INTENSITY²

Arena for the Competitive => Main Event Callouts => Topic started by: P7PSP on February 17, 2011, 05:52:14 AM

Title: The Eclair versus eris callout.
Post by: P7PSP on February 17, 2011, 05:52:14 AM
While we all hate to have women get decked out in skimpy French maid outfits and wrestle sometimes it is inevitable.
http://www.intensitysquared.com/index.php/topic,3671.2550/topicseen.html (http://www.intensitysquared.com/index.php/topic,3671.2550/topicseen.html) Replies 2556 to 2558.
Title: Re: The Eclair versus eris callout.
Post by: eris on February 17, 2011, 06:01:55 AM
well, my first callout thread. I'll try not to disappoint.


I don't see a problem really, I'm not "mad" at her, I just wanted to ask her why it seems like she acts superior sometimes. I guess I should address her.




Eclair. I want to ask you a question. Why do all of your stabs at people seem to be about a question of personal worth ? I have no issue with your attitude, it is refreshing to see someone with a sharp tongue, but it seems so "morality" based. Is this just you being domme ? I really want to know. You have taken a few jabs at me in the past, refering to my own moral standings

And also, it seems like it is almost under your breath sometimes, like a little jab , to see if someone is listening. I think it is much more productive to come out and say what you feel.
Title: Re: The Eclair versus eris callout.
Post by: Eclair on February 17, 2011, 06:07:20 AM
well, my first callout thread. I'll try not to disappoint.


I don't see a problem really, I'm not "mad" at her, I just wanted to ask her why it seems like she acts superior sometimes. I guess I should address her.




Eclair. I want to ask you a question. Why do all of your stabs at people seem to be about a question of personal worth ? I have no issue with your attitude, it is refreshing to see someone with a sharp tongue, but it seems so "morality" based. Is this just you being domme ? I really want to know. You have taken a few jabs at me in the past, refering to my own moral standings

And also, it seems like it is almost under your breath sometimes, like a little jab , to see if someone is listening. I think it is much more productive to come out and say what you feel.

I do say what I feel. I don't see any reason to suppress that here. I doubt I should have to measure my posts here. They are what they are. Why you suddenly have a problem with it, really is not my problem.

Title: Re: The Eclair versus eris callout.
Post by: eris on February 17, 2011, 06:20:50 AM
No, it's not your problem I guess, and I don't really have a problem with you, but you're not answering the question



why is your personal morality superior to others, and why should we all live by your standards?




and to update, here is what happened in the other thread


well, I guess I could go on and dig up some examples, and I will if I must,  but I am sure you know what I mean

You do seem to have a lot of posts where you are chatting with friends and seems like a sweet girl, but other times it's obvious. really. I can remember when I first joined the site and you didn't even believe I was genuine with my words before you even got to talk to me. That is water under the bridge, it obviously didn't effect me I just wonder WHY you are this way.

It seems like the only things that stir your fiery tongue in you is when people are doing something you are somehow opposed to or dont agree with. To be a strong person is one thing, to be a dominant woman is one thing... but only to comment on what you seem to be weaknesses in others does not exude confidence.

If you really honestly do not think that others who live outside of society or do not live up to your standards are not worth respect, please, prove me wrong.

I'd suggest you back up your words with some kind of example, or leave it as it is. Or, are you stoned and bored and want to play online pretend dominance and brag to your Collarme boys?







 :laugh:



see that is what I mean !

right there !

lol

getting stoned, chatting about sex

these things are " beneath you "




I think any member here that is familiar with me knows I'm quite open about sex. I hate drugs. I always have, and I always will. To me they show a weakness, that no amount of beating on the chest of "I am so dominant" can extinguish. To me it shows loss of control and far from dominant behaviour. A person who is in control of their life, their actions etc is one I can respect.

That's not to say everyone isn't on their own journey, but I will never, and I mean never, respect someone for drug use and it conveys weakness to me. End of story.


you're proving my point, love

so, you're in control of yourself, people who smoke pot are not   ::)

I MUST be a weak person, unable to control my life,  and not really be a domme if I smoke pot, 'cause that is "weak"


Title: Re: The Eclair versus eris callout.
Post by: Eclair on February 17, 2011, 06:31:46 AM
No, it's not your problem I guess, and I don't really have a problem with you, but you're not answering the question



why is your personal morality superior to others, and why should we all live by your standards?





Why does my own personal opinion bother you so much, is the more interesting question.
Title: Re: The Eclair versus eris callout.
Post by: eris on February 17, 2011, 06:39:01 AM
ooh, quick change up, reverse psychology !  Im a pothead so I must fall for it, right ?  :thumbdn:


bothered ? ehh, not really. I aint mad at ya, I just think that you're trying to cover up some insecurity or something.

I didn't start the callout thread, but I will stay and talk about the situation and not get butthurt and change the subject.

It just seems like an insecure way to live - priding yourself on the fact that other people are weak and below you because they choose to live to different standards.
Title: Re: The Eclair versus eris callout.
Post by: Eclair on February 17, 2011, 06:49:13 AM
ooh, quick change up, reverse psychology !  Im a pothead so I must fall for it, right ?  :thumbdn:


bothered ? ehh, not really. I aint mad at ya, I just think that you're trying to cover up some insecurity or something.

I didn't start the callout thread, but I will stay and talk about the situation and not get butthurt and change the subject.

It just seems like an insecure way to live - priding yourself on the fact that other people are weak and below you because they choose to live to different standards.

No, I actually hope people live the best lives they can Eris, nothing more, nothing less. If you want to construe it into something other than it is, then perhaps you haven't been here long enough to understand the person I am.

As for drugs. There are people on this site that I do care very much about who use them, I don't think I need to explain myself to you about that. If you feel offended by my opinions, or you think somehow I am insecure...well, you are entitled to think that. I'm not going to play out my reasons for feeling pretty content about my journey so far....if you think that comes across as over confidence, then again, I can't help you. That is your perception. Maybe as you begin to master and learn things in your own life, you will actually understand the meaning of your own statements such as people 'choose to live different standards', rather than just shooting them off the cuff.


Title: Re: The Eclair versus eris callout.
Post by: eris on February 17, 2011, 07:11:29 AM
Maybe as you begin to master and learn things in your own life, you will actually understand the meaning of your own statements such as people 'choose to live different standards', rather than just shooting them off the cuff.
.


riiiiight, I need to " learn to master and learn things in my own life" ...... that doesn't sound like you have a superiority complex at all.  ::) And people *do* choose to live to different standards, that is no ones perception. My issue is that you seem intolerant of others standards.  Perhaps you may want to reword.

I guess I could say you don't know me either, and have no idea how Ive managed to "master and control my own life".  But that really wouldn't be worth it, right ? Cause them I'm being defensive.

Or I could say something like you snap to judge others you do not know based on what you consider to be a personalty weakness, but the I just don;t know what I'm talking about because then I'm just too inexperienced or immature to know what I am talking about, huh ?





This is going in circles, to me it seems that I am saying you're acting superior, and you're responding by saying I'm not perceptive enough or mature enough to understand your intentions. 

Or maybe now it will resort back to personal attacks about how I am not truly a dominant women, or that i am weak because I smoke pot ? I must be imagining this though, because you said you have friends that do such. Does this mean you think your friends are weak ? That's not a nice thing to think about friends.


I don't want to argue with you, not really, It doesn't really concern me that much. But I just want you to know- I think you're annoying :)

Title: Re: The Eclair versus eris callout.
Post by: eris on February 17, 2011, 07:29:22 AM
and that's real cute about how you're talking the "high road" in THIS thread, yet continuing with your lip in the other thread. We are both online right now, this is a real time discussion... can we keep this in one place ? Or do you want to act one way in one thread and another way in this one ?




I think the post below is the one that pissed you off. As you will know, drug taking is generally not recommended whilst 'playing'. If the below post pissed you off so much, that you felt the need to have a go at me rather than 'back up' why being stoned is the way to play, then it really reflects on you, not me. I suggest you run along if the below post by me is all it takes to annoy you, rather than back up your stance on drugged BDSM play.




well that is why I decided to say something to you at this moment, but not why you annoy me

Ive said over and over - my issue is that you believe you are superior. You can continue to drag other personal issues into it instead of actually talking about the issue,  doesnt bother me.

saying that " drugged bdsm play is not reccomended" is just another example of why you think you're superior, and you thinking I need to *explain* myself about a moral issues is my WHOLE problem with you



my stance on "drugged" BDSM play ?

 is that I smoke 2 joints in the morning, and I smoke 2 joints at night, and I smoke 2 joints in the afternoon cause they make me feel alright  :thumbup:

sorry that doest meet your standards :)





Title: Re: The Eclair versus eris callout.
Post by: Eclair on February 17, 2011, 07:43:37 AM
and that's real cute about how you're talking the "high road" in THIS thread, yet continuing with your lip in the other thread. We are both online right now, this is a real time discussion... can we keep this in one place ? Or do you want to act one way in one thread and another way in this one ?




I think the post below is the one that pissed you off. As you will know, drug taking is generally not recommended whilst 'playing'. If the below post pissed you off so much, that you felt the need to have a go at me rather than 'back up' why being stoned is the way to play, then it really reflects on you, not me. I suggest you run along if the below post by me is all it takes to annoy you, rather than back up your stance on drugged BDSM play.




well that is why I decided to say something to you at this moment, but not why you annoy me

Ive said over and over - my issue is that you believe you are superior. You can continue to drag other personal issues into it instead of actually talking about the issue,  doesnt bother me.

saying that " drugged bdsm play is not reccomended" is just another example of why you think you're superior, and you thinking I need to *explain* myself about a moral issues is my WHOLE problem with you



my stance on "drugged" BDSM play ?

 is that I smoke 2 joints in the morning, and I smoke 2 joints at night, and I smoke 2 joints in the afternoon cause they make me feel alright  :thumbup:

sorry that doest meet your standards :)







There's nothing to answer. You are arguing with yourself eris.

Title: Re: The Eclair versus eris callout.
Post by: eris on February 17, 2011, 07:54:46 AM
yes, im arguing with myself.

in this thread

Need I remind you, this is a concurrent conversation we are having ? Why are you taking the "high road" here and arguing with me over there ?

This is a real time converation we are having, not replying to each other at random.




So, if I have a comment that differs to someone else, I automatically *think* I am superior? That's an odd thing to say.

To be honest, as I said, it seems your insecurity about how much you use has caused you to take on some kind of stance against me. If you really honestly thought it was not such a big deal, and quite acceptable and you in fact were confident and happy with your drug use, I doubt you would have said anything to me or have been annoyed by what I said.



lol

so, you're sayiing I secretly think I'm a drug addict and you "showing me the way" caused me to have some sort of butthurt reaction ?


naaa, you're not projecting at all  !!!




And if I feel like saying something to you I will say it. Im not going to keep an opinion to myself because you don't think it is an approptiate time to make it. Confronting you does not mean you've upset me, only that I want to call you out cause I think you're acting like a jerk.  

I made one statement and now I'm 'showing you the way'. Spare me, and run along. You are making a fool of yourself.


right, cause im a pothead fool that needs to learn how to control and master my life  ::)




Your replies to my claims that you feel superior to others, is that you feel superior to others. I dont think we have anything else to talk about.
Title: Re: The Eclair versus eris callout.
Post by: ZEGH8578 on February 17, 2011, 11:52:59 AM
hehehehe :D
Title: Re: The Eclair versus eris callout.
Post by: RageBeoulve on February 17, 2011, 11:53:55 AM
hehehehe :D

Yep.  ;)
Title: Re: The Eclair versus eris callout.
Post by: Squidusa on February 17, 2011, 12:31:33 PM
hehehehe :D

Yep.  ;)

Lol , why are catfights so amusing to straight guys? <- potential thread?
Title: Re: The Eclair versus eris callout.
Post by: RageBeoulve on February 17, 2011, 12:38:04 PM
Dunno.  :laugh:
Title: Re: The Eclair versus eris callout.
Post by: "couldbecousin" on February 17, 2011, 12:40:20 PM
hehehehe :D

Yep.  ;)

Lol , why are catfights so amusing to straight guys? <- potential thread?

If you build it, they will post.  ;)
Title: Re: The Eclair versus eris callout.
Post by: Squidusa on February 17, 2011, 01:09:55 PM
hehehehe :D

Yep.  ;)

Lol , why are catfights so amusing to straight guys? <- potential thread?

If you build it, they will post.  ;)



yup , so heres the thread http://www.intensitysquared.com/index.php/topic,16710.0.html  ;)
Title: Re: The Eclair versus eris callout.
Post by: "couldbecousin" on February 17, 2011, 01:27:55 PM
hehehehe :D

Yep.  ;)

Lol , why are catfights so amusing to straight guys? <- potential thread?

If you build it, they will post.  ;)



yup , so heres the thread http://www.intensitysquared.com/index.php/topic,16710.0.html  ;)

Et voila!   Many replies have appeared!   :toporly:
Title: Re: The Eclair versus eris callout.
Post by: eris on February 17, 2011, 01:29:19 PM
BTW, why is Eclairs name capitalized and mine isnt ?

hmm ?

 :LOL:
Title: Re: The Eclair versus eris callout.
Post by: P7PSP on February 17, 2011, 01:31:48 PM
BTW, why is Eclairs name capitalized and mine isnt ?

hmm ?

 :LOL:
I'll never tell.  :LOL:
Title: Re: The Eclair versus eris callout.
Post by: eris on February 17, 2011, 01:33:15 PM
 :squiddy: :dom: :whipped:
Title: Re: The Eclair versus eris callout.
Post by: "couldbecousin" on February 17, 2011, 01:34:05 PM
BTW, why is Eclairs name capitalized and mine isnt ?

hmm ?

 :LOL:
I'll never tell.  :LOL:

*blabs*   Because she uses a capital E and you don't!
The spelling in the thread title is faithful to your respective username spellings!   :2thumbsup:
Title: Re: The Eclair versus eris callout.
Post by: P7PSP on February 17, 2011, 01:37:57 PM
BTW, why is Eclairs name capitalized and mine isnt ?

hmm ?

 :LOL:
I'll never tell.  :LOL:

*blabs*   Because she uses a capital E and you don't!
The spelling in the thread title is faithful to your respective username spellings!   :2thumbsup:
Uh, yeah, thanks for saving me.  :-\
Title: Re: The Eclair versus eris callout.
Post by: "couldbecousin" on February 17, 2011, 01:39:17 PM
BTW, why is Eclairs name capitalized and mine isnt ?

hmm ?

 :LOL:
I'll never tell.  :LOL:

*blabs*   Because she uses a capital E and you don't!
The spelling in the thread title is faithful to your respective username spellings!   :2thumbsup:
Uh, yeah, thanks for saving me.  :-\

What were you hoping to achieve by being mysterious?  :P
Title: Re: The Eclair versus eris callout.
Post by: eris on February 22, 2011, 03:17:27 AM
to keep everything straight, a completly worthless update


Don't care much for third person talk, so will say this directly to you, eris. When you first joined, I had you pegged as a troll; not many people talk about fucking the dead in their introduction thread. Later, I pegged you as one of those girls who has a need to be titillating in the presence of men. Everyone knows the type; the one that will never know how to be truly 'just friends' with a male. However, I'm quite aware of my own trouble with liking other females in general. These things take time with me. Now, I don't peg you as anything; don't know and don't really care. Your presence here has become a part of my routine, and I'm okay with that. Outside of some TMI for my personal taste, you seem fine just different from me. Maybe the two of you only need time to become desinsitized to each other.


Re-read this thread and noticed you addressed me directly so I thought I should at least answer it.

I'm not really looking to argue with anyone, it wasn't my idea to start these threads although I do admit I provoked her and "started it". That may not have been the most mature thing to do. It's not going to be a problem in the future.

I can see how people thought I was a troll, and the truth is I didn't care if I was not accepted. I'm an open person and I don't have to hide on the internet. Unless it is really obvious that I am joking, everything I have said about myself here is true.  I never really try to fit in on the internet - If I make friends somewhere I stick around and I have grown to really like intensity and all of the members. I can truly say that no one but Eclair has ever really annoyed me and I've gotten to know some really great people. But I don't really want to chitchat about the weather. I can see how my bluntness is boring to some and disgusting to others, but that's just the way I am. I've had issues with females all of my life because of me bein' so sexified and everything. But that is really not what happened here. I guess we just don't get each other. But I really do have more to offer than just my dirty mouth. I guess I'll have to prove that in time.

Don't care much for third person talk, so will say this directly to you, eris. When you first joined, I had you pegged as a troll; not many people talk about fucking the dead in their introduction thread. Later, I pegged you as one of those girls who has a need to be titillating in the presence of men. Everyone knows the type; the one that will never know how to be truly 'just friends' with a male. However, I'm quite aware of my own trouble with liking other females in general. These things take time with me. Now, I don't peg you as anything; don't know and don't really care. Your presence here has become a part of my routine, and I'm okay with that. Outside of some TMI for my personal taste, you seem fine just different from me. Maybe the two of you only need time to become desinsitized to each other.


Re-read this thread and noticed you addressed me directly so I thought I should at least answer it.

I'm not really looking to argue with anyone, it wasn't my idea to start these threads although I do admit I provoked her and "started it". That may not have been the most mature thing to do. It's not going to be a problem in the future.

I can see how people thought I was a troll, and the truth is I didn't care if I was not accepted. I'm an open person and I don't have to hide on the internet. Unless it is really obvious that I am joking, everything I have said about myself here is true.  I never really try to fit in on the internet - If I make friends somewhere I stick around and I have grown to really like intensity and all of the members. I can truly say that no one but Eclair has ever really annoyed me and I've gotten to know some really great people. But I don't really want to chitchat about the weather. I can see how my bluntness is boring to some and disgusting to others, but that's just the way I am. I've had issues with females all of my life because of me bein' so sexified and everything. But that is really not what happened here. I guess we just don't get each other. But I really do have more to offer than just my dirty mouth. I guess I'll have to prove that in time.

Correction, you tried to provoke me? What irked you was you don’t have the power to provoke me sweetness....despite your taking it across several threads, threw a tantrum when I didn’t answer your last comment because I was logging off at 12.45am my time...then, you sweetness, disappeared for a few days...should we just hold off this discussion because it’s all about you and your defensiveness about your drug use? But somehow, I am ‘the Bitch’....of course...blame away.
I simply asked how drugs played into your bdsm play, since it’s all you really talk about here, it’s your topic of interest. So, as much as you would like to say ‘I’m really not looking to argue with anyone’...well, no, of course you aren’t. You’ve already spewed out you don’t like me...etc etc...all this because someone asked about your bdsm drug use and how that works for you.

I have no doubts you will now play 'victim' that you were picked on, and you are damn lucky I can't be assed to pull your pathetic rantings from that night up and rehash them here.

I suggest you don't bother me again, or if you do, back yourself up instead of twisting what I say, posting it across several threads then slinking away for days, but calling me out for not answering because I logged off late at night.

And when you answer, can you not be spliffed up on dope? Kind of lacks credibility.






well I tried to get you to argue with me, and it worked.  :thumbup: And, again,  Im not the one who started the threads. But I am certainly no victim. I even admitted it was immature of me to insult you out of the blue the way I did.

So, I'm not really hiding. I let it go because it seemed like you were done arguing and you didn't bring this back up until now.  Although you did a great job of acting a certain way in some threads and completely different in others. As for dissapearing for a few days, well I do have a job and a life outside of this place, but I never backed down.

BDSM is my topic of interest because it is my topic of life. This is who I am. And I smoke marijuana regularly, and I see it as a positive relaxing experience and it only enhances anything I do, including playing.

You do still have that holier than thou kick goin on though. The discussion was never about my drug use, it was about how you annoy me because you act superior. You try to make it about my drug use though, and we can talk about it if you want. But my issue is that you act morally superior to , well, just about everyone.

I mean, why should it matter to you if I smoke a joint before I get laid ? Is my moral turpitude destroying the youth or something ? I swear, they were all over 18  ;)
Title: Re: The Eclair versus eris callout.
Post by: Eclair on February 22, 2011, 04:05:10 AM
As I said, you were the one crying 'ignored' when I logged off.

Either way, you missed the intent of the original question which was around whether you used drugs to 'enhance' your BDSM experiences or, alternatively, were they part of your lifestyle, like an addiction.

I think you've answered the question.

If you can't answer general enquiries about your fetish without getting all defensive (I seem to remember originally, you were bothered about being viewed as a 'slut'), then, as I say, that is your own problem and lack of confidence in your own choices.

If you choose to 'deflect' that on me as being 'holier than thou' or superior, or whatever spew against me has come out of your mouth, then so be it.

As I said, methinks you do protest to much.

Now eeris, can you, leave it at that if you have nothing to back yourself up other than to say you don't like me? You've already sprouted your thoughts on me...if you think there's any more to achieve by going on, then please do, otherwise, I'd suggest unless you can specify what exactly I should address, other than you don't like me (well, guess what...it's an online forum, not a popularity contest at high school), then you are going to bore a lot of people pretty quickly with your little tantrum.


Title: Re: The Eclair versus eris callout.
Post by: eris on February 22, 2011, 04:27:00 AM
yeah, really all I ever had to say was that I didn't like you. Not much else to say. I'm only replying to YOUR comments.



I am not sensitive about my fetishes, and I'll talk allllll day about them. You didn't ask me about my fetishes, you implied I was addicted to drugs. I'm not sorry for confronting you about that comment.


and the conversation you are talking about ( me being slutty and all) was an argument you and I had - because I did something that you thought was morally wrong :( and my answer to it was that I fuck around a lot. See what I mean ? Me not liking you isn't because you implied I was a drug addict. You've been annoying me for months.

what exactly am I supposed to "back myself up with " ?

I don't like you, I think you think you're hot shit. Nothing to "back that up with" really.

You continue to suggest I should explain my "worthiness" or something , but you are the only one who cares about such things as status.

ask me specific questions, about anything, and I will answer you.
Title: Re: The Eclair versus eris callout.
Post by: eris on February 22, 2011, 06:40:56 AM
Don't care much for third person talk, so will say this directly to you, eris. When you first joined, I had you pegged as a troll; not many people talk about fucking the dead in their introduction thread. Later, I pegged you as one of those girls who has a need to be titillating in the presence of men. Everyone knows the type; the one that will never know how to be truly 'just friends' with a male. However, I'm quite aware of my own trouble with liking other females in general. These things take time with me. Now, I don't peg you as anything; don't know and don't really care. Your presence here has become a part of my routine, and I'm okay with that. Outside of some TMI for my personal taste, you seem fine just different from me. Maybe the two of you only need time to become desinsitized to each other.


Re-read this thread and noticed you addressed me directly so I thought I should at least answer it.

I'm not really looking to argue with anyone, it wasn't my idea to start these threads although I do admit I provoked her and "started it". That may not have been the most mature thing to do. It's not going to be a problem in the future.

I can see how people thought I was a troll, and the truth is I didn't care if I was not accepted. I'm an open person and I don't have to hide on the internet. Unless it is really obvious that I am joking, everything I have said about myself here is true.  I never really try to fit in on the internet - If I make friends somewhere I stick around and I have grown to really like intensity and all of the members. I can truly say that no one but Eclair has ever really annoyed me and I've gotten to know some really great people. But I don't really want to chitchat about the weather. I can see how my bluntness is boring to some and disgusting to others, but that's just the way I am. I've had issues with females all of my life because of me bein' so sexified and everything. But that is really not what happened here. I guess we just don't get each other. But I really do have more to offer than just my dirty mouth. I guess I'll have to prove that in time.

Don't care much for third person talk, so will say this directly to you, eris. When you first joined, I had you pegged as a troll; not many people talk about fucking the dead in their introduction thread. Later, I pegged you as one of those girls who has a need to be titillating in the presence of men. Everyone knows the type; the one that will never know how to be truly 'just friends' with a male. However, I'm quite aware of my own trouble with liking other females in general. These things take time with me. Now, I don't peg you as anything; don't know and don't really care. Your presence here has become a part of my routine, and I'm okay with that. Outside of some TMI for my personal taste, you seem fine just different from me. Maybe the two of you only need time to become desinsitized to each other.


Re-read this thread and noticed you addressed me directly so I thought I should at least answer it.

I'm not really looking to argue with anyone, it wasn't my idea to start these threads although I do admit I provoked her and "started it". That may not have been the most mature thing to do. It's not going to be a problem in the future.

I can see how people thought I was a troll, and the truth is I didn't care if I was not accepted. I'm an open person and I don't have to hide on the internet. Unless it is really obvious that I am joking, everything I have said about myself here is true.  I never really try to fit in on the internet - If I make friends somewhere I stick around and I have grown to really like intensity and all of the members. I can truly say that no one but Eclair has ever really annoyed me and I've gotten to know some really great people. But I don't really want to chitchat about the weather. I can see how my bluntness is boring to some and disgusting to others, but that's just the way I am. I've had issues with females all of my life because of me bein' so sexified and everything. But that is really not what happened here. I guess we just don't get each other. But I really do have more to offer than just my dirty mouth. I guess I'll have to prove that in time.

Correction, you tried to provoke me? What irked you was you don’t have the power to provoke me sweetness....despite your taking it across several threads, threw a tantrum when I didn’t answer your last comment because I was logging off at 12.45am my time...then, you sweetness, disappeared for a few days...should we just hold off this discussion because it’s all about you and your defensiveness about your drug use? But somehow, I am ‘the Bitch’....of course...blame away.
I simply asked how drugs played into your bdsm play, since it’s all you really talk about here, it’s your topic of interest. So, as much as you would like to say ‘I’m really not looking to argue with anyone’...well, no, of course you aren’t. You’ve already spewed out you don’t like me...etc etc...all this because someone asked about your bdsm drug use and how that works for you.

I have no doubts you will now play 'victim' that you were picked on, and you are damn lucky I can't be assed to pull your pathetic rantings from that night up and rehash them here.

I suggest you don't bother me again, or if you do, back yourself up instead of twisting what I say, posting it across several threads then slinking away for days, but calling me out for not answering because I logged off late at night.

And when you answer, can you not be spliffed up on dope? Kind of lacks credibility.






well I tried to get you to argue with me, and it worked.  :thumbup:

Well, now at least you admit the high school approach you had. It was a deliberate attempt...and when it failed, because I asked you to back yourself up, and that I wasn't here to please you, you had a cry about it, and plead that I was ignoring you.

Go have your stupid little power plays somewhere else eeris, and get a grip. Seriously.

Is that English ?



well I deliberately tried to get you to talk to me about this issue. You're the one that seems so upset  :laugh:

back myself up with what !!!  lol. I DONT LIKE YOU, that is all.



As I said, you were the one crying about being ignored. But time and again, nothing.

You can try to deflect with your condescending 'Is that English' comments and similar. That's fine.

Seems that when you were met head on, you had nothing, except a little puff of nothing. "you don't like me"...well who really gives a shit.

I'm not here to be liked, but that obviously means a lot to you based on your measurement of yourself of what online popularity means on other sites such as Collarme...you seemed quite excited about it.

What you can't deal with is your own perception of yourself and someone asked you a simple question about your BDSM activities and drugs, and all this because of your little tantrum. One minute you complain you aren't being answered, then when you get challenged head to head, you can't meet it because you are too weak to back yourself up except for bullshitty highschool trash like "Speak English"...

Really, if you think getting drugged and fucking guys off the internet and picking fights with anonymous chicks on the internet is all it takes to be a real woman, you are sadly mistaken.


Well, if it's a simple case of you not liking me, why exactly is that my problem?

No, you see, it's not my problem, as I've said a hundred times. It's yours.

Your other problem seems to be that I think I'm 'hot shit' to use your words.

So what eeris? I mean, really, how does that take *away* from you? You're not the first person to say it, and you won't be the last. I really don't care. If you have problems with your self esteem, and self worth, then I can only hope you get over it and wish you all the best with your life, regardless of whether you like me or not.



why is it your problem ? I dunno, why does it seem to upset you so much ?


I can see you brought my self worth into it again, cause it always is that way with you ... I must feel below you and have poor self esteem because of my  "lack of something or other " :(


I can truly say a lot of the older Dommes are similar to you in this aspect though, so maybe you are just old school or something. Sissy boys like the "im better than you routine."


I'll be happy to explain any of my fetishes though, or my drug use. I'll even go into further detail about why I don't like you but that seems a bit futile at this stage.  I'll even talk about meeting boys off the internet.

I have nothing to hide or be ashamed of, and I'll answer any question anyone has for me about myself or about this argument.


GTFO of the peanut gallery you two.
yeah, this is getting lame  :thumbdn:




circles  :facepalm2:


If there is anything NEW to discuss, we can move it over to the main event. But I don't think there is much else to say really - we are just talking at each other at this point.



Somehow I think this could be a never ending story, with some breaks.

Doms revisited or something would be an appropriate title then.

Yes, I agree, and I'm really bored of it all.

I never meant for all this mess to happen, but , meh, whatever.


we just keep repeating the same things to each other.  no matter how many times we repeat ourselves we are not going to convince each other of anything.






So, goodbye Eclair, let's hope we can avoid each other like adults from now on ?



Title: Re: The Eclair versus eris callout.
Post by: eris on February 22, 2011, 08:21:09 AM


So, as per the above, you were told to run along days ago.

Now you have chosen to come back and rehash it when it suits you because you 'don't like someone'....then, after a few rambling posts, at your whim, it's suddenly finished again? One minute I'm not answering you, then the next minute you're twisting it around.

It already was over eeris. And you rambling on when I logged off 'that I wouldn't answer you' or 'oh, she won't talk to me', then you come back days later on another tangent. Why don't you focus on what you know best rather than to start arguments because you don't like someone. No one gives a shit. Seriously, they don't.

I'm not answering in your 50 different 'Whine about Eclair' threads, the whole thing was over days ago.
yeah, it was over days ago, but you keep bumping the threads huh  :laugh:



you're the one who wont keep it to one thread, I even try to repost everything in the main callout thread trying to keep it all straight.

We aren't saying anything new to each other. Im sorry I hurt your feelings, Eclair :(  Hope you can get over it.

till then  ? unless you have something new to say.... I'm bored with this.

Title: Re: The Eclair versus eris callout.
Post by: Frolic_Fun on February 22, 2011, 09:55:03 AM
There has been a recent callout between her and les over her "morality". She didn't like the fact that les (and most people of i2) did not agree with her on pandering to pregnant women who act like complete cunts. There has been various other disagreements on various threads, mainly due to her PC nature on various topics such as implying that you should not be allowed to be a straight person or have your own sexual preferences, as that's deemed discriminating.

The funniest one was when she implied that I am homophobic because I don't like GA's transistion. I fail to see the connection there (since one can be STRAIGHT when transistioning), but it did give me a good chuckle. :laugh:
Title: Re: The Eclair versus eris callout.
Post by: Scrapheap on February 22, 2011, 07:56:16 PM
.... I hate drugs. I always have, and I always will. To me they show a weakness, that no amount of beating on the chest of "I am so dominant" can extinguish. To me it shows loss of control and far from dominant behaviour. A person who is in control of their life, their actions etc is one I can respect.

You've obviously conflated drug use and enjoyment with drug addiction.

Not to mention the fact that if you drink alcohol, or have ever used prescription drugs, you're being a huge hypocrite here.

I smoke pot for the same reason that I drink alcohol. I like the feeling it gives me. After a hard day's work, I like to get fucked up, it makes life more enjoyable. Not to mention that pot helps me with stomach/nausea issues. If I get really drunk at a party, I can't go to sleep because I will get the spins and throw up. I've also throw up in my sleep on 2 occasions. Smoking a joint prevents that. I don't have to worry about choking to death in my own vomit.

Now how can you claim that I'm "not in control" of my life, and that I'm showing weakness by ingesting intoxicating substances?? I'm not addicted to either, I'm not being irresponsible, I don't use either in excess to endanger my health, etc, etc, etc.

Quote
That's not to say everyone isn't on their own journey, but I will never, and I mean never, respect someone for drug use and it conveys weakness to me. End of story.

In other words, you can't defend that statement.  ::)
Title: Re: The Eclair versus eris callout.
Post by: eris on February 23, 2011, 12:53:26 PM
I can see this REALLY pissed her off  :laugh:




 :yawn:

Ahh, you keep bumping threads Bitch Tits, as my daughters would say.

You cried about me logging off last week, please, if you are going to do a call out, do it properly, otherwise, take a long toke, feel sorry for yourself, and try to berate those who have tried their best in their lives....accuse them of being 'over confident' if you will.

Sorry, if I had better things to do in my thirties than to scour the internet for sex and play pretend Domme, when really I should have been trying to get my shit together...oops, did I say that...










wow, I REALLY pissed you off, huh

try to get over it


:)
Title: Re: The Eclair versus eris callout.
Post by: eris on February 23, 2011, 11:44:50 PM
I don't think arguing anymore will accomplish anything, we have each made our point.  It has obviously just got down to personal attacks and , to me, that is just not classy.

I'll keep posting it all here, though, to keep everything straight.

Believe it or not, I really don't like arguing on the internet.



Hope it was entertaining, boys  ;)





when really I should have been trying to get my shit together.
Always took it as a given that people who really have their shit together don't hang in places like this. No offense to the membership; just saying.

You are here, too.

I've said it before, I usually come here when I am stressed and need to relax. The by product of that is that I say things off the top of my head, and it amazes me that people who call me a subtle bitch, don't get the context that my thoughts come out a certain way.

I'd even bet that if I was a guy, half the things I said wouldn't be taken as 'bitchy'.

I don't have to measure my words here, and that is the beauty of the site...seriously, here's my perfect IRL example:

Me, meeting workfriends for dinner. See lovely girl from work, who I don't know very well, and she looks gorgeous, amazing in this beautiful top. Of course, in hindsight, the appropriate thing to have said was...'I love your top, you look great'.

No, I say, "I suppose you think you look hot in that top".

And in all honesty, I did not, seriously did not realise the way that it may have sounded to her. I mean, I was thinking 'wow, she should be thinking she's smoking hot in that top, because she is'.

Perfect example.

I just think instead of eeris focusing on internet people and not liking them because of something they said and continually stalking them, she should focus on getting her shit together than criticising me and actually showing herself to be the one who is bitchy for no reason. I am pretty happy with things I've done in my life,if me coming here to relax is an issue and risking hurting sensitive types like eeris, maybe she is focusing on the wrong thing, and should build her own self esteem was my point.




I just think instead of eeris focusing on internet people and not liking them because of something they said and continually stalking them, she should focus on getting her shit together




:rofl: