INTENSITY²

Politics, Mature and taboo => Political Pundits => Topic started by: Small Penis on June 20, 2009, 05:57:06 PM

Title: Young Children
Post by: Small Penis on June 20, 2009, 05:57:06 PM
Removed because it directly violates our TOS.

/Odeon
Title: Re: Young Children
Post by: RageBeoulve on June 20, 2009, 05:57:33 PM
Cool story, bro. :thumbup:
Title: Re: Young Children
Post by: Parts on June 20, 2009, 06:00:21 PM
Try not to be to repulsive will you
Title: Re: Young Children
Post by: RageBeoulve on June 20, 2009, 06:01:09 PM
Try not to be to repulsive will you

See what I mean, parts? He's a dumbass. :duh:
Title: Re: Young Children
Post by: Christopher McCandless on June 20, 2009, 06:48:00 PM
Aye.  :headbang2:
Title: Re: Young Children
Post by: Parts on June 20, 2009, 07:06:40 PM
Try not to be to repulsive will you

See what I mean, parts? He's a dumbass. :duh:

He seems to think he is pretty funny so I know he's not that bright.
Title: Re: Young Children
Post by: RageBeoulve on June 20, 2009, 07:11:05 PM
Try not to be to repulsive will you

See what I mean, parts? He's a dumbass. :duh:

He seems to think he is pretty funny so I know he's not that bright.

Yeah. Like I mean if he were to write fucked up stuff into a story with a funny ending or something..

But he doesn't. Its not funny at all. Its dumb. I wish he'd just fuck off.
Title: Re: Young Children
Post by: Parts on June 20, 2009, 07:15:53 PM
Nothing has been done yet that was really a banning offense.  Social skills classes could do him some good though.  I don't really understand what he gets out of all this
Title: Re: Young Children
Post by: RageBeoulve on June 20, 2009, 07:49:51 PM
Nothing has been done yet that was really a banning offense.  Social skills classes could do him some good though.  I don't really understand what he gets out of all this

I actually do, to a degree. I used to troll a ton of different sites. Especially things like second life.

I would have never trolled a board designed for use by autistic people. He isn't even good at it. Usually theres some degree of humor, or something smartassy. When he does it its just sad and tragic. Just a stupid fag.  :facepalm2:
Title: Re: Young Children
Post by: Natalia Evans on June 20, 2009, 07:56:58 PM
 :eh:
Title: Re: Young Children
Post by: RageBeoulve on June 20, 2009, 07:58:04 PM
:eh:

 :indeed:
Title: Re: Young Children
Post by: Parts on June 20, 2009, 08:00:08 PM
Yes there is trolling that's fun but this is pathetic
Title: Re: Young Children
Post by: earthboundmisfit on June 20, 2009, 10:07:20 PM


I actually do, to a degree. I used to troll a ton of different sites. Especially things like second life.

I would have never trolled a board designed for use by autistic people. He isn't even good at it. Usually theres some degree of humor, or something smartassy. When he does it its just sad and tragic. Just a stupid fag.  :facepalm2:



Our shenanigans are cheeky and fun... his shenanigans are cruel and tragic. Which makes them not shenanigans at all, really.



(http://thelostjacket.com/wp-content/uploads/2009/02/shenanigans.jpg)
Title: Re: Young Children
Post by: RageBeoulve on June 20, 2009, 10:13:51 PM


I actually do, to a degree. I used to troll a ton of different sites. Especially things like second life.

I would have never trolled a board designed for use by autistic people. He isn't even good at it. Usually theres some degree of humor, or something smartassy. When he does it its just sad and tragic. Just a stupid fag.  :facepalm2:



Our shenanigans are cheeky and fun... his shenanigans are cruel and tragic. Which makes them not shenanigans at all, really.



(http://thelostjacket.com/wp-content/uploads/2009/02/shenanigans.jpg)

 :green: You are one funny dude. You know that?  :plus:
Title: Re: Young Children
Post by: earthboundmisfit on June 20, 2009, 11:11:53 PM


Well, I never really had much in the way of looks, so I need to make up for it with personality. Chicks dig funny dudes.  :green:
Title: Re: Young Children
Post by: odeon on June 21, 2009, 05:13:26 AM
I'm pretty sure Amerikasend (or whatever his name these days is) is crossing the line re our TOS. I don't want this site targeted by either our host or a third party because a fuckwit attempts to be offensive, so this stops here, right now.

I've sent him a PM. The second time I need to do that I'll ban his sorry arse.
Title: Re: Young Children
Post by: RageBeoulve on June 21, 2009, 07:22:52 AM
I'm pretty sure Amerikasend (or whatever his name these days is) is crossing the line re our TOS. I don't want this site targeted by either our host or a third party because a fuckwit attempts to be offensive, so this stops here, right now.

I've sent him a PM. The second time I need to do that I'll ban his sorry arse.

Thanks man. That guy is a piece of shit anyway.
Title: Re: Young Children
Post by: odeon on June 21, 2009, 02:59:09 PM
I don't know what he's trying to achieve, really.
Title: Re: Young Children
Post by: Small Penis on June 21, 2009, 04:27:16 PM
nooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooo
oooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooo
oooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooo
Title: Re: Young Children
Post by: The_Chosen_One on June 22, 2009, 12:56:33 AM
I'm pretty sure Amerikasend (or whatever his name these days is) is crossing the line re our TOS. I don't want this site targeted by either our host or a third party because a fuckwit attempts to be offensive, so this stops here, right now.

I've sent him a PM. The second time I need to do that I'll ban his sorry arse.

Thanks man. That guy is a piece of shit anyway.

From what I've heard, all he was talking about was a cartoon (anime) of some deviant stuff. If he posted the thing, then remove it and tell him why. If it was a question about the aspect of it, what the fuck does it matter? Banning people for being fuckwits makes it seem like Quaterfag or MrMark has taken over. To me, the only legitimate banning recently was peaguy, and SP doesn't even come close to that. No one gives a shit at zOMG, let alone Soph, and he doesn't post porn or any shit to take down the site so why the drama here? Boredom does some fucking weird things to people, but whinging about them makes you wonder who is actually causing more trouble. Last year taught me that.
Title: Re: Young Children
Post by: odeon on June 22, 2009, 03:00:25 AM
It's not up to you, TCO. If he violates the TOS of this site again, he is out of here. End of story.
Title: Re: Young Children
Post by: The_Chosen_One on June 22, 2009, 03:29:13 AM
Seems a bit heavy handed to kick someone if they hadn't violated the TOS, and I'm taking parts' word on this. Also, I'm going on what was said over at zOMG, and if what he said is true, heavy handed would be an under-statement. Still, it's your site, and we are just the membership who keep it going......

Oh, and just one word of advice - just because you don't like the ethics or the membership of Soph's site doesn't give you the right to bag them without first checking them out.
Title: Re: Young Children
Post by: Eclair on June 22, 2009, 04:10:22 AM
Seems a bit heavy handed to kick someone if they hadn't violated the TOS, and I'm taking parts' word on this. Also, I'm going on what was said over at zOMG, and if what he said is true, heavy handed would be an under-statement. Still, it's your site, and we are just the membership who keep it going......Oh, and just one word of advice - just because you don't like the ethics or the membership of Soph's site doesn't give you the right to bag them without first checking them out.

Well, my friend, I am a member and I complained about the content of the thread.

And I'm sorry, if you find the topic interesting, too bad. That definitely is not what this site is for. And definitely happy to debate the issue, but I am appalled that the discussion about that sort of thing is something you feel is worth fighting for.

As for Odeon's slant on the TOS, not only are his points valid, specifically, they also state;

We reserve the right to refuse service to anyone. Any material that, in our judgment, is obscene, threatening, illegal, or violates our terms of service in any manner may be removed from our servers (or otherwise disabled), with or without notice.

Failure to respond to email from our abuse department within 48 hours may result in the suspension or termination of your services. All abuse issues must be dealt with via troubleticket/email and will have a response within 48 hours.

If in doubt regarding the acceptability of your site or service, please contact us at abuse@hostgator.com and we will be happy to assist you.

Potential harm to minors is strictly forbidden, including but not limited to child pornography or content perceived to be child pornography (Lolita):

Any site found to host child pornography or linking to child pornography will be suspended immediately without notice.



Therefore, TALKING about harm to minors, or content perceived to be child pornography, exposes the site to being shut down. Apart from being hideously offensive.

And yes, the laws the site are bound to are US laws....not the freehanded laws you and others wish to debate.

And debate away, but the TOS are clear.

Title: Re: Young Children
Post by: Blasted on June 22, 2009, 04:45:49 AM
Did he actually post child porn?  Images or videos?  I didn't see the original post.
Title: Re: Young Children
Post by: Eclair on June 22, 2009, 04:49:23 AM
Did he actually post child porn?  Images or videos?  I didn't see the original post.

He wanted people to recount stories, basically.
Title: Re: Young Children
Post by: odeon on June 22, 2009, 04:50:43 AM
Seems a bit heavy handed to kick someone if they hadn't violated the TOS, and I'm taking parts' word on this. Also, I'm going on what was said over at zOMG, and if what he said is true, heavy handed would be an under-statement. Still, it's your site, and we are just the membership who keep it going......

Oh, and just one word of advice - just because you don't like the ethics or the membership of Soph's site doesn't give you the right to bag them without first checking them out.

???

I have no problems with the ethics or the membership of Soph's site. Whatever gave you that idea? What I do have problems with are idiots that risk the entire site for weak-assed trolling. What Amerikasend posted was very clearly against our TOS, and since I'm the one paying the bills, it's up to me what to do.

Don't like that? Tough.
Title: Re: Young Children
Post by: odeon on June 22, 2009, 04:52:26 AM
Did he actually post child porn?  Images or videos?  I didn't see the original post.

He wanted people to recount stories, basically.

Which is bad enough since it encourages illegal activities.
Title: Re: Young Children
Post by: Blasted on June 22, 2009, 04:55:15 AM
I guess.  I highly doubt it was serious though and even more improbable is that anyone else on here would post memorable tit-bits about their paedophilic activities.

Still, TOS is TOS.
Title: Re: Young Children
Post by: The_Chosen_One on June 22, 2009, 04:56:24 AM
Seems a bit heavy handed to kick someone if they hadn't violated the TOS, and I'm taking parts' word on this. Also, I'm going on what was said over at zOMG, and if what he said is true, heavy handed would be an under-statement. Still, it's your site, and we are just the membership who keep it going......Oh, and just one word of advice - just because you don't like the ethics or the membership of Soph's site doesn't give you the right to bag them without first checking them out.

Well, my friend, I am a member and I complained about the content of the thread.

And I'm sorry, if you find the topic interesting, too bad. That definitely is not what this site is for. And definitely happy to debate the issue, but I am appalled that the discussion about that sort of thing is something you feel is worth fighting for.

As for Odeon's slant on the TOS, not only are his points valid, specifically, they also state;

We reserve the right to refuse service to anyone. Any material that, in our judgment, is obscene, threatening, illegal, or violates our terms of service in any manner may be removed from our servers (or otherwise disabled), with or without notice.

Failure to respond to email from our abuse department within 48 hours may result in the suspension or termination of your services. All abuse issues must be dealt with via troubleticket/email and will have a response within 48 hours.

If in doubt regarding the acceptability of your site or service, please contact us at abuse@hostgator.com and we will be happy to assist you.

Potential harm to minors is strictly forbidden, including but not limited to child pornography or content perceived to be child pornography (Lolita):

Any site found to host child pornography or linking to child pornography will be suspended immediately without notice.



Therefore, TALKING about harm to minors, or content perceived to be child pornography, exposes the site to being shut down. Apart from being hideously offensive.

And yes, the laws the site are bound to are US laws....not the freehanded laws you and others wish to debate.

And debate away, but the TOS are clear.



Personally I don't give a shit about the subject. It's the criticsm of the guy for merely discussing it that's abhorrent. If he posted pics of porn related material, then fair enough. Buty if it was just a rant or some shit about fucking kids (which was the subject of the anime - a robot fucking an 11 year old), then where is the problem? How much porn have others like TheoK and his ilk have put up on this site, only to have nothing done? Are they threatened with the ban stick because of it? buttcoffee may be a fucktard, and he may post a lot of crap, but as long as it doesn't directly fuck things up, then who gives a shit. I personally think porn is a wank, and don't bother with it, but aq discussion or question on an act can't be considered too fucking harmful.

It's a pity there aren't universal laws for things like the net, considering the US fucks everything it touches.

Fucking lighten up, for Christ's sake. no-one was advocating child porn at all anyway, and all your overreactions prove is that you can't see the forest for the trees.
Title: Re: Young Children
Post by: odeon on June 22, 2009, 04:58:13 AM
It doesn't matter if it's serious or not. What matters is what our host (and the groups that would push for the shutdown of I2, if they found out) think.

I'm not willing to risk the site for a troll.
Title: Re: Young Children
Post by: Blasted on June 22, 2009, 04:58:52 AM
Fair enough  ;)
Title: Re: Young Children
Post by: odeon on June 22, 2009, 04:59:06 AM
Seems a bit heavy handed to kick someone if they hadn't violated the TOS, and I'm taking parts' word on this. Also, I'm going on what was said over at zOMG, and if what he said is true, heavy handed would be an under-statement. Still, it's your site, and we are just the membership who keep it going......Oh, and just one word of advice - just because you don't like the ethics or the membership of Soph's site doesn't give you the right to bag them without first checking them out.

Well, my friend, I am a member and I complained about the content of the thread.

And I'm sorry, if you find the topic interesting, too bad. That definitely is not what this site is for. And definitely happy to debate the issue, but I am appalled that the discussion about that sort of thing is something you feel is worth fighting for.

As for Odeon's slant on the TOS, not only are his points valid, specifically, they also state;

We reserve the right to refuse service to anyone. Any material that, in our judgment, is obscene, threatening, illegal, or violates our terms of service in any manner may be removed from our servers (or otherwise disabled), with or without notice.

Failure to respond to email from our abuse department within 48 hours may result in the suspension or termination of your services. All abuse issues must be dealt with via troubleticket/email and will have a response within 48 hours.

If in doubt regarding the acceptability of your site or service, please contact us at abuse@hostgator.com and we will be happy to assist you.

Potential harm to minors is strictly forbidden, including but not limited to child pornography or content perceived to be child pornography (Lolita):

Any site found to host child pornography or linking to child pornography will be suspended immediately without notice.



Therefore, TALKING about harm to minors, or content perceived to be child pornography, exposes the site to being shut down. Apart from being hideously offensive.

And yes, the laws the site are bound to are US laws....not the freehanded laws you and others wish to debate.

And debate away, but the TOS are clear.



Personally I don't give a shit about the subject. It's the criticsm of the guy for merely discussing it that's abhorrent. If he posted pics of porn related material, then fair enough. Buty if it was just a rant or some shit about fucking kids (which was the subject of the anime - a robot fucking an 11 year old), then where is the problem? How much porn have others like TheoK and his ilk have put up on this site, only to have nothing done? Are they threatened with the ban stick because of it? buttcoffee may be a fucktard, and he may post a lot of crap, but as long as it doesn't directly fuck things up, then who gives a shit. I personally think porn is a wank, and don't bother with it, but aq discussion or question on an act can't be considered too fucking harmful.

It's a pity there aren't universal laws for things like the net, considering the US fucks everything it touches.

Fucking lighten up, for Christ's sake. no-one was advocating child porn at all anyway, and all your overreactions prove is that you can't see the forest for the trees.

Don't like it? Fuck off (and I mean it in the nicest possible way).
Title: Re: Young Children
Post by: The_Chosen_One on June 22, 2009, 05:28:31 AM
Unlike you, I don't give in that easily. I learnt when you got stuck in last year not to throw in the towel. I'll go when I decide to, and not before. I've not violated anything, so you fuck off (and here's a group hug :grouphug: to go with it) .
Title: Re: Young Children
Post by: Eclair on June 22, 2009, 05:56:09 AM
Seems a bit heavy handed to kick someone if they hadn't violated the TOS, and I'm taking parts' word on this. Also, I'm going on what was said over at zOMG, and if what he said is true, heavy handed would be an under-statement. Still, it's your site, and we are just the membership who keep it going......Oh, and just one word of advice - just because you don't like the ethics or the membership of Soph's site doesn't give you the right to bag them without first checking them out.

Well, my friend, I am a member and I complained about the content of the thread.

And I'm sorry, if you find the topic interesting, too bad. That definitely is not what this site is for. And definitely happy to debate the issue, but I am appalled that the discussion about that sort of thing is something you feel is worth fighting for.

As for Odeon's slant on the TOS, not only are his points valid, specifically, they also state;

We reserve the right to refuse service to anyone. Any material that, in our judgment, is obscene, threatening, illegal, or violates our terms of service in any manner may be removed from our servers (or otherwise disabled), with or without notice.

Failure to respond to email from our abuse department within 48 hours may result in the suspension or termination of your services. All abuse issues must be dealt with via troubleticket/email and will have a response within 48 hours.

If in doubt regarding the acceptability of your site or service, please contact us at abuse@hostgator.com and we will be happy to assist you.

Potential harm to minors is strictly forbidden, including but not limited to child pornography or content perceived to be child pornography (Lolita):

Any site found to host child pornography or linking to child pornography will be suspended immediately without notice.



Therefore, TALKING about harm to minors, or content perceived to be child pornography, exposes the site to being shut down. Apart from being hideously offensive.

And yes, the laws the site are bound to are US laws....not the freehanded laws you and others wish to debate.

And debate away, but the TOS are clear.



Personally I don't give a shit about the subject. It's the criticsm of the guy for merely discussing it that's abhorrent. If he posted pics of porn related material, then fair enough. Buty if it was just a rant or some shit about fucking kids (which was the subject of the anime - a robot fucking an 11 year old), then where is the problem? How much porn have others like TheoK and his ilk have put up on this site, only to have nothing done? Are they threatened with the ban stick because of it? buttcoffee may be a fucktard, and he may post a lot of crap, but as long as it doesn't directly fuck things up, then who gives a shit. I personally think porn is a wank, and don't bother with it, but aq discussion or question on an act can't be considered too fucking harmful.

It's a pity there aren't universal laws for things like the net, considering the US fucks everything it touches.

Fucking lighten up, for Christ's sake. no-one was advocating child porn at all anyway, and all your overreactions prove is that you can't see the forest for the trees.

You are a joke.

The initial post in the thread was quite explicit and had nothing to do with robots. And no, I don't usually overreact, but I had serious concerns and I tell you what I WOULD have taken it further if it continued without being stopped. And NO, I did not convey that to Odeon. But I would have.

And yes, Lit does post a lot of shit, and he has been banned before.

But really, as I said earlier, if you guys don't have anything better to do than tout this shit or say bullshit like 'oh he wasn't serious', or 'he was on a bad trip'..too bad.

He got a warning....give it a rest.





Title: Re: Young Children
Post by: The_Chosen_One on June 22, 2009, 06:04:43 AM
Seems a bit heavy handed to kick someone if they hadn't violated the TOS, and I'm taking parts' word on this. Also, I'm going on what was said over at zOMG, and if what he said is true, heavy handed would be an under-statement. Still, it's your site, and we are just the membership who keep it going......Oh, and just one word of advice - just because you don't like the ethics or the membership of Soph's site doesn't give you the right to bag them without first checking them out.

Well, my friend, I am a member and I complained about the content of the thread.

And I'm sorry, if you find the topic interesting, too bad. That definitely is not what this site is for. And definitely happy to debate the issue, but I am appalled that the discussion about that sort of thing is something you feel is worth fighting for.

As for Odeon's slant on the TOS, not only are his points valid, specifically, they also state;

We reserve the right to refuse service to anyone. Any material that, in our judgment, is obscene, threatening, illegal, or violates our terms of service in any manner may be removed from our servers (or otherwise disabled), with or without notice.

Failure to respond to email from our abuse department within 48 hours may result in the suspension or termination of your services. All abuse issues must be dealt with via troubleticket/email and will have a response within 48 hours.

If in doubt regarding the acceptability of your site or service, please contact us at abuse@hostgator.com and we will be happy to assist you.

Potential harm to minors is strictly forbidden, including but not limited to child pornography or content perceived to be child pornography (Lolita):

Any site found to host child pornography or linking to child pornography will be suspended immediately without notice.



Therefore, TALKING about harm to minors, or content perceived to be child pornography, exposes the site to being shut down. Apart from being hideously offensive.

And yes, the laws the site are bound to are US laws....not the freehanded laws you and others wish to debate.

And debate away, but the TOS are clear.



Personally I don't give a shit about the subject. It's the criticsm of the guy for merely discussing it that's abhorrent. If he posted pics of porn related material, then fair enough. Buty if it was just a rant or some shit about fucking kids (which was the subject of the anime - a robot fucking an 11 year old), then where is the problem? How much porn have others like TheoK and his ilk have put up on this site, only to have nothing done? Are they threatened with the ban stick because of it? buttcoffee may be a fucktard, and he may post a lot of crap, but as long as it doesn't directly fuck things up, then who gives a shit. I personally think porn is a wank, and don't bother with it, but aq discussion or question on an act can't be considered too fucking harmful.

It's a pity there aren't universal laws for things like the net, considering the US fucks everything it touches.

Fucking lighten up, for Christ's sake. no-one was advocating child porn at all anyway, and all your overreactions prove is that you can't see the forest for the trees.

You are a joke.

The initial post in the thread was quite explicit and had nothing to do with robots. And no, I don't usually overreact, but I had serious concerns and I tell you what I WOULD have taken it further if it continued without being stopped. And NO, I did not convey that to Odeon. But I would have.

And yes, Lit does post a lot of shit, and he has been banned before.

But really, as I said earlier, if you guys don't have anything better to do than tout this shit or say bullshit like 'oh he wasn't serious', or 'he was on a bad trip'..too bad.

He got a warning....give it a rest.







As I never saw the original post either, I can only go by what was said on zOMG, which is as follows

http://www.zomgaspies.com/nooooooooooooooooooooooo-t56377.html

"it seems asking if anyone owns cartoons of children getting raped by huge gigantic robotic cocks like in anime is not allowed at intensity squared either." Is the comment I am referring to. Hardly worth the worry.

read it to get the full context before spouting off a lot of useless bullshit.
Title: Re: Young Children
Post by: Eclair on June 22, 2009, 06:12:31 AM
Seems a bit heavy handed to kick someone if they hadn't violated the TOS, and I'm taking parts' word on this. Also, I'm going on what was said over at zOMG, and if what he said is true, heavy handed would be an under-statement. Still, it's your site, and we are just the membership who keep it going......Oh, and just one word of advice - just because you don't like the ethics or the membership of Soph's site doesn't give you the right to bag them without first checking them out.

Well, my friend, I am a member and I complained about the content of the thread.

And I'm sorry, if you find the topic interesting, too bad. That definitely is not what this site is for. And definitely happy to debate the issue, but I am appalled that the discussion about that sort of thing is something you feel is worth fighting for.

As for Odeon's slant on the TOS, not only are his points valid, specifically, they also state;

We reserve the right to refuse service to anyone. Any material that, in our judgment, is obscene, threatening, illegal, or violates our terms of service in any manner may be removed from our servers (or otherwise disabled), with or without notice.

Failure to respond to email from our abuse department within 48 hours may result in the suspension or termination of your services. All abuse issues must be dealt with via troubleticket/email and will have a response within 48 hours.

If in doubt regarding the acceptability of your site or service, please contact us at abuse@hostgator.com and we will be happy to assist you.

Potential harm to minors is strictly forbidden, including but not limited to child pornography or content perceived to be child pornography (Lolita):

Any site found to host child pornography or linking to child pornography will be suspended immediately without notice.



Therefore, TALKING about harm to minors, or content perceived to be child pornography, exposes the site to being shut down. Apart from being hideously offensive.

And yes, the laws the site are bound to are US laws....not the freehanded laws you and others wish to debate.

And debate away, but the TOS are clear.



Personally I don't give a shit about the subject. It's the criticsm of the guy for merely discussing it that's abhorrent. If he posted pics of porn related material, then fair enough. Buty if it was just a rant or some shit about fucking kids (which was the subject of the anime - a robot fucking an 11 year old), then where is the problem? How much porn have others like TheoK and his ilk have put up on this site, only to have nothing done? Are they threatened with the ban stick because of it? buttcoffee may be a fucktard, and he may post a lot of crap, but as long as it doesn't directly fuck things up, then who gives a shit. I personally think porn is a wank, and don't bother with it, but aq discussion or question on an act can't be considered too fucking harmful.

It's a pity there aren't universal laws for things like the net, considering the US fucks everything it touches.

Fucking lighten up, for Christ's sake. no-one was advocating child porn at all anyway, and all your overreactions prove is that you can't see the forest for the trees.

You are a joke.

The initial post in the thread was quite explicit and had nothing to do with robots. And no, I don't usually overreact, but I had serious concerns and I tell you what I WOULD have taken it further if it continued without being stopped. And NO, I did not convey that to Odeon. But I would have.

And yes, Lit does post a lot of shit, and he has been banned before.

But really, as I said earlier, if you guys don't have anything better to do than tout this shit or say bullshit like 'oh he wasn't serious', or 'he was on a bad trip'..too bad.

He got a warning....give it a rest.







As I never saw the original post either, I can only go by what was said on zOMG, which is as follows

http://www.zomgaspies.com/nooooooooooooooooooooooo-t56377.html

read it to get the full context before spouting off a lot of useless bullshit.

Well, excuse me I DID see the original unedited post. And no, I am not bothered to go to another site, I saw what I saw here, not long after it was posted.

As for me spouting off useless bullshit. I'm quite comfortable with what I did and if you think what I say is bullshit as opposed to the stupid  drivel in the fucking post THAT YOU NEVER SAW, then guess what....I will sleep tonight.

Perhaps you should direct your passionate arguments to something more useful petal?

Title: Re: Young Children
Post by: TheoK on June 22, 2009, 06:13:35 AM
Seems a bit heavy handed to kick someone if they hadn't violated the TOS, and I'm taking parts' word on this. Also, I'm going on what was said over at zOMG, and if what he said is true, heavy handed would be an under-statement. Still, it's your site, and we are just the membership who keep it going......Oh, and just one word of advice - just because you don't like the ethics or the membership of Soph's site doesn't give you the right to bag them without first checking them out.

Well, my friend, I am a member and I complained about the content of the thread.

And I'm sorry, if you find the topic interesting, too bad. That definitely is not what this site is for. And definitely happy to debate the issue, but I am appalled that the discussion about that sort of thing is something you feel is worth fighting for.

As for Odeon's slant on the TOS, not only are his points valid, specifically, they also state;

We reserve the right to refuse service to anyone. Any material that, in our judgment, is obscene, threatening, illegal, or violates our terms of service in any manner may be removed from our servers (or otherwise disabled), with or without notice.

Failure to respond to email from our abuse department within 48 hours may result in the suspension or termination of your services. All abuse issues must be dealt with via troubleticket/email and will have a response within 48 hours.

If in doubt regarding the acceptability of your site or service, please contact us at abuse@hostgator.com and we will be happy to assist you.

Potential harm to minors is strictly forbidden, including but not limited to child pornography or content perceived to be child pornography (Lolita):

Any site found to host child pornography or linking to child pornography will be suspended immediately without notice.



Therefore, TALKING about harm to minors, or content perceived to be child pornography, exposes the site to being shut down. Apart from being hideously offensive.

And yes, the laws the site are bound to are US laws....not the freehanded laws you and others wish to debate.

And debate away, but the TOS are clear.



Personally I don't give a shit about the subject. It's the criticsm of the guy for merely discussing it that's abhorrent. If he posted pics of porn related material, then fair enough. Buty if it was just a rant or some shit about fucking kids (which was the subject of the anime - a robot fucking an 11 year old), then where is the problem? How much porn have others like TheoK and his ilk have put up on this site, only to have nothing done? Are they threatened with the ban stick because of it? buttcoffee may be a fucktard, and he may post a lot of crap, but as long as it doesn't directly fuck things up, then who gives a shit. I personally think porn is a wank, and don't bother with it, but aq discussion or question on an act can't be considered too fucking harmful.

It's a pity there aren't universal laws for things like the net, considering the US fucks everything it touches.

Fucking lighten up, for Christ's sake. no-one was advocating child porn at all anyway, and all your overreactions prove is that you can't see the forest for the trees.

You are a joke.

The initial post in the thread was quite explicit and had nothing to do with robots. And no, I don't usually overreact, but I had serious concerns and I tell you what I WOULD have taken it further if it continued without being stopped. And NO, I did not convey that to Odeon. But I would have.

And yes, Lit does post a lot of shit, and he has been banned before.

But really, as I said earlier, if you guys don't have anything better to do than tout this shit or say bullshit like 'oh he wasn't serious', or 'he was on a bad trip'..too bad.

He got a warning....give it a rest.







 ???

I have been banned on my own request, if we're talking about this board.  8)
Title: Re: Young Children
Post by: Eclair on June 22, 2009, 06:20:43 AM
Yes, Lit and you spoke a lot of shit too, was more my point.
Title: Re: Young Children
Post by: TheoK on June 22, 2009, 06:26:47 AM
:toporly:
Title: Re: Young Children
Post by: Blasted on June 22, 2009, 06:41:15 AM
Lit is a doughnut.  Hard to digest but a doughnut all the same.
Title: Re: Young Children
Post by: Phlexor on June 22, 2009, 06:43:16 AM
The way I see it we are all guests here. You have no rights/ You don't like it, go elsewhere. No one is forcing you to post and read here, you do that on your own.
Title: Re: Young Children
Post by: TheoK on June 22, 2009, 06:44:14 AM
You sound so boring. Why don't you move to my country instead? People here hate freedom and love rules and regulations.
Title: Re: Young Children
Post by: Blasted on June 22, 2009, 06:49:41 AM
You sound so boring. Why don't you move to my country instead? People here hate freedom and love rules and regulations.

Me?

If so, thank you very much but I prefer England  :zoinks:
Title: Re: Young Children
Post by: TheoK on June 22, 2009, 06:50:43 AM
No, Lord Plexiglass sounds like a typically whining Swedish bore.  8)
Title: Re: Young Children
Post by: Phlexor on June 22, 2009, 06:55:34 AM
You sound so boring. Why don't you move to my country instead? People here hate freedom and love rules and regulations.

This place is an internet forum, not a country. There are rules here, not many, and they are to be interpreted in any way seen fit by those running or paying for the place.

Complain all you want, because as far as I know, that is still allowed.
Title: Re: Young Children
Post by: TheoK on June 22, 2009, 06:59:08 AM
:toporly:
Title: Re: Young Children
Post by: Parts on June 22, 2009, 07:35:23 AM
Yes, it's an internet forum and there rules here very easy ones to follow and I like it that way.  Most other places have much more harsh rules here it's simple don't violate the TOS.  If people violate them and there is a problem we all lose and that is one less place to go
Title: Re: Young Children
Post by: TheoK on June 22, 2009, 07:36:46 AM
But Lord Plexiglass sounds like someone who likes rules per se.
Title: Re: Young Children
Post by: Parts on June 22, 2009, 07:39:09 AM
I don't like rules but with out them places like this could not exist I'm sure others would agree with that
Title: Re: Young Children
Post by: Phlexor on June 22, 2009, 07:45:47 AM
But Lord Plexiglass sounds like someone who likes rules per se.

Oh, I sound like I like rules. I suppose that's all the evidence a crackpot like you needs. It puts a lot of faith into your fact finding abilities then.

This place has hardly any fucking rules genius, so why do you think I post here.
Title: Re: Young Children
Post by: odeon on June 22, 2009, 01:10:07 PM
Seems a bit heavy handed to kick someone if they hadn't violated the TOS, and I'm taking parts' word on this. Also, I'm going on what was said over at zOMG, and if what he said is true, heavy handed would be an under-statement. Still, it's your site, and we are just the membership who keep it going......Oh, and just one word of advice - just because you don't like the ethics or the membership of Soph's site doesn't give you the right to bag them without first checking them out.

Well, my friend, I am a member and I complained about the content of the thread.

And I'm sorry, if you find the topic interesting, too bad. That definitely is not what this site is for. And definitely happy to debate the issue, but I am appalled that the discussion about that sort of thing is something you feel is worth fighting for.

As for Odeon's slant on the TOS, not only are his points valid, specifically, they also state;

We reserve the right to refuse service to anyone. Any material that, in our judgment, is obscene, threatening, illegal, or violates our terms of service in any manner may be removed from our servers (or otherwise disabled), with or without notice.

Failure to respond to email from our abuse department within 48 hours may result in the suspension or termination of your services. All abuse issues must be dealt with via troubleticket/email and will have a response within 48 hours.

If in doubt regarding the acceptability of your site or service, please contact us at abuse@hostgator.com and we will be happy to assist you.

Potential harm to minors is strictly forbidden, including but not limited to child pornography or content perceived to be child pornography (Lolita):

Any site found to host child pornography or linking to child pornography will be suspended immediately without notice.



Therefore, TALKING about harm to minors, or content perceived to be child pornography, exposes the site to being shut down. Apart from being hideously offensive.

And yes, the laws the site are bound to are US laws....not the freehanded laws you and others wish to debate.

And debate away, but the TOS are clear.



Personally I don't give a shit about the subject. It's the criticsm of the guy for merely discussing it that's abhorrent. If he posted pics of porn related material, then fair enough. Buty if it was just a rant or some shit about fucking kids (which was the subject of the anime - a robot fucking an 11 year old), then where is the problem? How much porn have others like TheoK and his ilk have put up on this site, only to have nothing done? Are they threatened with the ban stick because of it? buttcoffee may be a fucktard, and he may post a lot of crap, but as long as it doesn't directly fuck things up, then who gives a shit. I personally think porn is a wank, and don't bother with it, but aq discussion or question on an act can't be considered too fucking harmful.

It's a pity there aren't universal laws for things like the net, considering the US fucks everything it touches.

Fucking lighten up, for Christ's sake. no-one was advocating child porn at all anyway, and all your overreactions prove is that you can't see the forest for the trees.

You are a joke.

The initial post in the thread was quite explicit and had nothing to do with robots. And no, I don't usually overreact, but I had serious concerns and I tell you what I WOULD have taken it further if it continued without being stopped. And NO, I did not convey that to Odeon. But I would have.

And yes, Lit does post a lot of shit, and he has been banned before.

But really, as I said earlier, if you guys don't have anything better to do than tout this shit or say bullshit like 'oh he wasn't serious', or 'he was on a bad trip'..too bad.

He got a warning....give it a rest.







 ???

I have been banned on my own request, if we're talking about this board.  8)

Didn't you just delete your account the first time around? I'm pretty sure I have never banned you, at least. :-\
Title: Re: Young Children
Post by: TheoK on June 22, 2009, 01:22:24 PM
No, I was banned on my own request. I never banned myself here.
Title: Re: Young Children
Post by: odeon on June 22, 2009, 01:53:00 PM
No, I was banned on my own request. I never banned myself here.

Oh, righ.
Title: Re: Young Children
Post by: Callaway on June 22, 2009, 03:54:31 PM
No, I was banned on my own request. I never banned myself here.

I think that you asked to have your account deleted but you left and never confirmed the request, so it was deleted after a delay, Litigious. 

I don't remember you being banned.
Title: Re: Young Children
Post by: Christopher McCandless on June 22, 2009, 04:46:05 PM
odeon seems to believe, that asking ...

now, you guys whinge and whine about freedom of speech, but it appears none of you donkey fuckers understand what it means. this is odeon site, wrongplanet jr, if he wants to ban me for writing something that's in bad taste, he can. he can go on and on about how i'm supposedly encouraging people to break the law or how i'm supposedly breaking some imaginary law he got from his idol, Alex Plunk
It is legal under US law, but the terms of the host clearly do not allow it. Look at the TOS thread on here.



Edited stuff that violates TOS out of quote
Title: Re: Young Children
Post by: Small Penis on June 22, 2009, 05:03:10 PM
you should of put [edited by sinsboldly or lau] in my post you funny people
Title: Re: Young Children
Post by: The_Chosen_One on June 22, 2009, 05:15:18 PM
Seems like it.

BTW, how many actually DO read the fucking TOS's of ANY site they log into? Same as when you download and install a program you just hit the 'I agree' button. If anyone actually says yes, then I'd be fucking surprised.....

Oh, and eclair, go fuck yourself with something hard and sandpapery. If you wan't stuff that won't shock and offend on a fucking ADULT forum,  :gotowp:
Title: Re: Young Children
Post by: Christopher McCandless on June 22, 2009, 05:18:13 PM
Seems like it.

BTW, how many actually DO read the fucking TOS's of ANY site they log into? Same as when you download and install a program you just hit the 'I agree' button. If anyone actually says yes, then I'd be fucking surprised.....
Its not Odeon's TOS - its Hostgator's. Unfortunately the US constitution does not extend to websites.
Title: Re: Young Children
Post by: Parts on June 22, 2009, 05:22:23 PM
I just banned him he was warned many times.  I don't want to put up with this shit any more.  Blame me if you want if anyone does like it fuck them fuck it all.  I'll leave if that's what you want if you'd rather have posts like that here I don't want to be here anyway
Title: Re: Young Children
Post by: The_Chosen_One on June 22, 2009, 05:26:01 PM
Seems like it.

BTW, how many actually DO read the fucking TOS's of ANY site they log into? Same as when you download and install a program you just hit the 'I agree' button. If anyone actually says yes, then I'd be fucking surprised.....
Its not Odeon's TOS - its Hostgator's. Unfortunately the US constitution does not extend to websites.

Tells you something about the US constitution, doesn't it. Considering the net is a worldwide phenomenon, international law should apply to everything posted. BTW, as some prats might think I am advocating this bullshit, I have said that I'm AGAINST child por or porn itself. I* am more pissed of in the fact that a DISCUSSION without LINKS AND IMAGES is stifled because of some worry that it violates some arbitrary rule. Discussing a subject is fine under any law, we are not in 1930s Germany. Advocating that people undertake the activity is a different thing.

Title: Re: Young Children
Post by: earthboundmisfit on June 22, 2009, 05:26:48 PM


Jesus tap-dancing christ, it shouldn't even have to be in the TOS. Do people really need to be told specifically not to post CP?



Title: Re: Young Children
Post by: Parts on June 22, 2009, 05:28:29 PM
Seems like it.

BTW, how many actually DO read the fucking TOS's of ANY site they log into? Same as when you download and install a program you just hit the 'I agree' button. If anyone actually says yes, then I'd be fucking surprised.....
Its not Odeon's TOS - its Hostgator's. Unfortunately the US constitution does not extend to websites.

Tells you something about the US constitution, doesn't it. Considering the net is a worldwide phenomenon, international law should apply to everything posted. BTW, as some prats might think I am advocating this bullshit, I have said that I'm AGAINST child por or porn itself. I* am more pissed of in the fact that a DISCUSSION without LINKS AND IMAGES is stifled because of some worry that it violates some arbitrary rule. Discussing a subject is fine under any law, we are not in 1930s Germany. Advocating that people undertake the activity is a different thing.




So how long has he been sucking you dick fuck face
Title: Re: Young Children
Post by: earthboundmisfit on June 22, 2009, 05:29:00 PM

Tells you something about the US constitution, doesn't it. Considering the net is a worldwide phenomenon, international law should apply to everything posted. BTW, as some prats might think I am advocating this bullshit, I have said that I'm AGAINST child por or porn itself. I* am more pissed of in the fact that a DISCUSSION without LINKS AND IMAGES is stifled because of some worry that it violates some arbitrary rule. Discussing a subject is fine under any law, we are not in 1930s Germany. Advocating that people undertake the activity is a different thing.


Jesus dude, give it a rest. Quit trying to make this about whatever grievance you have with the U.S.
Title: Re: Young Children
Post by: Christopher McCandless on June 22, 2009, 05:30:20 PM
Seems like it.

BTW, how many actually DO read the fucking TOS's of ANY site they log into? Same as when you download and install a program you just hit the 'I agree' button. If anyone actually says yes, then I'd be fucking surprised.....
Its not Odeon's TOS - its Hostgator's. Unfortunately the US constitution does not extend to websites.

Tells you something about the US constitution, doesn't it. Considering the net is a worldwide phenomenon, international law should apply to everything posted. BTW, as some prats might think I am advocating this bullshit, I have said that I'm AGAINST child por or porn itself. I* am more pissed of in the fact that a DISCUSSION without LINKS AND IMAGES is stifled because of some worry that it violates some arbitrary rule. Discussing a subject is fine under any law, we are not in 1930s Germany. Advocating that people undertake the activity is a different thing.


I agree - though international law needs to go a lot further. People need to not be penalised for having ideas and expressing them, there should be severe punishments for anyone who uses their power to suppress free candid conversations. Hence why I think a few school shootings targeting bullies isnt entirely a bad idea.
Title: Re: Young Children
Post by: P7PSP on June 22, 2009, 05:35:44 PM
Seems like it.

BTW, how many actually DO read the fucking TOS's of ANY site they log into? Same as when you download and install a program you just hit the 'I agree' button. If anyone actually says yes, then I'd be fucking surprised.....
Its not Odeon's TOS - its Hostgator's. Unfortunately the US constitution does not extend to websites.

Tells you something about the US constitution, doesn't it. Considering the net is a worldwide phenomenon, international law should apply to everything posted. BTW, as some prats might think I am advocating this bullshit, I have said that I'm AGAINST child por or porn itself. I* am more pissed of in the fact that a DISCUSSION without LINKS AND IMAGES is stifled because of some worry that it violates some arbitrary rule. Discussing a subject is fine under any law, we are not in 1930s Germany. Advocating that people undertake the activity is a different thing.


Fuck you and fuck the UN. I don't want blue beanie fuckers in my country.
Title: Re: Young Children
Post by: Callaway on June 22, 2009, 05:36:30 PM
Seems like it.

BTW, how many actually DO read the fucking TOS's of ANY site they log into? Same as when you download and install a program you just hit the 'I agree' button. If anyone actually says yes, then I'd be fucking surprised.....
Its not Odeon's TOS - its Hostgator's. Unfortunately the US constitution does not extend to websites.

Tells you something about the US constitution, doesn't it. Considering the net is a worldwide phenomenon, international law should apply to everything posted. BTW, as some prats might think I am advocating this bullshit, I have said that I'm AGAINST child por or porn itself. I* am more pissed of in the fact that a DISCUSSION without LINKS AND IMAGES is stifled because of some worry that it violates some arbitrary rule. Discussing a subject is fine under any law, we are not in 1930s Germany. Advocating that people undertake the activity is a different thing.



You may not like it, but our host is located in the US and therefore subject to US law, TCO.

We are bound to honor our host's TOS, since if we don't then they could take the site down.

Posting child porn as well as soliciting someone to post child porn violates our TOS, since child porn is against US law.  

However I think that child porn is against the law in almost every country, so even if we were bound to follow international law, it would still be illegal.

Title: Re: Young Children
Post by: The_Chosen_One on June 22, 2009, 08:09:10 PM
Seems like it.

BTW, how many actually DO read the fucking TOS's of ANY site they log into? Same as when you download and install a program you just hit the 'I agree' button. If anyone actually says yes, then I'd be fucking surprised.....
Its not Odeon's TOS - its Hostgator's. Unfortunately the US constitution does not extend to websites.

Tells you something about the US constitution, doesn't it. Considering the net is a worldwide phenomenon, international law should apply to everything posted. BTW, as some prats might think I am advocating this bullshit, I have said that I'm AGAINST child por or porn itself. I* am more pissed of in the fact that a DISCUSSION without LINKS AND IMAGES is stifled because of some worry that it violates some arbitrary rule. Discussing a subject is fine under any law, we are not in 1930s Germany. Advocating that people undertake the activity is a different thing.



You may not like it, but our host is located in the US and therefore subject to US law, TCO.

We are bound to honor our host's TOS, since if we don't then they could take the site down.

Posting child porn as well as soliciting someone to post child porn violates our TOS, since child porn is against US law.  

However I think that child porn is against the law in almost every country, so even if we were bound to follow international law, it would still be illegal.



All I'm saying is that asking about whether someone had it happen and discussing it isn't actually violating any rule. Posting images and links to sites and also engaging in child porn itself is against the law, but freedom of speech still applies. The whole thing is arbitrary and subjective.

Also, if child porn is not tolerated, which it isn't, then why are images of ordinary porn allowed?

Anyway, the person who started it is gone, so it's virtually a moot point.
Title: Re: Young Children
Post by: RageBeoulve on June 22, 2009, 08:12:18 PM
Seems like it.

BTW, how many actually DO read the fucking TOS's of ANY site they log into? Same as when you download and install a program you just hit the 'I agree' button. If anyone actually says yes, then I'd be fucking surprised.....
Its not Odeon's TOS - its Hostgator's. Unfortunately the US constitution does not extend to websites.

Tells you something about the US constitution, doesn't it. Considering the net is a worldwide phenomenon, international law should apply to everything posted. BTW, as some prats might think I am advocating this bullshit, I have said that I'm AGAINST child por or porn itself. I* am more pissed of in the fact that a DISCUSSION without LINKS AND IMAGES is stifled because of some worry that it violates some arbitrary rule. Discussing a subject is fine under any law, we are not in 1930s Germany. Advocating that people undertake the activity is a different thing.



You may not like it, but our host is located in the US and therefore subject to US law, TCO.

We are bound to honor our host's TOS, since if we don't then they could take the site down.

Posting child porn as well as soliciting someone to post child porn violates our TOS, since child porn is against US law.  

However I think that child porn is against the law in almost every country, so even if we were bound to follow international law, it would still be illegal.



All I'm saying is that asking about whether someone had it happen and discussing it isn't actually violating any rule. Posting images and links to sites and also engaging in child porn itself is against the law, but freedom of speech still applies. The whole thing is arbitrary and subjective.

Also, if child porn is not tolerated, which it isn't, then why are images of ordinary porn allowed?

Anyway, the person who started it is gone, so it's virtually a moot point.

Are you comparing making pornography with consenting adults to making child pornography?
Title: Re: Young Children
Post by: earthboundmisfit on June 22, 2009, 08:12:25 PM

Also, if child porn is not tolerated, which it isn't, then why are images of ordinary porn allowed?


Are you fucking kidding me?
Title: Re: Young Children
Post by: The_Chosen_One on June 22, 2009, 08:35:46 PM

Also, if child porn is not tolerated, which it isn't, then why are images of ordinary porn allowed?


Are you fucking kidding me?

Site Direction -> Pointing Out The Obvious pp 3 & 4.

Do I look like I'm kidding, dickwad?
Title: Re: Young Children
Post by: RageBeoulve on June 22, 2009, 08:39:12 PM

Also, if child porn is not tolerated, which it isn't, then why are images of ordinary porn allowed?


Are you fucking kidding me?

Site Direction -> Pointing Out The Obvious pp 3 & 4.

Do I look like I'm kidding, dickwad?

Child porn and constenting adults making porn cannot be compared with each other. You're either trolling, or you have no grip on reality whatsoever. I suggest you tell your therapist about this.
Title: Re: Young Children
Post by: earthboundmisfit on June 22, 2009, 08:48:00 PM

Site Direction -> Pointing Out The Obvious pp 3 & 4.


Yes. Ball licking. Good stuff.

Perfectly fine according to the TOS.
Title: Re: Young Children
Post by: RageBeoulve on June 22, 2009, 08:49:04 PM

Also, if child porn is not tolerated, which it isn't, then why are images of ordinary porn allowed?


Are you fucking kidding me?

Site Direction -> Pointing Out The Obvious pp 3 & 4.

Do I look like I'm kidding, dickwad?

Oh yeah. Ball licking. So?
Title: Re: Young Children
Post by: The_Chosen_One on June 22, 2009, 09:47:34 PM

Also, if child porn is not tolerated, which it isn't, then why are images of ordinary porn allowed?


Are you fucking kidding me?

Site Direction -> Pointing Out The Obvious pp 3 & 4.

Do I look like I'm kidding, dickwad?

Child porn and constenting adults making porn cannot be compared with each other. You're either trolling, or you have no grip on reality whatsoever. I suggest you tell your therapist about this.

It seems pretty hypocritical to ban issues on child sex, which is abhorrent, yet freely post porn which still violates the TOS of ANY fucking site.
It's you cunts who need to get a grip on reality, instead of playing with yerselves all day.

Why do you think porn sites are being shut down? Because the authorities firnd it offensive and they don't see a difference between kiddie porn, gay porn and ordinary.

Hey, I don't write the fucking rules, but they are there, so it's either one out, all out, or quit fucking whining.

Go see your own therapist, asshole, and suck him off while you are there.
Title: Re: Young Children
Post by: Callaway on June 22, 2009, 10:18:16 PM
All I'm saying is that asking about whether someone had it happen and discussing it isn't actually violating any rule. Posting images and links to sites and also engaging in child porn itself is against the law, but freedom of speech still applies. The whole thing is arbitrary and subjective.

Also, if child porn is not tolerated, which it isn't, then why are images of ordinary porn allowed?

Anyway, the person who started it is gone, so it's virtually a moot point.

Ordinary porn is not illegal and involves consenting adults, while child porn is illegal and involves children who aren't old enough to sign a contract or give consent.
Title: Re: Young Children
Post by: RageBeoulve on June 22, 2009, 10:21:59 PM

Also, if child porn is not tolerated, which it isn't, then why are images of ordinary porn allowed?


Are you fucking kidding me?

Site Direction -> Pointing Out The Obvious pp 3 & 4.

Do I look like I'm kidding, dickwad?

Child porn and constenting adults making porn cannot be compared with each other. You're either trolling, or you have no grip on reality whatsoever. I suggest you tell your therapist about this.

It seems pretty hypocritical to ban issues on child sex, which is abhorrent, yet freely post porn which still violates the TOS of ANY fucking site.
It's you cunts who need to get a grip on reality, instead of playing with yerselves all day.

Why do you think porn sites are being shut down? Because the authorities firnd it offensive and they don't see a difference between kiddie porn, gay porn and ordinary.

Hey, I don't write the fucking rules, but they are there, so it's either one out, all out, or quit fucking whining.

Go see your own therapist, asshole, and suck him off while you are there.

So you're the law now?

Quote
Why do you think porn sites are being shut down? Because the authorities firnd it offensive and they don't see a difference between kiddie porn, gay porn and ordinary.

Probably because of internet crimes like phishing and such.

And if you cand see the difference between porns with adults in it, and porn with children in it...

Then you have a serious problem. :facepalm2:

Title: Re: Young Children
Post by: The_Chosen_One on June 22, 2009, 10:42:15 PM
I can, asshole, but that isn't the point. Check out any legal article on what the authorities permit on the net, such as youtube, fora and personal sites, and they are targeting ALL types of porn, consenting or otherwise. They are the ones who have a problem, so take the issue up with them. Afterall, the internet is public domain. Also, don't believe everything you see about ages of contributors in these fora or even on any other adult site. Children have been known to lie about their ages to gain access, and all you need is an email account to create an ID.

Just cos it says you have to be 18+ to get in doesn't mean that kids aren't posting here.
Title: Re: Young Children
Post by: odeon on June 23, 2009, 12:28:43 AM
Seems like it.

BTW, how many actually DO read the fucking TOS's of ANY site they log into? Same as when you download and install a program you just hit the 'I agree' button. If anyone actually says yes, then I'd be fucking surprised.....

Oh, and eclair, go fuck yourself with something hard and sandpapery. If you wan't stuff that won't shock and offend on a fucking ADULT forum,  :gotowp:

What you say is beside the point. Try to grow a brain.
Title: Re: Young Children
Post by: odeon on June 23, 2009, 12:31:53 AM
Seems like it.

BTW, how many actually DO read the fucking TOS's of ANY site they log into? Same as when you download and install a program you just hit the 'I agree' button. If anyone actually says yes, then I'd be fucking surprised.....
Its not Odeon's TOS - its Hostgator's. Unfortunately the US constitution does not extend to websites.

Tells you something about the US constitution, doesn't it. Considering the net is a worldwide phenomenon, international law should apply to everything posted. BTW, as some prats might think I am advocating this bullshit, I have said that I'm AGAINST child por or porn itself. I* am more pissed of in the fact that a DISCUSSION without LINKS AND IMAGES is stifled because of some worry that it violates some arbitrary rule. Discussing a subject is fine under any law, we are not in 1930s Germany. Advocating that people undertake the activity is a different thing.


I agree - though international law needs to go a lot further. People need to not be penalised for having ideas and expressing them, there should be severe punishments for anyone who uses their power to suppress free candid conversations. Hence why I think a few school shootings targeting bullies isnt entirely a bad idea.

So in your brave new world, who's going to protect the children against child molesters trying to hide behind the pretense of free speech?

WTF is wrong with you two?
Title: Re: Young Children
Post by: Eclair on June 23, 2009, 02:30:20 AM
Seems like it.

BTW, how many actually DO read the fucking TOS's of ANY site they log into? Same as when you download and install a program you just hit the 'I agree' button. If anyone actually says yes, then I'd be fucking surprised.....

Oh, and eclair, go fuck yourself with something hard and sandpapery. If you wan't stuff that won't shock and offend on a fucking ADULT forum,  :gotowp:

What you say is beside the point. Try to grow a brain.

Oh, so IT IS an ADULT forum? Interesting point for you to ponder, the concept of CHILD vs ADULT.

The point is not what offends me or not, everyone has their own opinion of what is right or wrong, but you miss the point.

TOS are TOS and my email to Odeon was exactly about that. I am happy for him to post the full content of my message to him, which is quite clear about my concerns about TOS. Had he allowed it continue, I would have thought it was irresponsible. Having worked in law issues and federal security issues, I know a little bit about how things are tracked.

Another thread where Lit discussed planning to bomb government authorities, I also made a comment about that what was written could be construed as being a planning of something and best to abandon the conversations.

My issues on morals are seperate, and although I am happy to debate them, you miss the context of why I alerted Odeon to this thread.

If I see something that I think could pick up on a scan as a threat to closing down the site, then I will take action.

As for my own ideas about what is right and wrong, I will debate them here, if I care to.

As for whether you can be bothered to read TOS or not...not anyone's problem. The site is pretty liberal, but if you want to relate explicit details about that topic, it's not going to happen here.





Title: Re: Young Children
Post by: The_Chosen_One on June 23, 2009, 05:59:51 AM
Seems like it.

BTW, how many actually DO read the fucking TOS's of ANY site they log into? Same as when you download and install a program you just hit the 'I agree' button. If anyone actually says yes, then I'd be fucking surprised.....

Oh, and eclair, go fuck yourself with something hard and sandpapery. If you wan't stuff that won't shock and offend on a fucking ADULT forum,  :gotowp:

What you say is beside the point. Try to grow a brain.

Get fucked, cunt. Yer on ignore.
Title: Re: Young Children
Post by: Phlexor on June 23, 2009, 06:07:52 AM
Seems like it.

BTW, how many actually DO read the fucking TOS's of ANY site they log into? Same as when you download and install a program you just hit the 'I agree' button. If anyone actually says yes, then I'd be fucking surprised.....

Oh, and eclair, go fuck yourself with something hard and sandpapery. If you wan't stuff that won't shock and offend on a fucking ADULT forum,  :gotowp:

What you say is beside the point. Try to grow a brain.

Get fucked, cunt. Yer on ignore.

Why the fuck do you bother coming back here? You don't like this place, you don't like anyone here and you are suck a complete dickhead that you own yourself and no one likes you.
Title: Re: Young Children
Post by: Eclair on June 23, 2009, 06:25:43 AM
Seems like it.

BTW, how many actually DO read the fucking TOS's of ANY site they log into? Same as when you download and install a program you just hit the 'I agree' button. If anyone actually says yes, then I'd be fucking surprised.....

Oh, and eclair, go fuck yourself with something hard and sandpapery. If you wan't stuff that won't shock and offend on a fucking ADULT forum,  :gotowp:

What you say is beside the point. Try to grow a brain.

Get fucked, cunt. Yer on ignore.

 :LMAO:

So YOU put Odeon on ignore because you didn't like the advice on the TOS for this site....Oh fuck me, you are hilarious.

If you are such an advocate for the subject, then take it elsewhere. I think we will all live with it.
Title: Re: Young Children
Post by: The_Chosen_One on June 23, 2009, 06:27:27 AM
Simply because there is some interest, and some of you are OK. But if the fucktards here want to be such ignorant dickheads, and keep their heads up their arses, then who am I to judge.

Fucking load of wankers.
Title: Re: Young Children
Post by: Blasted on June 23, 2009, 06:30:14 AM
Ignorant dickheads because they are against child porn?  Hey, I thought you were alright  :thumbdn:
Title: Re: Young Children
Post by: Eclair on June 23, 2009, 06:33:32 AM
Simply because there is some interest, and some of you are OK. But if the fucktards here want to be such ignorant dickheads, and keep their heads up their arses, then who am I to judge.

Fucking load of wankers.


Yes, best you start your own site. Run along now, sweet pea.

A tip: Read your TOS so you know what is acceptable and what is not. Hey, I know it's a long document, and I'd love to help you decipher the 'FUCKING CHILD PORN CONVERSATIONS ARE NOT OK", but I'm too busy fucking myself with sandpaper....which, I still believe is legal.

Sandpaper is always consenting.

What a crazy world we live in. Fear not....I only fuck sandpaper over 21.
Title: Re: Young Children
Post by: The_Chosen_One on June 23, 2009, 06:34:13 AM
Seems like it.

BTW, how many actually DO read the fucking TOS's of ANY site they log into? Same as when you download and install a program you just hit the 'I agree' button. If anyone actually says yes, then I'd be fucking surprised.....

Oh, and eclair, go fuck yourself with something hard and sandpapery. If you wan't stuff that won't shock and offend on a fucking ADULT forum,  :gotowp:

What you say is beside the point. Try to grow a brain.

Get fucked, cunt. Yer on ignore.

 :LMAO:

So YOU put Odeon on ignore because you didn't like the advice on the TOS for this site....Oh fuck me, you are hilarious.

If you are such an advocate for the subject, then take it elsewhere. I think we will all live with it.


Pull yer head out of your arse, you cream filled chocolate cake. AS I FUCKING SAID, I AM NOT ADVOCATING THAT SHIT, YOU FERAL BITCH.

I DON'T have a problem with the TOS either, you blind poor excuse for a gimp. What I DO have a problem with is high-moral high stepping bints like you who come on a site like this and whinge about the slightest thing to the admin, then expect to walk off scot free.

Shove it up your festering arse, you disease ridden shit.
Title: Re: Young Children
Post by: RageBeoulve on June 23, 2009, 06:40:59 AM
Seems like it.

BTW, how many actually DO read the fucking TOS's of ANY site they log into? Same as when you download and install a program you just hit the 'I agree' button. If anyone actually says yes, then I'd be fucking surprised.....

Oh, and eclair, go fuck yourself with something hard and sandpapery. If you wan't stuff that won't shock and offend on a fucking ADULT forum,  :gotowp:

What you say is beside the point. Try to grow a brain.

Get fucked, cunt. Yer on ignore.

 :LMAO:

So YOU put Odeon on ignore because you didn't like the advice on the TOS for this site....Oh fuck me, you are hilarious.

If you are such an advocate for the subject, then take it elsewhere. I think we will all live with it.


Pull yer head out of your arse, you cream filled chocolate cake. AS I FUCKING SAID, I AM NOT ADVOCATING THAT SHIT, YOU FERAL BITCH.

I DON'T have a problem with the TOS either, you blind poor excuse for a gimp. What I DO have a problem with is high-moral high stepping bints like you who come on a site like this and whinge about the slightest thing to the admin, then expect to walk off scot free.

Shove it up your festering arse, you disease ridden shit.

You make me laugh man. You're just getting pissed and arguing for the sake of argument.

Quote
I can, asshole, but that isn't the point. Check out any legal article on what the authorities permit on the net, such as youtube, fora and personal sites, and they are targeting ALL types of porn, consenting or otherwise. They are the ones who have a problem, so take the issue up with them. Afterall, the internet is public domain. Also, don't believe everything you see about ages of contributors in these fora or even on any other adult site. Children have been known to lie about their ages to gain access, and all you need is an email account to create an ID.

Just cos it says you have to be 18+ to get in doesn't mean that kids aren't posting here.

You also have people outside of the internet who would like to get rid of porn there too. That doesn't prove a thing man. Go ahead and tattle on us to these "authorities" you're talking about and see if they'll come and spank us for posting a few butts and tits on here.

Bet they won't do anything, so just shut the fuck up dude. :lol:
Title: Re: Young Children
Post by: Eclair on June 23, 2009, 06:41:30 AM
Seems like it.

BTW, how many actually DO read the fucking TOS's of ANY site they log into? Same as when you download and install a program you just hit the 'I agree' button. If anyone actually says yes, then I'd be fucking surprised.....

Oh, and eclair, go fuck yourself with something hard and sandpapery. If you wan't stuff that won't shock and offend on a fucking ADULT forum,  :gotowp:

What you say is beside the point. Try to grow a brain.

Get fucked, cunt. Yer on ignore.

 :LMAO:

So YOU put Odeon on ignore because you didn't like the advice on the TOS for this site....Oh fuck me, you are hilarious.

If you are such an advocate for the subject, then take it elsewhere. I think we will all live with it.


Pull yer head out of your arse, you cream filled chocolate cake. AS I FUCKING SAID, I AM NOT ADVOCATING THAT SHIT, YOU FERAL BITCH.

I DON'T have a problem with the TOS either, you blind poor excuse for a gimp. What I DO have a problem with is high-moral high stepping bints like you who come on a site like this and whinge about the slightest thing to the admin, then expect to walk off scot free.

Shove it up your festering arse, you disease ridden shit.

I walk off scot free?

Spare me. You talked about CP, I could push for your IP address  to be surrendered to the authorities and have you investigated for child porn.

What would you prefer...a warning or an investigation?

Title: Re: Young Children
Post by: The_Chosen_One on June 23, 2009, 06:52:29 AM
Seems like it.

BTW, how many actually DO read the fucking TOS's of ANY site they log into? Same as when you download and install a program you just hit the 'I agree' button. If anyone actually says yes, then I'd be fucking surprised.....

Oh, and eclair, go fuck yourself with something hard and sandpapery. If you wan't stuff that won't shock and offend on a fucking ADULT forum,  :gotowp:

What you say is beside the point. Try to grow a brain.

Get fucked, cunt. Yer on ignore.

 :LMAO:

So YOU put Odeon on ignore because you didn't like the advice on the TOS for this site....Oh fuck me, you are hilarious.

If you are such an advocate for the subject, then take it elsewhere. I think we will all live with it.


Pull yer head out of your arse, you cream filled chocolate cake. AS I FUCKING SAID, I AM NOT ADVOCATING THAT SHIT, YOU FERAL BITCH.

I DON'T have a problem with the TOS either, you blind poor excuse for a gimp. What I DO have a problem with is high-moral high stepping bints like you who come on a site like this and whinge about the slightest thing to the admin, then expect to walk off scot free.

Shove it up your festering arse, you disease ridden shit.

I walk off scot free?

Spare me. You talked about CP, I could push for your IP address  to be surrendered to the authorities and have you investigated for child porn.

What would you prefer...a warning or an investigation?



Are you fucking serial, you braindead twat? Were you dropped at birth or kicked around the yard as a football? That must explain the brain damage inside that thing you refer to as a skull.

I have nothing to worry about, there anre no images here. Discussions are words, and words mean nothing. Obviously your autism is so severe it has fucked up your reading and comprehension as well. Surprised you made it out of special school.

Get over yourself, you git.
Title: Re: Young Children
Post by: RageBeoulve on June 23, 2009, 06:56:23 AM
Seems like it.

BTW, how many actually DO read the fucking TOS's of ANY site they log into? Same as when you download and install a program you just hit the 'I agree' button. If anyone actually says yes, then I'd be fucking surprised.....

Oh, and eclair, go fuck yourself with something hard and sandpapery. If you wan't stuff that won't shock and offend on a fucking ADULT forum,  :gotowp:

What you say is beside the point. Try to grow a brain.

Get fucked, cunt. Yer on ignore.

 :LMAO:

So YOU put Odeon on ignore because you didn't like the advice on the TOS for this site....Oh fuck me, you are hilarious.

If you are such an advocate for the subject, then take it elsewhere. I think we will all live with it.


Pull yer head out of your arse, you cream filled chocolate cake. AS I FUCKING SAID, I AM NOT ADVOCATING THAT SHIT, YOU FERAL BITCH.

I DON'T have a problem with the TOS either, you blind poor excuse for a gimp. What I DO have a problem with is high-moral high stepping bints like you who come on a site like this and whinge about the slightest thing to the admin, then expect to walk off scot free.

Shove it up your festering arse, you disease ridden shit.

You make me laugh man. You're just getting pissed and arguing for the sake of argument.

Quote
I can, asshole, but that isn't the point. Check out any legal article on what the authorities permit on the net, such as youtube, fora and personal sites, and they are targeting ALL types of porn, consenting or otherwise. They are the ones who have a problem, so take the issue up with them. Afterall, the internet is public domain. Also, don't believe everything you see about ages of contributors in these fora or even on any other adult site. Children have been known to lie about their ages to gain access, and all you need is an email account to create an ID.

Just cos it says you have to be 18+ to get in doesn't mean that kids aren't posting here.

You also have people outside of the internet who would like to get rid of porn there too. That doesn't prove a thing man. Go ahead and tattle on us to these "authorities" you're talking about and see if they'll come and spank us for posting a few butts and tits on here.

Bet they won't do anything, so just shut the fuck up dude. :lol:
Title: Re: Young Children
Post by: The_Chosen_One on June 23, 2009, 07:02:02 AM
And for the mentally handicapped, there was no CP posted here, none at all. Never was. Only imagined by a psychologically unsound minority.

END OF FUCKING STORY!
Title: Re: Young Children
Post by: RageBeoulve on June 23, 2009, 07:05:43 AM
And for the mentally handicapped, there was no CP posted here, none at all. Never was. Only imagined by a psychologically unsound minority.

END OF FUCKING STORY!

So? CP is attention getting stuff. I'm sure he would have posted it anyway if he wasn't banned. Besides, you don't even know what was actually posted here in the first place. Did you see it? No, you didn't.  :green:

You saw what the fag SAID he posted in a thread on zomg. He didn't post anything about anime or robot cocks. He talked about having sex with children.
Title: Re: Young Children
Post by: RageBeoulve on June 23, 2009, 07:18:10 AM
Oh I almost forgot.

End of fucking story for real this time.
Title: Re: Young Children
Post by: Phlexor on June 23, 2009, 08:16:03 AM
And for the mentally handicapped, there was no CP posted here, none at all. Never was. Only imagined by a psychologically unsound minority.

END OF FUCKING STORY!

Dude, just fuck off already. You don't like anyone here, so why stay?

Your only value is that you own yourself in a spectacular way.
Title: Re: Young Children
Post by: odeon on June 23, 2009, 10:37:21 AM
And for the mentally handicapped, there was no CP posted here, none at all. Never was. Only imagined by a psychologically unsound minority.

END OF FUCKING STORY!

He's sort of funny when he's angry. :laugh:
Title: Re: Young Children
Post by: odeon on June 23, 2009, 10:38:29 AM
And for the mentally handicapped, there was no CP posted here, none at all. Never was. Only imagined by a psychologically unsound minority.

END OF FUCKING STORY!

Dude, just fuck off already. You don't like anyone here, so why stay?

Your only value is that you own yourself in a spectacular way.

:agreed:
Title: Re: Young Children
Post by: odeon on June 23, 2009, 10:40:17 AM
I don't really need to post Eclair's PM to me, do I? The only one with a reading problem here seems to be TCO, and he's got me on Ignore.
Title: Re: Young Children
Post by: Phlexor on June 23, 2009, 11:06:28 AM
I don't really need to post Eclair's PM to me, do I? The only one with a reading problem here seems to be TCO, and he's got me on Ignore.

Pretty much.
Title: Re: Young Children
Post by: Christopher McCandless on June 23, 2009, 11:11:42 AM
I don't really need to post Eclair's PM to me, do I? The only one with a reading problem here seems to be TCO, and he's got me on Ignore.
What PM is this? Or more to the point, what drama?
Title: Re: Young Children
Post by: earthboundmisfit on June 23, 2009, 12:06:18 PM


...Oh fuck me


BEST QUOTE OF THE WHOLE THREAD   :penis:
Title: Re: Young Children
Post by: Christopher McCandless on June 23, 2009, 12:43:58 PM
And for the mentally handicapped, there was no CP posted here, none at all. Never was. Only imagined by a psychologically unsound minority.

END OF FUCKING STORY!

He's sort of funny when he's angry. :laugh:
Me and Kosmo had some fun...
Title: Re: Young Children
Post by: Callaway on June 23, 2009, 12:44:50 PM
And for the mentally handicapped, there was no CP posted here, none at all. Never was. Only imagined by a psychologically unsound minority.

END OF FUCKING STORY!

He's sort of funny when he's angry. :laugh:
Me and Kosmo had some fun...

When?  Recently?
Title: Re: Young Children
Post by: Adam on June 23, 2009, 01:10:58 PM


...Oh fuck me


BEST QUOTE OF THE WHOLE THREAD   :penis:

LOL  :plus:
Title: Re: Young Children
Post by: odeon on June 23, 2009, 01:42:26 PM
I don't really need to post Eclair's PM to me, do I? The only one with a reading problem here seems to be TCO, and he's got me on Ignore.
What PM is this? Or more to the point, what drama?

Eclair PM'd me (do read this thread) about SP's little cp post, wondering if it was within our TOS or not. She OK'd me to publish it if need be, but I think everyone but TCO already knows.
Title: Re: Young Children
Post by: odeon on June 23, 2009, 01:43:24 PM
And for the mentally handicapped, there was no CP posted here, none at all. Never was. Only imagined by a psychologically unsound minority.

END OF FUCKING STORY!

He's sort of funny when he's angry. :laugh:
Me and Kosmo had some fun...

When?  Recently?

About a year ago, I think. That's when TCO left, feeling unappreciated and whatnot.
Title: Re: Young Children
Post by: P7PSP on June 23, 2009, 01:48:40 PM
I certainly don't need to see it. At this point I am amazed that I could have considered an immature cunt like TCO a friend. He's in his forties IIRC and I know 6th graders that are more mature.
Title: Re: Young Children
Post by: odeon on June 23, 2009, 01:50:46 PM
I think he was cornered into something he really doesn't believe in, in this case. /shrugs

He should be old enough to revalue his statements, though.
Title: Re: Young Children
Post by: P7PSP on June 23, 2009, 01:53:30 PM
Yes, pretending or actually being stupid enough to believe that there is no difference between adult porn and CP is just ridiculous.
Title: Re: Young Children
Post by: RageBeoulve on June 23, 2009, 01:54:20 PM
I think he was cornered into something he really doesn't believe in, in this case. /shrugs

He should be old enough to revalue his statements, though.

It was stupid. One could say I pwned him, but no. I didn't. He pwned himself. I was just there to point it out.
Title: Re: Young Children
Post by: odeon on June 23, 2009, 02:00:24 PM
Yes, pretending or actually being stupid enough to believe that there is no difference between adult porn and CP is just ridiculous.

It got a bit thin at that point, yes.
Title: Re: Young Children
Post by: RageBeoulve on June 23, 2009, 02:01:33 PM
Yes, pretending or actually being stupid enough to believe that there is no difference between adult porn and CP is just ridiculous.

It got a bit thin at that point, yes.

It got absolutely retarded you mean. ::)
Title: Re: Young Children
Post by: odeon on June 23, 2009, 02:15:11 PM
Yes, pretending or actually being stupid enough to believe that there is no difference between adult porn and CP is just ridiculous.

It got a bit thin at that point, yes.

It got absolutely retarded you mean. ::)

It's a British understatement. I'm like that. :P
Title: Re: Young Children
Post by: RageBeoulve on June 23, 2009, 02:15:56 PM
Yes, pretending or actually being stupid enough to believe that there is no difference between adult porn and CP is just ridiculous.

It got a bit thin at that point, yes.

It got absolutely retarded you mean. ::)

It's a British understatement. I'm like that. :P

Indeed.  :zoinks:
Title: Re: Young Children
Post by: The_Chosen_One on June 23, 2009, 05:10:18 PM
A quote from buttcoffee:

"1. I'm gonna make a list because my daddy told me lists always make everyone feel better.  Yo, VIP, lets kick it.
2. I forgot about the bestiality picture.
3. I didn't violate that site TOS with my post asking if anyone has fucked a child in the mouth or impregnated a 11 year old. Anyways, it's funny how you keep a post from someone else that is exactly like my post, but you delete and ban me. Seems like wrongplanet, no?
4. The one about huge gigantic robotic cocks raping little girls probably wouldn't get you banned, i suppose, but i don't run this site. Haven't you seen those anime with robotic cocks flying around raping little girls. I think it maybe called hentai
5. I'm not peepeegay, he likes to brag about getting banned from internet sites. RAD!!!!!!!!!
6. Who am i suppose to brag to about getting banned from intensitysquared? I don't think many people know of that site or would even give a poopy if i got banned from there.
7. I agree, peepeegay is mentally challenged.
8. I'm cooking mc's like a pound of bacon.
9. my goal on intensitysquared was to be annoying, that's about it.
10. I didn't post any descriptions of child molestation, so i don't know what you're talking about with that one.
11. I'm trying to make this list extra looooooooong and i'm having a bad case of acid reflux. It woke me up
12. Ed McMahon died earlier this morning Crying or Very sad
13. Why did you guys really ban me? simply reading the TOS for i2, it's clear i didn't violate any of their rules.
14. If there was a problem, yo i'll solve it. Checkout the hook while my DJ revolves it.
15. Yo my style is like a chemical spill
16. This is the end of my list. Now don't you feel better, I suure do."

As far as I'm concerned, you cunts are why autism gets no respect in the real world, and that mental illness is treated like it is. I don't suffer from any fucking disease like you have, fortunately, so as far as I'm concerned, you can take you site and shove it up your collective arse.

GET FUCKED THE LOT OF YOU!
_
Title: Re: Young Children
Post by: Adam on June 23, 2009, 05:13:03 PM
This whole thread is a load of [expletive removed by sinsboldly]. :wanker:
Title: Re: Young Children
Post by: RageBeoulve on June 23, 2009, 05:22:50 PM
A quote from buttcoffee:

"1. I'm gonna make a list because my daddy told me lists always make everyone feel better.  Yo, VIP, lets kick it.
2. I forgot about the bestiality picture.
3. I didn't violate that site TOS with my post asking if anyone has fucked a child in the mouth or impregnated a 11 year old. Anyways, it's funny how you keep a post from someone else that is exactly like my post, but you delete and ban me. Seems like wrongplanet, no?
4. The one about huge gigantic robotic cocks raping little girls probably wouldn't get you banned, i suppose, but i don't run this site. Haven't you seen those anime with robotic cocks flying around raping little girls. I think it maybe called hentai
5. I'm not peepeegay, he likes to brag about getting banned from internet sites. RAD!!!!!!!!!
6. Who am i suppose to brag to about getting banned from intensitysquared? I don't think many people know of that site or would even give a poopy if i got banned from there.
7. I agree, peepeegay is mentally challenged.
8. I'm cooking mc's like a pound of bacon.
9. my goal on intensitysquared was to be annoying, that's about it.
10. I didn't post any descriptions of child molestation, so i don't know what you're talking about with that one.
11. I'm trying to make this list extra looooooooong and i'm having a bad case of acid reflux. It woke me up
12. Ed McMahon died earlier this morning Crying or Very sad
13. Why did you guys really ban me? simply reading the TOS for i2, it's clear i didn't violate any of their rules.
14. If there was a problem, yo i'll solve it. Checkout the hook while my DJ revolves it.
15. Yo my style is like a chemical spill
16. This is the end of my list. Now don't you feel better, I suure do."

As far as I'm concerned, you cunts are why autism gets no respect in the real world, and that mental illness is treated like it is. I don't suffer from any fucking disease like you have, fortunately, so as far as I'm concerned, you can take you site and shove it up your collective arse.

GET FUCKED THE LOT OF YOU!
_

That was pointless. However your crying is like music to my ears man.

I bet you were one seriously bratty kid. Do your parents hate you? I would have disowned you. ::)

This whole thread is a load of [expletive removed by sinsboldly]. :wanker:

I loled dude.  :green:
Title: Re: Young Children
Post by: Pyraxis on June 23, 2009, 05:29:27 PM
So did I. I've never heard sinsboldly in action but I can imagine she sounds rather like Eclair.  :P
Title: Re: Young Children
Post by: The_Chosen_One on June 23, 2009, 05:36:37 PM
A quote from buttcoffee:

"1. I'm gonna make a list because my daddy told me lists always make everyone feel better.  Yo, VIP, lets kick it.
2. I forgot about the bestiality picture.
3. I didn't violate that site TOS with my post asking if anyone has fucked a child in the mouth or impregnated a 11 year old. Anyways, it's funny how you keep a post from someone else that is exactly like my post, but you delete and ban me. Seems like wrongplanet, no?
4. The one about huge gigantic robotic cocks raping little girls probably wouldn't get you banned, i suppose, but i don't run this site. Haven't you seen those anime with robotic cocks flying around raping little girls. I think it maybe called hentai
5. I'm not peepeegay, he likes to brag about getting banned from internet sites. RAD!!!!!!!!!
6. Who am i suppose to brag to about getting banned from intensitysquared? I don't think many people know of that site or would even give a poopy if i got banned from there.
7. I agree, peepeegay is mentally challenged.
8. I'm cooking mc's like a pound of bacon.
9. my goal on intensitysquared was to be annoying, that's about it.
10. I didn't post any descriptions of child molestation, so i don't know what you're talking about with that one.
11. I'm trying to make this list extra looooooooong and i'm having a bad case of acid reflux. It woke me up
12. Ed McMahon died earlier this morning Crying or Very sad
13. Why did you guys really ban me? simply reading the TOS for i2, it's clear i didn't violate any of their rules.
14. If there was a problem, yo i'll solve it. Checkout the hook while my DJ revolves it.
15. Yo my style is like a chemical spill
16. This is the end of my list. Now don't you feel better, I suure do."

As far as I'm concerned, you cunts are why autism gets no respect in the real world, and that mental illness is treated like it is. I don't suffer from any fucking disease like you have, fortunately, so as far as I'm concerned, you can take you site and shove it up your collective arse.

GET FUCKED THE LOT OF YOU!
_

That was priceless. However your right and it is like music to my ears man.

I bet you were one seriously smart kid. Do your enemies fear you? I would have shit myself in terror. ::)

This whole thread is a load of [expletive removed by sinsboldly]. :wanker:

I loled dude.  :green:
Title: Re: Young Children
Post by: RageBeoulve on June 23, 2009, 05:45:29 PM
A quote from buttcoffee:

"1. I'm gonna make a list because my daddy told me lists always make everyone feel better.  Yo, VIP, lets kick it.
2. I forgot about the bestiality picture.
3. I didn't violate that site TOS with my post asking if anyone has fucked a child in the mouth or impregnated a 11 year old. Anyways, it's funny how you keep a post from someone else that is exactly like my post, but you delete and ban me. Seems like wrongplanet, no?
4. The one about huge gigantic robotic cocks raping little girls probably wouldn't get you banned, i suppose, but i don't run this site. Haven't you seen those anime with robotic cocks flying around raping little girls. I think it maybe called hentai
5. I'm not peepeegay, he likes to brag about getting banned from internet sites. RAD!!!!!!!!!
6. Who am i suppose to brag to about getting banned from intensitysquared? I don't think many people know of that site or would even give a poopy if i got banned from there.
7. I agree, peepeegay is mentally challenged.
8. I'm cooking mc's like a pound of bacon.
9. my goal on intensitysquared was to be annoying, that's about it.
10. I didn't post any descriptions of child molestation, so i don't know what you're talking about with that one.
11. I'm trying to make this list extra looooooooong and i'm having a bad case of acid reflux. It woke me up
12. Ed McMahon died earlier this morning Crying or Very sad
13. Why did you guys really ban me? simply reading the TOS for i2, it's clear i didn't violate any of their rules.
14. If there was a problem, yo i'll solve it. Checkout the hook while my DJ revolves it.
15. Yo my style is like a chemical spill
16. This is the end of my list. Now don't you feel better, I suure do."

As far as I'm concerned, you cunts are why autism gets no respect in the real world, and that mental illness is treated like it is. I don't suffer from any fucking disease like you have, fortunately, so as far as I'm concerned, you can take you site and shove it up your collective arse.

GET FUCKED THE LOT OF YOU!
_

That was priceless. However your right and it is like music to my ears man.

I bet you were one seriously smart kid. Do your enemies fear you? I would have shit myself in terror. ::)

This whole thread is a load of [expletive removed by sinsboldly]. :wanker:

I loled dude.  :green:



Lol look at this guy. He comes crawling back. Look dude you'll never be right as long as you think pornography and cp are the same thing. Thats retarded, and you're retarded. I really don't think you realize how stupid you look right now, and I feel just a little embarassed for you. But just a little. I mean this IS only the internet after all.
Title: Re: Young Children
Post by: P7PSP on June 23, 2009, 06:10:25 PM
As far as I'm concerned, you cunts are why autism gets no respect in the real world, and that mental illness is treated like it is. I don't suffer from any fucking disease like you have, fortunately, so as far as I'm concerned, you can take you site and shove it up your collective arse.

GET FUCKED THE LOT OF YOU!
_
What you do suffer from is being an EMO PUSSY! When a youngster like Hardon, who is only half your chronological age, can cause you the angst that he did, you just show us why you couldn't hack it in the real world working a gimme job that the Rehab people got you emo boy.
Title: Re: Young Children
Post by: The_Chosen_One on June 23, 2009, 06:11:14 PM
A quote from buttcoffee:

"1. I'm gonna make a list because my daddy told me lists always make everyone feel better.  Yo, VIP, lets kick it.
2. I forgot about the bestiality picture.
3. I didn't violate that site TOS with my post asking if anyone has fucked a child in the mouth or impregnated a 11 year old. Anyways, it's funny how you keep a post from someone else that is exactly like my post, but you delete and ban me. Seems like wrongplanet, no?
4. The one about huge gigantic robotic cocks raping little girls probably wouldn't get you banned, i suppose, but i don't run this site. Haven't you seen those anime with robotic cocks flying around raping little girls. I think it maybe called hentai
5. I'm not peepeegay, he likes to brag about getting banned from internet sites. RAD!!!!!!!!!
6. Who am i suppose to brag to about getting banned from intensitysquared? I don't think many people know of that site or would even give a poopy if i got banned from there.
7. I agree, peepeegay is mentally challenged.
8. I'm cooking mc's like a pound of bacon.
9. my goal on intensitysquared was to be annoying, that's about it.
10. I didn't post any descriptions of child molestation, so i don't know what you're talking about with that one.
11. I'm trying to make this list extra looooooooong and i'm having a bad case of acid reflux. It woke me up
12. Ed McMahon died earlier this morning Crying or Very sad
13. Why did you guys really ban me? simply reading the TOS for i2, it's clear i didn't violate any of their rules.
14. If there was a problem, yo i'll solve it. Checkout the hook while my DJ revolves it.
15. Yo my style is like a chemical spill
16. This is the end of my list. Now don't you feel better, I suure do."

As far as I'm concerned, you cunts are why autism gets no respect in the real world, and that mental illness is treated like it is. I don't suffer from any fucking disease like you have, fortunately, so as far as I'm concerned, you can take you site and shove it up your collective arse.

GET FUCKED THE LOT OF YOU!
_

That was priceless. However your right and it is like music to my ears man.

I bet you were one seriously smart kid. Do your enemies fear you? I would have shit myself in terror. ::)

This whole thread is a load of [expletive removed by sinsboldly]. :wanker:

I loled dude.  :green:



Lol look at this guy.  Look dude you'll always be right as long as you think pornography and cp are the same thing. Thats not retarded, that's fact and I'm retarded. I really don't think you realize how stupid I look right now, and I feel just a little embarassed for myself. But just a little. I mean this IS only the internet after all.

Fixed
Title: Re: Young Children
Post by: earthboundmisfit on June 23, 2009, 06:13:12 PM


wow, clever.
Title: Re: Young Children
Post by: The_Chosen_One on June 23, 2009, 06:13:57 PM
As far as I'm concerned, you cunts are why autism gets no respect in the real world, and that mental illness is treated like it is. I don't suffer from any fucking disease like you have, fortunately, so as far as I'm concerned, you can take you site and shove it up your collective arse.

GET FUCKED THE LOT OF YOU!
_
I AM A RETARDED FUCKWIT WHO COULDN'T HOLD A JOB IN THE REAL WORLD, NOT EVEN AT MACCAS
Title: Re: Young Children
Post by: Adam on June 23, 2009, 06:14:47 PM
Consensual adult porn is not the same as child abuse/exploitation dude
Title: Re: Young Children
Post by: RageBeoulve on June 23, 2009, 06:16:34 PM
A quote from buttcoffee:

"1. I'm gonna make a list because my daddy told me lists always make everyone feel better.  Yo, VIP, lets kick it.
2. I forgot about the bestiality picture.
3. I didn't violate that site TOS with my post asking if anyone has fucked a child in the mouth or impregnated a 11 year old. Anyways, it's funny how you keep a post from someone else that is exactly like my post, but you delete and ban me. Seems like wrongplanet, no?
4. The one about huge gigantic robotic cocks raping little girls probably wouldn't get you banned, i suppose, but i don't run this site. Haven't you seen those anime with robotic cocks flying around raping little girls. I think it maybe called hentai
5. I'm not peepeegay, he likes to brag about getting banned from internet sites. RAD!!!!!!!!!
6. Who am i suppose to brag to about getting banned from intensitysquared? I don't think many people know of that site or would even give a poopy if i got banned from there.
7. I agree, peepeegay is mentally challenged.
8. I'm cooking mc's like a pound of bacon.
9. my goal on intensitysquared was to be annoying, that's about it.
10. I didn't post any descriptions of child molestation, so i don't know what you're talking about with that one.
11. I'm trying to make this list extra looooooooong and i'm having a bad case of acid reflux. It woke me up
12. Ed McMahon died earlier this morning Crying or Very sad
13. Why did you guys really ban me? simply reading the TOS for i2, it's clear i didn't violate any of their rules.
14. If there was a problem, yo i'll solve it. Checkout the hook while my DJ revolves it.
15. Yo my style is like a chemical spill
16. This is the end of my list. Now don't you feel better, I suure do."

As far as I'm concerned, you cunts are why autism gets no respect in the real world, and that mental illness is treated like it is. I don't suffer from any fucking disease like you have, fortunately, so as far as I'm concerned, you can take you site and shove it up your collective arse.

GET FUCKED THE LOT OF YOU!
_

That was priceless. However your right and it is like music to my ears man.

I bet you were one seriously smart kid. Do your enemies fear you? I would have shit myself in terror. ::)

This whole thread is a load of [expletive removed by sinsboldly]. :wanker:

I loled dude.  :green:



Lol look at this guy.  Look dude you'll always be right as long as you think pornography and cp are the same thing. Thats not retarded, that's fact and I'm retarded. I really don't think you realize how stupid I look right now, and I feel just a little embarassed for myself. But just a little. I mean this IS only the internet after all.

Fixed

Dude. You should quit while you're ahead. That was even more retarded than your last retort.  :facepalm2:
Title: Re: Young Children
Post by: The_Chosen_One on June 23, 2009, 06:18:28 PM
Consensual adult porn is not the same as child abuse/exploitation dude

Still illegal on any forum, regardless. Check the laws. Porn is porn is porn.
Title: Re: Young Children
Post by: RageBeoulve on June 23, 2009, 06:19:01 PM
Consensual adult porn is not the same as child abuse/exploitation dude

Still illegal on any forum, regardless. Check the laws. Porn is porn is porn.

Prove it.
No. In fact, I will give you a scenario pal. The answer to this one is easy. You have no choice but to post pornography in a forum. You can choose to post cp, or post consentual adults having sex.

Which one?
Title: Re: Young Children
Post by: Adam on June 23, 2009, 06:20:30 PM
Consensual adult porn is not the same as child abuse/exploitation dude

Still illegal on any forum, regardless. Check the laws. Porn is porn is porn.

How is "normal" adult porn illegal?

"Porn is porn is porn" is completely wrong in this case - cp is totally different. It's in a completely different league to regular porn. It's abuse.
Title: Re: Young Children
Post by: The_Chosen_One on June 23, 2009, 06:21:00 PM
A quote from buttcoffee:

"1. I'm gonna make a list because my daddy told me lists always make everyone feel better.  Yo, VIP, lets kick it.
2. I forgot about the bestiality picture.
3. I didn't violate that site TOS with my post asking if anyone has fucked a child in the mouth or impregnated a 11 year old. Anyways, it's funny how you keep a post from someone else that is exactly like my post, but you delete and ban me. Seems like wrongplanet, no?
4. The one about huge gigantic robotic cocks raping little girls probably wouldn't get you banned, i suppose, but i don't run this site. Haven't you seen those anime with robotic cocks flying around raping little girls. I think it maybe called hentai
5. I'm not peepeegay, he likes to brag about getting banned from internet sites. RAD!!!!!!!!!
6. Who am i suppose to brag to about getting banned from intensitysquared? I don't think many people know of that site or would even give a poopy if i got banned from there.
7. I agree, peepeegay is mentally challenged.
8. I'm cooking mc's like a pound of bacon.
9. my goal on intensitysquared was to be annoying, that's about it.
10. I didn't post any descriptions of child molestation, so i don't know what you're talking about with that one.
11. I'm trying to make this list extra looooooooong and i'm having a bad case of acid reflux. It woke me up
12. Ed McMahon died earlier this morning Crying or Very sad
13. Why did you guys really ban me? simply reading the TOS for i2, it's clear i didn't violate any of their rules.
14. If there was a problem, yo i'll solve it. Checkout the hook while my DJ revolves it.
15. Yo my style is like a chemical spill
16. This is the end of my list. Now don't you feel better, I suure do."

As far as I'm concerned, you cunts are why autism gets no respect in the real world, and that mental illness is treated like it is. I don't suffer from any fucking disease like you have, fortunately, so as far as I'm concerned, you can take you site and shove it up your collective arse.

GET FUCKED THE LOT OF YOU!
_

That was priceless. However your right and it is like music to my ears man.

I bet you were one seriously smart kid. Do your enemies fear you? I would have shit myself in terror. ::)

This whole thread is a load of [expletive removed by sinsboldly]. :wanker:

I loled dude.  :green:



Lol look at this guy.  Look dude you'll always be right as long as you think pornography and cp are the same thing. Thats not retarded, that's fact and I'm retarded. I really don't think you realize how stupid I look right now, and I feel just a little embarassed for myself. But just a little. I mean this IS only the internet after all.

Fixed

Dude. Thanks for correcting me. My last comment was even more retarded than your last retort.  :facepalm2:
Title: Re: Young Children
Post by: P7PSP on June 23, 2009, 06:21:54 PM
 :violin: Poor widdle TCO, hims got  :pwned: by Hardon and Flakey.  :lol:  :hahaha:
Title: Re: Young Children
Post by: RageBeoulve on June 23, 2009, 06:24:20 PM
A quote from buttcoffee:

"1. I'm gonna make a list because my daddy told me lists always make everyone feel better.  Yo, VIP, lets kick it.
2. I forgot about the bestiality picture.
3. I didn't violate that site TOS with my post asking if anyone has fucked a child in the mouth or impregnated a 11 year old. Anyways, it's funny how you keep a post from someone else that is exactly like my post, but you delete and ban me. Seems like wrongplanet, no?
4. The one about huge gigantic robotic cocks raping little girls probably wouldn't get you banned, i suppose, but i don't run this site. Haven't you seen those anime with robotic cocks flying around raping little girls. I think it maybe called hentai
5. I'm not peepeegay, he likes to brag about getting banned from internet sites. RAD!!!!!!!!!
6. Who am i suppose to brag to about getting banned from intensitysquared? I don't think many people know of that site or would even give a poopy if i got banned from there.
7. I agree, peepeegay is mentally challenged.
8. I'm cooking mc's like a pound of bacon.
9. my goal on intensitysquared was to be annoying, that's about it.
10. I didn't post any descriptions of child molestation, so i don't know what you're talking about with that one.
11. I'm trying to make this list extra looooooooong and i'm having a bad case of acid reflux. It woke me up
12. Ed McMahon died earlier this morning Crying or Very sad
13. Why did you guys really ban me? simply reading the TOS for i2, it's clear i didn't violate any of their rules.
14. If there was a problem, yo i'll solve it. Checkout the hook while my DJ revolves it.
15. Yo my style is like a chemical spill
16. This is the end of my list. Now don't you feel better, I suure do."

As far as I'm concerned, you cunts are why autism gets no respect in the real world, and that mental illness is treated like it is. I don't suffer from any fucking disease like you have, fortunately, so as far as I'm concerned, you can take you site and shove it up your collective arse.

GET FUCKED THE LOT OF YOU!
_

That was priceless. However your right and it is like music to my ears man.

I bet you were one seriously smart kid. Do your enemies fear you? I would have shit myself in terror. ::)

This whole thread is a load of [expletive removed by sinsboldly]. :wanker:

I loled dude.  :green:



Lol look at this guy.  Look dude you'll always be right as long as you think pornography and cp are the same thing. Thats not retarded, that's fact and I'm retarded. I really don't think you realize how stupid I look right now, and I feel just a little embarassed for myself. But just a little. I mean this IS only the internet after all.

Fixed

Dude. Thanks for correcting me. My last comment was even more retarded than your last retort.  :facepalm2:

Thats only funny when elle does it, because she does it to be funny. You're doing it in a childish attempt to flex your tiny e-peen. Really sad man. You're twice my age. Quit acting like a pissed off little brother.
Title: Re: Young Children
Post by: The_Chosen_One on June 23, 2009, 06:26:37 PM
Consensual adult porn is not the same as child abuse/exploitation dude

Still illegal on any forum, regardless. Check the laws. Porn is porn is porn.

How is "normal" adult porn illegal?

"Porn is porn is porn" is completely wrong in this case - cp is totally different. It's in a completely different league to regular porn. It's abuse.

Yes it is, and abhorrent. Unfortunately, the cops cannot differentiate because when they spot an offender and seize the computer, ANY pornographic image is considered fair game. Britain had a law dated 1964 about the distribution of obscene and pornographic material; I think it is still valid, and it would cover the internet now. Most other countries may have similar laws, so all porn is grouped into the one category, as far as the authorities are concerned. That's one reason why you don't allow it on zOMG, Soph.
Title: Re: Young Children
Post by: RageBeoulve on June 23, 2009, 06:27:54 PM
Consensual adult porn is not the same as child abuse/exploitation dude

Still illegal on any forum, regardless. Check the laws. Porn is porn is porn.

How is "normal" adult porn illegal?

"Porn is porn is porn" is completely wrong in this case - cp is totally different. It's in a completely different league to regular porn. It's abuse.

Yes it is, and abhorrent. Unfortunately, the cops cannot differentiate because when they spot an offender and seize the computer, ANY pornographic image is considered fair game. Britain had a law dated 1964 about the distribution of obscene and pornographic material; I think it is still valid, and it would cover the internet now. Most other countries may have similar laws, so all porn is grouped into the one category, as far as the authorities are concerned. That's one reason why you don't allow it on zOMG, Soph.

Ah. I'm an american. HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA!
Title: Re: Young Children
Post by: Adam on June 23, 2009, 06:31:04 PM
We don't allow it on zomg because of the host TOS - it's a lot stricter than the one here. Porn is not illegal here TCO. There are some laws about "obscene" "extreme" pornography that were talked about a lot last year IIRC, but that was mostly to do with violence and rape-depictions (for the record I don't think violent porn should be illegal either, as long as everyone involved is consenting)
Title: Re: Young Children
Post by: P7PSP on June 23, 2009, 06:32:36 PM
Consensual adult porn is not the same as child abuse/exploitation dude

Still illegal on any forum, regardless. Check the laws. Porn is porn is porn.

How is "normal" adult porn illegal?

"Porn is porn is porn" is completely wrong in this case - cp is totally different. It's in a completely different league to regular porn. It's abuse.

Yes it is, and abhorrent. Unfortunately, the cops cannot differentiate because when they spot an offender and seize the computer, ANY pornographic image is considered fair game. Britain had a law dated 1964 about the distribution of obscene and pornographic material; I think it is still valid, and it would cover the internet now. Most other countries may have similar laws, so all porn is grouped into the one category, as far as the authorities are concerned. That's one reason why you don't allow it on zOMG, Soph.
That may be the case in Australia but here in the US there is very little regulation of porn, with the exception of kiddie porn and IIRC a woman got convicted of bestiality in this country last year for fucking a German Shepherd.
Title: Re: Young Children
Post by: RageBeoulve on June 23, 2009, 06:33:41 PM
We don't allow it on zomg because of the host TOS - it's a lot stricter than the one here. Porn is not illegal here TCO. There are some laws about "obscene" "extreme" pornography that were talked about a lot last year IIRC, but that was mostly to do with violence and rape-depictions (for the record I don't think violent porn should be illegal either, as long as everyone involved is consenting)

I can barely contain my laughter. Stop embarassing yourself TCO. You completely lost control of yourself because of something that happened on the internet. We're right. Heinrich, ppk, odeon, misfit, me.. we're right. You are wroooooooong. Go back to zomg or whatever.
Title: Re: Young Children
Post by: RageBeoulve on June 23, 2009, 06:34:30 PM

Dude. Thanks for correcting me. My last comment was even more retarded than your last retort.  :facepalm2:
You'r
Thats even more funny than when elle does it, because she onlydoes it to be funny. I wish I had HALF the brains you do. You're twice my age. I should stop carrying on like a pissed off little brother.

Glad you finally admit it, gayboy.
[/quote]

Lmao fail. You can't even edit quotes. You must be so pissed off! LOLOL.
Title: Re: Young Children
Post by: The_Chosen_One on June 23, 2009, 06:45:55 PM
Du bis eine vertselegger und scheisskopf.
Title: Re: Young Children
Post by: RageBeoulve on June 23, 2009, 06:46:24 PM
Du bis eine vertselegger und scheisskopf.

No idea what that means.
Title: Re: Young Children
Post by: Adam on June 23, 2009, 06:47:44 PM
You are a [don't know?] and shithead

I think  :zombiefuck:
Title: Re: Young Children
Post by: The_Chosen_One on June 23, 2009, 06:48:34 PM
Du bis eine vertselegger und scheisskopf.

No idea what that means.

Didn't think so. Not so smart, cookie boy?
Title: Re: Young Children
Post by: P7PSP on June 23, 2009, 06:48:53 PM
Du bis eine vertselegger und scheisskopf.
Another TCO tantrum.
Title: Re: Young Children
Post by: RageBeoulve on June 23, 2009, 06:50:05 PM
You are a [don't know?] and shithead

I think  :zombiefuck:

I take it I pwned him then and he just doesn't know what else to say? Well good. Looks like the issue is closed then. Gentlemen, good work.  ::)
Title: Re: Young Children
Post by: RageBeoulve on June 23, 2009, 06:50:42 PM
Du bis eine vertselegger und scheisskopf.

No idea what that means.

Didn't think so. Not so smart, cookie boy?

LOL. Oh my god I wish the big O was here for this one.  :lol:
Title: Re: Young Children
Post by: P7PSP on June 23, 2009, 07:02:28 PM
I take it I pwned him then and he just doesn't know what else to say? Well good. Looks like the issue is closed then. Gentlemen, good work.  ::)
I wouldn't bet on that Rage. He did call you cookie boy.  :hahaha: He is improving, maybe in another 10 years we can have him up to a 6th grade level of sarcasm.
Title: Re: Young Children
Post by: RageBeoulve on June 23, 2009, 07:11:40 PM
I take it I pwned him then and he just doesn't know what else to say? Well good. Looks like the issue is closed then. Gentlemen, good work.  ::)
I wouldn't bet on that Rage. He did call you cookie boy.  :hahaha: He is improving, maybe in another 10 years we can have him up to a 6th grade level of sarcasm.

Whew. I better look out huh?  :o
Title: Re: Young Children
Post by: earthboundmisfit on June 23, 2009, 07:26:04 PM


Quote from: The_Chosen_One
Jesus H Fucking Christ, why am I the only one who gets singled out for actually speaking up for what I believe?


Someone has a christ complex.
Title: Re: Young Children
Post by: The_Chosen_One on June 23, 2009, 07:33:57 PM


Quote from: The_Chosen_One
Jesus H Fucking Christ, why am I the only one who gets singled out for actually speaking up for what I believe?


Someone has a christ complex.

Christ was a Jew. Exterminated. 1st century Final Solution. The Romans knew how to treat people. Nazis = 20th century Romans.
Title: Re: Young Children
Post by: Pyraxis on June 23, 2009, 07:35:44 PM
Quote from: The_Chosen_One
Jesus H Fucking Christ, why am I the only one who gets singled out for actually speaking up for what I believe?

You're not. It's just your turn today.
Title: Re: Young Children
Post by: P7PSP on June 23, 2009, 07:38:21 PM
Quote from: The_Chosen_One
Jesus H Fucking Christ, why am I the only one who gets singled out for actually speaking up for what I believe?

You're not. It's just your turn today.
:plus: Funny and true.
Title: Re: Young Children
Post by: RageBeoulve on June 23, 2009, 07:45:33 PM
Quote from: The_Chosen_One
Jesus H Fucking Christ, why am I the only one who gets singled out for actually speaking up for what I believe?

You're not. It's just your turn today.

TCO. No. But seriously. You were wrong, and I know you saw that afterwards. I admire that you tried to stick to your guns and all, but in cases when you try to pass off CP and pornography as the same..

Just be an adult and laugh it off instead of getting embarassed and trying to agrue until its right.

 :thumbup:
Title: Re: Young Children
Post by: earthboundmisfit on June 23, 2009, 07:51:06 PM


TCO. No. But seriously. You were wrong, and I know you saw that afterwards. I admire that you tried to stick to your guns and all, but in cases when you try to pass off CP and pornography as the same..

Just be an adult and laugh it off instead of getting embarassed and trying to agrue until its right.

 :thumbup:


QFT.  :plus:

I'm done here. This thread has run its course, and has become tiresome rather than amusing following it.
Title: Re: Young Children
Post by: RageBeoulve on June 23, 2009, 07:55:09 PM


TCO. No. But seriously. You were wrong, and I know you saw that afterwards. I admire that you tried to stick to your guns and all, but in cases when you try to pass off CP and pornography as the same..

Just be an adult and laugh it off instead of getting embarassed and trying to agrue until its right.

 :thumbup:


QFT.  :plus:

I'm done here. This thread has run its course, and has become tiresome rather than amusing following it.

Yeah. It was funny as hell at first though.  :indeed:
Title: Re: Young Children
Post by: Parts on June 23, 2009, 08:03:14 PM
I hear Adolf has been causing problems here I am here to help
Title: Re: Young Children
Post by: Pyraxis on June 23, 2009, 08:04:20 PM
 :lol:
Title: Re: Young Children
Post by: Adam on June 23, 2009, 08:05:11 PM
I'm here too muthafuckas :flamer:
Title: Re: Young Children
Post by: RageBeoulve on June 23, 2009, 08:12:14 PM
Ok now this thread is funny again.  :zoinks:
Title: Re: Young Children
Post by: Parts on June 23, 2009, 08:14:22 PM
Where is Patton I need Patton
Title: Re: Young Children
Post by: Adam on June 23, 2009, 08:16:38 PM
American pussies. In Soviet Russia, Patton needs YOU
Title: Re: Young Children
Post by: Parts on June 23, 2009, 08:18:12 PM
Don't worry we will deal with you when this is over
Title: Re: Young Children
Post by: P7PSP on June 23, 2009, 08:29:49 PM
Where is Patton I need Patton
Reporting for Duty Sir!
Title: Re: Young Children
Post by: Parts on June 23, 2009, 08:34:48 PM
Bing up your tanks
Title: Re: Young Children
Post by: P7PSP on June 23, 2009, 08:36:39 PM
Binging them up Sir! I understand we have a loopy 5th grade house painter on the loose.
Title: Re: Young Children
Post by: The_Chosen_One on June 23, 2009, 08:40:14 PM
I have now taken control. This is my domain, and all people who disagree will be banned. TOS or no TOS.

Title: Re: Young Children
Post by: Parts on June 23, 2009, 08:41:28 PM
Well something need to be done look for the sloppy workmanship and fire
Title: Re: Young Children
Post by: P7PSP on June 23, 2009, 08:41:56 PM
I have now taken control. This is my domain, and all people who disagree will be banned. TOS or no TOS.


If you're trying to make odeon cry like you do it'll take more then that feeble attempt.
Title: Re: Young Children
Post by: The_Chosen_One on June 23, 2009, 08:43:54 PM
Personally, I don't care. buttcoffee and peabrain did a good enough job on their own. TOS or no TOS.

Where's a good Calandale when you need them?
Title: Re: Young Children
Post by: Parts on June 23, 2009, 08:46:15 PM
I have now taken control. This is my domain, and all people who disagree will be banned. TOS or no TOS.


If you're trying to make odeon cry like you do it'll take more then that feeble attempt.

Gave up on Hitler so fast? I took the time ti get an icon and everything Now what are you sponge bob and your more of a Sqidward
Title: Re: Young Children
Post by: Parts on June 23, 2009, 08:46:59 PM
Calandale is hardly around when you want him
Title: Re: Young Children
Post by: P7PSP on June 23, 2009, 08:47:59 PM
I have now taken control. This is my domain, and all people who disagree will be banned. TOS or no TOS.


If you're trying to make odeon cry like you do it'll take more then that feeble attempt.

Gave up on Hitler so fast? I took the time ti get an icon and everything Now what are you sponge bob and your more of a Sqidward
:lol:  :indeed:
Title: Re: Young Children
Post by: RageBeoulve on June 23, 2009, 09:00:28 PM
I have now taken control. This is my domain, and all people who disagree will be banned. TOS or no TOS.



I disagree.
Title: Re: Young Children
Post by: The_Chosen_One on June 23, 2009, 09:16:05 PM
I have now taken control. This is my domain, and all people who disagree will be banned. TOS or no TOS.



I disagree.

/banned.
Title: Re: Young Children
Post by: odeon on June 24, 2009, 12:49:19 AM
I have now taken control. This is my domain, and all people who disagree will be banned. TOS or no TOS.


If you're trying to make odeon cry like you do it'll take more then that feeble attempt.

I'm crying inside. Really I am.
Title: Re: Young Children
Post by: Blasted on June 24, 2009, 01:31:50 AM
And I missed all this  :'(
Title: Re: Young Children
Post by: Eclair on June 24, 2009, 02:02:00 AM

...Oh fuck me

BEST QUOTE OF THE WHOLE THREAD   :penis:

So what's holding you back....apparently we should all be fucking!...

GET FUCKED THE LOT OF YOU!
_

Title: Re: Young Children
Post by: The_Chosen_One on June 24, 2009, 02:05:49 AM

...Oh fuck me

BEST QUOTE OF THE WHOLE THREAD   :penis:

So what's holding you back....apparently we should all be fucking!...

GET FUCKED THE LOT OF YOU!
_



Because you can't take advice from the fuckless, as Billy Connolly would say. It's in the TOS
Title: Re: Young Children
Post by: Parts on June 24, 2009, 04:59:36 AM
Nickelodeon  is that a name to attract  the kiddies?
Title: Re: Young Children
Post by: RageBeoulve on June 24, 2009, 06:12:37 AM

...Oh fuck me

BEST QUOTE OF THE WHOLE THREAD   :penis:

So what's holding you back....apparently we should all be fucking!...

GET FUCKED THE LOT OF YOU!
_



Because you can't take advice from the fuckless, as Billy Connolly would say. It's in the TOS


Hey, why don't you do something about it then? Oh thats right, you can't.  :lol:
Title: Re: Young Children
Post by: The_Chosen_One on June 24, 2009, 05:40:15 PM
Considering you are already fucked, you've got a pretty good start. I mean, just look in the mirror. If my dog had a head like yours, I'd shoot the bastard and put it out of it's misery.
Title: Re: Young Children
Post by: Blasted on June 25, 2009, 06:28:12 AM
Are you sure you're not confusing his and your own mirror reflection?  :orly:
Title: Re: Young Children
Post by: RageBeoulve on June 25, 2009, 06:42:40 AM
Considering you are already fucked, you've got a pretty good start. I mean, just look in the mirror. If my dog had a head like yours, I'd shoot the bastard and put it out of it's misery.

No idea what that meant. I'm fucked? So you're gonna come and kick my butt? Oh please don't hurt me mr. internet tough guy.

210 henry mason way, jeffersonville indiana

 :zoinks:
Title: Re: Young Children
Post by: Pyraxis on June 25, 2009, 06:44:41 AM
Are you sure you're not confusing his and your own mirror reflection?  :orly:

I think if my dog had anybody's human head, I would be rather concerned for its welfare.
Title: Re: Young Children
Post by: Blasted on June 25, 2009, 06:48:23 AM
Are you sure you're not confusing his and your own mirror reflection?  :orly:

I think if my dog had anybody's human head, I would be rather concerned for its welfare.

 :lol:
Title: Re: Young Children
Post by: The_Chosen_One on June 25, 2009, 07:58:10 AM
Considering you are already fucked, you've got a pretty good start. I mean, just look in the mirror. If my dog had a head like yours, I'd shoot the bastard and put it out of it's misery.

No idea what that meant. I'm fucked? So you're gonna come and kick my butt? Oh please don't hurt me mr. internet tough guy.

210 henry mason way, jeffersonville indiana

 :zoinks:

What, the Jeffersonville Town Dump? Where they drop all the toxic waste and other shit? Why doesn't that surprise me?

Besides, I'd kick your 12 year old pimply arse from here to breakfast-time, you weedy little runt. Go get your father, he might be a better challenge. That's if you can get him off dialysis long enough.

 :pwned: :wanker:
Title: Re: Young Children
Post by: Blasted on June 25, 2009, 08:01:32 AM
Considering you are already fucked, you've got a pretty good start. I mean, just look in the mirror. If my dog had a head like yours, I'd shoot the bastard and put it out of it's misery.

No idea what that meant. I'm fucked? So you're gonna come and kick my butt? Oh please don't hurt me mr. internet tough guy.

210 henry mason way, jeffersonville indiana

 :zoinks:

What, the Jeffersonville Town Dump? Where they drop all the toxic waste and other shit? Why doesn't that surprise me?

Besides, I'd kick your 12 year old pimply arse from here to breakfast-time, you weedy little runt. Go get your father, he might be a better challenge. That's if you can get him off dialysis long enough.

 :pwned: :wanker:

Haha he is anything but weedy  :lol:  Not 12 either  :zoinks:

Fail.
Title: Re: Young Children
Post by: RageBeoulve on June 25, 2009, 08:12:28 AM
Considering you are already fucked, you've got a pretty good start. I mean, just look in the mirror. If my dog had a head like yours, I'd shoot the bastard and put it out of it's misery.

No idea what that meant. I'm fucked? So you're gonna come and kick my butt? Oh please don't hurt me mr. internet tough guy.

210 henry mason way, jeffersonville indiana

 :zoinks:

What, the Jeffersonville Town Dump? Where they drop all the toxic waste and other shit? Why doesn't that surprise me?

Besides, I'd kick your 12 year old pimply arse from here to breakfast-time, you weedy little runt. Go get your father, he might be a better challenge. That's if you can get him off dialysis long enough.

 :pwned: :wanker:

I'd say that too if I was you. Afraid? I understand. ;D
Title: Re: Young Children
Post by: Parts on June 25, 2009, 08:18:40 AM
Considering you are already fucked, you've got a pretty good start. I mean, just look in the mirror. If my dog had a head like yours, I'd shoot the bastard and put it out of it's misery.

No idea what that meant. I'm fucked? So you're gonna come and kick my butt? Oh please don't hurt me mr. internet tough guy.

210 henry mason way, jeffersonville indiana

 :zoinks:

What, the Jeffersonville Town Dump? Where they drop all the toxic waste and other shit? Why doesn't that surprise me?

Besides, I'd kick your 12 year old pimply arse from here to breakfast-time, you weedy little runt. Go get your father, he might be a better challenge. That's if you can get him off dialysis long enough.

 :pwned: :wanker:


He is out of your league trust me :laugh:
Title: Re: Young Children
Post by: RageBeoulve on June 25, 2009, 08:22:17 AM
Considering you are already fucked, you've got a pretty good start. I mean, just look in the mirror. If my dog had a head like yours, I'd shoot the bastard and put it out of it's misery.

No idea what that meant. I'm fucked? So you're gonna come and kick my butt? Oh please don't hurt me mr. internet tough guy.

210 henry mason way, jeffersonville indiana

 :zoinks:

What, the Jeffersonville Town Dump? Where they drop all the toxic waste and other shit? Why doesn't that surprise me?

Besides, I'd kick your 12 year old pimply arse from here to breakfast-time, you weedy little runt. Go get your father, he might be a better challenge. That's if you can get him off dialysis long enough.

 :pwned: :wanker:


He is out of your league trust me :laugh:

Lmao. Its the only way he could save face. He'll most likely continue to talk tough and make threats without actually doing anything. The outcome is obvious.

He just likes talking shit thats all. ::)
Title: Re: Young Children
Post by: Blasted on June 25, 2009, 08:27:31 AM
Rage > TCO  8)
Title: Re: Young Children
Post by: RageBeoulve on June 25, 2009, 08:32:10 AM
Rage > TCO  8)

 :-* Thanks babe.
Title: Re: Young Children
Post by: The_Chosen_One on June 25, 2009, 06:12:30 PM
Considering you are already fucked, you've got a pretty good start. I mean, just look in the mirror. If my dog had a head like yours, I'd shoot the bastard and put it out of it's misery.

No idea what that meant. I'm fucked? So you're gonna come and kick my butt? Oh please don't hurt me mr. internet tough guy.

210 henry mason way, jeffersonville indiana

 :zoinks:

What, the Jeffersonville Town Dump? Where they drop all the toxic waste and other shit? Why doesn't that surprise me?

Besides, I'd kick your 12 year old pimply arse from here to breakfast-time, you weedy little runt. Go get your father, he might be a better challenge. That's if you can get him off dialysis long enough.

 :pwned: :wanker:


He is out of your league trust me :laugh:

He's out of his fucking mind. He's just another internet wimp, a pansy. Go back into the closet with the rest of the poofters, you gutless fag.

I mean, really. The cunt can't even think up a name that can be pronounced. Ragebeoulve? sounds like someone about to toss their lunch.

But then again, your fanbase here must love you, considering the lovefest that this place is. Everyone creaming their knickers just to join in with their favourite 'wanker of the month'. If you can't chase people off by fucking with their minds, then you'll try any other shit. Like getting odourous to ban. How fucking frightening, to be ganged up on by a bunch of weak pissant schoolkids on a fucking forum? Christ, it's a pity none of you bastards had anything better to do.

If I din't think you were so serious, I'd be pissing myself laughing right now.

Come on, have a go you weak bastards.
Title: Re: Young Children
Post by: Adam on June 25, 2009, 06:14:37 PM
Go forward, for your motherland! For Jesus Christ motherfuckers, for Stalin you whores! :wanker:
Title: Re: Young Children
Post by: RageBeoulve on June 25, 2009, 06:15:11 PM
Considering you are already fucked, you've got a pretty good start. I mean, just look in the mirror. If my dog had a head like yours, I'd shoot the bastard and put it out of it's misery.

No idea what that meant. I'm fucked? So you're gonna come and kick my butt? Oh please don't hurt me mr. internet tough guy.

210 henry mason way, jeffersonville indiana

 :zoinks:

What, the Jeffersonville Town Dump? Where they drop all the toxic waste and other shit? Why doesn't that surprise me?

Besides, I'd kick your 12 year old pimply arse from here to breakfast-time, you weedy little runt. Go get your father, he might be a better challenge. That's if you can get him off dialysis long enough.

 :pwned: :wanker:


He is out of your league trust me :laugh:

He's out of his fucking mind. He just another internet wimp, a pansy. Go back into the closet with the rest of the poofters, you gutless fag.

I mean, really. The cunt can't even think up a name that can be pronounced. Ragebeoulve? sounds like someone about to toss their lunch.

But then again, your fanbse here must love you, considering the lovefest that this place is. If you can't chase people off by fucking with their minds, then you'll try any other shit. Like getting odourous to ban. How fucking frightening, to be ganged up on by a bunch of weak pissant schoolkids on a fucking forum? Christ, it's a pity none of you bastards had anything better to do.

If I din't think you were so serious, I'd be pissing myself laughing right now.

Come on, have a go you weak bastards.

Still whining? :orly:
Title: Re: Young Children
Post by: The_Chosen_One on June 26, 2009, 03:45:12 AM
No, just telling it like it is, you cumstain on the sheets of humanity.

Get a job, you loser. Handicapped organisations are screaming out for someone to hand out pamphlets.

Or maybe you could clean the shithouse at Maccas. Then again, you have trouble wiping your own arse, let alone someone else's mess.

Fucking internet tough guys... BULLSHIT!

I've dropped tougher turds than what I've seen here.
Title: Re: Young Children
Post by: Frolic_Fun on June 26, 2009, 04:20:19 AM
I love how spastics take the TOS *way* too literally.

I see no trouble with talking about it, but to post links/pictures/videos then you have an actual offense. It's not also like they're constantly monitoring this forum either. :violin:
Title: Re: Young Children
Post by: Phlexor on June 26, 2009, 04:20:55 AM
No, just telling it like it is, you cumstain on the sheets of humanity.

Get a job, you loser. Handicapped organisations are screaming out for someone to hand out pamphlets.

Or maybe you could clean the shithouse at Maccas. Then again, you have trouble wiping your own arse, let alone someone else's mess.

Fucking internet tough guys... BULLSHIT!

I've dropped tougher turds than what I've seen here.

Dude, it's seriously not working.  :laugh:
Title: Re: Young Children
Post by: renaeden on June 26, 2009, 06:10:02 AM
No, just telling it like it is, you cumstain on the sheets of humanity.

Get a job, you loser. Handicapped organisations are screaming out for someone to hand out pamphlets.

Or maybe you could clean the shithouse at Maccas. Then again, you have trouble wiping your own arse, let alone someone else's mess.

Fucking internet tough guys... BULLSHIT!

I've dropped tougher turds than what I've seen here.
I don't understand, why overreact so much? I thought the topic was discussed already. The Callout area is quiet...
Title: Re: Young Children
Post by: Pyraxis on June 26, 2009, 07:11:24 AM
They had it out in the shoutbox instead.
Title: Re: Young Children
Post by: RageBeoulve on June 26, 2009, 09:49:37 AM
You don't look very tough to me man.  :zoinks:
Title: Re: Young Children
Post by: Blasted on June 26, 2009, 10:14:11 AM
I love how spastics take the TOS *way* too literally.

I see no trouble with talking about it, but to post links/pictures/videos then you have an actual offense. It's not also like they're constantly monitoring this forum either. :violin:

Fair enough Shleed but this guy doesn't see the difference between child porn and regular porn.
Title: Re: Young Children
Post by: Frolic_Fun on June 26, 2009, 10:41:56 AM
I dunno if he actually posted child porn or not, if he did then he gets what he deserves. But if he didn't, by the looks of things they're making it look like he directed 20 child porn films, uploaded them to limewire and spunked on the monitor while looking at them. :zoinks:

EDIT: If it's loli manga shite, it's technically legal. At least here it is.
Title: Re: Young Children
Post by: Blasted on June 26, 2009, 10:53:25 AM
I dunno if he actually posted child porn or not, if he did then he gets what he deserves. But if he didn't, by the looks of things they're making it look like he directed 20 child porn films, uploaded them to limewire and spunked on the monitor while looking at them. :zoinks:


 :lol:

I didn't see the post myself.  He is still a dick though who claims that kids getting abused by adults  is the same thing as two consenting adults having sex. 
Title: Re: Young Children
Post by: RageBeoulve on June 26, 2009, 12:38:51 PM
I dunno if he actually posted child porn or not, if he did then he gets what he deserves. But if he didn't, by the looks of things they're making it look like he directed 20 child porn films, uploaded them to limewire and spunked on the monitor while looking at them. :zoinks:

EDIT: If it's loli manga shite, it's technically legal. At least here it is.

He said something about a loli manga site on zomg. That wasn't the case here. He lied.

I was here when he did it. :facepalm2:
Title: Re: Young Children
Post by: Christopher McCandless on June 26, 2009, 01:06:38 PM
I dunno if he actually posted child porn or not, if he did then he gets what he deserves. But if he didn't, by the looks of things they're making it look like he directed 20 child porn films, uploaded them to limewire and spunked on the monitor while looking at them. :zoinks:

EDIT: If it's loli manga shite, it's technically legal. At least here it is.
Technically against the TOS of Hostgator though :(
Title: Re: Young Children
Post by: odeon on June 26, 2009, 01:12:07 PM
Yes, that's right. I think that's what TCO doesn't understand--that we have a TOS to follow, in addition to the US law.
Title: Re: Young Children
Post by: Frolic_Fun on June 26, 2009, 01:40:00 PM
I dunno if he actually posted child porn or not, if he did then he gets what he deserves. But if he didn't, by the looks of things they're making it look like he directed 20 child porn films, uploaded them to limewire and spunked on the monitor while looking at them. :zoinks:

EDIT: If it's loli manga shite, it's technically legal. At least here it is.

He said something about a loli manga site on zomg. That wasn't the case here. He lied.

I was here when he did it. :facepalm2:

What did he post then?
Title: Re: Young Children
Post by: odeon on June 26, 2009, 01:42:09 PM
He wanted war stories from paedophiles. That's not against the US law but it's *defnitely* against Hostgator's TOS.
Title: Re: Young Children
Post by: RageBeoulve on June 26, 2009, 01:47:00 PM
He wanted war stories from paedophiles. That's not against the US law but it's *defnitely* against Hostgator's TOS.

That shows he was probably ashamed since he posted on another website after it was deleted, saying he said something else. I believe he said he posted about loli's and robot cocks? Well he lied. :thumbdn:
Title: Re: Young Children
Post by: Frolic_Fun on June 26, 2009, 01:50:35 PM
He wanted war stories from paedophiles. That's not against the US law but it's *defnitely* against Hostgator's TOS.

Wait what? That's it?

 :facepalm2:

Lit talks about banging underage girls all the time without much hassle, what makes this different then? It's obviously a humorous post without any serious intention, so it's not breaking the TOS in my view.
Title: Re: Young Children
Post by: RageBeoulve on June 26, 2009, 01:52:45 PM
He wanted war stories from paedophiles. That's not against the US law but it's *defnitely* against Hostgator's TOS.

Wait what? That's it?

 :facepalm2:

Lit talks about banging underage girls all the time without much hassle, what makes this different then? It's obviously a humorous post without any serious intention, so it's not breaking the TOS in my view.

He was too descriptive.

Besides, the chosen one took his place. I made him my bitch, but he's here trying to troll now. :zoinks:
Title: Re: Young Children
Post by: odeon on June 26, 2009, 03:46:14 PM
He wanted war stories from paedophiles. That's not against the US law but it's *defnitely* against Hostgator's TOS.

Wait what? That's it?

 :facepalm2:

Lit talks about banging underage girls all the time without much hassle, what makes this different then? It's obviously a humorous post without any serious intention, so it's not breaking the TOS in my view.


Lit's been quite specific about his girls being (at least) the age of consent in Sweden. There's plenty of posts where he points this out but AFAIK there's not a single post about him banging girls below that limit.

Amerikasend, however, specifically asked for stories about experiences concerning sex with *children* (I believe 11-yo's) which is *specifically* against the TOS because it promotes illegal activities (cp on an American server--any such story is), which in turn is against Hostgator's TOS. Please read http://www.hostgator.com/tos.shtml.

You should know that Hostgator is the sole arbiter whenever there is a disagreement. A quick Google search will give you ample evidence of their stance in similar matters in the past so you and anyone else can scream bloody murder if you want, without it actually changing anything else than the membership's attitude towards yourselves.

Any clearer yet?
Title: Re: Young Children
Post by: Frolic_Fun on June 26, 2009, 04:20:45 PM
Quote
It's obviously a humorous post without any serious intention, so it's not breaking the TOS in my view.
Title: Re: Young Children
Post by: RageBeoulve on June 26, 2009, 04:22:37 PM
Quote
It's obviously a humorous post without any serious intention, so it's not breaking the TOS in my view.

Who cares. Whats done is done and he's a fag anyway.
Title: Re: Young Children
Post by: Frolic_Fun on June 26, 2009, 04:36:18 PM
Meh, some people here just need to grow a fucking pair. :facepalm2:
Title: Re: Young Children
Post by: Adam on June 26, 2009, 04:38:46 PM
Everybody stfu , this shit is boring as bollocks now :thumbdn:
Title: Re: Young Children
Post by: Frolic_Fun on June 26, 2009, 04:44:16 PM
To you maybe, excellent drama for me. :P
Title: Re: Young Children
Post by: Adam on June 26, 2009, 04:53:34 PM
I think it had the potential for drama, but just gor boring apart from the stuff with TCO and about 5 mins at the start :thumbdn:
Title: Re: Young Children
Post by: Parts on June 26, 2009, 04:55:01 PM
like the bestiality he posted in the past he kept pushing till he got banned that's what he wanted anyway.  It's not so much the feel speech part just h would not of stopped till banned going further and further. Till he did post photos how hard is to to stop when asked and not just once  and agreed upon.  he lied and kept going therefor the ban. I don't want to babysit the board all the time in case he wants to get his kicks posting something really bad then reporting it the petty mother fucker.  He had one goal from the beginning to get banned follow his posts back.   Other site have been banned for such things look up live journal and yahoo groups
Title: Re: Young Children
Post by: RageBeoulve on June 26, 2009, 05:25:14 PM
To you maybe, excellent drama for me. :P

Thing is, we don't have time for his kind. Who cares about that fag? He's gone.
Title: Re: Young Children
Post by: Pyraxis on June 26, 2009, 05:59:41 PM
like the bestiality he posted in the past he kept pushing till he got banned that's what he wanted anyway.  It's not so much the feel speech part just h would not of stopped till banned going further and further.

QFT
Title: Re: Young Children
Post by: Frolic_Fun on June 26, 2009, 06:15:36 PM
To you maybe, excellent drama for me. :P

Thing is, we don't have time for his kind. Who cares about that fag? He's gone.

If you lot didn't have time for him, it took an awful amount of posts and time to ban him.
Title: Re: Young Children
Post by: RageBeoulve on June 26, 2009, 06:22:20 PM
To you maybe, excellent drama for me. :P

Thing is, we don't have time for his kind. Who cares about that fag? He's gone.

If you lot didn't have time for him, it took an awful amount of posts and time to ban him.

Got rid of him though didn't I? :zoinks:

Even though it took some time temporarily to lead him into getting himself banned, it was well worth it, because now he's gone. Thats the difference. I never give up on anything I do, and I fucking win.  :eyebrows:
Title: Re: Young Children
Post by: Parts on June 26, 2009, 06:32:19 PM
I believe it was a set up post something then report a complaint that begings a whole new set shitload of
trouble it would not have stopped till he was banned read zomg
Title: Re: Young Children
Post by: RageBeoulve on June 26, 2009, 07:06:48 PM
I believe it was a set up post something then report a complaint that begings a whole new set shitload of
trouble it would not have stopped till he was banned read zomg

Nah dude I egged him on. I wanted him gone, so I gave him shit until he pushed it too far. Sorry, but I didn't like him. And I make things happen when I want them to. :lol:
Title: Re: Young Children
Post by: Parts on June 26, 2009, 07:11:00 PM
To you maybe, excellent drama for me. :P

Thing is, we don't have time for his kind. Who cares about that fag? He's gone.

If you lot didn't have time for him, it took an awful amount of posts and time to ban him.


I like to give every one a fair chance you have to prove to me you  are  a douche 
Title: Re: Young Children
Post by: Adam on June 26, 2009, 07:18:31 PM
We already know Shleed is a douche though  :lol:
Title: Re: Young Children
Post by: Frolic_Fun on June 26, 2009, 07:29:44 PM
Oh well, can't be arsed to moan because people don't agree with me, unlike TCO. I just find the whole situation a major overreaction, like when that eejit was banned for holocaust denial. I couldn't care less if it conflicts with the TOS at all, I made forums that really went against TOS and they were still up until I decided to get bored and shut them down myself.
Title: Re: Young Children
Post by: Pyraxis on June 26, 2009, 07:35:14 PM
But on the flip side, GA succeeded at one point at getting Pea's site shut down for TOS issues out of sheer vindictiveness. If the eejit trolls decided to use that kind of tactics against us, and we hadn't been careful about TOS, we'd be kinda fucked.
Title: Re: Young Children
Post by: Frolic_Fun on June 26, 2009, 07:41:27 PM
GA contacted the host and moaned like a fucking child about it, trolls like buttcoffee don't seem to bother. They just want to get banned and laugh, they usually couldn't care less about shutting down any forums. The host doesn't constantly check on this forum when we're not looking and only will if someone complained directly to them.

The TOS can be interpreted in many different ways, it's not exactly black and white. How odeon views the TOS and how the host views the TOS could be completely different.
Title: Re: Young Children
Post by: Parts on June 26, 2009, 07:42:27 PM
Oh well, can't be arsed to moan because people don't agree with me, unlike TCO. I just find the whole situation a major overreaction, like when that eejit was banned for holocaust denial. I couldn't care less if it conflicts with the TOS at all, I made forums that really went against TOS and they were still up until I decided to get bored and shut them down myself.

You are not a douche and have valid concerns about the running of the site when we feel it is treading on ify ground decisions have to be made to preserve the sit in it's current form that is the goal of all this b a bit here and there is one thing but threads dedicated to it are another.  He would have continued till he was banned for something
Title: Re: Young Children
Post by: Christopher McCandless on June 26, 2009, 07:43:53 PM
But on the flip side, GA succeeded at one point at getting Pea's site shut down for TOS issues out of sheer vindictiveness. If the eejit trolls decided to use that kind of tactics against us, and we hadn't been careful about TOS, we'd be kinda fucked.
P did get a warning though first.
Title: Re: Young Children
Post by: The_Chosen_One on June 26, 2009, 11:23:03 PM
To you maybe, excellent drama for me. :P

Thing is, we don't have time for his kind. Who cares about that fag? He's gone.

If you lot didn't have time for him, it took an awful amount of posts and time to ban him.

Got rid of him though didn't I? :zoinks:

Even though it took some time temporarily to lead him into getting himself banned, it was well worth it, because now he's gone. Thats the difference. I never give up on anything I do, and I fucking win.  :eyebrows:

Bullshit. Yer ego is bigger than yer dick. Shleed is right, a lot of wankers falling over themselves about what some 'tard said. Maybe he was right, and you assholes actually DO fuck kids.

Big fucking joke, and you cunts were taken to the cleaners. Well done!

Fucking priceless.
Title: Re: Young Children
Post by: Phlexor on June 27, 2009, 06:56:24 AM
To you maybe, excellent drama for me. :P

Thing is, we don't have time for his kind. Who cares about that fag? He's gone.

If you lot didn't have time for him, it took an awful amount of posts and time to ban him.

Got rid of him though didn't I? :zoinks:

Even though it took some time temporarily to lead him into getting himself banned, it was well worth it, because now he's gone. Thats the difference. I never give up on anything I do, and I fucking win.  :eyebrows:

Bullshit. Yer ego is bigger than yer dick. Shleed is right, a lot of wankers falling over themselves about what some 'tard said. Maybe he was right, and you assholes actually DO fuck kids.

Big fucking joke, and you cunts were taken to the cleaners. Well done!

Fucking priceless.

??? What? Do you read and see what goes on here or do just make up in interesting story in your head then post?
Title: Re: Young Children
Post by: odeon on June 27, 2009, 08:11:14 AM
Oh well, can't be arsed to moan because people don't agree with me, unlike TCO. I just find the whole situation a major overreaction, like when that eejit was banned for holocaust denial. I couldn't care less if it conflicts with the TOS at all, I made forums that really went against TOS and they were still up until I decided to get bored and shut them down myself.

The Holocaust denier is not banned. He never was. Get your facts straight if you must whine. :finger:
Title: Re: Young Children
Post by: odeon on June 27, 2009, 08:12:57 AM
GA contacted the host and moaned like a fucking child about it, trolls like buttcoffee don't seem to bother. They just want to get banned and laugh, they usually couldn't care less about shutting down any forums. The host doesn't constantly check on this forum when we're not looking and only will if someone complained directly to them.

The TOS can be interpreted in many different ways, it's not exactly black and white. How odeon views the TOS and how the host views the TOS could be completely different.

Which is why I had a look on teh Internets how they'd behaved in the past. For someone who doesn't care, you post a lot about it.
Title: Re: Young Children
Post by: Frolic_Fun on June 27, 2009, 08:27:10 AM
I obviously care enough about the topic to type about it yes, but I don't care if people disagree with me. I'm not whining, just sharing my views on this topic. Since when is giving an opinion different to yours whinging anyway?

Calm down you bloody Finn eejit. :zoinks:

EDIT: I'm just going by what I heard about that guy over the whole holocaust denial thing. He may not have been banned, but he was reported to his ISP, which I do find a bit silly.
Title: Re: Young Children
Post by: Blasted on June 27, 2009, 08:30:29 AM
Shleed is not a douche  8)
Title: Re: Young Children
Post by: odeon on June 27, 2009, 08:42:53 AM
I obviously care enough about the topic to type about it yes, but I don't care if people disagree with me. I'm not whining, just sharing my views on this topic. Since when is giving an opinion different to yours whinging anyway?

Since I defined it like that. :orly:

Quote

Calm down you bloody Finn eejit. :zoinks:

EDIT: I'm just going by what I heard about that guy over the whole holocaust denial thing. He may not have been banned, but he was reported to his ISP, which I do find a bit silly.

Fair enough. /shrugs

I do find it amusing that the end result of us (meaning the staff) doing all these things is that people like TCO can go on whining.
Title: Re: Young Children
Post by: Frolic_Fun on June 27, 2009, 08:43:58 AM
I do it because I love drama. :eyelash:

*runs around like a gender confused aussie*
Title: Re: Young Children
Post by: RageBeoulve on June 27, 2009, 09:08:58 AM
To you maybe, excellent drama for me. :P

Thing is, we don't have time for his kind. Who cares about that fag? He's gone.

If you lot didn't have time for him, it took an awful amount of posts and time to ban him.

Got rid of him though didn't I? :zoinks:

Even though it took some time temporarily to lead him into getting himself banned, it was well worth it, because now he's gone. Thats the difference. I never give up on anything I do, and I fucking win.  :eyebrows:

Bullshit. Yer ego is bigger than yer dick. Shleed is right, a lot of wankers falling over themselves about what some 'tard said. Maybe he was right, and you assholes actually DO fuck kids.

Big fucking joke, and you cunts were taken to the cleaners. Well done!

Fucking priceless.

Keep trying, old man.
Title: Re: Young Children
Post by: The_Chosen_One on June 27, 2009, 11:12:29 AM
To you maybe, excellent drama for me. :P

Thing is, we don't have time for his kind. Who cares about that fag? He's gone.

If you lot didn't have time for him, it took an awful amount of posts and time to ban him.

Got rid of him though didn't I? :zoinks:

Even though it took some time temporarily to lead him into getting himself banned, it was well worth it, because now he's gone. Thats the difference. I never give up on anything I do, and I fucking win.  :eyebrows:

Bullshit. Yer ego is bigger than yer dick. Shleed is right, a lot of wankers falling over themselves about what some 'tard said. Maybe he was right, and you assholes actually DO fuck kids.

Big fucking joke, and you cunts were taken to the cleaners. Well done!

Fucking priceless.

Keep trying, old man.

Hey, if that's you in that picture, then you're one fuckin' ugly kid. Michael Jackson would have loved you. Still, George Michael is available, I hear he likes kids like you.
Title: Re: Young Children
Post by: RageBeoulve on June 27, 2009, 11:24:56 AM
To you maybe, excellent drama for me. :P

Thing is, we don't have time for his kind. Who cares about that fag? He's gone.

If you lot didn't have time for him, it took an awful amount of posts and time to ban him.

Got rid of him though didn't I? :zoinks:

Even though it took some time temporarily to lead him into getting himself banned, it was well worth it, because now he's gone. Thats the difference. I never give up on anything I do, and I fucking win.  :eyebrows:

Bullshit. Yer ego is bigger than yer dick. Shleed is right, a lot of wankers falling over themselves about what some 'tard said. Maybe he was right, and you assholes actually DO fuck kids.

Big fucking joke, and you cunts were taken to the cleaners. Well done!

Fucking priceless.

Keep trying, old man.

Hey, if that's you in that picture, then you're one fuckin' ugly kid. Michael Jackson would have loved you. Still, George Michael is available, I hear he likes kids like you.

Nice try. Hey you wanna post both our pics on hot or not and see who gets a higher rating? Bet you'll lose. :eyebrows:
Title: Re: Young Children
Post by: Leto729 on June 29, 2009, 07:31:18 PM
17 pages OMG.
Title: Re: Young Children
Post by: Calandale on June 29, 2009, 10:23:08 PM
I prefer older children.
Title: Re: Young Children
Post by: RageBeoulve on June 30, 2009, 07:05:30 AM
I prefer older children.

I prefer women.
Title: Re: Young Children
Post by: Frolic_Fun on June 30, 2009, 07:12:11 AM
I don't see the attraction in teens/children really, they're the most moronic bunch of shits you can ever come across. Children are loud, annoying, whingy leeching pieces of shit and teens too are loud, annoying, whingy leeching pieces of shit but far more pretentious.
Title: Re: Young Children
Post by: Adam on June 30, 2009, 10:13:31 AM
Kids are funny once they're old enough to talk. They can be cute too. babies are fucking boring and pointless though.

And teenagers are absolute bastards.

I don't want to have sex with any of the above though  :orly:
Title: Re: Young Children
Post by: RageBeoulve on June 30, 2009, 11:20:16 AM
Kids are funny once they're old enough to talk. They can be cute too. babies are fucking boring and pointless though.

And teenagers are absolute bastards.

I don't want to have sex with any of the above though  :orly:

Shleed is saying that you're already messed up in the head if you like to fuck kids, but if you actually form a sexual relationship with one somehow... and the relationship works.. you are seriously unbalanced and should kill yourself immediately.
Title: Re: Young Children
Post by: Calandale on June 30, 2009, 07:41:01 PM
I find that those worth ever having,
seem to be fine, by their mid-teens.

What they were before, I really don't know.

Those not, never were, and never will be.