Here's the thing, though: what if other people want to comment? At I2, locking threads is considered to be cowardly. If you had bothered to read some of the past posts here, or maybe the welcoming message, you might have made the connection.
This is not Kansas anymore, buttercups.
Alas, I was forced to accept reality. Fury Road was not going to be a movie made for men. It was going to be a feminist piece of propaganda posing as a guy flick. And like “1886: The Order” I would be let down, and would have to pin my hopes on something else.
The real issue is not whether Hollywood has the audacity to remove the name sake of a movie franchise called MAD FREAKING MAX, and replace it with an impossible female character in an effort to kowtow to feminism.
It’s whether men in America and around the world are going to be duped by explosions, fire tornadoes, and desert raiders into seeing what is guaranteed to be nothing more than feminist propaganda, while at the same time being insulted AND tricked into viewing a piece of American culture ruined and rewritten right in front of their very eyes.
Which is close to you, God! I travel around, but you closer to God, you are my songs, my God! Fashion sun go down in the darkness of my stone, even if you are homeless. But the Lord; Clement told me everything. My angels to watch Bethel sanctions, he invited me and my peace I hvalenyy is so bright; As a result, this part of the fun of the wing or my problem in the sky, the sun, the moon, the stars and my music, my music, my God, you will be at least another memorable flying close to God! Fashion sun go down in the darkness of my stone, even if you are homeless. But the Lord; Clement told me everything. Or Billie Jean heaven that I am who I am, but I have children of my son who, he said, but the kid is not my son, not just a girl who claims that I was not sincere.
H
H E
H E Y
H E Y A
H E Y A L
H E Y A L H
H E Y A L H O
H E Y A L H O W
H E Y A L H O W S
H E Y A L H O W S I
H E Y A L H O W S I T
H E Y A L H O W S I T G
H E Y A L H O W S I T G O
H E Y A L H O W S I T G O I
H E Y A L H O W S I T G O I N
H E Y A L H O W S I T G O I N S
H E Y A L H O W S I T G O I N S O
H E Y A L H O W S I T G O I N S O F
H E Y A L H O W S I T G O I N S O F A
H E Y A L H O W S I T G O I N S O F A R
H
H E
H E Y
H E Y A
H E Y A L
H E Y A L H
H E Y A L H O
H E Y A L H O W
H E Y A L H O W S
H E Y A L H O W S I
H E Y A L H O W S I T
H E Y A L H O W S I T G
H E Y A L H O W S I T G O
H E Y A L H O W S I T G O I
H E Y A L H O W S I T G O I N
H E Y A L H O W S I T G O I N S
H E Y A L H O W S I T G O I N S O
H E Y A L H O W S I T G O I N S O F
H E Y A L H O W S I T G O I N S O F A
H E Y A L H O W S I T G O I N S O F A R
H E Y A
H E Y A L
H E Y A L H
H E Y A L H O
H E Y A L H O W
H E Y A L H O W S
H E Y A L H O W S I
H E Y A L H O W S I T
H E Y A L H O W S I T G
H E Y A L H O W S I T G O
H E Y A L H O W S I T G O I
H E Y A L H O W S I T G O I N
H E Y A L H O W S I T G O I N S
H E Y A L H O W S I T G O I N S O
H E Y A L H O W S I T G O I N S O F
H E Y A L H O W S I T G O I N S O F A
H E Y A L H O W S I T G O I N S O F A R
H
H E
H E Y
H E Y A
H E Y A L
H E Y A L H
H E Y A L H O
H E Y A L H O W
H E Y A L H O W S
H E Y A L H O W S I
H E Y A L H O W S I T
H E Y A L H O W S I T G
H E Y A L H O W S I T G O
H E Y A L H O W S I T G O I
H E Y A L H O W S I T G O I N
H E Y A L H O W S I T G O I N S
H E Y A L H O W S I T G O I N S O
H E Y A L H O W S I T G O I N S O F
H E Y A L H O W S I T G O I N S O F A
H E Y A L H O W S I T G O I N S O F A R
H E Y A
H E Y A L
H E Y A L H
H E Y A L H O
H E Y A L H O W
H E Y A L H O W S
H E Y A L H O W S I
H E Y A L H O W S I T
H E Y A L H O W S I T G
H E Y A L H O W S I T G O
H E Y A L H O W S I T G O I
H E Y A L H O W S I T G O I N
H E Y A L H O W S I T G O I N S
H E Y A L H O W S I T G O I N S O
H E Y A L H O W S I T G O I N S O F
H E Y A L H O W S I T G O I N S O F A
H E Y A L H O W S I T G O I N S O F A R
H E Y A L H
H E Y A L H O
H E Y A L H O W
H E Y A L H O W S
H E Y A L H O W S I
H E Y A L H O W S I T
H E Y A L H O W S I T G
H E Y A L H O W S I T G O
H E Y A L H O W S I T G O I
H E Y A L H O W S I T G O I N
H E Y A L H O W S I T G O I N S
H E Y A L H O W S I T G O I N S O
H E Y A L H O W S I T G O I N S O F
H E Y A L H O W S I T G O I N S O F A
H E Y A L H O W S I T G O I N S O F A R
H
H E
H E Y
H E Y A
H E Y A L
H E Y A L H
H E Y A L H O
H E Y A L H O W
H E Y A L H O W S
H E Y A L H O W S I
H E Y A L H O W S I T
H E Y A L H O W S I T G
H E Y A L H O W S I T G O
H E Y A L H O W S I T G O I
H E Y A L H O W S I T G O I N
H E Y A L H O W S I T G O I N S
H E Y A L H O W S I T G O I N S O
H E Y A L H O W S I T G O I N S O F
H E Y A L H O W S I T G O I N S O F A
H E Y A L H O W S I T G O I N S O F A R
H E Y A
H E Y A L
H E Y A L H
H E Y A L H O
H E Y A L H O W
H E Y A L H O W S
H E Y A L H O W S I
H E Y A L H O W S I T
H E Y A L H O W S I T G
H E Y A L H O W S I T G O
H E Y A L H O W S I T G O I
H E Y A L H O W S I T G O I N
H E Y A L H O W S I T G O I N S
H E Y A L H O W S I T G O I N S O
H E Y A L H O W S I T G O I N S O F
H E Y A L H O W S I T G O I N S O F A
H E Y A L H O W S I T G O I N S O F A R
H E Y A L H
H E Y A L H O
H E Y A L H O W
H E Y A L H O W S
H E Y A L H O W S I
H E Y A L H O W S I T
H E Y A L H O W S I T G
H E Y A L H O W S I T G O
H E Y A L H O W S I T G O I
H E Y A L H O W S I T G O I N
H E Y A L H O W S I T G O I N S
H E Y A L H O W S I T G O I N S O
H E Y A L H O W S I T G O I N S O F
H E Y A L H O W S I T G O I N S O F A
H E Y A L H O W S I T G O I N S O F A R
H E Y A L H O W S I
H E Y A L H O W S I T
H E Y A L H O W S I T G
H E Y A L H O W S I T G O
H E Y A L H O W S I T G O I
H E Y A L H O W S I T G O I N
H E Y A L H O W S I T G O I N S
H E Y A L H O W S I T G O I N S O
H E Y A L H O W S I T G O I N S O F
H E Y A L H O W S I T G O I N S O F A
H E Y A L H O W S I T G O I N S O F A R
H
H E
H E Y
H E Y A
H E Y A L
H E Y A L H
H E Y A L H O
H E Y A L H O W
H E Y A L H O W S
H E Y A L H O W S I
H E Y A L H O W S I T
H E Y A L H O W S I T G
H E Y A L H O W S I T G O
H E Y A L H O W S I T G O I
H E Y A L H O W S I T G O I N
H E Y A L H O W S I T G O I N S
H E Y A L H O W S I T G O I N S O
H E Y A L H O W S I T G O I N S O F
H E Y A L H O W S I T G O I N S O F A
H E Y A L H O W S I T G O I N S O F A R
H E Y A
H E Y A L
H E Y A L H
H E Y A L H O
H E Y A L H O W
H E Y A L H O W S
H E Y A L H O W S I
H E Y A L H O W S I T
H E Y A L H O W S I T G
H E Y A L H O W S I T G O
H E Y A L H O W S I T G O I
H E Y A L H O W S I T G O I N
H E Y A L H O W S I T G O I N S
H E Y A L H O W S I T G O I N S O
H E Y A L H O W S I T G O I N S O F
H E Y A L H O W S I T G O I N S O F A
H E Y A L H O W S I T G O I N S O F A R
H E Y A L H
H E Y A L H O
H E Y A L H O W
H E Y A L H O W S
H E Y A L H O W S I
H E Y A L H O W S I T
H E Y A L H O W S I T G
H E Y A L H O W S I T G O
H E Y A L H O W S I T G O I
H E Y A L H O W S I T G O I N
H E Y A L H O W S I T G O I N S
H E Y A L H O W S I T G O I N S O
H E Y A L H O W S I T G O I N S O F
H E Y A L H O W S I T G O I N S O F A
H E Y A L H O W S I T G O I N S O F A R
H E Y A L H O W S I
H E Y A L H O W S I T
H E Y A L H O W S I T G
H E Y A L H O W S I T G O
H E Y A L H O W S I T G O I
H E Y A L H O W S I T G O I N
H E Y A L H O W S I T G O I N S
H E Y A L H O W S I T G O I N S O
H E Y A L H O W S I T G O I N S O F
H E Y A L H O W S I T G O I N S O F A
H E Y A L H O W S I T G O I N S O F A R
H E Y A L H O W S I T G
H E Y A L H O W S I T G O
H E Y A L H O W S I T G O I
H E Y A L H O W S I T G O I N
H E Y A L H O W S I T G O I N S
H E Y A L H O W S I T G O I N S O
H E Y A L H O W S I T G O I N S O F
H E Y A L H O W S I T G O I N S O F A
H E Y A L H O W S I T G O I N S O F A R
H
H E
H E Y
H E Y A
H E Y A L
H E Y A L H
H E Y A L H O
H E Y A L H O W
H E Y A L H O W S
H E Y A L H O W S I
H E Y A L H O W S I T
H E Y A L H O W S I T G
H E Y A L H O W S I T G O
H E Y A L H O W S I T G O I
H E Y A L H O W S I T G O I N
H E Y A L H O W S I T G O I N S
H E Y A L H O W S I T G O I N S O
H E Y A L H O W S I T G O I N S O F
H E Y A L H O W S I T G O I N S O F A
H E Y A L H O W S I T G O I N S O F A R
H E Y A
H E Y A L
H E Y A L H
H E Y A L H O
H E Y A L H O W
H E Y A L H O W S
H E Y A L H O W S I
H E Y A L H O W S I T
H E Y A L H O W S I T G
H E Y A L H O W S I T G O
H E Y A L H O W S I T G O I
H E Y A L H O W S I T G O I N
H E Y A L H O W S I T G O I N S
H E Y A L H O W S I T G O I N S O
H E Y A L H O W S I T G O I N S O F
H E Y A L H O W S I T G O I N S O F A
H E Y A L H O W S I T G O I N S O F A R
H E Y A L H
H E Y A L H O
H E Y A L H O W
H E Y A L H O W S
H E Y A L H O W S I
H E Y A L H O W S I T
H E Y A L H O W S I T G
H E Y A L H O W S I T G O
H E Y A L H O W S I T G O I
H E Y A L H O W S I T G O I N
H E Y A L H O W S I T G O I N S
H E Y A L H O W S I T G O I N S O
H E Y A L H O W S I T G O I N S O F
H E Y A L H O W S I T G O I N S O F A
H E Y A L H O W S I T G O I N S O F A R
H E Y A L H O W S I
H E Y A L H O W S I T
H E Y A L H O W S I T G
H E Y A L H O W S I T G O
H E Y A L H O W S I T G O I
H E Y A L H O W S I T G O I N
H E Y A L H O W S I T G O I N S
H E Y A L H O W S I T G O I N S O
H E Y A L H O W S I T G O I N S O F
H E Y A L H O W S I T G O I N S O F A
H E Y A L H O W S I T G O I N S O F A R
H E Y A L H O W S I T G
H E Y A L H O W S I T G O
H E Y A L H O W S I T G O I
H E Y A L H O W S I T G O I N
H E Y A L H O W S I T G O I N S
H E Y A L H O W S I T G O I N S O
H E Y A L H O W S I T G O I N S O F
H E Y A L H O W S I T G O I N S O F A
H E Y A L H O W S I T G O I N S O F A R
H E Y A L H O W S I T G O I N S
H E Y A L H O W S I T G O I N S O
H E Y A L H O W S I T G O I N S O F
H E Y A L H O W S I T G O I N S O F A
H E Y A L H O W S I T G O I N S O F A R
I don't engage in call-outs, because call-outs follow an allready pre-set premise
You actually think you can drag me to a call-out thread :D How fucking deluded can you possibly be?
"So there we have it", you said, after copypasting something that everyone can read :D
You are a bit of a control freak, aren't you (let me guess - it crashed your stupid marriage)
Then you run, like a little child, to quote what Odeon said... who cares what he said? :D He has yet to unlock my thread, something I kindov expected by now. I actually expected you to flip your control-freaky lid once you saw that my thread was locked - and tadaa!
Did your fingers itch terribly?
The thread he wrote that on is locked.
http://www.intensitysquared.com/index.php/topic,17590.msg763157.html#msg763157
and here is what Odeon said onceQuoteHere's the thing, though: what if other people want to comment? At I2, locking threads is considered to be cowardly. If you had bothered to read some of the past posts here, or maybe the welcoming message, you might have made the connection.
This is not Kansas anymore, buttercups.
You know, admitting a mistake isn't as bad as you think.
Try it
once gotta be the first, no?
No?
Never?
Never, ever, ever?
you are locked in your insecure compulsion to not be wrong - ever.
Oh, of course - you are incapable. You don't have the strength.
You never had.
If you are this old - and this incapable of it, you're never going to be able to.
Your gravestone: "Was never able to admit error."
Apology accepted.
I apologise for being an arsehole back then too. I rode you guys pretty hard and saw it all as fair game. Last couple of days has got me reading back on a lot of these threads.
I don't remember the reasons for me getting so pissed off with you both to begin with. I doubt I would go on the rampage against anyone as much as I did then.
Maybe I have mellowed a bit and maybe that is not a bad thing. Certainly looking at it with the distance of time and it is pretty bad form.
I had a fair bit of shit going on in my life then and maybe more than a little spilled over. It is a reason rather than an excuse and not a justified reason at that.
Again Bint (and Adam) my apologies.
OK how about we just summarise our points and our conceded points and stick a fork in this one. No more quotes. One more introduced post and I think my eyes will bleed.
OK here is me.
Firstly you are right that this technicality that defines in your view Richard's treatment as different from Duke's is still in my view a minor one and not worth deserving of different treatment. It is like trying to tell me that there is huge difference between horses and zebras. Sorry but to me one looks very much like the other and the differences are not that great. I understand you see the difference and it being a big enough one. Just I don't.
Secondly you say Oh people just ignored him. That is not "quite" right. Some people who knew what they were doing went straight to the ignoring option of their choice. Many fumbled. For some the adblock thing was effective and for others the ignore option and others a different option. Some found problems with different options and discussed it in the forums. He was effectively ruining their interaction on the board every bit as much as Duke's spamming. Some did not bother with ignoring. Some because they had a personal issue against ignoring people and too stubborn to recant this position (OK yes there was only likely one person here fitting that description and I think we all know who that is) and others because they were either OK with it or rather than go to the bother and inconveniences the different options of ignore pose, chose to grit their teeth and hope that he changed it back to his ugly mug.
There was more than just a easy ignore things are solved.
Thirdly Richard has been pretty quick at saying crappy things about kids of members here. Particularly QV's child. (Oh he said he hopes mine die from a kangaroo in this thread. No worse really than Bint's pedophilia incest fantasies she had about me and my kids a while ago. I just point the comment out as another easy to reference example) and a few other places has taken shots. He then tells people to lighten up and that it was of no consequence. In fact that tends to be his default. No accountability, respect or responsibility and at every point and turn fault lies with others.
Fourthly it is not that I particularly dislike Richard that I bring this to light. It is his actions and behaviours that bring it to bear. Now the problem in showing this is that firstly, if he is the type of personality that generally grates on me I will react and as such it may or may not show me as "having a problem with that person. Therefore biased against them. The other point too is the type of crappy actions they do is more likely if they have a crappy underlying personality to start with. I could we imagine Sol, Ahayes, General Razordbeard and a host of others do essentially the same or worse than Rixhard or Duke but would have a very hard time imagining Parts or Callaway doing so. So therefore the "You are just saying this because you don't like" them is a seductive argument, but just not true.
Fifthly I think that I DID misread your posts to him and the context of it as different to what they were meant by you to express. Things happen in a fluid state and when there are context and subtext to factor, sometimes I get it wrong. It did not really bother me either way, whether you wanted him to stay or not or induced him to change his mind (overtly or not). Doesn't really change what he did or what he is like as a person or what you are like or what this board is like...BUT I do think it needs to be said that in this I got the wrong end of the stick and I apologise for that.
To be perfectly honest Odeon I don't think that we are going to see eye to eye over this point. I see what you are saying but I don't agree with it. You think the same of me and God knows we have tried to sway the other.
Thanks Odeon this was kind of interesting
In all honesty, I do not really feel up to the debate.
I think that given the parameters of the debate, My need to show Adam that he is unable to contextualise these things, I have not shown this.
Adam makes some decent points specifically about Iraq. Points that I think are right.
OK I do think that he started with a specific callout and then worked to narrowing the debate into Iraq society. Redefine his terms of his own callout somewhat.
Even so when you find yourself tipping your hat to some of the points your opponent makes I don't think you should take a different tact and try to smear it with misdirection or technicality.
I had a bad week and the callout timing not great. It also was not a debate I was overly interested in having.
Adam CAN back his shit up, which I commend. I don't nor will not agree with everything but there were a few gems in there and it does actual give me, in respect to Iraq, a new perception. That is good. I like learning.
I am happy for Adam to be winner and I am completely unmotivated to fight it out
....
If I allready know about this, how do you suppose I didn't know there are liberal muslims? I've been called a "muslim lover" on THIS forum, for claiming there are moderate, liberal muslims - YOU know this, but you disregard it out of manipulative tactic.
Dishonesty, that's why you think of this word, you are projecting.....
The more anti-islamic you identify yourself, coincidentally, the more conservative you are as well, which indicentally makes you anti-feminist, which in the end renders you someone pretty damn similar to muslims. So why does this go back to being against muslim infestation of the west?
Why do anti-feminist neo-conservatives not welcome islam, and the "culture change" they fear so strongly, if this culture-change is exactly what they want to begin with? Islamic culture, as "advertised" by racists, consist of shutting women up, pulling them out of work, and raising boys to be strong, bad men. This is EXACTLY what people like Breivik wants for Norway - hell, he even explains that this would give us a better long term edge against the muslims - precisely because we emulate them.
So... what's up :I
because they EXIST and you can read about them - in the links^
That's right. Anti-Islamic sentiment exists in lots of places, among lots of different groups and different peoples. We can call them conservatives or atheists or greeks or women or americans or whatever because it's prolific. So, yeah, I think we're done.
Yes bigotry exists in all diversities.
See? You DO get it.
And that confirms it - you were only battling with your compulsion to never "surrender"
what a pathetic piece of shit
"out of character"?
This isn't out of character. You've seen me treat Richard like this.
You are now Richard.
Think what you want old fart :autism:Sure.
There is no call-out.
Well, the calling is there, the answer does not answer the words of the call-out though.
The loss of control, the lying, the spin doctoring, trying to control the narrative, spamming, locking threads, participating in a callout though you said you weren't going to, the ad homs....all comes down to one thing.
You can not accept when your opinion is crap and you are called on it. It was not just wrong, it was ridiculous.
I know you say otherwise but the above shows otherwise. It shows a dishonesty and a bankruptcy of intellect.
Maybe stick with drawing dinosaurs (was that you even?) and smoking bongs. You do well at that druggie hipster thing, you have going on. You wear it well. If you really want to talk about things that are a bit deeper, perhaps put down the bomb for a bit or don't chimp out when disagreed with. We do not have to humour dishonest or bullshit. I certainly won't.
You are generally an okay guy. You came off as an A grade asshat here. Out of character. Me? I am an arsehole all the time, so meh.
Nobody gives a shit Al :zoinks: