Amanda Baggs' video

[DirtDawg]

You have Insufferable Knowitall Syndrome?

Don't they offer Humility Suppositories for that, somewhere?

Thanks, but you're the funniest man alive. I just skip rocks across your pond.

[Lucifer]

Apart from you could technically do me for harrassment if i found you out to the level of depth you are expecting me to do, i would be safe legally

then why bring up the legal reasons as an excuse?  bottle job.

As for the age card, i am just arguing from your perspective, if thats how you view me then it is an important part of the arguement dont you think.

nope.  there are plenty of people your age who can put together an argument without bottling out.

On the matter of the quote, it takes a quick trawl if you have the right tools, but i dont have anything specialist to hand. So it would take longer for me to do some of the stuff by hand, that a specialist bit of a equipment could do for me.

fuckme - can you backpedal any faster?  your legs must be a blur.

And you are still a bully, i see you couldnt counter that one. Your post misses the post. And again, it wasnt me who gheyed you.

you feel bullied?  shame - i haven't even tried to bully you yet.  calling for mummy again?

bottle job.

[Christopher McCandless]

Apart from you could technically do me for harrassment if i found you out to the level of depth you are expecting me to do, i would be safe legally

then why bring up the legal reasons as an excuse?  bottle job.

As for the age card, i am just arguing from your perspective, if thats how you view me then it is an important part of the arguement dont you think.

nope.  there are plenty of people your age who can put together an argument without bottling out.

On the matter of the quote, it takes a quick trawl if you have the right tools, but i dont have anything specialist to hand. So it would take longer for me to do some of the stuff by hand, that a specialist bit of a equipment could do for me.

fuckme - can you backpedal any faster?  your legs must be a blur.

And you are still a bully, i see you couldnt counter that one. Your post misses the post. And again, it wasnt me who gheyed you.

you feel bullied?  shame - i haven't even tried to bully you yet.  calling for mummy again?

bottle job.

Oh i dont feel bullied, surprisingly i havent turned my tail and ran yet. But what you seem to do to others on this forum is pretty low, like attacking someone like richard in that way. if you want a fair fight with someone why dont you just challenge myself or calandale in open one on one debate. The point is you seem to think so low of me, but yet you are taking me on. That technically makes you a bully. Unless you address that, then i am going to have to assume you are a bully. End of unless you properly adress my point.

[Tesla]

yay!  just as i suspected - bottle job!

you're so predictable, young 'un.

Seriously, what would you do if i actually found you.

i'd be impressed.  i've tried to do it, and i can't find myself.

My guess is you would utterly shit yourself, and probably lie even if i get the right answer.

wrong and wrong.  why would i want to do either?

Wouldnt me actually doing it be a step too far.

why suggest it, then?  bottle job.

You didnt figure out my reason for playing games though, did you?

procrastination.  bottle job.

i'll just add "coward" to your list of "attributes", shall i?

If you think so little of me why do you try to pan me in arguements. Surely you would like to have a fair fight with someone. Either you secretly respect me a little or you are an out and out bully. Which is it going to be?

neither.  this is Intensity.  you get called on your words.  get used to it, noob.

and you're still trying to squirm out of your bottle job.  nice try, but no cigar.

Of course i get called on my words, but it seems to be you and your lapdog percisitently doing it. You have another motive, and you seem to get off on beating 18 year olds in arguements. I am going to assume you are a bully unless you give me an alterior motive.
As for the bottle job, i could find you, it takes lots of effort, and then of course then there are legal risks in me doing so. It would be possible however.

why are you playing the age card, when you were so scathing about what you saw as me doing that?

the word is "Ulterior".

it'd take lots of effort?  i quote:

Or maybe I know, and was just testing ideas. I have enough information to find all about you with a short trawl of the internet

from about an hour and 20 mins ago.  (ref:  http://www.intensitysquared.com/index.php?topic=4757.msg219706#msg219706 )

legal risks?    oh, the excuses are coming thick and fast, now.  bottle job.

Apart from you could technically do me for harrassment if i found you out to the level of depth you are expecting me to do, i would be safe legally
As for the age card, i am just arguing from your perspective, if thats how you view me then it is an important part of the arguement dont you think.
On the matter of the quote, it takes a quick trawl if you have the right tools, but i dont have anything specialist to hand. So it would take longer for me to do some of the stuff by hand, that a specialist bit of a equipment could do for me.
And you are still a bully, i see you couldnt counter that one. Your post misses the post. And again, it wasnt me who gheyed you.

Let me give it a shot.  Why do you consistently bring her or her name up.  She has done nothing but tell you to leave her the fuck alone but you can't let that be.

[Lucifer]

Oh i dont feel bullied,

what tosh - you're calling me a bully, and bringing in richard at this point is utterly pathetic, as well as irrelevant.  he goaded me, i responded, he legged it like a bastard.  hardly me being a bully, if he (or you) can't take what he dishes out. 

surprisingly i havent turned my tail and ran yet.

why surprisingly?

if you want a fair fight with someone why dont you just challenge myself or calandale in open one on one debate.

i don't.  i'm responding to you.  and what's calandale got to do with it?

The point is you seem to think so low of me, but yet you are taking me on. That technically makes you a bully.

er, care to share your convoluted logic, there?

Unless you address that, then i am going to have to assume you are a bully. End of unless you properly adress my point.

assume what you want.  you seem to think i'd care, although fuck knows why, as i've been very clear about that.  you want me to refute your accusation of my being a bully?  read my posts, then. 

[Lucifer]

Let me give it a shot.  Why do you consistently bring her or her name up.  She has done nothing but tell you to leave her the fuck alone but you can't let that be.

i'm glad someone else noticed, cos hardon doesn't seem to have.  i started to wonder if i'd imagined saying that (several times...)

[Christopher McCandless]

Oh i dont feel bullied,

what tosh - you're calling me a bully, and bringing in richard at this point is utterly pathetic, as well as irrelevant.  he goaded me, i responded, he legged it like a bastard.  hardly me being a bully, if he (or you) can't take what he dishes out. 

surprisingly i havent turned my tail and ran yet.

why surprisingly?

if you want a fair fight with someone why dont you just challenge myself or calandale in open one on one debate.

i don't.  i'm responding to you.  and what's calandale got to do with it?

The point is you seem to think so low of me, but yet you are taking me on. That technically makes you a bully.

er, care to share your convoluted logic, there?

Unless you address that, then i am going to have to assume you are a bully. End of unless you properly adress my point.

assume what you want.  you seem to think i'd care, although fuck knows why, as i've been very clear about that.  you want me to refute your accusation of my being a bully?  read my posts, then. 

Oh, taking on someone who claims to have an IQ of around 85 is not pathetic (i skimmed a few threads before i came here), then i really dont know what is. There was very different ways you could have handled the situation. Why do that to him.
Calandale would be a fair fight, as would be myself if you dont keep playing guerilla with your arguements.
I would say your behavior fits this definition nicely "In colloquial speech, bullying often describes a form of harassment perpetrated by an abuser who possesses more physical and/or social power and dominance than the victim. The victim of bullying is sometimes referred to as a target. The harassment can be verbal, physical and/or emotional." You certianly believe you are better than your targets dont you. As for reading my posts, they seem to be well presented absences of answers, rather than something meaningful.
As for you wanting me to go away, as tesla raised, why turn up and attack me on a thread if you dont want to deal with me. Which way are you going to have it?

[Lucifer]

Oh i dont feel bullied,

what tosh - you're calling me a bully, and bringing in richard at this point is utterly pathetic, as well as irrelevant.  he goaded me, i responded, he legged it like a bastard.  hardly me being a bully, if he (or you) can't take what he dishes out. 

surprisingly i havent turned my tail and ran yet.

why surprisingly?

if you want a fair fight with someone why dont you just challenge myself or calandale in open one on one debate.

i don't.  i'm responding to you.  and what's calandale got to do with it?

The point is you seem to think so low of me, but yet you are taking me on. That technically makes you a bully.

er, care to share your convoluted logic, there?

Unless you address that, then i am going to have to assume you are a bully. End of unless you properly adress my point.

assume what you want.  you seem to think i'd care, although fuck knows why, as i've been very clear about that.  you want me to refute your accusation of my being a bully?  read my posts, then. 

Oh, taking on someone who claims to have an IQ of around 85 is not pathetic (i skimmed a few threads before i came here), then i really dont know what is. There was very different ways you could have handled the situation. Why do that to him.
Calandale would be a fair fight, as would be myself if you dont keep playing guerilla with your arguements.
I would say your behavior fits this definition nicely "In colloquial speech, bullying often describes a form of harassment perpetrated by an abuser who possesses more physical and/or social power and dominance than the victim. The victim of bullying is sometimes referred to as a target. The harassment can be verbal, physical and/or emotional." You certianly believe you are better than your targets dont you. As for reading my posts, they seem to be well presented absences of answers, rather than something meaningful.
As for you wanting me to go away, as tesla raised, why turn up and attack me on a thread if you dont want to deal with me. Which way are you going to have it?

a)  i was brought up not to be impolite.  sadly, it's a habit i have difficulty shaking off.
b)  again, sadly, i have this thing about trying to support people who are obviously going to make a complete bollocks up of their life, due to inappropriate behaviour, and i don't give up easily.
c)  it's marginally better tham watching paint dry - if there was any excitement somewhere else on the board, you wouldn't get a look in.

so now i DO have more "social power/dominance" than you?  sorry - i thought you said you were better than me, knew more about PR and politics than me, was superior in intelligence, etc., etc.  shifting the goalposts is a sign of lack of argument.  clever, but weak.

[Christopher McCandless]

Oh i dont feel bullied,

what tosh - you're calling me a bully, and bringing in richard at this point is utterly pathetic, as well as irrelevant.  he goaded me, i responded, he legged it like a bastard.  hardly me being a bully, if he (or you) can't take what he dishes out. 

surprisingly i havent turned my tail and ran yet.

why surprisingly?

if you want a fair fight with someone why dont you just challenge myself or calandale in open one on one debate.

i don't.  i'm responding to you.  and what's calandale got to do with it?

The point is you seem to think so low of me, but yet you are taking me on. That technically makes you a bully.

er, care to share your convoluted logic, there?

Unless you address that, then i am going to have to assume you are a bully. End of unless you properly adress my point.

assume what you want.  you seem to think i'd care, although fuck knows why, as i've been very clear about that.  you want me to refute your accusation of my being a bully?  read my posts, then. 

Oh, taking on someone who claims to have an IQ of around 85 is not pathetic (i skimmed a few threads before i came here), then i really dont know what is. There was very different ways you could have handled the situation. Why do that to him.
Calandale would be a fair fight, as would be myself if you dont keep playing guerilla with your arguements.
I would say your behavior fits this definition nicely "In colloquial speech, bullying often describes a form of harassment perpetrated by an abuser who possesses more physical and/or social power and dominance than the victim. The victim of bullying is sometimes referred to as a target. The harassment can be verbal, physical and/or emotional." You certianly believe you are better than your targets dont you. As for reading my posts, they seem to be well presented absences of answers, rather than something meaningful.
As for you wanting me to go away, as tesla raised, why turn up and attack me on a thread if you dont want to deal with me. Which way are you going to have it?

a)  i was brought up not to be impolite.  sadly, it's a habit i have difficulty shaking off.
b)  again, sadly, i have this thing about trying to support people who are obviously going to make a complete bollocks up of their life, due to inappropriate behaviour, and i don't give up easily.
c)  it's marginally better tham watching paint dry - if there was any excitement somewhere else on the board, you wouldn't get a look in.

so now i DO have more "social power/dominance" than you?  sorry - i thought you said you were better than me, knew more about PR and politics than me, was superior in intelligence, etc., etc.  shifting the goalposts is a sign of lack of argument.  clever, but weak.

You were brought up with a strange set of manners Lucifer. I hope they get you far.
Oh, who is this you are supporting. I thought you liked to demolish people. Supporting people on a bed of sharp thorns doesnt count.
If you were to take me on like this in person you would have absolutely no chance, i have a certain style that i cant convey on this board, but you would get whooped. Under the bully definition, on here you have more social power than me, and seem to like applying it. That makes you fit my definition without moving the goal posts at all. Nice try to avoid this. What does it say about you though if i am the best source of entertainment on the forum. I do love the way you take a load of stuff i have said out of context though...

[Lucifer]

If you were to take me on like this in person you would have absolutely no chance, i have a certain style that i cant convey on this board, but you would get whooped.

you're on - try me.  come and pay me a visit, why don't you?

[Christopher McCandless]

If you were to take me on like this in person you would have absolutely no chance, i have a certain style that i cant convey on this board, but you would get whooped.

you're on - try me.  come and pay me a visit, why don't you?

i dont think your intresting enough to merit the journey...

[Tesla]

Oh i dont feel bullied,

what tosh - you're calling me a bully, and bringing in richard at this point is utterly pathetic, as well as irrelevant.  he goaded me, i responded, he legged it like a bastard.  hardly me being a bully, if he (or you) can't take what he dishes out. 

surprisingly i havent turned my tail and ran yet.

why surprisingly?

if you want a fair fight with someone why dont you just challenge myself or calandale in open one on one debate.

i don't.  i'm responding to you.  and what's calandale got to do with it?

The point is you seem to think so low of me, but yet you are taking me on. That technically makes you a bully.

er, care to share your convoluted logic, there?

Unless you address that, then i am going to have to assume you are a bully. End of unless you properly adress my point.

assume what you want.  you seem to think i'd care, although fuck knows why, as i've been very clear about that.  you want me to refute your accusation of my being a bully?  read my posts, then. 

Oh, taking on someone who claims to have an IQ of around 85 is not pathetic (i skimmed a few threads before i came here), then i really dont know what is. There was very different ways you could have handled the situation. Why do that to him.
Calandale would be a fair fight, as would be myself if you dont keep playing guerilla with your arguements.
I would say your behavior fits this definition nicely "In colloquial speech, bullying often describes a form of harassment perpetrated by an abuser who possesses more physical and/or social power and dominance than the victim. The victim of bullying is sometimes referred to as a target. The harassment can be verbal, physical and/or emotional." You certianly believe you are better than your targets dont you. As for reading my posts, they seem to be well presented absences of answers, rather than something meaningful.
As for you wanting me to go away, as tesla raised, why turn up and attack me on a thread if you dont want to deal with me. Which way are you going to have it?

a)  i was brought up not to be impolite.  sadly, it's a habit i have difficulty shaking off.
b)  again, sadly, i have this thing about trying to support people who are obviously going to make a complete bollocks up of their life, due to inappropriate behaviour, and i don't give up easily.
c)  it's marginally better tham watching paint dry - if there was any excitement somewhere else on the board, you wouldn't get a look in.

so now i DO have more "social power/dominance" than you?  sorry - i thought you said you were better than me, knew more about PR and politics than me, was superior in intelligence, etc., etc.  shifting the goalposts is a sign of lack of argument.  clever, but weak.

You were brought up with a strange set of manners Lucifer. I hope they get you far.
Oh, who is this you are supporting. I thought you liked to demolish people. Supporting people on a bed of sharp thorns doesnt count.
If you were to take me on like this in person you would have absolutely no chance, i have a certain style that i cant convey on this board, but you would get whooped. Under the bully definition, on here you have more social power than me, and seem to like applying it. That makes you fit my definition without moving the goal posts at all. Nice try to avoid this. What does it say about you though if i am the best source of entertainment on the forum. I do love the way you take a load of stuff i have said out of context though...

You say this ad nauseam.  I have a suggestion, why don't you get off the computer and use your superpower of charisma elsewhere.

[Christopher McCandless]

Oh i dont feel bullied,

what tosh - you're calling me a bully, and bringing in richard at this point is utterly pathetic, as well as irrelevant.  he goaded me, i responded, he legged it like a bastard.  hardly me being a bully, if he (or you) can't take what he dishes out. 

surprisingly i havent turned my tail and ran yet.

why surprisingly?

if you want a fair fight with someone why dont you just challenge myself or calandale in open one on one debate.

i don't.  i'm responding to you.  and what's calandale got to do with it?

The point is you seem to think so low of me, but yet you are taking me on. That technically makes you a bully.

er, care to share your convoluted logic, there?

Unless you address that, then i am going to have to assume you are a bully. End of unless you properly adress my point.

assume what you want.  you seem to think i'd care, although fuck knows why, as i've been very clear about that.  you want me to refute your accusation of my being a bully?  read my posts, then. 

Oh, taking on someone who claims to have an IQ of around 85 is not pathetic (i skimmed a few threads before i came here), then i really dont know what is. There was very different ways you could have handled the situation. Why do that to him.
Calandale would be a fair fight, as would be myself if you dont keep playing guerilla with your arguements.
I would say your behavior fits this definition nicely "In colloquial speech, bullying often describes a form of harassment perpetrated by an abuser who possesses more physical and/or social power and dominance than the victim. The victim of bullying is sometimes referred to as a target. The harassment can be verbal, physical and/or emotional." You certianly believe you are better than your targets dont you. As for reading my posts, they seem to be well presented absences of answers, rather than something meaningful.
As for you wanting me to go away, as tesla raised, why turn up and attack me on a thread if you dont want to deal with me. Which way are you going to have it?

a)  i was brought up not to be impolite.  sadly, it's a habit i have difficulty shaking off.
b)  again, sadly, i have this thing about trying to support people who are obviously going to make a complete bollocks up of their life, due to inappropriate behaviour, and i don't give up easily.
c)  it's marginally better tham watching paint dry - if there was any excitement somewhere else on the board, you wouldn't get a look in.

so now i DO have more "social power/dominance" than you?  sorry - i thought you said you were better than me, knew more about PR and politics than me, was superior in intelligence, etc., etc.  shifting the goalposts is a sign of lack of argument.  clever, but weak.

You were brought up with a strange set of manners Lucifer. I hope they get you far.
Oh, who is this you are supporting. I thought you liked to demolish people. Supporting people on a bed of sharp thorns doesnt count.
If you were to take me on like this in person you would have absolutely no chance, i have a certain style that i cant convey on this board, but you would get whooped. Under the bully definition, on here you have more social power than me, and seem to like applying it. That makes you fit my definition without moving the goal posts at all. Nice try to avoid this. What does it say about you though if i am the best source of entertainment on the forum. I do love the way you take a load of stuff i have said out of context though...

You say this ad nauseam.  I have a suggestion, why don't you get off the computer and use your superpower of charisma elsewhere.

Simple I dont enjoy using it. But i wouldnt complain if you followed your own advice about getting off the computer.

[Tesla]

I don't have superpowers.

[Lucifer]

If you were to take me on like this in person you would have absolutely no chance, i have a certain style that i cant convey on this board, but you would get whooped.

you're on - try me.  come and pay me a visit, why don't you?

i dont think your intresting enough to merit the journey...

complete bottle job! 

i called your bluff, love, and you really bricked it.  i do believe the expression is "PWNED!".

oh, and thanks for gheying me again - there's no-one else on here who would, so you just carry on showing your pettiness - it suits you.

now fuck off like a good little boy and find someone who gives a toss to play with.   

move right along, folks - nothing to see on here anymore.