INTENSITY²
Politics, Mature and taboo => Political Pundits => Topic started by: BUBBASAURUS_RAEP on February 13, 2013, 07:30:21 PM
-
....A picture is worth a thousand words:
(http://www.traemcneely.com/wp-content/uploads/2012/01/wpid-318573_322488387765058_100000116991214_1451115_1792988135_n1.jpg)
:pwned:
-
Too bad Lit isn't around these days. He would love to debate this, I'm sure. :apondering:
-
Aww, aren't you cute when you're trying to be a good boy!
-
Aww, aren't you cute when you're trying to be a good boy!
And how am I *trying* to be a good boy? :mischief:
Quite frankly, I detest libertarians, anarchists, and other naive idealists who are out of touch with reality.
-
Make me, cunt.
-
Make me, cunt.
U mad, bro?
-
And how am I *trying* to be a good boy? :mischief:
By pleasing Big Brother. :angel:
-
Make me, cunt.
U mad, bro?
lolwut
-
....A picture is worth a thousand words:
(http://www.traemcneely.com/wp-content/uploads/2012/01/wpid-318573_322488387765058_100000116991214_1451115_1792988135_n1.jpg)
:pwned:
I'm sorry, did you have a point hidden here somewhere?
-
I dunno. Half the active members here are not American, and those that are, are not Anarchists or Libertarians.
Net result......
...he just pwned himself. :thumbup: Good job
-
....A picture is worth a thousand words:
(http://www.traemcneely.com/wp-content/uploads/2012/01/wpid-318573_322488387765058_100000116991214_1451115_1792988135_n1.jpg)
:pwned:
I'm sorry, did you have a point hidden here somewhere?
Don't be mean to the vulnerable noobs :'(
-
....A picture is worth a thousand words:
(http://www.traemcneely.com/wp-content/uploads/2012/01/wpid-318573_322488387765058_100000116991214_1451115_1792988135_n1.jpg)
:pwned:
You're trolling of course, but i'll bite. IT appears what you're saying is that everyone has to put up with the corrupt activities of the American government, because everyone else does and the individual is no better than the masses. Right? So if Obama passed a law stating that everyone in the country had to be fucked in the ass daily, would you complain about it and try to fight it, or move to Somalia?
-
....A picture is worth a thousand words:
(http://www.traemcneely.com/wp-content/uploads/2012/01/wpid-318573_322488387765058_100000116991214_1451115_1792988135_n1.jpg)
:pwned:
You're trolling of course, but i'll bite. IT appears what you're saying is that everyone has to put up with the corrupt activities of the American government, because everyone else does and the individual is no better than the masses. Right? So if Obama passed a law stating that everyone in the country had to be fucked in the ass daily, would you complain about it and try to fight it, or move to Somalia?
I'm not actually trolling. My point is that libertarians whine about the government while using services and implementations funded with TAX DOLLAR$. Like electricity and the internets among other things. And if you drive,who the fuckity fuck came up with the funds for the material and labor to build those roads? ? ? ? ? ?
The answer is brought to you by the letter G
-
Ah so you just have a problem with people who whine about our country, but do nothing to make it a better place. I see. Carry on then, Spartan. :thumbup:
-
Ah so you just have a problem with people who whine about our country, but do nothing to make it a better place. I see. Carry on then, Spartan. :thumbup:
Hahahahahah! Not quite. :mischief:
It isn't just the USofA, I have a problem with the whole entire idea and implementation of "limited government". I am however, tired of people whining about government in general as opposed to specific government policies. I hope you understand. ;)
-
The answer is brought to you by the letter G[/b]
:laugh:
-
....A picture is worth a thousand words:
(http://www.traemcneely.com/wp-content/uploads/2012/01/wpid-318573_322488387765058_100000116991214_1451115_1792988135_n1.jpg)
:pwned:
You're trolling of course, but i'll bite. IT appears what you're saying is that everyone has to put up with the corrupt activities of the American government, because everyone else does and the individual is no better than the masses. Right? So if Obama passed a law stating that everyone in the country had to be fucked in the ass daily, would you complain about it and try to fight it, or move to Somalia?
I'm not actually trolling. My point is that libertarians whine about the government while using services and implementations funded with TAX DOLLAR$. Like electricity and the internets among other things. And if you drive,who the fuckity fuck came up with the funds for the material and labor to build those roads? ? ? ? ? ?
The answer is brought to you by the letter G
You are talking out of your arse. Par for the course for you, I know, but the internet, for example, is funded commercially.
-
....A picture is worth a thousand words:
(http://www.traemcneely.com/wp-content/uploads/2012/01/wpid-318573_322488387765058_100000116991214_1451115_1792988135_n1.jpg)
:pwned:
You're trolling of course, but i'll bite. IT appears what you're saying is that everyone has to put up with the corrupt activities of the American government, because everyone else does and the individual is no better than the masses. Right? So if Obama passed a law stating that everyone in the country had to be fucked in the ass daily, would you complain about it and try to fight it, or move to Somalia?
I'm not actually trolling. My point is that libertarians whine about the government while using services and implementations funded with TAX DOLLAR$. Like electricity and the internets among other things. And if you drive,who the fuckity fuck came up with the funds for the material and labor to build those roads? ? ? ? ? ?
The answer is brought to you by the letter G
You are talking out of your arse. Par for the course for you, I know, but the internet, for example, is funded commercially.
Pretty sure that the internet was developed from the ARPAnet(in fact, the internet is the successor to the ARPAnet)which was a government funded project started in the early 1970s. The main idea was originally as a means of communicating in the aftermath of a nuclear war. TCP/IP was developed some 30 years ago and it wasn't until 1992 the the internet was declassified and made public. Thank the National Science Foundation.
-
The Internet is commercially funded and without any central governing body. The ARPANET was *one* of the predecessors, yes, and partly funded by the DoD, but also by UCLA, Stanford and two other unis. Its point was never to be the means to communicate after a nuclear war. That's just another myth and another example of your talking out of your arse. And it was actually closed down. There is a report floating around the interwebz about it.
There were a few European efforts as well, most with universities being heavily involved. And, of course, there was CERN whose scientists eventually came up with things like hypertext, the internet browser and HTML. The world wide web was born at CERN and was proposed by a British scientist, Sir Tim Berners-Lee.
TCP is about 40 years old, if memory serves. The IP address scheme that added that /IP suffix is a bit younger, I think. The Internet as a name is almost as old but gained widespread use during the 80s, especially at universities where you could access it. Then, of course, the Usenet was far more useful.
If the Internet was classified, it was the worst kept secret *ever*. But it wasn't. You don't know what you are talking about.
-
The Internet is commercially funded and without any central governing body. The ARPANET was *one* of the predecessors, yes, and partly funded by the DoD, but also by UCLA, Stanford and two other unis. Its point was never to be the means to communicate after a nuclear war. That's just another myth and another example of your talking out of your arse. And it was actually closed down. There is a report floating around the interwebz about it.
There were a few European efforts as well, most with universities being heavily involved. And, of course, there was CERN whose scientists eventually came up with things like hypertext, the internet browser and HTML. The world wide web was born at CERN and was proposed by a British scientist, Sir Tim Berners-Lee.
TCP is about 40 years old, if memory serves. The IP address scheme that added that /IP suffix is a bit younger, I think. The Internet as a name is almost as old but gained widespread use during the 80s, especially at universities where you could access it. Then, of course, the Usenet was far more useful.
If the Internet was classified, it was the worst kept secret *ever*. But it wasn't. You don't know what you are talking about.
Nice wikipedia quoting there, buggeroo.
This does not change the fact that had it not been for government funding from DARPA and the NSF, the internet wouldn't be here Dumbass. I am well aware that it has been privatized. And now there is LambdaRail which is purely academic for the time being(just like the internet back in the 1980s) but will mos
Who the fuck other than the government is going to pay for rural highways that are often not used???
-
The Internet is commercially funded and without any central governing body. The ARPANET was *one* of the predecessors, yes, and partly funded by the DoD, but also by UCLA, Stanford and two other unis. Its point was never to be the means to communicate after a nuclear war. That's just another myth and another example of your talking out of your arse. And it was actually closed down. There is a report floating around the interwebz about it.
There were a few European efforts as well, most with universities being heavily involved. And, of course, there was CERN whose scientists eventually came up with things like hypertext, the internet browser and HTML. The world wide web was born at CERN and was proposed by a British scientist, Sir Tim Berners-Lee.
TCP is about 40 years old, if memory serves. The IP address scheme that added that /IP suffix is a bit younger, I think. The Internet as a name is almost as old but gained widespread use during the 80s, especially at universities where you could access it. Then, of course, the Usenet was far more useful.
If the Internet was classified, it was the worst kept secret *ever*. But it wasn't. You don't know what you are talking about.
Nice wikipedia quoting there, buggeroo.
This does not change the fact that had it not been for government funding from DARPA and the NSF, the internet wouldn't be here Dumbass. I am well aware that it has been privatized. And now there is LambdaRail which is purely academic for the time being(just like the internet back in the 1980s) but will mos
Who the fuck other than the government is going to pay for rural highways that are often not used???
It wasn't Wikipedia quoting, dear. It just so happens that I work in this particular field and know a lot about our history. History is important.
I notice you thought it best to comment further on your numerous foot-in-mouth moments. Lucky for you I'm here, then, don't you think? Why not tell us more about that declassification in 1992? Or perhaps the interwebz legend you bought into when believing the nuclear war rumours?
The internet, btw, was not in academia only in the 80s. Perhaps I'd better make this explicit to you: http://public.web.cern.ch/public/ (http://public.web.cern.ch/public/)
Tbh, I don't give a shit about your rural highways. I don't use them and don't care. Rant all you want about them. Should you produce further falsifications about matters that concern me I shall be forced to react again.
:-*
-
The Internet is commercially funded and without any central governing body. The ARPANET was *one* of the predecessors, yes, and partly funded by the DoD, but also by UCLA, Stanford and two other unis. Its point was never to be the means to communicate after a nuclear war. That's just another myth and another example of your talking out of your arse. And it was actually closed down. There is a report floating around the interwebz about it.
There were a few European efforts as well, most with universities being heavily involved. And, of course, there was CERN whose scientists eventually came up with things like hypertext, the internet browser and HTML. The world wide web was born at CERN and was proposed by a British scientist, Sir Tim Berners-Lee.
TCP is about 40 years old, if memory serves. The IP address scheme that added that /IP suffix is a bit younger, I think. The Internet as a name is almost as old but gained widespread use during the 80s, especially at universities where you could access it. Then, of course, the Usenet was far more useful.
If the Internet was classified, it was the worst kept secret *ever*. But it wasn't. You don't know what you are talking about.
Nice wikipedia quoting there, buggeroo.
This does not change the fact that had it not been for government funding from DARPA and the NSF, the internet wouldn't be here Dumbass. I am well aware that it has been privatized. And now there is LambdaRail which is purely academic for the time being(just like the internet back in the 1980s) but will mos
Who the fuck other than the government is going to pay for rural highways that are often not used???
It wasn't Wikipedia quoting, dear. It just so happens that I work in this particular field and know a lot about our history. History is important.
I notice you thought it best to comment further on your numerous foot-in-mouth moments. Lucky for you I'm here, then, don't you think? Why not tell us more about that declassification in 1992? Or perhaps the interwebz legend you bought into when believing the nuclear war rumours?
The internet, btw, was not in academia only in the 80s. Perhaps I'd better make this explicit to you: http://public.web.cern.ch/public/ (http://public.web.cern.ch/public/)
Tbh, I don't give a shit about your rural highways. I don't use them and don't care. Rant all you want about them. Should you produce further falsifications about matters that concern me I shall be forced to react again.
:-*
I also don't give a shit about rural highways either. But urban streets and bridges are also built and maintained with tax dollars. And my point about the internet remains: Had it not been for government funding to get the project started, it would never have been built. The fact that it is now decentralized and maintained by the private sector does not contradict this fact. It is profitable now to maintain the information infrastructure because of the fact that the internet is used by the public for commerce. End of story.
-
Ah so you just have a problem with people who whine about our country, but do nothing to make it a better place. I see. Carry on then, Spartan. :thumbup:
Hahahahahah! Not quite. :mischief:
It isn't just the USofA, I have a problem with the whole entire idea and implementation of "limited government". I am however, tired of people whining about government in general as opposed to specific government policies. I hope you understand. ;)
I do indeed. It makes me long to get my hands around their necks.
-
I also don't give a shit about rural highways either. But urban streets and bridges are also built and maintained with tax dollars. And my point about the internet remains: Had it not been for government funding to get the project started, it would never have been built. The fact that it is now decentralized and maintained by the private sector does not contradict this fact. It is profitable now to maintain the information infrastructure because of the fact that the internet is used by the public for commerce. End of story.
But the ARPANET was not the start of the internet. Several universities preceded it and yet others were busy building networks at the same time. I suggest you to do a simple Google search to confirm this. I'm pretty sure the internet would exist without it, considering how many parallel efforts there were.
Also, I suggest you stop talking out of your arse. The above is in many ways even further from what happened and what still is happening. You ending a lie with "end of story" doesn't change anything, it just makes you look like an idiot.
Now tell me all about the big declassification of the internet in 1992. I'm all ears.
-
I also don't give a shit about rural highways either. But urban streets and bridges are also built and maintained with tax dollars. And my point about the internet remains: Had it not been for government funding to get the project started, it would never have been built. The fact that it is now decentralized and maintained by the private sector does not contradict this fact. It is profitable now to maintain the information infrastructure because of the fact that the internet is used by the public for commerce. End of story.
But the ARPANET was not the start of the internet. Several universities preceded it and yet others were busy building networks at the same time. I suggest you to do a simple Google search to confirm this. I'm pretty sure the internet would exist without it, considering how many parallel efforts there were.
Also, I suggest you stop talking out of your arse. The above is in many ways even further from what happened and what still is happening. You ending a lie with "end of story" doesn't change anything, it just makes you look like an idiot.
Now tell me all about the big declassification of the internet in 1992. I'm all ears.
This is a birdwalk, kid. Do you have a point about the main topic here? I am aware that packet switching was developed before the ARPANET and there were already packet switching networks that preceded it. These were mainly implemented at academic institutions and it wasn't until several computer scientists approached DARPA(a federally funded think tank) that they finally got the funding to construct the ARPANET. The National Science Foundation(also a government agency provided funding and resources to complete standardize TCP/IP by the early 80s............And thus the Internet was born. My point still stands: Without the federal funding from the NSF and initially from DARPA, there would be no fucking internet! In my country, government and the private sector have a symbiotic relationship. In fact, Uncle Sam could set up a project that would generate revenue by selling commodities or manufactured goods to foreign nations and get money from sources other than tax payers. YOU are talking out of your asshole by throwing red herrings. This isn't solely about the Internet, it's about all the things that government pays for which our lives depend on(and that are used by the private sector for commerce).
-
It's about credibility. You exposing yourself as ignorant in one topic will affect everything else you say.
And "kid"? Are you really that old?
Still waiting to hear about the great declassification of 1992.
-
It's about credibility. You exposing yourself as ignorant in one topic will affect everything else you say.
And "kid"? Are you really that old?
Still waiting to hear about the great declassification of 1992.
Regardless, you don't seem to understand the concept of consistency. None of your corrections about internet history contradict my main point nor do they discredit it. ;)
-
I'm so sorry. Did you have an actual point?
Still waiting.
-
40 years ago, the vast majority of people in the world did not have personal computers. The very first one was the Kenbak-1 in 1971 which was produced only for 2 years until '73 when the company went out of business. So clearly, having a WAN to connect home computers and businesses was not profitable.
Corporations exist to make a profit and they have no financial incentive to care about what people need unless they can make money doing it. That is why government funding is important, necessary, and quite frankly VITAL.
It is for example, technologically possible to create a wireless power grid. However, since anyone with the proper tools could use it free of charge it is not going to be built. The very first telecommunications satellites where launch with rockets designed and built by NASA, also a government agency. The fact that space is now being privatized doesn't imply that Space Technology could have, or would have come about entirely by means of the private sector.
-
I'm so sorry. Did you have an actual point?
Still waiting.
Yes I did. And I guess I have to repeat myself A-GAINNNNN: Modern civilization, particularly infrastructure and utilities, depends on Goverment.
-
Why do you have such a stick up your ass about the government being good guys?
-
Why do you have such a stick up your ass about the government being good guys?
Because they're intoxicated on unbridled idealism.
-
I'm so sorry. Did you have an actual point?
Still waiting.
Yes I did. And I guess I have to repeat myself A-GAINNNNN: Modern civilization, particularly infrastructure and utilities, depends on Goverment.
Yes that is true and I think most limited government types would agree with you but government has become frighteningly big with all sorts of creep regulating and trying to control all sorts of things they should stay out of, from collecting rain water (http://itmakessenseblog.com/2012/07/31/big-government-run-amok-an-oregon-man-was-sentenced-to-30-days-in-jail-for-collecting-rainwater-on-his-property/) to saving birds (http://www.wusa9.com/news/article/161065/158/Woodpecker-Saving-Daughter-Costs-Mom-500) and SWAT raids over raw milk (http://www.naturalnews.com/033220_Rawesome_Foods_armed_raids.html) . Government is a necessity as are taxes to take care of things such as infrastructure, national defense , education and of course civil defense. The government should not be spending money on things like studying the effects of cocaine on the sex drives of Japanese quail (http://cnsnews.com/node/69351) , $315 million dollar bridge to an island with a population of 50 (http://www.helium.com/items/94264-pork-barrel-spending-in-washington-wastes-tax-dollars) , and 16-20 million for Indonesians to get their master's degrees (http://www.wnd.com/2012/02/u-s-paying-for-indonesians-masters-degrees/)
-
Why do you have such a stick up your ass about the government being good guys?
Because they're intoxicated on unbridled idealism.
Wait, what? Being untoxicated on unbridled idealism is what makes the government good? Am I understanding you right?
-
I'm so sorry. Did you have an actual point?
Still waiting.
Yes I did. And I guess I have to repeat myself A-GAINNNNN: Modern civilization, particularly infrastructure and utilities, depends on Goverment.
And so you made up stuff about teh interwebz to support this notion. Well done.
Still waiting to hear about the great declassification of 1992.
-
40 years ago, the vast majority of people in the world did not have personal computers. The very first one was the Kenbak-1 in 1971 which was produced only for 2 years until '73 when the company went out of business. So clearly, having a WAN to connect home computers and businesses was not profitable.
Corporations exist to make a profit and they have no financial incentive to care about what people need unless they can make money doing it. That is why government funding is important, necessary, and quite frankly VITAL.
It is for example, technologically possible to create a wireless power grid. However, since anyone with the proper tools could use it free of charge it is not going to be built. The very first telecommunications satellites where launch with rockets designed and built by NASA, also a government agency. The fact that space is now being privatized doesn't imply that Space Technology could have, or would have come about entirely by means of the private sector.
Are you going to admit that you were talking out of your arse when making things up about the birth of the internet?
-
40 years ago, the vast majority of people in the world did not have personal computers. The very first one was the Kenbak-1 in 1971 which was produced only for 2 years until '73 when the company went out of business. So clearly, having a WAN to connect home computers and businesses was not profitable.
Corporations exist to make a profit and they have no financial incentive to care about what people need unless they can make money doing it. That is why government funding is important, necessary, and quite frankly VITAL.
It is for example, technologically possible to create a wireless power grid. However, since anyone with the proper tools could use it free of charge it is not going to be built. The very first telecommunications satellites where launch with rockets designed and built by NASA, also a government agency. The fact that space is now being privatized doesn't imply that Space Technology could have, or would have come about entirely by means of the private sector.
Are you going to admit that you were talking out of your arse when making things up about the birth of the internet?
Look kid, the fact is the internet is the successor to the ARPANET(which was federally funded by the Department of Defense). I know how much you'd like to believe that this is made up but it ain't. Now in 1992, the internet was privatized and accessible to the general public.
-
40 years ago, the vast majority of people in the world did not have personal computers. The very first one was the Kenbak-1 in 1971 which was produced only for 2 years until '73 when the company went out of business. So clearly, having a WAN to connect home computers and businesses was not profitable.
Corporations exist to make a profit and they have no financial incentive to care about what people need unless they can make money doing it. That is why government funding is important, necessary, and quite frankly VITAL.
It is for example, technologically possible to create a wireless power grid. However, since anyone with the proper tools could use it free of charge it is not going to be built. The very first telecommunications satellites where launch with rockets designed and built by NASA, also a government agency. The fact that space is now being privatized doesn't imply that Space Technology could have, or would have come about entirely by means of the private sector.
Are you going to admit that you were talking out of your arse when making things up about the birth of the internet?
Look kid, the fact is the internet is the successor to the ARPANET(which was federally funded by the Department of Defense). I know how much you'd like to believe that this is made up but it ain't. Now in 1992, the internet was privatized and accessible to the general public.
:LMAO:
-
iWIN! :pwned:
-
:LMAO:
You might want to look up the facts on the internet. That is, if it has been declassified in the caves where you live.
-
And he still hasn't answered my question.
-
Give him time. He isn't very bright.
-
And he still hasn't answered my question.
Who me? I most certainly did.
-
The one after that. About government being idealists.
-
And I'd still like to know more about the great declassification of 1992.
-
Why do you have such a stick up your ass about the government being good guys?
Because they're intoxicated on unbridled idealism.
Wait, what? Being untoxicated on unbridled idealism is what makes the government good? Am I understanding you right?
First of all, since am I one of those government being good guys your original question makes no sense. I say that those who believe government is all bad and that society would be better off without are the ones who are intoxicated on unbridled idealism and lack understand of human behavior.
-
Aww, aren't you cute when you're trying to be a good boy!
And how am I *trying* to be a good boy? :mischief:
Quite frankly, I detest libertarians, anarchists, and other naive idealists who are out of touch with reality.
Hoping you realise that most of the Tea Party are libertarians, they are for the closing down of most government functions.
and of course want to get the 'nigger' out the white house.
As long as they are in control of the House and hold the Senate hostage with the threat of filibuster, nothing in our country will improve.
So government? Meh.
As long as they are there ..... fuck the government
I do like nice roads (sic) and safe food tho.
While we are on the subject of fuck this and fuck that
Go fuck yourself in the ear
-
Aww, aren't you cute when you're trying to be a good boy!
And how am I *trying* to be a good boy? :mischief:
Quite frankly, I detest libertarians, anarchists, and other naive idealists who are out of touch with reality.
Hoping you realise that most of the Tea Party are libertarians, they are for the closing down of most government functions.
and of course want to get the 'nigger' out the white house.
As long as they are in control of the House and hold the Senate hostage with the threat of filibuster, nothing in our country will improve.
So government? Meh.
As long as they are there ..... fuck the government
I do like nice roads (sic) and safe food tho.
While we are on the subject of fuck this and fuck that
Go fuck yourself in the ear
Go fuck yourself in the ass.
-
Aww, aren't you cute when you're trying to be a good boy!
And how am I *trying* to be a good boy? :mischief:
Quite frankly, I detest libertarians, anarchists, and other naive idealists who are out of touch with reality.
Hoping you realise that most of the Tea Party are libertarians, they are for the closing down of most government functions.
and of course want to get the 'nigger' out the white house.
As long as they are in control of the House and hold the Senate hostage with the threat of filibuster, nothing in our country will improve.
So government? Meh.
As long as they are there ..... fuck the government
I do like nice roads (sic) and safe food tho.
While we are on the subject of fuck this and fuck that
Go fuck yourself in the ear
Go fuck yourself in the ass.
would much rather hear about you fucking yourself, boy.
-
Skyblue1 babbled:
would much rather hear about you fucking yourself, boy.
(http://weknowmemes.com/generator/uploads/generated/g1333087919149047751.jpg)
-
I'd still like to know more about the great declassification of 1992.
-
I'd still like to know more about the great declassification of 1992.
The internet went public in 1992. By that I mean that anyone and everyone could access it. NOT just people with computer accounts at academic institutions! Keep beating around the bush, kid. Nothing you said contradicts my point. ;)
-
I'd still like to know more about the great declassification of 1992.
The internet went public in 1992. By that I mean that anyone and everyone could access it. NOT just people with computer accounts at academic institutions! Keep beating around the bush, kid. Nothing you said contradicts my point. ;)
Odeon's hardly a kid, you must be a very old man. :oldman:
-
The internet went public in 1992. By that I mean that anyone and everyone could access it. NOT just people with computer accounts at academic institutions! Keep beating around the bush, kid. Nothing you said contradicts my point. ;)
What's a "computer account", and how would you access the internet without one?
Mon petit imbécile :eyelash:
-
I'd still like to know more about the great declassification of 1992.
The internet went public in 1992. By that I mean that anyone and everyone could access it. NOT just people with computer accounts at academic institutions! Keep beating around the bush, kid. Nothing you said contradicts my point. ;)
And now that the government isn't running look how much better it is :zoinks:
(http://www.toptitties.com/actions/thumb.html?u=23918&s=1&t=2)
(http://www.toptitties.com/actions/thumb.html?u=22997&s=1&t=2)
(http://www.toptitties.com/actions/thumb.html?u=22238&s=3&t=2)
-
:agreed: :thumbup:
-
The internet went public in 1992. By that I mean that anyone and everyone could access it. NOT just people with computer accounts at academic institutions! Keep beating around the bush, kid. Nothing you said contradicts my point. ;)
What's a "computer account", and how would you access the internet without one?
Mon petit imbécile :eyelash:
Red herring. If you were attending an academic institution then you could get an account.....Perhaps some of these institutions allowed campus visitors to use their internet connections with permission, but I digress. The point is that 30 years ago the internet was not yet commercial so not just any old body could use it. Unless of course, you were David Lightman. :indeed:
-
The internet went public in 1992. By that I mean that anyone and everyone could access it. NOT just people with computer accounts at academic institutions! Keep beating around the bush, kid. Nothing you said contradicts my point. ;)
What's a "computer account", and how would you access the internet without one?
Mon petit imbécile :eyelash:
Red herring. If you were attending an academic institution then you could get an account.....Perhaps some of these institutions allowed campus visitors to use their internet connections with permission, but I digress. The point is that 30 years ago the internet was not yet commercial so not just any old body could use it. Unless of course, you were David Lightman. :indeed:
Why digress? You were disproving your own point quite nicely.
-
I'd still like to know more about the great declassification of 1992.
The internet went public in 1992. By that I mean that anyone and everyone could access it. NOT just people with computer accounts at academic institutions! Keep beating around the bush, kid. Nothing you said contradicts my point. ;)
This contradicts your point. (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/History_of_the_Internet) Please point out the great declassification of 1992 in that article or provide a reliable reference of your own. Keep posting nonsense and I will keep on asking you to tell more about that fabrication of yours.
Now, I know what you'll say--the Scientific and Advanced-Technology Act came in 1992. Problem is, the Internet was public in the 80s; the 1992 act simply opened up a few networks that weren't generally accessible before that, which is what Wikipedia will point out.
And then you'll most likely try with 1995, and probably find another few years to suggest, in an attempt to save face. You might even believe some of it yourself, feeling validated when you can find something, anything to support your initial lie.
But it won't be true. Kid.
-
The internet went public in 1992. By that I mean that anyone and everyone could access it. NOT just people with computer accounts at academic institutions! Keep beating around the bush, kid. Nothing you said contradicts my point. ;)
What's a "computer account", and how would you access the internet without one?
Mon petit imbécile :eyelash:
Red herring. If you were attending an academic institution then you could get an account.....Perhaps some of these institutions allowed campus visitors to use their internet connections with permission, but I digress. The point is that 30 years ago the internet was not yet commercial so not just any old body could use it. Unless of course, you were David Lightman. :indeed:
I feel that makes a good case for less government not more. Sure they developed the internet but it did not become what it is today till they let it go.
-
Why do you have such a stick up your ass about the government being good guys?
Because they're intoxicated on unbridled idealism.
Wait, what? Being untoxicated on unbridled idealism is what makes the government good? Am I understanding you right?
First of all, since am I one of those government being good guys your original question makes no sense. I say that those who believe government is all bad and that society would be better off without are the ones who are intoxicated on unbridled idealism and lack understand of human behavior.
I see a spark of a good point in this but, but its floating in some shit. Let me clarify. Yes the government does not consist of 100% corrupt and generally nasty people. A small fraction of people involved in politics in general actually do care, and would do anything in their power to better the freedoms and quality of life enjoyed in any modern culture.
But.....
The vast majority of all politicians use their position to obtain a wide variety of benefits at the expense of others, or are employed by corporate intrests which use them as a proxy for these goals. This is just a FACT, man. The vast majority of all mankind would behave this way, because they really don't care about the welfare of others in layered extremes. Some outside their country, demographic, demographic of their country, race, religion, immediate family, themselves, etc.
Lets keep it real bro. Lets look at the world with our big boy glasses and see it for what it really is. Dog eat dog.
-
Why do you have such a stick up your ass about the government being good guys?
Because they're intoxicated on unbridled idealism.
Wait, what? Being untoxicated on unbridled idealism is what makes the government good? Am I understanding you right?
First of all, since am I one of those government being good guys your original question makes no sense. I say that those who believe government is all bad and that society would be better off without are the ones who are intoxicated on unbridled idealism and lack understand of human behavior.
I see a spark of a good point in this but, but its floating in some shit. Let me clarify. Yes the government does not consist of 100% corrupt and generally nasty people. A small fraction of people involved in politics in general actually do care, and would do anything in their power to better the freedoms and quality of life enjoyed in any modern culture.
But.....
The vast majority of all politicians use their position to obtain a wide variety of benefits at the expense of others, or are employed by corporate intrests which use them as a proxy for these goals. This is just a FACT, man. The vast majority of all mankind would behave this way, because they really don't care about the welfare of others in layered extremes. Some outside their country, demographic, demographic of their country, race, religion, immediate family, themselves, etc.
Lets keep it real bro. Lets look at the world with our big boy glasses and see it for what it really is. Dog eat dog.
Holy shit! A point! How ever did you find the time? ;)
-
Why do you have such a stick up your ass about the government being good guys?
Because they're intoxicated on unbridled idealism.
Wait, what? Being untoxicated on unbridled idealism is what makes the government good? Am I understanding you right?
First of all, since am I one of those government being good guys your original question makes no sense. I say that those who believe government is all bad and that society would be better off without are the ones who are intoxicated on unbridled idealism and lack understand of human behavior.
I see a spark of a good point in this but, but its floating in some shit. Let me clarify. Yes the government does not consist of 100% corrupt and generally nasty people. A small fraction of people involved in politics in general actually do care, and would do anything in their power to better the freedoms and quality of life enjoyed in any modern culture.
But.....
The vast majority of all politicians use their position to obtain a wide variety of benefits at the expense of others, or are employed by corporate intrests which use them as a proxy for these goals. This is just a FACT, man. The vast majority of all mankind would behave this way, because they really don't care about the welfare of others in layered extremes. Some outside their country, demographic, demographic of their country, race, religion, immediate family, themselves, etc.
Lets keep it real bro. Lets look at the world with our big boy glasses and see it for what it really is. Dog eat dog.
Holy shit! A point! How ever did you find the time? ;)
Lol cause I happen to be at my computer, at college, writing about the same exact thing for an english assignment. Doesn't divert from the routine and rituals too much.
-
Why do you have such a stick up your ass about the government being good guys?
Because they're intoxicated on unbridled idealism.
Wait, what? Being untoxicated on unbridled idealism is what makes the government good? Am I understanding you right?
First of all, since am I one of those government being good guys your original question makes no sense. I say that those who believe government is all bad and that society would be better off without are the ones who are intoxicated on unbridled idealism and lack understand of human behavior.
I see a spark of a good point in this but, but its floating in some shit. Let me clarify. Yes the government does not consist of 100% corrupt and generally nasty people. A small fraction of people involved in politics in general actually do care, and would do anything in their power to better the freedoms and quality of life enjoyed in any modern culture.
But.....
The vast majority of all politicians use their position to obtain a wide variety of benefits at the expense of others, or are employed by corporate intrests which use them as a proxy for these goals. This is just a FACT, man. The vast majority of all mankind would behave this way, because they really don't care about the welfare of others in layered extremes. Some outside their country, demographic, demographic of their country, race, religion, immediate family, themselves, etc.
Lets keep it real bro. Lets look at the world with our big boy glasses and see it for what it really is. Dog eat dog.
Holy shit! A point! How ever did you find the time? ;)
Lol cause I happen to be at my computer, at college, writing about the same exact thing for an english assignment. Doesn't divert from the routine and rituals too much.
Uh huh. Every response you make on here from now on is tangentially related to something else you are doing for your busy life, and that is why you can respond to everyone but me. Not cuz you are hiding, no, not at all. I believe you. So does everyone else. :viking:
-
Somalia...you men the Islamic Republic that serves as a base for pirates that no one cares about?
Why don't all of you liberal and conservative controlfags move there.
-
Why digress? You were disproving your own point quite nicely.
And how was I disproving my point that government is a necessity and ultimately was necessary for the development of the internet, eh? :wanker:
-
Why do you have such a stick up your ass about the government being good guys?
Because they're intoxicated on unbridled idealism.
Wait, what? Being untoxicated on unbridled idealism is what makes the government good? Am I understanding you right?
First of all, since am I one of those government being good guys your original question makes no sense. I say that those who believe government is all bad and that society would be better off without are the ones who are intoxicated on unbridled idealism and lack understand of human behavior.
I see a spark of a good point in this but, but its floating in some shit. Let me clarify. Yes the government does not consist of 100% corrupt and generally nasty people. A small fraction of people involved in politics in general actually do care, and would do anything in their power to better the freedoms and quality of life enjoyed in any modern culture.
But.....
The vast majority of all politicians use their position to obtain a wide variety of benefits at the expense of others, or are employed by corporate intrests which use them as a proxy for these goals. This is just a FACT, man. The vast majority of all mankind would behave this way, because they really don't care about the welfare of others in layered extremes. Some outside their country, demographic, demographic of their country, race, religion, immediate family, themselves, etc.
Lets keep it real bro. Lets look at the world with our big boy glasses and see it for what it really is. Dog eat dog.
Yup. Government is a necessary evil if you will.
-
Why do you have such a stick up your ass about the government being good guys?
Because they're intoxicated on unbridled idealism.
Wait, what? Being untoxicated on unbridled idealism is what makes the government good? Am I understanding you right?
First of all, since am I one of those government being good guys your original question makes no sense. I say that those who believe government is all bad and that society would be better off without are the ones who are intoxicated on unbridled idealism and lack understand of human behavior.
I see a spark of a good point in this but, but its floating in some shit. Let me clarify. Yes the government does not consist of 100% corrupt and generally nasty people. A small fraction of people involved in politics in general actually do care, and would do anything in their power to better the freedoms and quality of life enjoyed in any modern culture.
But.....
The vast majority of all politicians use their position to obtain a wide variety of benefits at the expense of others, or are employed by corporate intrests which use them as a proxy for these goals. This is just a FACT, man. The vast majority of all mankind would behave this way, because they really don't care about the welfare of others in layered extremes. Some outside their country, demographic, demographic of their country, race, religion, immediate family, themselves, etc.
Lets keep it real bro. Lets look at the world with our big boy glasses and see it for what it really is. Dog eat dog.
Holy shit! A point! How ever did you find the time? ;)
Lol cause I happen to be at my computer, at college, writing about the same exact thing for an english assignment. Doesn't divert from the routine and rituals too much.
Uh huh. Every response you make on here from now on is tangentially related to something else you are doing for your busy life, and that is why you can respond to everyone but me. Not cuz you are hiding, no, not at all. I believe you. So does everyone else. :viking:
Actually, i'm responding to things that are related to what i'm thinking about at the time because its faster. I don't respond to you as often and tell you i'm busy, because I am. You don't want to actually debate, or make a decent point with me. You just want to beat around the bush and avoid the actual points like a dick.
You say i'm avoiding things, but debating with you makes if very clear that you are describing yourself. Ready for a debate without all the playing around and politicking? I'm totally game man.
-
It depends on which librarians or antichrists one is referring to.
-
You just want to beat around the bush and avoid the actual points like a dick.
You have yet to make an assertion that requested a response. I have had a list of questions posted to you (twice now) for over a week. Yeah, I'M the one beating around the bush and avoiding answering YOU. :M
-
You say i'm avoiding things, but debating with you makes if very clear that you are describing yourself. Ready for a debate without all the playing around and politicking? I'm totally game man.
Excellent. Start by answering the questions you have been avoiding for a week now.
-
You say i'm avoiding things, but debating with you makes if very clear that you are describing yourself. Ready for a debate without all the playing around and politicking? I'm totally game man.
Excellent. Start by answering the questions you have been avoiding for a week now.
Splendid. Present them. Valid questions only, please. No personal bs, and no disguised trolling. Lets have a real debate.
-
You say i'm avoiding things, but debating with you makes if very clear that you are describing yourself. Ready for a debate without all the playing around and politicking? I'm totally game man.
Excellent. Start by answering the questions you have been avoiding for a week now.
Splendid. Present them. Valid questions only, please. No personal bs, and no disguised trolling. Lets have a real debate.
:lol1: :lol1: :lol1:
You want me to pose them a third time? How long does this delaying tactic work? It gains you 2 minutes maybe?
-
You say i'm avoiding things, but debating with you makes if very clear that you are describing yourself. Ready for a debate without all the playing around and politicking? I'm totally game man.
Excellent. Start by answering the questions you have been avoiding for a week now.
Splendid. Present them. Valid questions only, please. No personal bs, and no disguised trolling. Lets have a real debate.
:lol1: :lol1: :lol1:
You want me to pose them a third time? How long does this delaying tactic work? It gains you 2 minutes maybe?
After carefully looking, I realized that the question you were posing confused me. I did not understand it as a question.
-
You just want to beat around the bush and avoid the actual points like a dick.
You have yet to make an assertion that requested a response. I have had a list of questions posted to you (twice now) for over a week. Yeah, I'M the one beating around the bush and avoiding answering YOU. :M
You most certainly ARE beating around the Bush along with your boyfriend Odeon. You have nothing intelligent or pertinent to contribute to this discussion. Time to go play outside for a bit, kiddo.
-
I notice you now avoid the little matter of the internets. :zoinks:
-
I notice you now avoid the little matter of the internets. :zoinks:
So are you a libertarian or are you just giving me shit?
-
Aw, it's no fun to troll when when nobody's willing to get butthurt, is it? :P
-
Aspierogue prefers to hurt butts in person, so don't accept any drinks from him or sleep over on his couch.
-
Ooh, another n00b. Welcome, etc.
-
привет ребёнок
-
I want Anton F and AspieRogue to become good friends and chat to each other.
-
They already are, judging from my inbox. :P
-
Maybe they're really good friends? :eyebrows:
-
They might well be.
-
(http://www.deviantart.com/download/159392624/Troll_Love_by_madcarrot.jpg)
-
I want Anton F and AspieRogue to become good friends and chat to each other.
They already are, judging from my inbox. :P
Maybe they're really good friends? :eyebrows:
(http://weknowmemes.com/generator/uploads/generated/g1333087919149047751.jpg)
-
(http://www.deviantart.com/download/159392624/Troll_Love_by_madcarrot.jpg)
Yep, that's about the size of it.
-
I want Anton F and AspieRogue to become good friends and chat to each other.
They already are, judging from my inbox. :P
Maybe they're really good friends? :eyebrows:
(http://weknowmemes.com/generator/uploads/generated/g1333087919149047751.jpg)
^We'd know you didn't mean it. You obviously care.
-
I want Anton F and AspieRogue to become good friends and chat to each other.
They already are, judging from my inbox. :P
Maybe they're really good friends? :eyebrows:
(http://weknowmemes.com/generator/uploads/generated/g1333087919149047751.jpg)
^We'd know you didn't mean it. You obviously care.
Time to fill out one of this, Odeon:
(http://www.operatorchan.org/sug/src/135262711484.jpg)
-
Odeon Butthurt? Nah. You projecting or are you really trying to convince other that anything you say may have some credibility. Personally I think you like seeing your own words on the screen. I think you want to believe that at best you are an inciter, an agitator, or an alpha male :lol1:
The truth is, you are a loser, an internerd who's only achievement to date is talking bullshit on internet forums. A small, old internet forum filled with reject Aspies and this is where you invest your efforts.
We have seen you before. Not you personally but your type. You are not a precious unique snowflake. You are one of an army of fallen members in here. Members who come in and talk shit and get an almost sexual thrill of the thought of stirring up a membership. They kid themselves that they are making an impression. The truth is that they aren't and whilst they believe they are playing members, the embers are entertaining themselves. We like a bit of flavour here and variety. But then you are not new and your drama not fresh and we move on to the next thing and you leave in tears.
You sometimes come back. When you do we remember but so long as you bring something new and fresh we will humour you for a bit.
We know you. You re not that special.
-
Actually, we have seen him before. Both him and his type.
-
Odeon Butthurt? Nah. You projecting or are you really trying to convince other that anything you say may have some credibility. Personally I think you like seeing your own words on the screen. I think you want to believe that at best you are an inciter, an agitator, or an alpha male :lol1:
The truth is, you are a loser, an internerd who's only achievement to date is talking bullshit on internet forums. A small, old internet forum filled with reject Aspies and this is where you invest your efforts.
We have seen you before. Not you personally but your type. You are not a precious unique snowflake. You are one of an army of fallen members in here. Members who come in and talk shit and get an almost sexual thrill of the thought of stirring up a membership. They kid themselves that they are making an impression. The truth is that they aren't and whilst they believe they are playing members, the embers are entertaining themselves. We like a bit of flavour here and variety. But then you are not new and your drama not fresh and we move on to the next thing and you leave in tears.
You sometimes come back. When you do we remember but so long as you bring something new and fresh we will humour you for a bit.
We know you. You re not that special.
TL;DR;Faggot :hahaha:
-
The Anton_F sock has a profile on okstupid (http://www.okcupid.com). His username = SillySmartie
-
You really are incredibly boring. You do know that, right?
-
You really are incredibly boring. You do know that, right?
Projecting again now, are we? (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Psychological_projection)
-
You really are incredibly boring. You do know that, right?
Projecting again now, are we? (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Psychological_projection)
Its OK we know what projecting means. We also know a "No You"when we see it.
-
You really are incredibly boring. You do know that, right?
Projecting again now, are we? (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Psychological_projection)
Its OK we know what projecting means. We also know a "No You"when we see it.
Look bub, I know you're gay and you want me to be gay too.....but it's just not gonna happen.
And srsly? This shit's gettin old.
FYI: I don't usually stick around here that long since this place is boring enough to try the patience of a catatonic; thanks to retarded losers like you and your many boyfriends ITF.
-
FYI: I don't usually stick around here that long since this place is boring enough to try the patience of a catatonic; thanks to retarded losers like you and your many boyfriends ITF.
And yet, here you are with a new account.
-
Look bub, I know you're gay and you want me to be gay too.....but it's just not gonna happen.
The I know you are but what am I? gambit. :thumbup: I recall that being pretty cutting edge in 1st grade.
And srsly? This shit's gettin old.
Does somebody need a hug? :hug:
FYI: I don't usually stick around here that long since this place is boring enough to try the patience of a catatonic; thanks to retarded losers like you and your many boyfriends ITF.
:lol1:
-
Look bub, I know you're gay and you want me to be gay too.....but it's just not gonna happen.
The I know you are but what am I? gambit. :thumbup:
It works. ;)
-
You probably are capable of intelligent discourse if you cared to bother.
-
You probably are capable of intelligent discourse if you cared to bother.
Tis true. But unfortunately there is so little of that here @ I^2 these days. Mostly kindergarten level trolling and psychological projection.
-
I dunno. Half the active members here are not American, and those that are, are not Anarchists or Libertarians.
Net result......
...he just pwned himself. :thumbup: Good job
Uh, sorry. Your argument partially fails. I was a registered Libertarian for 25 years until I got tired of everyone knowing how I voted. Now I'm registered as Independent, so they still know how I vote, but they can't prove it.
-
Wow, the things you never knew about people.
I'd be libertarian if I weren't independent.
-
Okay, I'm my usual confused self.
chibi = Tressa_Barron (not Theresa Brown) = ? = ? = Al Gore
When did Al Gore become a member?
-
:include:
Wow, the things you never knew about people.
I'd be libertarian if I weren't independent.
Well, I was more than a modern monarch. Although I was not the model of a modern major general.
-
You probably are capable of intelligent discourse if you cared to bother.
Tis true. But unfortunately there is so little of that here @ I^2 these days. Mostly kindergarten level trolling and psychological projection.
Sure there is, that YOU spend half your posts talking about anal sex and the other half of your post either projecting or trolling , is nothing to do with the site or its members.
-
Okay, I'm my usual confused self.
chibi = Tressa_Barron (not Theresa Brown) = ? = ? = Al Gore
When did Al Gore become a member?
No, I am not Al Gore(not my SN).
My real name is Anton and the 1st initial of my surname starts with F. I choose the SN "Tressa_Barron" because the REAL Tressa_Barron tried to impersonate me with a sockpuppet whose SN is "Anton_F". S/He goes by the SN "SillySmartie" on Okcupid.
-
Hint: if you have to explain, you have failed.
-
You probably are capable of intelligent discourse if you cared to bother.
Tis true. But unfortunately there is so little of that here @ I^2 these days. Mostly kindergarten level trolling and psychological projection.
Ever heard the phrase, "pissing in our ocean of piss"? ;)
-
Somalia isn't an anarchy, because they don't have equality. In an anarchy everyone is totally equal.
The Somalia "example" is a very lame one.
-
Somalia isn't much of anything.
-
Would've loved to debated this fuckwit.
-
Would've loved to debated this fuckwit.
Am I chopped liver?
-
Would've loved to debated this fuckwit.
Am I chopped liver?
Did you mean to post this as GG?? :zoinks:
-
No. You had my attention in the closed circuit television thread.
-
I keep reading this thread title as "Dear librarians and anarchists." :tard:
-
I keep reading this thread title as "Dear librarians and anarchists." :tard:
Dear librarians and acupuncturists. :zoinks:
-
I keep reading this thread title as "Dear librarians and anarchists." :tard:
Dear librarians and acupuncturists. :zoinks:
Dear librarians and antichrists.