INTENSITY²
Arena for the Competitive => Main Event Callouts => Topic started by: RageBeoulve on October 26, 2013, 07:09:14 PM
-
Sup? So I called you out because you said this:
Problem is you're too impulsive to sit back and consider if you really do have a valid point to make.
I can play along with you if that's what you want, but you'd do well to compensate for some of the retarded stuff you've been coming up with lately.
That's one of the dumbest things someone has said to me in a while, and i'll tell you why. Because you don't commit to a point yourself. All you're doing is following me around, contributing negativity. You haven't really contributed anything to discussion other than namecalling, or telling others that their political views are stupid.
Very similar to a religious person, btw. By the time i'm done with you i'll force you to stop closing your mind to that too. I'm pretty sure you aren't stupid, so I know that after my last post you understand what i'd been trying to say. You're just being stubborn. Well i'm a lot more stubborn than you. ;) Lets look at the reason I called you out again.
Problem is you're too impulsive to sit back and consider if you really do have a valid point to make.
That's a hell of a claim, considering some of the post I took that from included you saying you didn't understand what I was trying to say. I challenge you to back it up. Now. :zoinks:
Next:
I can play along with you if that's what you want
You're not playing ball yet actually, you're being a cunt. You will though. I have all the time in the world to work on you. :laugh:
but you'd do well to compensate for some of the retarded stuff you've been coming up with lately
Now see if you were to say.. name some things? Maybe rattle off some specifics as to WHY they're retarded, you would find me far more pleasant to converse with. As things are, you closemindedly wander into things without a full understanding and rattle off insults and dismissals. Sounds awfully Christian. :lol1:
-
Concerning your impulsiveness and lack of critical thinking skills, here's one example (among many) for now:
http://www.intensitysquared.com/index.php/topic,21514.0.html (http://www.intensitysquared.com/index.php/topic,21514.0.html)
The title you assigned to thread:
Federal reserve exposed
Here's what you posted in the OP:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=nE3BmhhWFFQ#ws (http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=nE3BmhhWFFQ#ws)
What is wrong with what you were arguing, you say?
Well, I already explained in my response there:
The video isn't that recent. The same video was uploaded on eBaum's World the year 2009:
http://www.ebaumsworld.com/video/watch/80703467# (http://www.ebaumsworld.com/video/watch/80703467#)
Also, it looks like we already have the answer to the question, so this is really old news now:
http://money.cnn.com/2010/12/01/news/economy/fed_reserve_data_release/index.htm (http://money.cnn.com/2010/12/01/news/economy/fed_reserve_data_release/index.htm)
To which your response was:
No wonder why I couldn't find anything about this on opposing viewpoints.
lol
-
Sounds awfully Christian.
So what are you trying to say here? That I'm a Christian? :LOL:
-
Nice job proving my point. You take a single thing I've said out of a truly vast amount, and because I was mistaken about something everything else I have ever or will ever say is automatically "retarded".This is a lot like the argument we just had, where you RELIGIOUSLY cling to a small fragment of a definition, closemindedly refusing to accept any other viewpont as valid or constructive. Lets look at the exchange you posted here.
Concerning your impulsiveness and lack of critical thinking skills, here's one example (among many) for now:
http://www.intensitysquared.com/index.php/topic,21514.0.html (http://www.intensitysquared.com/index.php/topic,21514.0.html)
The title you assigned to thread:
Federal reserve exposed
Here's what you posted in the OP:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=nE3BmhhWFFQ#ws (http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=nE3BmhhWFFQ#ws)
What is wrong with what you were arguing, you say?
Well, I already explained in my response there:
The video isn't that recent. The same video was uploaded on eBaum's World the year 2009:
http://www.ebaumsworld.com/video/watch/80703467# (http://www.ebaumsworld.com/video/watch/80703467#)
Also, it looks like we already have the answer to the question, so this is really old news now:
http://money.cnn.com/2010/12/01/news/economy/fed_reserve_data_release/index.htm (http://money.cnn.com/2010/12/01/news/economy/fed_reserve_data_release/index.htm)
To which your response was:
No wonder why I couldn't find anything about this on opposing viewpoints.
lol
Ok, so a guy stumbles across something on youtube, looks shocking. Looks remotely believable. The guy thinks "Oh wow, this will make for a fantastic discussion on intensity! Imma post it." Someone posts some proof that its a hoax. What does the guy do? Does he puff out his chest and yell at you? Nope. Does he refuse to believe you? Nah. He immediately accepts this new information, as there is no reason not to, and comments about it being no wonder why he couldn't find anything about it on one of his favorite sources. So he doesn't get all pissy or anything, he just looks for something else, like an adult.
Just to be clear, the guy I was talking about is me. Mind telling me what was wrong with my behavior in the ground breaking example you just posted? Because I see nothing, which is more than I can say for your behavior.
-
Sounds awfully Christian.
So what are you trying to say here? That I'm a Christian? :LOL:
No, what I said was:
Sounds awfully Christian
And it does. Close-minded, backwards, judgmental, and immature. You'd make a fantastic addition to any Christian community.
-
Was that all you had? :hahaha:
-
Yeah, it's exam period and can't be f*cked with callouts.
-
Yeah, it's exam period and can't be f*cked with callouts.
Hmph. ::)