INTENSITY²

Arena for the Competitive => Main Event Callouts => Topic started by: Zippo on February 02, 2012, 12:07:57 AM

Title: Émile Armand
Post by: Zippo on February 02, 2012, 12:07:57 AM
explain your obvious hate and assumptions and stereotypes about americans and the english.

since when were all americans gun loving republicans. i know plenty of them who dont like firearms...

while your at it explain why you think i should be permitted to handle or even be near firearms.

i expect logical arguments and nothing stupid like the shit you have been spewing with your trollish comments

English people are notorious for having bad teeth.


American Police hahaha


What is it about Americans and guns? If you have behavioral problems, you should not be allowed around guns or taught about guns.

The Vatican is not in France so I do not understand the point you are trying to make. The Vatican is in Rome, Italy.  The Vatican is an independent state but is surrounded by Rome. The Vatican is in 'euroland' if that is what you want to call Europe?

My family is not Roman Catholic. I was raised in a secular household but my mother parent's were Lutherans and my father parent's were Jews. I was not molested by anyone in the Vatican nor have I been there. Why do you stereotype the Catholics but get upset when I stereotyped you?

explain: why do you stereotype others so much and than yet expect them to do no less to you?
Title: Re: Émile Armand
Post by: eris on February 02, 2012, 01:26:55 AM
the american police are a joke
Title: Re: Émile Armand
Post by: Émile Armand on February 02, 2012, 03:19:24 PM
explain your obvious hate and assumptions and stereotypes about americans and the english.
Excuse me?

Quote
since when were all americans gun loving republicans. i know plenty of them who dont like firearms...
I never made that claim.

Quote
while your at it explain why you think i should be permitted to handle or even be near firearms.
You do not seem to be rational. I feel that if someone gets upset as you do over nothing, then it would be in the best interest of the people to prevent you from handling guns.

Quote
i expect logical arguments and nothing stupid like the shit you have been spewing with your trollish comments
There is nothing to argue about. Why are you so sensitive?

Quote
explain: why do you stereotype others so much and than yet expect them to do no less to you?
Did I not just ask you the same exact question?
Title: Re: Émile Armand
Post by: Zippo on February 02, 2012, 08:27:35 PM
please note i was having a bad day yesterday and i was pissed off at the time of writing those comments.
that aside. let us continue.


Excuse me?
everything you said was quoted in the above post. and with the comments that you made and the amount you make them i would be foolish not to thing you have something against them.
I never made that claim.

i believe you did, not only just now in chat but in one of the above quotes attached is the screenshot of the chat.

 
You do not seem to be rational. I feel that if someone gets upset as you do over nothing, then it would be in the best interest of the people to prevent you from handling guns.


i have my moments of anger. rare as they are they happen with everyone else. what you said simply just pushed me over the edge in a bad day. just like im sure everyone else has had happen to them at some point in there lives.

There is nothing to argue about. Why are you so sensitive?

if there is nothing to argue about than why are you continuing the argument? im not generally a sensitive guy. i come online and have fun with friends. i ocasionally bitch about my life to said friends. if you know me in real life though chances are that you wont hear a word of how im feeling regardless of who you are.

 
Did I not just ask you the same exact question?
yes you did. and i believe i answered it as well.

i was simply responding to your stereotype with a stereotype. i never made a stereotype beyond sarcasm before that.


i would appreciate that you try not dodging questions now.
Title: Re: Émile Armand
Post by: Émile Armand on February 02, 2012, 09:37:20 PM
I am supposed to detect your sarcasm but not the other way around?
Title: Re: Émile Armand
Post by: skyblue1 on February 02, 2012, 09:47:41 PM
Gun-Loving Democrat here, I am pretty sure this will be my next purchase

(http://i297.photobucket.com/albums/mm223/skyblue1110/513ULB3_1.jpg)
RAGING JUDGE ULTRA-LITE® REVOLVER - .410 GA. OR .45 COLT - 7-SHOT
Title: Re: Émile Armand
Post by: Zippo on February 02, 2012, 11:39:13 PM
I am supposed to detect your sarcasm but not the other way around?

stop deflecting the questions.
Title: Re: Émile Armand
Post by: Zippo on February 02, 2012, 11:40:37 PM
Gun-Loving Democrat here, I am pretty sure this will be my next purchase

(http://i297.photobucket.com/albums/mm223/skyblue1110/513ULB3_1.jpg)
RAGING JUDGE ULTRA-LITE® REVOLVER - .410 GA. OR .45 COLT - 7-SHOT

i lurve that! seems awesome as fuck. would be dificult to get a decent shot off with that though. would be hard to use anywhere but a range.
Title: Re: Émile Armand
Post by: Émile Armand on February 03, 2012, 12:02:39 PM
please note i was having a bad day yesterday and i was pissed off at the time of writing those comments.
that aside. let us continue.
Irrelevant.

everything you said was quoted in the above post. and with the comments that you made and the amount you make them i would be foolish not to thing you have something against them.
You wrote that I have "obvious hate" towards Americans and the English. You made a claim and did not support your claim.

i believe you did, not only just now in chat but in one of the above quotes attached is the screenshot of the chat.
I never made the claim that  "all americans [are] gun loving republicans."

i have my moments of anger. rare as they are they happen with everyone else. what you said simply just pushed me over the edge in a bad day. just like im sure everyone else has had happen to them at some point in there lives.
If what I wrote seriously pushed you over the edge, then you should not be allowed to handle a gun. You are unpredictable and if some words someone wrote on the internet pisses you off that badly. Then it is reasonable to believe you should not have access to guns, which can kill people easily. You lack self-control.

if there is nothing to argue about than why are you continuing the argument? im not generally a sensitive guy. i come online and have fun with friends. i ocasionally bitch about my life to said friends. if you know me in real life though chances are that you wont hear a word of how im feeling regardless of who you are.
Silly.

yes you did. and i believe i answered it as well.

i was simply responding to your stereotype with a stereotype. i never made a stereotype beyond sarcasm before that.

i would appreciate that you try not dodging questions now.
Stop dodging the question.
Title: Re: Émile Armand
Post by: Zippo on February 03, 2012, 03:00:55 PM

Irrelevant.

as far as my reaction to you the day before yesterday, anything but.


You wrote that I have "obvious hate" towards Americans and the English. You made a claim and did not support your claim.
you would be a fool to not think you have something against them with the amount of times you have spit out the stereotypes you do. the support was in the quotes i made of you at the top of the post. go read them.

i believe you did, not only just now in chat but in one of the above quotes attached is the screenshot of the chat.
I never made the claim that  "all americans [are] gun loving republicans."
[/quote] you made a claim that all americans love there bibles and there guns. you have been quoted and i have screenshots of you saying that. multiple times.  so stop pretending like it did not happen.



If what I wrote seriously pushed you over the edge, then you should not be allowed to handle a gun. You are unpredictable and if some words someone wrote on the internet pisses you off that badly. Then it is reasonable to believe you should not have access to guns, which can kill people easily. You lack self-control.

in case you had not noticed people [myself being one of them] are quite more often than not a lot more forward on the internet than they are in real life. now you have an opinion thats your right but the post you made insulting me in the thread stating i want to join the navy was only your third post in intensity and obviously worded to get me going. you were trying to upset me. its plane and simple. how i act in real life is not how i act on the internet. had you said the same thing to me IRL i would have flipped you off and walked away. nothing more nothing less.


Silly.

not really silly at all. just how i am.


Stop dodging the question.

this isnt about me its about you. so sit down and shut the fuck up if your not going to say anything worth while.
Title: Re: Émile Armand
Post by: the_ruckus on February 03, 2012, 03:04:06 PM
Gun-Loving Democrat here, I am pretty sure this will be my next purchase

(http://i297.photobucket.com/albums/mm223/skyblue1110/513ULB3_1.jpg)
RAGING JUDGE ULTRA-LITE® REVOLVER - .410 GA. OR .45 COLT - 7-SHOT

make sure you keep at least one .45 round loaded at all times, otherwise it's considered a short-barrelled shotgun which is illegal in a lot of places.
Title: Re: Émile Armand
Post by: Émile Armand on February 03, 2012, 04:04:06 PM
You have made the claim that I wrote "all americans love there bibles and there guns" and that "all americans [are] gun loving republicans."

You have not provided any evidence that I have made either of those claims.

All you have provided is ad-hominems and straw mans.
Title: Re: Émile Armand
Post by: odeon on February 03, 2012, 05:00:46 PM
:yawn:

Troll.
Title: Re: Émile Armand
Post by: midlifeaspie on February 03, 2012, 05:07:34 PM
Can't I2 at least get good trolls?  These obvious boring ones are beneath us.  :(
Title: Re: Émile Armand
Post by: odeon on February 03, 2012, 05:09:32 PM
My guess is that this isn't a new one.
Title: Re: Émile Armand
Post by: midlifeaspie on February 03, 2012, 05:12:12 PM
My guess is that this isn't a new one.

What gave him away?  The nation baiting? ;)
Title: Re: Émile Armand
Post by: odeon on February 03, 2012, 05:12:44 PM
Oh, just a hunch. :tard:
Title: Re: Émile Armand
Post by: Zippo on February 03, 2012, 05:30:41 PM
was going to just open this up. i give up. hes obviously trolling. im just going to put him on ignore. dont give a fuck anymore.
Title: Re: Émile Armand
Post by: odeon on February 03, 2012, 05:48:21 PM
Well, sorry about posting in your callout, but he was trolling and you took the bait.
Title: Re: Émile Armand
Post by: Zippo on February 03, 2012, 07:21:43 PM
Well, sorry about posting in your callout, but he was trolling and you took the bait.

not worried about it. i took the bate because i was allready stressed pissed off that night. i continued the callout out of stubourness and refusal to give up rather than out of anger. squid and butterflies were saying hes not a troll and i decided to take that opinion over my own even though i knew better. meh what ever trolls will troll.
Title: Re: Émile Armand
Post by: Phallacy on February 03, 2012, 10:54:07 PM
Is this a guy named Emile? :zoinks:
Title: Re: Émile Armand
Post by: Queen Victoria on February 03, 2012, 11:02:52 PM
Is this a guy named Emile? :zoinks:
\

Yeah, it's pronounced just as if you were going to eat "a meal"
Title: Re: Émile Armand
Post by: Calavera on February 03, 2012, 11:35:05 PM
He sounds like buttcoffee, and the way Squidusa and Butterflies keep defending him (albeit subtly) makes me suspect (maybe wrongly) they know who he is.
Title: Re: Émile Armand
Post by: Émile Armand on February 04, 2012, 03:15:58 AM
Hiding behind the moderator.

sigh...
Title: Re: Émile Armand
Post by: odeon on February 04, 2012, 03:19:01 AM
Well, sorry about posting in your callout, but he was trolling and you took the bait.

not worried about it. i took the bate because i was allready stressed pissed off that night. i continued the callout out of stubourness and refusal to give up rather than out of anger. squid and butterflies were saying hes not a troll and i decided to take that opinion over my own even though i knew better. meh what ever trolls will troll.

I think Squid and Butterflies both missed the obvious signs.  :-\
Title: Re: Émile Armand
Post by: odeon on February 04, 2012, 03:20:16 AM
He sounds like buttcoffee, and the way Squidusa and Butterflies keep defending him (albeit subtly) makes me suspect (maybe wrongly) they know who he is.

Well, the thought did cross my mind, but why would they?
Title: Re: Émile Armand
Post by: odeon on February 04, 2012, 03:23:18 AM
Hiding behind the moderator.

sigh...

So, who are you, really?
Title: Re: Émile Armand
Post by: Émile Armand on February 04, 2012, 04:24:09 AM
Me and Zippo are having a discussion. I would like to continue my discussion without him hiding behind a moderator.

My discussion with him is none of your concern. I do not see why you are asking irrelevant questions. 

Let me and Zippo discuss the matters without interference. Is that okay?
Title: Re: Émile Armand
Post by: Al Swearegen on February 04, 2012, 04:34:10 AM
He sounds like buttcoffee, and the way Squidusa and Butterflies keep defending him (albeit subtly) makes me suspect (maybe wrongly) they know who he is.

Well, the thought did cross my mind, but why would they?

At a wild uneducated guess I could say that buttcoffee is now a bit of a regular on Spasticity and is not trolling there and they want him to cause trouble here like he has in the past for lulz, whilst trying to hide cowardly behind the "we did not know it was him" premise.

I don't know of course. I have no idea. That is mere guess.

I like Emile. He is amusing.
Title: Re: Émile Armand
Post by: Émile Armand on February 04, 2012, 05:33:10 AM
He sounds like buttcoffee, and the way Squidusa and Butterflies keep defending him (albeit subtly) makes me suspect (maybe wrongly) they know who he is.

Well, the thought did cross my mind, but why would they?

At a wild uneducated guess I could say that buttcoffee is now a bit of a regular on Spasticity and is not trolling there and they want him to cause trouble here like he has in the past for lulz, whilst trying to hide cowardly behind the "we did not know it was him" premise.

I don't know of course. I have no idea. That is mere guess.

I like Emile. He is amusing.
Are you the bitch? Report back to Alex asap.

Top secret info has been passed
Title: Re: Émile Armand
Post by: Al Swearegen on February 04, 2012, 06:35:41 AM
He sounds like buttcoffee, and the way Squidusa and Butterflies keep defending him (albeit subtly) makes me suspect (maybe wrongly) they know who he is.

Well, the thought did cross my mind, but why would they?

At a wild uneducated guess I could say that buttcoffee is now a bit of a regular on Spasticity and is not trolling there and they want him to cause trouble here like he has in the past for lulz, whilst trying to hide cowardly behind the "we did not know it was him" premise.

I don't know of course. I have no idea. That is mere guess.

I like Emile. He is amusing.
Are you the bitch? Report back to Alex asap.

Top secret info has been passed

Report to Alex? Alex who? Do not say Alex Plank because everyone here knows that me and him do not exactly see eye to eye and I have been banned arguably more times than anyone else on here (Adam may give me a run for my money) and am on a shoot on sight directive and disliked by all the mods past and present there (more or less)....but go on you were about to enlighten us.
Title: Re: Émile Armand
Post by: odeon on February 04, 2012, 10:25:25 AM
Me and Zippo are having a discussion. I would like to continue my discussion without him hiding behind a moderator.

My discussion with him is none of your concern. I do not see why you are asking irrelevant questions. 

Let me and Zippo discuss the matters without interference. Is that okay?

No, it's not. You are a troll and therefore my problem.
Title: Re: Émile Armand
Post by: Adam on February 04, 2012, 11:58:56 AM
To be fair, it would only be your problem if he was spamming or doing something against the rules. Being a troll isn't against the rules, is it? So he should be able to talk to zippo himself

Les I've lost track of the number of times I've been banned from wp lol, I dunno which of us would win that title :laugh:
Title: Re: Émile Armand
Post by: odeon on February 04, 2012, 01:35:02 PM
To be fair, it would only be your problem if he was spamming or doing something against the rules. Being a troll isn't against the rules, is it? So he should be able to talk to zippo himself

Les I've lost track of the number of times I've been banned from wp lol, I dunno which of us would win that title :laugh:

Not necessarily my problem in an official capacity, but the thing is, I don't suffer fools. I like to see them suffer, though.
Title: Re: Émile Armand
Post by: 'Butterflies' on February 04, 2012, 01:37:56 PM
Buttcoffee is a regular on S2 and seems like a nice guy.

I have no reason to believe Emile is Buttcoffee.

I do not know if Emile is a troll, or not.

Even if he is a troll, he doesn't seem to be doing anything terrible, so I see no reason for me to be unpleasant to him.
Title: Re: Émile Armand
Post by: odeon on February 04, 2012, 01:40:13 PM
The two have a similar posting style when trolling. BC may be a nice guy at S2, but he wasn't it here. Whenever I catch him, he is out.
Title: Re: Émile Armand
Post by: Squidusa on February 04, 2012, 01:51:16 PM
Not necessarily my problem in an official capacity, but the thing is, I don't suffer fools. I like to see them suffer, though.

But isn't "fool" a very fluid term?
I'm sure each and every one of us is a fool in someone elses opinion.

Well, sorry about posting in your callout, but he was trolling and you took the bait.

not worried about it. i took the bate because i was allready stressed pissed off that night. i continued the callout out of stubourness and refusal to give up rather than out of anger. squid and butterflies were saying hes not a troll and i decided to take that opinion over my own even though i knew better. meh what ever trolls will troll.

I think Squid and Butterflies both missed the obvious signs.  :-\

I honestly did not think Emile was a troll at first , from what I gather his attitude towards americans aren't exactly uncommon in europe , hell I know a fair few british folk who have said what he said.

Tbh though , I have spoken to BC on spasticity and I have no issue with him so any obvious signs you will be looking for , I'm not going to bother to pay attention to , if Emile is him.
Title: Re: Émile Armand
Post by: odeon on February 04, 2012, 02:05:45 PM
Not necessarily my problem in an official capacity, but the thing is, I don't suffer fools. I like to see them suffer, though.

But isn't "fool" a very fluid term?
I'm sure each and every one of us is a fool in someone elses opinion.

Sure, and I'm going after the ones in my opinion.

Quote
Well, sorry about posting in your callout, but he was trolling and you took the bait.

not worried about it. i took the bate because i was allready stressed pissed off that night. i continued the callout out of stubourness and refusal to give up rather than out of anger. squid and butterflies were saying hes not a troll and i decided to take that opinion over my own even though i knew better. meh what ever trolls will troll.

I think Squid and Butterflies both missed the obvious signs.  :-\

I honestly did not think Emile was a troll at first , from what I gather his attitude towards americans aren't exactly uncommon in europe , hell I know a fair few british folk who have said what he said.

Tbh though , I have spoken to BC on spasticity and I have no issue with him so any obvious signs you will be looking for , I'm not going to bother to pay attention to , if Emile is him.

It took me two or three posts to realise he is a troll and around that many to realise he is someone we already know. As for the obvious signs, I am referring to his trolling. If you don't notice those, chances are you'll be troll fodder more than not.
Title: Re: Émile Armand
Post by: Émile Armand on February 04, 2012, 03:19:47 PM
Thread has been ended.

Discussion between two people is not allowed.
Title: Re: Émile Armand
Post by: odeon on February 04, 2012, 03:20:45 PM
Poor troll.
Title: Re: Émile Armand
Post by: Squidusa on February 04, 2012, 03:22:27 PM
Not necessarily my problem in an official capacity, but the thing is, I don't suffer fools. I like to see them suffer, though.

But isn't "fool" a very fluid term?
I'm sure each and every one of us is a fool in someone elses opinion.

Sure, and I'm going after the ones in my opinion.

Quote
Well, sorry about posting in your callout, but he was trolling and you took the bait.

not worried about it. i took the bate because i was allready stressed pissed off that night. i continued the callout out of stubourness and refusal to give up rather than out of anger. squid and butterflies were saying hes not a troll and i decided to take that opinion over my own even though i knew better. meh what ever trolls will troll.

I think Squid and Butterflies both missed the obvious signs.  :-\

I honestly did not think Emile was a troll at first , from what I gather his attitude towards americans aren't exactly uncommon in europe , hell I know a fair few british folk who have said what he said.

Tbh though , I have spoken to BC on spasticity and I have no issue with him so any obvious signs you will be looking for , I'm not going to bother to pay attention to , if Emile is him.

It took me two or three posts to realise he is a troll and around that many to realise he is someone we already know. As for the obvious signs, I am referring to his trolling. If you don't notice those, chances are you'll be troll fodder more than not.

Oh I'm not going to deny he's trolling now , it is quite obvious , I just hesitate to lable him "Buttcoffee" as you said the same about Pig and he was actually innocent.
Title: Re: Émile Armand
Post by: odeon on February 04, 2012, 03:24:25 PM
Not necessarily my problem in an official capacity, but the thing is, I don't suffer fools. I like to see them suffer, though.

But isn't "fool" a very fluid term?
I'm sure each and every one of us is a fool in someone elses opinion.

Sure, and I'm going after the ones in my opinion.

Quote
Well, sorry about posting in your callout, but he was trolling and you took the bait.

not worried about it. i took the bate because i was allready stressed pissed off that night. i continued the callout out of stubourness and refusal to give up rather than out of anger. squid and butterflies were saying hes not a troll and i decided to take that opinion over my own even though i knew better. meh what ever trolls will troll.

I think Squid and Butterflies both missed the obvious signs.  :-\

I honestly did not think Emile was a troll at first , from what I gather his attitude towards americans aren't exactly uncommon in europe , hell I know a fair few british folk who have said what he said.

Tbh though , I have spoken to BC on spasticity and I have no issue with him so any obvious signs you will be looking for , I'm not going to bother to pay attention to , if Emile is him.

It took me two or three posts to realise he is a troll and around that many to realise he is someone we already know. As for the obvious signs, I am referring to his trolling. If you don't notice those, chances are you'll be troll fodder more than not.

Oh I'm not going to deny he's trolling now , it is quite obvious , I just hesitate to lable him "Buttcoffee" as you said the same about Pig and he was actually innocent.

True. I'm not sure yet and I do make mistakes. I very much doubt I'm wrong about this one, but obviously I could be.
Title: Re: Émile Armand
Post by: Adam on February 04, 2012, 03:24:47 PM
Everybody's buttcoffee! :O
Title: Re: Émile Armand
Post by: Adam on February 04, 2012, 03:25:33 PM
He has a point though. Why can't he be allowed to speak to zippo on his own? It wasn't even Emile sho started the thread, it was zippo
Title: Re: Émile Armand
Post by: odeon on February 04, 2012, 03:26:29 PM
Teehee. Hasn't stopped you, has it?
Title: Re: Émile Armand
Post by: Adam on February 04, 2012, 03:27:54 PM
Hasn't stopped me what? I'm not the one arguing with Emile
Title: Re: Émile Armand
Post by: odeon on February 04, 2012, 04:15:16 PM
Posting in this thread now, or in other people's callouts in the past.
Title: Re: Émile Armand
Post by: Adam on February 04, 2012, 04:25:09 PM
thats a bit different. if you were allowing emile and zippo to have this callout themselves then id be staying out of it.
Title: Re: Émile Armand
Post by: Zippo on February 04, 2012, 08:54:30 PM
Me and Zippo are having a discussion. I would like to continue my discussion without him hiding behind a moderator.

My discussion with him is none of your concern. I do not see why you are asking irrelevant questions. 

Let me and Zippo discuss the matters without interference. Is that okay?

no we are not having a conversation. i ended it. now go to your corner, sit down and shut up.
Title: Re: Émile Armand
Post by: Émile Armand on February 04, 2012, 09:04:15 PM
Teehee. Hasn't stopped you, has it?
Ironic.
Title: Re: Émile Armand
Post by: Émile Armand on February 04, 2012, 09:05:11 PM
Posting in this thread now, or in other people's callouts in the past.
The Irony.
Title: Re: Émile Armand
Post by: Émile Armand on February 04, 2012, 09:06:28 PM
Me and Zippo are having a discussion. I would like to continue my discussion without him hiding behind a moderator.

My discussion with him is none of your concern. I do not see why you are asking irrelevant questions. 

Let me and Zippo discuss the matters without interference. Is that okay?

no we are not having a conversation. i ended it. now go to your corner, sit down and shut up.
I  thought we were. Now we are not. Why are you so upset?
Title: Re: Émile Armand
Post by: Émile Armand on February 04, 2012, 10:46:06 PM
Me and Zippo are having a discussion. I would like to continue my discussion without him hiding behind a moderator.

My discussion with him is none of your concern. I do not see why you are asking irrelevant questions. 

Let me and Zippo discuss the matters without interference. Is that okay?

No, it's not. You are a troll and therefore my problem.
This right here is pure gold. It is not okay to have a discussion with someone on this website. I am your problem? Are you serious? What did I read on the main page? I am having trouble understanding why the main page states what it states when none of it appears to be true.

You keep writing that you see me as a "troll" and how boring I am. It reminds me of Godwin's law, but instead of bringing up the nazis, you just call whoever a troll and write boring, when you or others cannot support their claims. It is admitting the obvious.
Title: Re: Émile Armand
Post by: Al Swearegen on February 05, 2012, 01:03:17 AM
To be fair, it would only be your problem if he was spamming or doing something against the rules. Being a troll isn't against the rules, is it? So he should be able to talk to zippo himself

Les I've lost track of the number of times I've been banned from wp lol, I dunno which of us would win that title :laugh:

I was pretty sure the callout had ended. Zippo was pissed off and stressed the day of the callout and then by the next day-ish he was over it.

Yeah i have been banned a heap of times and it gets harder each time to register under proxy. That said when there is something interesting a foot i usually try to get on anyhow and have another crack. I dunno. I forget how many times i have been banned too.  :green:
Title: Re: Émile Armand
Post by: odeon on February 05, 2012, 02:20:08 AM
Me and Zippo are having a discussion. I would like to continue my discussion without him hiding behind a moderator.

My discussion with him is none of your concern. I do not see why you are asking irrelevant questions. 

Let me and Zippo discuss the matters without interference. Is that okay?

No, it's not. You are a troll and therefore my problem.
This right here is pure gold. It is not okay to have a discussion with someone on this website. I am your problem? Are you serious? What did I read on the main page? I am having trouble understanding why the main page states what it states when none of it appears to be true.

You keep writing that you see me as a "troll" and how boring I am. It reminds me of Godwin's law, but instead of bringing up the nazis, you just call whoever a troll and write boring, when you or others cannot support their claims. It is admitting the obvious.

I don't think you understood what it say on the front page, tbh.  Can you what you think it's not true on that page?
Title: Re: Émile Armand
Post by: skyblue1 on February 05, 2012, 05:03:39 PM
Gun-Loving Democrat here, I am pretty sure this will be my next purchase

(http://i297.photobucket.com/albums/mm223/skyblue1110/513ULB3_1.jpg)
RAGING JUDGE ULTRA-LITE® REVOLVER - .410 GA. OR .45 COLT - 7-SHOT

i lurve that! seems awesome as fuck. would be dificult to get a decent shot off with that though. would be hard to use anywhere but a range.
no, it is a nice weapon, especially using the 410 shotshells.

I would own it already except for the $1000 price tag
Title: Re: Émile Armand
Post by: Émile Armand on February 05, 2012, 06:22:48 PM
Me and Zippo are having a discussion. I would like to continue my discussion without him hiding behind a moderator.

My discussion with him is none of your concern. I do not see why you are asking irrelevant questions. 

Let me and Zippo discuss the matters without interference. Is that okay?

No, it's not. You are a troll and therefore my problem.
This right here is pure gold. It is not okay to have a discussion with someone on this website. I am your problem? Are you serious? What did I read on the main page? I am having trouble understanding why the main page states what it states when none of it appears to be true.

You keep writing that you see me as a "troll" and how boring I am. It reminds me of Godwin's law, but instead of bringing up the nazis, you just call whoever a troll and write boring, when you or others cannot support their claims. It is admitting the obvious.

I don't think you understood what it say on the front page, tbh.  Can you what you think it's not true on that page?
By your sensitivity and others.
Title: Re: Émile Armand
Post by: odeon on February 05, 2012, 09:10:09 PM
Me and Zippo are having a discussion. I would like to continue my discussion without him hiding behind a moderator.

My discussion with him is none of your concern. I do not see why you are asking irrelevant questions. 

Let me and Zippo discuss the matters without interference. Is that okay?

No, it's not. You are a troll and therefore my problem.
This right here is pure gold. It is not okay to have a discussion with someone on this website. I am your problem? Are you serious? What did I read on the main page? I am having trouble understanding why the main page states what it states when none of it appears to be true.

You keep writing that you see me as a "troll" and how boring I am. It reminds me of Godwin's law, but instead of bringing up the nazis, you just call whoever a troll and write boring, when you or others cannot support their claims. It is admitting the obvious.

I don't think you understood what it say on the front page, tbh.  Can you what you think it's not true on that page?
By your sensitivity and others.

Again, tell me what is not true on that page.
Title: Re: Émile Armand
Post by: Émile Armand on February 05, 2012, 10:47:55 PM
Odeon, you are a man of principles and ideas, yet you lack the courtesy to show me love and acceptance because you are afraid that I am some buttperson. I am deeply honored you would show me your sensitive side.
Title: Re: Émile Armand
Post by: Zippo on February 06, 2012, 01:16:37 AM
Gun-Loving Democrat here, I am pretty sure this will be my next purchase

(http://i297.photobucket.com/albums/mm223/skyblue1110/513ULB3_1.jpg)
RAGING JUDGE ULTRA-LITE® REVOLVER - .410 GA. OR .45 COLT - 7-SHOT

i lurve that! seems awesome as fuck. would be dificult to get a decent shot off with that though. would be hard to use anywhere but a range.
no, it is a nice weapon, especially using the 410 shotshells.

I would own it already except for the $1000 price tag

i agree its a nice weapon. but using 410 shells is going to be a little interesting, i watched a video on the three inch barrel version on youtube showing firing and shot paterns and its acuracy at seven feet would restrict you from using it in public places. thats why i said it would be good to use at a range but not anyware else. that is unless you plan on using 410 slugs
Title: Re: Émile Armand
Post by: Al Swearegen on February 06, 2012, 03:14:33 AM
Me and Zippo are having a discussion. I would like to continue my discussion without him hiding behind a moderator.

My discussion with him is none of your concern. I do not see why you are asking irrelevant questions. 

Let me and Zippo discuss the matters without interference. Is that okay?

No, it's not. You are a troll and therefore my problem.
This right here is pure gold. It is not okay to have a discussion with someone on this website. I am your problem? Are you serious? What did I read on the main page? I am having trouble understanding why the main page states what it states when none of it appears to be true.

You keep writing that you see me as a "troll" and how boring I am. It reminds me of Godwin's law, but instead of bringing up the nazis, you just call whoever a troll and write boring, when you or others cannot support their claims. It is admitting the obvious.

So which bit is untrue. Rather than deflect can you state what you think is untrue and why?
If you can't why say it?
Title: Re: Émile Armand
Post by: odeon on February 06, 2012, 08:52:07 AM
Odeon, you are a man of principles and ideas, yet you lack the courtesy to show me love and acceptance because you are afraid that I am some buttperson. I am deeply honored you would show me your sensitive side.

Let's try it one more time: tell me what's not true on that page.
Title: Re: Émile Armand
Post by: Émile Armand on February 06, 2012, 09:05:10 AM
Quote
You have found INTENSITY², the autistic spectrum site everyone loves to hate.

 We stand for freedom of expression, combative debate, and the generation of ideas. There are no boundaries here over what may be said, save for one rule - be prepared to back up your words. Or face the wrath of the community.

I have read you have banned people for things that have been wrote. They pushed the boundaries and you banned. That sounds exactly like the claim above.  :facepalm2:

Did you not ban someone on this site for thinking he was someone else. Pig is his name. There are no boundaries? Sure. ;)
Quote
A word or two of warning from our critics:

'... a barely-legal, completely unethical, den of iniquity that exists mainly for the amusement of a socially-able aspergic elite' - Intensity² Recruitment Chairman

Yeah... Okay... ::)
Title: Re: Émile Armand
Post by: odeon on February 06, 2012, 09:08:38 AM
Links to what you have read, please.
Title: Re: Émile Armand
Post by: Émile Armand on February 06, 2012, 11:41:09 AM
http://www.intensitysquared.com/index.php/topic,19019.0.html (http://www.intensitysquared.com/index.php/topic,19019.0.html)

Further more, the main page states there are no boundaries, then it immediately contradicts that claim and states a boundary. You have to be 18 to join.
Title: Re: Émile Armand
Post by: odeon on February 06, 2012, 12:09:05 PM
http://www.intensitysquared.com/index.php/topic,19019.0.html (http://www.intensitysquared.com/index.php/topic,19019.0.html)

As you well know, Pig was thought to be BC and therefore banned, not because of anything he wrote. When we realised our mistake, he was unbanned. Try again.

Quote
Further more, the main page states there are no boundaries, then it immediately contradicts that claim and states a boundary. You have to be 18 to join.

Are you seriously going to argue semantics with me? Weak troll.
Title: Re: Émile Armand
Post by: Émile Armand on February 06, 2012, 03:18:53 PM
Cannot back up your argument and you use the troll response again. Is that all you have?
Title: Re: Émile Armand
Post by: Al Swearegen on February 07, 2012, 05:11:45 AM
Cannot back up your argument and you use the troll response again. Is that all you have?

Let's pretend that you right. Just to humour you. Does it matter and if so why?

I will tell you why i am prepared to humour you here. There is a really butthurt clown who some believe that is a troll who has the same Modus Operandi, of coming on here, posting for a while against the members and trying to stir shit up (and generally getting owned, all the while, and after having made enough posts, always is drawn to the fact that we have not changed the front page to reflect what he wants. He, like you, complains how it is wrong and misleading and ....well wrong and misleading.

Now it may or may not be but it doesn't really matter. It does for him though dammit. It is a travesty and needs to change and he gets up in arms about it.

It has drawn him back here again and again. The poor fool is without any purpose in life by the looks and exists solely for changing this one page on a forum he is not a member of, banned for and doesn't care for.

Not suggesting you share this idiotic passion BUT so what if it is not fitting in with your wants or expectations? Why should anyone give a shit, Emile?
Title: Re: Émile Armand
Post by: odeon on February 07, 2012, 04:28:59 PM
Cannot back up your argument and you use the troll response again. Is that all you have?

REALLY weak troll.
Title: Re: Émile Armand
Post by: Émile Armand on February 07, 2012, 04:39:04 PM
Another win for me.
Title: Re: Émile Armand
Post by: Zippo on February 07, 2012, 04:42:08 PM
Another win for me.

odeon won.
Title: Re: Émile Armand
Post by: odeon on February 07, 2012, 04:43:56 PM
Another win for me.

Really, really weak troll.
Title: Re: Émile Armand
Post by: Émile Armand on February 07, 2012, 04:46:00 PM
You are mad.
Title: Re: Émile Armand
Post by: odeon on February 07, 2012, 04:48:26 PM
You are mad.

And you are weak.
Title: Re: Émile Armand
Post by: Al Swearegen on February 07, 2012, 05:03:39 PM
Another win for me.

What did you win?
Title: Re: Émile Armand
Post by: Calavera on February 07, 2012, 05:05:07 PM
Probably attention. As he's probably being deprived of it in real life ...
Title: Re: Émile Armand
Post by: odeon on February 07, 2012, 05:15:46 PM
What a sad existence it is.
Title: Re: Émile Armand
Post by: Émile Armand on February 07, 2012, 06:54:25 PM
Another win for me.

odeon won.
You were the one that started this thread and you lost to me.
Title: Re: Émile Armand
Post by: Al Swearegen on February 08, 2012, 04:54:58 AM
Another win for me.

odeon won.
You were the one that started this thread and you lost to me.

You talk of winning. What did you win and how?
Title: Re: Émile Armand
Post by: Émile Armand on February 08, 2012, 08:31:45 PM
You are the know-nothing of today, the learned man of yesterday has been long gone.

Keep them in ignorance in order to preserve quiet, and gradually debase them that he may serve from a loftier throne.


Title: Re: Émile Armand
Post by: Zippo on February 08, 2012, 08:59:21 PM
Another win for me.

odeon won.
You were the one that started this thread and you lost to me.

i ended the discussion. i won. fail troll is fail
Title: Re: Émile Armand
Post by: Émile Armand on February 08, 2012, 09:06:41 PM
Yes, after you lost and had a hissy fit, kind of like right now.
Title: Re: Émile Armand
Post by: Zippo on February 09, 2012, 04:32:58 PM
Yes, after you lost and had a hissy fit, kind of like right now.

did i mention fail troll is fail?
Title: Re: Émile Armand
Post by: midlifeaspie on February 09, 2012, 05:23:47 PM
 :yawn:
Title: Re: Émile Armand
Post by: Parts on February 09, 2012, 05:27:21 PM
:yawn:

:poke:    WAKE UP
Title: Re: Émile Armand
Post by: midlifeaspie on February 09, 2012, 05:42:49 PM
:yawn:

:poke:    WAKE UP

I wish I could.  Every time I log in here it's like I am trapped in another long, bad dream where this place has become a complete parody of itself.
Title: Re: Émile Armand
Post by: Parts on February 09, 2012, 05:46:27 PM
:yawn:

:poke:    WAKE UP

I wish I could.  Every time I log in here it's like I am trapped in another long, bad dream where this place has become a complete parody of itself.

I know believe me I know ::)  Every time it starts to turn around it starts again :zombiefuck:
Well here some nice boobs to bring back memories of less confrontational times
(http://www.babe-lounge.com/content/cassia-riley-nicetits/cassia-riley-nice-tits-010.jpg)
Title: Re: Émile Armand
Post by: midlifeaspie on February 09, 2012, 05:48:47 PM
Even the boobs don't work right anymore :(
Title: Re: Émile Armand
Post by: Parts on February 09, 2012, 05:53:13 PM
Even the boobs don't work right anymore :(

This is more serious than I thought how about this
(http://www.truthordarepics.com/sexstoryarchive/girlskissing/images/girlskissing22.jpg)
Title: Re: Émile Armand
Post by: midlifeaspie on February 09, 2012, 05:54:45 PM
There is nothing left now (emo)
Title: Re: Émile Armand
Post by: Parts on February 09, 2012, 05:55:55 PM
There is nothing left now (emo)

You need medical attention before it gets any worse  :nerdy:
Title: Re: Émile Armand
Post by: RageBeoulve on February 29, 2012, 09:38:11 PM
I loled odeon. Nice work man.  :zoinks:
Title: Re: Émile Armand
Post by: Genesis on March 01, 2012, 11:30:24 PM
Sheesh....