in the Name, and by Authority of the good People of these Colonies, solemnly publish and declare, That these united Colonies are, and of Right ought to be Free and Independent States, that they are Absolved from all Allegiance to the British Crown, and that all political connection between them and the State of Great Britain, is and ought to be totally dissolved; and that as Free and Independent States, they have full Power to levy War, conclude Peace, contract Alliances, establish Commerce, and to do all other Acts and Things which Independent States may of right do. — And for the support of this Declaration, with a firm reliance on the protection of Divine Providence, we mutually pledge to each other our Lives, our Fortunes, and our sacred Honor.
-
Nuff said. right?
... unless one of you snowflakes are going to tell me that you are more eloquent and possibly smarter than one of the founding fathers of this great nation.
-
Looks like a receipt for drama. Whatever system you choose, it's still going to result in you lot killing each other or yourselves. Carry on America, carry on.
-
Looks like a receipt for drama. Whatever system you choose, it's still going to result in you lot killing each other or yourselves. Carry on America, carry on.
Already tried that over a century ago. Probably won't go that way again.
Goodbye, Snowflake.
-
At least you have yourself. Babe.
If you want to be a weapon, go ahead. No one stopping you.
-
Don't worry Odeon, I don't have the cognitive skills to understand Al's posts either. :P
Nobody does, including Al.
-
Don't worry Odeon, I don't have the cognitive skills to understand Al's posts either. :P
Nobody does, including Al.
Is this the part where you say..."Even though I literly said that, I mean..."
-
The problem is that you don't understand anyone, including yourself. A case in point is your new sig.
-
The problem is that you don't understand anyone, including yourself. A case in point is your new sig.
Your theory of mind comes nowhere close to knowing what goes on in my head, or what I believe or do not, and your ability to comprehend what I (and others) write is severely limited.
You project your flaws to everyone else. You pretend to be strong in areas you are very weak in. You are a joke.
-
It's fairly obvious that very little is actually going on in your head, but do carry on. Cunt.
-
It's fairly obvious that very little is actually going on in your head, but do carry on. Cunt.
Bit of Projection there. "I know what you are but what am I?" Fine bit of argument tactic up to the age of 11. Most of us outgrow it. That Signature really upset you didn't it? Good.
-
At least you have yourself. Babe.
If you want to be a weapon, go ahead. No one stopping you.
You know we did have to tell the ignorant British fucks of that age more than once to fuck off.
We still mean it. Your mettle will not hold, here.
-
He has excited domestic insurrections amongst us, and has endeavoured to bring on the inhabitants of our frontiers, the merciless Indian Savages whose known rule of warfare, is an undistinguished destruction of all ages, sexes and conditions.
This passage got some people on Facebook in trouble because their algorithms identified it as "hate speech".
-
He has excited domestic insurrections amongst us, and has endeavoured to bring on the inhabitants of our frontiers, the merciless Indian Savages whose known rule of warfare, is an undistinguished destruction of all ages, sexes and conditions.
This passage got some people on Facebook in trouble because their algorithms identified it as "hate speech".
I say, "Read it and weep. " If you need to. While I can not justify much of what was done to many of the natives in this land, we tried to be civil, then in order to face a warlike people factions of the time met them with similar abandon.
Would we do things differently, today? Fuckin'A! We would do things differently. We can not undo the past, but to call our Declaration Of Independence hate speech is to ignore the actual historical content.
:yawn:
-
I agree, you needed your independence from life because it was hurting you. Now that you have your own lives, go back to serving god amongst your violent selves. Make a sacrifice, as I only know too well that it is fucking with you.
-
I agree, you needed your independence from life because it was hurting you. Now that you have your own lives, go back to serving god amongst your violent selves. Make a sacrifice, as I only know too well that it is fucking with you.
160 more posts, dumbarse
-
Cum at me bro. I'm sure your daughter would want to watch you fuckup, fucking up.
-
Cum at me bro. I'm sure your daughter would want to watch you fuckup, fucking up.
158 more posts, dipshit
-
I agree, you needed your independence from life because it was hurting you. Now that you have your own lives, go back to serving god amongst your violent selves. Make a sacrifice, as I only know too well that it is fucking with you.
You are no longer making sense.
-
Why? Are your senses fucking with you too?
-
I agree, you needed your independence from life because it was hurting you. Now that you have your own lives, go back to serving god amongst your violent selves. Make a sacrifice, as I only know too well that it is fucking with you.
You are no longer making sense.
:scratchhead:
mdanglerlimpdick has only occasionally made sense. I can count the times he made sense on one hand, with fingers left over.
-
I agree, you needed your independence from life because it was hurting you. Now that you have your own lives, go back to serving god amongst your violent selves. Make a sacrifice, as I only know too well that it is fucking with you.
You are no longer making sense.
:scratchhead:
mdanglerlimpdick has only occasionally made sense. I can count the times he made sense on one hand, with fingers left over.
:laugh: :laugh:
-
It's fairly obvious that very little is actually going on in your head, but do carry on. Cunt.
Bit of Projection there. "I know what you are but what am I?" Fine bit of argument tactic up to the age of 11. Most of us outgrow it. That Signature really upset you didn't it? Good.
You do know that having it in your sig won't magically make it true, right? You're now using your daughter in our little fight. Cunt.
-
It's fairly obvious that very little is actually going on in your head, but do carry on. Cunt.
Bit of Projection there. "I know what you are but what am I?" Fine bit of argument tactic up to the age of 11. Most of us outgrow it. That Signature really upset you didn't it? Good.
You do know that having it in your sig won't magically make it true, right? You're now using your daughter in our little fight. Cunt.
Don't like the torchlight in your direction, you little cockroach? Still projecting your shortcomings? Plan A is not working for you. When are you going to race to your mod tools to try to win your fight? Slimy Odeon.
-
Using your daughter as a tool in this is a new low for you. Spineless little cunt.
-
Using your daughter as a tool in this is a new low for you. Spineless little cunt.
Not using her at all. You are projecting again. I am shining a light on your actions. You do NOT get to bring my family into a discussion to try to point score and then pretend that me seizing on that and telling you to go fuck yourself and why, is now ME using my family to point score. THAT is hypocrisy and projection.
That is all you have Odeon, you weak, spineless, catty little slimeball.
-
Using your daughter as a tool in this is a new low for you. Spineless little cunt.
Not using her at all. You are projecting again. I am shining a light on your actions. You do NOT get to bring my family into a discussion to try to point score and then pretend that me seizing on that and telling you to go fuck yourself and why, is now ME using my family to point score. THAT is hypocrisy and projection.
That is all you have Odeon, you weak, spineless, catty little slimeball.
That's just so much bullshit and intellectual dishonesty. If it had been anyone else I would have been surprised but it's you and, well, it's what you do these days. WTF happened to you? Spineless little dishonest cunt.
-
Using your daughter as a tool in this is a new low for you. Spineless little cunt.
Not using her at all. You are projecting again. I am shining a light on your actions. You do NOT get to bring my family into a discussion to try to point score and then pretend that me seizing on that and telling you to go fuck yourself and why, is now ME using my family to point score. THAT is hypocrisy and projection.
That is all you have Odeon, you weak, spineless, catty little slimeball.
That's just so much bullshit and intellectual dishonesty. If it had been anyone else I would have been surprised but it's you and, well, it's what you do these days. WTF happened to you? Spineless little dishonest cunt.
Yes there are so few people these days that are prepared to shine a light on your blatant projection and hypocrisies. I don't mind though Odeon. I do not mind exposing your being a slimebag. Feign confusion, surprise disappointment in me but I have you dead to rights, and have for a while. I was even prepared to brush off little snipes and the like.
Where you are, is a natural consequence of your own choices. Do not think that projecting your shortcomings or calling labels that best suit your behaviours makes you anything mor than a hypocrite. If you think you will deflect your shortcomings to me, your do not have any thought to the intellect of anyone here. That speaks volumes about you.
You are like a failed magician trying to distract with one hand that you obviously have something another and trying to convince us how there is nothing in either hand by showing us your empty hand. You do this poorly. We are not that stupid.
-
Hey guys, could you take your argument to call-outs please, before it spreads to the whole board. This is really not amusing. :(
-
Too late for that, it seems. Al's not good at containing himself.
-
Hey guys, could you take your argument to call-outs please, before it spreads to the whole board. This is really not amusing. :(
Al, by default, spreads his drama queen vendettas to the entire board by including it in his sig. if it bothers you, maybe that's a good place to start.
-
Too late for that, it seems. Al's not good at containing himself.
Yes let's speak of containment. How many people were obligated to the concept of a truce? Was the truce a want to contain the personal attacks in the past only and for each of us to resolve to keep the truce by containing ourselves and not getting personal. I did. I have said often that you lack the self-control and struggle with the ability to introspect. YOU cannot contain yourself.
Me? I really don't care to be contained and will never take the position of being contained and unable to fight personalised attacks. YOU know this and you CHOSE to get personal and thus broke the truce and the agreement that WAS good for the forum, is cast aside because you lack the ability to contain yourself or take responsibility for your own bad behaviour.
Hey guys, could you take your argument to call-outs please, before it spreads to the whole board. This is really not amusing. :(
Sorry Ren Odeon deliberately crossed the line and broke the truce. He did not HAVE to be he did so anyway and there is fallout and consequences of such actions. He really ought not made that choice. How many callouts have I had with Odeon. How many of those callouts were effective in resolving things? No callout, Ren.
Al, by default, spreads his drama queen vendettas to the entire board by including it in his sig. if it bothers you, maybe that's a good place to start.
Drama Queen vendettas? Don't pretend to think you know what the Hell you are on about. You don't.
-
Where's the popcorn?
Just face the fact that you are defending yourself from your own brainlessness. Keep raging, daddy.
-
Where's the popcorn?
Just face the fact that you are defending yourself from your own brainlessness. Keep raging, daddy.
153 more posts asshat
-
Batty boy had a kid, now he mad at himself for being one. Carry on fighting against yourself and be your own victim. Loser
-
I have signatures blocked.
I didn't mean to actually make a callout, just to take your argument there as a matter of confining it to one place.
-
I have signatures blocked.
I didn't mean to actually make a callout, just to take your argument there as a matter of confining it to one place.
I don't have signatures blocked. I prefer to know exactly what is going on.
Like I said, including one's drama queen vendettas in your sig is not conducive to keeping arguments confined.
-
To be fair, even though they weren't arguing for a while, I think Odeon and Al have both been taunting each other with their signatures since their last argument. I only made a thread about Al's signature because his was very direct. Odeon's is indirect, or maybe passive aggressive, or whatever you want to call it, because it's something someone else said to Al. Saying something about Odeon's signature would have meant claiming to know what he means by it, but yeah, I think it's a jab at Al for months. :dunno:
-
(https://www.health.harvard.edu/media/content/images/products/cover/Bladder_BBBC1017_Cover.jpg)
This might help Al from leaking all over the place. :zoinks:
-
This time last year you acknowledged it was out of line to bring Al's mother into an argument, so what's the problem now? :dunno:
-
His mother you say? What happened?
Did batty boy get battered?
-
My momma's so old she shits fossils. :zoinks:
-
(https://www.health.harvard.edu/media/content/images/products/cover/Bladder_BBBC1017_Cover.jpg)
This might help Al from leaking all over the place. :zoinks:
Zoiks indeed Odeon.
You are running through your narratives aren't you?
1) "I simply acknowledged you have a daughter".
2) "You bringing up your daughter in arguing that I ought not have bought her up makes YOU the scumbag for defending her from me"
3) "You posting all over the board is a problem. YOU should be in a designated area where it can be not addressed. That makes you a problem leaker (just like an old person with leaky bowels. Get it?)"
Stick with this if you like Odeon or cycle through some new ones. Doesn't matter a damn to me. You stepped in this. It did not come out of a vacuum. It was a deliberate choice and it was a very bad one. Why not be a man and accept both the reason and the pettiness behind that bad decision. Instead of trying to bullshit to the forum and project it all on me.
To be very clear, I know you have called me a cunt over and over and the truth is I am and I will not just drop this and you bought this on yourself. It was unnecessary and it was for unnecessary reasons.
You in your righteously indignant fervor do not see anything outside your moral preaching. If I say something like A. "radicalised Muslim Extremists are a problem in the world", all you see is B. "Muslims are all terrible" and you then make it your place to battle the racist, islamaphobic bigot who would be outrageous enough to suggest that C. every Muslim in the world needs to be executed and to such people, any amount of nastiness is justified. (Yes I know that this makes no logical sense and that A is NOT saying B and does not say C - but that is your all over Odeon)
Same in this instance:
I dismiss a ridiculous suggestion that there is a question about whether A. Scrap likes developed Boobs. The fact that Scrap is the primary poster of nude and topless women photos on I2 and MOST of them are VERY Developed is pretty transparent and makes your question at best disingenuous and at worst fucking ridiculous
But all you see is B. I am DEFENDING Scrap and okaying every position Scrap has and everything he has said about females on I2. How Dare I because Scrap said things which could be seen as a genuine attraction to female children and so therefore DESPITE having said to the contrary C. I must secretly support Scrap's interest in female children and defend that and to such people who are pedophile enablers, a personal attack bringing my daughter into things is totally cool.
All righteous indignation and then I pulled you up on it and exposed you and what did you do? Fucking pathetic Odeon.
-
Odeon said the word "daughter" *insert piano music of dread* while wondering if Al had considered other perspectives in a certain reply.
This shit is really getting old.
(https://i.imgur.com/vinBRvQ.jpg)
*You might want to follow up with a long winded sermon on "how dare I" and some stupid redneck meme now Al.
-
Odeon said the word "daughter" *insert piano music of dread* while wondering if Al had considered other perspectives in a certain reply.
This shit is really getting old.
(https://i.imgur.com/vinBRvQ.jpg)
*You might want to follow up with a long winded sermon on "how dare I" and some stupid redneck meme now Al.
Please, you are so far up Odeon's arse you can see his tonsils. You honestly think I look to you as a non-biased source?
-
Please, you are so far up Odeon's arse you can see his tonsils. You honestly think I look to you as a non-biased source?
As usual, you know nothing. :laugh:
-
Please, you are so far up Odeon's arse you can see his tonsils. You honestly think I look to you as a non-biased source?
As usual, you know nothing. :laugh:
Gee, that is a great comeback. You know it is true. Even at times where there is wrong on both sides and admitted wrong doing by both after the fact and when there are many nuances to a conversation claiming valid positions from both sides, YOU see nothing wrong in Odeon and nothing right in what I say. The partisanship and bias is palpable.
Wiggle a bit and give Odeon a cheap thrill.
-
You momma got fucked, you got fucked and your daughter will get fucked. Just face it, you're all fucked.
-
Please, you are so far up Odeon's arse you can see his tonsils. You honestly think I look to you as a non-biased source?
As usual, you know nothing. :laugh:
Gee, that is a great comeback. You know it is true. Even at times where there is wrong on both sides and admitted wrong doing by both after the fact and when there are many nuances to a conversation claiming valid positions from both sides, YOU see nothing wrong in Odeon and nothing right in what I say. The partisanship and bias is palpable.
Wiggle a bit and give Odeon a cheap thrill.
I can't even make sense out of what you're going on about 90% of the time anymore, let alone see a valid point being made.
You made a post awhile back in reply to no one in particular that to me spoke volumes about you.
I don't swim in polluted rivers because they're bad for my health, that's also why I don't waste time engaging in conversation with people I feel are toxic...and I think you're about as toxic some days as they come.
Maybe if you channeled all that anger into something productive you'd have the world by the ass...but as it is, I think it has you by the ass.
-
Please, you are so far up Odeon's arse you can see his tonsils. You honestly think I look to you as a non-biased source?
As usual, you know nothing. :laugh:
Gee, that is a great comeback. You know it is true. Even at times where there is wrong on both sides and admitted wrong doing by both after the fact and when there are many nuances to a conversation claiming valid positions from both sides, YOU see nothing wrong in Odeon and nothing right in what I say. The partisanship and bias is palpable.
Wiggle a bit and give Odeon a cheap thrill.
I can't even make sense out of what you're going on about 90% of the time anymore, let alone see a valid point being made.
You made a post awhile back in reply to no one in particular that to me spoke volumes about you.
I don't swim in polluted rivers because they're bad for my health, that's also why I don't waste time engaging in conversation with people I feel are toxic...and I think you're about as toxic some days as they come.
Maybe if you channeled all that anger into something productive you'd have the world by the ass...but as it is, I think it has you by the ass.
Yes you have tried that tactic before when called on your partisanship and bias, you fall back to "I don't understand you".
Yes you do. You just do not like me and you like Odeon. It is pretty easy to see, You want to stick up and suck up to Odeon and that is fine with me but drop the pretence that you are doing otherwise and for reasons other than this.
-
No I don't like you Al.
I used to...before you polluted this forum with your endless rants and hatred.
But I'm sure you don't like me either...so we're even.
Now I'm done for the moment...shit to do, money to make.
-
This time last year you acknowledged it was out of line to bring Al's mother into an argument, so what's the problem now? :dunno:
It still is. It's Al who is leaking.
-
This time last year you acknowledged it was out of line to bring Al's mother into an argument, so what's the problem now? :dunno:
It still is. It's Al who is leaking.
Then don't bring up people's family members in the same sentence used to insult them. :dunno:
-
Because if you go back far enough in time, you'll find a common ancestor. Mr blobby
-
We have an ancestor in common mdagli, YO MAMMA BEOTCH!!
-
You jelly?
-
This time last year you acknowledged it was out of line to bring Al's mother into an argument, so what's the problem now? :dunno:
It still is. It's Al who is leaking.
Then don't bring up people's family members in the same sentence used to insult them. :dunno:
???
See IQ's post about what I did.
-
I don't need Icequeen to tell me what you did. I saw what you did. :dunno: If I were Al I'd be pissed too. It was uncalled for.
-
If you try hard enough you can eventually find something to be butthurt about. If it wasn't the use of the word "daughter" it would eventually have been something else. If it wasn't Odeon it would be someone else. Some people live for being the centre of the biggest drama they can manufacture.
One has to wonder at the eagerness to defend and obfuscate when a member expresses a preference for young, post-pubescent ladies though. Not implying anything, of course.
-
It's not uncommon for members to have something to say when families are dragged into arguments. This time I'm saying it. This isn't about Al, it's about odeon. Odeon has made it clear numerous times, members aren't allowed to drag his family into arguments. While it makes sense he may not take administrative actions when other people are doing it to each other, I think he should give his membership the same respect he demands for himself. There I said it. :orly:
-
No I don't like you Al.
I used to...before you polluted this forum with your endless rants and hatred.
But I'm sure you don't like me either...so we're even.
Now I'm done for the moment...shit to do, money to make.
Correct. Selective outrage and bias with a touch of moral indignation. But at least a little bit of truth after being called on it. Were you your hero, Odeon, you would have denied, projected, misdirected and resorted to memes. You are shallow and vacuous but there is at least some truth and integrity there.
I will let you get back to your banjo and pipe
-
(https://i.imgur.com/6dxhcnI.jpg)
-
This time last year you acknowledged it was out of line to bring Al's mother into an argument, so what's the problem now? :dunno:
It still is. It's Al who is leaking.
Then don't bring up people's family members in the same sentence used to insult them. :dunno:
???
See IQ's post about what I did.
You will get no more sycophantic supporter than IQ. Her want to provide cover is not an out for you.
Be as slimy and disingenuous as you like. Meme and misdirect all you like, but you are not fooling anyone. Not even IQ, who was charitable enough to leave a fabricated watered down excuse that you now desperately seize upon.
Misrepresentation, Projection, lies, hypocrisy, misdirection, snark, Faux Moral Indignation ..... What the fuck is wrong with you? The con is over. You've been caught, no amount of covering this up will work. Why continue to play act you fucking idiot?
-
I don't need Icequeen to tell me what you did. I saw what you did. :dunno: If I were Al I'd be pissed too. It was uncalled for.
To point out that he has a daughter, too, and so should consider a different viewpoint? He was and is determined to defend and explain away what Scrap has been saying, no matter what, and frankly, I do find it baffling.
-
I don't need Icequeen to tell me what you did. I saw what you did. :dunno: If I were Al I'd be pissed too. It was uncalled for.
To point out that he has a daughter, too, and so should consider a different viewpoint? He was and is determined to defend and explain away what Scrap has been saying, no matter what, and frankly, I do find it baffling.
Different view about what? No one has defended what scrap said. He was reacting to what you said about Scraps taste in breasts. Al wasn't the only one to speak up for Scrap against the insinuation of what you said. There was no need to mention Al's daughter, much less in the same sentence calling him a coward. Though I'm sure justifying it to me is much easier than saying, you're right Al, I should have left your daughter out of it. :dunno:
-
I don't need Icequeen to tell me what you did. I saw what you did. :dunno: If I were Al I'd be pissed too. It was uncalled for.
To point out that he has a daughter, too, and so should consider a different viewpoint? He was and is determined to defend and explain away what Scrap has been saying, no matter what, and frankly, I do find it baffling.
Different view about what? No one has defended what scrap said. He was reacting to what you said about Scraps taste in breasts. Al wasn't the only one to speak up for Scrap against the insinuation of what you said. There was no need to mention Al's daughter, much less in the same sentence calling him a coward. Though I'm sure justifying it to me is much easier than saying, you're right Al, I should have left your daughter out of it. :dunno:
I think the whole developed or undeveloped boob thing shouldn't have been said anyway. I'm now cringing for the men who prefer tiny titty women, and the women who walk around with tiny titties. It doesn't have anything to do with the age of consent. :orly:
-
I don't need Icequeen to tell me what you did. I saw what you did. :dunno: If I were Al I'd be pissed too. It was uncalled for.
To point out that he has a daughter, too, and so should consider a different viewpoint? He was and is determined to defend and explain away what Scrap has been saying, no matter what, and frankly, I do find it baffling.
Different view about what? No one has defended what scrap said. He was reacting to what you said about Scraps taste in breasts. Al wasn't the only one to speak up for Scrap against the insinuation of what you said. There was no need to mention Al's daughter, much less in the same sentence calling him a coward. Though I'm sure justifying it to me is much easier than saying, you're right Al, I should have left your daughter out of it. :dunno:
I did not particularly want to quote GG but they are dead right. Just simply dead on. I have written this too and WHY you did.
You are running through your narratives aren't you?
1) "I simply acknowledged you have a daughter".
2) "You bringing up your daughter in arguing that I ought not have bought her up makes YOU the scumbag for defending her from me"
3) "You posting all over the board is a problem. YOU should be in a designated area where it can be not addressed. That makes you a problem leaker (just like an old person with leaky bowels. Get it?)"
Stick with this if you like Odeon or cycle through some new ones. Doesn't matter a damn to me. You stepped in this. It did not come out of a vacuum. It was a deliberate choice and it was a very bad one. Why not be a man and accept both the reason and the pettiness behind that bad decision. Instead of trying to bullshit to the forum and project it all on me.
To be very clear, I know you have called me a cunt over and over and the truth is I am and I will not just drop this and you bought this on yourself. It was unnecessary and it was for unnecessary reasons.
You in your righteously indignant fervor do not see anything outside your moral preaching. If I say something like A. "radicalised Muslim Extremists are a problem in the world", all you see is B. "Muslims are all terrible" and you then make it your place to battle the racist, islamaphobic bigot who would be outrageous enough to suggest that C. every Muslim in the world needs to be executed and to such people, any amount of nastiness is justified. (Yes I know that this makes no logical sense and that A is NOT saying B and does not say C - but that is your all over Odeon)
Same in this instance:
I dismiss a ridiculous suggestion that there is a question about whether A. Scrap likes developed Boobs. The fact that Scrap is the primary poster of nude and topless women photos on I2 and MOST of them are VERY Developed is pretty transparent and makes your question at best disingenuous and at worst fucking ridiculous
But all you see is B. I am DEFENDING Scrap and okaying every position Scrap has and everything he has said about females on I2. How Dare I because Scrap said things which could be seen as a genuine attraction to female children and so therefore DESPITE having said to the contrary C. I must secretly support Scrap's interest in female children and defend that and to such people who are pedophile enablers, a personal attack bringing my daughter into things is totally cool.
All righteous indignation and then I pulled you up on it and exposed you and what did you do? Fucking pathetic Odeon.
So that is what you do and why
This is what I did and did not support.
Think those might be too developed for him.
But I'm sure he'll clarify any day now.
Who has posted the most nude or semi-nude pictures of women on here and.have the majority of the breasts of these women been developed?
What are the answers and do they support your assertion above?
I'm simply asking questions based on what he's posted before. If you feel the need to clarify his preferences for him, then by all means go ahead.
Sure. We have seen pictorial examples of the women Scrap seems to like. I mean you have seen as many of these nude or topless girls that he has posted as I have over the last 10 or 11 years. It does not seem a big secret to me and ought not be to you that he likes these big boobed women. I mean 90% of them are. There are plenty here and plenty more have been removed over time to make space. Boobs are not a big thing for me personally. Don't get me wrong. I like females and like boobs but big small or medium, is all good for me. He seems to post almost only big boobed girls. Definite type too.
Nope. You are either being deliberately obtuse or being intellectually dishonest.
You asked Scrap repeatedly to clarify his earlier comments. That is fine - although truth be told is is becoming a bit stale.
To then pretend there is any real mystery about whether Scrap likes big boobed women would be as dishonest as pretending seriously that he did not like women at all or that he was gay. As a joke or for shits and giggles fine. But this is actually a little dishonest at the moment.
Here is the core of where you are credible
"Scrap you seem to have made comments where you implied you are sexually interested in pubescent or pre-pubescent girls. Its pretty fucking gross and I want you to clarify."
Despite the fact that you have seemed to have already asked a couple of hundred times and he seems not willing to answer, I would say fair call. Though he has said he was usually drunk at the time and I more than suspect he was making very off-colour jokes or trying to be edgy. It WAS gross. But then off-colour jokes or edgy behaviour is not unknown for him nor unknown on I2 generally.
Still the above from you is far from unreasonable.
If you stray from here and go into boob size. You pass into an area which is pretty defensible by Scrap and patently absurd from you. You can turn around and pretend that it was "You know perfectly well it wasn't about the boob size" but again it LITERALLY was and parsing the words comes up with no other genuine interpretation.
It would be EXACTLY The same if you said "Scrap do you like little boys too?". That too would be you making claims about his possibly being gay (having a sexual preference for males) and that would be dishonest too. Because it is obvious that he is not.
So let's not pretend for a single fucking moment that using my daughter to attack me was justified because I pulled you up on something blatantly ridiculous.
I DO get that you have not the fucking brains in your head to discern the difference between me disagreeing with one point you make about Scrap and disagreeing with everything you will or could say. I know that in your mind I HAVE to disagree and cast him down because he said something that you think was pedophilic and therefore he is condoning pedophilia and therefore he is completely immoral and therefore he is a monster and therefore nothing is off-limits and therefore anything said against him that is attacked or anything that supports him in any way is equally as immoral and could only come from from a monster and so any attack is okay to pushback against supporting and enabling pedophiles and pedophilic cultures and ....
..."oh fuck, he did not actually say anything to support what Scrap said about young girls, and shit, he even denounced Scrap for that, and I have bought in his daughter to attack him.
Well, it doesn't matter because I feel righteous and so I must BE righteous. It was all in the higher purpose of fighting against pedophilia and such and therefore to Hell with apologising for my virtuous feelings".
You did exactly the same when you ran in frothing at the mouth when I said things about "radical Muslim Extremists" (saying not a thing about Muslims in general or the like) in fighting for all Muslims and calling out bigotry.
You are fucking ridiculous and I know what you are doing and why and misdirection, projection, lying, and misrepresenting is fucking stupid. You are not right, nor moral. I think deep down you know how flawed you are and have a compulsion to signal a faux-morality. You hate it exposed.
-
I don't need Icequeen to tell me what you did. I saw what you did. :dunno: If I were Al I'd be pissed too. It was uncalled for.
To point out that he has a daughter, too, and so should consider a different viewpoint? He was and is determined to defend and explain away what Scrap has been saying, no matter what, and frankly, I do find it baffling.
Different view about what? No one has defended what scrap said. He was reacting to what you said about Scraps taste in breasts. Al wasn't the only one to speak up for Scrap against the insinuation of what you said. There was no need to mention Al's daughter, much less in the same sentence calling him a coward. Though I'm sure justifying it to me is much easier than saying, you're right Al, I should have left your daughter out of it. :dunno:
Al's defended Scrap more than once, so what you're saying is simply untrue. My point was then, and is now, that he, as someone with a daughter, should have an additional perspective to consider. We'll have to agree to disagree here. My beef is not with you but with Al.
Oh, and I don't know if it's easier or not. I don't think Al is right, so please don't try to second-guess me and imply that I'm posting this as some kind of face-saving move.
-
I don't need Icequeen to tell me what you did. I saw what you did. :dunno: If I were Al I'd be pissed too. It was uncalled for.
To point out that he has a daughter, too, and so should consider a different viewpoint? He was and is determined to defend and explain away what Scrap has been saying, no matter what, and frankly, I do find it baffling.
Different view about what? No one has defended what scrap said. He was reacting to what you said about Scraps taste in breasts. Al wasn't the only one to speak up for Scrap against the insinuation of what you said. There was no need to mention Al's daughter, much less in the same sentence calling him a coward. Though I'm sure justifying it to me is much easier than saying, you're right Al, I should have left your daughter out of it. :dunno:
Al's defended Scrap more than once, so what you're saying is simply untrue. My point was then, and is now, that he, as someone with a daughter, should have an additional perspective to consider. We'll have to agree to disagree here. My beef is not with you but with Al.
Oh, and I don't know if it's easier or not. I don't think Al is right, so please don't try to second-guess me and imply that I'm posting this as some kind of face-saving move.
BULLSHIT!
I have agreed with Scrap over many things. I even agree with you occasionally. But over his comments on female girls I did not offer a defence and do not think I need to. I HAVE said it was gross and I have said your defence over that was reasonable.
So no. His clear preference for very developed boobs (I challenge you openly to find a more prolific poster of very developed boobs on I2) is not up for question AT ALL. There is nothing defensible from your end. You introduced my daughter to combat my defence of a point that Scrap WAS in fact the person with the most clear indication of a preference for big breasted women.
You bought my daughter into to combat this narrative WHY????
You do not have an answer. Because there is no other perspective I need to consider. Facts are facts. Who here has posted the most photos of nude or topless women? Who has posted the most photos of big breasted women? What percentage of women he has posted have had large breasts? Have there been people who HAVE had a preference for posting women with small breasts? Is he one of these people?
There is NOT another perspective to be gained by thinking about my daughter or drawing on her opinion or any other fucking thing you dickhead.
-
There was no "fabrication", and I do not make up excuses for people. When I read the thread that is how I comprehended it, the gopher obviously saw it in a different perspective.
But then the gopher doesn't view you as a whiny man child either, so there may be some bias.
The thread is still there for all to read and interpret for themselves if they so desire.
...and you can just fuck right off with this shit.
Wiggle a bit and give Odeon a cheap thrill.
Anyone that knows me, knows better.
Or is that just your way of trying to invalidate what I had to say?
Maybe I should ponder why I think you have your nose so far up Scrap's ass lately?
Give him a wiggle Al.
But that's total bullshit and not at all fair to Scrap.
You two obviously share similar viewpoints or just a common enemy, which is fine. I probably don't agree, which is fine too. Deal with it.
-
Common enemy, most likely.
-
But then the gopher doesn't view you as a whiny man child either, so there may be some bias.
To be fair I don't understand, and get frustrated by people who seem to have trouble letting things go. I also don't understand why things get so nasty. Al certainly isn't the only one, but heym they are who they are, and I'm just different, so whatever. It's not like I can say people feel wrong. I'm totally cool with odeon penalizing people for dragging his family into fights, but I think that means he should set the example and completely avoid dragging people's family into fights. I may stand corrected, but I don't believe Al has ever done that to Odeon. :dunno:
-
Funny how Al makes such a drama out of Odeon mentioning his daughter during a debate. In a non-insulting way, to ask Al to consider something from the perspective of a father. And in response he accuses Odeon of fucking his mother in his sig. No hypocrisy or stupidity in that whatsoever, of course, it's what any reasonable man would do. (Hint because obviously not everyone here is a rocket surgeon: the last sentence was sarcasm).
-
Funny how Al makes such a drama out of Odeon mentioning his daughter during a debate. In a non-insulting way, to ask Al to consider something from the perspective of a father.
I feel like I read a different conversation. http://www.intensitysquared.com/index.php/topic,13792.195.html :dunno:
-
And in response he accuses Odeon of fucking his mother in his sig. No hypocrisy or stupidity in that whatsoever, of course, it's what any reasonable man would do. (Hint because obviously not everyone here is a rocket surgeon: the last sentence was sarcasm).
That was a good one. :plus:
-
I'm totally cool with odeon penalizing people for dragging his family into fights, but I think that means he should set the example and completely avoid dragging people's family into fights. I may stand corrected, but I don't believe Al has ever done that to Odeon. :dunno:
Apart from right now. In his fucking sig. All over the fucking forum.
-
I just plussed you for that. Sorry I can't really plus you. An just so everyone knows, I think everyone's momma is fair game. :zoinks:
-
Tweedledee and Tweedledum - Moral relativism grand champions
Tweedledum wants to pretend that "mother fucker" as an insult is ACTUALLY a specific reference to Odeon's mother AND not an insult in the way that calling him an arsehole or a dickhead is an actual insult. He is trying to pretend that this is some directed insult at Odeon's Mum. Therefore what I did is on par with Odeon. Good one dickhead. Put the dunce cap back on and face the wall.
Funny how Al makes such a drama out of Odeon mentioning his daughter during a debate. In a non-insulting way, to ask Al to consider something from the perspective of a father. And in response he accuses Odeon of fucking his mother in his sig. No hypocrisy or stupidity in that whatsoever, of course, it's what any reasonable man would do. (Hint because obviously not everyone here is a rocket surgeon: the last sentence was sarcasm).
There was no "fabrication", and I do not make up excuses for people. When I read the thread that is how I comprehended it, the gopher obviously saw it in a different perspective.
But then the gopher doesn't view you as a whiny man child either, so there may be some bias.
The thread is still there for all to read and interpret for themselves if they so desire.
...and you can just fuck right off with this shit.
Wiggle a bit and give Odeon a cheap thrill.
Anyone that knows me, knows better.
Or is that just your way of trying to invalidate what I had to say?
Maybe I should ponder why I think you have your nose so far up Scrap's ass lately?
Give him a wiggle Al.
But that's total bullshit and not at all fair to Scrap.
You two obviously share similar viewpoints or just a common enemy, which is fine. I probably don't agree, which is fine too. Deal with it.
A little bit more sophisticated than her goofy friend's attempt but equally as stupid, Tweedle Dee. In metaphorical terms - Odeon pisses on me and IceQueen excuses him but saying "Isolated showers, you whiner. It's raining" Now with Odeon caught in the act thinks on his feet and grabs the fabricated excuse and states "Yes it was raining and how could you think I am pissing on you. I am a Rain God, you are being illogical"
Fabricated excuse is fabricated excuse.
But yes let's look at your claim that your partisanship and bias to Odeon is the same as mine to Scrap. To do this let's both show a time in recent past where we have publicly disagreed with the person we and another where we have questioned their integrity. Now let's show any time in the past we have done this. I can do this with Scrap quite easily. Let's see you do this with Odeon.
WHAT??? You can't? Aren't our biases the same. Aren't they alike? Was that attempt at moral relativism dishonest, slimy and fucking stupid? Tweedle Dee I am surprised!
But then the gopher doesn't view you as a whiny man child either, so there may be some bias.
To be fair I don't understand, and get frustrated by people who seem to have trouble letting things go. I also don't understand why things get so nasty. Al certainly isn't the only one, but heym they are who they are, and I'm just different, so whatever. It's not like I can say people feel wrong. I'm totally cool with odeon penalizing people for dragging his family into fights, but I think that means he should set the example and completely avoid dragging people's family into fights. I may stand corrected, but I don't believe Al has ever done that to Odeon. :dunno:
Nope I have not BUT I can show you where he has railed against others bringing my family into arguments. I believe it was my first callout with him. He had a go at Jesse/Richard. He is that guy now.
-
Not on a par at all.
Asking someone to consider a debated subject from the perspective of a father is not the same as, quite literally, saying that they fuck their mother.
Are you stupid as well as being absurdly long-winded? (Don't answer, that was a rhetorical question).
If some low-life prick levelled that sort of accusation at me I would go ballistic.
-
Not on a par at all.
Asking someone to consider a debated subject from the perspective of a father is not the same as, quite literally, saying that they fuck their mother.
Are you stupid as well as being absurdly long-winded? (Don't answer, that was a rhetorical question).
If some low-life prick levelled that sort of accusation at me I would go ballistic.
Feel free you, low life prick
-
Ooh, the old "I know you are but what am I" retort. Better than a 10,000 word essay nobody will ever read, I guess.
-
A little bit more sophisticated than her goofy friend's attempt but equally as stupid, Tweedle Dee. In metaphorical terms - Odeon pisses on me and IceQueen excuses him but saying "Isolated showers, you whiner. It's raining" Now with Odeon caught in the act thinks on his feet and grabs the fabricated excuse and states "Yes it was raining and how could you think I am pissing on you. I am a Rain God, you are being illogical"
Fabricated excuse is fabricated excuse.
But yes let's look at your claim that your partisanship and bias to Odeon is the same as mine to Scrap. To do this let's both show a time in recent past where we have publicly disagreed with the person we and another where we have questioned their integrity. Now let's show any time in the past we have done this. I can do this with Scrap quite easily. Let's see you do this with Odeon.
WHAT??? You can't? Aren't our biases the same. Aren't they alike? Was that attempt at moral relativism dishonest, slimy and fucking stupid? Tweedle Dee I am surprised!
But then the gopher doesn't view you as a whiny man child either, so there may be some bias.
To be fair I don't understand, and get frustrated by people who seem to have trouble letting things go. I also don't understand why things get so nasty. Al certainly isn't the only one, but heym they are who they are, and I'm just different, so whatever. It's not like I can say people feel wrong. I'm totally cool with odeon penalizing people for dragging his family into fights, but I think that means he should set the example and completely avoid dragging people's family into fights. I may stand corrected, but I don't believe Al has ever done that to Odeon. :dunno:
Nope I have not BUT I can show you where he has railed against others bringing my family into arguments. I believe it was my first callout with him. He had a go at Jesse/Richard. He is that guy now.
What the fuck are you on? I need a god damn interpreter to comprehend your bullshit.
-
A little bit more sophisticated than her goofy friend's attempt but equally as stupid, Tweedle Dee. In metaphorical terms - Odeon pisses on me and IceQueen excuses him but saying "Isolated showers, you whiner. It's raining" Now with Odeon caught in the act thinks on his feet and grabs the fabricated excuse and states "Yes it was raining and how could you think I am pissing on you. I am a Rain God, you are being illogical"
Fabricated excuse is fabricated excuse.
But yes let's look at your claim that your partisanship and bias to Odeon is the same as mine to Scrap. To do this let's both show a time in recent past where we have publicly disagreed with the person we and another where we have questioned their integrity. Now let's show any time in the past we have done this. I can do this with Scrap quite easily. Let's see you do this with Odeon.
WHAT??? You can't? Aren't our biases the same. Aren't they alike? Was that attempt at moral relativism dishonest, slimy and fucking stupid? Tweedle Dee I am surprised!
But then the gopher doesn't view you as a whiny man child either, so there may be some bias.
To be fair I don't understand, and get frustrated by people who seem to have trouble letting things go. I also don't understand why things get so nasty. Al certainly isn't the only one, but heym they are who they are, and I'm just different, so whatever. It's not like I can say people feel wrong. I'm totally cool with odeon penalizing people for dragging his family into fights, but I think that means he should set the example and completely avoid dragging people's family into fights. I may stand corrected, but I don't believe Al has ever done that to Odeon. :dunno:
Nope I have not BUT I can show you where he has railed against others bringing my family into arguments. I believe it was my first callout with him. He had a go at Jesse/Richard. He is that guy now.
What the fuck are you on? I need a god damn interpreter to comprehend your bullshit.
I think reading comprehension is a beyond you. I would suggest sticking to spitting chewing tobacco and playing the banjo. I have every confidence you will succeed at both
-
(http://incontinence.cochrane.org/sites/incontinence.cochrane.org/files/public/styles/feature/public/uploads/feature_image_field/toilet-paper-170616346_1253x839.jpeg?itok=_0Yeok5y)
-
(http://incontinence.cochrane.org/sites/incontinence.cochrane.org/files/public/styles/feature/public/uploads/feature_image_field/toilet-paper-170616346_1253x839.jpeg?itok=_0Yeok5y)
(https://i.imgflip.com/2dq8o0.jpg)
-
(https://images-na.ssl-images-amazon.com/images/I/81wjRPK0hBL._SL1500_.jpg)
-
(https://i.imgflip.com/2dqb3k.jpg)
Interesting. Narratives thus far and want to obfuscate, misdirect, misrepresent, lie, project and minimise has failed so I think memes is a bad option but amoung the better choices left. I am thinking Admin Panel moderating to point score and control is not far away, huh?
-
(https://i.imgur.com/3fqazTJ.jpg)
-
(https://i.imgur.com/3fqazTJ.jpg)
(https://i.imgflip.com/2dqpbl.jpg)
-
(https://i.imgur.com/94acbWi.jpg)
-
(https://i.imgflip.com/2dy9f2.jpg)
-
(https://i.imgur.com/RZYaOuO.jpg)
-
(https://i.imgur.com/RZYaOuO.jpg)
(https://i.imgflip.com/2dyejt.jpg)