Educational

Author Topic: Limits of free speech  (Read 7923 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Eamonn

  • Guest
Re: Limits of free speech
« Reply #195 on: July 22, 2007, 09:38:36 AM »
true.

and making mistakes is not bad.  but not learning from them is.

Learning from mistakes is bad? Making mistakes is not bad? Jesus Christ, Mcjagger, you dont half talk some shite sometimes.

Offline McGiver

  • Hetero sexist tragedy
  • Caretaker Admin
  • Postwhore Beyond The Pale
  • *****
  • Posts: 43309
  • Karma: 1341
  • Gender: Male
  • Do me.
Re: Limits of free speech
« Reply #196 on: July 22, 2007, 09:48:30 AM »
true.

and making mistakes is not bad.  but not learning from them is.

Learning from mistakes is bad? Making mistakes is not bad? Jesus Christ, Mcjagger, you dont half talk some shite sometimes.
Misunderstood.

Eamonn

  • Guest
Re: Limits of free speech
« Reply #197 on: July 22, 2007, 09:53:15 AM »
true.

and making mistakes is not bad.  but not learning from them is.

Learning from mistakes is bad? Making mistakes is not bad? Jesus Christ, Mcjagger, you dont half talk some shite sometimes.


That post should be directed at yourself. Though you do have a talent for taking the oldest and crappest pwned pictures and puns and overusing them like they are new. Youre juvenile behaviour gives me laughs sometimes but sometimes you need adult company without the jabbering silliness.

Back up your statement that making mistakes is not bad but not learning from them is or issue me with a most huble apology at once, you cretinous villian.
« Last Edit: July 22, 2007, 09:57:31 AM by Eamonn »

Offline McGiver

  • Hetero sexist tragedy
  • Caretaker Admin
  • Postwhore Beyond The Pale
  • *****
  • Posts: 43309
  • Karma: 1341
  • Gender: Male
  • Do me.
Re: Limits of free speech
« Reply #198 on: July 22, 2007, 09:56:18 AM »
everybody makes mistakes.  so why get down on someone for doing so.
look at the plank in your own eye before you tell me about the splinter in mine, and all that....

if you DON'T learn from your mistakes, then it is a problem.
why do i need to back that statement up?
Misunderstood.

Eamonn

  • Guest
Re: Limits of free speech
« Reply #199 on: July 22, 2007, 10:02:09 AM »
everybody makes mistakes.  so why get down on someone for doing so.
look at the plank in your own eye before you tell me about the splinter in mine, and all that....

if you DON'T learn from your mistakes, then it is a problem.
why do i need to back that statement up?

You appear to be correct, sir. I misread your statement. Too much reading bollocks on here has done it i think.

Offline McGiver

  • Hetero sexist tragedy
  • Caretaker Admin
  • Postwhore Beyond The Pale
  • *****
  • Posts: 43309
  • Karma: 1341
  • Gender: Male
  • Do me.
Re: Limits of free speech
« Reply #200 on: July 22, 2007, 10:17:14 AM »
everybody makes mistakes.  so why get down on someone for doing so.
look at the plank in your own eye before you tell me about the splinter in mine, and all that....

if you DON'T learn from your mistakes, then it is a problem.
why do i need to back that statement up?

You appear to be correct, sir. I misread your statement. Too much reading bollocks on here has done it i think.
glad to see that we can come to an understanding.
and i would suppose that from the argument that we all make mistakes, that forgiveness is close behind?
Misunderstood.

Eamonn

  • Guest
Re: Limits of free speech
« Reply #201 on: July 22, 2007, 10:32:46 AM »
everybody makes mistakes.  so why get down on someone for doing so.
look at the plank in your own eye before you tell me about the splinter in mine, and all that....

if you DON'T learn from your mistakes, then it is a problem.
why do i need to back that statement up?

You appear to be correct, sir. I misread your statement. Too much reading bollocks on here has done it i think.
glad to see that we can come to an understanding.
and i would suppose that from the argument that we all make mistakes, that forgiveness is close behind?

Forgiving who? I have no enemies here. (sure some might try to be my enemies but they are too mentally dumb to even come close to being my rivals)

Offline DirtDawg

  • Insensitive Oaf and Earthworm Whisperer
  • Elder
  • Almighty Postwhore
  • *****
  • Posts: 31540
  • Karma: 2540
  • Gender: Male
  • Last rays of the last days
Re: Limits of free speech
« Reply #202 on: July 22, 2007, 10:36:08 AM »
I'd try it but I don't think guests can see the free for all at the moment.  I wouldn't have thought they could but you never know.

I have been trying to be more responsible to log out when I leave and the Free For All Forum is indeed hdden, when I am logged out.

This is all I can see:

[attachment deleted by admin]
Jimi Hendrix: When the power of love overcomes the love of power the world will know peace. 

Ghandi: Live as if you were to die tomorrow. Learn as if you were to live forever.

The end result of life's daily pain and suffering, trials and failures, tears and laughter, readings and listenings is an accumulation of wisdom in its purest form.

Offline McGiver

  • Hetero sexist tragedy
  • Caretaker Admin
  • Postwhore Beyond The Pale
  • *****
  • Posts: 43309
  • Karma: 1341
  • Gender: Male
  • Do me.
Re: Limits of free speech
« Reply #203 on: July 22, 2007, 11:56:27 AM »
no wonder when guests become members they always complain about too many forums.
Misunderstood.

Offline Calandale

  • Official sheep shagger of the aspie underclass
  • Elder
  • Postwhore Beyond The Pale
  • *****
  • Posts: 41236
  • Karma: -57
  • Gender: Male
  • peep
    • The Game Box: Live!
Re: Limits of free speech
« Reply #204 on: July 22, 2007, 08:03:37 PM »

Forgiving who? I have no enemies here. (sure some might try to be my enemies but they are too mentally dumb to even come close to being my rivals)

Your inability to handle the language makes
this statement laughable.

I DO hope that you aren't a native speaker.
Even so, Litigious seemed far more capable
than you at communicating.

Visitor

  • Guest
Re: Limits of free speech
« Reply #205 on: July 22, 2007, 08:59:55 PM »
I'd try it but I don't think guests can see the free for all at the moment.  I wouldn't have thought they could but you never know.

Guests can see the Free For All and we can reply to topics but we cannot vote in the polls.

It would be pointless for us to be able to vote in a poll without logging in.

 :-*

Eamonn

  • Guest
Re: Limits of free speech
« Reply #206 on: July 22, 2007, 09:15:33 PM »

Forgiving who? I have no enemies here. (sure some might try to be my enemies but they are too mentally dumb to even come close to being my rivals)

Your inability to handle the language makes
this statement laughable.

I DO hope that you aren't a native speaker.
Even so, Litigious seemed far more capable
than you at communicating.

Do you mean native language, girly boy? What native language do you speak of? There's more than one you imbecile.

Offline Calandale

  • Official sheep shagger of the aspie underclass
  • Elder
  • Postwhore Beyond The Pale
  • *****
  • Posts: 41236
  • Karma: -57
  • Gender: Male
  • peep
    • The Game Box: Live!
Re: Limits of free speech
« Reply #207 on: July 22, 2007, 09:26:17 PM »

Forgiving who? I have no enemies here. (sure some might try to be my enemies but they are too mentally dumb to even come close to being my rivals)

Your inability to handle the language makes
this statement laughable.

I DO hope that you aren't a native speaker.
Even so, Litigious seemed far more capable
than you at communicating.

Do you mean native language, girly boy? What native language do you speak of? There's more than one you imbecile.

Since we are communicating in English, that would
be the presumed language of reference, oh thee of too
much 'intelligence' to realize.

What then is your native tongue, since it is more
and more clear that it isn't English (or perhaps you
were sadly schooled in the US public system, with
little outside reading).

Eamonn

  • Guest
Re: Limits of free speech
« Reply #208 on: July 22, 2007, 09:35:01 PM »

Forgiving who? I have no enemies here. (sure some might try to be my enemies but they are too mentally dumb to even come close to being my rivals)

Your inability to handle the language makes
this statement laughable.

I DO hope that you aren't a native speaker.
Even so, Litigious seemed far more capable
than you at communicating.

Do you mean native language, girly boy? What native language do you speak of? There's more than one you imbecile.

Since we are communicating in English, that would
be the presumed language of reference, oh thee of too
much 'intelligence' to realize.

What then is your native tongue, since it is more
and more clear that it isn't English (or perhaps you
were sadly schooled in the US public system, with
little outside reading).

Just like a typical bitch you keep coming back for a slapping then whine about it again. As you are dealing with a being with higher intelligence than yourself, you should presume nothing, assume nothing, except maybe that you look a fright in a frock you queen.

Offline Calandale

  • Official sheep shagger of the aspie underclass
  • Elder
  • Postwhore Beyond The Pale
  • *****
  • Posts: 41236
  • Karma: -57
  • Gender: Male
  • peep
    • The Game Box: Live!
Re: Limits of free speech
« Reply #209 on: July 22, 2007, 09:39:34 PM »

Just like a typical bitch you keep coming back for a slapping then whine about it again. As you are dealing with a being with higher intelligence than yourself, you should presume nothing, assume nothing, except maybe that you look a fright in a frock you queen.

Ah, once again you prove that you cannot answer
another's questions, but only attack; even if there
is no weakness where you aim. I do have to say,
you are the most tiresome twit that I've had to
deal with recently.

Enough. Go masturbate to your dreams that you
are more intelligent than my most recent sex partner.
You certainly are slimier.