INTENSITY²
Start here => What is Intensity²? => Topic started by: Walkie on September 12, 2016, 11:48:41 AM
-
OK, I've been around for aaaaages on -and-off, but suddenly, when I really need to know , I can neither recall nor figure out which bits of this board are hidden from non-members? It's the submissions sub-forum that interests me in particular right now, but it's worth asking as a general question for future reference.
To be a bit more specific: suppose I post exerpts from an unpublished (and even unfinished) book there, I don't think that counts as "publication" not if it's "members only". I might be wrong about that though. Clarification on either point, from anybody in the know, would be welcome
Thanks,
-Walkie
-
Visit the site without logging in. Whatever is visible is public.
-
I thought of that, Jack. But I've been and gone and set it so i'm perrmanently logged in :LOL:
-
These are the public boards:
What is Intensity²?
Child Boards: The Sophist Method, Disclaimer, 10 principles, How To...
Free For ALL
M.O.-Introductions
Child Boards: Ask Away Threads
What's your crime? Basic Discussion
Games
Political Pundits
Main Event Callouts
-
cheers! That's more like it. Now, I wonder if Admin might consider making some notes to that effect on the index?
-walkie :)
-
Could post the suggestion in the forum: Site Direction.
-
Some of the boards already say, members hidden; not sure why they aren't all noted.
-
The only hidden board that isn't marked as members, is AS Advocacy. The whole section, Continue Here: members of the community, is for members of the community, so that's clear enough. The Management section is also members only. Everything else is clear enough, so maybe only AS Advocacy needs to be marked as members only.
-
Could post the suggestion in the forum: Site Direction.
Bugger that. He reads everything else, doesn't he? Even the mind-numbingly tedious arguments! Is he gonna pretend to not notice it here. just to keep things tidy?
:pondering:
(The above represents my pathetic attempt to find a particularly useful icon that i swear we used to have . Don't say it's been barged aside by Donald Freaking Trump. The man was beyond the pale already )
-
Some of the boards already say, members hidden; not sure why they aren't all noted.
You might not believe this, Jack, but I find the term "members hidden" ambiguous. Especially round here :LOL:
-
:pondering:
(The above represents my pathetic attempt to find a particularly useful icon that i swear we used to have .
:scratchhead: :hmmm: :chin: :nerd!:
-
Some of the boards already say, members hidden; not sure why they aren't all noted.
You might not believe this, Jack, but I find the term "members hidden" ambiguous. Especially round here :LOL:
:laugh:
-
But I've been and gone and set it so i'm perrmanently logged in :LOL:
That's good, now you'll be trapped here forever. :zoinks:
-
In 5 more posts, you can become an elder and have access to the most private board here.
Just spam senseless shit like the rest of us do.
-
OMG SENSELESS SHIT!! :GA:
-
In 5 more posts, you can become an elder and have access to the most private board here.
Just spam senseless shit like the rest of us do.
Not that old chestnut, again Scrappy.
I already have access. Have had access for years but I'm honourably resisting spying on you guys, cos some asshole (and can't recall which one, I really can't) started a drama about my premature admission.
Hopefully that drama died down. Ooh well it must have , cos nobody notices I have da title anymore, let alone recalling the drama.
Anyways, another 2 posts, and I officially stop sulking about it. :)
-
In my opinion, what counts as published is what the lawyers can get away with attacking. It's so heavily dependent on whether the publisher or owner of the copyright for the media is litigious. If it's a traditional publisher... will they care enough to look? What will they use to search, your name, portions of the text? Is the place where you posted it googleable? That matters so much more than the "official" definition of is it available on the internet. As far as I could tell from researching it once, if it was on a blog even if set to private, it counted as published by the letter of the definition. But they shouldn't find that.
-
In my opinion, what counts as published is what the lawyers can get away with attacking. It's so heavily dependent on whether the publisher or owner of the copyright for the media is litigious. If it's a traditional publisher... will they care enough to look? What will they use to search, your name, portions of the text? Is the place where you posted it googleable? That matters so much more than the "official" definition of is it available on the internet. As far as I could tell from researching it once, if it was on a blog even if set to private, it counted as published by the letter of the definition. But they shouldn't find that.
Ooooo . The Gods of this board have granted me an intelligent , informative reply :worship: Thanks, Pyraxis :)
It's my own shit ofc so I wouldn't seriously anticipate any issues, but I'm an Aspie, right? I like to know where I stand.
Now, will you all stop tempting me to make that final post and hit 500?
I've got rather attached to my anomaly by now
-Walkie
(outcast Elder, bravely wandering the perilous jungles beyond the safe refuge of the Eder's Forum )
-
I'd sooner question your dubious taste in posting any of it in this cesspit. :LOL:
-
Don't count on privacy, though. Just sayin'.
-
I'd sooner question your dubious taste in posting any of it in this cesspit. :LOL:
and a highly valid question it would be :LOL:
let's just say i'm reckless, hmm...but , hang on, not completely and utterly reckless. You notice I'm not actually doing as yet (if ever), just mulling it over.
-
In my opinion, what counts as published is what the lawyers can get away with attacking. It's so heavily dependent on whether the publisher or owner of the copyright for the media is litigious. If it's a traditional publisher... will they care enough to look? What will they use to search, your name, portions of the text? Is the place where you posted it googleable? That matters so much more than the "official" definition of is it available on the internet. As far as I could tell from researching it once, if it was on a blog even if set to private, it counted as published by the letter of the definition. But they shouldn't find that.
:MLA:
Published means transmitted from one person to another with the intent that the other person receives the information. Even an email will qualify as publication, under most state statutes regarding defamation.
Is someone going to defame someone?
:popcorn:
-
Yes. :zoinks:
-
:MLA:
Published means transmitted from one person to another with the intent that the other person receives the information. Even an email will qualify as publication, under most state statutes regarding defamation.
Is someone going to defame someone?
:popcorn:
Always. But not me :angel:.
I have my own dumbass reasons, and don't really anticipate legal action or anything like that. Sorry to disappoint.
-
Published means transmitted from one person to another with the intent that the other person receives the information. Even an email will qualify as publication, under most state statutes regarding defamation.
Is someone going to defame someone?
:popcorn:
It's about copyright, not defamation. As in some publishers having a clause about right of first publication, ie they will not publish a work that has been published prior.
-
and once again Pyraxis deftly bursts all the pretty bubbles >:D
-
Published means transmitted from one person to another with the intent that the other person receives the information. Even an email will qualify as publication, under most state statutes regarding defamation.
Is someone going to defame someone?
:popcorn:
It's about copyright, not defamation. As in some publishers having a clause about right of first publication, ie they will not publish a work that has been published prior.
How can you tell why he is asking? I can't suss it out from this thread.
And defamation is more fun :zoinks:
-
Published means transmitted from one person to another with the intent that the other person receives the information. Even an email will qualify as publication, under most state statutes regarding defamation.
Is someone going to defame someone?
:popcorn:
It's about copyright, not defamation. As in some publishers having a clause about right of first publication, ie they will not publish a work that has been published prior.
How can you tell why he is asking? I can't suss it out from this thread.
And defamation is more fun :zoinks:
Yeah, I know defamation is more fun . That why I said sorry to disppoint (or whatever I said)
And who is the "he" of whom you speak? If you mean me, wrong gender. In which case , the answer to your question would be that Intensity isn't the only mode of communication between Spazzes , ya know? (and thank goodness)
-
Published means transmitted from one person to another with the intent that the other person receives the information. Even an email will qualify as publication, under most state statutes regarding defamation.
Is someone going to defame someone?
:popcorn:
It's about copyright, not defamation. As in some publishers having a clause about right of first publication, ie they will not publish a work that has been published prior.
How can you tell why he is asking? I can't suss it out from this thread.
And defamation is more fun :zoinks:
Yeah, I know defamation is more fun . That why I said sorry to disppoint (or whatever I said)
And who is the "he" of whom you speak? If you mean me, wrong gender. In which case , the answer to your question would be that Intensity isn't the only mode of communication between Spazzes , ya know? (and thank goodness)
But Spazzes do get that other spazzes can't follow .... oh never mind. :asthing:
-
How can you tell why he is asking? I can't suss it out from this thread.
It's in the OP.
-
Also I had talked to Walkie about stuff related to this via email before she brought it up here.
-
How can you tell why he is asking? I can't suss it out from this thread.
It's in the OP.
But Hoobert is the greatest lawyer EVAAAARRR!!! :tard: