INTENSITY²
Start here => What's your crime? Basic Discussion => Topic started by: bodie on January 02, 2014, 05:44:32 AM
-
Is it more important to punish or rehabilitate those we send to prison?
Look at these statisticshttp://www.prisonreformtrust.org.uk/Portals/0/Documents/Prisonthefacts.pdf (http://www.prisonreformtrust.org.uk/Portals/0/Documents/Prisonthefacts.pdf)
47% of adults are reconvicted within a year of release. This figure rises to nearly 70% of those who had short sentences of less than 12 moths. Nearly three quarters (73%) of under 18 year olds are reconvicted within a year of release.
Depressing figures. I haven't actually worked out yet what should happen to the extremely dangerous, but I am of the opinion that most people in prison shouldn't be there. I have heard people say "prison is like a holiday camp" so I wonder what people think prison should be like. I know they are overcrowded places where people are often locked up 23/24 hrs. They are also full of criminals. So it is easy to see why re-offending rates are so high. It is a form of punishment, but also innocent people like their kids get punished also. They lose a parent for x amount of time. If prison is a punishment ,meant to make people 'learn lessons' then it doesn't work very well. Take a 'thief' as an example, who's family is already in debt, which is likely why they committed the crime anyway, if you put him in prison then his family is just more likely to face hardship and lose their homes. How is this going to benefit society?
Court ordered community sentences are more effective by 8.3% at reducing one-year proven reoffending rates than custodial sentences of less than 12 months for similar offenders.
If this is true, then I think community sentences could be enhanced and we could improve crime rates.
23% of young offenders have learning difficulties (IQs of below 70) and a further 36% have borderline learning difficulties (IQ 70-80).
47% of prisoners say they have no qualifications. This compares to 15% of the working age general population in the UK.
I think crime is not just a matter of 'free will' and circumstances and disadvantages do at least play some part. This is not being addressed and will never be addressed while the majority of people are so hell bent on seeking punishment, or revenge.
Education is a big factor, but not the only one. I do believe that people behave better if they have a better standard of living.
When I think about the fact that my community is likely to have a certain percentage of ex cons I ask myself how do I want them to behave? Do adults, like children, still copy others to determine behaviour? then if this is true it makes no sense to me to lock them away with other criminals in a setting that is nothing like my community.
Looking across Europe the only real model I found that focuses a lot less on punishment and more on rehabilitation was in Norway. http://edition.cnn.com/2012/05/24/world/europe/norway-prison-bastoy-nicest/index.html (http://edition.cnn.com/2012/05/24/world/europe/norway-prison-bastoy-nicest/index.html) Now I am not suggesting this type of prison will work for all crimes, everywhere, but it is at least worth looking at. If you look at the figures of reoffending rates. But then again Norway is supposed to have the highest standard of living in Europe.
-
You make generalizations on why crimes are committed without supporting them with evidence. The document you linked to is a list of studies, most of which have had a single, isolated quote taken for a given section. With no context, it's hard to see what conclusion can be drawn from a list of isolated statistics. For example, take your quote on community sentences. In America (and, I assume, in Great Britain), less severe crimes would merit community sentences, so perhaps the controlling factor is the severity of the original offense. Did the original study control for that? I'd hope so, but it's not apparent, looking at the document.
-
:bigcry:
It took me ages to write that!
I suppose I could find more evidence. But I need to go get my tooth fixed. To thtop me talking with a lithsp.
Anyway, don't you just have an opinion? It is a simple question. Is it more important to punish or rehabilitate people?
-
It depends upon the nature of the crime. Most important IMO is protecting the rest of society from future crimes.
-
The second link was this
Bastoy, Norway (CNN) -- Jan Petter Vala, who is serving a prison sentence for murder, has hands the size of dinner plates and shoulders like those of an ox. In an alcoholic rage, he used his brutish strength to strangle his girlfriend to death a few years ago.
On a recent Thursday, however, at this summer-camp-like island prison in southern Norway, where convicts hold keys to their rooms and there are no armed guards or fences, Vala used those same enormous hands to help bring life into the world.
The 42-year-old murderer stood watch while an oversize cow gave birth to a wobbly, long-legged, brown-and-white calf. He cried as the baby was born, he said, and wiped slime off of the newborn's face so she could gulp her first breath.
Afterward, Vala called his own mother to share the good news.
"I told my family that I'm going to be a dad," he said, beaming with pride.
This is exactly the type of dramatic turnabout -- enraged killer to gentle-giant midwife -- that corrections officials in Norway hope to create with this controversial, one-of-a-kind prison, arguably the cushiest the world has to offer.
Founded in 1982, Bastoy Prison is located on a lush, 1-square-mile island of pine trees and rocky coasts, with views of the ocean that are postcard-worthy. It feels more like a resort than jail, and prisoners here enjoy freedoms that would be unthinkable elsewhere.
It's the holiday version of Alcatraz.
Overheard on CNN.com: What's prison for?
There's a beach where prisoners sunbathe in the summer, plenty of good fishing spots, a sauna and tennis courts. Horses roam gravel roads. Some of the 115 prisoners here -- all men and serving time for murder, rape and trafficking heroin, among other crimes -- stay in wooden cottages, painted cheery red. They come and go as they please. Others live in "The Big House," a white mansion on a hill that, on the inside, looks like a college dorm. A chicken lives in the basement, a guard said, and provides eggs for the inmates.
When you ask the cook what's for dinner, he offers up menu choices like "fish balls with white sauce, with shrimps" and "everything from chicken con carne to salmon."
Plenty of people would pay to vacation in a place like this.
On first read, all of that probably sounds infuriating. Shouldn't these men be punished? Why do they get access to all these comforts while others live in poverty?
But if the goal of prison is to change people, Bastoy seems to work.
"If we have created a holiday camp for criminals here, so what?" asked Arne Kvernvik Nilsen, the prison's governor and a former minister and psychologist. He added, "We should reduce the risk of reoffending, because if we don't, what's the point of punishment, except for leaning toward the primitive side of humanity?"
Take a quick look at the numbers: Only 20% of prisoners who come through Norway's prisons reoffend within two years of being released, according to a 2010 report commissioned by the governments of several Nordic countries.
At Bastoy, that figure is even lower, officials say: about 16%.
Compare that with the three-year re-offense rate for state prisons in the U.S.: 43%, according to a 2011 report from the Pew Center on the States, a nonpartisan research group. Older government reports put that number even higher, at more than five in 10.
Ryan King, a research director at Pew and an author of the group's recent report, said it's difficult to compare recidivism rates from state to state, much less from country to country. Instead of focusing on the numbers, he said, one should focus on what a country is or isn't doing to tackle re-offense rates.
Still, Bastoy remains controversial even in academia. Irvin Waller, president of the International Organization for Victim Assistance and a professor at the University of Ottawa, said in an e-mail that the relative niceness of a prison has no effect on whether people commit crimes when they're released. "The key is not that much what happens in prison but what happens when the men are released," he said.
But officials here maintain that their methods do make a difference, and they follow it up with post-release programs. The aim of Bastoy is not to punish or seek revenge, Nilsen said. The only punishment is to take away the prisoner's right to be a free member of society.
Even at a time when Anders Behring Breivik is on trial in Norway for killing 77 people in a terror attack last year -- and the remote possibility he could end up at Bastoy or a similar prison some day -- Nilsen and others stand up for this brand of justice.
Life at Bastoy
To understand Norway's pleasant-prison philosophy, first you have to get a sense of how life at a cushy, low-security prison like Bastoy actually plays out.
There are few rules here. Prisoners can have TVs in their rooms, provided they bring them from "outside" when they're sentenced. They wear whatever clothes they want: jeans, T-shirts. One man had a sweater with pink-and-gray horizontal stripes, but that's as close as it got to the jailbird look. Even guards aren't dressed in uniform, which makes conducting interviews tricky. It's impossible to tell an officer from a drug trafficker.
A common opening question: "So, do you live here?"
Everyone at Bastoy has a job, and prisoners must report to work from 8:30 a.m. to 3:30 p.m. weekdays. Some people garden; others farm. Some chop down trees and slice them into firewood (It's hard not to think about the wood chipper scene in "Fargo" when you see inmates filleting tree trunks with an enormous circular saw). Others tend to a team of horses, which are used to cart wood and supplies from one part of the island to another. Everyone moves about freely during these tasks. Guards are sometimes present, sometimes not. No one wears shackles or electronic monitoring bracelets.
The idea is for prison to function like a small, self-sustaining village.
For their work, inmates are paid. They get a stipend of 59 Norwegian kroner per day, about $10. They can save that money or spend it on odds and ends in a local shop. Additionally, they get a monthly stipend of about $125 for their food. Kitchen workers -- that's another inmate job -- serve Bastoy residents dinner each day. For breakfast and lunch, inmates use their stipend to make purchases in the local shop and then cook for themselves at home. Many live in small houses that have full kitchens. Others have access to shared cooking space.
The goal, Nilsen said, is to create an environment where people can build self-esteem and reform their lives. "They look at themselves in the mirror, and they think, 'I am s***. I don't care. I am nothing,' " he said. This prison, he says, gives them a chance to see they have worth, "to discover, 'I'm not such a bad guy.' "
In locked-down prisons, inmates are treated "like animals or robots," he said, moving from one planned station to the next, with no choice in the matter. Here, inmates are forced to make choices -- to learn how to be better people.
Prisoners, of course, appreciate this approach.
Kjell Amundsen, a 70-year-old who said he is in jail for a white-collar financial crime, was terrified when he rode the 15-minute ferry from the mainland out to Bastoy.
On a recent afternoon, he was sweeping up in a plant nursery while John Lennon's "Imagine" played on the radio. "I think it's marvelous to be in a prison this way," he said.
He plans to keep up the task after his sentence ends. "I'm living in a flat (when I get out), but I am convinced I should have a little garden," he said.
Some prisoners get schooling in a yellow Bavarian-style building near the center of the island. On a recent afternoon, three young men were learning to use computer programs to create 3-D models of cars. All expressed interest in doing this sort of work after their prison terms end.
Tom Remi Berg, a 22-year-old who said he is in prison for the third time after getting into a bar fight and beating a man nearly to death, said he is finally learning his lesson at Bastoy.
He works in the kitchen and is seeking training to become a chef when he's released. He also plays in the prison blues band -- Guilty as Hell -- and lives with his bandmates.
"It's good to have a prison like this," he said. "You can learn to start a new page again."
If escaped, please call
The prisoners are required to check in several times a day so guards can make sure they're still on the island. Nothing but 1½ miles of seawater stops them from leaving; they'd only have to steal one of the prison's boats to cross it, several inmates said.
An escape would be relatively easy.
Prisoners have tried to escape in the past. One swam halfway across the channel and became stranded on a buoy and screamed for rescuers to help, prison officials said. Another made it across the channel by stealing a boat but was caught on the other side.
Many, however, don't want to leave. If they tried and failed, they would be forced to go to a higher-security prison and could have their sentences extended.
When inmates come to his island jail, Nilsen, the governor, gives them a little talk.
Among the wisdom he imparts is this: If you should escape and make it across the water to the free shore, find a phone and call so I know you're OK and "so we don't have to send the coast guard looking for you."
This kind of trust may seem shocking or naïve from the outside, but it's the entire basis for Bastoy's existence. Overnight, only three or four guards (the prison employs 71 administrative staff, including the guards) stay on the island with this group of people who have been convicted of serious crimes. If guards carried weapons (which they don't) it might encourage inmates to take up arms, too, he said.
Further complicating the security situation, some inmates, toward the end of their terms, are allowed to leave the island on a daily ferry to work or attend classes on the mainland.
They're expected to come back on their own free will.
'It's still prison'
There's a question inmates here get asked frequently: When your sentence is up, will you want to leave?
The answer, despite the nice conditions, is always an emphatic yes.
"It's still prison," said Luke, 23. He didn't want his full name used for fear future employers would see it. "In your mind, you are locked (up)."
The simple fact of being taken away from family members is enough to stop Benny, 40, from wanting to offend again. The refugee from Kosovo said he was convicted on drug charges after he was found with 13 pounds of heroin. He didn't want his full name used because he doesn't want to embarrass his family or jeopardize his chance of finding a job after he's released.
Before coming to Bastoy, he sat in a higher-security prison while one of his children was born.
"It doesn't matter how long the sentences get. The sentence doesn't matter," Benny said. "When you take freedom from people, that's what's scary."
There are only 3,600 people in prison in this country, compared with 2.3 million in the United States, according to the Bureau of Justice Statistics. Relative to population, the U.S. has about 10 times as many inmates as Norway.
More than 89% of Norway's jail sentences are less than a year, officials said. In U.S. federal prisons, longer sentences are much more common, with fewer than 2% serving a year or less, according to the Federal Bureau of Prisons.
Some researchers support Norway's efforts to lighten sentences.
Think of prison like parenting and it starts to make sense, said Mark A.R. Kleiman, a professor of public policy at UCLA and author of "When Brute Force Fails."
"Every parent knows this. What if you tried to discipline your kid by saying, 'If you don't clean your room, there's a 10% chance I'll kick you out of the house and never see you again'?" he said, referencing the fact that many crimes in America go unpunished, but the justice system issues harsh sentences when offenders are caught. Grounding the child immediately, a softer sentence, would work better, even though the punishment is less severe, he said.
"We have a criminal justice system (in the United States) that, if it were a parent, we would say it's abusive and neglectful."
Kleiman said victims do have a right to see offenders punished. But in Norway, a country with one of the highest standards of living in the world, staying on a resort-like island with horses might feel like punishment to many people, he said.
Research also suggests that programs like Bastoy that train inmates for their transition back into the free world -- with education, counseling and such -- do help prisoners adjust.
"There is overwhelming evidence that rehabilitation works much better than deterrence as a means of reducing re-offending," said Gerhard Ploeg, a senior adviser at the Ministry of Justice, which oversees Norway's corrections system.
"It's all in the name of reintegration," he added. "You won't be suddenly one day standing on the street with a plastic bag of things you had when you came in."
Norway's unusual prison policies have been pushed into the international spotlight after a bombing and shooting spree last year in which 77 people were killed, including children.
There's a chance -- although minimal -- that Anders Behring Breivik, who confessed to those crimes, could end up in Bastoy, one of Norway's "open prisons," Nilsen said.
Norwegians value respecting killer's human rights
It's more likely Breivik will be sent to one of Norway's many high-security "closed" prisons, which look much more like their U.S. counterparts.
He also could be set free some day. Norway has a maximum jail sentence of 21 years, which can be extended only when an inmate is deemed to be a real and imminent threat to society. The country expects nearly every prisoner to be returned to society, which influences its efforts to create jail environments that reduce re-offense rates.
Lawyer: Norwegian killer vows not to appeal guilty verdict if found sane
"The question we must ask is, 'What kind of person do I want as my neighbor?' " Ploeg said. "How do we want people to come out of prison? If your neighbor were to come out of prison, what would you want him to be like?"
Still, it's likely Breivik's sentence will be extended to the point that he will spend his life in a high-security prison, he said. Or he could go into life-long psychiatric care.
Breivik's case challenges a system that hopes to fix everyone.
The case has unearthed levels of anger that are uncharacteristic of Norway, which prides itself as a home for conflict mediation and human rights, a place that hosts the Nobel Peace Prize ceremony and has one of the best standards of living in the world.
Last week, a man lit himself on fire outside the Oslo courthouse where Breivik's trial is taking place. His motives were unclear, police said.
"(Breivik) doesn't deserve to go to prison," said Camilla Bjerke, 27, who tends bar in Horten, the town on the other side of the water from Bastoy. "He deserves to be hanged outside the courthouse. ... He's just going to go into prison and watch TV and download movies."
Then there's this sentiment: If Breivik were ever released into the public, someone would kill him, several Norwegians said. Inmates at Bastoy echoed those sentiments, saying he would have to be quarantined or he wouldn't be safe on the island.
Others are trying to fight that anger.
Bjorn Ihler, a 20-year-old who narrowly escaped Breivik's shooting spree by diving into the ocean with two children while bullets flew at them, said, "it's very important that we don't let this terrorist change the way we are and the way things work."
"The prison system in Norway is based around the principle of getting criminals back into society, really, and away from their criminal life -- and to get them normal jobs and stuff like that," he said.
He doesn't know how he would feel if Breivik were to be released, but he would like the system to function as usual. "So prisons must be very much focused on getting people to a place where they are able to live normal, non-criminal lives. And that's the best way of preserving society from crime, I think."
Looking to the future
All of these efforts aim to help a person like Vala, the gentle giant who strangled his girlfriend, to get ready for release back into society at the end of his 10-year sentence.
After he helped a toddling calf come into the world, Vala said, he leaned on a rail next to the cow's pen and thought about his life and the murder that landed him here. The symbolism that he had used his hands to end one life and help begin another was not lost on him. "I stayed for six hours," he said. "It was very beautiful."
The night he killed his girlfriend, Vala says, he blacked out and then came to with his hands around her neck, after she was dead.
"We never fight," he said. "We never do. So I don't know what happened."
He felt helpless and out of control when he came to.
But now he's trying to pull it together. He decided to quit drinking for good. And when he's working with animals, he said, feels a new calm wash over him.
It's a change the prison guards have noted, too. Sigurd Vedvik said he met Vala while he was serving out the earlier part of his sentence in a high-security prison. Vedvik was screening him for entry into Bastoy. Vala barely could communicate. He seemed broken.
"When he first came here, he was very afraid of many people," said Vedvik, who sees himself as more of a teacher or social worker than a person who enforces security.
Now, Vala is making friends. Talking more. Taking responsibility for the cattle he's tasked with caring for. He strokes the cows' necks so gently, it seems as if he's worried they will shatter.
When Vala leaves Bastoy, he plans to go into the construction business and hopes to find some way to spend time on a farm.
"I'm trying to think to my future."
That's something he couldn't do after the murder.
And it took a posh prison -- one with cattle and horses -- to get him into that state of mind.
http://edition.cnn.com/2012/05/24/world/europe/norway-prison-bastoy-nicest/index.html (http://edition.cnn.com/2012/05/24/world/europe/norway-prison-bastoy-nicest/index.html)
-
There should be no prisons. Instead everyone should be able to defend themselves with guns. That means that really dangerous persons would in most cases be eliminated by sane persons.
Prison is the most inhumane thing ever invented.
-
I think it depends a lot on the temperament of the prisoner. True sociopaths can't be rehabilitated, but some other people can. I think there should be a lot of emphasis on work programs and education in prison for those likely to benefit from them.
-
They don't get rehabilitated in prison. Their hatred towards society grows 100 or 1000 times stronger, though.
You don't realize that the whole system is to keep status quo, not to give real justice to anyone. The only rightful system is a system where honest people can avoid to become crime victims in the first place. If you are murdered, it won't do you any good that the murderer gets punished.
Another good investment to prevent crimes is good social security. You can observe this very clearly in the US: they have the most liberal gun law of all states but very few gross crimes. That is because they are also very ethnically and socially homogeneous and have the best social security system in the US.
-
They don't get rehabilitated in prison. Their hatred towards society grows 100 or 1000 times stronger, though.
You don't realize that the whole system is to keep status quo, not to give real justice to anyone. The only rightful system is a system where honest people can avoid to become crime victims in the first place. If you are murdered, it won't do you any good that the murderer gets punished.
Another good investment to prevent crimes is good social security. You can observe this very clearly in the US: they have the most liberal gun law of all states but very few gross crimes. That is because they are also very ethnically and socially homogeneous and have the best social security system in the US.
Who is "they"? The US isn't ethnically or socially homogeneous.
-
Oh! :facepalm: I was about to write: "In Vermont they have the most liberal gun law of all states in the US etc." In Vermont they have a very homogeneous and socially secure society.
-
Oh! :facepalm: I was about to write: "In Vermont they have the most liberal gun law of all states in the US etc." In Vermont they have a very homogeneous and socially secure society.
???
So the US should segregate along ethnic and social lines?
-
No, you don't have to segregate. It was just an example of how a society can avoid crimes pretty easily.
-
Punishment is emotional, rehabilitation is practical, but there are no rules without exceptions.
But, let's not forget that prison is also about separation, for example pedophiles - or pedophile child-killers - or worse, where the issue, while it may be revenge-driven, should mainly be about separation from society.
And in this case begs the question: How much do we charge society yearly, to keep these unredeemable offenders alive and healthy?
That said, the VAST majority of inmates, in the VAST majority of prisons, anywhere, have done crimes of much less importance. Even the majority of murders commited are one-time cases (probably not counting notorious crime-holes, but I believe even there statistics are exaggerated, especially for most western nations). It is unlikely that a murder in affection will repeat itself. Someone who kills someone over debts or jealousy or revenge will typically have quite a limited number of such enemies, usually just one, whom they eventually dealt with. Accidental manslaughter is another example - do we REALLY need to punish/rehabilitate/separate someone who weren't even AWARE they were commiting an offense? Most countries will show leniancy towards such cases, but even then, "symbolic" punishments are given - like.. 1 year in prison, or something. What for!? What will that achieve!?
I can't offer solutions that will please everybody on this matter, but todays prison system is flawed and medieval in nature. To recap - prison should mainly be about separating truly dangerous repeat-offenders from society. Someone who commited a crime in desperation or affection do not count as "truly dangerous" in that sense, imho, and even less do victim-less crimes.
"Hey now - there is NO such thing as a victim-less crime!" of course there is.
"Hey now! Even your pot-smoking causes victims in.. eh... idunno... brown-skinned countries! I suppose." no. They cause paychecks.
-
:agreed:
-
@ Zeg
You are from Norway, yeah? What do people there make of the 'Bastoy' prison in Norway? The re offending rates are very impressive but not sure if people here would be willing to embrace the concept of such a prison. Revenge and retribution seem to dominate when it comes to dealing with crime.
-
@ Zeg
You are from Norway, yeah? What do people there make of the 'Bastoy' prison in Norway? The re offending rates are very impressive but not sure if people here would be willing to embrace the concept of such a prison. Revenge and retribution seem to dominate when it comes to dealing with crime.
Bastøy is a little social experiment, just to have that said :D Michael Moore's docu made the misleading impression that Norwegian prisons are like that as a norm :D They are not! :D
And I find Bastøy, to be honest, a quite ideal setup. The inmates are given an oportunity to actually change their inner workings, to re-calibrate their impulses, if you will. Many of these petty crimes, such as assault or robbery, comes from a personality that is conditioned to behaving that way - and normal prison does little to recondition them. Bastøy, on the other hand, is a good example of a prison that indeed reconditions criminals into adopting a whole new mindset, and a new manner to react to triggers.
Reconditioning is something very unexplored, in many fields of lay-man psychology, and is often myth-ridden, such as the awful advice of telling people to "vent their emotions", since this conditions the brain (rewards the brain) into triggering emotional outbursts when you encounter hardship. People who scream, feel good when they scream, and reward their brain for triggering the need to scream. It is an emotional cycle.
(I'm not talking about "talking about your problems" here, that is healthy confrontation of your inner issues. I'm talking about acting-out on emotions, such as crying, screaming, punching pillows, such stuff)
You cannot "bottle up" your emotions. This is simply human semantics confused with human physiology. It may come as a surprise to many - but humans are not bottles, and emotions are not liquids: We cannot "bottle up". To quite the contrary: By bottling up an emotion, you condition your brain to sit back and relax, and take problems with calm and rationality.
I digressed a little there, but to illustrate what little attention we actually give the psychological possibilities when it comes to rehabilitation and reconditioning of criminal/violent/unstable people.
-
@ Zeg
You are from Norway, yeah? What do people there make of the 'Bastoy' prison in Norway? The re offending rates are very impressive but not sure if people here would be willing to embrace the concept of such a prison. Revenge and retribution seem to dominate when it comes to dealing with crime.
Bastøy is a little social experiment, just to have that said :D Michael Moore's docu made the misleading impression that Norwegian prisons are like that as a norm :D They are not! :D
And I find Bastøy, to be honest, a quite ideal setup. The inmates are given an oportunity to actually change their inner workings, to re-calibrate their impulses, if you will. Many of these petty crimes, such as assault or robbery, comes from a personality that is conditioned to behaving that way - and normal prison does little to recondition them. Bastøy, on the other hand, is a good example of a prison that indeed reconditions criminals into adopting a whole new mindset, and a new manner to react to triggers.
Reconditioning is something very unexplored, in many fields of lay-man psychology, and is often myth-ridden, such as the awful advice of telling people to "vent their emotions", since this conditions the brain (rewards the brain) into triggering emotional outbursts when you encounter hardship. People who scream, feel good when they scream, and reward their brain for triggering the need to scream. It is an emotional cycle.
(I'm not talking about "talking about your problems" here, that is healthy confrontation of your inner issues. I'm talking about acting-out on emotions, such as crying, screaming, punching pillows, such stuff)
You cannot "bottle up" your emotions. This is simply human semantics confused with human physiology. It may come as a surprise to many - but humans are not bottles, and emotions are not liquids: We cannot "bottle up". To quite the contrary: By bottling up an emotion, you condition your brain to sit back and relax, and take problems with calm and rationality.
I digressed a little there, but to illustrate what little attention we actually give the psychological possibilities when it comes to rehabilitation and reconditioning of criminal/violent/unstable people.
I have not seen the Michael Moore documentary. I have only read about Bastøy ( I have to copy and paste 'ø' so you might have to put up with a few Bastoy's :laugh: )
The articles I have read did state that it was the only one of it's kind in Norway (making reference to an inmate who had previously been in real prison) but there was a kind of hint that the people in Norway are inclined to think that way. Like as if Norwegians are blessed with a double forgiveness gene that the rest of the world are without :angel: This has been echoed by the international responses I read "It might work in Norway, but it wouldn't work here" that kind of thing. Which is why I was curious about the public perception in Norway.
Anyway I do think it is a very bold social experiment. I like it. The men that I read about were indeed 'reset'. (Is there a women's version? I haven't read about any) They were not downtrodden, or humiliated or treated as something just less than a human being which goes on in many prisons. The screws don't wear a uniform either. They are treated as human beings, which of course they are. They also have to make choices and decisions. This is a good idea as many ex prisoners become so used to being told when to eat, sleep, shit etc that they simply can't cope when released. These guys are not institutionalised. They leave with a much improved mindset as when they arrived.
-
Likewise, I agree with zegh.
Prison should be about keeping those who are truly dangerous to society, out of it.
Paedophiles...well, thats the perfect example, of some cunt that needs locking up and the keys melting down with a welding torch. Of course some discretion on the part of judges and sentencing if any, is needed, as theres a great difference between someone a few years older and a partner a little under 16, and someone who goes round raping toddlers, dirty old men exposing themselves in kids play areas and the like.
I myself for instance, have been in a relationship like that, when I was 18-19 or so, not going to say publicly just how old the girl was, but got in a relationship with this classic autie girl, who was, well, not old enough. But does that make me a dangerous paedophile needing exterminating or removing from society? I don't think so. Loved her, so much so that we were engaged after a very short time (weeks from first meeting), and were it necessary, I would have dived in front of an oncoming train to push her out of the way, even if that had meant my completely certainly being hit and killed.
Its been years since I had contact with her, and to this day, I still think of this one girl, still miss her like crazy :(
Then you have on the other hand, the kiddie porn makers and distributors, the nepiophiles, child rapists and parents that whore out their children to nonces, or parents that stand by in a relationship, where the other 'person' is a violent chomo.
Also, I think ALL drug 'criminals' 'offenders' must be released and financially compensated for their time inside, as well as offered counselling for the emotional and psychological damage that IMO is inevitable from a prolonged prison sentence.
And prison is NOT a holiday camp. Don't make the mistake of believing in the bollocks that the papers print about how offenders are living the time of their lives inside. They aren't. Maybe in the lowest of low security, open prisons its a lot better. But in even lower security 'proper' prisons, its just not the case. Of the two I have been in, one of them, the non-max sec place, the conditions there could justifiably be described as 'medieval'. They apparently still 'slop out' in some prisons in the UK for example (having to piss and shite in a bucket overnight, and then dump the waste in the morning on unlock for feeding period.
The food...the food is absolutely dismal. Truly, truly horrifying in some cases. One 'meal' I saw served up, and got served (I didn't eat it), was a liquid slop, that appeared to consist of some sort of sauce liquid, and shreds of greyish brown animal flesh. I didn't ask what that was, as I was afraid of the question being answered. Pallid, greyish, septic-looking chicken pieces etc.
One guy's food put him in hospital, didn't ever see the guy return either. Although it should probably be mentioned that it was due to actual poisoning, someone was going to get battered, and the guy was a bully, so that person laced his breakfast jam and marmalade packets with a mixture of toxins isolated from various products available, plus some primitive biological agents. Some people have it coming, and I guess, the person that was on the receiving end of his bullying ways and violence, must have had enough and decided to take him out.
Of course, *I*, sweet, innocent, meek and mild little ol' me, would never do or condone such tactics, but I cannot honestly say I lost any sleep over his probable slow, painful death. Goes to show, never fuck with someone autistic. Brains can often be far nastier than the application of mere physical brawn (odd phrase, I've always thought. 'brains over brawn', as here at least, 'brawn' is a culinary abomination that consists of cooked animal brain). At any rate, guy was a major prick and had it coming:P
(I don't actually believe in even the existence of drug crime, other than crimes of E.g violence associated with the substances being illegal and the necessity thereby, of obtaining them and distributing them through illegal channels, gangs etc., or of course, theft by addicts to obtain sufficient funds to ensure the continued availability of the drug(s) they are dependent upon, but those who simply possess, take, or sell drugs, without violence, they should never have been arrested in the first place. Offered [not forced to undergo] treatment and detox facilities if they wish to make use of them, but otherwise, not interfered with)
Another thing I think should be done, is to make damn sure people with autism, or other special ed categories, should have access to appropriate psychological support whilst inside, ignoring entirely what they are locked up for, a lot of us apparently, when locked up either do not get recognized as spesh, or they are, and are just thrown to the wolves. I myself, am quite capable of handling myself in a hostile situation, and putting someone down for good, if it is essential to do so for my safety. I'm not the biggest person, quite slightly built, although its a wiry, whipcord thin type rather than emaciated, and not the hardest, I'm no thug type either. But I can, and will make certain that anybody who fucks with me, doesn't do so more than once. By any means necessary. Up to, and including the 'B' and 'C' in 'NBC' warfare. If i can't take on a bully or thug with muscle alone, then they find themselves dealing with someone who is a lot smarter, and a great deal more creative than they are.
But there are many auties, aspies, who aren't so able to defend themselves, and who will get torn to pieces in most wings of most prisons. I think for autistic people, they should be offered the (completely voluntary) option of solitary confinement for the duration of their sentence, or to go for periods down the seg block if they need it. And whilst it is usually used for punishment, in the case of it being offered and then requested by the inmate, then it should be available simply as a place to be housed within the prison, without the associated loss of privileges that getting sent to the block otherwise entails, given how it isn't being used as a punishment in this case.
I myself would have taken the option for solitary, when I got banged up for that 8-9 months if I had the choice to do so. I don't need human interaction. Feeding yes, exercise, yes, but to socialize? lol, I have absolutely NO need for it whatsoever. Although it would have made it very difficult to get any heroin or weed inside, so perhaps that could be allowed as a privilege for good behaviour in such cases, get to order it from the prison canteen menu :D
I think, as an earned privilege for good behavior, that in the case of legal drugs, then even if not to be sold through the canteen, then friends, loved ones etc. should be able to mail in 'legal highs', 'research chemicals' etc. After all, a happy contented prisoner, is more likely to be a well behaved, model prisoner.
Perhaps some categories of substance should be excluded, and violent prisoners not allowed access to E.g alcohol, stimulants. But otherwise, if its legal, we should be able to have such things mailed in. (not of course that banning the demon drink, actually has any great impact on its ready availability, I used to brew some potent fucking hooch while I was inside. Oranges, lots and lots of fresh oranges, cut up into pieces, a big bag of sugar, and many liters of fresh orange juice from cartons, bit of toast floated on the top, with some bread untoasted, on top of it, and if available, yeast, although that can also be cultured from some fruit skins)
Let it ferment behind the hot water pipes in a big plastic sack, until it swells up, upon which, it needs to be 'burped', and the CO2 released, tied back up and returned to the fermentation.
Takes a bit more than a week, doesn't taste fantastic. But I rather pride myself that I was able to start a minor riot on the wing with that stuff, several prisoners got pissed out of their skulls and went on the rampage xD
The resulting brew from that procedure, gave me a pretty surprisingly potent result, I made the mistake of drinking a liter and a half of the stuff, expecting it to be beer-like in potency, but whilst I don't drink wine, in alcohol content, judging from the dose-response curve it showed, I would hazard a guess that it was more like a very strong, or fortified wine. Had a kick like an angry horse.
-
Society deserves to be protected from criminals that do them harm. There's too many laws which incarcerate people for offenses which don't meet that qualification. Approaching non-violent crime with other measures than incarceration would eliminate the need to be concerned about rehabilitating prisoners.
-
There should be no prisons. Instead everyone should be able to defend themselves with guns. That means that really dangerous persons would in most cases be eliminated by sane persons.
:thumbup:
Prison is the most inhumane thing ever invented.
I don't know about that part. If prisons must exist, then they should suck. The fact they suck is really their only big deterrent. Prisoners have freedom from the responsibilities of existing within a society, a freedom no "free" man will ever know. If it didn't suck then prison might be a little too appealing for some people.
-
Autistic Reporter, Michael Falk, Enchanted By Prison's Rigid Routine (http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=D04wb7P_v-4#ws)
-
:rofl: :LMAO: :rofl:
I can't stop laughing.
:plus:
-
:clap:
-
I fucking love the onion.