Someone started a thread about us at WP.

[Eclair]

Lord, here we go....now it looks like all the WP's are joining here.
Can I get banned from this site if this shit continues?

Banned from Intensity?  No way!

Oh well, at least the membership might have an influx for a bit...

[Callaway]

I posted a hypothetical situation on Graelwyn's thread, so just in case it gets deleted as well:

Let's say hypothetically, for the sake of argument, that an adult in one country sent naked pictures of himself or herself to an underage child in Oregon, where the age of consent is 18, and solicited similar pictures from the child.  Looking at it from a pedantic legal standpoint, if these pictures are considered pornographic, whose laws would apply in this case: Oregon laws; US laws; the other country's laws; or international law?

[McGiver]

Lord, here we go....now it looks like all the WP's are joining here.
Can I get banned from this site if this shit continues?

Banned from Intensity?  No way!

Oh well, at least the membership might have an influx for a bit...

like i said earlier....welcome to the club.

your troublemaking is a good thing.

[McGiver]

I posted a hypothetical situation on Graelwyn's thread, so just in case it gets deleted as well:

Let's say hypothetically, for the sake of argument, that an adult in one country sent naked pictures of himself or herself to an underage child in Oregon, where the age of consent is 18, and solicited similar pictures from the child.  Looking at it from a pedantic legal standpoint, if these pictures are considered pornographic, whose laws would apply in this case: Oregon laws; US laws; the other country's laws; or international law?

you are the best.

[Eclair]

I posted a hypothetical situation on Graelwyn's thread, so just in case it gets deleted as well:

Let's say hypothetically, for the sake of argument, that an adult in one country sent naked pictures of himself or herself to an underage child in Oregon, where the age of consent is 18, and solicited similar pictures from the child.  Looking at it from a pedantic legal standpoint, if these pictures are considered pornographic, whose laws would apply in this case: Oregon laws; US laws; the other country's laws; or international law?

Is it just me or has the original thread of likedcalico's that was titled "I'm thinking of leaving Intensity" has disappeared from the haven?
The very one where not only I defend myself, but also, where I question whether Grael should be a Mod?

[McGiver]

I posted a hypothetical situation on Graelwyn's thread, so just in case it gets deleted as well:

Let's say hypothetically, for the sake of argument, that an adult in one country sent naked pictures of himself or herself to an underage child in Oregon, where the age of consent is 18, and solicited similar pictures from the child.  Looking at it from a pedantic legal standpoint, if these pictures are considered pornographic, whose laws would apply in this case: Oregon laws; US laws; the other country's laws; or international law?

Is it just me or has the original thread of likedcalico's that was titled "I'm thinking of leaving Intensity" has disappeared from the haven?
The very one where not only I defend myself, but also, where I question whether Grael should be a Mod?

it wasn't there.  i looked for it, but i only found graelwyns.

[Eclair]

I posted a hypothetical situation on Graelwyn's thread, so just in case it gets deleted as well:

Let's say hypothetically, for the sake of argument, that an adult in one country sent naked pictures of himself or herself to an underage child in Oregon, where the age of consent is 18, and solicited similar pictures from the child.  Looking at it from a pedantic legal standpoint, if these pictures are considered pornographic, whose laws would apply in this case: Oregon laws; US laws; the other country's laws; or international law?

Is it just me or has the original thread of likedcalico's that was titled "I'm thinking of leaving Intensity" has disappeared from the haven?
The very one where not only I defend myself, but also, where I question whether Grael should be a Mod?

it wasn't there.  i looked for it, but i only found graelwyns.

Oh but they leave the "I hate that fucking woman" one!  Thanks for checking...I thought I was having a special day and just couldn't see it.
Now becoming tempting to send Alex the shit she sent me.

[McGiver]

eclair, would you like to pm it to me and i can give you an objective viewpoint as to whether or not it is as bad as you think it is?

[Eclair]

eclair, would you like to pm it to me and i can give you an objective viewpoint as to whether or not it is as bad as you think it is?

Enjoy.

[Calandale]

because you troubled eclair.  and she is my new friend.

Wow I don't care, she hurt me so much she left me in tears. Accusing me of playing a game and then accusing me of playing it again on WP when I posted about my hurt feelings. We're both in the same boat. We insulted each other, hurt each other, and now hate each other.

That's too bad, because I think it was just a misunderstanding.

I posted in the thread, so now it will probably be deleted.  Posted for posterity:

i just went on that site theres something not right about it they don't seem autistic at all

Too intelligent?

you should be banned for that comment

Not at all. Like here, most members there have Asperger's.
There are a couple of HFAs, as well.
.

I do not doubt that but only a small  percent of people here tend to bash others. And those bashers tend to have memberships on that site to. I think there are additional comorbid factors like narcissistic personality disorder and sociopathy that explain the difference. And typically in the DSM-IV your most negative diagnosis is your primary diagnosis. So by my own estimation that site is not an autism site.

And exactly how much time did you spend on www.Intensitysquared.com before reaching this conclusion, TheMachine1?  If I remember correctly, you got frustrated with the registration process and gave up too easily.  Actually I can tell you the answer to this question.  You joined Intensitysquared on October 22, 2006 and your last visit there was November 4, 2006.  You spent a total of 2 hours and 55 minutes there and you made a total of 11 posts.

That is not a lot of time to psychoanalyze everyone on Intensitysquared and reach the conclusion that we don't have autism or we have some other personality disorders in addition to autism.  Why don't you spend more time there and then you can gather more information?  We tend to be older than the average members here because we don't accept members under 18.  Most of us are fairly intelligent people who are dedicated to the concept of freedom of speech.  Most of us have some sort of ASD.

Deleted indeed. Just lost a hell of a lot of
respect for the person who did it too.  Seems
like HE can't take the heat of being attacked
at all.

[Eclair]

because you troubled eclair.  and she is my new friend.

Wow I don't care, she hurt me so much she left me in tears. Accusing me of playing a game and then accusing me of playing it again on WP when I posted about my hurt feelings. We're both in the same boat. We insulted each other, hurt each other, and now hate each other.

That's too bad, because I think it was just a misunderstanding.

I posted in the thread, so now it will probably be deleted.  Posted for posterity:

i just went on that site theres something not right about it they don't seem autistic at all

Too intelligent?

you should be banned for that comment

Not at all. Like here, most members there have Asperger's.
There are a couple of HFAs, as well.
.

I do not doubt that but only a small  percent of people here tend to bash others. And those bashers tend to have memberships on that site to. I think there are additional comorbid factors like narcissistic personality disorder and sociopathy that explain the difference. And typically in the DSM-IV your most negative diagnosis is your primary diagnosis. So by my own estimation that site is not an autism site.

And exactly how much time did you spend on www.Intensitysquared.com before reaching this conclusion, TheMachine1?  If I remember correctly, you got frustrated with the registration process and gave up too easily.  Actually I can tell you the answer to this question.  You joined Intensitysquared on October 22, 2006 and your last visit there was November 4, 2006.  You spent a total of 2 hours and 55 minutes there and you made a total of 11 posts.

That is not a lot of time to psychoanalyze everyone on Intensitysquared and reach the conclusion that we don't have autism or we have some other personality disorders in addition to autism.  Why don't you spend more time there and then you can gather more information?  We tend to be older than the average members here because we don't accept members under 18.  Most of us are fairly intelligent people who are dedicated to the concept of freedom of speech.  Most of us have some sort of ASD.

Deleted indeed. Just lost a hell of a lot of
respect for the person who did it too.  Seems
like HE can't take the heat of being attacked
at all.

Where did you get this from?

[Eclair]

Note to self:  Don't bold red font

[McGiver]

Note to self:  Don't bold red font

the red font kinda scream off the page.

[Calandale]

Where did you get this from?

THIS thread. It's gone (not entirely, but you know)
at WP.

[Eclair]

Where did you get this from?

THIS thread. It's gone (not entirely, but you know)
at WP.

No, the red bolded verbal diarrhoea from here...
sheesh boy.