INTENSITY²

Arena for the Competitive => Main Event Callouts => Topic started by: Blasted on December 16, 2009, 06:06:48 AM

Title: Callaway
Post by: Blasted on December 16, 2009, 06:06:48 AM
I call out Callaway for being sneaky and not brave enough to disagree with someone openly  8)
Title: Re: Callaway
Post by: Christopher McCandless on December 16, 2009, 06:33:17 AM
Go on...
Title: Re: Callaway
Post by: Al Swearegen on December 16, 2009, 06:48:42 AM
Ooopppsie. Bint has broken into her Mum's medication cabinet and scoffed too many crazy pills. OK check vital signs now everyone. See if they change.

Maybe she will cop an even break though. I mean she had to try this shit just after Callaway had surgery but even still.....
Title: Re: Callaway
Post by: Adam on December 16, 2009, 07:07:05 AM
get out of the callout, faggot  :zoinks:
Title: Re: Callaway
Post by: Blasted on December 16, 2009, 07:40:10 AM
Yeah, this does not involve you Sir Les, hop it  :zoinks:
Title: Re: Callaway
Post by: Phlexor on December 16, 2009, 10:35:25 AM
Trawling my karma. Read and weep bitches!  :green:
Title: Re: Callaway
Post by: Blasted on December 16, 2009, 11:01:11 AM
I thought you'd get emo over that  :zoinks:
Title: Re: Callaway
Post by: Phlexor on December 16, 2009, 11:06:19 AM
I thought you'd get emo over that  :zoinks:


I see all that crying you are doing is making you delusional again.

So fucking funny  :laugh:
Title: Re: Callaway
Post by: Blasted on December 16, 2009, 11:10:29 AM
Crying?   :toporly:

It is hilarious how easy you guys are to annoy, I agree.

Title: Re: Callaway
Post by: Phlexor on December 16, 2009, 11:18:40 AM
Crying?   :toporly:

It is hilarious how easy you guys are to annoy, I agree.



So that's yes then  :violin:
Title: Re: Callaway
Post by: Blasted on December 16, 2009, 11:29:42 AM
No fatso, stop trying to project your feelings of inadequacy onto me  :lolhit:

Title: Re: Callaway
Post by: Phlexor on December 16, 2009, 11:32:25 AM
No fatso, stop trying to project your feelings of inadequacy onto me  :lolhit:



I hope you have enough tissues there...
Title: Re: Callaway
Post by: Blasted on December 16, 2009, 11:36:20 AM
Sorry you're not funny enough for me to be crying with laughter (emo)
Title: Re: Callaway
Post by: RageBeoulve on December 16, 2009, 01:58:43 PM
Christ bint thats enough. Whats the fucking deal here? :zombiefuck:
Title: Re: Callaway
Post by: Callaway on December 16, 2009, 02:17:15 PM
What's your problem with me, Bint?

My problem with you is that you shit all over people who used to be your friends.
Title: Re: Callaway
Post by: Frolic_Fun on December 16, 2009, 03:44:28 PM
When it comes to friends, I have to admit there's shit flung within both sides.
Title: Re: Callaway
Post by: Callaway on December 16, 2009, 04:22:15 PM
To some extent, I agree with you Shleed.  I believe it's possible that some of her friends have thrown a lot of shit at her and I just haven't noticed, but I haven't seen you throw shit at her to the same extent I have seen her throw it at you.

To me, she seems to cut off her friends too easily over relatively minor issues.

Title: Re: Callaway
Post by: Frolic_Fun on December 16, 2009, 04:35:29 PM
That last bit I have to agree with. Simple political differences can be sometimes enough or with my case, pointing out the fact that BPD people are trainwrecks in a humorous manner.
Title: Re: Callaway
Post by: Scrapheap on December 16, 2009, 05:59:51 PM
At this point, I don't think I'd cross the street to piss on Bint if she was on fire.  :wanker: :yawn: :zzz:


edit: or Soph for that matter.
Title: Re: Callaway
Post by: Blasted on December 17, 2009, 03:34:09 AM
What's your problem with me, Bint?

My problem with you is that you shit all over people who used to be your friends.

My problem is that you prefer to stay schtum about things that annoy you and instead use karma to say what you truly think.  Now, I think that's cowardly as hell so I'm calling you out on it.

Which ex-friends do I shit all over exactly?  You know fuck all about my friendship with Shleed and why I'm not friends with him anymore.  Nor do I think my friendships are any of your business to be honest but if my behaviour is so despicable towards my friends then I want you to give me proof.  Use those dossier skills of yours and show me exactly who and how I shat all over please  ;)

Title: Re: Callaway
Post by: Blasted on December 17, 2009, 03:38:02 AM
Also, get the fuck out of my callout dickheads  :zoinks:
Title: Re: Callaway
Post by: renaeden on December 17, 2009, 06:40:27 AM
We can contribute here but if you move your callout the to Main Event, then we have to stay out of there.
Title: Re: Callaway
Post by: Blasted on December 17, 2009, 06:43:11 AM
Ah, forgot how this works.  Funny how no one told Sir Les this when he tried to chuck me or Soph out of other callouts before.
Title: Re: Callaway
Post by: Al Swearegen on December 17, 2009, 06:59:33 AM
Yes it is Sir Les' fault. Keep avoiding responsibility. Shit for Brains.
Title: Re: Callaway
Post by: Blasted on December 17, 2009, 07:12:01 AM
Responsibility for what exactly?  I was only making an observation.  I know my brains are so superior to yours that you felt the need to capitalise the 'B' when referring to them.  Don't worry Les, I do pity your predicament greatly.  Really.
Title: Re: Callaway
Post by: Adam on December 17, 2009, 11:26:03 AM
Responsibility? rofl wtf

We told you to fuck off out of here because you'd rpeviously told US to fuck off out of a call out thread.

God you have got to be one of the most retarded members on this site
Title: Re: Callaway
Post by: Scrapheap on December 17, 2009, 01:27:59 PM
My problem is that you prefer to stay schtum about things that annoy you and instead use karma to say what you truly think. 

:LMAO::rofl::rofl::rofl::rofl:

...and the winner for the Biggest Hypocrite in the Universe goes to...  :borg: The BintySoph Borg Collective!!!   :congrats:
Title: Re: Callaway
Post by: odeon on December 17, 2009, 02:11:51 PM
You really should move this to the main callout area.
Title: Re: Callaway
Post by: Blasted on December 17, 2009, 02:21:29 PM
My problem is that you prefer to stay schtum about things that annoy you and instead use karma to say what you truly think.  

:LMAO::rofl::rofl::rofl::rofl:

...and the winner for the Biggest Hypocrite in the Universe goes to...  :borg: The BintySoph Borg Collective!!!   :congrats:

Still ignoring my posts very well I see   :lolhit:

I think I made it abundantly clear many a time that I think you're a twat, on the forum itself.
Title: Re: Callaway
Post by: Scrapheap on December 17, 2009, 03:44:37 PM
I think I made it abundantly clear many a time that I think you're a twat,

The next time you have a "thought"... just let it go.  :lol:

 :pwned:
Title: Re: Callaway
Post by: Blasted on December 17, 2009, 03:46:19 PM
Why do you have me on ignore if you still read my posts and answer to threads I make  :zoinks:

Pathetic you are.
Title: Re: Callaway
Post by: Frolic_Fun on December 17, 2009, 04:00:59 PM
Scatheap, why bother when you're going to be a useless cowardly cunt?

Bint's harmless and fun to annoy, so why put her on ignore? :laugh:
Title: Re: Callaway
Post by: Scrapheap on December 17, 2009, 04:15:16 PM
Scatheap, why bother when you're going to be a useless cowardly cunt?

Bint's harmless and fun to annoy, so why put her on ignore? :laugh:

Because she's more annoying, than annoyable. Not worth the effort. :jaded:
Title: Re: Callaway
Post by: Adam on December 17, 2009, 04:18:02 PM
My problem is that you prefer to stay schtum about things that annoy you and instead use karma to say what you truly think. 

:LMAO::rofl::rofl::rofl::rofl:

...and the winner for the Biggest Hypocrite in the Universe goes to...  :borg: The BintySoph Borg Collective!!!   :congrats:

No. Do you ever know what a hypocrte is? We ghey YOU if we think you are being an ass. And we make it perfectly clear if we disagree with siomone. If you re-read what she said, I think you'll see that you've just made yourself look pretty stupid (again)
Title: Re: Callaway
Post by: Scrapheap on December 17, 2009, 04:27:16 PM
We ghey YOU if we think you are being an ass.

  :lies: :lies: :lies: :lies: :lies: :lies: :lies: :lies: :lies: :lies: :lies: :lies: :lies: :lies: :lies: :lies: :lies: :lies: :fos: :fos: :fos: :fos: :fos: :fos: :fos: :fos: :fos: :fos: :fos: :fos: :fos: :fos: :fos: :fos: :fos: :fos: :fos: :fos: :fos: :fos: :fos: :fos: :fos: :fos:

SOPH, YOU ARE A PISS POOR LIAR!!!

I welcome ANYONE to take a look at the karma thrashing campaign the BintySoph Borg Collective did against me. I was gheyed for no reason, WHEN I WASN'T EVEN POSTING!!!
Title: Re: Callaway
Post by: Christopher McCandless on December 17, 2009, 04:43:48 PM
Why do you have me on ignore if you still read my posts and answer to threads I make  :zoinks:

Pathetic you are.
Pathetic that you care, really...
Title: Re: Callaway
Post by: Callaway on December 17, 2009, 05:02:21 PM


I welcome ANYONE to take a look at the karma thrashing campaign the BintySoph Borg Collective did against me. I was gheyed for no reason, WHEN I WASN'T EVEN POSTING!!!

You certainly have gotten a lot of minuses from Bint and Soph lately, so many that the people plussing you have trouble keeping up.
Title: Re: Callaway
Post by: Callaway on December 17, 2009, 05:04:19 PM
What's your problem with me, Bint?

My problem with you is that you shit all over people who used to be your friends.

My problem is that you prefer to stay schtum about things that annoy you and instead use karma to say what you truly think.  Now, I think that's cowardly as hell so I'm calling you out on it.

Which ex-friends do I shit all over exactly?  You know fuck all about my friendship with Shleed and why I'm not friends with him anymore.  Nor do I think my friendships are any of your business to be honest but if my behaviour is so despicable towards my friends then I want you to give me proof.  Use those dossier skills of yours and show me exactly who and how I shat all over please  ;)




So you think that my use of karma is your business but the way you treat your friends here is none of my business?

I think that your treatment of your friends here is my business just as much as my use of karma is yours.

I guess I have unconsciously gone a little easier on you in the past than I might have because I still like you and I don't want to feel responsible for you in case you do something to harm yourself again, but since you asked here's what I think.

I think what you did to TheOtherWindow was particularly shitty.  You should already know what you did, but if you really want me to provide details, then here goes. You "fell out" with TOW for a ridiculous reason, which left him feeling hurt and bewildered.  I think your "reason" was something stupid like he was too busy to listen to you rant one night.  I used my dossier skills, but I think you edited out the post with your "reason" for cutting off your good friend.  I believe that you finally wound up apologizing, but doing stuff like this leaves a mark that's difficult to erase with just an "I'm sorry" and I haven't seen him back here much lately.

I think you tend to "fall out" with some of your friends for relatively minor reasons.  You certainly aren't perfect yourself, so how can you expect your friends to be?  Then you turn around and complain that you can't keep friends.  "I hate the way I cannot keep people.  I also hate feeling alone.  Tis the primary reason why I am so often here."

I think the way you keep trying to insult Shleed and Phlexor over their weight is cruel and childish.  There are several people here who have a loved one who is at least a little overweight and I think remarks like this probably bother them as much or more than they bother Phlexor and Shleed.  Also, I think if someone made similar remarks to you, you would probably would take it very much to heart and you probably would not eat for days, or if you did, you would probably make yourself vomit or abuse laxatives to lose some weight.

It's true that I don't always take the time to make another post agreeing with what someone says, so sometimes I plus them because I agree with what they said.  Sometimes I plus them because I sympathize with something they're going through and sometimes I plus them because I think their post is funny, cute, insightful, or well-written.  It's also true that I don't minus people often, but I do sometimes if I think they are being particularly obnoxious.

You really don't seem to handle any sort of criticism well.  When I told you that your smoking was more likely to cause early heart disease than a few extra pounds, here was your response to me:  "well i hope u get the bubonic plague and die too"


Title: Re: Callaway
Post by: Frolic_Fun on December 17, 2009, 05:13:02 PM
She can take the piss out of my fatness as much as shle likes, but what I don't get is that she cries just like Phlextor if people take the piss out of skinnies. Take the piss out of both or just not bother, in my opinion.

She fell out with TCO? News to me. She never mentioned this.
Title: Re: Callaway
Post by: Callaway on December 17, 2009, 05:17:28 PM
She can take the piss out of my fatness as much as shle likes, but what I don't get is that she cries just like Phlextor if people take the piss out of skinnies. Take the piss out of both or just not bother, in my opinion.

She fell out with TCO? News to me. She never mentioned this.

She picked a stupid fight with him and cut him off some time ago.  She started a thread about it, but deleted most of her posts from it.  Then she apologized later.  She started a happy birthday thread for him a few days ago, but I don't think he has been here for weeks.
Title: Re: Callaway
Post by: 'andersom' on December 17, 2009, 05:19:03 PM
Confusion entering.

TOW or TCO?
Title: Re: Callaway
Post by: Frolic_Fun on December 17, 2009, 05:20:52 PM
TOW I meant, not TCO. Over what?

Why does she bother trying to act mature and stick to the moral highground when in reality she goes just as low? There's a usual cycle to her arguments:

10 Makes preachy post about some liberal bullshit.
20 If person disagrees, go to 30. If not, go back to 10.
30 Says you're wrong and you're dumb for having a different opinion.
40 If person diagrees again, go to 50. If not, go back to 10.
50 Keeps on saying the person is dumb, without explaining on why she thinks the person is wrong. Flings childish insults and ad homs.
60 If person reponds in any form, loop 50. If not, go to 70.
70 RETURN TO 10
Title: Re: Callaway
Post by: Callaway on December 17, 2009, 05:56:49 PM
TOW I meant, not TCO. Over what?


IIRC, he didn't have time to listen to her one time when she wanted him to.
Title: Re: Callaway
Post by: Adam on December 17, 2009, 06:01:48 PM
We ghey YOU if we think you are being an ass.

  :lies: :lies: :lies: :lies: :lies: :lies: :lies: :lies: :lies: :lies: :lies: :lies: :lies: :lies: :lies: :lies: :lies: :lies: :fos: :fos: :fos: :fos: :fos: :fos: :fos: :fos: :fos: :fos: :fos: :fos: :fos: :fos: :fos: :fos: :fos: :fos: :fos: :fos: :fos: :fos: :fos: :fos: :fos: :fos:

SOPH, YOU ARE A PISS POOR LIAR!!!

I welcome ANYONE to take a look at the karma thrashing campaign the BintySoph Borg Collective did against me. I was gheyed for no reason, WHEN I WASN'T EVEN POSTING!!!

god you're retarded. The point is that we were gheying YOU. not yaying someone you were arguing with because we didn't have the guts to tell you we thought you were an ass to your face.  :duh:
Title: Re: Callaway
Post by: Adam on December 17, 2009, 06:03:16 PM
Why do you have me on ignore if you still read my posts and answer to threads I make  :zoinks:

Pathetic you are.
Pathetic that you care, really...

She cares?

In which case, it's pathetic that you care so much too. I mean, you're responding, so obviously you care (using hardon-logic here)
Title: Re: Callaway
Post by: Scrapheap on December 17, 2009, 06:04:25 PM
TOW I meant, not TCO. Over what?

Why does she bother trying to act mature and stick to the moral highground when in reality she goes just as low? There's a usual cycle to her arguments:

10 Makes preachy post about some liberal bullshit.
20 If person disagrees, go to 30. If not, go back to 10.
30 Says you're wrong and you're dumb for having a different opinion.
40 If person diagrees again, go to 50. If not, go back to 10.
50 Keeps on saying the person is dumb, without explaining on why she thinks the person is wrong. Flings childish insults and ad homs.
60 If person reponds in any form, loop 50. If not, go to 70.
70 RETURN TO 10

 :plus: for the reference to Apple Basic programming.  :lol: It's been 20 years since I've seen shit like that!  :laugh:
Title: Re: Callaway
Post by: Adam on December 17, 2009, 06:05:50 PM
oh and Bint and TOW are friends still afaik. At least as of yesterday. He left here for other reasons I think
Title: Re: Callaway
Post by: Scrapheap on December 17, 2009, 06:11:55 PM
god you're retarded. The point is that we were gheying YOU. not yaying someone you were arguing with because we didn't have the guts to tell you we thought you were an ass to your face.  :duh:

So Callaway doesn't have the right to agree with other people?? GOD you're retarded.  :hahaha: :hahaha: :hahaha: :hahaha: :hahaha:

Trying to compare your systematic gheying campagn of me, to Callaway agreeing with others is a non-sequitur to say the least. Don't try logic Soph, you SUCK at it!!  :hahaha: :hahaha: :hahaha: :hahaha: :hahaha:

Oh, and you're still a liar :lies:
Title: Re: Callaway
Post by: Scrapheap on December 17, 2009, 06:14:37 PM
BTW, nice job gheying me for "failure to understand your post" when I understood perfectly that you were making a non-sequitur.  :hahaha: :hahaha: :hahaha:
Title: Re: Callaway
Post by: Adam on December 17, 2009, 06:16:22 PM
 :yawn:

What's wrong with me gheying you whenever I see a post of yours? I find it funny because it annoys you so much, and hell you had been gheying Starbuline, who hasnt even posted here since summer 07. If we're gonna go into who uses the karma system the most retardedly, then I reckon you'd win there  :thumbup:

And again, the point is that Callaway clearly disagrees with the other person in these arguments, but never actually says it. She just agrees with the people who Do say it. That is the only problem I have.
Title: Re: Callaway
Post by: Scrapheap on December 17, 2009, 06:16:35 PM
Are you done yet Soph??

You call others stupid in order to cover your own fucktardedness. Shut up while you're still behind you stupid cunt!!  :hahaha: :hahaha:  :hahaha:


How is that piece of sand in your vagina feeling right now??  :hahaha: :hahaha: :hahaha:
Title: Re: Callaway
Post by: Scrapheap on December 17, 2009, 06:18:46 PM
What's wrong with me gheying you whenever I see a post of yours? I find it funny because it annoys you so much, and hell you had been gheying Starbuline, who hasnt even posted here since summer 07. If we're gonna go into who uses the karma system the most retardedly, then I reckon you'd win there  :thumbup:

I gheyed her 3 times to get your attention. You yayed her over a thousand times since she was here. Hypocrite much??  :hahaha: :hahaha: :hahaha:
Title: Re: Callaway
Post by: Scrapheap on December 17, 2009, 06:19:46 PM
Come on CUNT!!! Lets see what you've got you whiny bitch!!!


Fucking COWARD!!!  :finger: :finger: :hahaha:
Title: Re: Callaway
Post by: Adam on December 17, 2009, 06:21:30 PM
I didn't yay her over a thousand times actually. I changed her karma to a certain number while I was admin. This was nearly two years ago and I haven't yayed her once since I'd been back, until you started gheying her. Pretty lame. :wanker:
Title: Re: Callaway
Post by: Adam on December 17, 2009, 06:22:56 PM
Again, you don't see to understand what I'm saying: I don't care if people yay me or ghey me - what I DO dislike, is when people clearly have a problem with someone and don't say it to their face. How does my gheying you make me a hypocrite there? I don't think you can accuse me of being too scared to say what I think
Title: Re: Callaway
Post by: Scrapheap on December 17, 2009, 06:23:56 PM
You're still a fucking hypocrite.  :hahaha:
Title: Re: Callaway
Post by: Scrapheap on December 17, 2009, 06:29:07 PM
Again, you don't see to understand what I'm saying: I don't care if people yay me or ghey me - what I DO dislike, is when people clearly have a problem with someone and don't say it to their face. How does my gheying you make me a hypocrite there? I don't think you can accuse me of being too scared to say what I think

AGAIN, YOU'RE MAKING A NON-SEQUITUR!! This is just a cheap attempt to misdirect the argument away from Starbilines karma.

This red-herring is yet another deceptive argument you seem so fond of. Would you just STFU already and admit that you're just trolling for the lulz??

Seriously, your lies are a bit too easy to see through.  :hahaha:
Title: Re: Callaway
Post by: Scrapheap on December 17, 2009, 06:31:21 PM
I don't care if people yay me or ghey me.

:lies:

Well, that certianly explains why you gheyed  me 5 time for gheying you once.  :wanker: Fucking liar!! :lies:
Title: Re: Callaway
Post by: Scrapheap on December 17, 2009, 06:34:20 PM
The liar has run off with her tail between her legs.  :hahaha:
Title: Re: Callaway
Post by: ProfessorFarnsworth on December 17, 2009, 06:38:00 PM
Heh, all this ghey bombing reminds me of the time Kosmo ghey bombed TCO to oblivion.
Title: Re: Callaway
Post by: Adam on December 17, 2009, 06:43:07 PM
The liar has run off with her tail between her legs.  :hahaha:

Wow this is really getting to you isn't it?  :2thumbsup:

I went on another site for a minute

But yeh, I don't see how I am a hypocrite. I kept gheying you because I saw that it was annoying you that you weren't on 69. Not because I was sad that you'd gheyed me. If you'rekeeping track of these things that much then it must be bothering you.

Especially as you're meant to have me on ignore  :pwned:
Title: Re: Callaway
Post by: Adam on December 17, 2009, 06:45:33 PM
Oh and just so you know, I won't be replying again for a while as I'm going to bed - it's nearly 1am here and I wanna go out in the morning

Not running off with my tail between my legs :zoinks:
Title: Re: Callaway
Post by: Scrapheap on December 17, 2009, 08:31:02 PM
But yeh, I don't see how I am a hypocrite. I kept gheying you because I saw that it was annoying you that you weren't on 69. Not because I was sad that you'd gheyed me. If you'rekeeping track of these things that much then it must be bothering you.

:lies:

You gheyed me once for talking about the weather and I gheyed you back. You then gheyed me 3 times in a row for no reason. I hadn't even mentioned being on 69 untill after you did that, liar!!  :finger: :hahaha:
Title: Re: Callaway
Post by: Callaway on December 17, 2009, 10:36:22 PM
Why is Callaway attacking Bint's supposed-ill-treatment of her friends? That has nothing to do with the issues raised. It seems very politician like to initiate a mud-slinging match instead of answering the charges.

It has everything to do with the issue Bint raised, GalileoAce.

Bint was claiming that I don't express my opinions openly when I disagree with someone.

I openly expressed my opinion as to what it is about her that I have a problem with and why I have likely held back from saying anything about it to her before, because I see her as somewhat fragile and I would not want to feel responsible for her harming herself again.
Title: Re: Callaway
Post by: Blasted on December 18, 2009, 02:05:49 AM
But yeh, I don't see how I am a hypocrite. I kept gheying you because I saw that it was annoying you that you weren't on 69. Not because I was sad that you'd gheyed me. If you'rekeeping track of these things that much then it must be bothering you.

:lies:

You gheyed me once for talking about the weather and I gheyed you back. You then gheyed me 3 times in a row for no reason. I hadn't even mentioned being on 69 untill after you did that, liar!!  :finger: :hahaha:

How is he a liar?  If anything, you're the liar here.

You made a thread saying you want to get to 69.  Then you were a dickhead so we thought it would be fun to do everything to stop you from getting to 69 because you obviously cared so much about it  :zoinks:  End of.

God you're thick.
Title: Re: Callaway
Post by: renaeden on December 18, 2009, 02:23:38 AM
Why is Callaway attacking Bint's supposed-ill-treatment of her friends? That has nothing to do with the issues raised. It seems very politician like to initiate a mud-slinging match instead of answering the charges.

It has everything to do with the issue Bint raised, GalileoAce.

Bint was claiming that I don't express my opinions openly when I disagree with someone.

I openly expressed my opinion as to what it is about her that I have a problem with and why I have likely held back from saying anything about it to her before, because I see her as somewhat fragile and I would not want to feel responsible for her harming herself again.
imo and going from personal experience, no one person can make another person harm themselves or commit suicide, etc. Because that person makes that choice for themselves. So there is no point in feeling responsible for a choice someone else made.
Title: Re: Callaway
Post by: 'andersom' on December 18, 2009, 02:35:51 AM
Why is Callaway attacking Bint's supposed-ill-treatment of her friends? That has nothing to do with the issues raised. It seems very politician like to initiate a mud-slinging match instead of answering the charges.

It has everything to do with the issue Bint raised, GalileoAce.

Bint was claiming that I don't express my opinions openly when I disagree with someone.

I openly expressed my opinion as to what it is about her that I have a problem with and why I have likely held back from saying anything about it to her before, because I see her as somewhat fragile and I would not want to feel responsible for her harming herself again.
imo and going from personal experience, no one person can make another person harm themselves or commit suicide, etc. Because that person makes that choice for themselves. So there is no point in feeling responsible for a choice someone else made.

You are right there.

Yet I do understand how in some situations people mentally tiptoe around people spreading self-harming and suicidal thoughts. Been there, done that. Because there can be this guilt-tripping play going on too, leaving bystanders with the nasty idea they could have prevented it. Don't think the situation here is that way though.

Other reason to hold back can be that you just can't be arsed to get involved. Been there and done that too. OR because the drama it could evoke is just too much there and then, waiting for a better timing. Been there and done that too.

But you are right, unless in ways of real cruelty and mental and physical violence, people cannot make another commit suicide or harm themselves. The urge to do that is within the person doing that. And what ever triggers it, it is still their decision. And I don't think it is at stake here.

Title: Re: Callaway
Post by: renaeden on December 18, 2009, 02:39:21 AM
I don't think it is at stake either. Gus is in charge of herself in this way.

:plus: for describing what I was thinking!
Title: Re: Callaway
Post by: Phlexor on December 18, 2009, 02:47:07 AM
I think you can make someone kill themselves if you put your mind to it. You'd have to be a sick minded person to do that though.

Also another thing to consider, is that a lot of times people kill themselves when you think that they are doing much better than usual. (poorly worded).
Title: Re: Callaway
Post by: 'andersom' on December 18, 2009, 02:54:17 AM
I think you can make someone kill themselves if you put your mind to it. You'd have to be a sick minded person to do that though.

Also another thing to consider, is that a lot of times people kill themselves when you think that they are doing much better than usual. (poorly worded).

Yes, it can happen, but those are cases of extreme mental and or physical violence and cruelty. Sick minded persons indeed, doing that. Not at stake here.

And people self harming or killing themselves when you don't expect it. Alas, happens a lot. And it just cannot be seen and noticed. That's the whole thing. So ending up then, with extreme guilt-feelings is in the mind of the one feeling the guilt, not really being guilty of what happened, but feeling the weight of it heavily. The if only.

[/derail?]
Title: Re: Callaway
Post by: Adam on December 18, 2009, 11:38:55 AM
But yeh, I don't see how I am a hypocrite. I kept gheying you because I saw that it was annoying you that you weren't on 69. Not because I was sad that you'd gheyed me. If you'rekeeping track of these things that much then it must be bothering you.

:lies:

You gheyed me once for talking about the weather and I gheyed you back. You then gheyed me 3 times in a row for no reason. I hadn't even mentioned being on 69 untill after you did that, liar!!  :finger: :hahaha:
lololol The one where I gheyed ou for the weather was ALSO for no reason. Why would I ghey you for the weather? I saw you going on about the 69 thing and you were currently one or two BELOW 69, so I decided I'd start gheying you for random posts. I'd probably have started plussing you for random posts if you'd been on 70 or 71

I coud probably go through MSN chatlogs and find the part where I was laughing about it with Bint. But I don'tthink I can be arsed  :zoinks:

Christ allmighty you are stupid  :lolhit:

Title: Re: Callaway
Post by: Scrapheap on December 18, 2009, 11:53:43 AM
How is SHE a liar?

fixed.  :police: 

Quote from: Bintytard
God you're thick.

Pot calling the wind-driven snow, black.  :wanker:
Title: Re: Callaway
Post by: Scrapheap on December 18, 2009, 11:56:02 AM
Christ allmighty I'm stupid  :lolhit:



fixed.  :police:
Title: Re: Callaway
Post by: Callaway on December 18, 2009, 03:44:27 PM
I think the issue centers around Callaway's "angelic"/"nice"/"nurturing" persona/tendencies.  I think members:
A)  Resent that she is too "perfect"/"nice"/etc
B)  Resent it when she is not 100% "perfect"/"nice"/etc. (i.e. does not conform to the idealized standards they have set for her based on their perception of her)
and/or
C)  Feel threatened by how well she is able to hold her own in arguments when she actually does have them on here

She generally does make a great deal of sense in what she posts.  She generally does not nitpick or confront unless she feels quite strongly (at least, that is my intuition).  I also think that when she uses karma instead of posting, it's somewhat of a meduim between confronting and not reactinhg at all.  I.e., a way of avoiding making a federal issue out of things/starting some huge war, but still having a reaction.  I could be wrong on that, though.

...jesus, how many times have I given the same basic "this-is-why-callaway-freaks-people-out" speech on here?

I think I was the first to clash with Callaway here. I think you missed why people have an issue with Callaway by a little bit. Her "niceness" can come across as a false front because she is on occasion bitchy in subtle ways. Eclair used the term "fly under the radar bitchyness". This can lead to the impression that she's a mean spirited person who goes to great lenghts to hide it.  :police:

I think that PMS Elle is right. 

I see what you're saying, though.  Since I'm a mostly kind person who is not always perfectly nice, some people may think the niceness is just a facade.

It's not though.  I have never pretended to be perfect, but I'm a pretty nice person who has flaws just like everyone else does. 

I think it's interesting that nobody would question that a person who was mostly unkind but not always completely cruel just had an unkind facade and went to great lengths to hide it.
Title: Re: Callaway
Post by: Adam on December 18, 2009, 04:16:05 PM
Because there isn't anything obvious to get out of that

Although some people do actually suspect that of a few people - that they're not as nasty as they make themselves out to be

I don't mind if someone is nice all the time

I just would rather someone told me what they think of me to my face. I prefer to know where I stand with people and always assumed that most others were the same on these sites - I mean a lot of us had the bitchy "nice-to-your-face-but-dont-like-you-really" crap in high school, so I guess it just reminds me of that

Obviously people have their different personalities and different ways of handling things, but that is just the way I find it easier to get along with people, as I no longer trust people who don't say it to your face when they have a problem with you
Title: Re: Callaway
Post by: jman on December 18, 2009, 04:18:29 PM
Because there isn't anything obvious to get out of that

Although some people do actually suspect that of a few people - that they're not as nasty as they make themselves out to be

I don't mind if someone is nice all the time

I just would rather someone told me what they think of me to my face. I prefer to know where I stand with people and always assumed that most others were the same on these sites - I mean a lot of us had the bitchy "nice-to-your-face-but-dont-like-you-really" crap in high school, so I guess it just reminds me of that

Obviously people have their different personalities and different ways of handling things, but that is just the way I find it easier to get along with people, as I no longer trust people who don't say it to your face when they have a problem with you

In a perfect world this would be so, but as it stands callaway is entitled to her opinion and she is not obligated to share with it everyone
Title: Re: Callaway
Post by: Callaway on December 18, 2009, 04:21:59 PM
Because there isn't anything obvious to get out of that

Although some people do actually suspect that of a few people - that they're not as nasty as they make themselves out to be

I don't mind if someone is nice all the time

I just would rather someone told me what they think of me to my face. I prefer to know where I stand with people and always assumed that most others were the same on these sites - I mean a lot of us had the bitchy "nice-to-your-face-but-dont-like-you-really" crap in high school, so I guess it just reminds me of that

Obviously people have their different personalities and different ways of handling things, but that is just the way I find it easier to get along with people, as I no longer trust people who don't say it to your face when they have a problem with you

I like you but I think psycho-gheying someone because you disagree with them is childish.
Title: Re: Callaway
Post by: Adam on December 18, 2009, 04:26:19 PM
Don't you think it's childish to get so worked up about karma in the first place (PPK) or to start gheying someone who died two years ago in the hope that it would piss off another member (scrapheap) is childish too?

Those are the only two people I've psycho-gheyed, and both times I did it because they were so botherd by it in the first place. On a site which is supposed to be "intense" i think someone who is so hurt by being gheyed once needs gheying a few more times before they grow some balls. That is what I did with PPK.

With scrapheap I kept gheying him away from 69 while other people were trying to yay him onto 69. I don't see what's so terrible about that.

Anyone else I've gheyed I've gheyed because I thought either their post was retarded, or they were being a complete ass. Also me and Bint were not the only once gheying people like that. Look at what Scrapheap was doing.That is far more childish IMO.
Title: Re: Callaway
Post by: Frolic_Fun on December 18, 2009, 04:40:57 PM
I find the karma system to be dumb so I just don't bother at all. I will voice my approval/disapproval instead.
Title: Re: Callaway
Post by: renaeden on December 18, 2009, 07:30:44 PM
I find the karma system to be dumb so I just don't bother at all. I will voice my approval/disapproval instead.
You do bother, you have two pages of karma changing.
Title: Re: Callaway
Post by: 'andersom' on December 19, 2009, 03:36:57 AM
 :laugh:
Title: Re: Callaway
Post by: Frolic_Fun on December 19, 2009, 05:01:10 AM
Not recently, no. I haven't done it in months.
Title: Re: Callaway
Post by: 'andersom' on December 19, 2009, 05:50:38 AM
Just copying all of this here. I know, not my business, but just like it better here.

Always gopod to see pics of you two (Phlex and Parts).

Soph wrote: "Heinrich (+314/-51)     Sir_Les_Patterson (+691/-250)     -     gopod = typo or due to masturbating?     In topic     Today at 03:49:30 AM

I am Dyslexic and I made a typo. If you want to ask questions it is probably better to ask them face. I prefer that than you trying to let your karma tell me. You know what I mean. I think there is a callout somewhere where karma comments have come up. You may know about it. In fact I think you may even be involved. ;)
I did say it to your face, dipshit - that was your karma, not anyone else's  :lol:
Always gopod to see pics of you two (Phlex and Parts).

Soph wrote: "Heinrich (+314/-51)     Sir_Les_Patterson (+691/-250)     -     gopod = typo or due to masturbating?     In topic     Today at 03:49:30 AM

I am Dyslexic and I made a typo. If you want to ask questions it is probably better to ask them face. I prefer that than you trying to let your karma tell me. You know what I mean. I think there is a callout somewhere where karma comments have come up. You may know about it. In fact I think you may even be involved. ;)

I did say it to your face, dipshit - that was your karma, not anyone else's  :lol:

Hmmmm....OK Dipshit


My problem is that you prefer to stay schtum about things that annoy you and instead use karma to say what you truly think.  Now, I think that's cowardly as hell so I'm calling you out on it.

I call out Callaway for being sneaky and not brave enough to disagree with someone openly  8)

My problem is that you prefer to stay schtum about things that annoy you and instead use karma to say what you truly think. 

:LMAO::rofl::rofl::rofl::rofl:

...and the winner for the Biggest Hypocrite in the Universe goes to...  :borg: The BintySoph Borg Collective!!!   :congrats:


I guess by openly you mean on the boar where one can answer allegations that might "cowardly" be made in the karma comments? Yes?
Well me and Bint are two entirely different people, despite what you and your friends seem to think :zoinks:

I have absolutely no problem with gheying someone or getting gheyed by someone
Also, it's not like I or Soph haven't called you dumbass to your face  :lol:
Oh don't try the oh we are two separate people. You conduct yourself as the one and answer each others posts, spam each others threads, ghey the same posts, share identical viewpoints for the most part and even use each other' s accounts and now say "Oh but we ought to be viewed as different?  :lol:

You kids.  :zoinks:

Now Bint is screwed up because of her BPD and as you share the same mentality as her Soph I wonder why you do?

Bint the whole thing with the karma comments thing is you called Callaway out on "openess" amd yet many of your comments you make are by their design (Like Soph's here are not "open" to the board and not able to be addressed openly. (Unless someone was to do as I have done). You use karma comments in a way that is not open and condemn Callaway for using karma in a way that is dishonest.

Scrap is dead right with his call on Hypocrisy irrespective on whether you would also say this to anyone's face.
lol Fucking hell Les, this is like trying to explain something to a  3 year old

We didn't callout Callaway for not being open in that she wasn't posting on the board

If she'd been gheying the people she disagreed with, we wouldn't have accused her of anything

Do you understand that or do you need me to type it out again in baby words? :thumbup:
We use each other's accounts?  :orly:  News to me  :zoinks:

I could just as well call you and Scrapheap the thicko borg  :lolhit:
Title: Re: Callaway
Post by: 'andersom' on December 19, 2009, 05:56:10 AM
lol Fucking hell Les, this is like trying to explain something to a  3 year old

We didn't callout Callaway for not being open in that she wasn't posting on the board

If she'd been gheying the people she disagreed with, we wouldn't have accused her of anything

Do you understand that or do you need me to type it out again in baby words? :thumbup:


Still don't get it Soph, is Bint calling out Callaway simply for her style?
Her style has been like that as long as I can remember.

So, maybe I do need spelling it out in baby words. Because my style is not that different from that of Callaway.
Do we have to change our styles of posting, because of Bint and you? Why?

Addressing you here Soph, because you claim to be able to speak for Bint here.
Title: Re: Callaway
Post by: P7PSP on December 19, 2009, 08:35:27 AM
Don't you think it's childish to get so worked up about karma in the first place (PPK) or to start gheying someone who died two years ago in the hope that it would piss off another member (scrapheap) is childish too?

Those are the only two people I've psycho-gheyed, and both times I did it because they were so botherd by it in the first place. On a site which is supposed to be "intense" i think someone who is so hurt by being gheyed once needs gheying a few more times before they grow some balls. That is what I did with PPK.

With scrapheap I kept gheying him away from 69 while other people were trying to yay him onto 69. I don't see what's so terrible about that.

Anyone else I've gheyed I've gheyed because I thought either their post was retarded, or they were being a complete ass. Also me and Bint were not the only once gheying people like that. Look at what Scrapheap was doing.That is far more childish IMO.
You post about others not having balls and you arre afraid to leave Manchester without mummy holding your hand.
Title: Re: Callaway
Post by: Adam on December 19, 2009, 08:41:39 AM
lol Fucking hell Les, this is like trying to explain something to a  3 year old

We didn't callout Callaway for not being open in that she wasn't posting on the board

If she'd been gheying the people she disagreed with, we wouldn't have accused her of anything

Do you understand that or do you need me to type it out again in baby words? :thumbup:


Still don't get it Soph, is Bint calling out Callaway simply for her style?
Her style has been like that as long as I can remember.

So, maybe I do need spelling it out in baby words. Because my style is not that different from that of Callaway.
Do we have to change our styles of posting, because of Bint and you? Why?

Addressing you here Soph, because you claim to be able to speak for Bint here.

If by 'style' you mean not saying what you think to someone directly, then yes ok.
Title: Re: Callaway
Post by: renaeden on December 19, 2009, 11:04:06 PM
We are all spazzes but Callaway has never said so about herself. Is she autistic? If you ask, you will get a PM.
Embrace your retarded spazziness Callaway! :green: :autism:
Title: Re: Callaway
Post by: Al Swearegen on December 20, 2009, 04:01:23 AM
We are all spazzes but Callaway has never said so about herself. Is she autistic? If you ask, you will get a PM.
Embrace your retarded spazziness Callaway! :green: :autism:

Oh Bint isn't. She is not on the spectrum. Because Bint is such a worthwhile contributor and gives so much value to this place we over look this omission. She does have BPD so she is allowed to get away with anything and not be responsible for anything.
Title: Re: Callaway
Post by: Blasted on December 20, 2009, 04:03:15 AM
I'm a mean, nasty NT that's making poor, little Les cry (emo)
Title: Re: Callaway
Post by: Adam on December 20, 2009, 04:06:21 AM
We are all spazzes but Callaway has never said so about herself. Is she autistic? If you ask, you will get a PM.
Embrace your retarded spazziness Callaway! :green: :autism:

Oh Bint isn't. She is not on the spectrum. Because Bint is such a worthwhile contributor and gives so much value to this place we over look this omission. She does have BPD so she is allowed to get away with anything and not be responsible for anything.

This omission?

Who the fuck do you think you are? This is not an autism forum. It is a forum where most of the members are autistic, but being autistic is not a requirement

Also when you consider it is a spectrum there's every bit as much chance that Bint is closer to some autistic people on the spectrum than some autistic people are to each other


Not having AS doesn't mean you have to prove yourself in some other way or fuck off. Just like having AS doesn't in any way prove anything other than that you have AS
Title: Re: Callaway
Post by: Al Swearegen on December 20, 2009, 04:26:55 AM
We are all spazzes but Callaway has never said so about herself. Is she autistic? If you ask, you will get a PM.
Embrace your retarded spazziness Callaway! :green: :autism:

Oh Bint isn't. She is not on the spectrum. Because Bint is such a worthwhile contributor and gives so much value to this place we over look this omission. She does have BPD so she is allowed to get away with anything and not be responsible for anything.

This omission?

Who the fuck do you think you are? This is not an autism forum. It is a forum where most of the members are autistic, but being autistic is not a requirement

Also when you consider it is a spectrum there's every bit as much chance that Bint is closer to some autistic people on the spectrum than some autistic people are to each other


Not having AS doesn't mean you have to prove yourself in some other way or fuck off. Just like having AS doesn't in any way prove anything other than that you have AS

Oh pipe down Junior.You will confuse shit out of your neighbours screaming and raging at a computer monitor.
Who the fuck am I? Sir Les Patterson.
The omission? See I was thinking of using the word "different" or even rephrasing the sentence entirely but I thought the way I did would get the bigger reaction  :lol:
Not a requirement here and never said I even wanted her to fuck off? Where are getting this whole concept from. SophBint is the new AllGlowing Randy. Every forum needs one.
What is it you are wanting to prove Soph? Did not ask for proof and you are not clear why or what you are thinking needs to be proved.
Her being closer to us? Nope she it just a weird freakshow and an drama-seeking attention whore.
Title: Re: Callaway
Post by: Blasted on December 20, 2009, 04:34:24 AM
Les you really need to get over your obsession with Soph and me.  It's sad.
Title: Re: Callaway
Post by: Al Swearegen on December 20, 2009, 04:50:01 AM
Les you really need to get over your obsession with Soph and me.  It's sad.

Gus you should really get over yourself to realise you are not the centre of all our lives.  :rofl:

Is that part of your BPD thing? Exaggerated Ego? Yes?
Title: Re: Callaway
Post by: Blasted on December 20, 2009, 04:53:27 AM
Les you really need to get over your obsession with Soph and me.  It's sad.

Gus you should really get over yourself to realise you are not the centre of all our lives.  :rofl:

Is that part of your BPD thing? Exaggerated Ego? Yes?


Your posts beg to differ  :zoinks:

Even before the Callaway callout, most of them concerned us two.  I wonder why that is  :orly:
Title: Re: Callaway
Post by: renaeden on December 20, 2009, 05:24:27 AM
We are all spazzes but Callaway has never said so about herself. Is she autistic? If you ask, you will get a PM.
Embrace your retarded spazziness Callaway! :green: :autism:
Oh Bint isn't. She is not on the spectrum.
I meant we are all spazzes. That includes Gus/Bint.
I guess I am hoping that Callaway will feel at ease enough with us to reveal her spazzy self, autistic or whatever.
Title: Re: Callaway
Post by: Al Swearegen on December 20, 2009, 05:30:56 AM
Les you really need to get over your obsession with Soph and me.  It's sad.

Gus you should really get over yourself to realise you are not the centre of all our lives.  :rofl:

Is that part of your BPD thing? Exaggerated Ego? Yes?


Your posts beg to differ  :zoinks:

Even before the Callaway callout, most of them concerned us two.  I wonder why that is  :orly:

I dunno? Would it perhaps have something to do with the amount you two post and the number of posts that encompasses on the board and the fact that active threads are the ones I post on? Maybe the fact that you posts I feel at any point in time have things I want to address? But then the question is rhetorical isn't it Bint. What are you wanting to get out of asking it?
Title: Re: Callaway
Post by: Blasted on December 20, 2009, 05:34:59 AM
I dunno? Would it perhaps have something to do with the amount you two post and the number of posts that encompasses on the board and the fact that active threads are the ones I post on?

Incorrect.  The number of times you revived old threads just to have a dig at me or Soph  ::)

Quote
Maybe the fact that you posts I feel at any point in time have things I want to address? But then the question is rhetorical isn't it Bint.

Dunno about rhetorical but it sure is muddled.
Title: Re: Callaway
Post by: Al Swearegen on December 20, 2009, 05:45:35 AM
I dunno? Would it perhaps have something to do with the amount you two post and the number of posts that encompasses on the board and the fact that active threads are the ones I post on?

Incorrect.  The number of times you revived old threads just to have a dig at me or Soph  ::)

Quote

Yup mostly I find someone has plused or gheyed me on something and click on it to find what it was and then address it. Again what are you trying to say. You are not making sense. I like having a dig at you and Soph. I think you need it. :D

Maybe the fact that your posts I feel at any point in time have things I want to address? But then the question is rhetorical isn't it Bint.

Dunno about rhetorical but it sure is muddled.

Reads fine to me after the mere placing of an "r" on the word you. Sure this is not too much to stump you. I mean you are in college and all....oh sorry I forgot. Not a sore point I hope.  :lolhit:
Title: Re: Callaway
Post by: Blasted on December 20, 2009, 05:47:07 AM
I dunno? Would it perhaps have something to do with the amount you two post and the number of posts that encompasses on the board and the fact that active threads are the ones I post on?

Incorrect.  The number of times you revived old threads just to have a dig at me or Soph  ::)

Quote

Yup mostly I find someone has plused or gheyed me on something and click on it to find what it was and then address it. Again what are you trying to say. You are not making sense. I like having a dig at you and Soph. I think you need it. :D

Maybe the fact that your posts I feel at any point in time have things I want to address? But then the question is rhetorical isn't it Bint.

Dunno about rhetorical but it sure is muddled.

Reads fine to me after the mere placing of an "r" on the word you. Sure this is not too much to stump you. I mean you are in college and all....oh sorry I forgot. Not a sore point I hope.  :lolhit:

For me?  No  :zoinks:

I'm not insecure about my intelligence unlike you  ;)
Title: Re: Callaway
Post by: Adam on December 20, 2009, 05:56:27 AM
Les why do you go on about college and school so much when you try and insult us? Is it a sore issue for you or something?  :hahaha:

Title: Re: Callaway
Post by: Al Swearegen on December 20, 2009, 06:10:48 AM
Les why do you go on about college and school so much when you try and insult us? Is it a sore issue for you or something?  :hahaha:

"So much"? Like more than the Dog thing or the Obsessive Compulsive thing or the retarded thing or the maturity thing or the Transgender thing? I don't. I do know that Bint has been kicked out of college and was whining about that recently and find it funny as hell.
What do you think I am having trouble with in this regard. I am not sensitive but hey try giving me a dig. May be worth it?
Title: Re: Callaway
Post by: Callaway on December 20, 2009, 06:16:19 AM
We are all spazzes but Callaway has never said so about herself. Is she autistic? If you ask, you will get a PM.
Embrace your retarded spazziness Callaway! :green: :autism:

I have never once denied being a complete spaz, but I'm on the other end of the spectrum from retarded. 

 :smarty:
Title: Re: Callaway
Post by: Adam on December 20, 2009, 06:56:29 AM
Les why do you go on about college and school so much when you try and insult us? Is it a sore issue for you or something?  :hahaha:

"So much"? Like more than the Dog thing or the Obsessive Compulsive thing or the retarded thing or the maturity thing or the Transgender thing? I don't. I do know that Bint has been kicked out of college and was whining about that recently and find it funny as hell.
What do you think I am having trouble with in this regard. I am not sensitive but hey try giving me a dig. May be worth it?

Yeh the dog thing got to me that week, I'm not ashamed to admit that. A simple "dumbass" comment got you worked up as well though, so I wouldn't feel too fanastic about yourself if I were you  :hahaha:

Even comments about my pets don't get to me now though so carry on - try your hardest Les  :zoinks:
Title: Re: Callaway
Post by: 'andersom' on December 20, 2009, 06:13:17 PM
lol Fucking hell Les, this is like trying to explain something to a  3 year old

We didn't callout Callaway for not being open in that she wasn't posting on the board

If she'd been gheying the people she disagreed with, we wouldn't have accused her of anything

Do you understand that or do you need me to type it out again in baby words? :thumbup:


Still don't get it Soph, is Bint calling out Callaway simply for her style?
Her style has been like that as long as I can remember.

So, maybe I do need spelling it out in baby words. Because my style is not that different from that of Callaway.
Do we have to change our styles of posting, because of Bint and you? Why?

Addressing you here Soph, because you claim to be able to speak for Bint here.

If by 'style' you mean not saying what you think to someone directly, then yes ok.

I still don't get it.

And I tried. Went through pages on how Callaway uses karma. The first real negative karma I found was September 11, towards Soleiyu, who said all Americans, Canadians etc. etc. should be put in the gas-chambers if he had authority about that. And it is obvious that Sol aggravated Callaway as much as he could.

For the rest Callaway plusses, and she plusses a lot, sometimes plusses in disguise, using a ghey.

And she did plus you and Bint too when you look further back, now she changed her actions there and plusses the two of you less or not, sorry, did not look that close.

So, if you want to find an opinion, you can find it.

The way you and Bint post are apparently not of the same quality as the posts of Soleiyu. And that's a fair call I think.
And she plusses you less. That can mean several things. That she is disagreeing with the way you post, who knows, can also mean that she thinks they are not exiting enough to comment on.

Callaway has no obligation to tell why she is not plussing some people. And since she uses gheying only very rarely, you can't blame her for not gheying you either.

And of course, all kinds of other explanations for her not plussing you are possible.

Is there a need to call Callaway out? Don't think so. If you and/or Bint are curious about what she thinks of the posting style of you and/or Bint, you can just ask in an ask away thread. Why polemise when you only want to know what she thinks of you.
Title: Re: Callaway
Post by: Adam on December 20, 2009, 06:19:01 PM
Huh? I'm not bothered about her not plussing me

It's that she was alway plussing people in arguments but never actually saying anything. Always conveniently staying out of it but not entirely. She obviously agreed with those people she was plussing, so why not actually come straight out and say it herself? Instead of just plussing the people who do have it in them to say what they think.

And I don't see what's wrong with calling someone out for that. Especially on a site that is meant to be "intense." It's hardly very intense if you don't have the guts to say what you think.
Title: Re: Callaway
Post by: 'andersom' on December 20, 2009, 06:25:00 PM
Huh? I'm not bothered about her not plussing me

It's that she was alway plussing people in arguments but never actually saying anything. Always conveniently staying out of it but not entirely. She obviously agreed with those people she was plussing, so why not actually come straight out and say it herself? Instead of just plussing the people who do have it in them to say what they think.

And I don't see what's wrong with calling someone out for that. Especially on a site that is meant to be "intense." It's hardly very intense if you don't have the guts to say what you think.

It is possible to plus people without agreeing. At least, it is possible for me.

Like in that transgender thing, best post was CG's, so I plussed her. Most funny post was the Smurf post of Scrap. Don't agree with him on transgender opinions, but found it extremely funny. He surprised me with it, and I think I plussed him for that, if not, I should have.

There can be many reasons to plus. And does not all have to be about agreeing.

Title: Re: Callaway
Post by: renaeden on December 21, 2009, 03:25:41 AM
We are all spazzes but Callaway has never said so about herself. Is she autistic? If you ask, you will get a PM.
Embrace your retarded spazziness Callaway! :green: :autism:

I have never once denied being a complete spaz, but I'm on the other end of the spectrum from retarded. 

 :smarty:
I know you have never denied it but you haven't said anything along the lines of "I am a proud autistic spazz" either. I don't think being autistic is something to be ashamed of on here.

Sorry for implying you are retarded. I didn't mean it in that way.
Title: Re: Callaway
Post by: Mr Smith on December 21, 2009, 09:25:26 AM
So you think that my use of karma is your business but the way you treat your friends here is none of my business?

I think that your treatment of your friends here is my business just as much as my use of karma is yours.

This is stupid.

What bint does in terms of friendships is none of your business callaway as it doesn't affect you. If she chooses to be rude to the people here and loses friends over it thats really not your problem and does not require your involvement. If the people shes annoyed have a problem they can hit her up themselves. Your karma does affect her, even though you are more than entitled to express your opinion through it, it is her business because of this.
As its none of my business either, i'm leaving this thread without an opinion on what went down with said friendships. It doesn't, and shouldn't affect me. Its about time i stopped butting into other peoples business.

Not that I think bints behaviour here has been mature, but I'm looking at this from an unbiased view. I don't have anything against either of you.
Title: Re: Callaway
Post by: Callaway on December 21, 2009, 10:14:27 AM
So you think that my use of karma is your business but the way you treat your friends here is none of my business?

I think that your treatment of your friends here is my business just as much as my use of karma is yours.

This is stupid.

What bint does in terms of friendships is none of your business callaway as it doesn't affect you. If she chooses to be rude to the people here and loses friends over it thats really not your problem and does not require your involvement. If the people shes annoyed have a problem they can hit her up themselves. Your karma does affect her, even though you are more than entitled to express your opinion through it, it is her business because of this.
As its none of my business either, i'm leaving this thread without an opinion on what went down with said friendships. It doesn't, and shouldn't affect me. Its about time i stopped butting into other peoples business.

Not that I think bints behaviour here has been mature, but I'm looking at this from an unbiased view. I don't have anything against either of you.

Bint called me out claiming that I had been using karma rather than openly expressing my opinion about her.  She demanded to know my opinion.  So I expressed my honest opinion about how she treats people here who used to be her friends.  How she treats her so-called friends on MSN or ZOMG or through email is nothing to me; however, I think that her nastiness on Intensity to the people who used to be her friends does affect the climate here.  Since I care about Intensity, I think that how she affects the climate here is my business just as much as whether I plus someone with whom she happens to disagree is her business.  She's not claiming that I am psycho-gheying her or something like that, because I'm not.  I think that would be her business.
Title: Re: Callaway
Post by: Adam on December 21, 2009, 12:10:17 PM
Anyone who complains about being psycho-gheyed is a retard
Title: Re: Callaway
Post by: Scrapheap on December 21, 2009, 12:23:40 PM
Anyone who psycho-gheyes is a retard

If ever there was a post that needed fixing...
Title: Re: Callaway
Post by: The Member Formerly Known As Sophist on December 25, 2009, 01:56:45 PM
Callaway is usually calm in the face of arguments, which is why she's been an administrator on my forum for well over 3 and a half years. It's why I chose her and I imagine she's mod here for the same reason.

Callaway is her own person with her own personality. Just because she isn't gheying people right and left and being quite as intense as many of the members on Intensity is because that's her personality. She's a person who seems to strive to be kind and fair. And if the people on here who struggle with achieving the same level of diplomacy instead choose to criticize her for lack of mudslinging and ridiculous namecalling, then you're just angry, jealous, and paranoid. Get over yourselves.

Telling something to someone's cyber-face rather than keeping it to yourself doesn't mean you're "honest", telling it like it is.  ::) It just means you don't censor whatever spills out of your mouth. And there's more to communicating and being REAL than letting fly whatever comes to mind. Any dickhead can do that. Callaway, in all of her calmness, is more sincere and real than most of the people on here fighting and bickering and spazzing.

Saying whatever you're thinking doesn't take talent. What's admirable is realizing when you should hold your tongue, in spite of the temptation not to do so. There's no point in wasting your breath talking if the person you're saying it to isn't going to hear you. How you say something is just as important as what you say.

And unlike a number of people on here, I've always found Callaway to understand this difference.
Title: Re: Callaway
Post by: 'andersom' on December 25, 2009, 02:45:20 PM
Well written Sophist.
Title: Re: Callaway
Post by: Frolic_Fun on December 25, 2009, 03:29:35 PM
She does tend to bias though, going with the people who said the story first and not stopping to see what the other side has to say. If someone said member A raped member B, she'd jump to his/her side even if it was an outright lie.

For this matter though, saying nothing doesn't really make a difference. The whole splint callout thing was silly at best.
Title: Re: Callaway
Post by: Callaway on December 25, 2009, 03:31:46 PM
She does tend to bias though, going with the people who said the story first and not stopping to see what the other side has to say. If someone said member A raped raped B, she'd jump to his/her side even if it was an outright lie.

You are mistaken about this, Shleed.  Actually if it's possible, I almost always try to see what the other person has to say about it first.
Title: Re: Callaway
Post by: Frolic_Fun on December 25, 2009, 03:38:16 PM
I have seen it a few times from you, for example branding pea as a stalker (even though he is a ginger eejit) because of some speculations made by several members. This was before he left, before you say anything. :orly:

You've done it a few times when bint cried about some useless bollocks that was probably lies to gain attention.

...and you done it again by accusing bint of psycho-gheying when it was obviously reactionary. Why? Because Phlextor and crew whined.


You can disagree all you want and I'm not going to force you to realise, you can say I'm wrong. That's fine. I'm just pointing out things lark. :zoinks:
Title: Re: Callaway
Post by: Callaway on December 25, 2009, 03:55:53 PM
I have seen it a few times from you, for example branding pea as a stalker (even though he is a ginger eejit) because of some speculations made by several members. This was before he left, before you say anything. :orly:

You've done it a few times when bint cried about some useless bollocks that was probably lies to gain attention.

...and you done it again by accusing bint of psycho-gheying when it was obviously reactionary. Why? Because Phlextor and crew whined.


You can disagree all you want and I'm not going to force you to realise, you can say I'm wrong. That's fine. I'm just pointing out things lark. :zoinks:

I knew that Pea disagreed that some of the things he had been doing were stalking behavior.  I still thought that they were at least on the borderline of it.  I know that he did not lurk with a camera in a tree outside someone's bedroom window and follow them around IRL, but there are different kinds of stalking.  When someone misuses someone's personal information and goes out of his way to cause someone serious IRL trouble over an internet squabble, I think that's one of them.  Maybe you have a different name for it, like harassment, but it's still  not appropriate behavior.

Both Bint and Soph have been psycho-gheying people.  If you don't think that they have, then just look at both of their karma logs.

I'm not sure about which useless bollocks Bint cried about that was probably only lies to gain attention that I'm supposed to have reacted to.  Could you please be more specific?
Title: Re: Callaway
Post by: Adam on December 25, 2009, 04:32:06 PM
I don't get what the deal is with the psycho-gheying thing

I've done it to wind a couple people up, and it's worked :zoinks:

For example with PPK. I originally gheyed him because he genuinely made a retarded post. He had a tantrum and started gheying me just for gheying  him, so I kept on gheying him whenever I remembered. I thought it was funny that he's such a big american tough guy with his guns and weird rugby game, yet he cries over getting gheyed

Big deal, I yay or ghey people for random shit all the fucking time. I really don't see what's so fucking important about it
Title: Re: Callaway
Post by: Callaway on December 25, 2009, 04:47:11 PM
I still think psycho-gheying is childish.

If you psycho-ghey people to wind them up and it works, then they do stuff they think will wind you up.

You get wound up about this stuff they do, you do stuff back, and then it's a vicious circle.
Title: Re: Callaway
Post by: Adam on December 25, 2009, 04:52:25 PM
I agree it is childish. I'm not gonna try and pretend you're wrong there  :laugh:

The fact that people react so badly to something so childish is what is even more stupid though. If someone keeps gheying me, I don't give a shit or I think it's funny. If someone reacts to it like PPK/Scrapheap did, then that just encourages people. I think on a site like this people should be able to handle something that pathetic
Title: Re: Callaway
Post by: The Member Formerly Known As Sophist on December 25, 2009, 07:35:33 PM
Tens of millions of years of primate evolution, trillions of cells, six thick fucking layers of cortex, near as many synapses as Pi has decimal places, and most people still can't quite grasp cause and effect.

Hit ball. Ball go in pocket. Not miracle. It called billiards.

Doh. :duh:
Title: Re: Callaway
Post by: Adam on December 25, 2009, 07:37:20 PM
I've lost every game of pool I've ever played

I make no apologies for being shit at pool or or low intelligence

At least I'm handsome and charismatic
Title: Re: Callaway
Post by: 'andersom' on December 25, 2009, 07:39:42 PM
I've lost every game of pool I've ever played

I make no apologies for being shit at pool or or low intelligence

At least I'm handsome and charismatic

That's Cosmic's line.  :P
Title: Re: Callaway
Post by: Phlexor on December 25, 2009, 09:34:30 PM
I have seen it a few times from you, for example branding pea as a stalker (even though he is a ginger eejit) because of some speculations made by several members. This was before he left, before you say anything. :orly:

You've done it a few times when bint cried about some useless bollocks that was probably lies to gain attention.

...and you done it again by accusing bint of psycho-gheying when it was obviously reactionary. Why? Because Phlextor and crew whined.


You can disagree all you want and I'm not going to force you to realise, you can say I'm wrong. That's fine. I'm just pointing out things lark. :zoinks:

I has a crew now? Kickass!

But seriously, you talk a lot of shit there shleed and you know it.
Title: Re: Callaway
Post by: Frolic_Fun on December 25, 2009, 10:00:19 PM
That's your opinion on that I talk shit.

Both sides "psycho-gheyed" and spammed. Callaway defended you lot over bint even though you lot did the same. She heard your story and didn't even bother with bints, so it was biased. You are forgetting that I'm not defending bint, just pointing out Callaway's tendacy to bias.


If that's talking shit, then I'm the walking version of an enema.
Title: Re: Callaway
Post by: Phlexor on December 25, 2009, 11:24:20 PM
That's your opinion on that I talk shit.

Both sides "psycho-gheyed" and spammed. Callaway defended you lot over bint even though you lot did the same. She heard your story and didn't even bother with bints, so it was biased. You are forgetting that I'm not defending bint, just pointing out Callaway's tendacy to bias.


If that's talking shit, then I'm the walking version of an enema.

What's there to defend on bints part? She's been constantly saying she needs to leave this place, probably so she can have a life. She even said she was gonna leave at 10,000 posts, that was over 2,000 posts ago.

It's clear she doesn't give a shit anymore and is being self destructive here because in some way I think she wants to be forced out of here.

A lot of people here are rotten shits who would lie cheat and steal there way out of any argument/conversation and they just can't believe that Callaway is a nice person, always thinking she is hiding her true feelings.

Plus you know you are a walking enima, I'm sure you pride yourself on it.
Title: Re: Callaway
Post by: Frolic_Fun on December 26, 2009, 12:53:31 AM
I already know the fact that bint is an attention whoring shite, but that's not the point at all.

I don't hate or like Callaway, I just think she's overly autistic. Sort of like Spokane but without the nappy fetish. She cannot sieve out the lies between the truths, looks at the little details rather than the big picture, painfully points out the obvious etc. She does not have "true feelings" because she simply doesn't understand half the time. People pick this up as being a cunt, but I just pick it up as autistic naivety.
Title: Re: Callaway
Post by: Phlexor on December 26, 2009, 01:16:40 AM
I already know the fact that bint is an attention whoring shite, but that's not the point at all.

I don't hate or like Callaway, I just think she's overly autistic. Sort of like Spokane but without the nappy fetish. She cannot sieve out the lies between the truths, looks at the little details rather than the big picture, painfully points out the obvious etc. She does not have "true feelings" because she simply doesn't understand half the time. People pick this up as being a cunt, but I just pick it up as autistic naivety.

If people want to lie, good luck to them really. Most the the time they get caught out in the long run. At the time there isn't really anything you can do about it.

You can be a liar and a shit, or a generally honest person. I know who I'd rather be at the end of the day.

(lying involves making an effort to make shit up, I'm too lazy for that I think).
Title: Re: Callaway
Post by: odeon on December 26, 2009, 06:29:51 AM
If that's talking shit, then I'm the walking version of an enema.

I hate to point out the obvious but in many cases, that's pretty much how you come across. :P
Title: Re: Callaway
Post by: The Member Formerly Known As Sophist on December 26, 2009, 07:48:43 AM
So, Shleed, you have an issue with Callaway for her supposed naivety when it's something that can't be helped?? Is that really fair?

I'm just as naive and gullible. --And yes, I did find it to be in the dictionary...
Title: Re: Callaway
Post by: Frolic_Fun on December 26, 2009, 08:37:40 AM
I have no issue with it, just making an observation. I can be just as naive at times, but I try not to online.

Couldn't care less if someone thinks it's wrong, only opinion at the end of the day. :zoinks:
Title: Re: Callaway
Post by: odeon on December 26, 2009, 09:18:16 AM
Isn't everything?
Title: Re: Callaway
Post by: El on December 26, 2009, 10:55:50 AM
Isn't everything?
Everything except chuck norris.
Title: Re: Callaway
Post by: Scrapheap on December 26, 2009, 03:57:26 PM
I've lost every game of pool I've ever played

I make no apologies for being shit at pool or or low intelligence

Give Soph some time and the truth finally comes out.
Title: Re: Callaway
Post by: Adam on December 26, 2009, 03:59:17 PM
:(
Title: Re: Callaway
Post by: odeon on December 26, 2009, 05:13:38 PM
Isn't everything?
Everything except chuck norris.

Ah, yes, the only constant in life.
Title: Re: Callaway
Post by: Al Swearegen on December 26, 2009, 09:15:04 PM
I've lost every game of pool I've ever played

I make no apologies for being shit at pool or or low intelligence

Give Soph some time and the truth finally comes out.

Awesome. I think I have my new signature  >:D
Title: Re: Callaway
Post by: P7PSP on August 15, 2010, 04:03:27 AM
I've lost every game of pool I've ever played

I make no apologies for being shit at pool or or low intelligence

Give Soph some time and the truth finally comes out.

Awesome. I think I have my new signature  >:D
That sig line cracks me up every time I see a post by you Sir Les.  :clap:
Title: Re: Callaway
Post by: Al Swearegen on August 15, 2010, 04:43:33 AM
I am nothing if not an opportunist.
I am looking for another to take the place of it.
Title: Re: Callaway
Post by: The_Chosen_One on August 15, 2010, 10:08:49 AM
I am nothing if not an opportunist.
I am looking for another to take the place of it.

There will be another one along any minute, as the conductor said to the passenger.