INTENSITY²

Start here => M.O.-Introductions => Topic started by: Scrapheap on March 12, 2010, 12:24:54 PM

Title: Aspergianstar2009
Post by: Scrapheap on March 12, 2010, 12:24:54 PM
Does anyone know who the fuck the youtuber Aspergianstar2009 (http://www.youtube.com/user/Aspergianstar2009) is??

He subscribed to me even though I haven't been active there in months. He obviously knows who I am.
Title: Re: Aspergianstar2009
Post by: TheoK on March 12, 2010, 12:37:54 PM
He subscribed to me too. I denied being a "friend" of him, though. I have no idea who he is. :eyebrow:
Title: Re: Aspergianstar2009
Post by: Callaway on March 12, 2010, 01:36:44 PM
From reading the link, he is male, was diagnosed when he was 34, and lives in Birmingham, UK.

Here he is on YouTube, in case someone recognizes him:

http://www.youtube.com/user/Aspergianstar2009#p/c/509F70D6AEAA739D/1/VRuCT_zm4K0
Title: Re: Aspergianstar2009
Post by: Christopher McCandless on March 12, 2010, 01:39:25 PM
Sounds like an absolute Brummie. Shouldn't be too difficult to track down if he posts on these sorts of sites. Maybe he just does a search for Aspergers then adds people or something...
Title: Re: Aspergianstar2009
Post by: Parts on March 12, 2010, 01:40:05 PM
A friend whore that's who ::)

Quote
Friends (39829)
Title: Re: Aspergianstar2009
Post by: Natalia Evans on March 12, 2010, 02:31:25 PM
Oh I know him. It's Steve and he is chemer. Ugh. He is a pedophile. He once added me as a friend and I denied him.
Title: Re: Aspergianstar2009
Post by: Parts on March 12, 2010, 02:42:02 PM
Oh I know him. It's Steve and he is chemer. Ugh. He is a pedophile. He once added me as a friend and I denied him.
 

You seem to know everyone
Title: Re: Aspergianstar2009
Post by: Callaway on March 12, 2010, 03:04:45 PM
Oh I know him. It's Steve and he is chemer. Ugh. He is a pedophile. He once added me as a friend and I denied him.

You mean he goes after prepubescent or underage girls or boys?
Title: Re: Aspergianstar2009
Post by: Natalia Evans on March 12, 2010, 04:43:56 PM
Yes. Peeing on them, touching them, making them take off their clothes to see them naked. Spells out pedophile to me.
Title: Re: Aspergianstar2009
Post by: Parts on March 12, 2010, 06:00:36 PM
Yes. Peeing on them, touching them, making them take off their clothes to see them naked. Spells out pedophile to me.

What does he talk about it?  We should appoint you the official investigator of I2 :lol:
Title: Re: Aspergianstar2009
Post by: Natalia Evans on March 12, 2010, 06:27:50 PM
He did in MSN and I blocked him.
Title: Re: Aspergianstar2009
Post by: "couldbecousin" on March 13, 2010, 07:28:22 AM
Yes. Peeing on them, touching them, making them take off their clothes to see them naked. Spells out pedophile to me.

Does he actually do this, or is it just talk?

Is there any way he can be located, and reported to the police?  :grrr:
Title: Re: Aspergianstar2009
Post by: 'andersom' on March 13, 2010, 04:04:12 PM
Yes. Peeing on them, touching them, making them take off their clothes to see them naked. Spells out pedophile to me.

Does he actually do this, or is it just talk?

Is there any way he can be located, and reported to the police?  :grrr:

That's what I thought too.
Title: Re: Aspergianstar2009
Post by: "couldbecousin" on March 13, 2010, 04:19:44 PM
Yes. Peeing on them, touching them, making them take off their clothes to see them naked. Spells out pedophile to me.

Does he actually do this, or is it just talk?

Is there any way he can be located, and reported to the police?  :grrr:

I'm guessing there would need to be logs of messages detailing said activities... ???
That's what I thought too.
Title: Re: Aspergianstar2009
Post by: Natalia Evans on March 13, 2010, 05:12:25 PM
This is embarrassing for me because I am not the type of person who can report to authorities because I don't know how and stupid shyness to talk to the police. That's why I wouldn't be a good mod. Blocking them is just the easy way out. Maybe reporting him to MSN would have done good and they maybe would have taken it to the UK. I was an idiot then. He was in the UK and I was in the USA. I personally think he told me this stuff because he knew I'd be the perfect target for it and knew I didn't have the ability to report him. He told me I was the only person he talks to about.

Yes he did do it because he always talked about it.

I have thought about in the past unblocking him and hope he talk to me again and start talking about this stuff again but I can't face it.
Title: Re: Aspergianstar2009
Post by: Scrapheap on March 13, 2010, 05:33:59 PM
This is embarrassing for me because I am not the type of person who can report to authorities because I don't know how and stupid shyness to talk to the police. That's why I wouldn't be a good mod. Blocking them is just the easy way out. Maybe reporting him to MSN would have done good and they maybe would have taken it to the UK. I was an idiot then. He was in the UK and I was in the USA. I personally think he told me this stuff because he knew I'd be the perfect target for it and knew I didn't have the ability to report him. He told me I was the only person he talks to about.

Yes he did do it because he always talked about it.

I have thought about in the past unblocking him and hope he talk to me again and start talking about this stuff again but I can't face it.

If you don't then hopefully someone else does. Ther'es only one place for peados, 6 feet under!! :evillaugh:
Title: Re: Aspergianstar2009
Post by: 'andersom' on March 13, 2010, 05:57:28 PM
This is embarrassing for me because I am not the type of person who can report to authorities because I don't know how and stupid shyness to talk to the police. That's why I wouldn't be a good mod. Blocking them is just the easy way out. Maybe reporting him to MSN would have done good and they maybe would have taken it to the UK. I was an idiot then. He was in the UK and I was in the USA. I personally think he told me this stuff because he knew I'd be the perfect target for it and knew I didn't have the ability to report him. He told me I was the only person he talks to about.

Yes he did do it because he always talked about it.

I have thought about in the past unblocking him and hope he talk to me again and start talking about this stuff again but I can't face it.

If you have the conversations stored on your computer, you could still report him. But it would be a hard thing to do for you, I am aware of that. Don't know if there is the dual option where you live that is possible here towards authorities. Here you can make a formal complaint, and also an informal mentioning it. The latter is not invasive for the person who does it, but puts a kind of warning tag on the tab of the person you mention. So, if someone else comes with a complaint, the complaint will have a backing up because of the mentioning it.

Don't unblock him on MSN Kit, You don't have to face stuff like that. You do have to think about you too.
Title: Re: Aspergianstar2009
Post by: 'andersom' on March 13, 2010, 05:58:54 PM
Unblocking could even turn out bad for you I guess, because then it could be seen as if you were looking for the stuff he talks about.
Don't unblock him!!!
Title: Re: Aspergianstar2009
Post by: TheoK on March 26, 2010, 04:19:58 PM
He's not BRAVE! :toporly:
Title: Re: Aspergianstar2009
Post by: The_Chosen_One on September 17, 2010, 01:29:26 AM
As hyke said, if SG still has the logs of his MSN shite, then they can be used. Send them to your local police, with copies to the FBI and Scotland Yard. You won't have to face him, but if they want to act, they will take it from there. What he is doing is illegal because paedophilia and child porn are illegal acts made that way by authorities all over the world.

Maybe nothing will be done either, but it's worth a try.
Title: Re: Aspergianstar2009
Post by: Squidusa on September 22, 2010, 05:18:16 AM
This thread made me gag :sick:


As hyke said, if SG still has the logs of his MSN shite, then they can be used. Send them to your local police, with copies to the FBI and Scotland Yard. You won't have to face him, but if they want to act, they will take it from there. What he is doing is illegal because paedophilia and child porn are illegal acts made that way by authorities all over the world.

Maybe nothing will be done either, but it's worth a try.

 :agreed:
Title: Re: Aspergianstar2009
Post by: DirtDawg on September 22, 2010, 05:35:04 AM
Oh I know him. It's Steve and he is chemer. Ugh. He is a pedophile. He once added me as a friend and I denied him.

You mean he goes after prepubescent or underage girls or boys?



NEXT RESPONSE:



Yes. Peeing on them, touching them, making them take off their clothes to see them naked. Spells out pedophile to me.










I get that this is a tired old thread and that I never read all the shit that is posted these days - hardly worth reading for the most part - but my concern is:  Why did Callawy NOT respond to this?

Yes, we have busy lives, Callaway, and yours is quite busy, but are you losing interest or are you off your game a bit?

Not really trying to challenge you, but I feel that this might have been subject to the full force of your capabilities upon sight.

I have to ask you Callaway,   "Is everything OK with you?  Are losing your will to fight?"
Title: Re: Aspergianstar2009
Post by: DirtDawg on September 22, 2010, 05:39:04 AM
This thread made me gag :sick:


As hyke said, if SG still has the logs of his MSN shite, then they can be used. Send them to your local police, with copies to the FBI and Scotland Yard. You won't have to face him, but if they want to act, they will take it from there. What he is doing is illegal because paedophilia and child porn are illegal acts made that way by authorities all over the world.

Maybe nothing will be done either, but it's worth a try.

 :agreed:


Maybe some time spent in recreational gagging would be good for you.
Title: Re: Aspergianstar2009
Post by: General Razorbeard on September 30, 2010, 09:29:46 AM
I'm young, and the cowardly Briton tried to add me as a friend.
Title: Re: Aspergianstar2009
Post by: Natalia Evans on October 15, 2010, 11:44:19 PM
Pee guy thinks what I said about him was a rumor but why would I lie about someone?

:shrugs:

I am not surprised aspergian2009 will deny what he used to do to me on MSN.


http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=HYF5XywNVBQ
Title: Re: Aspergianstar2009
Post by: The_Chosen_One on October 16, 2010, 01:59:47 AM
Fucking pea, he's priceless, ain't he.

Boxer shorts.... K-mart.... 400 Oak Street....
Title: Re: Aspergianstar2009
Post by: Bastet on October 21, 2013, 02:43:54 PM
Pee guy thinks what I said about him was a rumor but why would I lie about someone?

:shrugs:

I am not surprised aspergian2009 will deny what he used to do to me on MSN.


http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=HYF5XywNVBQ (http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=HYF5XywNVBQ)

I remember this guy. He was jealous of Bikiniartist for having more subs. He's a doofus that thinks. He can dictate how a woman dresses. Bikini artist deleted he autism videos and kept the regular ones. He struck me as a misogynistic  asshole.
Title: Re: Aspergianstar2009
Post by: Gopher Gary on May 08, 2014, 12:45:23 PM
UPDATE:

Natalia Evans was right about Aspergianstar2009 (Stephen Gandy), he is a paedophile and has been caught and convicted. It's hard to say if acting back in 2010 would've made a difference, but it's a lesson to be learned nonetheless.

 http://www.birminghammail.co.uk/news/local-news/cradley-heath-husband-wife-husband-5770280 (http://www.birminghammail.co.uk/news/local-news/cradley-heath-husband-wife-husband-5770280)
Title: Re: Aspergianstar2009
Post by: Jack on May 08, 2014, 04:55:57 PM
And the female gets community service.  :-\
Title: Re: Aspergianstar2009
Post by: Gopher Gary on May 08, 2014, 05:00:31 PM
And the female gets community service.  :-\

In British Jurisprudence, they also have the "Pussy Pass".
Title: Re: Aspergianstar2009
Post by: Walker on May 11, 2014, 11:08:08 AM
And the female gets community service.  :-\

To be fair, the female in question wasn't all there and from what I understand; Gandy took advantage of this and manipulated her into doing it.
Title: Re: Aspergianstar2009
Post by: Jack on May 11, 2014, 11:31:21 AM
And the female gets community service.  :-\

To be fair, the female in question wasn't all there and from what I understand; Gandy took advantage of this and manipulated her into doing it.
She was mentally and emotionally inferior to him? How unsurprising that's the reason. Do you have a source for the claim that the female pedophile was mentally weak and manipulated by the male pedophile who was mentally all there?
Title: Re: Aspergianstar2009
Post by: Walker on May 11, 2014, 11:45:28 AM
And the female gets community service.  :-\

To be fair, the female in question wasn't all there and from what I understand; Gandy took advantage of this and manipulated her into doing it.
She was mentally and emotionally inferior to him? How unsurprising that's the reason. Do you have a source for the claim that the female pedophile was mentally weak and manipulated by the male pedophile who was mentally all there?

Other than the fact that I used to watch his videos and she appeared several times, I do have a video from a close friend of his.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=uLlf7tRgd4U&feature=player_detailpage#t=657 (https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=uLlf7tRgd4U&feature=player_detailpage#t=657)
They were kind of rivals, on and off friends, trolling eachother and arguing and creating a lot of drama over the course of four or five years.

If you saw Annette in the videos, you could often see that she was like a sort of puppet, who sat by his side and regurgitated his stupidity and dramatic bullshit but those videos were deleted, along with his account, a few months before he was arrested (due to drama).
Title: Re: Aspergianstar2009
Post by: Jack on May 11, 2014, 11:48:20 AM
This is the only thing I could find which alludes to that.
http://www.expressandstar.com/news/crime/2013/08/22/husband-jailed-over-child-porn-offences/ (http://www.expressandstar.com/news/crime/2013/08/22/husband-jailed-over-child-porn-offences/)
Quote
Mr Andrew Baker, defending, said Storey was easily led and did not present a risk on her own...
Judge Martin Walsh said Storey’s offence was ‘deeply troubling’, while Gandy posed a ‘significant risk to members of the public.
This is the way society views female sexual offenders in general, deeply troubling, but not a significant risk. Women are somehow innately good and don't do this sort of thing, when they do it's because they're a weak gender easily led by the bad men, deeply troubling.
Title: Re: Aspergianstar2009
Post by: Jack on May 11, 2014, 11:51:58 AM
If you saw Annette in the videos, you could often see that she was like a sort of puppet,
I see no claims anywhere that she was mentally disabled and unable to realize the impact of what she was doing. If she were severely mentally retarded it could be a valid argument, being a vapid woman is no defence.
Title: Re: Aspergianstar2009
Post by: Walker on May 11, 2014, 12:05:05 PM
This is the only thing I could find which alludes to that.
http://www.expressandstar.com/news/crime/2013/08/22/husband-jailed-over-child-porn-offences/ (http://www.expressandstar.com/news/crime/2013/08/22/husband-jailed-over-child-porn-offences/)
Quote
Mr Andrew Baker, defending, said Storey was easily led and did not present a risk on her own...
Judge Martin Walsh said Storey’s offence was ‘deeply troubling’, while Gandy posed a ‘significant risk to members of the public.
This is the way society views female sexual offenders in general, deeply troubling, but not a significant risk. Women are somehow innately good and don't do this sort of thing, when they do it's because they're a weak gender easily led by the bad men, deeply troubling.

I would never say that she was 'mentally retarded' but she was easily mislead. The guy says in the video (who knew here in real life).

Quote
I feel sorry for her, even though she was in on the abuse. I do think that there was something wrong with her, I think that's the reason why her children were put into care...

I do see where you're coming from but in this case I do agree with the verdict (knowing what I did/do about Aspergianstar2009), not because of her gender but because she genuinely didn't seem to be all there.

If it was the other way around, I'd still say the same thing.

Of course, this is just from my perspective and maybe the fact that she was in on the abuse should come above all else.  :dunno:

I can see why it would seem that this verdict was based on her gender and for all I know, it possibly could have been but I probably would have come to similar verdict myself.
Title: Re: Aspergianstar2009
Post by: Jack on May 11, 2014, 12:16:37 PM
maybe the fact that she was in on the abuse should come above all else.  :dunno:
Yes it should. Am sick of seeing women given leniency for violent crimes due to claiming emotional weakness of some sort.

I probably would have come to similar verdict myself.
That's a common thing because people want to believe she's not a pedophile, when she is.
Title: Re: Aspergianstar2009
Post by: Bastet on May 11, 2014, 12:18:09 PM
I'm sad.
Title: Re: Aspergianstar2009
Post by: Jack on May 11, 2014, 12:33:18 PM
Jack didn't intend to make you feel sad. :(
Title: Re: Aspergianstar2009
Post by: Walker on May 11, 2014, 12:36:04 PM
I probably would have come to similar verdict myself.
That's a common thing because people want to believe she's not a pedophile, when she is.

Perhaps you're right, not in the sense that I don't want to believe it, because I couldn't really give a fuck and she was in on it but more-so in the sense that I keep saying 'she wouldn't have done this on her own' and she's not really a threat as an individual but then again, would anyone do this on their own?

If it isn't some psychotic asshole coaxing you into doing it, then it'll be something else and I don't truly know if the woman can differentiate between right and wrong.

I should probably think on this some more.
Title: Re: Aspergianstar2009
Post by: Jack on May 11, 2014, 01:03:52 PM
would anyone do this on their own?
It's hard to imagine anyone being simply misled into being an accomplice to something so vile. It's harder to understand them being excused as a threat, because they didn't act as an individual. Thinking a male wouldn't get compassion for such a defense.
Title: Re: Aspergianstar2009
Post by: odeon on May 11, 2014, 10:39:57 PM
Did anyone notice that there was a Superintendent Tim Bacon handling the case?
Title: Re: Aspergianstar2009
Post by: sg1008 on May 12, 2014, 12:50:36 PM
I doesn't matter how misled a person is.......if she hurt someone, she ought to be treated as such. How else will she realise she needs to take responsibility for her actions? Woman side-kicks are just as nasty as the dude...maybe even nastier because women tend to be the ones to lure the kids in. :/

Title: Re: Aspergianstar2009
Post by: Jack on May 12, 2014, 03:54:33 PM
Did anyone notice that there was a Superintendent Tim Bacon handling the case?
Is this about the bacon movie thread? It said the case happened during a local awareness campaign.  Mr. Bacon, head of that particular campaign, gave a comment about the campaign. Didn't notice it said he had any direct involvement in the handling though. Don't know anything about Mr. Bacon; if he were involved, is that something to notice?
Title: Re: Aspergianstar2009
Post by: odeon on May 12, 2014, 10:28:15 PM
Did anyone notice that there was a Superintendent Tim Bacon handling the case?
Is this about the bacon movie thread? It said the case happened during a local awareness campaign.  Mr. Bacon, head of that particular campaign, gave a comment about the campaign. Didn't notice it said he had any direct involvement in the handling though. Don't know anything about Mr. Bacon; if he were involved, is that something to notice?

I thought it was amusing, that's all.
Title: Re: Aspergianstar2009
Post by: Jack on May 12, 2014, 11:01:17 PM
Did anyone notice that there was a Superintendent Tim Bacon handling the case?
Is this about the bacon movie thread? It said the case happened during a local awareness campaign.  Mr. Bacon, head of that particular campaign, gave a comment about the campaign. Didn't notice it said he had any direct involvement in the handling though. Don't know anything about Mr. Bacon; if he were involved, is that something to notice?

I thought it was amusing, that's all.
Was it the bacon that was amusing, or something about this guy I don't know? :laugh:
Title: Re: Aspergianstar2009
Post by: odeon on May 12, 2014, 11:53:47 PM
Did anyone notice that there was a Superintendent Tim Bacon handling the case?
Is this about the bacon movie thread? It said the case happened during a local awareness campaign.  Mr. Bacon, head of that particular campaign, gave a comment about the campaign. Didn't notice it said he had any direct involvement in the handling though. Don't know anything about Mr. Bacon; if he were involved, is that something to notice?

I thought it was amusing, that's all.
Was it the bacon that was amusing, or something about this guy I don't know? :laugh:

The bacon. I'm a simple guy. :P
Title: Re: Aspergianstar2009
Post by: DirtDawg on May 13, 2014, 12:05:11 AM
Did anyone notice that there was a Superintendent Tim Bacon handling the case?
Is this about the bacon movie thread? It said the case happened during a local awareness campaign.  Mr. Bacon, head of that particular campaign, gave a comment about the campaign. Didn't notice it said he had any direct involvement in the handling though. Don't know anything about Mr. Bacon; if he were involved, is that something to notice?

I thought it was amusing, that's all.
Was it the bacon that was amusing, or something about this guy I don't know? :laugh:

The bacon. I'm a simple guy. :P

As simple as bacon, right?

 :autism:
Title: Re: Aspergianstar2009
Post by: odeon on May 13, 2014, 06:54:18 AM
That's me.

And now I'm hungry.
Title: Re: Aspergianstar2009
Post by: Jack on May 13, 2014, 07:34:31 PM
Did anyone notice that there was a Superintendent Tim Bacon handling the case?
Is this about the bacon movie thread? It said the case happened during a local awareness campaign.  Mr. Bacon, head of that particular campaign, gave a comment about the campaign. Didn't notice it said he had any direct involvement in the handling though. Don't know anything about Mr. Bacon; if he were involved, is that something to notice?

I thought it was amusing, that's all.
Was it the bacon that was amusing, or something about this guy I don't know? :laugh:

The bacon. I'm a simple guy. :P
Fair enough. :laugh:
Title: Re: Aspergianstar2009
Post by: sg1008 on May 13, 2014, 08:27:57 PM
Thinking about this. If you know someone is a perve this is what you do:

1) If they are local, report them to the local police
2) if they are not local, or international, then the police won't do anything, they will just refer you to the federal investigative powers. In the USA you can make an anonymous report online to the FBI.
3) You could always reach out to Anonymous hackers...they seem to be able to bring pervs to their knees quite effectively.
4) If you are too afraid to do anything just think about how many children you could save from horror and just find a bloody way to report it, even if you need to ask someone else to do it for you.
Title: Re: Aspergianstar2009
Post by: odeon on May 13, 2014, 10:58:43 PM
Surely you mean a paedo? If you go after pervs, you need to after pretty much everybody. :P
Title: Re: Aspergianstar2009
Post by: Semicolon on May 14, 2014, 06:59:29 AM
Thinking about this. If you know someone is a perve this is what you do:

1) If they are local, report them to the local police
2) if they are not local, or international, then the police won't do anything, they will just refer you to the federal investigative powers. In the USA you can make an anonymous report online to the FBI.
3) You could always reach out to Anonymous hackers...they seem to be able to bring pervs to their knees quite effectively.
4) If you are too afraid to do anything just think about how many children you could save from horror and just find a bloody way to report it, even if you need to ask someone else to do it for you.

Anonymous is not a police organization.
Title: Re: Aspergianstar2009
Post by: sg1008 on May 14, 2014, 07:08:13 AM
Thinking about this. If you know someone is a perve this is what you do:

1) If they are local, report them to the local police
2) if they are not local, or international, then the police won't do anything, they will just refer you to the federal investigative powers. In the USA you can make an anonymous report online to the FBI.
3) You could always reach out to Anonymous hackers...they seem to be able to bring pervs to their knees quite effectively.
4) If you are too afraid to do anything just think about how many children you could save from horror and just find a bloody way to report it, even if you need to ask someone else to do it for you.

Anonymous is not a police organization.

Obviously ...its only a suggestion if u have trouble getting cops to investigate.
Title: Re: Aspergianstar2009
Post by: sg1008 on May 14, 2014, 07:11:03 AM
Surely you mean a paedo? If you go after pervs, you need to after pretty much everybody. :P

Yeah paedophiles....or any brand of perv u know is raping or molesting ppl.
Title: Re: Aspergianstar2009
Post by: odeon on May 14, 2014, 11:15:44 PM
Thank goodness. For a while I thought you were going after us normal pervs. :P
Title: Re: Aspergianstar2009
Post by: sg1008 on May 15, 2014, 07:13:28 AM
I would be making reports daily...
Title: Re: Aspergianstar2009
Post by: odeon on May 15, 2014, 10:42:33 PM
More often than that, I should think.
Title: Re: Aspergianstar2009
Post by: Pyraxis on June 06, 2014, 05:51:48 PM
What have Anonymous done to them?
Title: Re: Aspergianstar2009
Post by: sg1008 on July 19, 2014, 06:59:03 PM
What have Anonymous done to them?

I've seen Anon vow to take peados down a couple of different times.