My ask away thread

[purposefulinsanity]

i'm not telling.

That's funny, that was just the answer I was going to give to peaguy's last question 

Will you at least say what kind of gay porn?

[McGiver]

sure.

in the link i provided there was a picture of three guys holding their cocks.
it sent me to a ghey porn link.

it was dick sucking action.

[purposefulinsanity]

sure.

in the link i provided there was a picture of three guys holding their cocks.
it sent me to a ghey porn link.

it was dick sucking action.

* purposefulinsanity thinks I will have to check out that link later 

[McGiver]

sure.

in the link i provided there was a picture of three guys holding their cocks.
it sent me to a ghey porn link.

it was dick sucking action.

* purposefulinsanity thinks I will have to check out that link later 

would you like a reminder?

[purposefulinsanity]

Yes please- you can send me a pm reminder when I log off if you don't mind 

[RobertN]

When are you ever going to get around to do your "Intensity fuck-fantasy of the week -- the webcam version" topic?

I'm dying to know.

Since I hate webcams the answer is probably never, the rest sounds fun though

I can picture you fucking your two holes at the thought of Robert's 5" dick pressing into you.

Thats a 4" dick actually, Peegai

How do you fancy my 4" cock, PI?

[thepeaguy]

I take it that you two have become new-found friends by 2 in the morning.

[purposefulinsanity]

I take it that you two have become new-found friends by 2 in the morning.

Not at all, I'm just trying to be adult about the whole situation because it isn't helping the site at all for people to keep going round in circles with the same old arguments. I have chosen to speak to robertn with politeness because I can see that the name calling has gotten people no-where and I would like for everyone to be able to move on.

[thepeaguy]

I take it that you two have become new-found friends by 2 in the morning.

Not at all, I'm just trying to be adult about the whole situation because it isn't helping the site at all for people to keep going round in circles with the same old arguments. I have chosen to speak to robertn with politeness because I can see that the name calling has gotten people no-where and I would like for everyone to be able to move on.

It's alright. I'm just trying to make light of the situation with my humour.

[purposefulinsanity]

Ok, I thought that perhaps you were wondering why I was trying to sort things out.

[thepeaguy]

Ok, I thought that perhaps you were wondering why I was trying to sort things out.

I can't be arsed with Robert and the others anymore because they want to change Intensity to their standards, regardless.

I think that it's good that you're willing to sort things out with them, though.

[purposefulinsanity]

I'm not willing to change Intensity to fit other people's standards either, unless the membership as a whole wants change Intensity should stay a free speech site imo. But I am willing to try bring an end to this circular argument, that's all.

[RobertN]

Ok, I thought that perhaps you were wondering why I was trying to sort things out.

I can't be arsed with Robert and the others anymore because they want to change Intensity to their standards, regardless.

I think that it's good that you're willing to sort things out with them, though.

Peegai, it is my right to criticise Intensity, and I will carry on doing so (but not slagging people off as I may have been doing). However, I acknowledge that it is not my right to demand that Intensity changes its ways. I understand that I must respect the democratic process on here, and if the current membership like it as it is, then it will stay as it is. However, I do have the right to be skeptical and criticise and suggest (not demand) alternate directions for Intensity because I do not like it how it is. I also have the right to "whinge" about any injustices I feel I may have received from various people on here.

I hope you understand my point of view, PI. As this is a free speech site, I do think I should be allowed to speak my "rubbish" on here without fear of intimidation just because my view is different from the majority of values on here. Free Speech may be good, but tolerance and free speech is even better. That is the direction I feel that Intensity should go in, and I will vote for candidates at future elections who also want Intensity to go in that direction. But for now, I will have to accept hard cheese.

[thepeaguy]

Ok, I thought that perhaps you were wondering why I was trying to sort things out.

I can't be arsed with Robert and the others anymore because they want to change Intensity to their standards, regardless.

I think that it's good that you're willing to sort things out with them, though.

Peegai, it is my right to criticise Intensity, and I will carry on doing so (but not slagging people off as I may have been doing). However, I acknowledge that it is not my right to demand that Intensity changes its ways. I understand that I must respect the democratic process on here, and if the current membership like it as it is, then it will stay as it is. However, I do have the right to be skeptical and criticise and suggest (not demand) alternate directions for Intensity because I do not like it how it is. I also have the right to "whinge" about any injustices I feel I may have received from various people on here.

I hope you understand my point of view, PI. As this is a free speech site, I do think I should be allowed to speak my "rubbish" on here without fear of intimidation just because my view is different from the majority of values on here. Free Speech may be good, but tolerance and free speech is even better. That is the direction I feel that Intensity should go in, and I will vote for candidates at future elections who also want Intensity to go in that direction. But for now, I will have to accept hard cheese.

Where did I say that you don't have the right to express your criticism? I just said that I can't be arsed to take it seriously anymore, that's all.

[McGiver]

I do think I should be allowed to speak my "rubbish" on here without fear of intimidation just because my view is different from the majority of values on here. Free Speech may be good, but tolerance and free speech is even better.

you must realize that these are two way streets.
some people may feel intimidated by some of the things that you say and my reply with "rubbish" of their own.
i myself have been ganged up on several times, i have been intimidated.  i wonder if this happened because i was wrong.  i dunno, but i still fight for my rights to react any way i choose.
if i am wrong, then i apologise.  and when i do, i certainly do not revisit the issue again the next time i feel intimidated.

men are raped every day thread is one example.

another example is a thread started by peaguy in the sex forum, i just cannot remember its title.

the whole coup incident, and several others.  but these are to name but a few tiumes that i have gotten in over my head on here.